Optimal exposure parameters for digital radiography of the infant skull: a pilot study

AIM: To determine optimal exposure parameters when performing digital skull radiographs in infants with suspected non-accidental injury (NAI). METHOD: Anteroposterior and lateral post-mortem skull radiographs of six consecutive infants with suspected NAI were made at six exposure levels for each projection. Entrance surface doses ranged from 75-351 microGy. Exposures were made with a Fuji 5000R computed radiography system onto a standard resolution imaging plate. In three patients exposures were repeated using a high-resolution imaging plate. Hard copy images with an edge-enhancement factor of 0.5 were produced. Six observers assessed and scored the radiographs from 1=poor to 5=excellent for visualization of five criteria. The criteria scored included outer table of skull vault, inner table of skull vault, suture margins, vascular markings and soft tissues of the scalp. Radiographs were then ranked in order of overall image quality. Film density and sensitivity values were recorded. Local research committee approval was obtained. RESULTS: Current parameters give an average entrance surface dose of 253 microGy and 246 microGy for anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, respectively. The study demonstrated no perceived improvement in image quality above an entrance surface dose of 200 microGy (80% of current dose) or by the use of a high-resolution imaging plate. CONCLUSION: The potential exists to reduce radiation exposure in infants. A study has commenced to determine the effects of dose reduction on diagnostic accuracy in suspected NAI.     

Improved interpretation of digitized mammography with wavelet processing: a localization response operating characteristic study

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was the implementation and evaluation of a novel enhancement technique for improved interpretation of high-resolution digitized mammograms from computer monitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A wavelet algorithm was designed to attenuate the image spectral characteristics responsible for the long-range image correlation that often interferes with digital display. The algorithm was evaluated with a localization response operating characteristic (LROC) experiment with 500 negative, benign, and cancer cases with masses and calcification clusters. Three observers reviewed the original and wavelet-enhanced images on a 5-Mpixel monitor using a custom-made workstation user interface. RESULTS: Performance indexes were estimated for four different case combinations, each observer, and each interpretation mode. Wavelet enhancement improved the performance of all observers in all case combinations. Detection accuracy ranged from 0.678 to 0.827 for the unprocessed original data and 0.709-0.871 for the enhanced cases. Localization accuracy ranged from 0.547 to 0.785 for the original images and 0.568-0.847 for the enhanced cases, yielding increases of 5-15%. The difference between enhanced and original performances was statistically significant at the 0.10 level and in a few combinations at the 0.05 level. CONCLUSION: Soft-copy digitized mammography could replace standard film mammography under appropriate display parameters and conditions. The optimization of the soft-copy quality is expected to require more advanced processing techniques than standard gray-scale adjustments. Wavelet-based algorithms, such as the one proposed here, offer better soft-copy quality than the originals and a better starting point for additional manual gray-scale adjustments or automated postprocessing.     

Should 3K zoom function be used for detection of pneumothorax in cesium iodide/amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiographs presented on 1K-matrix soft copies?

The purpose of the study was to evaluate observer performance in the detection of pneumothorax with cesium iodide and amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography (CsI/a-Si FDR) presented as 1K and 3K soft-copy images. Forty patients with and 40 patients without pneumothorax diagnosed on previous and subsequent digital storage phosphor radiography (SPR, gold standard) had follow-up chest radiographs with CsI/a-Si FDR. Four observers confirmed or excluded the diagnosis of pneumothorax according to a five-point scale first on the 1K soft-copy image and then with help of 3K zoom function (1K monitor). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for each modality (1K and 3K). The area under the curve (AUC) values for each observer were 0.7815, 0.7779, 0.7946 and 0.7066 with 1K-matrix soft copies and 0.8123, 0.7997, 0.8078 and 0.7522 with 3K zoom. Overall detection of pneumothorax was better with 3K zoom. Differences between the two display methods were not statistically significant in 3 of 4 observers (p-values between 0.13 and 0.44; observer 4: p=0.02). The detection of pneumothorax with 3K zoom is better than with 1K soft copy but not at a statistically significant level. Differences between both display methods may be subtle. Still, our results indicate that 3K zoom should be employed in clinical practice.     

Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection

OBJECTIVES: To compare film, desktop monitor and laptop displays of digitized film images for accuracy of caries detection. METHODS: Sixty-four extracted teeth were mounted in eight models and radiographed with E-speed bitewing film. Films were digitized and displayed on a desktop monitor and a laptop display. Six observers scored the presence or absence of enamel and dentinal caries for each proximal surface for film, desktop and laptop displays. Results were compared with the histology of ground sections. ROC curve areas for each display mode and observer were assessed for significant differences with ANOVA. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy for proximal surface caries detection was not significantly different for conventional film or desktop monitor and laptop displays for detection of enamel caries (P = 0.9112) or dentin caries (P = 0.2796). CONCLUSIONS: Current laptop active matrix liquid crystal displays provide diagnostic quality for caries detection comparable with conventional film and desktop monitor displays.     

Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity of approximal caries detection on digital bitewing radiographs displayed at different image sizes on either a cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor or a thin film transistor (TFT) monitor. METHODS: Five observers assessed digital radiographs of a charge-coupled device (CCD)-based sensor system (Sidexis) of 160 unrestored premolars and molars for approximal caries using a six category caries rating scale. Images were displayed at ratios of 1:1, 1:2 and 1:7 on a CRT monitor (Nokia 446 XS) and a TFT display (Panasonic LC 50S). Histological assessments of serial sections were used as the validation standard. Diagnostic accuracy was expressed as area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and was calculated at two levels of caries penetration: presence of caries (I) and presence of a lesion in the dentine (II). The influence of the factors "monitor type", "image size" and "validation threshold" were analysed with repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: The ROC curve areas for approximal caries detection at both histological penetration levels were not influenced by the type of monitor display, whereas image size had a significant impact (P<0.01). AUCs for image size 1:7 (I, 0.62; II, 0.65) were smaller compared with ratios of 1:1 and 1:2 (P<0.01). No differences were observed between image size ratios 1:1 (I, 0.69; II, 0.74) and 1:2 (I, 0.68; II, 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the type of monitor did not influence approximal caries detection on digital radiographs. Image sizes with a display ratio of 1:1 and 1:2 resulted in better diagnostic validity than those with a ratio of 1:7.     

A comparison of conventional film,CR hard copy and PACS soft copy images of the chest: analyses of ROC curves and inter-observer agreement

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the accuracy of diagnosis of a spectrum of chest pathology was affected by the imaging technique used, and to compare conventional film/screen, hard copy computed (phosphor plate) radiography (CR) and soft copy CR (PACS) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each of 44 patients who had a CT examination of the thorax, PA and lateral chest radiographs were produced using conventional film, hard copy CR and soft copy PACS images. Five radiologists independently scored all images for the presence of abnormalities. The data were analysed in two stages using the result of the CT scan as the reference standard diagnosis: firstly, to investigate differences in abnormality scores between image modalities and observers using ROC analysis; secondly, to investigate the agreement of the diagnoses with the reference standard by the analysis of kappa scores. RESULTS: The ROC analyses and comparison of kappa scores showed no differences between image modalities (P=0.72, P=0.87), but highly significant differences between observers (P<0.001, P=0.003). CONCLUSION: The detection of chest lesions did not vary between conventional film, CR hard copy and PACS soft copy images. For all three image types, there were statistically significant differences between observers.     

Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats

Observer performance tests were conducted to compare the effects on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy (film) versus video display and to determine the diagnostic merits of conventional negative ("white bone") versus positive ("black bone") video displays. Subjective preferences were elicited from each observer for each display modality, and diagnostic accuracy was determined with receiver operating characteristic analysis. Digitized chest radiographs were used, including normal and abnormal cases with a variety of subtle abnormalities. The hard copy was printed with a 1,024 X 1,024-matrix by a high-quality drum scanner in conventional white bone format only. The video images were displayed on a 1,023-line monitor (30 Hz, interlaced) in both white bone and black bone formats with fixed window and brightness settings. Most observers preferred hard copy to video, but preferences were sharply divided between white bone and black bone video. Diagnostic accuracy was significantly greater with hard copy than with video display, and the conventional white bone format was significantly superior in accuracy to the black bone display.     

Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study

Observer performance tests were conducted to compare the effects on diagnostic accuracy of digital hard copy and video display formats versus conventional radiographic film. Digital images were obtained by digitizing conventional chest radiographs to a 2048 x 2048 matrix with a laser film scanner. Three digital display formats were used: laser-printed digital film, a 2048-line video monitor without user interaction, and a 2048-line video monitor with user interaction. Thirty-one posteroanterior chest radiographs, determined by consensus of four thoracic radiologists to contain septal lines (n = 11), parenchymal nodules (n = 7), nodules and septal lines (n = 7), or neither abnormality (n = 6), were used for the study. Images were interpreted by four radiologists in four separate viewing sessions. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by receiver-operating characteristic analysis for each observer with each viewing technique. No statistical differences in diagnostic accuracy, determined by the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve, were found between the analog film, the digital film, and the two video digital display formats. This preliminary study suggests that 2048-line digital displays may be an acceptable alternative to the traditional lightbox viewing method for the perception of these two abnormalities commonly seen on chest radiographs.     

Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of MTF compensation

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The investigators developed an efficient method for optimizing cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor performance for digital mammography, based on the correlation between the performance of human observers and the performance of a mathematical computer model of the human visual system. The investigators examined observer performance on soft-copy display of mammographic images that were either unprocessed or processed to compensate for modulation transfer function (MTF) deficiencies in the CRT display. The results were used to validate the human visual system model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six radiologists viewed a series of 250 mammographic images with microcalcification clusters with different contrast levels on a CRT monitor. The images were viewed twice: once without image processing and once with processing designed to compensate for MTF deficiencies in the CRT monitor. The images were analyzed with the JNDmetrix Visual Discrimination Model, which is based on the principles of just-noticeable difference measurement and frequency-channel vision modeling. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for the human observers and compared statistically with the model observers' performance. RESULTS: Both human and model performance was better overall with the MTF-compensated images, especially for microcalcifications in the midlevel contrast range. There was a very high correlation between human and model observers. CONCLUSION: The use of image-processing methods to compensate for limitations in the MTF of CRT monitors can improve the detection performance of radiologists searching for microcalcifications in mammographic images, and a model based on characteristics of the human visual system can be used to predict human observer results accurately.     

Using edge enhancement to identify subtle findings on soft-copy neonatal chest radiographs.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether edge enhancement could improve the visibility of subtle findings on soft copies of neonatal chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two radiologists reviewed 82 soft-copy neonatal chest radiographs before and after the application of edge enhancement on our picture archiving and communication system (PACS). The visibility of a pneumothorax (n = 22), central venous catheter (n = 32), umbilical arterial catheter (n = 36), endotracheal tube (n = 40), and normal anatomic structures (the minor fissure, anterior segmental bronchus of the right upper lobe, and aortic arch, n = 57) was evaluated. Six of 22 soft-copy images depicting a pneumothorax were excluded from the evaluation of image quality either because of the large size of the pneumothorax itself (n = 7) or because of the lack of confirmatory evidence that would have been provided by an additional lateral decubitus (n = 6) or cross-table lateral radiograph (n = 3). Image quality was evaluated by visual grading analysis. RESULTS: The visibility of a pneumothorax (p < 0.01), vascular catheters (p < 0.001), the minor fissure (p < 0.001), and the anterior segmental bronchus of the right upper lobe (p < 0.001) improved significantly after applying edge enhancement to soft copies of neonatal chest radiographs, whereas the visibility of the aortic arch did not improve. Evaluations of the improvements in the visibility of the endotracheal tube were inconsistent. CONCLUSION: Application of edge enhancement to soft copies of neonatal chest radiographs helps radiologists to identify small pneumothoraces, vascular catheters, and delicate normal structures, thereby improving the detection of subtle chest findings in the neonatal intensive care unit.     

Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs

PURPOSE: To examine the combined effects of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance for detecting abnormalities in a soft-copy interpretation of digital chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 254 digital chest radiographs were displayed on a high-resolution cathode ray tube monitor at three luminance levels (25, 50, and 100 foot-lamberts) under three ambient light levels (0, 50, and 460 lux). Six chest radiologists reviewed each image in nine modes of combined luminance and ambient light. The observers were allowed to adjust the window width and level of the soft-copy images. The abnormalities included nodule, pneumothorax, and interstitial disease. Observer performance was analyzed in terms of the receiver operating characteristics. The observers reported their subjective level of visual fatigue with each viewing mode. A statistical test was conducted for each of the abnormalities and for fatigue score by using repeated-measures two-way analysis of variance with an interaction. RESULTS: The detection of nodules was the only reading that was affected by the ambient light with a statistically significant difference (P <.05). Otherwise, observer performance for detecting a nodule, pneumothorax, and interstitial disease was not significantly different in the nine-mode comparison. There was no evidence that the luminance of the monitors was related to the ambient light for any of the abnormalities. The fatigue score showed a statistically significant difference due to both the luminance and ambient light. CONCLUSION: When adequate window width and level are applied to soft-copy images, the primary diagnosis with chest radiographs on the monitor is unlikely to be affected under low ambient light and a monitor luminance of 25 foot-lamberts or more.     

Personal computer versus workstation display: observer performance in detection of wrist fractures on digital radiographs

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the accuracy of observer performance with personal computer (PC) compared with that with dedicated picture archiving and communication system (PACS) workstation display in the detection of wrist fractures on computed radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2002 version) of the World Medical Association. The institutional clinical board approved the study; informed consent was not required. Seven observers independently assessed randomized anonymous digital radiographs of the wrist from 259 subjects; 146 had fractures, and 113 were healthy control subjects (151 male and 108 female subjects; average age, 33 years). Follow-up radiographs and/or computed tomographic scans were used as the reference standard for patients with fractures, and follow-up radiographs and/or clinical history data were used as the reference standard for controls. The PC was a standard hospital machine with a 17-inch (43-cm) color monitor with which Web browser display software was used. The PACS workstation had two portrait 21-inch (53-cm) monochrome monitors that displayed 2300 lines. The observers assigned scores to the radiographs on a scale of 1 (no fracture) to 5 (definite fracture). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared. RESULTS: The areas under the ROC curves were almost identical for the PC and workstation (0.910 vs 0.918, respectively; difference, 0.008; 95% confidence interval: -0.029, 0.013). The average sensitivity with the PC was almost identical to that with the workstation (85% vs 84%, respectively), as was the average specificity (82% vs 81%, respectively). The average accuracy (83%) was the same for both. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that there was no difference in accuracy of observer performance for detection of wrist fractures with a PC compared with that with a PACS workstation.     

Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare cathode ray tube (CRT) display with liquid crystal display (LCD) for soft-copy viewing of chest radiographs in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We displayed 80 posteroanterior digital chest radiographs side by side on a 5-megapixel CRT display and a 3-megapixel LCD. Gradation characteristics of both monitors were adjusted to DICOM display standards. Using a 4-point scale, seven radiologists ranked overall image quality and visibility of anatomic landmarks. Data analysis included Wilcoxon's rank sum test to assess the significance of preference for the different display modes and calculation of the percentage of images ranked equally by at least five of the seven radiologists. RESULTS: Wilcoxon's rank sum test found significant preferences (p < 0.001) for the CRT display for visualization of structures in low-attenuation areas of the thorax and for the LCD for visualization of structures in high-attenuation areas of the thorax. Overall image quality was ranked equal by at least five radiologists in 70% of cases, whereas for the remaining images a significant preference was found for the CRT display. CONCLUSION: We conclude that, under subdued ambient lighting conditions and without use of windowing, for most images the overall quality is equal with high-resolution CRT display and LCD. In images judged preferentially, we found a significant superiority for LCD for delineating mediastinal structures and for CRT display for delineating structures in the lung.     

Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of display phosphor

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors developed an efficient method for optimizing cathode ray tube performance for soft-copy digital mammography displays, based on correlation between the performance of human observers and the performance of a mathematical computer model of the human visual system. The authors measured radiologist performance on soft-copy display monitors with different phosphors and used these results to validate the human visual performance model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six radiologists viewed a series of 250 mammographic images with microcalcifications of different contrast levels. They viewed images on two soft-copy display monitors with phosphor luminescence-one with P45 and the other with P104. The same images were analyzed with the JNDmetrix Visual Discrimination Model, which is based on psychophysical just-noticeable difference measurement principles and on frequency-channel vision-modeling principles. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for the human and model observers' performances, and results were compared statistically. RESULTS: Both human and model performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) was better overall with the P45 than with the P104 monitor, especially for microcalcifications in the midlevel contrast range. There was high correlation between the human and model observers. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the type of phosphor in a display monitor can influence observer performance significantly and that a model based on characteristics of the human visual system can be used to predict human observer performance accurately.     

Interpretation of Emergency Department radiographs: a comparison of emergency medicine physicians with radiologists, residents with faculty, and film with digital display

OBJECTIVE: We determined the relative value of teleradiology and radiology resident coverage of the emergency department by measuring and comparing the effects of physician specialty, training level, and image display method on accuracy of radiograph interpretation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of four faculty emergency medicine physicians, four emergency medicine residents, four faculty radiologists, and four radiology residents participated in our study. Each physician interpreted 120 radiographs, approximately half containing a clinically important index finding. Radiographs were interpreted using the original films and high-resolution digital monitors. Accuracy of radiograph interpretation was measured as the area under the physicians' receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve was 0.15 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.20) greater for radiologists than for emergency medicine physicians, 0.07 (95% CI, 0.02-0.12) greater for faculty than for residents, and 0.07 (95% CI, 0.02-0.12) greater for films than for video monitors. Using these results, we estimated that teleradiology coverage by faculty radiologists would add 0.09 (95% CI, 0.03-0.15) to the area under the ROC curve for radiograph interpretation by emergency medicine faculty alone, and radiology resident coverage would add 0.08 (95% CI, 0.02-0.14) to this area. CONCLUSION: We observed significant differences between the interpretation of radiographs on film and on digital monitors. However, we observed differences of equal or greater magnitude associated with the training level and physician specialty of each observer. In evaluating teleradiology services, observer characteristics must be considered in addition to the quality of image display.     

Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.

Two methods are commonly used to visualize digital radiologic imaging data: (1) hard-copy viewing, in which the digital data are used to modulate the intensity of a laser beam that exposes an analog film and (2) soft-copy viewing, in which the digital data are converted to an analog video signal and presented on a CRT monitor. The film method allows new digital imaging systems to be easily integrated into conventional radiologic management and viewing methods. The second method, soft-copy viewing, allows digital imaging data to be managed and viewed electronically in a picture archiving and communication system (PACS). These PACS systems are hypothesized to have improved operational efficiency and enhanced image-analysis capabilities. The quality of soft-copy images is still not widely accepted. This article reports on the results of a large-scale receiver-operating-characteristic study comparing observers' performance in detecting various pediatric chest abnormalities on soft-copy 2048 x 2048K byte displays with their performance with digital laser-printed film from computed radiography. The disease categories studied were pneumothorax, linear atelectasis, air bronchogram, and interstitial disease. The selected data set included 239 images; 77 contained no proved abnormality and 162 contained one or more of the abnormalities mentioned. Seven pediatric radiologists participated in the study, two as judges and five as observers. Our results show no significant difference between viewing images on digital hard copy and soft copy for the detection of pneumothoraces and air bronchograms. A slight performance edge for soft copy was seen for interstitial disease and linear atelectasis. This result indicates that computed chest radiographs in children viewed in a soft-copy PACS environment should result in diagnoses similar to or slightly more accurate than those obtained in a laser-printed film-based environment.     

Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance study

The purpose of the study was to compare observer performance in the detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer among hard-copy reading and soft-copy readings using 3-megapixel (3M) and 5-megapixel (5M) liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors. For the microcalcification detection test, we prepared 100 mammograms: 40 surgically verified cancer cases and 60 normal cases. For the mass detection test, we prepared 100 mammograms: 50 cancer cases and 50 normal cases. After six readers assessed both microcalcifications and masses set for each modality, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. The average A_zs for mass detection using a hard copy and 3M and 5M LCD monitors were 0.923, 0.927 and 0.920, respectively; there were no significant differences. The average A_z for microcalcification detection using hard copy, 3M and 5M LCD monitors was 0.977, 0.954 and 0.972, respectively. There were no significant differences, but the P-values between the hard copy and 3M LCD monitor and that between the 3M and 5M LCD monitor were 0.08 and 0.09, respectively. In conclusion, the observer performances for detecting masses of breast cancers were comparable among the hard copy and two LCD monitors; however, soft-copy reading with a 3M LCD monitor showed slightly lower observer performance for detecting microcalcifications of breast cancers than hard-copy or 5M LCD monitor reading.     

Minimum number of basis projections for caries detection with local CT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between the number of basis projections for local computed tomography (CT) and the detection of proximal caries and to find a minimum number of projections needed to maintain diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: We presented observers (n = 12) with stacks of both axial and vertical CT slices of 23 extracted teeth placed in a dry human mandible. The slices were prepared with 14, 20, 33 and 100 basis projections. The observers scored the proximal surfaces for the presence of caries on a 1-5 confidence scale. The performance of the varying number of projections was compared with conventional digital radiographs. RESULTS: The performance of all four CT modalities was significantly better than conventional radiographs (P = 0.005 to P = 0.021) and showed a consistent increase with the number of projections. Diagnostic performance depended significantly on lesion depth (P = 0.00), but not on observer. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the number of CT projections used can be reduced at least to 20 with the diagnostic performance still markedly better than that of conventional film, provided that the observer can make use of both axial and vertical stacks of CT slices.     

Diagnosing biliary complications of orthotopic liver transplantation with mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography: comparison with conventional MR cholangiography

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine whether the addition of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MRI could improve the image quality, visualization of ductal structures, and diagnostic confidence provided by conventional T2-based MR cholangiography (MRC) in patients with suspected biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Our study group consisted of 25 consecutive patients who were referred for MR evaluation of clinically suspected biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Conventional MRC in the axial and coronal planes was performed in each patient, followed by fat-suppressed volumetric gradient-echo imaging in the same planes both before and after the IV administration of mangafodipir trisodium. Imaging was performed in all patients until the contrast agent was seen in the bowel. Images were then graded for quality, visualization of bile ducts and anastomoses, presence of significant stricture or leak, and level of diagnostic confidence. RESULTS: Mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MRC tended to outperform conventional MRC in overall image quality and extrahepatic duct visualization; it was also more effective in delineating biliary anastomoses, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). All 25 enhanced examinations were considered diagnostic. Diagnostic confidence was scored as poor or lacking in 14 of the conventional MRC examinations for biliary stenosis and in 12 examinations for biliary leak. CONCLUSION: Enhancement with mangafodipir trisodium improves the performance of MRC for the detection and exclusion of biliary abnormalities after orthotopic liver transplantation. Future investigations should compare the performance of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MRC with the performance of more invasive techniques.     

Reliability of soft-copy versus hard-copy interpretation of emergency department radiographs: a prototype study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic reliability of hard-copy and soft-copy interpretation of radiographs obtained in the emergency department using a methodology for evaluating imaging systems when independent proof of the diagnosis is not available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected radiographs from a stratified sample of 100 patients seen in the emergency department. The images were obtained using computed radiography, and the digital images were printed on film and stored for display on a workstation. A group of seven experienced radiologists reported the cases using both film and the workstation display. The results were analyzed using mixture distribution analysis (MDA). RESULTS: The reliability expressed as the percentage of agreement of a typical observer relative to the majority was computed from the MDA. The result was 90% for both hard copy and soft copy with bootstrap confidence intervals of 86-94%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that, in the emergency department, soft-copy interpretation is as reliable as hard-copy interpretation. The strength of this conclusion depends on the validity of the MDA approach as well as the extent to which the observer sample and case sample are representative of the emergency department.