社会资本举办的非营利性医院经济监管指标体系研究

利用文献回顾、专家咨询和层次分析等方法,构建了对社会资本举办的非营利性医院进行经济监管评价的指标体系,包括3个一级指标、9个二级指标和18个三级指标,重点从财务状况、经济运营、收益处置三个方面评价其非营利性质,并对指标体系的应用条件进行了探讨。     

加强对社会资本举办的非营利医疗机构经济监管的建议

结合非营利组织监管理论和社会资本举办非营利性医疗机构的现状,从监管组织体系、信息平台、公正透明的监管模式、多方参与的全程监管体系、内部治理结构和法规制度建设等几个方面,提出了加强经济监管的对策建议。     

社会资本举办非营利性医疗机构的政策建议

遵循国家鼓励和支持社会资本办医的政策导向,为更好地发展社会资本举办非营利性医疗机构提出6条政策建议：调整营利性与非营利性的分类方式,试点大型公立医院的转制,财政补助转＂暗贴＂为＂明贴＂,调整医疗服务价格,形成立体双向的监管体系,细化和落实法律法规。     

社会资本举办非营利性医疗机构制约因素研究

社会资本举办非营利性医疗机构,特别是综合性医院,在我国的设立和发展仍因受到诸多因素的制约而步履维艰.通过对法律政策、卫生监管、服务价格和医疗保险因素的实例分析和理论探讨,为进一步研究社会资本举办非营利性医疗机构的政策建议提供依据.     

浅谈加强社会资本举办非营利性医院的经济监管

《中共中央国务院关于深化医药卫生体制改革的意见》明确指出,鼓励社会资本举办非营利性医疗机构,形成投资主体多元化、投资方式多样化的办医体制,满足人民群众多层次、多元化的医疗服务需求。随着医疗卫生体制改革的不断深入,社会资本举办的非营利性医疗机构逐渐增多,在发挥积极作用的同时,     

政府对非营利医疗机构的经济如何监管

医疗机构实行分类管理,政府要对非营利性医疗机构的以下10个方面进行监管;国有资产监管;职工工资收入监管;收益分配监管;设备购置监管;基本建设监管;收据监管;物价监管;财务会计工作监管;对外投资监管;运营绩效监管。     

社会资本举办的非营利性医疗机构营利行为分析与对策研究

根据非营利性医疗机构的性质,文章归纳总结了社会资本举办的非营利性医疗机构可能存在的营利行为,并对其原因进行了分析,最后提出了防范社会办非营利性医疗机构营利行为的对策,以确保其非营利性和公益性。     

社会资本与民营非营利性医疗机构的发展空间

社会资本指的是社会组织的特征,如信任、规范和网络,它是无形的,可以通过促进合作行动提高社会效率。随着我国医疗改革的深入,由民间资本创立,旨在提供社会公共卫生服务的非营利性医疗机构将作为国有非营利性与民营营利性医疗机构的有效补充在医疗市场发挥作用。树立民营非营利性医疗机构的良好社会公众形象并获得群众大力支持和帮助,赢得慈善机构捐资、争取企业或个人赞助等均是非营利性医疗机构创造并利用社会资本,赢得生存和发展空间的关键。     

社会资本办医疗机构监管工作中的不确定性研究

不确定性广泛存在于卫生监督工作,本文通过对辖区社会办医疗机构监管信息分析,阐述树立卫生监督变革意识,加快信息化工作制度建设和构建新型卫生监督团队是卫生监督机构应对不确定性的重要发展方向。     

鼓励社会资本举办医疗机构政策探析

针对国家关于鼓励社会资本举办医疗机构的政策实施,文章分析了当前在投资、准入、人才、医保等方面制约社会办医的因素,提出了“专、精、优”的准入原则;同时,建议在明确政府和市场的责任边界后,充分放开社会资本办医的区域和领域;并优化民营医疗机构用人环境,解除医保定点障碍,     

社会资本举办的非营利性医院和营利性医院运营机制比较研究

目前,国内缺乏对社会资本举办的非营利性医院生存状况全面、系统的研究。本文通过社会资本举办的非营利性医院和营利性医院的对比研究,分析现阶段社会资本举办的非营利性医院运行过程中存在的问题及改革的方向,为下一阶段医疗卫生机构改革提供政策依据。     

Toward an institutional perspective on social capital health interventions: lay community health workers as social capital builders

This article argues that social capital health research should move beyond a mere focus on social cohesion and network perspectives to integrate an institutional approach into the development of social capital health interventions. An institutional perspective, which is unique in its emphasis on linking social capital in addition to the bonding and bridging forms, contextualises social capital, allowing researchers to confront the complexity of social relationships. This perspective allows for the construction of interventions that draw on the resources of diverse actors, particularly the state. One intervention strategy with the potential to create community linkages involves lay community health workers (LCHWs), individuals who are trained to perform a variety of health-related functions but lack a formal professional health education. This article begins with a review of the institutional social capital-building literature. It then goes on to briefly review the social capital and health literature and discuss the state of intervention research. Thereafter, it describes LCHWs and discusses studies that have utilised LCHWs to tackle community health problems. In doing so, this article presents an institutional-based systematic framework for how LCHWs can build social capital, including a discussion of the ways in which LCHWs can successfully promote bonding, bridging and linking social capital.     

Access to health care and community social capital

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that variation in reported access to health care is positively related to the level of social capital present in a community. DATA SOURCES: The 1996 Household Survey of the Community Tracking Study, drawn from 22 metropolitan statistical areas across the United States (n = 19,672). Additional data for the 22 communities are from a 1996 multicity broadcast media marketing database, including key social capital indicators, the 1997 National Profile of Local Health Departments survey, and Interstudy, American Hospital Association, and American Medical Association sources. STUDY DESIGN: The design is cross-sectional. Self-reported access to care problems is the dependent variable. Independent variables include individual sociodemographic variables, community-level health sector variables, and social capital variables. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data are merged from the various sources and weighted to be population representative and are analyzed using hierarchical categorical modeling. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Persons who live in metropolitan statistical areas featuring higher levels of social capital report fewer problems accessing health care. A higher HMO penetration rate in a metropolitan statistical area was also associated with fewer access problems. Other health sector variables were not related to health care access. CONCLUSIONS: The results observed for 22 major U.S. cities are consistent with the hypothesis that community social capital enables better access to care, perhaps through improving community accountability mechanisms.     

医院社会工作者的战略地位和卫生经济学贡献

医院社会工作者是跨学科、跨专业、跨领域医疗团队的重要成员,在卫生保健体系和医院质量管理中处于战略地位。更为重要的是,医院社会工作者通过健康教育宣传、社会资源动员、预防和缓解医疗纠纷等专业服务,可为医院做出难以估量的卫生经济学贡献。     

The different effects of vertical social capital and horizontal social capital on dental status: A multilevel analysis

Few studies distinguish between the effects of different forms of social capital on health and of those that do none use physical indicators of health as an outcome variable. The objective of this study was to determine whether vertical and horizontal social capital had different associations with dental status of elderly Japanese.