Effects of pregnancy and contraception on lamotrigine disposition: new insights through analysis of lamotrigine metabolites.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate possible underlying mechanisms for alterations in lamotrigine (LTG) kinetics by gestation and use of contraceptives. METHODS: Plasma concentrations of LTG and its main metabolite lamotrigine-2-N-glucuronide (2-N-GLUC) were measured in 31 women on LTG taking combined oral contraceptives (COC), in 12 with contraceptive intrauterine devices containing levonorgestrel (CIUD), and in 20 on LTG without hormonal contraception (controls). We also measured the levels of LTG and 2-N-GLUC in plasma and urine in eight women during pregnancy, and up to three months postpartum. LTG levels in plasma were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography method (HPLC) and N-2-GLUC in urine and plasma and LTG in urine by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in LTG dose/concentration (D/C), or N-2-GLUC/LTG ratios between women with CIUD and controls. In contrast, compared to controls, the LTG D/C ratio was 56% higher in women taking COC (mean+/-SD, 83+/-47 versus 53.0+/-24.2; p<0.01) and N-2-GLUC/LTG ratio 82% higher in women taking COC (mean 0.477+/-0.212 SD versus 0.262+/-0.127; p<0.0003. The 2-GLUC/LTG ratios were 154% higher in plasma and 122% higher in urine in late pregnancy compared with baseline 3months postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the alterations in LTG kinetics in pregnancy as well as those induced by COC are mainly explained by enzymatic induction of the N-2-glucuronide pathway. In addition we found no evidence for an interaction between LTG and CIUD.     

Do Anticonvulsants Reduce the Efficacy of Oral Contraceptives?

Women in our area with epilepsy who were also taking oral contraceptives were identified. Of 82 patients taking oral contraceptives, 41 had used both anticonvulsants and oral contraceptives for a total of 955 months. Three documented oral contraceptive (pill) failures occurred during this period, whereas the expected number of 0.12 (relative risk, 25; 95% confience interval, 5 to 73). No pill failures were observed in 2,278 months among women with epilepsy who were taking oral contraceptives but who were not taking anticonvulsants at this time. Thus our data support the suggestion that there is an increased rate of pill failure among women taking anticonvulsants. In view of this diminished effectiveness, the advisability of using oral contraceptives rather than one of the other forms of contraception when anticonvulsant medication is being used concurrently may need to be reevaluated.     

The effect of lamotrigine on epileptiform discharges in young patients with drug-resistant epilepsy

PURPOSE: In a double-blind crossover study with lamotrigine (LTG), we investigated a possible relationship between the clinical responses and changes of the amount of epileptiform activity in EEG. METHODS: Twelve patients, aged 4-21 years, with generalized drug-resistant epilepsy who had responded to LTG, completed the study. Twenty-four-hour video-EEGs were taken during control, placebo, and drug phases. The amounts of epileptiform discharges were estimated and compared with the clinical effects. RESULTS: The duration of periods of repeated epileptiform discharges was significantly reduced during the LTG phase compared with the placebo phase (n = 12, p = 0.04). Ten patients showed a reduction of the amount of epileptiform discharges in the LTG phase by a mean of 81% (range, 17-100%). Periods of repeated epileptiform discharges with duration longer than 30 s were significantly reduced in length (p = 0.03) and number (p = 0.04) during the LTG phase compared with the placebo phase. Shorter periods of epileptiform discharges and the numbers of single epileptiform discharges were not affected. In five patients there was a seizure reduction (>/=50%) concomitant with the reduction of epileptiform discharges in the EEG. The behavior improved during LTG treatment in all patients. The patients became more alert, and their concentration and performance improved, according to their parents and the medical personnel. CONCLUSIONS: LTG in dosages of 1-8 mg/kg body weight was found to depress relatively long episodes of interictal, repetitive, epileptiform activity in young patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, whereas short episodes were not affected. It depressed seizures in about half of the patients studied but gave improvements of behavior in all patients.     

Induction of Ethinylestradiol and Levonorgestrel Metabolism by Oxcarbazepine in Healthy Women

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of oxcarbazepine (OCBZ) on the pharmacokinetic profile of steroid oral contraceptives. METHODS: Twenty-two healthy women aged 18-44 years were recruited, and 16 of them completed the study. By using a randomized double-blind crossover design, each woman was studied in two different menstrual cycles, during which placebo or OCBZ (maintenance dosage, 1,200 mg/day) was given in randomized sequence for 26 consecutive days with a washout of at least one cycle in between. A steroid oral contraceptive containing 50 microg ethinylestradiol (EE) and 250 microg levonorgestrel (LN) was taken for the first 21 days of each cycle. Plasma concentrations of EE and LN were measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in samples collected at regular intervals on days 21-23 of each cycle. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, areas under the plasma concentration curves (AUC(0-24h, geometric means) decreased by 47% for both EE (from 1,677 to 886 pg.h/ml; p < 0.01) and LN (from 137 to 73 ng.h/ml; p < 0.01), during OCBZ treatment. Peak plasma EE concentrations decreased from 180 pg/ml during the placebo cycle to 117 pg/ml during the OCBZ cycle (p < 0.01), whereas peak plasma LN concentrations decreased from 10.2 to 7.7 ng/ml (p < 0.01). The half-lives of EE and LN also decreased from 13.6 to 7.9 h (p < 0.01) and from 28.8 to 15.8 h, respectively (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: OCBZ reduces plasma concentrations of the estrogen and progestagen components of steroid oral contraceptives, presumably by stimulating their CYP3A-mediated metabolism in the liver or gastrointestinal tract or both. Because this may lead to a decreased efficacy of the contraceptive pill, women treated with OCBZ should receive preferentially a high-dosage contraceptive and should be monitored for signs of reduced hormonal cover.     

Concerns regarding lamotrigine and breast-feeding

PURPOSE: Many women with epilepsy who are planning a pregnancy are treated with lamotrigine (LTG), resulting in greater fetal exposure to the drug. Current care guidelines suggest that mothers with epilepsy breast-feed their children. These recommendations are made without regard to how nursing newborns metabolize medication. Lamotrigine is extensively metabolized by glucuronidation, which is immature in neonates and may lead to accumulation of medication. This article reports LTG levels in full-term nursing newborns born to mothers with epilepsy on lamotrigine monotherapy. METHODS: Serum LTG levels were obtained in nursing mothers and their neonates on Day 10 of life. Maternal LTG clearance during pregnancy and postpartum was determined and correlated with levels. RESULTS: Four mothers with partial epilepsy on LTG monotherapy were evaluated. Serum LTG levels in nursing newborns ranged from <1.0 to 2.0 microg/mL on Day 10 of life. Three babies had LTG levels >1.0 microg/mL. After excluding one child with an undetectable level, the LTG levels in newborns were on average 30% (range 20-43%) of the maternal drug level. No decline was noted in two children with repeat levels at 2 months. CONCLUSION: Serum concentrations of LTG in breast-fed children were higher than expected, in some cases reaching "therapeutic" ranges. These high levels may be explained by poor neonatal drug elimination due to inefficient glucuronidation. Our observation that not all newborns had a high LTG level suggests considerable genetic variability in metabolism. Our limited data suggest monitoring blood levels in nursing children and the need for individual counseling for women with epilepsy regarding breast-feeding.     

Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of oral loading with lamotrigine in epilepsy monitoring units

PURPOSE: To investigate the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of oral loading with lamotrigine (LTG) among epilepsy patients after temporary drug discontinuation in an epilepsy monitoring unit. METHODS: We conducted a pilot study among epilepsy patients (18 years or older) receiving maintenance doses of LTG. LTG was discontinued on admission and restarted at the end of epilepsy monitoring. LTG was given as a single oral dose calculated based on the population expected volume of distribution (Vd, 1.0 L/kg) and target blood level on admission. Baseline and serial blood levels of LTG were determined hourly for 10 to 12 h after the loading dose. Outcome measures: (a) frequency of patients with side effects; (b) time to maximum concentration (Tmax), maximum concentration (Cmax), actual volume of distribution, and half-life. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received a single oral load of LTG (mean, 6.5 +/- 2.7 mg/kg). Overall, LTG loading was well tolerated with no serious adverse events or skin rash observed. Two patients had transient and mild nausea 1 to 2 h after the oral load. The mean estimated pharmacokinetic parameters are as follows: Tmax, 3.1 +/- 2.1 h; Cmax, 8.2 +/- 6.5 mg/L; Vd, 1.1 +/- 1.0 L/kg; clearance, 0.08 +/- 0.08 mg/L/h; half-life, 22 +/- 30 h. All patients reached their target blood levels. CONCLUSIONS: Epilepsy patients temporarily discontinued from LTG can be restarted with a single oral loading dose. This was well tolerated, and therapeutic levels can be achieved within 1 to 3 h.     

Variation in lamotrigine plasma concentrations with hormonal contraceptive monthly cycles in patients with epilepsy

PURPOSE: This is the first report comparing intrasubject lamotrigine (LTG) plasma concentrations between hormonal contraceptive (HC) intake and week-off phases in epilepsy patients receiving combined LTG and HC treatment. We describe the variation in LTG plasma concentrations with hormonal contraceptive (HC) monthly intake cycles in a series of eight patients with epilepsy. METHODS: Venous blood samples were prospectively drawn from patients before their first morning dose of LTG, once between days 18 and 21 of HC intake and once between days 5 and 7 of the HC-free week. RESULTS: Median LTG plasma concentrations were significantly higher during the HC washout week than during the phase of HC intake (p = 0.02). The median value of intrasubject percentage increase was 27%, with a wide interpatient variability. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are in line with a preliminary report on healthy volunteers. Standardization of blood sampling in relation to HC intake cycles is advisable when planning LTG therapeutic monitoring in patients receiving HC.     

Levetiracetam does not alter the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive in healthy women

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate whether levetiracetam, a novel antiepileptic drug (AED), influences the pharmacokinetics of steroid oral contraceptives. METHODS: During a run-in phase, 18 healthy female patients received an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol, 0.03 mg, and levonorgestrel, 0.15 mg, for the first 21 days of two consecutive menstrual cycles. In a subsequent double-blind, randomized, two-way crossover treatment phase, subjects received either levetiracetam, 500 mg, or placebo twice daily concomitant with the oral contraceptive. Plasma concentrations of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel were measured on days 14 and 15 of the two treatment periods for the evaluation of the 24-h kinetic parameters, and an additional sample was collected on day 21 to determine the trough plasma concentrations. Serum progesterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels were determined on days 13, 14, 15, and 21 of each cycle of the treatment phase. RESULTS: The plasma concentration-time curves and pharmacokinetic parameters of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel were not statistically different during concomitant treatment with either levetiracetam or placebo. The ratios of the log-transformed geometric mean areas under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUCs), maximal (Cmax) and minimal (Cmin) plasma concentrations, and trough concentrations on day 21 (C21) ranged from 99.12 to 99.96% for ethinyl estradiol and from 97.13 to 99.41% for levonorgestrel. The 90% confidence intervals of these ratios were well within the 80 to 125% acceptance range for lack of interaction. Serum progesterone and LH concentrations were fairly constant during the run-in and treatment phases and remained markedly below their respective physiologic levels. Safety and menstrual-bleeding patterns were comparable during levetiracetam and placebo administration. CONCLUSIONS: Levetiracetam does not affect the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel, and on the basis of serum progesterone and LH levels, it does not affect the contraceptive efficacy.     

Human Safety of Lamotrigine

Summary: The clinical safety of lamotrigine (LTG), assessed in four completed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trials and an interim analysis of 27 12-month open studies, is discussed. LTG was added to existing anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) of adult patients with refractory epilepsy, using a twice-daily regimen. In the pooled data from the four double-blind studies ( n = 92), the incidence of adverse experiences with LTG and placebo did not differ significantly. Two patients were withdrawn on LTG due to adverse experiences (one rash, one nausea and vomiting). In the open studies (pooled data; n = 572) the most commonly reported adverse experiences were dizziness, diplopia, somnolence, headache, ataxia, and asthenia (10–14% incidence). Forty-nine patients (8.6%) were withdrawn with adverse events, most commonly for rash (2.3%). No patients were withdrawn from any of the studies with physical, neurological, or ECG abnormalities thought attributable to LTG treatment. Laboratory measures, vital signs, and weight did not show any consistent changes of clinical significance, and no significant changes in plasma concentrations of concomitant AEDs after the addition of LTG were observed.     

Lamotrigine and Seizure Aggravation in Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose: In severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SME), multiple drug-resistant focal and generalized seizure types occur. Lamotrigine (LTG), found effective in many generalized and partial seizures, has been little used in severe childhood epilepsy syndromes with multiple seizure types. We studied the effects of LTG in SME.
Methods: Twenty-one patients with SME, aged 2–18 years, were treated with LTG, 20 in add-on and one in monotherapy. LTG was started at 0.2–2.5 mg/kg/day and increased to 2.5–12.5 mg/kg/day. For each seizure type, excluding atypical absences, >50% variations compared with the 2 months preceding LTG were considered indicators of response, also taking into account the degree of disability each seizure type produced.
Results: LTG induced worsening in 17 (80%) patients, no change in three, and improvement in one. There was >50% increase in convulsive seizures in eight (40%) of 20 patients. Myoclonic seizures worsened in six (33%) of 18 patients. Of five patients improving in at least one seizure type, four had concomitant worsening of more invalidating seizures. Clear-cut worsening appeared within 3 months in most patients but was insidious in some. LTG was suspended in 19 patients after 15 days-5 years (mean, 14 months) with consequent improvement in 18.
Conclusions: The pronounced seizure deterioration during LTG treatment was not attributable to the natural course of the disease and could be a direct effect of therapeutic LTG doses. LTG treatment seems inappropriate in SME.     

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study on the Effect of Vigabatrin on In Vivo Parameters of Hepatic Microsomal Enzyme Induction and on the Kinetics of Steroid Oral Contraceptives in Healthy Female Volunteers

Summary: Purpose: This study was conducted to determine whether vigabatrin affects in vivo indices of hepatic microsomal enzyme activity and the pharmacokinetics of steroid oral contraceptives in healthy subjects. Methods: Under double-blind conditions, 13 female healthy volunteers received, in random order and with a washout interval of ≤= 4 weeks, two oral 4-week treatments with vigabatrin (VGB) (maintenance dosage, 3,000 mg daily) and placebo, respectively. The clearance and half-life of antipyrine (a broad marker of drug oxidation capacity), the urinary excretion of 6-β-hydroxycortisol (a selective marker of cytochrome CYP3A-mediated oxidation), and the activity of serum γ-glutamyltransferase (a nonspecific index of microsomal enzyme activity) were determined after 3 weeks of each treatment. The single-dose kinetics of a combined oral contraceptive containing 30 μg ethinyl estradiol and 150 μg levonorgestrel were also determined after 3 weeks of treatment by specific radioimmunologic assays. Results: VGB treatment had no influence on antipyrine clearance (28 ± 5.6 vs. 30 ± 4.5 ml/h/kg on placebo), antipyrine half-life (15.5 ± 3.5 vs. 14.1 ± 2.1 h), urinary 6–β-hydroxycortisol excretion (488 ± 164 vs. 470 ± 228 nmol/day), 6-β-hydroxycortisol-to-cortisol concentration ratio (6.8 ± 3.1 vs. 6.1 ± 3.1) and serum γ-glutamyltransferase activity (12 ± 3 vs. 11 ± 3 IUIL). No difference in pharmacokinetic parameters between VGB and placebo sessions were found for ethinyl estradiol (half-life, 12.5 ± 3.2 vs. 13.9 ± 3.2 h; AUC, 874 ± 301 vs. 939 ± 272 ng/L/h) and levonorgestrel (half-life, 17.7 ± 5.2 vs. 23.1 ± 9.8 h; AUC, 27.5 ± 9.6 vs. 30.0 ± 12.0 μg/L/h). Two subjects, however, showed a 50 and a 39% reduction in ethinyl estradiol AUC during VGB treatment. Conclusions: At therapeutic dosages, VGB did not modify in vivo indices of hepatic microsomal enzyme activity and did not interfere significantly with the CYP3A-mediated metabolism of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel. Based on these data, VGB is unlikely to affect consistently the efficacy of steroid oral contraceptives or interact pharmacokinetically with drugs that are eliminated mainly by oxidative pathways, particularly those involving cytochrome CYP3A.     

Lamotrigine Therapy for Partial Seizures: A Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Trial

Summary: The efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG), a new antiepileptic drug (AED), were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study of 98 patients with refractory partial seizures. Each treatment period lasted 14 weeks. Most patients were titrated to a LTG maintenance dose of 400 mglday. Seizure frequency with LTG decreased by ≥50%, as compared with placebo, in one fifth of patients. Overall median seizure frequency decreased by 25% with LTG as compared with placebo (p < 0.001). With LTG, the number of seizure days decreased by 18% as compared with placebo (p < 0.01), and investigator global evaluation of overall patient clinical status favored LTG by 2: 1 (p = 0.013). Plasma LTG concentrations appeared to be linearly related to dosage. LTG had no clinically important effects on the plasma concentrations of concomitant AEds. Adverse experiences were generally minor and most frequently were CNS-related (e.g., ataxia, dizziness, diplopia, headache). Most were transient and resolved without discontinuing treatment. Five patients withdrew as a result of adverse experiences while receiving LTG, including 3 patients with rash. One placebo patient was also withdrawn because of rash. The addition of twice-daily LTG to an existing AED regimen was safe, effective, and well tolerated in these medically refractory partial seizure patients.     

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Lamotrigine and Other Antiepileptic Drugs in Children with Intractable Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose : We wished to determine the oral pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine LTG and to assess possible interactions with other AEDs in an unselected population of children. Concentration data in plasma and in CSF for lamotrigine as well as for the other AEDs are presented.
Methods : Thirty-one children, children and young adults aged > 2 years with intractable generalized epilepsy despite adequate duration and dose of at least three conventional AEDs were studied.
Results : There was a linear relation between the dose administered and the maximal plasma concentration, indicating that saturation of absorption or elimination mechanisms did not occur in the dose range studied. The median elimination half-life (t1/2) in patients receiving concomitant valproate (VPA) was 43.3 h; in patients receiving carbamazepine (CBZ) and/or phenobarbital (PB), it was 14.1 h; and in patients receiving both VPA and CBZI PB or other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), it was 28.9 h. No clinically important changes in the plasma levels of CBZ, VPA, valproate, ethosuximide, or PB were observed in the follow-up period (2–12 months). No dose adjustments of concomitant AEDs were necessary. The plasma concentration of clonazepam (CZP) was reduced when LTG was introduced.
Conclusions : The complex interaction between LTG and other AEDs in children with intractable epilepsy makes therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) desirable.     

The Efficacy of Lamotrigine in Children and Adolescents with Refractory Generalized Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study

Summary: Purpose: We report a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of lamotrigine (LTG) as add-on treatment in therapy-resistant, generalized epilepsy in children and adolescents (n = 30).
Methods: Twenty patients had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Each patient acted as his or her own control. LTG and placebo were randomly added to existing antiepileptic medication (AEDs). The LTG dosage was individualized in an open phase preceding the placebo/treatment phase. Patients who responded to LTG in the open phase went on to the double-blind phase. "Responders" were defined as patients with a >50% seizure reduction or less severe seizures or both, or improved behavior or improved motor skills or both. "Nonresponders" were defined as children who showed no positive effects of LTG with plasma levels of 10 μg/ml or children who had adverse events during the open phase.
Results: There was a clear statistically significant reduction of seizure frequency in LTG compared with placebo treatment. None of the children studied showed abnormal biochemical or hematologic findings, or changes in plasma levels of concomitantly administered AEDs.
Conclusions: LTG is a well-tolerated and effective treatment in children with intractable generalized epilepsies, including those with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The study design allowed a double-blind placebo-controlled assessment of LTG although the participating children used 19 different AED combinations at entry.     

Oral contraceptives reduce lamotrigine plasma levels

The mean steady-state plasma concentration of lamotrigine (LTG) was 13 micro mol/L in 22 women taking LTG in combination oral contraceptives (OC) compared with 28 micro mol/L among 30 women on LTG who did not take OC (p < 0.0001). The LTG dose/body weight/plasma concentration was 2.1 L/kg/day in women on OC compared with 0.8 L/kg/day in women without OC (p < 0.0001), indicating that LTG plasma levels are reduced by >50% during OC co-medication. It is advisable to monitor LTG plasma levels in conjunction with initiation or withdrawal of OC in women on LTG therapy.     

Lack of an effect of topiramate on lamotrigine serum concentrations

PURPOSE: Pharmacokinetic interactions between the older antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and topiramate (TPM) were assessed during the clinical development of this drug. Lamotrigine (LTG) has become established as an important new drug in treating a wide spectrum of seizure types, but there are no published data on whether LTG serum concentrations change when TPM is added to treatment. METHODS: Escalating doses of TPM were added to stable LTG treatment in 24 young patients (8-21 years) with epilepsy. Blood samples taken before the morning dose were collected for drug-concentration measurement in all patients before starting treatment with TPM and after stabilisation at each dose escalation. Several patients had been maintained on unchanged therapy with drug-concentration monitoring for many months before introducing TPM, and a sequence of baseline LTG serum concentrations were available on these patients. RESULTS: The mean of all baseline LTG concentrations for the group as a whole was 10.4 +/- 4.4 mg/L compared with 9.7 +/- 4.3 mg/L after addition of TPM. A comparison of last baseline LTG concentration with first test LTG concentration (i.e., after 2 weeks' TPM treatment) gave mean values of 10.7 +/- 4.7 and 10.8 +/- 4.6 mg/L, respectively. The mean LTG concentration for patients while taking their highest TPM dose was 9.5 +/- 4.3 mg/L. The analysis-of-variance modeling for the effect of TPM on LTG concentration yielded a mean LTG concentration ratio (with TPM vs. without TPM) of 94.2%, with a 90% confidence interval of 89.5-99.1%. CONCLUSIONS: TPM did not cause a significant change in LTG serum concentration in this group of patients.     

Lamotrigine-induced rash--worth a rechallenge

OBJECTIVES: The only serious adverse event associated with lamotrigine (LTG) treatment is a hypersensitivity reaction primarily presenting as a rash. Despite this concern, LTG is an antiepileptic drug (AED) with one of the most favorable efficacy/tolerability ratio compared with the new as well as the old AEDs. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the results of rechallenge with LTG after the initial rash. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 688 patients (350 as monotherapy, and 338 as add-on therapy) with either idiopathic generalized epilepsy or focal epilepsy were treated with LTG. The patients with LTG-induced rash were rechallenged to LTG. The dosage schedule was: 5 mg every day or every second day for 14 days, increased by 5 mg every 14th day to 25 mg a day. After achieving the daily dosage of 25 mg/day, the up-titration was completed following the current guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients developed a rash. The LTG-induced rash occurred in 6%, where 12 (1.8%) developed a rash shown to be coincidentally associated with the initiation of LTG therapy. In their cases LTG was continued with success without intermission. Nineteen (38%) of the initial cohort were rechallenged with LTG, with a success rate of 84%. CONCLUSION: This study is the first one to provide a successful recipe verified in time for the rechallenge with LTG after the initial drug-induced rash. Importantly, the concurrent use of valproate (VPA) was not found in this study to represent an additional risk factor for the occurrence of the rash during rechallenge with LTG. Our results agree with previous findings that women are more likely to develop the rash (P < 0.009).     

Lamotrigine High-Dose Tolerability and Safety in Patients with Epilepsy: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Eleven-Week Study

Summary: Purpose: This study was undertaken to evaluate the dose tolerability and safety of a chronic ascending twice-daily (b.i.d.) dosage regimen of 700 mg/day larnotrigine (LTG) and to include determination of the LTG pharmacokinetic profile at doses 500 mg/day in patients receiving concomitant enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods: Twelve adult male epileptic patients treated with enzyme-inducing AEDs received 700 mg/day (b.i.d.) oral LTG (n = 8) or placebo (controls, n = 4). For 3 weeks, as outpatients they had their LTG dosage increased from 100 to 400 mg/day. Then, in a clinical research study unit, patients received regimens of 500, 600, and 700 mg/day for 1 week each. Controls received matching placebo in the same sequence. At study end, dosages were tapered in 2 weeks. Follow-up evaluations were made 7 days later. Results: Five LTG patients tolerated 700 mg/day for 1 week. LTG was reduced to 600 mg/day in a patient with mild diplopia and to 500 mg/day in a patient with mild oscillopsia and diplopia. One patient discontinued 300-mg/day therapy with a moderately intense diffuse papular skin rash, attributed to LTG. Headache, drowsiness, faintness, and diplopia, the common adverse events (AEs), were mild to moderate in intensity and occurred in 50–75% of patients in both groups (except for diplopia, occurring only with LTG). Concomitant AED plasma concentrations were not markedly changed by LTG. LTG pharmacokinetics were linear over the range of 500–700 mg/day. Conclusions: LTG doses 700 mg/day can be tolerated in patients receiving concomitant enzyme-inducing AEDs.     

Lamotrigine in the adult-onset epilepsy: efficacy and long-term safety

Background: LTG is a new antiepileptic drug that is nowadays very often used in epileptic patients. Objectives: To determine efficacy and safety of Lamotrigine (LTG) in the first five years after its marketing in patients at a third level university hospital, as well as its impact on the management of classic antiepileptic drugs (AED). Patients and method: We reviewed retrospectively our Epilepsy Unit Database. One hundred patients were treated with LTG in a 5-year period. Efficacy was evaluated comparing seizure frequency in a 6-month period before and after LTG. The type of epilepsy, side effects, blood levels and concomitant treatments were considered in the analysis. Results: LTG was effective in all groups of epileptic patients studied. Eighteen percent of patients became seizure-free. Seventeen percent of patients improved more than 50%. Fifty-seven percent of patients remained treated with LTG after four years of follow-up. Side effects were mild, but frequent; only four patients discontinued LTG because of adverse effects. Serum levels were usually high, but showed no relation with clinical efficacy. The mean number of AED taken per patient increased. Conclusions: LTG is a safe an effective drug in epilepsy. It has a clear impact in the management of the epileptic patients.