A prospective randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with bolus versus continuous infusion of doxorubicin in patients with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma and an analysis of prognostic factors

A prospective randomized trial was conducted to compare the cardiotoxic and therapeutic effects of doxorubicin (60 mg/m2 every 3 to 4 weeks) administered by bolus or 72-hour continuous infusion as adjuvant chemotherapy in 82 eligible patients after resection of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity or superficial trunk. Cardiac toxicity, defined as a 10% or greater decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction as assessed by radionuclide cineangiography, was evaluated in 69 patients. Cardiotoxicity was seen in 61% of patients in the bolus treatment arm with the median doxorubicin dose of 420 mg/m2. Among patients who received continuous infusion, 42% had cardiotoxicity with a median dose of 540 mg/m2. The rate of cardiotoxicity as a function of the cumulative dose of doxorubicin was significantly higher in the bolus treatment arm (P = 0.0017). Two patients in each group had clinical congestive heart failure, with one cardiac death occurring in each. There was a trend toward a lower rate of metastasis (P = 0.19) and a significantly lower rate of death of disease (P = 0.036) for patients treated with the bolus dose. Cox model analysis identified three unfavorable characteristics for the rate of developing a distant metastasis: blood transfusion within 24 hours of operation (P less than 0.00001), tumor deep to the fascia and 5 cm or more in size (P = 0.0043), and a histologic subtype other than liposarcoma (P = 0.0002). The unfavorable effect of continuous infusion was not selected in the model (P = 0.16). Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with soft tissue sarcoma is investigational. Furthermore, the impact of perioperative blood transfusion merits further study.     

Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of two schedules of high dose epirubicin

Epirubicin, a stereoisomer of doxorubicin, is reported to have equal antitumor activity with lower cardiac and systemic toxicity. Recently the maximum tolerated dose of this drug has been revised upwards with reported increased response rates. However, the pharmacokinetics of epirubicin at high doses have never been reported. Accordingly, this study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of epirubicin when administered as either a 15-min i.v. bolus or a 6-h i.v. infusion in a phase I study at high doses. Nineteen patients with a variety of malignancies were given a total of 52 cycles of epirubicin at doses of 90 to 150 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose was 150 mg/m2 epirubicin given either as a bolus or as an infusion. The major dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Interpatient variation occurred in the pharmacokinetics at each dose level but overall there were dose-dependent pharmacokinetics. This was manifested as a disproportionate increase in plasma levels and areas under the curve as the epirubicin dose was increased from 90 to 150 mg/m2. The pharmacokinetics of epirubicin could best be described by an open two-compartment model. Peak plasma concentrations were attained at a median of 12 min following the bolus injection and concentrations approached the steady state within a median of 55 min following the start of the 6-h infusion. Administration of the 150 mg/m2 dose over the 6 h compared to the bolus administration was associated with a 92% decrease in peak concentration from 3088 +/- 1503 to 234 +/- 126 ng/ml. This was not associated with an appreciable change in hematological or nonhematological toxicities. The median distribution half-life was 10 min and the median elimination half-life was 42.0 h. The cumulative renal excretion of the parent compound accounted for less than 2% of the administered dose. The major metabolites in both plasma and urine samples were 4'-O-beta-D-glucuronyl-4'-epidoxorubicin, 13-S-dihydro-4'-epidoxorubicin, and 4'-O-beta-D-glucuronyl-13-S-dihydro-4'-epidoxorubicin. This study demonstrates that a 135 mg/m2 bolus infusion given on a 3-weekly schedule is an appropriate initial dose for further clinical studies.     

Decreased cardiac toxicity of doxorubicin administered by continuous intravenous infusion in combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast carcinoma

Two hundred and seventy-four consecutive patients with measurable metastatic breast cancer, without prior exposure to cytotoxic agents were treated with tamoxifen, 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC). The initial 133 patients received doxorubicin by bolus IV administration and for the next group of 141 patients doxorubicin was administered via a central venous catheter over a 48-hour (79 patients) or 96-hour (62 patients) continuous infusion schedule. Patients treated with bolus doxorubicin had this agent discontinued usually when 450 mg/m2 were reached; for patients in the infusion group treatment was continued until evidence of progressive disease or clinical or subclinical cardiac dysfunction developed. The complete remission rate was 21% the partial remission rate, 59%. There were no differences in response rate, response duration, or survival duration between groups of patients treated with doxorubicin by bolus, 48-hour or 96-hour infusion FAC. The incidence of moderate and severe nausea and vomiting was lower in the group of patients treated with infusion FAC as compared to bolus FAC (P less than 0.001); however, the incidence of mucositis was higher in the infusion group than in the bolus group (P less than 0.001). Doxorubicin administered by continuous infusion schedules was less cardiotoxic than when administered by bolus, as shown by a greater than 75% decrease in the frequency of clinical congestive heart failure at cumulative dosages greater than or equal to 450 mg/m2 (P = 0.004). Doxorubicin administered as a 48-hour or 96-hour continuous IV infusion is safer, and better tolerated than doxorubicin administered by bolus.     

Paclitaxel by 72-hour continuous infusion followed by bolus intravenous ifosfamide or epirubicin: results of two phase I studies

STUDY PURPOSES: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel administered by 72-hour continuous infusion followed by bolus intravenous ifosfamide on days 4 and 5 or epirubicin on day 4, every 21 days. To assess the toxicity and preliminary activity in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with progressive disease after standard chemotherapy for advanced disease were treated with the combination paclitaxel-ifosfamide and 10 patients with the combination paclitaxel-epirubicin. RESULTS: In the first phase I study the MTDs were: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 2.5 mg/m2/day; hematologic toxicity was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first cycle of therapy at dose level 4. Paclitaxel administered at 135 mg/m2 and epirubicin 50 mg/m2 were the MTDs in the second phase I study; grade 4 stomatitis was the DLT of this combination. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel by 72-hour continuous infusion followed by bolus ifosfamide was a manageable regimen with an acceptable hematologic toxicity in the absence of neurotoxicity. Preliminary activity of this combination was encouraging in a group of patients with ovarian cancer. The optimal way to combine paclitaxel and epirubicin and the best schedule relative to such a long paclitaxel infusion time in this combination regimen remain to be determined.     

Doxorubicin and paclitaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10961 Multicenter Phase III Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) with a standard doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) regimen as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were anthracycline-naive and had bidimensionally measurable metastatic breast cancer. Two hundred seventy-five patients were randomly assigned to be treated with AT (doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) as an intravenous bolus plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) as a 3-hour infusion) or AC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. A paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m(2)) dose escalation was planned at cycle 2 if no grade >or= 3 neutropenia occurred in cycle 1. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were response rate (RR), safety, overall survival (OS), and quality of life. RESULTS: A median number of six cycles were delivered in the two treatment arms. The relative dose-intensity and delivered cumulative dose of doxorubicin were lower in the AT arm. Dose escalation was only possible in 17% and 20% of the AT and AC patients, respectively. Median PFS was 6 months in the two treatments arms. RR was 58% versus 54%, and median OS was 20.6 versus 20.5 months in the AT and AC arms, respectively. The AT regimen was characterized by a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia, 32% versus 9% in the AC arm. CONCLUSION: No differences in the efficacy study end points were observed between the two treatment arms. Treatment-related toxicity compromised doxorubicin-delivered dose-intensity in the paclitaxel-based regimen     

A prospective randomized comparison of epirubicin and doxorubicin in patients with advanced breast cancer

Fifty-four patients with advanced breast cancer who had failed prior non-anthracycline combination chemotherapy were randomized to treatment with either epirubicin 85 mg/m2 or doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 intravenously every three weeks. Of 52 evaluable patients, 25% (six of 24) treated with epirubicin, and 25% (seven of 28) treated with doxorubicin experienced major therapeutic responses. The median duration of response to epirubicin was 11.9 months compared to 7.1 months with doxorubicin. Cardiotoxicity was monitored by serial multigated radionuclide cineangiocardiography performed at rest and after exercise. Laboratory evidence of cardiotoxicity was defined as a decrease in resting left ventricular ejection fraction of greater than 10% from the baseline value, or a decrease of 5% or greater with exercise compared with the resting study performed on the same day. Fifteen patients treated with epirubicin and 18 patients treated with doxorubicin had at least two determinations of left ventricular ejection fraction and were evaluable for laboratory cardiotoxicity. Using methods of survival analysis, the median doses to the development of laboratory cardiotoxicity were estimated to be 935 mg/m2 of epirubicin and 468 mg/m2 of doxorubicin. Four patients treated with epirubicin and five treated with doxorubicin developed symptomatic congestive heart failure. The median cumulative dose at which congestive heart failure occurred was 1,134 mg/m2 of epirubicin compared with 492 mg/m2 of doxorubicin. Fewer episodes of nausea and vomiting were observed in patients receiving epirubicin. Epirubicin is a new anthracycline with reduced cardiac toxicity, but preserved efficacy in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer.     

Prospective randomized phase III trial of etoposide/cisplatin versus high-dose epirubicin/cisplatin in small-cell lung cancer

High-dose epirubicin plus cisplatin was compared with the reference regimen of etoposide/cisplatin in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Four hundred two previously untreated patients with SCLC were randomized to receive etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1-3 and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 or epirubicin 100 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days for a total of 6 cycles. Patients were stratified according to treatment center and extent of disease (limited disease, n = 207; extensive disease, n = 195). Patients with limited disease were treated with thoracic radiation therapy after completion of chemotherapy, and those who exhibited a complete response were advised to receive prophylactic cranial irradiation. The primary endpoint was survival, and secondary endpoints were time to progression (TTP), response, toxicity, and costs. Patient characteristics were generally well balanced in the 2 arms, even though more patients in the epirubicin/cisplatin arm had > 5% weight loss and poor Karnofsky performance index compared with the etoposide/cisplatin arm. One hundred thirty-four patients (66.3%) in the etoposide/cisplatin arm and 126 (63.0%) in the epirubicin/cisplatin arm received all 6 planned cycles of chemotherapy. Response rate, TTP, and survival did not differ significantly between the 2 arms. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and toxic deaths occurred more frequently in the etoposide/cisplatin arm. Epirubicin/cisplatin showed a similar activity with a slightly lower toxicity profile than the reference regimen of etoposide/cisplatin. The epirubicin/cisplatin regimen may be recommended in the treatment of SCLC.     

Doxorubicin followed by sequential paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide versus concurrent paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide: 5-year results of a phase II randomized trial of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy for women with node-positive breast carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized Phase II trial to directly compare toxicity, feasibility, and delivered dose intensities of two adjuvant dose-intensive regimens containing doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide for patients with node-positive breast carcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Forty-two patients with resected breast carcinoma involving one or more ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes, were randomized to receive two different schedules of adjuvant chemotherapy using 14-day dosing intervals: either (a) three cycles of doxorubicin 80 mg/m(2) as i.v. bolus followed sequentially by three cycles of paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) as a 24-h infusion and then by three cycles of cyclophosphamide 3.0 g/m(2) as a 1-h infusion (arm A); or (b) the same schedule of doxorubicin followed by three cycles of concurrent cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel at the same doses (arm B). All cycles were supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were assessable for toxicity and feasibility; 37 (90%) completed all planned chemotherapy. There was no treatment-related mortality; however, increased toxicity was observed on arm B compared with arm A, manifested by an increase in hospitalization for toxicity, mainly neutropenic fever, and an increased incidence of transfusion of packed RBCs transfusions for anemia. The mean delivered dose intensities for paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide were significantly greater for arm A compared with arm B (P =.01 and P =.05, respectively). There is no long-term, treatment-related toxicity, and no cases of acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome have been observed. CONCLUSIONS: Dose-dense sequential single-agent chemotherapy is more feasible than doxorubicin with subsequent concurrent paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide.     

A randomised phase II study of conventional versus accelerated infusional chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allows cycles of conventional bolus chemotherapy to be accelerated with reduction in treatment time and a boost in dose intensity. Theoretically, this approach could be hazardous with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy, since G-CSF-stimulated neutrophil proliferation would be occurring in the face of continuous S-phase active 5-FU. We performed this phase II randomised study to compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of conventional 3-weekly epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and continuous infusional 5-FU (infusional ECF) to an accelerated 2-weekly schedule with G-CSF support, in patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients were randomised. with 14 in the accelerated arm. Patients received bolus epirubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (conventional arm) or every 2 weeks (accelerated arm) and 5-FU 200 mg/m2/day continuous infusion throughout. G-CSF 300 microg/day s.c. on days 10-12 was given each accelerated cycle. RESULTS: There were no treatment delays secondary to inadequate neutrophil or platelet recovery in either arm, with higher median day 1 neutrophil counts for each cycle in the accelerated arm compared with the conventional arm. Eighty-six per cent of the planned conventional chemotherapy cycles and 82% of the planned accelerated cycles were given. There were no major differences in toxicity between the arms, with the most common grade 3 toxicities being alopecia and stomatitis. Eight patients developed neutropenic sepsis (five in the accelerated arm and three in the conventional arm). Ten patients (77%) responded in the conventional arm and nine (64%) in the accelerated arm. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated infusional ECF with limited G-CSF support is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen with rapid haematological recovery. A 50% increase in relative dose intensity of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide is achieved, while overall treatment time is reduced by 33%.     

Docetaxel and epirubicin as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network Phase II trial

BACKGROUND: Taxanes and anthracyclines are the two most active classes of cytotoxic agents in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Epirubicin, a doxorubicin analog, has shown modest toxicity advantages when compared to the parent compound. In this Phase II trial, we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a docetaxel/epirubicin combination. METHODS: Thirty patients with previously untreated metastatic breast cancer were treated with docetaxel 60 mg/m2 one-hour IV infusion and epirubicin 90 mg/m2 IV bolus; both drugs were repeated at 21-day intervals. Patients were evaluated for response after 2 courses of treatment; responding and stable patients continued treatment for a total of 6 courses. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (50 percent) had objective response to treatment; an additional 20 percent of patients had stable disease of more then 6 months duration. The median and 2-year progression-free survivals were 12 months and 34 percent, respectively. Median and 2-year overall survivals were 18 months and 42 percent, respectively. Myelosuppression was the most common Grade 3/4 toxicity, and 2 patients in this trial (6 percent) had treatment-related mortality associated with severe sepsis. CONCLUSION: The results of this Phase II trial confirm previous observations regarding the efficacy and toxicity profile of the docetaxel/epirubicin combination. This combination has activity similar to other taxane/anthracycline combinations used in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer.     

A randomized phase II trial of continuous infusion interleukin-2 or bolus injection interleukin-2 plus lymphokine-activated killer cells for advanced renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Since 1985, multiple centers have demonstrated that interleukin-2 (IL-2) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells produce durable anticancer responses in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. High-dose recombinant IL-2 (rIL-2) has been administered by intravenous bolus injection (Rosenberg SA, et al: N Engl J Med 313:1485-1492, 1985) and by continuous intravenous infusion (West WH, et al: N Engl J Med 316:898-905, 1987) combined with lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells, with both methods producing responses in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. The Extramural IL-2/LAK Working Group has conducted a randomized phase II trial of two intravenous high-dose rIL-2 regimens (bolus three times daily or 24-hour continuous infusion) to determine if either one manifests greater anticancer activity or a more acceptable toxicity profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-four patients with measurable advanced renal cell carcinoma were enrolled on this study: 46 to the bolus injection arm and 48 to the continuous infusion arm. On both arms, patients underwent a priming phase of rIL-2 administration, four daily lymphocytaphereses to harvest mononuclear cells that were placed in 3- to 4-day culture for generation of LAK cells, and an rIL-2/LAK coadministration phase. Patients were then observed monthly for evidence of response to this therapy and were offered up to two additional courses of treatment every 3 months if evidence of response was detected. RESULTS: Twenty percent of patients on the bolus injection arm experienced objective responses (three complete responses and six partial responses); 15% of patients on the continuous infusion arm responded (two complete responses and five partial responses). Complete responses were durable, persisting for 310+ to 700+ days. The incidence of severe life-threatening toxicities typical of high-dose rIL-2 therapy was similar in both arms (eg, patients with hypotension requiring pressors: bolus 71%, continuous 63%; oliguria less than or equal to 200 mL/8 hours: bolus 65%, continuous 71%). More episodes of fever, infection, and serum alkaline phosphatase elevation were associated with the continuous infusion arm, while more thrombocytopenia occurred on the bolus injection arm. Four patients (three bolus injection, one continuous infusion) died of respiratory and circulatory failure while under treatment. No clinical or laboratory parameter accompanying treatment on either arm was, by univariate or multivariate analysis, associated with an increased likelihood of response. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods of high-dose rIL-2/LAK cell administration produce nearly equivalent anticancer activity and toxicity in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. The ability to predict responding patients based on patient or treatment characteristics is not possible.     

Fluorouracil modulation in colorectal cancer: lack of improvement with N -phosphonoacetyl- l -aspartic acid or oral leucovorin or interferon, but enhanced therapeutic index with weekly 24-hour infusion schedule--an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate mechanism-directed regimens in maximizing the efficacy of fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced colorected cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Based on promising phase II data, a randomized comparison of various methods for the biochemical modulation of 5-FU was undertaken in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The control group received single-agent 5-FU as a 24-hour infusion weekly. Patients (N = 1,120) with no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomized to one of the following arms: arm A, 5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion, weekly; arm B, N-phosphonoacetyl-l-aspartic acid 250 mg/m2 day l, 5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion day 2, weekly; arm C, 5-FU 600 mg/m2 with oral leucovorin (LV) 125 mg/m2 hourly for the preceding 4 hours, weekly; arm D, 5-FU 600 mg/m2 with intravenous (IV) LV 600 mg/m2, weekly; arm E, 5-FU 750 mg/m2/d IV by continuous infusion for 5 days, then 750 mg/m2 weekly, and recombinant interferon alfa-2a 9 million units subcutaneously three times weekly. Median follow-up was 4.8 years. RESULTS: Of the 1,098 assessable patients, 57% had measurable disease. The toxicity of all the regimens was tolerable. Grade 4 or worse toxicity occurred in 11%, 11%, 30%, 24%, and 22% on each arm, respectively; diarrhea was the most common adverse effect. These toxicity patterns favored significantly (P <.001) the 24-hour infusion arms. Median survival (months) by arm was A, 14.8; B, 11.9; C, 13.5; D, 13.6; and E, 15.2. These survival durations did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a weekly infusion regimen of 5-FU is significantly less toxic than and as effective as 5-FU bolus regimens modulated by either LV or interferon in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Randomized clinical trial comparing mitoxantrone with epirubicin and with doxorubicin, each combined with cyclophosphamide in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer

Two hundred and twenty-four patients with advanced breast cancer were enrolled in a multicenter prospective randomized clinical study and received either doxorubicin (40 mg/m2), or epirubicin (40 mg/m2) or mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2) each combined with cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) i.v. In the patient collective the following response rates were observed: complete response 12.1%; partial response 30.6%; stable disease 40.5%; progressive disease 16.8%. A complete response was observed significantly less often in patients where more than one organ site was involved as compared to those patients with only one metastatic site. The mean time period required to reach a best response was 3.7 months. There was no significant difference between the response rates in the three arms. In comparing the observed toxicities in 1,434 treatment cycles, there was a significant difference with regard to leukocytopenia (mitoxantrone arm exhibiting more than either epirubicin and doxorubicin) although infections did not occur more frequently in the mitoxantrone arm; with regard to alopecia, mitoxantrone and epirubicin arms both exhibited less than doxorubicin. It is noteworthy that no patient who had previously received adjuvant chemotherapy achieved a complete response (p = 0.006). The overall significance of these findings can only be clearly evaluated when survival times can be measured.     

Phase I-II Vinorelbine (Navelbine®) by Continuous Infusion in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Cumulative Toxicities Limit Dose Escalation

Vinorelbine (Navelbine®) has significant activity against breast carcinoma and is less neurotoxic than vinblastine. Because vinblastine has improved activity when administered by continuous infusion, we conducted a Phase I-II study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vinorelbine when given by continuous infusion and the response rates to it in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. Between April 1994 and August 1997, 87 patients were entered in the study. All were female and had proven metastatic breast cancer. Ninety-five percent of them had received prior doxorubicin treatment, and 74% had received prior paclitaxel treatment. In Phase I of the study, all patients received 8 mg of vinorelbine by intravenous (i.v.) bolus followed by a continuous infusion of vinorelbine over 96 hr. When the MTD was determined, patients were entered in the Phase II arm to assess treatment responses and cumulative toxic reactions. In the Phase I arm (43 patients, 182 cycles), we determined the MTD of vinorelbine to be 8 mg by i.v. bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 11 mg/m2/day over 4 days. The dose-limiting toxic reaction was grade 3-4 granulocytopenia in 35% of the cycles and neutropenic fever in 15% of the cycles. Forty-four patients (193 cycles) were treated at the MTD. Seven (16%) of them had a response (2 complete responses, 5 partial responses). The median durations of response and survival were 4.3 and 8.6 months, respectively. However, cumulative toxic reactions (neutropenic fever and stomatitis) in 22 patients (50%) required dose reductions. A continuous infusion of vinorelbine can be safely administered but with a narrow therapeutic index because of cumulative toxic reactions. We recommend a modified MTD of vinorelbine: 8 mg by i.v. bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 10 mg/m2/day over 4 days. However, this treatment schedule offers no apparent advantage over the commonly used weekly vinorelbine schedule.     

Economic analyses of toxicity secondary to anthracycline-based breast cancer chemotherapy

Doxorubicin (D) is one of the most active agents in the treatment of breast cancer but can be associated with cardiotoxicity (CT) and febrile neutropenia (FN). Epirubicin, a stereoisomer of doxorubicin, is reported to have similar efficacy but reduced toxicity. A retrospective chart audit was performed to estimate the incidence, average length of hospitalisation and resource consumption for the management of CT and FN in 200 patients breast cancer patients receiving equidoses of doxorubicin or epirubicin. Overall, there were three more episodes of CT in the doxorubicin group than in epirubicin patients (five versus two) at a cost of Canadian dollars C$4268/episode. With regard to FN, there were 11 more episodes in the doxorubicin arm (25 versus 14) at a cost of C$5419/episode. The results of the study support the substitution of equidose epirubicin for doxorubicin in women undergoing treatment for malignancies of the breast. Such a policy may result in reduced toxicity-related management costs.     

FDA drug approval summaries: oxaliplatin

The purpose of this report is to summarize information on oxaliplatin, a drug recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Information provided includes regulatory history, study design, efficacy and safety results, and pertinent literature references. A single, multicenter, randomized trial, enrolling 463 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma whose disease had recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of therapy with the combination of bolus 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan, was submitted. Study arms included infusional 5-FU/LV alone (arm A), oxaliplatin alone (arm B), and the combination of oxaliplatin and infusional 5-FU/LV(arm C). Oxaliplatin, at a dose of 85 mg/m2, was administered to patients in arms B and C intravenously over 2 hours in 250-500 ml of dextrose 5% in water (D5W) on day 1 only. A 200-mg/m2 dose of LV was administered simultaneously to arm C patients, in a separate bag using a Y-line, or alone to arm A patients, by i.v. infusion, over 2 hours. 5-FU was then administered to arms A and C patients, first as a bolus injection over 2-4 minutes at a dose of 400 mg/m2, then as a continuous infusion in 500 ml of D5W over 22 hours at a dose of 600 mg/m2. LV was repeated on day 2 of the cycle (arms A and C) followed by a 400-mg/m2 5-FU bolus and a 600-mg/m2 22-hour infusion. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks. Response rate was the prespecified end point for accelerated approval. Time to progression (TTP) was a secondary end point. The prespecified primary comparison was between the 5-FU/LV regimen and the 5-FU/LV/ oxaliplatin combination regimen. The three arms were well balanced for patient prognostic factors. There were no complete responders. The partial response rates were 0%, 1%, and 9% for the 5-FU/LV, oxaliplatin, and oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV treatments, respectively (p = 0.0002, arm C versus arm A). The median times to radiographic tumor progression, based on available radiographs, were 2.7 months, 1.6 months, and 4.6 months, respectively (p < 0.0001, arm C versus arm A). Common adverse events associated with the combination treatment included peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and abdominal pain. Neutropenia was the major hematologic toxicity. Adverse events were similar in men and women and in patients <65 and > or =65 years of age, but older patients may have been more susceptible to dehydration, diarrhea, hypokalemia, and fatigue. Oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-FU/LV was approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum whose disease has recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of first-line therapy with the combination of bolus 5-FU/LV and irinotecan. Approval was based on response rate and on an interim analysis of TTP. No results are available, at this time, that demonstrate a clinical benefit, such as improvement in disease-related symptoms or survival.     

High-dose epirubicin is not an alternative to standard-dose doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas. A study of the EORTC soft tissue and bone sarcoma group.

The activity and toxicity of single-agent standard-dose doxorubicin were compared with that of two schedules of high-dose epirubicin. A total of 334 chemonaive patients with histologically confirmed advanced soft-tissue sarcomas received (A) doxorubicin 75 mg m(-2) on day 1 (112 patients), (B) epirubicin 150 mg m(-2) on day 1 (111 patients) or (C) epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) day(-1) on days 1, 2 and 3 (111 patients); all given as bolus injection at 3-week intervals. A median of four treatment cycles was given. Median age was 52 years (19-70 years) and performance score 1 (0-2). Of 314 evaluable patients, 45 (14%) had an objective tumour response (eight complete response, 35 partial response). There were no differences among the three groups. Median time to progression for groups A, B and C was 16, 14 and 12 weeks, and median survival 45, 47 and 45 weeks respectively. Neither progression-free (P = 0.93) nor overall survival (P = 0.89) differed among the three groups. After the first cycle of therapy, two patients died of infection and one owing to cardiovascular disease, all on epirubicin. Both dose schedules of epirubicin were more myelotoxic than doxorubicin. Cardiotoxicity (> or = grade 3) occurred in 1%, 0% and 2% respectively. Regardless of the schedule, high-dose epirubicin is not a preferred alternative to standard-dose doxorubicin in the treatment of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas.     

Intra-arterial administration of epirubicin in the treatment of non-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Epirubicin Study Group for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A group study was conducted to investigate the effect of intra-hepatic arterial administration of epirubicin in the treatment of non-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). Sixty-four patients were entered into the study. There were 51 males and 13 females, with an age range from 32 to 79 years, the average being 59.1 years. Fifty-four patients had associated cirrhosis of the liver. Epirubicin at a dose of 60-90 mg/m2 was infused as a bolus into the hepatic artery 1 to 4 times (average 1.8) at an interval of 3 weeks to 3 months. Tumor size was properly evaluated in 53 patients. There were 1 CR, 7 PR, 7 MR, 27 NC, and 11 PD. Thus, the response rate (CR + PR) was 15.1%. Seventeen patients are still alive 305 to 720 days (mean 505 days) after the initial treatment. The most common side effects of this drug were bone marrow suppression, gastrointestinal complaints, and alopecia. Cardiac toxicity was negligible at the doses used in this study. A retrospective comparison of the present results with those for patients treated by intra-arterial administration of doxorubicin demonstrated that epirubicin is more effective than doxorubicin in terms of survival rate. The current study indicates that epirubicin may be a promising alternative in the treatment of HCC. The appropriate dosage of the drug and the interval for infusion are to be elucidated. Also, the combination of epirubicin with other cytostatic drugs is open for study.     

Clinical toxicity of 4'-epi-doxorubicin (epirubicin)

Epirubicin is a new derivative of doxorubicin characterized by an improved spectrum of activity and a better therapeutic index. At equimolar doses and in comparative studies, epirubicin proved to induce less acute toxicity than doxorubicin, in particular less vomiting, hair loss and myelotoxicity. While giving a comparable response rate in randomized breast cancer studies, epirubicin also proved to be less cardiotoxic than doxorubicin. The reduced potential for cardiac toxicity of epirubicin versus doxorubicin has been shown both by functional assessment (radionuclide cinecardioangiography) and by histopathologic evaluation (endomyocardial biopsies) at equally myelosuppressive doses or at equal doses (equimolar). The lessened cardiotoxicity of epirubicin versus doxorubicin can be explained by the different pharmacokinetic and metabolic properties of these two agents: epirubicin has been found to have a more rapid pharmacokinetic plasma clearance and an additional metabolic pathway (unique glucuronidation).     

A phase II study of epirubicin, cisplatin and uracil-tegafur for advanced gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Due to its greater convenience, a combination of uracil and tegafur (referred to as UFT) taken orally is an attractive alternative to continuous intravenous (i.v.) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion. This phase II study assessed the response rate and toxicity profile of the combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and UFT in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach. METHODS: Epirubicin (50 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) were administered i.v. to 35 patients with metastatic gastric carcinoma on day 1, and subsequently UFT (300 mg/m(2)/day) was administered orally in divided doses for 21 days. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. The response rate, time to disease progression, survival and toxic effects were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-two of the 35 enrolled patients were assessed subsequently for response. The median number of cycles was four. Thirteen patients (40.6%) showed partial responses, while none showed a complete response. The median time to progression of carcinoma was 20.4 weeks, and the median survival was 37 weeks. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in 25% of patients. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting was observed in 28% of patients. No treatment-related death was observed. All patients received doses as planned, except for one who required a 75% dose reduction due to nephrotoxicity. Six of 132 cycles were delayed >7 days after four cycles. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and UFT showed anticancer activity against metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma, had a tolerable toxicity profile and showed excellent patient compliance.