Multicenter randomized trial comparing sequential with concomitant administration of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM-9903) phase III study.

PURPOSE: This randomized, multicenter, phase III trial evaluated whether sequential doxorubicin and docetaxel (A-->T) reduced hematological toxicity, especially febrile neutropenia, compared with concomitant (AT) administration as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive three cycles of doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) every 21 days followed by three cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2), every 21 days (A-->T) or six cycles of the combination doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (AT) every 21 days. Patients previously treated with anthracyclines received two cycles of doxorubicin followed by four cycles of docetaxel (A-->T), or three cycles of AT followed by three cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) every 21 days. RESULTS: Febrile neutropenia was less common in the A-->T arm (29.3% of patients, 6.9% of cycles) compared with the AT arm (47.8% of patients, 14.8% of cycles; P =.02 and P =.0004, respectively). Asthenia, diarrhea, and fever occurred more frequently in the AT arm. The overall responses rates were 61% in the A-->T arm (95% CI, 50% to 72%) and 51% in the AT arm (95% CI, 39% to 63%). The median duration of response was 8.7 months (A-->T) and 7.6 months (AT); the median time to progression was 10.5 months (A-->T) and 9.2 months (AT); the median overall survival was 22.3 months (A-->T) and 21.8 months (AT); and no significant differences were found. CONCLUSION: A-->T significantly reduced febrile neutropenia compared with AT in MBC patients and maintains comparable antitumoral efficacy. A-->T represents a valid option for the treatment of MBC.     

Docetaxel plus epirubicin is a highly active, well-tolerated, first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of a large, multicentre phase II study

Purpose In this multicentre phase II study, the efficacy and safety profile of the combination of docetaxel and epirubicin as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were evaluated.Methods Epirubicin (75 mg/m²) and docetaxel (75 mg/m²) were given intravenously once every 3 weeks for six cycles to 133 patients with MBC.Results The overall clinical response rate was 67% (complete and partial responses were 23% and 44%, respectively). The median time to progression was 10.8 months (95% CI 9.7–12.6) and the median overall survival was 19.5 months. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was administered to 32% of patients and in 22% of cycles. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 35% of patients and febrile neutropenia in 19%. The most frequent grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities (as percent of patients) were asthenia (6%), vomiting (5%) and nausea (5%). No patients developed congestive heart failure.Conclusions The combination of docetaxel and epirubicin was highly active as first-line treatment for MBC and showed a manageable toxicity profile.     

A Phase II Randomized Crossover Study of Liposomal Doxorubicin Versus Weekly Docetaxel in the First-line Treatment of Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer

PurposeWe aim to compare the efficacy and toxicity of liposomal doxorubicin and weekly docetaxel as first-line treatments for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Patients and MethodsPatients who had received no previous chemotherapy for MBC were eligible. Previous hormonal therapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiation therapy were allowed. Patients were randomized to receive liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m² intravenously [I.V.] every 28 days or weekly docetaxel 36 mg/m² I.V. days 1, 8, and 15, repeated every 28 days. Patients with objective response or stable disease after 2 cycles continued treatment until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. At progression, patients were allowed to cross over to the other regimen. The trial was designed to detect a true difference of 10% in response rate with an 80% power.ResultsBetween March 2001 and July 2007, 102 patients were randomized. The 2 groups had similar demographics; 68% of patients had received previous adjuvant chemotherapy. Liposomal doxorubicin and weekly docetaxel produced similar objective response rates (28% vs. 31%), disease control rates (48% vs. 44%), and progression-free survival (6.5 months vs. 5.5 months). Both agents were well tolerated. Both agents produced crossover responses as second-line treatment (liposomal doxorubicin, 35%; weekly docetaxel, 14%).ConclusionLiposomal doxorubicin is well tolerated and has activity similar to weekly docetaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with MBC.     

Dose-escalation study of docetaxel in combination with mitoxantrone as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of docetaxel in combination with mitoxantrone in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one chemotherapy-naive patients with MBC (median age, 61 years) were enrolled. Thirty-eight (93%) had performance status (World Health Organization [WHO]) 0, 29 (71%) were postmenopausal, and 21 (51%) had estrogen receptor-negative tumors. Patients received escalated doses of docetaxel (75 to 100 mg/m2) on day 1 and mitoxantrone (8 to 22 mg/m2) on day 8. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 217 chemotherapy cycles were administered. Without recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) support, the MTD1 occurred at the first dose level (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2); DLTs were febrile neutropenia, grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 5 days, and grade 3 diarrhea. With prophylactic rhG-CSF, the MTD2 was docetaxel 100 mg/m2 and mitoxantrone 20 mg/m2; DLTs were febrile neutropenia and grade 4 neutropenia. Nine (22%) patients developed neutropenia after the first cycle of treatment. A total of 19 episodes of febrile neutropenia (9% of the cycles) occurred during the whole period of the study; there were no toxic deaths. At high docetaxel (100 mg/m2) and mitoxantrone (> 12 mg/m2) dose levels, a significant decrease of the absolute lymphocyte number was observed; immunophenotyping revealed that all lymphocyte subpopulations were reduced. Grades 2 and 3 neurosensory toxicity occurred in six patients (15%) and one patient (2%), respectively. No cardiac toxicity was observed. Nine complete responses (22%) and 23 partial responses (56%) were achieved (overall response rate, 78%; 95% confidence interval, 62.5% to 88.8%). The median duration of response was 12.5 months, and the median time to tumor progression was 14.5 months. CONCLUSION: The reported combination of docetaxel and mitoxantrone with G-CSF support is a safe, intensified, well-tolerated, and effective regimen as first-line treatment in patients with MBC.     

North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N0432: phase II trial of docetaxel with capecitabine and bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundDocetaxel (T; Taxotere) with capecitabine (X) is active against metastatic breast cancer (MBC); bevacizumab (BV) has demonstrated efficacy with taxanes in the first-line setting. This study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of TX-BV in patients with MBC.Patients and methodsIn this single-arm, multicenter phase II study, patients received first-line bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 75 mg/m² on day 1 and capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice per day on days 1–14 every 21 days. Primary and secondary end points were tumor response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity.ResultsA total of 45 assessable patients received TX-BV for a median of seven cycles. Two complete and 20 partial responses were observed (overall RR 49%); nine patients had stable disease >6 months, for a clinical benefit rate of 69%. Median response duration was 11.8 months. Median OS and PFS were 28.4 and 11.1 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events included hand–foot syndrome (29%), fatigue (20%), febrile neutropenia (18%), and diarrhea (18%). In cycles 3–10, median dose levels of docetaxel and capecitabine were 60 mg/m² and 660 mg/m², respectively.ConclusionTX-BV demonstrated significant activity; dose modifications were required to manage drug-related toxic effects.     

Phase II study of sequential administration of docetaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a sequential administration of four cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) followed by four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC; 60/600 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks), with subsequent consolidation with docetaxel or AC, as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients received 443 cycles of chemotherapy (median, 11 cycles/patient; range, 1 to 13 cycles). A total of 267 cycles of docetaxel (60.3%) and 176 of AC (39.7%) were given. Consolidation therapy was given to 33 patients (29 with docetaxel). RESULTS: Grade 4 neutropenia was the most frequent toxicity (83% of patients). This was not cumulative and was rarely complicated by febrile neutropenia or severe infection. The nonhematologic safety profile was favorable: there were no grade 4 adverse events, and grade 3 episodes were infrequent. Docetaxel-specific toxicities were generally not severe. With a median cumulative doxorubicin dose of 397 mg/m(2) (range, 150 to 543 mg/m(2)), two incidences of unrelated congestive heart failure after further treatment with anthracyclines and two of asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction decrease were observed. Among the 42 assessable patients, five (12%) had complete and 25 (60%) had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 71% (95% confidence interval, 55% to 84%). Median duration of response was 53 weeks (range, 12 to 72 weeks), and median time to progression was 46 weeks (range, 3 of 72 weeks). With a median follow-up of 40.4 months, median survival was 32 months (range, 2 to 55 months). CONCLUSION: This docetaxel-based sequential schedule is safe and effective in first-line therapy for MBC, without incurring cumulative toxicity, and provides a feasible chemotherapeutic option in this clinical setting.     

Docetaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combination as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer patients: results of the phase II GINECO trial CAPYTTOLE

BackgroundThis phase II study evaluated the clinical benefit of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and docetaxel (Taxotere) as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Patients and methodsMBC patients were enrolled to receive six cycles of PLD 35 mg/m² (day 1) and docetaxel 40 mg/m² (days 1 and 15), every 28 days (group A). Because of unacceptable toxic effects, doses were modified to PLD 30 mg/m² (day 1) and docetaxel 75 mg/m² (day 2), every 3 weeks (group B). The primary end point was clinical benefit.ResultsSixty-seven patients were included (group A, 53; group B, 14). In both groups, the median number of cycles delivered was 4 and the overall dose intensity was 82% for docetaxel and 71% for PLD. In group A, main toxic effects were hematologic, palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE), and stomatitis. In group B, higher rates of grade 3–4 PPE, febrile neutropenia, and hematologic toxic effects were reported. The rate of clinical benefit was 47%. Among patients with a measurable disease, 49% achieved a partial response, 27% had a stable disease, and 13% progressed, according to RECIST criteria.ConclusionThe combination of PLD and docetaxel delivered at planned doses in this study yields unacceptable toxicity and should not be used routinely in patients with MBC.     

Multicenter phase II trial of docetaxel and carboplatin in patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of docetaxel andcarboplatin as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-celllung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods:In this multicenter, phase II trial, 33patients with previously untreated stage IIIB (n = 8) or IV(n = 25) NSCLC received intravenous infusions of docetaxel 80mg/m² followed immediately by carboplatin dosed to AUC of 6mg/ml/min (Calvert's formula) every three weeks. Patients also receiveddexamethasone 8 mg orally twice daily for three days beginning one day beforeeach docetaxel treatment. Filgrastim was not allowed during the first cycleand was added only if a patient experienced febrile neutropenia or grade 4neutropenia lasting 7 days. Results:There were 1 complete and 11 partial responses for anobjective response rate of 43% (95% CI:24%–63%) in 28 evaluable patients and 36%(95% CI: 20%–55%) in the intent-to-treatpopulation. The median duration of response was 5.5 months (range3.0–12.5 months). The median survival was 13.9 months (range 1–35+months); one-year survival was 52%. The most common toxicity washematologic, which included grade 4 neutropenia (79% of patients and7% percent of cycles) and febrile neutropenia (15% of patients);there were no episodes of grade 3 or 4 infection. The most common severenonhematologic toxicities were asthenia (24%) and myalgia (12%);there were no grade 3 or 4 neurologic effects. Conclusions:The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin has anacceptable toxicity profile and is active in the treatment of previouslyuntreated patients with advanced NSCLC. This combination is being evaluatedin a randomized phase III trial involving patients with advanced andmetastatic NSCLC.     

Phase II Trial of Weekly Docetaxel,Vinorelbine, and Trastuzumab in the First-Line Treatment of Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

BackgroundThe combinations of trastuzumab/docetaxel and trastuzumab/vinorelbine are highly active in the treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We investigated the feasibility and safety of a 3-drug combination of trastuzumab, docetaxel, and vinorelbine as first-line therapy in this patient group.Patients and MethodsSixty patients with previously untreated, measurable HER2-positive MBC (immunohistochemistry 3+ and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization positive) were treated with docetaxel 30 mg/m² intravenously (I.V.) and vinorelbine 25 mg/m² I.V. on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle. Trastuzumab was given weekly (4-mg/kg loading dose followed by 2 mg/kg/week). Patients were evaluated after 6 weeks; responders/stable patients continued treatment until progression.ResultsPatients received a median of 11 treatment cycles (range, 1–22 cycles). Forty-one of 60 patients (68%) had major responses (16 complete responses [27%], 25 partial responses [42%]). An additional 13 patients (22%) had stable disease for ≥ 6 months. After a median follow-up of 58 months, median progression-free survival was 12 months (95% CI, 9.1–16.3 months), and the median overall survival was 40.8 months (95% CI, 25-not reached). Neutropenia (72% grade 4) was the most common hematologic toxicity; 8 patients were hospitalized for febrile neutropenia. A total of 67% of patients required dose modifications for neutropenia during cycles 1 or 2. Other grade 3/4 toxicities included fatigue (12%), hyperglycemia (7%), and myalgias (7%). There were no treatment-related deaths.ConclusionThe combination of trastuzumab, docetaxel, and vinorelbine is highly active as first-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive MBC. However, this regimen offers no obvious advantages over other less myelosuppressive trastuzumab-containing regimens, and its routine use is not supported by the study.     

Phase II study of concurrent administration of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent administration of doxorubicin and docetaxel, without prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: This multi-institutional study enrolled 40 women; 37 were assessable for efficacy and all 40 patients were evaluated for toxicity. Treatment consisted of 50 mg/m(2) doxorubicin and 60 mg/m(2) docetaxel on day 1 every 3-4 weeks. RESULTS: Patients received a total of 251 cycles of chemotherapy (median, 5 cycles; range, 1-13 cycles). Of the 37 patients assessable for efficacy, 2 had a complete response and 24 had partial responses, which accounted for a 70% objective response rate (95% confidence interval, 53-84%). The median time to treatment failure was 30.1 weeks (range, 3.3-80.7 weeks). Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 88% of patients and was the most frequent haematological toxicity. Febrile neutropenia was seen in 40% of patients, but no severe infections were observed. Non-haematological toxicity was generally tolerable. There were 2 grade 4 adverse events, which included 1 bleeding duodenal ulcer and 1 hypersensitivity reaction, but grade 3 episodes were infrequent. None of the patients developed congestive heart failure or asymptomatic decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction to less than 50%. Fluid retention syndrome 相似文献   

Randomized phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab combined with docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer administered as first-line treatment: the M77001 study group.

PURPOSE: This randomized, multicenter trial compared first-line trastuzumab plus docetaxel versus docetaxel alone in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to six cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, with or without trastuzumab 4 mg/kg loading dose followed by 2 mg/kg weekly until disease progression. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients received at least one dose of the study drug. Trastuzumab plus docetaxel was significantly superior to docetaxel alone in terms of overall response rate (61% v 34%; P = .0002), overall survival (median, 31.2 v 22.7 months; P = .0325), time to disease progression (median, 11.7 v 6.1 months; P = .0001), time to treatment failure (median, 9.8 v 5.3 months; P = .0001), and duration of response (median, 11.7 v 5.7 months; P = .009). There was little difference in the number and severity of adverse events between the arms. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was seen more commonly with the combination (32%) than with docetaxel alone (22%), and there was a slightly higher incidence of febrile neutropenia in the combination arm (23% v 17%). One patient in the combination arm experienced symptomatic heart failure (1%). Another patient experienced symptomatic heart failure 5 months after discontinuation of trastuzumab because of disease progression, while being treated with an investigational anthracycline for 4 months. CONCLUSION: Trastuzumab combined with docetaxel is superior to docetaxel alone as first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive MBC in terms of overall survival, response rate, response duration, time to progression, and time to treatment failure, with little additional toxicity.     

The Breast Avastin Trial: phase II study of bevacizumab maintenance therapy after induction chemotherapy with docetaxel and capecitabine for the first-line treatment of patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer

Background

Therapeutic approach for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is still controversial. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for MBC. The feasibility of bevacizumab maintenance therapy in this setting was also evaluated.

Patients and methods

In this single-arm, multicenter phase II study, patients received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 60 mg/m² on day 1, plus capecitabine 900 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14 every 21 days. Treatment was administered for up to 6 cycles, then bevacizumab continued until progressive disease. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points were tumor response rate, overall survival, and toxicity.

Results

Seventy-nine eligible patients were treated with bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel plus capecitabine. The overall response rate was 61 %, with a complete response rate of 8 % and a median duration of response of 10 months. At a median follow-up of 28 months, the median PFS was 11 months. Fifty-two (65 %) patients received bevacizumab maintenance therapy for a median duration of 7 months (range 1 to 33+). Neutropenia was the most common grade 3–4 toxicity (28.1 % of patients), and two fatal adverse events occurred (septic shock and gastrointestinal perforation).

Conclusions

Bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel and capecitabine demonstrates significant activity and quite acceptable toxicity profile as first-line treatment of MBC. Subsequent maintenance therapy with bevacizumab is feasible for a long period of stable disease. Results deserve confirmation.     

Gemcitabine plus doxorubicin as first-line treatment in advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC), a phase II study

Introduction: Doxorubicin and Gemcitabine have promising antineoplastic activity and manageable toxicity as a single agent in the treatment of patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer. Aim of the Study: This study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine plus doxorubicin as first-line treatment of advanced or MBC patients. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced or MBC received gemcitabine 1250mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 plus doxorubicin 60mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles. Results: Thirty-five patients were included, and all are evaluable for safety and efficacy. Median age was 47 years (range, 33 to 60 years). Fourteen patients (40%) were post-and 21 (60%) were premenopausal. Prior treatment included mastectomy (23pts); adjuvant nonanthracycline containing combination chemotherapy (18pts); adjuvant hormonal therapy (3pts) and 2 pts did not receive any adjuvant therapy. Twelve patients had metastatic disease at presentation. Seventeen pts were chemonaive. Hormonal receptors were positive in 6, negative in 21, and unknown in 8 pts. Site of metastasis included one site in 15 pts, two sites in 14, and three sites in 6 pts. Complete remission was observed in 6/35 (17.1%) and partial remission in 14/35 (40%) pts, for an overall response rate of 57.1%. Stable disease was observed in 8 (22.9%) and progressive disease in 7 (20%) pts. The median time to tumor progression was 7 months (range, 5-23 months; 95% CI, 6-8 months) and the median survival time was 16 months (range, 6-43 months; 95% CI, 13-19 months). The overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 74.2% and 34.2%; respectively; with 4/35 (11.4%) patients alive at 40 months. A total of 186 cycles of treatment were administered (range2-6 cycles, median 6 cycles). The doses of both doxorubicin and gemcitabine were modified after interim analysis of toxicity following the first 22 cycles administered to the first 10 patients [Mucositis grade 3-4 occurred in 6/10 (60%), grade 3-4 neutropenia in 3/10 (30%), and febrile neutropenia grade 3 in 2/10 (20%) patients] to doxorubicin 50mg/m2 on day 1 and gemcitabine to 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 in the remaining cycles. After doses reduction, the toxicity was generally tolerable. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine plus doxorubicin after doses modification can be safely administered every 21 days with promising response as first-line therapy for MBC. The response rate, time to disease progression and overall survival rates of this regimen are comparable to other standard therapies for MBC, as well as other gemcitabine combinations.     

A Phase II Study of Docetaxel in Chemotherapy-Naïve Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Purpose: To determine the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in adult patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS).Patients/methods. Thirty eligible patients, with histologically proven STS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0–2 and bidimensionally measurable disease, entered this study. None had received previous chemotherapy. Docetaxel 100 mg m^-2 was given as a 1-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Patients were evaluable for response, evaluated by WHO criteria, after one cycle of chemotherapy and toxicity was graded by NCIC-CTG common toxicity criteria.Results. One hundred and thirty two cycles were aldministered, with a range per patient of 1–9. The median delivered dose intensity was 32.2 mg m^-2  weekm^-1 (planned 33.3 mg m^-2  weekm^-1 ) and 67% of patients received ≥90% planned dose intensity. There were three partial responses (10.7%; 95% confidence interval 2.3–28.2) with a median duration of 7 months (range 6.4–8.3 months). Thirty patients were evaluable for non-haematological toxicity and 28 for haematological toxicity (repeat counts were not available in two patients). Haematological toxicity was moderately severe, with 18 (64%) patients experiencing at least one episode of grade 4 neutropenia, and 7 (25%) patients experiencing febrile neutropenia.Conclusions. In this study, activity of docetaxel in adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced STS was modest     

A Phase II Trial of Docetaxel With Bevacizumab as First-line Therapy for HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (TORI B01)

IntroductionAddition of the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab to paclitaxel significantly improves response rates and progression-free survival for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). To assess the activity of docetaxel plus bevacizumab, a multicenter phase II trial was conducted.Patients and MethodsPatients with measurable first-line HER2/neu—negative MBC were eligible. This trial began as a 2-arm study with a docetaxel-alone arm. When bevacizumab became widely available, it was converted to a 1-arm open-label trial of docetaxel/bevacizumab. Patients enrolled in the docetaxel-alone arm were permitted to cross over to docetaxel/bevacizumab. Patients received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 75 mg/m² intravenously (I.V.) every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal.ResultsFrom March 2005 to September 2006, 76 patients were enrolled. Of the 7 patients who were randomized to docetaxel alone, 6 crossed over to docetaxel/bevacizumab (included in the safety analysis only). Two patients were found to be ineligible before receiving drug. Efficacy data are based on the 67 patients who were originally enrolled in the docetaxel/bevacizumab arm and received at least 1 dose of study medication. The confirmed objective response rate is 51% (34 of 67) with 9% complete responses (6 of 67) and 42% partial responses (28 of 67). Nine additional patients (13%) had stable disease lasting ≥ 6 months. With a median follow-up of 21.7 months, the median time to progression is 9.3 months, and median overall survival is 26.3 months. Common grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (33%), leukopenia/lymphopenia (25%), fatigue (22%), infection (17%), pain (16%), and hypertension (9%).ConclusionDocetaxel/bevacizumab was generally well tolerated with manageable toxicity and promising efficacy results.     

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with vinorelbine as salvage treatment in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study

Purpose: To investigate the activity and tolerance of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Patients and treatment: Thirty-six women with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled. The median age was 64 years, 80% of the patients had a performance status of 0–1, 30 (83%) had visceral disease and 83% had received prior taxanes while 50% anthracyclines. Treatment consisted of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m² on day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m² on days 1 and 15) every 4 weeks. Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis 2 (6%) complete and 12 (33%) partial responses were observed (overall response rate 39%; 95% CI: 23–54.8%); 8 (22%) and 14 (39%) patients experienced stable and progressive disease, respectively. The median TTP was 6.5 months and the median survival time 14.2 months. The 1-year survival rate was 54.1%. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 21 (58%) patients, grade 3–4 anemia in four (11%) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in one (3%). Two (6%) patients developed febrile neutropenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild and easily manageable. There was no clinically important cardiac toxicity or treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: The combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and vinorelbine is an active and well tolerated salvage regimen in patients with metastatic breast cancer which merits further evaluation.     

A retrospective study of second-line chemotherapy for unresectable or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus refractory to chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil plus platinum

Background In Japan, chemotherapeutic agents that have been approved for the treatment of esophageal cancer include cisplatin, nedaplatin, 5-fluorouracil, vindesine, and docetaxel. We retrospectively investigated the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of nedaplatin plus vindesine, or docetaxel alone, for patients with unresectable or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus refractory to prior chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil plus platinum. Methods Nedaplatin was administered at 90 mg/m² intravenously on day 1, and vindesine was administered at 3 mg/m² intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 28 days. Docetaxel 60 mg/m² or 70 mg/m² was administered intravenously every 21 days. We analyzed the response rate, overall survival time, progression-free survival time, and toxicity in 24 patients treated with nedaplatin plus vindesine and 28 patients treated with docetaxel. Results In patients treated with nedaplatin plus vindesine, the response rate of the 13 patients with measurable lesions was 8% (1/13), the median progression-free survival time was 1.8 months, and the median survival time was 5.5 months. In patients treated with docetaxel, the response rate of the 17 patients with measurable lesions was 18% (3/17), the median progression-free survival time was 2.1 months, and the median survival time was 5.1 months. The most frequent toxicity was neutropenia (grade 4; 13% in the group with nedaplatin plus vindesine and 50% in the docetaxel group), and febrile neutropenia (grade 3; 4% and 18%, respectively). Conclusion The efficacy of the two regimens for unresectable or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus refractory to chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil plus platinum was unsatisfactory. New, more effective therapies are needed.     

A phase I trial of docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced cancer

Background:Docetaxel and gemcitabine are active in a broad rangeof malignancies. The objective of this phase I trial was to determine themaximally tolerated doses of the combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine. Patients and methods:Patients with advanced cancer, WHOperformance status 0–2, who had received up to one prior chemotherapyregimen were treated with gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel on day 8repeated every 21 days. Prophylactic ciprofloxacin was commenced on day 11 ofeach cycle and continued until the neutrophil count reached 1.0 ×10⁹/l. G-CSF was not administered. Dose levels studied weredocetaxel/gemcitabine: 60/800, 60/1000, 75/1000, 75/1200, 85/1200 and 100/1200mg/m². Results:Thirty-nine patients were entered and all were assessablefor toxicity. The highest administered dose level was 100 mg/m²docetaxel and 1200 mg/m² gemcitabine with dose limiting toxicitiesof febrile neutropenia, grade 4 neutropenia 7 days, grade 4thrombocytopenia, grade 3 stomatitis and/or grade 3 fatigue in three out ofsix patients. Treatment was well tolerated (40 cycles) in the 10 patientstreated at the recommended dose level (85/1200) with only a single episode offebrile neutropenia and grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity was infrequent.There was no significant pulmonary toxicity. Responses were seen in a rangeof malignancies including non-small-cell lung cancer. Conclusions:The recommended dose level of 85 mg/m²docetaxel and 1200 mg/m² gemcitabine has a favourable toxicityprofile and is suitable for further investigation in phase II trials. Thisnon-platinum containing regimen warrants further investigation as a potentialalternative to platinum containing regimens in non-small-cell lung cancer andother malignancies.     

Gemcitabine plus docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a lung cancer Galician group phase II study

Background Numerous phase II and III clinical trials have demonstrated a higher activity of combined gemcitabine plus docetaxel schedules against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than that of both agents in monotherapy. Methods This phase II study evaluated a 3-week based schedule of docetaxel 85 mg/m² (1-h i.v. infusion, d8) combined with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² (30-min i.v. infusion; d1,8) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced NSCLC. Results Forty-one patients with non-resectable, stage IIIB/IV, and bidimensionally measurable disease were enrolled. A total of 182 chemotherapy cycles (median 6, range 1–6) was administered to 40 patients during the study; one patient did not receive chemotherapy due to a protocol deviation. Two patients were not evaluable for treatment efficacy. The overall response rate found was 44% (95% CI, 29–59%): three patients (7%) had a complete response and 15 patients (37%) had a partial response (median duration of response = 4.0 months). With a median follow-up of 8.7 months, the median time to disease progression was 4.4 months and the median overall survival was 7.3 months. The combined gemcitabine plus docetaxel chemotherapy was well tolerated except for pulmonary toxicity. The main grade 3–4 hematological toxicity was neutropenia (28% of patients, 9% of cycles). Two cases of febrile neutropenia were reported. The main grade 3–4 non-hematological toxicity was pulmonary toxicity (23% of patients, 6% of cycles). Conclusion Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 in combination with docetaxel 85 mg/m² on day 8 given in 3-week cycles is an active and well-tolerated first-line chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced NSCLC.     

Docetaxel in combination with mitoxantrone and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as front-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast?cancer: A?multicenter phase II study

Purpose:To evaluate the activity and tolerance of docetaxelin combination with mitoxantrone and granulocyte colony-stimulatingfactor (G-CSF) as front-line treatment in patients with metastaticbreast cancer (MBC). Patients and methods:Fifty-four previously untreatedpatients with MBC who had bidimensionally measurable disease wereenrolled onto the study. Forty-eight (89%) patients had visceralmetastases and nineteen (36%) had relapsed within twelve monthsfollowing adjuvant chemotherapy. Docetaxel (100 mg/m²) wasgiven on day 1 after appropriate premedication and mitoxantrone (20mg/m²) on day 8. G-CSF (150 mcg/m²/d s.c.) wasadministered from day 2 to day 6 and from day 9 to day 15. The regimenwas repeated every three weeks, on an outpatient basis. Results:In an intention-to-treat analysis, 9 (17%)CRs, 24 (44%) PRs, (overall response rate 61%; 95%confidence interval (CI): 48.1%–74.1%), 12(22%) SD and 9 (17%) PD were observed. The median durationof response and the median time to tumor progression was 12.5 and 14months, respectively. The overall median survival was 16.5 months,whilst the probability for one- and three-year survival was 61%and 35%, respectively. Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 37(69%) patients, and febrile neutropenia in 16 (30%); therewas one death due to sepsis. Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia occurredin four (8%) patients. Grade 2–3 neurosensory toxicity wasobserved in 8 (15%) patients and grade 2–3 asthenia in 24(45%). Conclusions:Docetaxel in combination with mitoxantrone andG-CSF support is an intensified and active front-line regimen forpatients with MBC; despite its hematological toxicity, this regimenmerits further comparison with other standard anthracycline- and/ortaxane-based combinations.