Quality of life and recurrence concern in survivors of head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: A cohort of 3-year survivors of head and neck cancer was evaluated for persistent quality of life (QOL) concerns and long-term treatment effects. STUDY DESIGN: Mailed questionnaire. METHODS: The questionnaire with the University of Washington Quality of Life (UWQOL) scale, the Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scale, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Head and Neck (FACT-HN) scale and locally prepared questions was sent to 111 3-year disease-free survivors. Analysis was performed to statistically evaluate the effect of stage, site, treatment type, surgery, and cancer concern on QOL. Current smoking information was gathered. RESULTS: Seventy-two survivors completed the questionnaire. Advanced stage was correlated with lower QOL scores in the domains of disfigurement, chewing ability, speech, and eating in public. QOL scores did not vary by initial tumor site. Patients treated with irradiation alone had statistically better QOL scores than those treated with combined surgery/radiation therapy in the pain, disfigurement, chewing, and speech domains. Laryngectomy and composite resection survivors reported lower QOL scores than patients treated with irradiation alone. A low level of cancer concern persisted in about half of the long-term survivors. Cancer concern was associated with continued pain, disfigurement, and limitations on eating in public. Three-quarters of the tobacco users had quit by the time of the questionnaire. Nevertheless, the patients were not thoroughly convinced that tobacco had caused their cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survivors of head and neck cancer experience QOL effects well after completion of treatment. Effects are most pronounced in survivors who required combined surgery/radiation therapy. Continuing low levels of cancer concern persist in about half of the survivors. Many cancer survivors successfully quit smoking.     

Assessing Penetration and Aspiration: How Do Videofluoroscopy and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing Compare?

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to investigate whether the type of dysphagia examination (fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing [FEES] or videofluoroscopy) influences the scoring of penetration and aspiration. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single-blind study. METHODS: Fifteen dysphagic participants were recruited and underwent one FEES and one videofluoroscopy examination, performed and recorded simultaneously. Fifteen independent raters from 12 centers scored penetration and aspiration from recordings using the Penetration Aspiration Scale. Raters were blind to participant details, the pairing of the FEES and videofluoroscopy recordings, and the other raters' scores. Interrater and intrarater reliability were analyzed using weighted kappa. RESULTS: The Penetration Aspiration Scale scores were significantly higher for the FEES recordings than for the videofluoroscopy recordings (ANOVA P < .001). The mean difference between the FEES and videofluoroscopy penetration aspiration scores for the same swallows was 1.15 points. Interrater and intrarater reliability ranged from 0.64 to 0.79 (weighted kappa). CONCLUSIONS: Penetration aspiration is perceived to be greater (more severe) from FEES than videofluoroscopy images. The clinical implications are discussed.     

Laryngeal penetration and aspiration during swallowing after the treatment of advanced oropharyngeal cancer

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether laryngeal penetration and aspiration in oropharyngeal cancer survivors differ by treatment group. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of patients with stage III or IV oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma who were at least 12 months removed from combined modality therapy and clinically free of disease. SUBJECTS: Potential subjects were stratified by tumor site and tumor T stage to achieve a similar comparison between chemoradiotherapy (n = 10) and surgery/radiotherapy (n = 11) groups. Validated instruments used to evaluate swallowing included the Penetration-Aspiration Scale and the M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. RESULTS: Patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy demonstrated greater airway protection according to Penetration-Aspiration Scale scores than those treated with surgery and radiotherapy on 5-mL (P = .02), 10-mL (P = .04), and 20-mL (P = .04) liquid barium swallows. Also, the oropharyngeal chemoradiotherapy group had better self-perceived swallowing ability than the surgery-radiotherapy group on the basis of the M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (P = .02). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that patients with oropharyngeal cancer who successfully complete chemoradiotherapy protocols without surgical salvage retain greater airway protection during swallowing and better swallowing-related quality of life than patients treated with primary surgery and radiotherapy.     

头颈肿瘤与外科治疗对患者生存质量的影响

目的探讨头颈肿瘤及外科治疗对患者生存质量（quality of life，QOL）的影响。方法用头颈肿瘤行为状态量表（performance status scale for head and neckc ancer patients，PSS-HN），癌症治疗功能评估调查问卷（functional assessment of cancer therapy—head and neck，FACT—H＆N），对27例喉癌、14例舌癌和8例放疗后局部复发的鼻咽癌患者，共49例病例进行评估，探讨不同部位的肿瘤对患者QOL的影响；肿瘤对患者生理状况、功能状况、情感状况、社会和家庭状况的影响；不同的外科治疗方式对QOL的影响以及QOL在于术治疗前后不同时间点的变化。结果头颈肿瘤患者在患病后QOL下降；不同部位的肿瘤对患者QOL的影响程度不同，以舌癌对患者的QOL影响最大（PSS-HN评分比较P=0．0361，FACT—H＆N评分比较P=0．0487）。肿瘤对患者的生理状况、功能状况、情感状况、社会和家庭状况等各个方面均有影响，尤以对情感状况影响最大（FACT—H＆N评分比较F=2．78，P=0．0311）。外科治疗可使患者的QOL较手术前下降，术后可随时问而逐步改善，术后6个月接近术前水平（PSS—HN评分比较t=2．03，P=0．1120；FACT—H＆N评分比较t=1．03，P=0．1180）。不同的手术方式与修复手段对QOL的影响不同，喉部分切除术组在术后6个月FACT—H＆N为107．20分，喉全切除术组在手术后6个月为97．71分，二者的差异有统计学意义（t=3．02，P=0．0430）。舌癌直接拉拢缝合组在术后6个月FACT—H＆N为119．24分，舌癌游离前臂皮瓣修复者在术后6个月为111．39分，其差异有统计学意义（t=3．00，P=0．0472）。结论头颈肿瘤患者的QOL可以用问卷、量表进行评估；可以通过治疗方案的选择、手术方式与修复手段的选择进行干预。     

Pretreatment, preoperative swallowing exercises may improve dysphagia quality of life

OBJECTIVES: Dysphagia is commonly associated with head and neck cancer treatment. Traditional dysphagia management strategies focus on post-treatment therapy. This study evaluated the utility of pretreatment swallowing exercises in improving post-treatment swallowing quality of life (QOL). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study and cross-sectional QOL analysis. METHODS: This study includes 37 patients who underwent primary radiation or combined chemoradiation treatment for newly diagnosed hypopharyngeal, laryngeal, or oropharyngeal primary tumors at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Of the 37, 25 patients underwent swallowing exercises beginning 2 weeks prior to the start of radiation. The M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) was administered an average of 14 months after treatment to assess the success of the protocol. Analysis of QOL scores related to gender, primary site, stage, and race were obtained. RESULTS: Patients who performed pretreatment swallowing exercises (n = 25) showed improvement in the overall MDADI score (P = .0002) compared to the control population (n = 12) who underwent post-treatment therapy. Furthermore, a separate analysis of individual domains of the MDADI (global, emotional, functional, and physical) demonstrated improved quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of pretreatment swallowing education and exercise may improve dysphagia-specific QOL in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiation and/or chemoradiation therapy.     

A UK multi‐centre pilot study of speech and swallowing outcomes following head and neck cancer

Speech and swallowing are important components of health‐related quality of life following head and neck cancer treatment. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the value of prospective multi‐centre evaluation by Speech and Language Therapists and to compare health‐related quality of life with speech and swallowing impairments. The University of Washington Head and Neck questionnaire version 4 (UW‐QOL) and Therapy Outcome Measures (TOM) were rated before and 6 months after cancer treatment in 95 patients from 12 centres. There was deterioration in TOM scores at 6 months. Pretreatment UW‐QOL swallowing was ranked equal first, with speech fourth. At 6 months speech was first and swallowing second. There were positive correlations between UW‐QOL swallowing and TOM dysphagia and between UW‐QOL speech and TOM laryngectomy, voice, phonology and dysarthria disorders. Both outcome measures are suitable for routine practice. Adaptation of TOM scales for use with head and neck cancer patients may improve sensitivity, validity and therapist compliance.     

Aspiration in children with CHARGE syndrome

Patients with Coloboma, Heart defect, choanal Atresia, Retarded development, Genitorenal and Ear abnormalities (CHARGE) syndrome have been reported to be at high risk for aspiration and swallowing difficulties. Aspiration has been implicated as the most common cause of mortality in these patients. To date, however, aspiration and swallowing disorders in CHARGE patients have not been independently studied. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of aspiration and swallowing dysfunction in children with CHARGE syndrome. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 30 children with CHARGE syndrome was performed. RESULTS: Eighteen (60%) children had aspiration observed on video swallow study (VSS), flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), and/or had otherwise unexplained bronchiectasis noted on CT scan of the chest. Twenty-four children (80%) had evidence of abnormal swallowing such as laryngeal penetration, dyscoordination, poor bolus mobility, or pooling of secretions. CONCLUSION: Aspiration and swallowing dysfunction are common in children with CHARGE syndrome. Formal evaluation of swallowing function should be part of the standard otolaryngologic examination for these patients.     

Detection of voice changes due to aspiration via acoustic voice analysis

Objective

Aspiration can occur during swallowing. The present study investigated the feasibility of identifying aspiration risk (AR) via acoustic voice parameters.

Quality of life assessment in nonmelanoma cervicofacial skin cancer

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Health-related quality of life (QOL) assessment of patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer is poorly understood. The objectives of the study were to determine the general QOL of patients with cervicofacial skin cancer and to identify patient, clinical, and preventive behavior variables associated with patients' QOL. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of 121 consecutive patients (65 female and 56 male patients) presenting to a dermatological Mohs surgery clinic with nonmelanoma skin cancer of the head and neck. METHODS: Quality of life assessment was performed before counseling or treatment. Measures included the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). RESULTS: Both instruments demonstrated good internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's alpha (SF-36, alpha = 0.45-0.91; FACT-G, alpha = 0.61-0.90). The SF-36 scores were similar to historical norms. Bivariate analysis indicated significant correlation coefficients between QOL and patients' coexisting illnesses and medical risk factors. Sun-protective behaviors were associated with better QOL. The relationship appeared to be minimally influenced by patients' sociodemographic characteristics and disease-related variables (size, location, extent). CONCLUSIONS: Sun-protective behaviors were positively associated with certain QOL subscale scores in the population in the study. General QOL instruments demonstrated minimal impact of nonmelanoma skin cancer on patients at initial diagnosis. However, general measures may not be sensitive to the impact of nonmelanoma skin cancer. The development of a more disease-specific instrument may be necessary to evaluate this disease process.     

Acute and long-term dysphagia in critically ill patients with severe sepsis: results of a prospective controlled observational study

Dysphagia is a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients treated in intensive care units (ICUs). Structured otorhinolaryngological data on dysphagia in ICU survivors with severe sepsis are missing. In a prospective study, 30 ICU patients with severe sepsis and thirty without sepsis as control group were examined using bedside fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing after 14 days in the ICU (T1) and 4 months after onset of critical illness (T2). Swallowing dysfunction was assessed using the Penetration–Aspiration Scale (PAS). The Functional Oral Intake Scale was applied to evaluate the diet needed. Primary endpoint was the burden of dysphagia defined as PAS score >5. At T1, 19 of 30 severe sepsis patients showed aspiration with a PAS score >5, compared to 7 of 30 in critically ill patients without severe sepsis (p = 0.002). Severe sepsis and tracheostomy were independent risk factors for severe dysphagia with aspiration (PAS > 5) at T1 (p = 0.042 and 0.006, respectively). 4-month mortality (T2) was 57 % in severe sepsis patients compared to 20 % in patients without severe sepsis (p = 0.006). At T2, more severe sepsis survivors were tracheostomy-dependent and needed more often tube or parenteral feeding (p = 0.014 and p = 0.040, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed tracheostomy at T1 as independent risk factor for severe dysphagia at T2 (p = 0.030). Severe sepsis appears to be a relevant risk factor for long-term dysphagia. An otorhinolaryngological evaluation of dysphagia at ICU discharge is mandatory for survivors of severe critical illness to plan specific swallowing rehabilitation programs.     

Evaluation of chronological changes in videofluorographic findings after transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery to reveal mechanism of dysphagia

ObjectivesTransoral surgery preserves good swallowing function in most cases, however, postoperative dysphagia sometimes leads to fatal complication such as aspiration pneumonia. We investigated the chronological changes in swallowing function have not been revealed relationship with dysphagia. The primary aim of this study was to reveal the mechanism of dysphagia following transoral surgery by analyzing chronological videofluorography (VF) findings. Moreover, the secondary aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between mechanism of dysphagia and risk factors of patients to clarify the risk for dysphagia lead to prevention of postoperative complications.Methods22 patients who underwent transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery (TOVS) for either supraglottic or hypopharyngeal cancer were evaluated swallowing function. We performed VF during the preoperative, postoperative acute, and stable phases and investigated the chronological changes in the VF findings. The following parameters were evaluated by VF: horizontal distance of laryngeal movement, vertical distance of laryngeal elevation, laryngeal elevation delay time (LEDT), Bolus Residue Scale (BRS) scores, and Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores. Additionally, we evaluated risk factors for postoperative aspiration by investigating relationships between preoperative VF parameters, age of patients, history of radiation therapy, resection area, tumor (T) stage, postoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and PAS and BRS scores.ResultsThe median time at which oral feeding was resumed in this study was 9 (2–200) days. The patients who had postoperative acute PAS scores of 4 and above exhibited delays in resuming oral ingestion after surgery. TOVS did not impair laryngeal elevation and LEDT; however, the BRS and PAS scores temporarily worsened in the acute phase compared to the preoperative scores. These scores almost recovered to their preoperative states in the stable phase, and both the BRS and PAS scores worsened and recovered concurrently. Patients who exhibited poor vertical distance in laryngeal elevation as observed via preoperative VF or who had histories of radiation therapy had worse PAS scores in postoperative acute phase VF. Patients with broad resection areas had worse BRS scores in postoperative acute phase VF.ConclusionTOVS didn't impair the function of laryngeal elevation and elicitation of the swallowing reflex whereas pharyngeal bolus clearance, laryngeal penetration, and aspiration temporarily deteriorated concurrently but eventually almost recovered to their baseline values.Patients with histories of radiotherapy, poor laryngeal elevation, and broad resection areas are at the risk of postoperative dysphagia after TOVS. Patients with these risk factors need appropriate evaluation before resuming postoperative oral intake.     

Videofluoroscopic findings in dysphagic patients with cricopharyngeal dysfunction: before and after open cricopharyngeal myotomy

OBJECTIVES: Functional outcomes after open cricopharyngeal myotomy (CPM) for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) and cricopharyngeal dysfunction without diverticulum (CPD) have not been uniformly measured by videofluorographic swallow study (VFSS). Here we characterize preoperative VFSS findings in these groups and evaluate the effect of CPM on swallowing via postoperative VFSS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of paired preoperative and postoperative VFSS results from 50 patients (36 with ZD and 14 with CPD) over 6 years. Semiquantitative scales were used to assess 1) degree of stasis in the pharyngeal recesses; 2) degree of narrowing at the pharyngoesophageal sphincter (PES); 3) aspiration; and 4) diverticular size. Findings were compared between the groups and across subjects. RESULTS: Pharyngeal stasis was more severe in subjects with CPD than in subjects with ZD, both before and after CPM (p = .02 and p = .0002, respectively). The CPM improved PES narrowing in both groups (p = .03; p = .06) and reduced diverticular size in the ZD group (p < .001), but it did not significantly reduce the stasis severity or the proportion of patients with aspiration. CONCLUSIONS: According to VFSS, CPM opens up the PES and decreases diverticular size. More severe stasis in CPD suggests that diffuse pharyngeal weakness may play a role in this disease, and may partially explain the variable post-CPM outcomes that have been observed in CPD.     

Videomanofluorometric study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the time-course changes of swallowing function in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) by videomanofluorometry. STUDY DESIGN: Videomanofluorometry was conducted on 21 patients with ALS, who were divided into five groups according to type of disease and according to the length of time following the appearance of bulbar symptoms. METHODS: Videomanofluorometry, which is videofluoroscopic and manometric study conducted simultaneously, was performed on patients in the five groups, and swallowing function in each group was evaluated. Some of the patients were followed up by videomanofluorometry performed several times, and their swallowing function changes over time were investigated. RESULTS: A decrease of swallowing pressure first appeared in the oropharynx, then the hypopharynx became involved. Oropharyngeal swallowing pressure had already decreased to approximately 50 mm Hg within 6 months after the appearance of bulbar symptoms; however, hypopharyngeal swallowing pressure was relatively maintained until 1 year after the onset of bulbar symptoms. Most of the patients with ALS maintained normal upper esophageal sphincter relaxation, but upper esophageal sphincter spasm was seen in some patients with ALS. Aspiration was seen in eight cases, five of which showed upper esophageal sphincter spasm. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ALS gradually face the danger of aspiration as decreases of oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal swallowing pressure progress. Upper esophageal sphincter spasm occurs in some patients with ALS, and it is an important cause of aspiration. Both videofluoroscopic and manometric evaluation are necessary to assess these conditions, and they are quite useful for follow-up of swallowing function in patients with ALS.     

Video fluoroscopy of the swallowing act following partial supraglottic laryngectomy

Videofluoroscopy of swallowing was performed in 21 patients who had undergone partial horizontal laryngectomy. Food residues were present in most of these patients. Residues of liquid contrast were observed in 85.7% of the patients and residues of consistent contrast in 61.5% of the patients. In most cases, food remnants were to be found in the glossolaryngeal recess. The mechanisms of compensation, additional swallowing, and expiration after swallowing are an important factor in clearing the throat of any residual food. Impaired clearing of food residues results in aspiration. Aspiration of liquid contrast was observed in 76.2% of the patients and aspiration of consistent contrast in 19.1% of the patients (p less than 0.001). Aspiration after swallowing was observed in most of the patients.     

Treatment Outcomes and Quality of Life in Oropharyngeal Cancer after Surgery-based versus Radiation-based Treatment

Objectives

Advances in reconstruction and conservative surgery and the importance of quality of life (QOL) encouraged this reevaluation of surgery-based treatments for oropharyngeal cancer. We tried to compare treatment outcome and QOL after surgery-based versus radiation-based treatment in oropharyngeal cancer.

Methods

The 133 eligible patients were divided into surgery-based and radiotherapy (RT)-based treatment groups. Medical records were reviewed, and EORTC QLQ-C30 and HN65 questionnaires were completed for survivors. Three-year overall survivals, disease-free survivals, locoregional control rates, and QOL scores were compared between the two groups.

Results

Demographic data and overall stages were not significantly different between the two groups, and all survival rates were non-significantly different, either. The scores for most QOL items were equivalent, however, for a few items, scores were significantly better in surgery-based group.

Conclusion

The surgery-based group achieved equivalent treatment outcomes and slightly better QOL scores than the RT-based group. The results of this study suggest that surgery could still be considered as a first-line therapy for oropharyngeal cancer.     

Dysphagia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Pretreatment Evaluation,Predictive Factors,and Assessment during Radio-Chemotherapy,Recommendations

Progress in head and neck cancer (HNC) therapies has improved tumor response, loco-regional control, and survival. However, treatment intensification also increases early and late toxicities. Dysphagia is an underestimated symptom in HNC patients. Impairment of swallowing process could cause malnutrition, dehydration, aspiration, and pneumonia. A comprehensive literature review finalized in May 2012 included searches of electronic databases (Medline, Embase, and CAB abstracts) and scientific societies meetings materials (American Society of Clinical Oncology, Associazione Italiana Radioterapia Oncologica, Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Cervico-Cefalica, American Head and Neck Society, and European Society for Medical Oncology). Hand-searches of HNC journals and reference lists were carried out. Approximately one-third of dysphagia patients developed pneumonia requiring treatment. Aspiration pneumonia associated mortality ranged from 20% to 65%. Unidentified dysphagia caused significant morbidity, increased mortality, and decreased the quality of life. In this review we underline definition, causes, predictive factors of dysphagia and report on pretreatment and on-treatment evaluation, suggesting some key points to avoid underestimation. A multi-parameter assessment of swallowing problems may allow an earlier diagnosis. An appropriate evaluation might lead to a better treatment of both symptoms and cancer.     

Swallowing function in patients with head and neck cancer prior to treatment

OBJECTIVE: To define the site-specific swallowing dysfunctions of patients with head and neck cancer with respect to tumor site and stage by, videofluoroscopic oropharyngeal motility (OPM) study prior to initiation of treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective survey. SETTING: Academic university institution. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of 79 patients with stage III or IV head and neck cancer without prior treatment or tracheotomy. Patients were divided into groups according to tumor site: oral cavity (n = 7), oropharynx (n = 27), larynx (n = 24), and hypopharynx (n = 10). Patients with sinonasal, nasopharyngeal, and unknown primary carcinomas served as the comparison group (n = 11). INTERVENTION: All patients underwent OPM study prior to treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Parameters of swallowing function, including oral impairment, pharyngeal impairment, cervical esophageal impairment, aspiration, and Swallowing Performance Status Scale (SPSS) score (a global measure of swallowing function) were extracted from the pretreatment OPM study and analyzed with reference to tumor site, T stage, and overall stage. The relations between tumor site and area or degree of dysfunction, and between stage of disease and area or degree of dysfunction were analyzed using chi2 and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: Aspiration status, cervical esophageal impairment, and pharyngeal impairment examined as a function of disease site showed statistically significant differences between groups, with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal sites revealing the most severe dysfunctions. The SPSS score did not correlate with tumor site, T stage, or overall stage. Other OPM parameters analyzed as a function of T stage and overall stage revealed no consistent patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Hypopharyngeal and laryngeal disease sites have a high degree of pretreatment functional impairment. The SPSS score is a good global measure of swallowing dysfunction. In addition, significant site-specific dysfunctions are found when the OPM study is analyzed via its separate parameters. It is therefore critical that posttreatment function is compared with baseline pretreatment dysfunction.     

Aspiration following CO(2) laser-assisted supraglottoplasty

OBJECTIVE: To review the incidence, risk factors, and treatment of aspiration following CO(2) laser-assisted supraglottoplasty for severe laryngomalacia (LM). DESIGN: IRB approved retrospective study of pediatric patients with severe LM treated with CO(2) laser supraglottoplasty over a 5-year period. SETTING: Tertiary pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Indication for supraglottoplasty was respiratory distress in 90% of patients and/or failure to thrive in 19%. INTERVENTIONS: All children underwent bilateral CO(2) laser supraglottoplasty and were assessed postoperatively with swallow evaluation by a speech pathologist. Videoflouroscopic evaluation was utilized to confirm aspiration and guide management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Aspiration, treatment required to manage aspiration, duration of treatment required. RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent (20/52) of patients had postoperative aspiration. Aspiration was demonstrated on videoflouroscopic swallow study (VFSS) after supraglottoplasty is 28% (12/43). All patients with newly diagnosed aspiration had treatment with thickened and/or nasogastric feedings with mean resolution time of 6 months. In nine children with preoperative aspiration, eight (89%) had postoperative aspiration and seven required gastrostomy tube placement for feeding management. All individuals requiring gastrostomy for aspiration management had neurological conditions. In the absence of preoperative clinically evident aspiration, children with neurological conditions have an equivalent rate of postoperative aspiration as healthy children. The only risk factor for postoperative aspiration was preoperative aspiration. CONCLUSION: Aspiration is more common after CO(2) laser-assisted supraglottoplasty than previously recognized. In otherwise healthy children, postoperative aspiration is of short duration and can be treated with conservative measures. Optimal treatment after supraglottoplasty includes screening for and management of aspiration in conjunction with a speech pathologist.     

Relationship Between Quality of Life and Depression in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

Objective: This study describes the relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and depression in patients following major surgery for head and neck cancer. Design: Cross-sectional study using medical chart review, patient interview, and test administration. Method: Fifty patients were evaluated 6 months to 6 years following surgery using one global HRQOL measure (The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General [FACT-G]); three disease-specific measures of HRQOL (the HN module of the FACT [FACT-HNS], The University of Washington Quality of Life Scale [UWQOL], and The Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer); and one measure of depression (The Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]). Results: The study population showed a high occurrence of depressive symptoms (22%). A negative correlation existed between the BDI and HRQOL as measured by the FACT-G (r = ?0.49, P < .001) and the UWQOL (r = ?0.44, P = .003). When somatic symptoms of depression were removed, the BDI remained correlated with HRQOL and was most highly correlated with the Emotional Well-Being (EWB) subscale of the FACT-G (r = ?0.42, P = .003). There was no correlation between clinician judgments of EWB and any patient-rated measures of HRQOL or depression. Conclusions: Results demonstrate an inverse relationship between patient-reported HRQOL and depression. The lack of correlation between physician and patient ratings of HRQOL and EWB stresses the importance of obtaining patient ratings in addition to traditional clinician ratings when assessing outcomes. Finally, the multidimensional construction of the FACT with its specific subscales may make it a useful clinical tool for assessing patient status and augmenting patient interviews.