Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia, hypermetropia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a series of 27 cases.

BACKGROUND: Excimer laser treatment has been shown to be effective and safe in correcting anisometropia following penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). In this report we review our experience with excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct refractive myopia, hypermetropia and astigmatism in patients who had undergone PKP for keratoconus. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 22 patients (27 eyes) who had undergone LASIK to correct myopia, hypermetropia or astigmatism, in simple or combined forms, following corneal transplantation for keratoconus. LASIK was performed at a hospital in Curitiba, Brazil, between September 1998 and February 2000. The eyes were classified into two groups: those with a negative spherical equivalent and those with a positive spherical equivalent. LASIK was performed using the Moria LSK microkeratome and the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. RESULTS: The mean length of follow-up was 9.52 months for the 23 eyes with myopia and 5.75 months for the 4 eyes with hypermetropia. The mean refractive spherical equivalent in the myopic eyes was -5.27 (standard deviation [SD] 1.91) dioptres before LASIK and -0.45 D (SD 1.68 D) at the last follow-up visit. The corresponding values in the eyes with hypermetropia were +5.18 D (SD 1.46 D) and + 1.18 D (SD 0.94 D). The rate of regression of astigmatism in the myopic eyes was 76%. After surgery 18 (78%) of the myopic eyes and all the hypermetropic eyes had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. The best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was better than 20/25 in 22 (95.7%) of the myopic eyes and all the hypermetropic eyes. One eye lost 1 line of best spectacle-corrected Snellen visual acuity, and one eye lost 6 lines secondary to epithelial ingrowth. Wound dehiscence, intraoperative flap complications, graft rejection or other complications did not develop in this series. INTERPRETATION: In this series, LASIK proved to be relatively safe and effective in correcting refractive errors after PKP for keratoconus.     

LASIK治疗近视散光的临床观察

目的:观察准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(laser in situ kera-tomileusis,LASIK)治疗近视散光的临床疗效。方法:应用鹰视准分子激光治疗系统对120例234眼近视散光进行LASIK手术治疗。随访12mo,比较手术前后的视力、屈光度、散光及其散光轴位的变化。结果:术后随访12mo,裸眼视力≥术前最佳矫正视力(BCVA)者108例213眼(91%),屈光度在±1.00D以内者112例222眼(94.8%),散光残留平均为-0.52D。结论:LASIK治疗近视散光效果好,稳定性高,安全可靠。     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correction of high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty, and to assess the refractive results and predictability of the procedure. METHODS: LASIK was performed on 19 patients (19 eyes) with high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty, using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser. The amount of preoperative refractive astigmatism ranged from 6.50 to 14.50 D (mean, 9.21 +/- 1.95 D) and the spherical component of manifest refraction ranged from -7.00 to +1.25 D (mean, -2.14 +/- 2.11 D). All patients completed a minimum follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: Refraction was stable after 3 months. At 1 year after LASIK, the amount of refractive astigmatism was reduced to a mean of 1.09 +/- 0.33 D (range, 0.50 to 1.75 D), with 57.9% of the eyes within +/- 1.00 D of refractive astigmatism. The mean percent reduction of astigmatism was 87.9 +/- 3.7%. The postoperative spherical component of manifest refraction ranged from -1.00 to +1.75 D with a mean of +0.43 +/- 0.82 D. Vector analysis showed that the mean amount of axis deviation was 1.1 +/- 1.3 degrees and the mean percent correction of preoperative astigmatism was 92.6 +/- 8.4%. There were no intraoperative complications. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was not reduced in any eye, and improved by 2 or more lines in 42.1% of eyes after LASIK. CONCLUSION: LASIK with the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser was effective for correction of both astigmatism and myopia after penetrating keratoplasty. The procedure proved to be safe and gave fairly predictable and stable refractive results.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 laser

PURPOSE: We studied the efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for moderate to high simple and compound myopic astigmatism. METHODS: Ninety-two eyes of 46 consecutive patients who had LASIK for myopic astigmatism (64 eyes, astigmatism 3.00 to 9.00 D; myopia 0 to -20.00 D), or simple myopia (28 eyes, myopia -4.00 to -20.00 D; astigmatism 0 to 0.50 D) were retrospectively studied. Mean baseline spherical equivalent refraction (SE) in the myopia group was -8.11 +/- 3.94 D and in the astigmatism group, -8.55 +/- 4.49 D. All eyes underwent LASIK using the Nidek EC-5000 laser by the same surgeon. RESULTS: At 6 months after LASIK in the myopia group versus the astigmatism group, 24 eyes (85%) vs. 54 eyes (84%) were available for follow-up, 12 eyes (50%) vs. 13 eyes (24%) had uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20, 19 eyes (79%) vs. 44 eyes (81%) had UCVA of 20/40, 8 eyes (33%) vs. 18 eyes (33%) had SE within +/- 0.50 D, 15 eyes (62%) vs. 39 eyes (72%) had SE within +/- 1.00 D, and mean SE was -1.22 +/- 1.17 D vs. -0.74 +/- 1.46 D. Mean astigmatism (vertexed to the corneal plane) in the astigmatism group was 2.77 D at 0 degrees before surgery and 0.32 D at 7 degrees at 6 months. None of the myopic eyes and three of the astigmatic eyes (5%) lost > or = 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. CONCLUSION: LASIK with the Nidek EC-5000 laser for myopic astigmatism was reasonably effective, predictable, and safe. Astigmatism was under-corrected with the nomogram implemented in this study.     

The LADAR6000: results in highly myopic and highly astigmatic eyes

PURPOSE: To investigate the early clinical outcomes of the Alcon LADAR6000 system in treating two difficult patient populations: those with high myopia and those with high astigmatism. METHODS: Two series of eyes were of interest and subsequently enrolled in the study. Thirty-three eyes with preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) > -6.00 diopters (D) (high myopia group) and 25 eyes with preoperative myopic astigmatism > -1.50 D (high myopic astigmatism group) were enrolled. Mean patient age was 35 years in the high myopia group and 33 years in the astigmatism group. For the high myopia group, the mean preoperative MRSE was -8.13 D (range: -6.25 to -12.5 D). For the high myopic astigmatism group, the mean preoperative astigmatism was -1.89 D (range: -1.50 to -4.50 D). All LASIK flaps were made using a femtosecond laser with superior hinge position. Stromal ablation was performed using the LADAR6000 system for conventional treatment. All eyes were targeted for emmetropia. RESULTS: Both groups of eyes experienced excellent clinical outcomes with 100% of eyes within +/-1.00 D of attempted correction at 1 month. For the high myopia group, mean postoperative MRSE was -0.10 D at 1 month. For the high myopic astigmatism group, mean postoperative MRSE was -0.06 D at 1 month. CONCLUSIONS: The LADAR6000 system produced excellent early clinical outcomes in two challenging patient groups using LASIK with femtosecond laser flaps.     

Two-stage laser in situ keratomileusis to correct refractive errors after penetrating keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a two-stage laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedure on eyes with high astigmatism and/or anisometropia after penetrating keratoplasty. METHODS: Eleven postoperative penetrating keratoplasty eyes were included in a prospective, non-controlled study. All patients had at least 4.00 D of astigmatism and/or at least 3.00 D of anisometropia and were spectacle and contact lens intolerant. Two-stage LASIK was performed; in the first stage a hinged corneal flap 160 microm in thickness and 9 mm in diameter was created. After stabilization of corneal shape (1 to 3 months after keratotomy), the corneal flap was lifted and laser refractive treatment (second stage) was performed. RESULTS: After the first stage, a statistically significant reduction in refractive astigmatism (P<.01) was recorded. In all eyes but one, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was maintained or improved after the procedure. Three months after the second stage, refractive astigmatism in 8 of 11 eyes (73%) was within +/- 1.00 D, and spherical equivalent refraction in 9 of 11 eyes (82%) was within +/- 1.00 D of intended correction. Preoperative irregular astigmatism persisted in three patients (3 eyes) who could not be corrected within +/- 1.00 D of refractive astigmatism and/or +/- 1.00 D of intended spherical equivalent refraction. In one eye, an interface infiltrate developed shortly after creation of the flap, and resulted in limited melting. CONCLUSIONS: A two-stage LASIK procedure improved visual acuity and refraction in postoperative penetrating keratoplasty eyes with high astigmatism and/or anisometropia. Complications were uncommon but can lead to loss of vision.     

Efficacy of nonsimultaneous bilateral LASIK after nonsimultaneous bilateral penetrating keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To show if nonsimultaneous bilateral laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is a safe and effective procedure for patients with bilateral penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). METHODS: Five patients (10 eyes), with keratoconus, underwent PKP separately in each eye. After an average PKP follow-up of 45.8 months per eye, (range, 19-92 months), each eye underwent 1-stage LASIK using the Visx Star S3 laser to correct its residual refractive error. We used the cycloplegic refraction as the target for the LASIK surgery. Each patient had his or her eyes done separately 3 weeks apart. RESULTS: Pre-LASIK myopia averaged -3.93 +/- 2.9 D, ranging from -10.00 to +0.75 D. Pre-LASIK astigmatism averaged -3.25 +/- 0.80 D, ranging from -1.75 to -4.50 D. Mean pre-LASIK keratometry was 45.4 +/- 2.6, ranging from 42.2 to 50.5. Uncorrected visual acuity pre-LASIK averaged 20/220, ranging from 20/60 to 20/400. Best-corrected spectacle visual acuity (BCSVA) pre-LASIK averaged 20/22, ranging from 20/20 to 20/30. Nine eyes had no complications. One eye had a flap buttonhole during LASIK, and surgery was aborted. No vision was lost in this eye. Mean follow-up after LASIK in the 9 eyes was 17 +/- 15.2 months, (range, 4-56 months). Mean post-LASIK ametropia in these 9 eyes was +0.25 +/- 0.45 D, ranging from -0.50 to +0.75 D. Average post-LASIK astigmatism was -0.33 +/- 0.38 D, ranging from 0 to -0.75 D. In the 9 treated eyes, uncorrected vision post-LASIK averaged 20/25, ranging from 20/20 to 20/30. BCSVA post-LASIK averaged 20/21, ranging from 20/20 to 20/25. No lines of visual acuity were lost in any of the eyes. CONCLUSION: Young patients who have had bilateral PKP, with good postoperative vision and low levels of myopia, astigmatism, and minimal wound override, are good candidates for bilateral nonsimultaneous LASIK. Further studies can now be done on the performance of bilateral simultaneous LASIK in patients who have had corneal transplant surgery in both of their eyes.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, predictability, and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 69 eyes that had LASIK to correct myopia and 74 eyes that had LASIK to correct myopic astigmatism. The excimer laser keratectomy was performed using a Summit Apex Plus machine. Refraction, visual acuity, and computerized corneal videokeratography data from the preoperative and postoperative examinations were collected. The astigmatic change was calculated by the Alpins vector analysis method. RESULTS: The preoperative spherical equivalent at the glasses plane in the myopia and myopic astigmatism groups was -8.08 diopters (D) and -9.73 D, respectively. At 6 months, the spherical equivalent and residual corneal astigmatism were -0.25 D and 0.85 D, respectively, in the myopia group and -0.71 D and 0.82 D, respectively, in the myopic astigmatism group. In the myopia group, 88% of eyes were within +/-1.0 D of the intended myopia correction and in the myopic astigmatism group, 85% were within +/-1.0 D of the targeted spherical equivalent and 90% were within +/-1.0 D of the intended astigmatism correction. The uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 94.1% of eyes in the myopia group and 92.5% of eyes in the myopic astigmatism group. The SIA magnitude was 0.66 D with the axis randomly distributed in the myopia group. The mean astigmatism correction index was 0.97, the mean magnitude of error was 0.13 D +/- 0.62 (SD), and the mean angle of error was -3.70 +/- 13.73 degrees in the myopic astigmatism group. CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis had similar predictability, safety, and efficacy in the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. The astigmatism correction was effective, but the results suggest that subjective astigmatism of less than 1.0 D need not be treated with the Summit Apex Plus laser.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment for residual myopia and astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment on eyes with residual myopia with or without astigmatism. METHODS: LASIK retreatment was performed on 35 eyes of 23 patients for correction of residual myopia, with or without astigmatism, with a mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction of -2.17+/-0.82 D (range, -1.00 to -3.87 D) and mean refractive astigmatism of -0.55+/-0.61 D (range, 0 to -1.75 D). Retreatment was performed 3 to 18 months after primary LASIK (mean, 5.1+/-2.6 mo). The corneal flap of the previous LASIK was lifted and laser ablation was performed using the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser. Follow-up was 12 months for all eyes. RESULTS: At 1 year after retreatment, manifest spherical equivalent refraction was reduced to a mean -0.23+/-0.28 D (range, 0 to -0.87 D), and refractive astigmatism was reduced to a mean -0.16+/-0.25 D (range, 0 to -0.75 D). Thirty-two eyes (91.5%) had a manifest spherical equivalent refraction within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia, and 33 eyes (94.3%) had 0 to 0.50 D of refractive astigmatism. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 11 eyes (31.4%). Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was not reduced in any eye after retreatment. There were no significant complications. CONCLUSION: LASIK retreatment was effective for correction of residual myopia or astigmatism after primary LASIK. Refractive results were predictable with good stability after 3 months. Lifting the flap during LASIK retreatment was relatively easy to perform and did not result in visual morbidity in eyes treated from 3 up to 18 months after primary LASIK.     

Nomogram adjustment of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism with the Alcon LADARVision system

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive results of conventional (non-wavefront) laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Alcon LADARVision 4000 excimer laser system and nomogram adjustment techniques. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 499 eyes that had LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism was performed. Preoperative manifest spherical equivalent refraction ranged from -0.43 to -6.00 D and preoperative astigmatism ranged from 0 to -4.75 D. Patients were evaluated during 3 months following surgery. RESULTS: One month after surgery, 72% of eyes examined (298/415 eyes) had uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better. Three months after surgery, 83% of eyes examined (216/261 eyes) had UCVA of 20/20 or better. One and three months after surgery, 82% and 83% of eyes, respectively, were within +/-0.50 D of attempted correction; 97% of eyes were within +/-1.00 D at both 1 and 3 months. No eye lost more than 1 line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) at 3 months after surgery. At the 3-month examination, 83% of eyes had UCVA better than or equal to preoperative BSCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional LASIK to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism was safe and effective using the Alcon LADARVision 4000 excimer laser system. Outcomes were substantially improved throughout development of an accurate nomogram, derived from continually updated regression analysis of previous refractive results.     

One year clinical results of photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy for compound myopic astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, and safety of excimer laser photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) to correct compound myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Departments of Ophthalmology, Robert Debré Hospital and Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France. METHODS: This retrospective study included 27 eyes with compound myopic astigmatism treated with a Nidek EC 5000 excimer laser. The refractive results were measured at 1 year, and the cylindrical component was analyzed by the Alpins method. Mean preoperative myopia was -4.50 diopters (D) (range -0.75 to -4.00 D) and mean preoperative cylinder, -1.64 D (range -0.75 to -4.00 D). RESULTS: At 1 year, the spherical equivalent was -0.47 D (range +1.00 to -3.00 D) and residual subjective astigmatism, -0.40 (range -0.25 to -1.50 D). Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better was obtained in 22 of the 27 eyes; 21 eyes were within +/- 1.0 D of emmetropia. Vector analysis showed a mean coefficient adjustment of 1.50 D +/- 0.53 (SD), a mean axis shift of 2.64 +/- 12.10 degrees, and a mean magnitude of error of 0.45 +/- 0.56 D. Haze was absent in 22 eyes and grade 1+ in 5 eyes. Five eyes gained 1 line of best corrected visual acuity and 3 lost 1 line. No patient lost more than 1 line. CONCLUSION: Excimer laser PARK successfully corrected low and moderate myopia combined with up to 4.0 D of astigmatism with a low mean angle of error. To increase the accuracy of toric ablation, specific algorithms for the cylinder component are needed.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for ametropia after penetrating keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in the treatment of refractive errors after penetrating keratoplasty. METHODS: Eight eyes underwent LASIK after a mean 71 months (SD 60) following the initial penetrating keratoplasty. A full ophthalmic assessment was performed before LASIK and at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Mean follow-up was 8.6 months (SD 3.2). RESULTS: No eyes lost any Snellen lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at the latest follow-up. Mean reduction in spherical equivalent refraction was 91% from -6.79 D (SD 4.17) to -0.64 D (SD 1.92) and mean reduction of cylinder was 72% from -6.79 D (SD 3.28) to -1.93 D (SD 1.17) at 6 months. Mean surgically induced astigmatism was 5.50 D (SD 2.42) and the index of surgically induced astigmatism divided by the initial cylinder expressed as a percentage was 81%. Mean outcome indices were: correction index 0.87, index of success 0.31, and angle of error 0.95 degrees. Three eyes (43%) achieved a spherical equivalent refraction of +/-0.50 D and 4 eyes (57%) achieved a spherical equivalent refraction of +/-1.00 D of emmetropia. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of LASIK after penetrating keratoplasty was good compared to incisional or surface based excimer laser methods and has the advantage of reducing the myopic spherical equivalent refraction in addition to astigmatism, thus improving the uncorrected visual acuities.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of residual ametropia after penetrating keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and predictability of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct residual myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). SETTING: Buzard Eye Institute, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. METHODS: Twenty-six eyes had LASIK at least 1 year after PKP. All eyes were followed for at least 6 months after LASIK; 22 eyes were followed for 12 months. Sutures were removed at a mean of 13 months post PKP. Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed with the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb) and the Visx Star excimer laser. Before LASIK, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -4.94 diopters (D) +/- 2.79 (SD) and the mean astigmatism was 2.71 +/- 2.33 D; all eyes had regular astigmatism or slightly decentered, irregular astigmatism. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, the mean postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/30, the mean SE was -0.35 +/- 0.65 D, and the mean residual astigmatism was 1.06 +/- 0.67 D. Eighty-six percent of patients had an SE within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia and a UCVA of 20/40 or better. Ten eyes (39%) had 1 or more enhancements, which were performed a mean of 6 months after the primary LASIK. Significant complications such as wound dehiscence, epithelial ingrowth, and corneal decompensation did not occur. At the last follow-up, 18% of patients lost 1 line of best corrected visual acuity and 27% gained 1 line. CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis appeared to be a reliable and safe procedure to correct residual myopia and astigmatism after PKP.     

Toric laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism using an ablatable mask

BACKGROUND: To assess the results of toric laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) correction of myopic astigmatism. METHODS: A prospective study was performed over a 20 week period for consecutive patients treated for myopic astigmatism. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity, uncorrected visual acuity, spectacle refraction, videokeratography, and complications were recorded. Vector analysis was performed by the ASSORT program. RESULTS: Sixty-five eyes of 42 patients underwent toric LASIK with a Summit Technologies Apex Plus excimer laser. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction at the spectacle plane was -6.24 +/- 2.42 D (range, -1.63 to -14.63 D) and mean pre-operative refractive cylinder magnitude was 1.99 +/- 1.35 D (range, 0.75 to 7.00 D); mean attempted refractive cylinder correction was 1.90 +/- 1.00 D. Six months after LASIK (43 eyes followed), mean spherical equivalent refraction at the spectacle plane was -0.40 +/- 0.55 D and 31 eyes (72.1%) were within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia. At 6 months, mean refractive cylinder magnitude was 0.74 +/- 0.70 D, mean surgically induced astigmatism was 1.46 +/- 0.86 D, mean absolute angle of error was 10.33 degrees, mean astigmatic correction index was 0.93 +/- 0.36 D, and mean index of success was 0.46 +/- 0.39. Uncorrected visual acuity was 6/12 or better in 34 eyes (79.1%) and 6/6 in 15 eyes (35%); spectacle- corrected visual acuity was 6/9 or better in 41 eyes (95.35%). Six eyes (14.0%) lost 1 line of spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 6 months and one eye (2.3%) lost 2 lines. Ten eyes (23.3%) gained 1 line at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Toric LASIK with an ablatable mask using the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser is a safe and relatively accurate procedure for the correction of myopic astigmatism.     

Treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism by customized laser in situ keratomileusis based on corneal topography

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictability, efficacy, and safety of customized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) based on corneal topography in myopia and myopic astigmatism. DESIGN: Prospective, noncomparative interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fourteen patients (eyes) with myopia of -1 to -6 diopters (D) and astigmatism of 0 to -4 D (low myopia group), and 89 patients (eyes) with myopia of -6.10 to -12.00 D and astigmatism of 0 to -4.00 D (high myopia group). INTERVENTION: LASIK was performed with the Hansatome Microkeratome and the Keracor 217 spot-scanning excimer laser (Bausch & Lomb Surgical Technolas, Munich, Germany). Individual ablation patterns were calculated on the basis of elevation data obtained with the Orbscan II corneal topography system (Bausch & Lomb Surgical, Irvine, CA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Manifest spectacle refraction, visual acuity, and change in visual acuity at 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: At 3 months, 51 patients in the low myopia group and 40 patients in the high myopia group were available. In the low (high) myopia group, 96.1% (75.0%) were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia, and uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 82.4% (62.5%), 20/25 or better in 98.0% (70.0%), and 20/40 or better in 100% (95.0%). A loss of two or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity occurred in 3.9% of the low and 5. 0% of the high myopia group. In low myopia, spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/12.5 or better in 5.9% preoperatively and in 13.7% at 3 months and 20/15 or better in 37.3% and 47.1%, respectively. Differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The customized LASIK based on corneal topography used in this study showed high predictability and efficacy in myopia and myopic astigmatism of -1.00 to -6.00 D, and could possibly improve spectacle-corrected visual acuity in myopia of -1.00 to -6.00 D. Predictability and efficacy were somewhat lower in myopia and myopic astigmatism of -6.10 to -12.00 D. In both groups, a small number of patients lost two or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity.     

LASIK for myopia with the Zeiss meditec MEL 80

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate a new high-speed, small spot-scanner laser for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS: Seventy-six consecutive eyes with myopia and myopic astigmatism between -1.00 and -8.25 diopters (D) and up to -2.75 D astigmatism underwent LASIK treatment using the MEL 80 laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). Parameters evaluated were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), residual refractive error, regression of correction, and aberrometry. RESULTS: Mean preoperative BSCVA was 20/20, which improved to 20/18 postoperatively. Postoperative UCVA was 20/20 at 1 month and 20/18 at 1 year. Uncorrected visual acuity > or = 20/20 was achieved in 58 (83%) of 70 eyes at 1 month and in 60 (88%) of 68 eyes at 1 year. The average refractive error before LASIK was -4.41 +/- 1.98 D. The mean residual refractive error was 0.14 +/- 0.31 D at 1 month and 0.13 +/- 0.30 D at 1 year. At 1-month and 1-year follow-up, respectively, 66 (94%) of 70 eyes and 65 (96%) of 68 eyes were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refractive correction. No eye lost two lines. At 1 month 17% of eyes and at 1 year 13% of eyes gained two lines or more. Between 1-month and 1-year follow-up, 100% of eyes were stable. Mean root-mean-square high order aberration changed from 0.20 microm preoperatively to 0.28 microm postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The MEL 80 is effective and safe in the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis after penetrating keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). SETTING: Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. METHODS: Fourteen eyes of 13 patients who had LASIK after PKP were retrospectively reviewed. The interval between LASIK and PKP was at least 1 year, and the follow-up after LASIK was also at least 1 year. All patients had a stable refractive error for a minimum of 6 months after all sutures were removed, regular and symmetric topographic astigmatism, and a minimal ultrasonic central corneal pachymetry of 500 microm. The Chiron Automatic Corneal Shaper and the Meditec Aesculap MEL 60 excimer laser were used. RESULTS: At 12 months, mean myopia decreased from -5.33 diopters (D) +/- 4.22 (SD) to 0.19 +/- 1.71 D, mean hyperopia decreased from +5.04 +/- 3.32 D to + 0.42 +/- 0.46 D, and mean astigmatism decreased from 5.37 +/- 2.12 D to 2.82 +/- 2.42 D (47.5% of mean percentage reduction). Retreatment was necessary in 42.9% of eyes because of cylindrical undercorrection. Uncorrected visual acuity improved in 11 eyes (78.6%). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved in 6 eyes (42.8%) and was maintained in 4 eyes (28.6%); 5 eyes (35.7%) lost 1 Snellen line. Intraoperative complications included 1 buttonhole flap. Postoperative complications included interface epithelial ingrowth at the periphery (2 eyes) and pseudophakic retinal detachment 2 years after LASIK (1 eye). CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis after PKP safely and predictably corrected the spherical component of the refraction. However, the predictability of LASIK in correcting post-PKP astigmatism was poor.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty

Purpose

To determine the safety and effectiveness of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for visual rehabilitation of residual myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty.

Correction of myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty with laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: We evaluated whether laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) was a safe and effective treatment for myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of medical records of all the patients who underwent LASIK following PK at the University of Minnesota between January 1999 and March 2000. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (20 eyes) underwent LASIK following PK between January 1999 and March 2000. Mean age of the patients at the time of LASIK was 37 years (range, 20-62). Keratoconus was the indication for PK in the majority of the eyes (73.7%). Anisometropia and/or contact lens intolerance was the indication for LASIK following PK. No intraoperative complications occurred. Following LASIK, the best spectacle-corrected visual acuity remained within 1 line of preoperative visual acuity in 94.7% of the eyes. The mean sphere was reduced by 3.93 diopters (80.0%) and the mean cylinder was reduced by 2.83 diopters (69.9%) from the preoperative values at the last follow-up visit. Uncorrected visual acuity became 20/40 or better in 73.7% of the eyes after LASIK. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK is a safe procedure in eyes in which PK has previously been performed. LASIK is effective in the treatment of myopia and astigmatism following PK.     

Comparison of LADARVision and Visx Star S3 laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes in myopia and hyperopia

PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes with 2 commonly used excimer lasers, the Autonomous LADARVision (LV) (Alcon Laboratories Inc.) and the Visx Star S3 (S3), in the performance of myopic and hyperopic astigmatic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Zale Lipshy University Hospital Laser Center for Vision, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center 3-surgeon cohort comparison, 100 consecutive LV-treated myopic eyes with a mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) of -3.22 diopters (D) (range 0 to -6.00 D) (mean astigmatism 0.95 D [range 0 to 4.00 D]) were compared with 100 consecutive S3-treated eyes with a similar MRSE (mean MRSE -3.19 D; mean astigmatism 0.66 D [range 0 to 2.75 D]). Forty-one consecutive LV-treated hyperopic eyes with a mean MRSE of +2.59 D (range +1.00 to +6.00 D) (mean astigmatism 0.89 D [range 0 to 3.50 D]) were compared with 25 consecutive S3-treated eyes with a similar MRSE (mean MRSE +2.70 D; mean astigmatism 0.87 D [range 0 to 2.75 D]). The following outcomes were compared: uncorrected visual acuity, refractive predictability and stability, gain or loss of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, and need for enhancement. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in outcomes were found between lasers in the treatment of hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism. No outcome differences between lasers were found in the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. CONCLUSION: The LV and S3 lasers yielded equivalent results in myopic LASIK between 0 and -6.00 D; however, the LADARVision yielded statistically significantly better results in hyperopic LASIK between +1.00 and +6.00 D.