Long-term haemodynamic effects of isosorbide 5-mononitrate in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Since it is well known that pharmacological tolerance may rapidly occur on continuous administration of organic nitrates, in this study we attempted to investigate whether isosorbide 5-mononitrate (Is-5-Mn), a long-acting vasodilator that decreases portal pressure in acute haemodynamic studies, causes a significant reduction in portal pressure following long-term oral administration. Eleven patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension were studied prior to and following 3 months of continuous administration of Is-5-Mn, 40 mg b.i.d. The hepatic venous pressure gradient decreased significantly following long-term Is-5-Mn treatment (from 18.6 +/- 3.4 to 17.2 +/- 3.1 mmHg; p less than 0.01). This was associated with a moderate increase in hepatic blood flow. Azygos blood flow and portal blood flow did not change. There were significant decreases in mean arterial pressure (from 89.4 +/- 13.7 to 82.6 +/- 10.8 mmHg; p less than 0.05) and heart rate (from 77 +/- 10 to 73 +/- 10 b.p.m.; p less than 0.05). In contrast, there were no changes in portal pressure or hepatic and systemic haemodynamics in a control group of 17 patients receiving placebo. Repeated nitroglycerin cross-tolerance studies in five patients receiving Is-5-Mn indicated the development of a partial pharmacological tolerance (as shown by blunted haemodynamic response to nitroglycerin after long-term Is-5-Mn administration). This study shows that Is-5-Mn continues to cause a significant decrease in portal pressure during long-term therapy, with only partial pharmacological tolerance to this compound.     

Enhancement of portal pressure reduction by the association of isosorbide-5-mononitrate to propranolol administration in patients with cirrhosis

This study investigated whether oral doses of isosorbide-5-mononitrate, a preferential venous dilator that decreases portal pressure, could enhance the effects of propranolol on portal hypertension. Taking part in the study were 28 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Twenty patients (group 1) had hemodynamic measurements in baseline conditions after beta-blockade by intravenous administration of propranolol and after receiving oral doses of isosorbide-5-mononitrate. The remaining eight patients (group 2) were given oral isosorbide-5-mononitrate while receiving chronic propranolol therapy. In group 1, propranolol significantly reduced portal pressure (estimated as the gradient between wedged and free hepatic venous pressures) from 21.5 +/- 3.9 to 18.6 +/- 4.2 mm Hg (-13.7%, p less than 0.001), azygos blood flow (-38%, p less than 0.001), hepatic blood flow (-12.8%, p less than 0.05), cardiac output (-24.5%, p less than 0.001) and heart rate (-18.4%, p less than 0.001) without significant changes in mean arterial pressure. Addition of oral isosorbide-5-mononitrate caused a further and marked fall in portal pressure (to 15.7 +/- 3.1 mm Hg, p less than 0.001), without additional changes in azygos blood flow but with significant additional reductions in hepatic blood flow (-15.5%, p less than 0.05), cardiac output (-11.5%, p less than 0.001) and mean arterial pressure (-22%, p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Reduction of portal pressure by isosorbide-5-mononitrate in patients with cirrhosis. Effects on splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics and liver function

The results of a study to characterize the effects of the oral administration of isosorbide-5-mononitrate (Is-5-Mn), the active metabolite of isosorbide dinitrate, on portal hypertension in 23 patients with cirrhosis are reported. Patients received 20 mg of Is-5-Mn (n = 10), 40 mg (n = 9), or a placebo (n = 4). No significant changes were observed after the administration of the placebo. However, both doses of Is-5-Mn significantly reduced portal pressure, as evaluated by measurements of the hepatic venous pressure gradient. The fall in portal pressure averaged 10% after the 20-mg dose and 18% after 40 mg and was maintained for the 2 h of observation. Reduction of portal pressure was due to a decrease in the wedged hepatic vein pressure, with no changes in the free hepatic venous pressure. After the 20-mg dose, the decrease in portal pressure was associated with an increase in hepatic blood flow (16%), suggesting a fall in hepatic vascular resistance. However, after the 40-mg dose, a reflex splanchnic vasoconstriction elicited by the fall in arterial pressure (-19%) appeared to contribute to the greater reduction in portal pressure, as suggested by a significant decrease in azygos blood flow (-15%). These beneficial effects on portal pressure were not associated with adverse effects on liver function, as evaluated by measurements of the hepatic clearance of indocyanine green and the hepatic intrinsic clearance. Neither dose of Is-5-Mn caused significant changes in these quantitative parameters of liver function. These findings suggest that Is-5-Mn could be a potentially useful and safe agent in the treatment of portal hypertension.     

Low doses of isosorbide mononitrate attenuate the postprandial increase in portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis

Postprandial hyperemia is associated with a significant increase in portal pressure in cirrhosis, which may contribute to progressive dilation and rupture of gastroesophageal varices. In cirrhosis, an insufficient hepatic production of nitric oxide (NO) may impair the expected hepatic vasodilatory response to increased blood flow, further exaggerating the postprandial increase in portal pressure. This study was aimed at investigating whether low doses of an oral NO donor might counteract the postprandial peak in portal pressure. Twenty-three portal hypertensive cirrhotics, 8 of them under propranolol therapy, were randomized to receive orally 5-isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN; 10 mg; n = 11) or placebo (n = 12) and a standard liquid meal 15 minutes later. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and hepatic blood flow (HBF) were measured at baseline and 15, 30, and 45 minutes after a meal. ISMN significantly attenuated the postprandial increase in portal pressure as compared with placebo (peak HVPG increase: 2.4 +/- 1.4 mm Hg vs. 5.2 +/- 2.1 mm Hg, P =.002). Percentual increases in HBF were similar in both groups. MAP decreased slightly in ISMN group (-7.5% +/-.5%; P <.01 vs. baseline). These effects were also observed in patients on chronic propranolol therapy. In conclusion, hepatic NO supplementation by low doses of ISMN effectively reduces the postprandial increase of portal pressure in cirrhosis, with only a mild effect on arterial pressure. The same was observed in patients receiving propranolol. Our results suggest that therapeutic strategies based on selective hepatic NO delivery may improve the treatment of portal hypertension.     

Propranolol and haemodynamic response in cirrhosis.

In the present study, we compared cirrhotic patients who had a decrease in the hepatic venous pressure gradient after propranolol intake to patients without a decrease. Twenty patients with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices were investigated during hepatic vein catheterization before and 90 min after an oral dose of 80 mg propranolol. The hepatic venous pressure gradient decreased by 12.6% (19.0 +/- 4.7 to 16.3 +/- 3.6 mm Hg, p less than 0.05). Eight (40%) out of 20 patients had a decrease of less than 10% in protal pressure (non-responders). Responders had a higher baseline cardiac index than non-responders (3.79 +/- 0.74 vs. 2.83 +/- 0.53 1.min-1.m-2; p less than 0.01). No difference in the effect of propranolol on portal pressure was observed between patients with or without ascites, or between Child-Turcotte A, B, and C class patients. Our results suggest that cirrhotic patients who respond to oral propranolol with a decrease in portal pressure are more hyperdynamic than those without a significant fall in portal pressure.     

Portal pressure response to losartan compared with propranolol in patients with cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES: Losartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, has portal hypotensive effects. This study evaluates the effect of losartan on portal pressure after 14 days and compares it with that of propranolol. METHODS: A total of 39 individuals with cirrhosis were randomized into two groups of 19 and 20 patients each and were treated with losartan and propranolol, respectively. Hepatic venous pressure gradient was measured at baseline and on day 14 of therapy. Responders to therapy had hepatic venous pressure gradient reduction of >/=20% of baseline value. RESULTS: With losartan, 15 of 19 (78.94%) patients were responders and with propranolol, nine of 20 (45%) patients were responders (p < 0.05). Although the hepatic venous pressure gradient reduction (i.e., percentage from baseline) with losartan (26.74 +/- 21.7%) was higher than with propranolol (14.52 +/- 32%), the difference was not significant. The reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient with losartan was contributed mainly by a significant drop of wedge hepatic venous pressure from 32.42 +/- 6.61 mm of Hg to 28.31 +/- 5.09 mm of Hg (p < 0.05) compared to that with propranolol, which was from 34.55 +/- 5.41 mm of Hg to 32.75 +/- 8.13 mm of Hg (p > 0.05). Responders among alcohol-abusing patients were significantly higher with losartan (81.8%) compared to those on propranolol (27.2%; p < 0.05). In the losartan group, all seven nonascitic cirrhotic individuals, as compared with two of five in the propranolol group, responded to the drugs. During the study, no significant side effects were observed in either group (who were not receiving diuretics) or in follow-up with diuretics. CONCLUSIONS: Losartan is as effective as propranolol in reducing portal pressure in cirrhotic patients who are not receiving diuretics. Losartan is also superior to propranolol for achieving target level hepatic venous gradient for prevention of variceal bleeding in nonascitic and alcohol-abusing cirrhotic patients.     

Short-term effects of propranolol on portal venous pressure

The present study was designed to investigate the effect of propranolol on portal pressure of patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and portal hypertension and to correlate these effects with clinical and laboratory parameters. The mean baseline hepatic venous pressure gradient in the 50 patients studied was of 18.2 +/- 4.1 mm Hg. It decreased significantly 2 hr after the oral administration of 40 mg of propranolol to 15.7 +/- 4.2 mm Hg (a mean reduction of 13.4 +/- 17%). This reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient resulted mainly from a decrease in mean wedged hepatic venous pressure. There was no correlation between the decrease in hepatic venous pressure gradient and the decrease in heart rate. When results were analyzed individually, only 15 (30%) showed a large decrease in hepatic venous pressure gradient (greater than 20%), 15 (30%) showed a moderate decrease (10 to 19%), and in 20 patients (40%) there was no reduction or an increase in hepatic venous pressure gradient. Comparison of "responders" (those that reduced hepatic venous pressure gradient greater than 10%) and "nonresponders" (hepatic venous pressure gradient reduction less than 10%) showed no significant differences in baseline laboratory and hemodynamic parameters, in the severity of the liver disease, in the heart rate and blood pressure response to propranolol, nor in the propranolol plasma levels achieved 2 hr after propranolol administration. Propranolol plasma levels correlated with the reduction in heart rate but not with the reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient. Of 14 nonresponders to 40 mg of propranolol who received additional doses, six showed a reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Acute administration of carvedilol is more effective than propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate in the reduction of portal pressure in patients with viral cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE: Propranolol is known to decrease portal pressure in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension; however, a substantial number of patients do not respond to propranolol administration. The addition of isosorbide-5-mononitrate may enhance portal pressure reduction in patients receiving propranolol. Carvedilol is a nonselective beta-blocker with alpha(1)-adrenergic blocking activity. It has been shown to decrease portal pressure in cirrhotic patients. Additionally, carvedilol has a greater portal hypotensive effect than propranolol alone in patients with cirrhosis. The current study is aimed at comparing the acute hemodynamic effects of carvedilol with the effects of propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate in patients with viral cirrhosis. METHODS: Patients with viral cirrhosis were randomly assigned to receive an oral administration of carvedilol of 25 mg (n = 11) or an oral administration of propranolol 40 mg plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate 20 mg (n = 11). Hemodynamic values were measured at basal and 90 min after drugs administration. RESULTS: Both carvedilol and propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate significantly decreased cardiac index, heart rate, and HVPG. The magnitude of changes in HVPG observed between the basal and after drugs administration was greater in patients receiving carvedilol than in those receiving propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (-18.6 +/- 3.6%vs-10.1 +/- 3.6%, p < 0.05). Hepatic blood flow increased following carvedilol administration but remained unchanged in patients receiving propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate. The magnitude of decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) did not differ between the two groups of patients. CONCLUSION: In our patients with viral cirrhosis, carvedilol is more effective than propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate in the reduction of HVPG. Carvedilol administration causes an increase in hepatic blood flow, but its systemic effects were similar to those of propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate.     

Hemodynamic effect of spironolactone in liver cirrhosis and propranolol-resistant portal hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: In a proportion of patients with liver cirrhosis, portal pressure does not decrease adequately with propranolol. These patients may benefit from another drug that may reduce portal pressure. We evaluated the role of spironolactone, alone or with propranolol, in such patients. METHODS: Patients with cirrhosis, with or without ascites, with esophageal varices and with hepatic venous pressure gradient exceeding 12 mmHg, which did not show a 20% reduction after an 80-mg oral dose of propranolol, were studied. They were allocated to receive spironolactone 100 mg orally once daily either alone (group 1, n=10) or with propranolol 40 mg orally twice daily (group 2, n=10), for 7 days, after which the hemodynamic study was repeated. RESULTS: Hepatic venous pressure gradient decreased in those receiving spironolactone and propranolol (p=0.007); 5 patients in group 1 and 7 in group 2 showed a reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient by more than 20%. However, the reduction produced by spironolactone alone (20.5 [31.3]%) was not significantly different from that produced by combination therapy (30.3 [25.9]%; p=0.46). CONCLUSION: Spironolactone in combination with propranolol achieves adequate reduction (> or = 20%) in hepatic venous pressure gradient in propranolol-resistant portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis. Spironolactone alone was also effective in some patients.     

Effect and mechanism of action of isosorbide-5-mononitrate.

Nitrates have been shown to decrease portal pressure in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension and this has been attributed to decreased portal venous resistance. We studied the effect and mechanism of action of oral administration of isosorbide-5-mononitrate (Is-5-Mn) (20 mg), which, unlike the dinitrate, does not require hepatic biotransformation to a vasoactive metabolite on portal and systemic haemodynamics in 11 patients with portal hypertension complicating cirrhosis. A significant reduction in portal pressure gradient (WHVP-FHVP) (from 23.9 (3.4) to 21.8 (3.4) mmHg: p less than 0.005) occurred 60 minutes after Is-5-Mn due entirely to a fall in WHVP, associated with decreased estimated liver blood flow (from 1940 (159) to 1639 (179) ml/min: p less than 0.05). Right atrial and pulmonary artery pressures and cardiac index fell significantly whilst mean arterial pressure remained unaffected. Heart rate and the calculated systemic vascular resistance index increased significantly. Significant correlations existed between the reduction in portal pressure gradient and fall in cardiac index (r = 0.65, p less than 0.05) and increase in systemic vascular resistance index (r = 0.72, p less than 0.02). The observed decrease in estimated liver blood flow, in association with an increase in systemic vascular resistance index, suggests that baroreceptor mediated splanchnic vasoconstriction may be one of the factors responsible for the fall in portal pressure, rather than portal venous dilatation.     

Presinusoidal portal hypertension in non-alcoholic cirrhosis

The simultaneous measurement of wedged hepatic vein pressure (WHVP) and portal vein pressure (PVP) was performed in 156 cirrhotic patients. In the 110 alcoholic cirrhotic patients (97 micronodular and 13 macronodular cirrhosis), WHVP and PVP were closely related (25.8 +/- 6.3 vs. 25.9 +/- 6.3 mm Hg; p = not statistically significant). The difference between the two parameters was greater than 4 mm Hg in only six patients. In the 46 patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis (41 macronodular and 1 micronodular cirrhosis; 4 primary biliary cirrhosis), PVP was significantly higher than was WHVP (25.8 +/- 6.2 vs. 21.7 +/- 6.8 mm Hg; p less than 0.001); in 20 patients, PVP exceeded WHVP by more than 4 mm Hg, and the mean difference was 7.5 mm Hg. There was no correlation between the porto-hepatic gradient and total hepatic blood flow measured by the indocyanine green single injection method or the portal fraction of total hepatic blood flow measured by indicator dilution curves. It is concluded that: (i) measurement of WHVP in alcoholic cirrhosis provides a reliable estimate of the severity of the portal hypertension, and (ii) hemodynamic evaluation of nonalcoholic cirrhosis should include PVP measurement in order to avoid underestimation of the porto-hepatic gradient.     

The portal pressure response to beta-blockade is greater in cirrhotic patients without varices than in those with varices

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nonselective beta-blockers are effective in reducing portal pressure in cirrhotic patients. However, this beneficial effect is highly variable and may depend on the extent of portal system collateralization. The aim of this study was to compare portal pressure response with timolol, a nonselective beta-blocker, in cirrhotic patients with and without varices. METHODS: Portal and systemic hemodynamics were measured before and after a single oral dose of 10 mg of timolol in 50 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, 15 with and 35 without esophageal varices. RESULTS: Timolol significantly decreased portal pressure in all patients (mean reduction, 20% +/- 13%; P < 0.0001). The reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient was greater in patients without varices (-24% +/- 14%) than in those with varices (-12% +/- 8%) (P < 0.01). A decrease in the hepatic venous pressure gradient of <12 mm Hg was achieved in 7 of 12 (58%) patients without varices and a baseline pressure gradient of <12 mm Hg, but only in 3 of 15 patients with varices (20%) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Timolol is effective in reducing portal pressure in cirrhotic patients, more so in patients without varices, suggesting that nonselective beta-blockers will be more effective in the treatment of portal hypertension when administered at early stages, before the development of varices. (Gastroenterology 1997 Jun;112(6):2012-6)     

Hemodynamic events in a prospective randomized trial of propranolol versus placebo in the prevention of a first variceal hemorrhage

In a double-blind randomized trial, the hemodynamic events following the administration of propranolol (n = 51) or a placebo (n = 51) were prospectively studied in cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices. The hepatic venous pressure gradient, heart rate, and variceal size were determined at the baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after the beginning of therapy. Baseline values were similar in both groups. At 3 months, the hepatic venous pressure gradient decreased significantly in propranolol-treated patients (from 18.1 +/- 4.2 to 15.7 +/- 3.4 mm Hg; P less than 0.05) but not in patients receiving the placebo (19.6 +/- 6.8 to 17.5 +/- 5.3 mm Hg; NS). At subsequent time intervals this gradient decreased significantly from the baseline value in both groups. Heart rate decreased significantly in the propranolol-treated group at all times (P less than 0.001). Variceal hemorrhage occurred in 13 patients (11 placebo-, 2 propranolol-treated; P less than 0.01), all of whom had a hepatic venous pressure gradient greater than 12 mm Hg. In 21 patients (14 propranolol-, 7 placebo-treated) the hepatic venous pressure gradient decreased to less than or equal to 12 mm Hg; none of them bled from esophageal varices, and their mortality rate also decreased. Because most of the bleeding events occurred during the first year (10 placebo-, 1 propranolol-treated; P less than 0.01), propranolol seems to have its protective effect during the period associated with the largest reduction in the hepatic venous pressure gradient. Because a reduction in the hepatic venous pressure gradient to less than 12 mm Hg protects from variceal bleeding and increases the rate of survival, this should be the aim of the pharmacological therapy of portal hypertension.     

Carvedilol, a new nonselective beta-blocker with intrinsic anti- Alpha1-adrenergic activity, has a greater portal hypotensive effect than propranolol in patients with cirrhosis.

Only some patients show a substantial hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) reduction after propranolol, which makes it desirable to investigate drugs with greater portal hypotensive effect. The aim of this study was to investigate whether carvedilol, a nonselective beta-blocker with anti-alpha1-adrenergic activity, may cause a greater HVPG reduction than propranolol. Thirty-five cirrhotic patients had hemodynamic measurements before and after the random administration of carvedilol (n = 14), propranolol (n = 14), or placebo (n = 7). Carvedilol markedly reduced HVPG, from 19.5 +/- 1.3 to 15.4 +/- 1 mm Hg (P <.0001). This HVPG reduction was greater than after propranolol (-20.4 +/- 2 vs. -12.7 +/- 2%, P <.05). Moreover, carvedilol decreased HVPG greater than 20% of baseline values or to 相似文献   

Acute and chronic hemodynamic effects of propranolol in unselected cirrhotic patients

Different and contradictory results concerning the use of propranolol in the treatment of portal hypertension have been reported. This study was designed to investigate the hemodynamic effects of short- and long-term administration of propranolol in portal hypertensive patients. Portal pressure, cardiac index, heart rate and blood pressure were obtained in 18 unselected alcoholic cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices before and 60 min after the oral administration of 40 mg propranolol and again after 106 +/- 35 days of continuous oral administration (mean dose = 158 +/- 63 mg per day). Baseline portal pressure was 21.7 +/- 7.2 mm Hg. It decreased after 60 min to 17.2 +/- 5.5 mm Hg (p less than 0.01) and after long-term administration of propranolol to 16.1 +/- 5.7 mm Hg (p less than 0.01). No decrease in portal pressure was noted in 9 of 18 (50%) patients after acute administration and 5 of 17 (30%) patients after long-term administration. Baseline cardiac index was 5.1 +/- 1.2 liters X min-1 X m-2. It decreased after 60 min to 3.9 +/- 1.4 liters X min-1 X m-2 (p less than 0.01) and to 3.6 +/- 1.0 liters X min-1 X m-2 after long-term administration (p less than 0.001). Baseline heart rate was 85 +/- 11 beats per min. It decreased after 60 min to 75 +/- 9 (p less than 0.001) and after long-term administration to 62 +/- 6 (p less than 0.001) beats per min. Baseline mean arterial pressure was 108 +/- 11 Hg. It decreased after 60 min to 97 +/- 14 mm Hg (p less than 0.01) and after long-term administration to 103 +/- 14 mm Hg (not statistically significant).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Portal and systemic haemodynamic response to acute and chronic administration of low and high dose isosorbide-5-mononitrate in patients with cirrhosis.

Oral isosorbide-5-mononitrate (Is-5-Mn) was given in doses of 10 and 40 mg acutely and chronically (twice daily for four weeks), allowing a nitrate free interval to 25 patients with cirrhosis. Both 10 mg and 40 mg Is-5-Mn reduced the hepatic venous pressure gradient acutely and chronically, without evidence of tolerance. This was achieved by a reduction in the wedged hepatic venous pressure. The effect on mean azygos blood flow was variable with no significant mean change seen acutely or after chronic use with either dose. The variability was dependent not on the dose used but on the initial azygos flow; the flow in patients with initially low values increased and those with high azygos flows decreased after nitrate challenge. The development of the porto-collateral flow seems an important parameter in predicting haemodynamic response to Is-5-Mn.     

Acute propranolol administration effectively decreases portal pressure in patients with TIPS dysfunction. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Up to 60% of patients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) require angioplasty or restenting during the first year of follow up because of TIPS dysfunction (stenosis of the intrahepatic shunt increasing the portal pressure gradient above the 12 mm Hg threshold). We hypothesised that in patients with TIPS stenosis, propranolol administration, by decreasing portal inflow, would markedly decrease portal pressure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with TIPS dysfunction were investigated by measuring portal pressure gradient before and after acute propranolol administration (0.2 mg/kg intravenously; n=18). RESULTS: Propranolol markedly reduced the portal pressure gradient (from 16.6 (3.5) to 11.9 (4.8) mm Hg; p<0.0001), cardiac index (-26 (7)%), and heart rate (-18 (7)%) (p<0.0001). Portal pressure gradient decreased to less than 12 mm Hg in nine patients, more frequently in those with moderate dysfunction (portal pressure gradient 16 mm Hg) than in patients with severe dysfunction (portal pressure gradient >16 mm Hg) (8/10 v 1/8; p=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Propranolol therapy may delay the increase in portal pressure and reduce the need for reintervention in patients with TIPS dysfunction.     

Isosorbide-5-mononitrate in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension associated with portal hypertension.

Pulmonary hypertension is uncommonly associated with portal hypertension. The current approach for the management of pulmonary hypertension involves the use of vasodilators in patients who show vascular responsiveness during an acute challenge. Since the association of portal hypertension with pulmonary hypertension is very seldomly presented, its optimal therapy has not been defined. Moreover, calcium-channel blockers, which are usually used in pulmonary hypertension treatment, may exert a deleterious effect on portal hypertension. Therefore, the search for drugs that may be active under both conditions has important clinical implications. This report presents the case of a patient with portal hypertension-associated pulmonary artery hypertension that was effectively treated with isosorbide-5-mononitrate (Is-5-Mn). The patient had severe portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient=14.5 mmHg) and pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP)=50 mmHg). Acute administration of prostacyclin and nitric oxide elicited a significant reduction in both PAP and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), an effect that was also achieved with Is-5-Mn. The patient was treated with 40 mg Is-5-Mn twice daily and a haemodynamic study performed 6 months later showed that the reduction in both PAP and PVR persisted.     

Portal hemodynamics during nitroglycerin administration in cirrhotic patients

Nitroglycerin is a potent venous dilator and a mild arterial vasodilator that has been shown to improve the hemodynamic response to vasopressin in portal hypertensive patients and to decrease portal pressure in experimental animals. In order to determine the effect of nitroglycerin on portal venous hemodynamics, we studied 11 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis before and during the administration of sublingual nitroglycerin (0.4 and 0.6 mg). The hepatic venous pressure gradient (which was obtained by subtracting the free hepatic venous pressure from the wedged hepatic venous pressure) decreased from 17.9 +/- 6.5 mm Hg (mean +/- S.D.) to 15.1 +/- 5.1 mm Hg (p less than 0.02) at the peak of the effect, which occurred from 2 to 12 min after nitroglycerin administration. The mean arterial pressure was reduced from 96 +/- 10 mm Hg to a peak decrease of 76 +/- 18 mmHg (p less than 0.001). The peak change in the hepatic venous pressure gradient induced by nitroglycerin correlated directly with the peak change in mean arterial pressure (r = 0.79, p less than 0.01). There was a moderate increase in heart rate in response to the decrease in blood pressure (73 +/- 15 to 83 +/- 15 beats per min, p less than 0.001). Two of the 11 patients did not reduce their hepatic venous pressure gradient after 0.6 mg nitroglycerin. Reductions in portal pressure were observed with both increases and moderate decreases in azygos blood flow, suggesting that, as observed in experimental animals, the portal-pressure-reducing effect of nitroglycerin could be due to two different and independent mechanisms, a reduction in portal blood flow or portal-collateral vasodilatation.     

Hemodynamic effects of a combination of vasopressin and ketanserin in patients with hepatitis b-related cirrhosis.

We measured the hemodynamic effects of intravenous vasopressin, ketanserin (a 5-hydroxytryptamine-2 receptor blocker), and vasopressin plus ketanserin in 33 patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis. Thirteen patients received vasopressin alone (0.66 units/min), ten patients ketanserin alone (10 mg), and ten patients vasopressin followed by vasopressin plus ketanserin. Vasopressin alone reduced the hepatic venous pressure gradient (from 18 +/- 5, mean +/- S.D., to 9 +/- 3 mmHg, p less than 0.0001) and cardiac output (p less than 0.0001), but increased mean arterial pressure (p less than 0.005), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p less than 0.0001), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (p less than 0.0001), and systemic vascular resistance (p less than 0.001). There was no significant change in heart rate. Ketanserin alone produced a significant fall in the hepatic venous pressure gradient (from 16 +/- 4 to 13 +/- 3 mmHg, p less than 0.0001), mean arterial pressure (p less than 0.005), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p less than 0.005), and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (p less than 0.005). Heart rate, cardiac output, and systemic vascular resistance were not significantly changed. The addition of ketanserin to vasopressin corrected most of the systemic hemodynamic disturbances produced by vasopressin. This combination did not lead to a further reduction in the hepatic venous pressure gradient. We conclude that intravenous ketanserin reduces portal pressure in patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis. The addition of ketanserin to vasopressin improves the detrimental systemic hemodynamic effects of vasopressin without further reducing the portal pressure.