Urban versus rural trauma recidivism: is there a difference?

Purpose

Understanding the characteristics of trauma recidivists may allow trauma centers to tailor prevention programs. We hypothesized that there would be an increased incidence of violent injuries and falls in the urban vs. rural recidivists, respectively.

Methods

Trauma admissions from 2000 to 2011 were queried for incidences of recidivism. Age (<65 or ≥65 years), gender, Injury Severity Score (ISS, <9 or ≥9), mortality, and injury cause (fall, violence, or other) were analyzed with univariate analyses to test for differences between urban and rural patients. Significant variables were then included in a binary logistic model and further stratified based on environment.

Results

There were a total of 19,600 trauma admissions from 2000 to 2011, representing 18,711 unique patients, with 1,690 admissions (8.6 %) attributed to 801 recidivists (4.3 %). The overall percentages of recidivist trauma admissions attributed to urban and rural patients were 8.6 and 6.9 %, respectively (p < 0.001). When adjusting for age ≥65 years as well as falls and violent injuries, patients from urban environments were at 1.12 times higher odds of being a recidivist than their rural counterparts [odds ratio (OR) 1.12; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.25; p = 0.039]. When stratified into rural and urban groups, falls and violent injuries were significant in both groups of recidivist admissions; however, age ≥65 years was only significant in rural recidivist admissions.

Conclusion

An urban trauma admission had 12 % higher odds of being attributed to a recidivist than its rural counterpart, when controlling for age and mechanism of injury (MOI). Age ≥65 years was a significant variable in rural but not urban recidivist admissions. Characterizing the recidivist may allow for targeted prevention and intervention programs to decrease repeat hospital visits.

     

Adult versus pediatric prehospital trauma care: is there a difference?

BACKGROUND: Management of the injured child in the prehospital setting continues to be debated. Issues raised in the literature include time spent on scene, skill maintenance and performance, and reported poorer outcomes compared with adults. METHODS: Retrospective 2-year review of all pediatric (n = 232) and adult (n = 3,375) patients treated by a single emergency medical services agency and transported and admitted to a Level I trauma center. Patients were divided into two groups, pediatric (age 0 to 12 years) and adult (age >12 years) and further stratified into three Injury Severity Score subgroups; 1 to 15, 16 to 25, and more than 25. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in scene time for any of the groups. The percentage of patients with intravenous access or endotracheal intubation in the field and the mean Injury Severity Score were not different for the moderate or severely injured groups, although in the minor trauma group fewer pediatric patients had intravenous access or intubation performed. There were no differences in outcome for any of the groups. CONCLUSION: Paramedics are able to provide pediatric trauma patients a level of care comparable to that provided adult patients with similar outcome.     

Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open surgery: is there an advantage?

Background

Oesophageal resection is the main method of curative treatment for cancer of the oesophagus. Despite advances in surgical technology and postoperative care, the survival rate and prognosis of people undergoing oesophagectomy is still poor. The use of minimally invasive techniques in oesophageal surgery offers hope of reduced recovery time due to a reduction in surgical trauma. Although the first reports of thoracoscopy- and laparoscopy-assisted oesophagectomy emerged some 20 years ago, there is still no consensus that the outcomes are clearly superior to outcomes following conventional open surgery. Increasingly, some surgeons promote the use of minimally invasive techniques for oesophagectomy but questions remain over its safety and efficacy compared with open surgery.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of the literature to compare minimally invasive techniques for oesophagectomy to open surgery. The outcomes of interest for efficacy and safety included mortality, operative complications, recurrence, and quality of life.

Results

There were 28 included comparative studies. No randomised controlled studies (RCTs) were available and therefore the data need to be interpreted with caution.

Conclusion

Recommendations for future research are discussed. We argue that it is difficult to conduct an RCT for this procedure due to ethical considerations and suggest ways that future nonrandomised studies could be improved.     

Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: is there a difference in outcomes?

Background  

Application of the robot for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has been slow to evolve, despite its rapid acceptance in other fields. This is largely due to associated costs of technology, reports of increased operative time, and inadequate data available to correlate the benefits of robotics to a clinical outcome. The authors present a comparative study between laparoscopic and robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass performed at a specialized institution for robotic surgery.     

Ileoanal pouch versus ileostomy: is there a difference in quality of life?

Ileoanal pouch (IAP) construction is arguably the procedure of choice to follow proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Patients with UC or FAP at our institution choose their operation after counseling with the surgeon, with an enterostomal therapist, and with patients who have undergone IAP and proctocolectomy with ileostomy (IL). We studied these patients who chose IAP and IL, to determine differences in outcome and quality of life (QOL) between those two groups. We assessed outcomes by evaluating clinic and hospital records and surveyed patients' QOL via a standardized questionnaire. During a retrospective 10-year study period, 86 patients underwent evaluation for IAP construction for UC (64) and FAP (22). Fifty-five patients underwent IAP construction, and 31 underwent IL. There were no operative deaths. Thirty-four patients sustained 69 early and late complications (40%). The IAP group experienced a higher complication rate, 53 per cent, compared with the IL group, 16 per cent. Forty-five patients (56%) have completed questionnaires. Eighty-seven per cent of IAP patients and 93 per cent of IL patients responded that their overall QOL is "always" better since their operation (P = not significant). Both groups reported very favorable responses to questions regarding work, social life, family life, sleep, and relationships without statistically significant differences between the two groups. Despite a high complication rate, IAP is an excellent operation for many patients with UC or FAP, but patients who choose IL after preoperative counseling can be expected to have similar improvement in quality of life.     

Locking versus standard screw fixation for acetabular cups: is there a difference?

Introduction

Total hip replacement has been established as a valid treatment option for displaced subcapital fractures. However, insufficient primary fixation may be the reason for early loosening in these osteoporotic patients. Primary fixation of the cup is usually achieved by press-fit fixation that can be enhanced using screws. Locking the screws into their respective cups may seem to improve the primary fixation of the construct, as locked plates proved superior fixation for osteoporotic fractures.

Methods

The study consisted of three groups: in each group, three cups were fixed into blocks of foam bone using press-fit technique. In the first group, no additional screws were used, in the second group two standard screws were inserted, while in the third group two acetabular screws were cemented into the cup to simulate locked screw fixation. Load was applied onto the rim of the acetabular component to cause shearing between the cup and the block. Cup fixation was examined by a loading machine that acquired load versus displacement. The stiffness (load vs. displacement) was calculated.

Results

Screws, either locked or non-locked, enhanced cup fixation by 26 % (p value <0.01). No significant changes were found between the locking and non-locking screws groups.

Discussion

These experimental results indicate that acetabular screws enhance primary cup fixation. This may become significant in conditions where the acetabular bone stock is suboptimal, such as when performing total hip arthroplasty after displaced subcapital fractures. However, there is no superiority for locked screws over standard screw fixation.     

Loop ileostomy closure after laparoscopic versus open surgery: is there a difference?

Background

Temporary loop ileostomy is commonly performed to protect the distal anastomosis during both open and laparoscopic colectomies. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of initial open and laparoscopic colorectal resection on the outcomes of ileostomy closure.

Methods

After institutional review board approval, all patients who underwent loop ileostomy closure from January 2008 to July 2012 were identified. The patients’ demographics, diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, type of resection, approach (laparoscopic [LS] or open [OS] surgery), use of anti-adhesion barrier, and ileostomy closure outcomes were obtained from a chart review. The outcomes of ileostomy closure after LS and OS colorectal resections were compared using Chi-square for categorical variables and Student’s t test for continuous variables.

Results

The study identified 351 patients with a mean age of 51 years: 145 patients (41.2 %) in the LS group and 206 patients (58.8 %) in the OS group. The most common procedures performed were total proctocolectomy with ileal J pouch anal anastomosis (109 patients: 49 LS, 60 OS) and restorative proctectomy (99 patients: 34 LS, 65 OS). At the time of ileostomy closure, the patients in the LS group had a significantly shorter mean operative time (LS 60.9 vs OS 82.6 min; p < 0.001) and a shorter hospital stay (LS 4.9 vs OS 5.8 days; p = 0.042). The overall complication rate was 20.1 % (70 patients), and the rate in the OS group was significantly higher (p = 0.028). The most common complications were postoperative ileus (41 patients: 13 LS vs 28 OS) and enterocutaneous fistula (5 patients, all in the OS group).

Conclusions

Loop ileostomy closure after laparoscopic colorectal surgery is associated with a significantly shorter operative time and hospital stay as well as a lower rate of postoperative complications. Superior outcomes after loop ileostomy closure lend further support to the use of laparoscopy.     

In-house trauma attendings: is there a difference?

INTRODUCTION: Outcomes of patients who met trauma activation criteria were examined before and after implementation of in-house attending call. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Outcomes for the out-of-house period (OH) (February 1, 2001 to October 31, 2002) were compared with the in-house period (IH) (November 1, 2002 to June 30, 2004). Measures included overall mortality, length of stay (LOS) in the hospital, intensive care unit (ICU) and emergency department, and preventable deaths. RESULTS: A total of 2,019 trauma activations were studied (1,036 OH, 983 IH). The groups were equivalent on admission. There was no difference in hospital LOS, ICU LOS, ventilator days, or overall mortality. Preventable deaths occurred in 8.1% of the OH group and in 1.0% of the IH group (P < .02). CONCLUSIONS: Aggregate statistics and the use of surrogate markers to determine outcomes may not accurately portray the impact of attending surgeons on the quality of care. Implementation of in-house call resulted in a decreased incidence of preventable deaths.     

Preoperative evaluation of thyroglossal duct cysts: children versus adults—is there a difference?

Background

Thyroglossal duct cysts (TGDCs) are common in children but also present in adults. This study evaluates the preoperative management and postoperative outcomes in patients with a resected TGDC.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with a surgically treated TGDC. Clinicopathologic variables and treatment outcomes were obtained by chart review.

Results

A total of 79 patients (44 pediatric and 35 adult) were identified. The majority of patients in both groups presented with a neck mass. Compared with children, adults were significantly more likely to undergo preoperative imaging and fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Malignancy was not identified in any patient on preoperative workup or postoperative pathology.

Conclusions

Adults with a TGDC are more likely to undergo preoperative imaging and biopsy. The infrequent occurrence of TGDC cancer or concurrent thyroid pathology suggests that the diagnosis of a TGDC may be made on clinical grounds in adult patients although ultrasound (±fine-needle aspiration biopsy) may be a useful supplementary modality.     

Partial versus complete fundoplication: is there a correct answer?

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common disorder, and patients diagnosed with GERD face a lifelong treatment requirement. A surgical antireflux procedure may be offered as an alternative to lifelong treatment with proton-pump inhibitors. Many investigations have been performed to help discover the best surgical alternative to medical management. An ideal antireflux procedure should be safe, effective, durable, and result in minimal complications.Total fundoplication in the form of Nissen fundoplication is the most widely used antireflux operation worldwide. Although its efficacy is well documented, the clinical success rate in terms of reflux control is occasionally compromised by troublesome mechanical side effects. Because of these unsatisfactory symptoms and continued hindered quality of life, the Nissen fundoplication has undergone many modifications. The current standard appears to be the 2 cm floppy Nissen; however, the alternative approach has been the use of a partial fundoplication, most frequently the Toupet procedure. Both the Nissen and Toupet fundoplications have proven to provide relief in the majority of patients, but each has its own drawback. Patients undergoing Nissen fundoplication have a higher incidence of dysphagia early after operation, although this appears to resolve in most. The Toupet, on the other hand, may not be as durable, and may lead to the early re-emergence of symptoms.The problem of post-Nissen dysphagia led many surgeons to believe that the Nissen night be contraindicated in patients who have dysmotility,because it would cause even greater dysphagia; however, recent articles have not demonstrated this to be the case. It seems that the floppy Nissen performed over a large bougie (56-60 Fr) with division of short gastrics and crural closure is an acceptable operation for reflux in both those who have normal motility and those who have mild to moderate dysmotility. Thus, for most patients who have GERD and normal motility, either procedure appears effective in the majority of patients; however, those patients who have severe dysmotilty disorders and who require an antireflux procedure(ie, scleroderma, postmyotomy achalasia) are likely best served with a partial fundoplication.     

Tunica vaginalis for correcting penile chordee in a rabbit model: is there a difference in flap versus graft?

PURPOSE: We compared tunica vaginalis applied as a flap versus a graft for covering defects in the ventral tunica albuginea in a rabbit model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used 18 New Zealand White rabbits in the study. The urethra was mobilized off of the corpus cavernosum. A defect was created in the ventral aspect of the tunica albuginea by excising a 1 x 0.5 cm. rectangular area. The defect was covered by the testicular surface of tunica vaginalis as a vascularized flap in 9 animals and as a graft in 9. At 2, 6 and 12-week intervals 3 animals per group were sacrificed. Transverse sections of the penis at the repair site were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and Masson's trichrome for microscopy. RESULTS: Autopsy revealed no contracture in any of the tunica vaginalis flaps. In contrast, the tunica vaginalis grafts had contracted by a mean of 22% (range 20% to 25%) at 2, 38% (range 30% to 44%) at 6 and 42% (range 38% to 48%) at 12 weeks. Microscopic examination of the tunica vaginalis flaps showed evidence of an intact blood supply and viable cremasteric muscle layer but no evidence of necrosis. Collagen remodeling and maturation was noted at 12 weeks. In tunica vaginalis grafts there was evidence of necrosis of all tunica vaginalis layers at 2 weeks with granulation tissue and active fibrosis at the periphery. At 6 and 12 weeks most necrotic tissue was replaced by fibrosis. Osseous metaplasia was identified in 1 graft at 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal use of tunica vaginalis for correction of chordee is as a flap rather than as a free graft. Grafts were associated with significant necrosis and contracture, of which neither was associated with flaps.     

Acute appendicitis: is there a difference between children and adults?

Historically, the lack of classic symptoms and delay in presentation make diagnosing acute appendicitis more difficult in children, resulting in a higher perforation rate. Despite this, the morbidity of acute appendicitis is usually lower in children. We evaluated the current differences in clinical presentation, diagnostic clues, and the outcomes of acute appendicitis between the two age groups. A retrospective review of 210 consecutive cases of pediatric appendectomy and 744 adult cases for suspected acute appendicitis from January 1995 to December 2000. Pediatric patients were defined as being 13 years and younger. Pediatric patients were similar to adult patients with respect to duration of pain before presentation (2.4 +/- 4.3 days vs 2.5 +/- 7.3 days), number of patients previously evaluated (22.0 vs 17.7%), number of imaging tests (computed tomography or ultrasound; 32.9 vs 40.2%), and number of patients observed (16.7 vs 17.2%). However, pediatric patients required less time for emergency room evaluation (4.0 +/- 2.7 hours vs 5.7 +/- 4.9 hours, P = 0.0001). In children and adults, a history of classic, migrating pain had the highest positive predictive value (94.2 vs 89.6%), followed by a white blood cell count > or =12 x 109/L (91.5 vs 84.3%). The overall negative appendectomy rate was 10.0 per cent for children and 19.0 per cent for adults (P = 0.003); the perforation rate was 19.0 per cent and 13.8 per cent, respectively (P > 0.05). The perforation rate in children was not associated with a delay in presentation (perforated cases, 2.9 +/- 3.3 days compared with nonperforated cases, 2.3 +/- 4.6 days). Mortality and morbidity, including wound infection rate and intra-abdominal abscess rate, were similar. Contrary to traditional teaching, diagnosing acute appendicitis in children is similar to that in adults. A history of migratory pain together with physical findings and leukocytosis remain accurate diagnostic clues for children and adults. Perforation rate and morbidity in children is similar to those in adults. The outcomes of acute appendicitis in children are not associated with a delay in presentation or delay in diagnosis.