Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

In treating uncomplicated abdominal aortic aenurysm, endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been employed as a good alternative to open repair with low perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, the aneurysm can enlarge or rupture even after EVAR as a result of device failure, endoleak, or graft migration. We experienced two cases of aneurismal rupture after EVAR, which were successfully treated by surgical extra-anatomic bypass.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair after pancreaticoduodenectomy

We present two cases of patients with coincidental pancreatic disease and abdominal aortic aneurysm. Initial pancreaticoduodenectomy was followed by staged abdominal aortic aneurysm repair via a retroperitoneal approach in both cases. We recommend the retroperitoneal approach over the transperitoneal approach as an easier and safer method of aortic aneurysmorrhaphy after the Whipple procedure. (J VASC SURG 1995;21:537-9.)     

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to present the experience with aneurysm rupture after deployment of Guidant/EVT (Guidant) endografts and review previously reported cases with other devices. METHODS: Records from Guidant/EVT clinical trials and postmarket approval databases from February 1993 to August 2000 were analyzed to identify patients with rupture and to extract pertinent data. Previously reported cases were obtained with a Medline search. RESULTS: Seven ruptures were found with Guidant/EVT devices. Five of these occurred among the 686 patients in US Food and Drug Administration protocols (group I) who were followed for a mean of 41.8 +/- 21.9 months and limited to the subgroup of 93 first generation tube endografts. Two ruptures occurred in group II (3260 patients after market approval with limited follow-up), specifically in the subgroup of 166 patients who underwent treatment with second generation tube grafts. No ruptures were found in patients with bifurcation or unilateral iliac implants followed for a mean of 37.5 months. All ruptures were caused by distal aortic type I endoleaks on the basis of attachment system fractures (first generation devices only), aortic neck dilatations, persistent primary endoleaks, migration, overlooked imaging abnormalities, refused reintervention, and poor patient selection. The mortality rate was 57% (4/7) overall and was 50% for surgical repair (3/6). A literature search identified 40 additional ruptures related to other devices, for a total of 47. All 44 that were documented with adequate data were caused by endoleaks (26 type I, 2 type II, 11 type III, and 5 source not reported). Other contributing factors were graft module separation and graft wall deterioration. The overall mortality rate for the combined series was 50%, with an operative mortality rate of 41%. CONCLUSION: Postendograft AAA rupture is infrequent, although the true incidence rate is unclear because of inadequate follow-up of individual device designs. Tube endografts should be limited to the rare patient with ideal anatomy, no other alternatives, and at high risk for standard open repair. Prevention of aneurysm rupture requires long-term surveillance with attention to subtle imaging abnormalities and the establishment of reliable follow-up protocols for specific devices. The outcome of postendograft aneurysm rupture is similar to that of rupture without prior endograft therapy.     

Secondary procedures after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, distribution, and indications of secondary procedures after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EAR). METHODS: At a single institution, 179 patients underwent EAR with four different endografts (AneuRx, n = 117; Zenith, n = 49; Ancure, n = 12; and Talent, n = 1). The vascular section database was queried for patients who needed secondary procedures after the original EAR. The mean time from EAR to the termination of the study was 27.0 +/- 16.7 months. Type I or III endoleaks were treated aggressively. Type II endoleaks were treated only in the presence of aneurysm expansion. RESULTS: Thirty-five (35/179; 19.6%) secondary procedures were performed in 32 patients. Indications for secondary procedures included 14 limb occlusions or stenoses (40.0%), 13 endoleaks (37.1%), six endograft migrations (17.1%), one delayed aneurysm rupture (2.8%), and one device malfunction (2.8%). Seven of the 10 early (<90 days) limb failures (70%) occurred within the first 60 patients. At that time, a protocol with aggressive external iliac artery evaluation was adopted. In the next 125 patients, the rate of early limb occlusion or stenosis was 2.4% (P =.025, with Fisher exact test). Distribution of secondary procedures included 23 endoluminal interventions (65.7%; angioplasty +/- stent placement, thrombolysis, endocuff placement, embolization), eight traditional peripheral procedures (22.9%; femoral-femoral bypass, thrombectomy), two laparoscopic interventions (5.7%; inferior mesenteric artery ligation), and two laparotomies (5.7%; delayed conversions). Interventions for limb occlusion or stenosis occurred earliest (3.5 +/- 5.4 months; P <.05, with analysis of variance), followed by treatment of endoleaks (14.3 +/- 12.9 months) and migration (27.5 +/- 10.4 months). The one delayed rupture occurred at 15.3 months. CONCLUSION: Secondary procedures after EAR are common. Reinterventions can be grouped temporally on the basis of indication. Treatment for limb ischemia is predominately early (>/=3 months), whereas treatment for endoleaks occurs at approximately 1 year and interventions for migration predominate after 2 years.     

Maximal aneurysm diameter follow-up is inadequate after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: follow-up after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EAR) generally consists of serial diameter measurements. A size change after EAR, however, is the consequence of alterations of the excluded aneurysm sac volume. OBJECTIVE: to assess the agreement between diameter measurements and volume measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: from 53 consecutive patients scheduled for EAR, follow-up of at least 6 months was available in 35 patients. CTA was performed on all patients at discharge, at 6 months and yearly thereafter. The resulting 113 datasets were processed on a workstation in a blinded and random order. Maximal aneurysm diameter (DMAX) was measured along the central lumen line. Total aneurysm volume was measured by manual segmentation. All measurements of an individual patient were compared with each other, resulting in 149 comparisons. The significance of individual size changes was classified based on the 95% confidence limits of the intra-observer variability, using difference-of-means analysis. DMAX changes were compared to volume changes. RESULTS: in 37% of the comparisons, discordance was found between DMAX and volume measurements. A decrease in aneurysm size was missed using DMAX in 14% of cases and an increase in 19% of cases. CONCLUSION: aneurysm size changes after EAR are not noticed using maximal diameter measurements in over one-third of cases.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm sac shrinkage after endovascular aneurysm repair: correlation with chronic sac pressure measurement

OBJECTIVES: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac shrinkage after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is considered to be evidence of clinical success. Exclusion of the sac from systemic pressure is the likely cause of shrinkage. We report our continuing clinical experience with the use of a permanently implantable, ultrasound-activated remote pressure transducer to measure intrasac pressure and its correlation with changes in sac diameter over time. METHODS: Over a 22-month period, 21 patients underwent EVAR of an infrarenal AAA with implantation of an ultrasound-activated remote pressure transducer fixed to the outside of the stent-graft and exposed to the excluded aortic sac. Intrasac pressures were measured directly with an intravascular catheter and by the remote sensor at the time of stent-graft deployment. Follow-up sac pressures were measured by remote sensor and compared with systemic arterial pressure at every follow-up visit. Mean follow-up was 11.4 +/- 5.0 months (range, 1 to 26 months). Twenty patients had follow-up of > or =6 months. Mean pressure index (MPI) was calculated as the ratio of mean sac pressure to mean systemic pressure. RESULTS: Pressures could be obtained at all visits in 15 of the 21 patients. Fourteen of these 15 patients had follow-up of at least 6 months. Aneurysm sac shrinkage of >5 mm was seen in seven (50%) of these 14 patients. No aneurysm enlargement was observed in any patient. The MPI was significantly lower in patients with sac shrinkage at 6 months and at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular aneurysm repair results in marked reduction of sac pressure in most patients. Patients with aneurysm shrinkage after EVAR have significantly lower MPI; however, the absence of sac shrinkage does not imply persistent pressurization of the sac. Further clinical follow-up will delineate the role of long-term sac pressure monitoring in surveillance after EVAR.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm neck remodeling after open aneurysm repair

PURPOSE: Proximal endovascular aortic graft fixation and maintenance of hemostatic seal depends on the long-term stability of the aortic neck. Previous investigations of aortic neck dilation mostly focused on the infrarenal aortic diameter. Fenestrated and branched stent grafts facilitate suprarenal graft fixation and may thereby improve the long-term integrity of the aortic attachment site. For these devices, the natural history of the suprarenal aortic segment is also of interest. We investigated the natural history of the supra- and infrarenal aortic segment after open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: For this retrospective analysis, we reviewed the preoperative and the initial postoperative as well as the most recent CT series that were obtained from 52 patients undergoing conventional repair of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm between January 1998 and December 2002. Measurements were performed using electronic calipers on a "split screen", allowing direct comparison of subsequent CT series at corresponding levels along the vessel. Main outcome measures were changes in postoperative measures of the supra- and infrarenal aortic diameters. RESULTS: The first postoperative exam was at a mean (+/-SD) of 7.0 +/- 3.5 months, and the final exams were at 44.4 +/- 21 months. Over this time period, the estimated rate of change in suprarenal diameter was 0.18 mm/ y with 95% confidence interval (CI) from 0.08 to 0.27. The estimated rate of change for the infrarenal diameter was 0.16 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.27). A clinically relevant diameter increase of >or=3 mm was observed in seven patients (13%). There was evidence of larger diameter increases associated with larger AAA diameters (P = .003 and <.001 for suprarenal and infrarenal diameters), an inverted funnel shape (P = .002 and <.001), and marginal evidence of association with a history of inguinal hernia (P = .043 and .066). CONCLUSIONS: Although there is statistically significant evidence of increases in the supra- and infrarenal aortic diameters after conventional AAA repair, mean annual increases tended to be small and clinically relevant increases of 3 mm or more were observed in only a small proportion of cases.     

Aorto-duodenal fistula on an aortic endograft: a rare cause of late conversion after endovascular aneurysm repair

The last few years have seen an increase in popularity of endovascular aneurysm repair because of the improvements made to the endografts design as well as experience gained by physicians, but the long-term results of this procedure are still uncertain. The majority of late complications after an endograft can be treated with an endovascular approach but, in some cases, it may need conversion to open surgery. In this paper, we discuss the case of a male patient who presented with an aorto-duodenal fistula on an endograft requiring explant. After two operations and 20 days in hospital, the patient was discharged and after 1 year he is doing well. In medical literature, there are very few reported cases of aortoenteric fistula complicating endovascular prosthesis, the diagnosis is quite difficult, surgical treatment is fairly complex consisting in endograft removal and we refer to our experience on this difficult and life-threatening operation.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Options for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair include both open and endovascular approaches. Patient selection for each of these requires careful consideration relating to patient health, fitness and anatomy. This article aims to provide an overview of the essential aspects of both open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular AAA repair (EVAR), focussing upon decision making, the procedures, follow-up and long-term outcomes. Consideration is also given to more complex AAA repairs, including fenestrated/branched stent grafts and open juxta-renal aneurysm repairs. AAA epidemiology, screening, and work up for repair are covered in the previous article.     

Abdominal aortic endograft proximal collapse resulting in aortic aneurysm rupture

An 82-year-old man was transferred to our emergency department due to acute abdominal pain. He had undergone an endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) six years ago. An intravenous contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography revealed the rupture of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with a large retroperitoneal hematoma. A Talent (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) modular bifurcated endoprosthesis had vertically collapsed approximately 7 cm after losing its infrarenal fixation. As a result, it led to the repressurization of the aneurysm sac and rupture. The patient was successfully treated by placing three Talent (Medtronic) aortic cuffs. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of endograft collapse that has manifested with aortic aneurysm rupture. Although they are gradually declining, considerable rates of complications create the 'Achilles' heel' of endovascular repair of AAAs. A lifelong follow-up strategy for patients treated for AAA with EVAR is essential for the early detection and treatment of complications of the procedure.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Newer, minimally invasive catheter-based endovascular technology utilizing stent grafts are currently being evaluated for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. A retrospective review of all (3 years) consecutive, non-ruptured elective AAA repairs was undertaken to document the results of AAA surgical repair in a modern cohort of patients to allow a contemporary comparison with the evolving endoluminal data. One hundred twenty-one AAAs were identified in a male veteran population. Mean age was 68.5 +/-7.7 years. Medical history review showed hypertension in 55%, heart disease in 73.5%, peripheral vascular disease in 21%, stroke and transient ischemic attacks in 22%, diabetes mellitus in 7%, renal insufficiency in 10%, and smoking history in 80%. The AAA size was documented with ultrasound (5.2 +/-1.3 cm, n=40) and computed tomography (5.6 +/-1.3 cm, n=100). Fifty-nine percent had angiography. Intraoperative end points included an operative time of 165 +/-6.3 minutes from incision to dressing placement. A Dacron tube graft was used in 78%, the remaining were Dacron bifurcated grafts. A suprarenal clamp was used in 8% for proximal aortic control with juxtarenal aneurysms. A pulmonary-artery catheter was placed in 69%. A transverse incision was used in 69% of patients and a midline incision was used in the rest. Estimated blood loss was 1505 +/-103 mL; cell saver blood returned 754 +/-53 mL; crystalloid/Hespan 4771 +/-176 mL; banked packed red blood cells 0.75 +/-0.11 U. Time to extubation was, in the operating room (78.5%), on the day of the operation (5.0%), postoperative day (POD) 1 (12.4%), POD2 (1.7%), POD3 (0.8%), and one case was performed with epidural anesthesia only. Postoperative end points included a 30-day mortality rate of 1.6% (two patients). Postoperative morbidity included wound dehiscence 0.8%; sepsis, urinary tract infection, wound infection, leg ischemia, ischemic colitis, and stroke each had an incidence of 1.6%; myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, pneumonia, re-operation for suspected bleeding, and ileus or bowel obstruction occurred with an incidence of 3.3%. No significant increase in serum creatinine levels was noted. Time to enteral fluids/nutrition was 3.5 +/-0.08 days. Patients were out of bed to a chair or walking by 1.3 +/-0.06 days postoperatively. The length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) was 2.0 +/-0.12 days and postoperative hospital stay was 6.6 +/- 0.33 days. Transfusion requirement for the hospital stay was 1.6 +/-0.2 U per patient. This review highlights a cohort of male veteran patients with significant cardiac co-morbidity who have undergone repair with a conventional open technique and low mortality and morbidity rates. This group had rapid extubation, time to oral intake, and ambulation. In addition, ICU and hospital stays were relatively short.     

Ischemic complications after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVES: Limb and pelvic ischemia are known complications after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). The objective of this paper is to present our experience with the incidence, presentation, and management of such complications. METHODS: Over 9 years 311 patients with aortic aneurysms underwent EVAR. A retrospective review identified 28 patients (9.0%) with ischemic complications. RESULTS: Among 28 patients with ischemic complications, 21 had lower extremity ischemia and 7 had pelvic ischemia: colon (n = 4), buttock (n = 2), and spinal cord (n = 2). Of the 21 patients with lower extremity ischemia, 15 had limb occlusions (71.4%), 3 due to embolization (14.7%) and 3 the result of common femoral artery thromboses (14.7%). Limb occlusions were manifested as severe acute arterial ischemia (n = 6), rest pain (n = 3), intermittent claudication (n = 5), and decreased femoral pulse (n = 1). Limb occlusions were managed with thrombectomy and stent placement (n = 4), femorofemoral bypass (n = 7), eventual explantation because of persistent endoleak (n = 1), and expectant management (n = 3). The 3 patients with occlusions managed expectantly all had intermittent claudication, which has subsequently improved. In the 6 patients with lower extremity ischemia due to embolization or common femoral artery injury presentation was acute, and embolectomy was performed, followed by femoral artery endarterectomy and patch angioplasty or placement of an interposition graft. One patient who had a prolonged postoperative course including cardiac arrest subsequently required distal bypass and ultimately above- knee amputation. Among the 7 patients with pelvic ischemia, 2 patients had unilateral hypogastric artery embolization before the original surgery. Among the patients with colonic ischemia, 3 were seen immediately postoperatively, and required colectomy and colostomy. Two patients who required urgent colectomy subsequently had multiple organ failure, and died in the perioperative period. One patient had abdominal pain 1 week after surgery, which was managed with bowel rest, with subsequent improvement. In 2 patients spinal cord ischemia developed immediately after surgery, which resulted in persistent paraplegia. Buttock ischemia developed in 2 patients, 1 of whom required fasciotomy because of gluteal compartment syndrome, and had transient renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic complications are not uncommon after EVAR, and may exceed the incidence with open surgical repair. Limb ischemia is most often a result of limb occlusion, and can be successfully managed with standard interventions. Pelvic ischemia often results from atheroembolization despite preservation of hypogastric arterial circulation. Colonic and spinal ischemia are associated with the highest morbidity and mortality.