Resistance to antiplatelet drugs: molecular mechanisms and laboratory detection

Summary.  The definition 'resistance to antiplatelet drugs' should be limited to situations in which failure of the drug to hit its pharmacological target has been documented by specific laboratory tests. Aspirin resistance, as determined by specific tests (e.g. serum thromboxane B₂), appears to be rare (1–2%) and, in most instances, is caused by poor compliance. In contrast to aspirin, studies that used specific tests to measure the pharmacological effect of thienopyridines [e.g. vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP)] showed a wide variability of responses to these drugs, with significant proportions of subjects (15–30%) who are very poor responders. Inter-individual differences in the extent of metabolism of thienopyridines to their active metabolites is the most plausible mechanism for the observed inter-individual variability in platelet inhibition. The demonstration that some patients may be 'resistant' or 'poor responders' to the pharmacological effect of antiplatelet drugs, has prompted the need of laboratory monitoring of antiplatelet therapy. However, many published studies have been performed using unspecific tests of platelet function, which identify patients on antiplatelet treatment with high residual platelet reactivity, which is not necessarily because of resistance to antiplatelet drugs. Despite this drawback, identification of patients with high residual platelet reactivity may be useful to predict their risk of atherothrombotic events. However, many studies still need to be carried out to identify the ideal laboratory test and to answer basic questions on its clinical utility and cost-effectiveness, before monitoring antiplatelet therapy can be recommended in the clinical practise. Until then, monitoring of antiplatelet therapy should be considered for investigational purposes only.     

Monitoring of clopidogrel action: comparison of methods

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel is a potent drug for prevention of adverse effects during and after coronary intervention. Increasing experience indicates that a significant proportion of patients do not respond adequately to clopidogrel. Because failure of antiplatelet therapy can have severe consequences, there is need for a reliable assay to quantify the effectiveness of clopidogrel treatment. METHODS: Of 24 healthy volunteers admitted to the study, 18 were treated for 1 week with clopidogrel (300-mg loading dose and 75-mg maintenance dose), and 6 with placebo. Platelet function was monitored by 2 assays, based on flow cytometry and enzyme immunoassay, that measure the phosphorylation status of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) and by aggregometry, flow cytometry of P-selectin, and the platelet function analyzer at baseline, on days 1-5, and on day 9 of treatment. RESULTS: Aggregometry and VASP phosphorylation revealed a loss of platelet response to ADP within 12 h after clopidogrel intake. The phosphorylation status of VASP correlated with the inhibition of platelet aggregation. In contrast, neither P-selectin expression nor PFA-100 closure time was a clear indicator of clopidogrel effects on platelets. CONCLUSIONS: VASP phosphorylation assays are reliable for quantifying clopidogrel effects. Because the VASP assay directly measures the function of the clopidogrel target, the P2Y12 receptor, the assay is selective for clopidogrel effects rather than effects of other platelet inhibitors commonly in use.     

The future of platelet function testing to guide therapy in clopidogrel low and enhanced responders

Dual oral antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is the therapy of choice in patients with acute coronary syndromes and in patients undergoing coronary stent placement to lower the risk of thrombotic events. Responsiveness to aspirin and especially to clopidogrel is not uniform and is subject to considerable interindividual variability. Furthermore, there is a broad consensus that clopidogrel low response or so-called high on-treatment platelet reactivity is linked to the occurrence of ischemic events. On the other hand, evidence is accumulating that enhanced clopidogrel responders are at increased risk of bleeding. Newer antiplatelet drugs, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, are more potent and produce more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation via the P2Y(12) ADP platelet receptor. A variety of methods of platelet function testing are available for evaluating platelet inhibition in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated patients in order to help determine the individual risk for ischemic and bleeding complications. Although not yet routinely undertaken, platelet function testing offers the potential to tailor antiplatelet therapy for individual patients. Whether alteration of therapy based on platelet function testing improves patients' outcomes remains unclear and is currently under investigation. This article reviews the impact of antiplatelet drug responsiveness on clinical outcomes with a focus on P2Y(12) receptor inhibition as well as on current and future concepts for personalized antiplatelet strategies.     

Flow cytometric analysis of intraplatelet VASP phosphorylation for the detection of clopidogrel resistance in patients with ischemic cardiovascular diseases

Interindividual variability of the inhibitory effect of clopidogrel on platelet functions leading to clopidogrel resistance has been described in some patients with ischemic cardiovascular disease. A reliable laboratory test is therefore needed to identify patients insufficiently protected by this antiplatelet treatment. The phosphorylation of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), an intraplatelet actin regulatory protein, is dependent on the level of activation of the platelet P2Y12 receptor, which is targeted by clopidogrel. The aim of this study was to use a flow cytometric VASP phosphorylation assay to evaluate the efficacy of clopidogrel therapy. The platelet reactivity index (PRI), expressed as a percentage, is the difference in VASP fluorescence intensity between resting (+PGE1) and activated (+ADP) platelets. In vitro, the PRI was strongly correlated with the inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by specific blockade of the P2Y12 receptor by the competitive antagonist AR-C69931MX (R = 0.72, P < 0.0001). Ex vivo, the PRI was 78.3 +/- 4.6% in 47 healthy donors, 79.0 +/- 4.1% in 34 patients not receiving clopidogrel and 61.1 +/- 17.0% in 33 patients treated with clopidogrel (P < 0.0001). In the clopidogrel group, the PRI values were widely dispersed (from 6.6 to 85.8%) and more than 30% of these patients had a PRI equivalent of values in patients not receiving clopidogrel. The flow cytometric analysis of VASP phosphorylation seems to be a suitable test to evaluate the efficacy of clopidogrel treatment. This assay demonstrated a wide interindividual variability of the inhibitory response of platelets to clopidogrel and showed that one-third of the patients treated appeared to be 'unprotected' by this therapy.     

Personalized antiplatelet therapy for coronary artery disease patients: is this the future?

Clopidogrel has decreased the rate of thrombotic events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, two major limitations of the drug have been involved in the persistence of a relatively high rate of adverse events. The recent literature suggested that improved platelet reactivity inhibition using a higher or tailored dose of clopidogrel, or a more potent agent, could reduce the rate of events. The development of new antiplatelet agents and the increasing availability of platelet assays are likely to profoundly modify current practice and favor personalized antiplatelet therapy.     

Dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus: special considerations

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with higher rates of ischemic events in patients suffering from an acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, thereby underscoring the need to develop more effective and specific strategies toward mitigation of the cardiovascular burden associated with DM. Platelet hyper-reactivity associated with DM is a central contributor to this high risk, since platelets are the key players in the processes underpinning atherothrombotic complications, thereby representing a specific therapeutic target. Oral dual antiplatelet therapy comprising the combination of aspirin (75–100 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg) has been, for years, the standard antithrombotic treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, despite the use of this therapy, high rates of cardiovascular events continue to occur, especially within the cohort of patients with DM. These observations could be in part explained by an inadequate clopidogrel-induced platelet inhibition, which has been associated with impaired clinical outcomes. In particular, DM is associated with a higher prevalence of reduced responsiveness to standard dual antiplatelet therapy, which may contribute to the higher rates of ischemic events seen in this population. These findings have prompted the identification of alternative dual antiplatelet treatment regimens to optimize platelet inhibition. The present review aims to describe benefits and limitations of oral dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (75 mg) and to appraise the evidence regarding alternative oral dual antiplatelet therapy regimens, which include higher doses of aspirin and clopidogrel or the combination of prasugrel or ticagrelor with aspirin, focusing on patients with DM.     

New Antiplatelet Agents and the Role of Platelet Function Testing in Acute Coronary Syndromes

Background

Dual antiplatelet therapy is a guideline mandated for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Despite its use, thrombotic events continue to occur both early and late. Platelet function testing has been used to define the in vitro effects of new antiplatelet agents, and it has been suggested that it be used to choose therapy. The role of platelet function testing, particularly with newer antiplatelet agents, remains unclear.

Objective

We review the rationale for platelet function testing and its application in monitoring patients on antiplatelet therapy. We also review recent clinical trials of newer antiplatelet agents. On the basis of this review, we reach conclusions on the current role of antiplatelet function testing in monitoring modern antiplatelet therapy and the role of the new antiplatelet agents in the treatment of ACS.

Methods

We reviewed recent publications on platelet function testing and clinical trials of newer antiplatelet therapies compared with clopidogrel.

Results

Platelet function testing is complex, but there is now a bedside test, VerifyNow. High platelet reactivity has been associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Recent clinical trials have not found any advantage in outcomes in patients who have their therapy adjusted by monitoring their platelet function. Newer agents, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and cangrelor, produce more rapid, complete, less variable effects on platelet function than clopidogrel. Prasugrel was found to improve outcomes compared with clopidogrel in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous intervention. Ticagrelor is beneficial in all patients with ACS and reduces cardiovascular mortality compared with clopidogrel. Cangrelor improves outcomes in patients undergoing stenting. Recent studies to assess the role of platelet function monitoring of the effects of clopidogrel and modifying treatments have not been successful.

Conclusion

Recent clinical trials have indicated that newer antiplatelet agents have advantages over clopidogrel in the treatment of ACS. Platelet function testing gives us a guide to the timing, efficacy, and variability of therapy and can correlate with poor patient outcomes; however, the use of antiplatelet function testing to tailor therapy does not seem appropriate.     

Platelet reactivity tests for assessing antiplatelet drug response: what the clinician needs to know

Antiplatelet therapy is a cornerstone in the treatment of cardiovascular disease to prevent ischemic events. Various tests have become clinically available to measure platelet function after antiplatelet treatment. A wide interpatient variability in the magnitude of platelet inhibition has been demonstrated in numerous studies, especially in response to clopidogrel. Several reasons including clinical, pharmacological and genetic factors have been identified. High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity has been linked to adverse clinical outcome, in particular to stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary interventions. New antiplatelet drugs including prasugrel and ticagrelor have been advocated to overcome the limitations of clopidogrel. Several studies addressed the concept of tailored antiplatelet treatment according to the results of platelet function testing. Within this review, we summarize the current status of personalized antiplatelet therapy for cardiovascular disease.     

Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation analysis prior to percutaneous coronary intervention for exclusion of postprocedural major adverse cardiovascular events

BACKGROUND: Despite dual antiplatelet therapy, the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary angioplasty remains high. Studies have shown interindividual variations in response to clopidogrel. Furthermore, there is an apparent link between clinical outcomes and clopidogrel resistance. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the value of platelet reactivity index (PRI), assessed by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation analysis, for predicting MACE after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation. METHODS: A prospective monocentric study was performed on 144 patients undergoing PCI. PR was evaluated by VASP phosphorylation analysis 24 h after they received a 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel. MACE were recorded during a 6-month follow-up. Patients were divided into quintiles according to PRI, as assessed by VASP analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve served to determine the optimal cut-off value of VASP analysis to detect MACE. RESULTS: Of the 144 patients, 34% had stable angina pectoris, 40% silent ischemia, and 26% low-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. During the follow-up, 21 MACE were observed. Patients in quintile 1 of VASP analysis had a significantly lower risk of MACE as compared with those among the four higher quintiles (0 vs. 21, P < 0.01). ROC curve analysis of VASP showed an optimal cut-off value of 50% PR to exclude MACE. The negative predictive value of the test was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: VASP phosphorylation analysis can evaluate the individual response to clopidogrel loading dose prior to PCI and predict postprocedural MACE.     

Platelet function tests for monitoring of acetylsalicylic acid: clinical significance in antiplatelet treatment

Several studies have demonstrated with the use platelet function tests (PFT) that subgroups of patients under acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) fail to produce the anticipated antiplatelet effect. This phenomenon as well as the clinical failure of ASA to protect patients from thromboembolic complications has been termed ASA resistance (AR) or ASA nonresponsiveness. Several subtypes of AR can be distinguished by PFT. The following PFT were used to characterize AR: optical aggregometry, platelet aggregation in whole blood, platelet function analyzer (PFA-100), platelet reactivity test or platelet aggregate ratio, flow cytometry and thromboxane B(2) generation. All PFT have in common that their widespread clinical use is substantially limited due to complex preanalytic factors, reduced specificity and poor reproducibility. PFT are not interchangeable for monitoring antiplatelet treatment. Three prospective clinical trials revealed a possible relationship between AR and subsequent cardiovascular events. There is a need for a simple and reliable assay for predicting the clinical efficacy of antiplatelet therapy. Recent data demonstrate that none of the currently available assays including the PFA-100 system are capable to accomplish these objectives.     

Role of Platelet Transfusion in the Reversal of Anti-Platelet Therapy

Antiplatelet therapy is extensively used in the primary and secondary prophylaxis of arterial thrombotic disorders. Aspirin, the most commonly used antiplatelet agent, is a cyclooxygenase−1 inhibitor and considered a mild to moderate inhibitor of platelet function. Therefore, often a second antiplatelet agent is necessary in certain clinical conditions requiring greater inhibition of platelet function. An adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor, P2Y12, is an important target for this purpose; several agents inhibit this receptor providing potent antiplatelet effect. One of the side effects of these agents is bleeding, which in some patients may require reversal of antiplatelet effect. Similarly, patients undergoing emergent surgeries may benefit from reversal of antiplatelet effect to avoid excessive surgical bleeding. This article reviews current literature on this topic.     

三联抗血小板药物对非ST段抬高性急性冠脉综合征患者血清炎症因子及内皮功能的影响

目的探讨短期三联抗血小板药物对非ST段抬高性急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者血清炎症因子和血管内皮功能的影响,为三联抗血小板药物治疗非ST段抬高性ACS提供进一步的临床依据。方法急性非ST段抬高性ACS患者82例,随机分为三联抗血小板药物治疗组(治疗组)和二联抗血小板治疗组(对照组);观察组患者给予阿司匹林、氯吡格雷、替罗非班三联抗血小板药物;对照组患者给予阿司匹林,氯吡格雷二联抗血小板药物。观察治疗48 h后患者血清炎症因子(hs-CRP、IL-6)及反映血管内皮功能的指标(ET-1、NO、PGI2)的水平变化情况。结果三联抗血小板药物较二联抗血小板药物更有效地降低非ST段抬高性ACS患者血清炎症因子及改善血管内皮功能,主要的不良反应为皮下瘀斑、牙龈出血。结论对于非ST段抬高性ACS患者,三联抗血小板药物在短期的抗炎、改善血管功能方面要优于二联抗血小板治疗,值得临床推广应用。     

The Residual Platelet Aggregation after Deployment of Intracoronary Stent (PREDICT) score.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest a high interindividual variability of response to clopidogrel associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome. Different clinical factors are considered to influence a persistent residual platelet aggregation (RPA) despite conventional antiplatelet therapy. OBJECTIVES: To investigate clinical factors that affect RPA after 600-mg clopidogrel loading in a large unselected cohort of patients with symptomatic CAD. METHODS: The study population included a consecutive cohort of 1,092 patients treated with coronary stenting for stable angina and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Residual platelet activity was assessed by ADP (20 micromol L(-1))-induced platelet aggregation >or= 6 h after LD. Eleven clinical factors were included in the primary analysis. RESULTS: In multivariate regression analysis increased RPA was significantly influenced by ACS, reduced LV-function, diabetes mellitus, renal failure (creatinine > 1.5 mg dL(-1)), and age > 65 years. In a factor-weighed model the risk for high RPA increased with higher score levels (OR for patients with a score of 1-3, 1.21, 95% CI 0.7-2.1; score 4-6, OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.17-3.5; P = 0.01; score 7-9, OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.8-6.0). During a 30-day follow-up the incidence of major adverse events was higher in patients with RPA in the upper tertile (4.8% vs. 2.5% in the 2nd and 1.5% in the 1st tertile; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The PREDICT score provides a good tool to estimate residual platelet activity after clopidogrel LD by easily available patient details. Additionally, we demonstrate its association with short-term outcome. Thus, patients with a high score may benefit from intensified antiplatelet therapy by improved platelet inhibition and risk reduction for thromboischemic events.     

Platelet aggregation and clot formation in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest treated with induced hypothermia and dual platelet inhibition with aspirin and ticagrelor; a prospective observational study

Introduction

We conducted a prospective observational study in cardiac arrest survivors treated with mild induced hypothermia, evaluating different platelet function tests at hypo- and normothermia. We also investigated the relation between gastric emptying and vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP).

Methods

Comatose survivors of out of hospital cardiac arrest were included and divided into two groups, depending on whether dual platelet inhibition with peroral ticagrelor and aspirin was given or not. The first blood samples (T1) were collected 12–24 hours after reaching target temperature (33°C) and were compared to blood samples collected 12–28 hours after reaching normothermia (37°C) (T2) within each group. All samples were analysed by Sonoclot viscoelasticity, flow cytometry based VASP and with multiple electrode aggregometry, Multiplate®; adenosine diphosphate (ADP), collagen (COL), thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP) and arachidonic acid (ASPI). Sonoclot and Multiplate® instruments were set on in vivo temperatures. Gastric secretion from the nasogastric tube was measured to assess absorption of per orally administered antiplatelet drugs. Differences between T1 and T2 within each group were calculated using Wilcoxon matched pairs signed test. Significance levels were set at P <0.01.

Results

In total, 23 patients were included. In patients with dual platelet inhibition (n =14) Multiplate®-analyses showed no changes in ADP stimulated platelets. COL, TRAP and ASPI aggregations were higher at T2 compared to T1. Sonoclot-analyses showed that activated clotting time (ACT) was unchanged but both clot rate (CR) and platelet function (PF) were higher at T2 compared to T1. VASP decreased from 53 ± 28(T1) to 24 ± 22(T2), (P <0.001). The average volume of gastric secretion aspirated before T1 correlated well with VASP (T1), r =0.81 (P <0.001). In patients with no platelet inhibition, (n =9) similar changes between T1 and T2 were seen as in patients with dual platelet inhibition while VASP was unchanged.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated increased platelet aggregation and strengthened clot formation over time in out of hospital cardiac arrest patients treated with hypothermia. In patients on oral dual platelet inhibition, the effect of ticagrelor was delayed, probably due to slow gastric emptying.     

Adenosine diphosphate-inducible platelet reactivity shows a pronounced age dependency in the initial phase of antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel

Summary.  Background:  Until recently, there were hardly any data on the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in advanced age. Like other metabolic processes, the conversion of clopidogrel to its active metabolite may be impaired in older patients, leading to high on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity. Objective:  To investigate the age dependency of clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition. Patients and methods:  This was a prospective observational study. We determined adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP)-inducible platelet reactivity using light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay in 191 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy after angioplasty and stenting for cardiovascular disease. Results:  ADP-inducible platelet reactivity increased linearly with age after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, type of intervention, medication, C-reactive protein (CRP) and renal function [using LTA 0.36% of maximal aggregation per year, 95% CI 0.08–0.64%, P  = 0.013; using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay 3.2 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) per year, 95% CI 1.98–4.41 PRU, P  < 0.001]. ADP-inducible platelet reactivity was significantly higher in patients aged 75 years or older compared with younger patients ( P  = 0.003 for LTA and P  < 0.001 for the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay). Further, high on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity was significantly more common among patients aged 75 years or older ( P  = 0.02 for LTA and P  < 0.001 for the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay). Conclusion:  ADP-inducible platelet reactivity shows a pronounced age dependency in the initial phase of antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel. The clinical implications of these findings need to be addressed in future trials.     

Assessing post-treatment platelet reactivity: a focus on patient selection and setting

Dual antiplatelet therapy is critical to inhibit platelet reactivity in order to prevent ischemic reccurences in stented patients. However, studies have observed a variable blockade of the P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor between patients following clopidogrel intake. This interindividual variability in the biological response is not uncommon with clopidogrel (about 50%) and even prasugrel (20%). High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is correlated with thrombotic events following percutaneous coronary intervention. Several studies suggested that tailoring of antiplatelet therapy based on platelet reactivity (PR) monitoring could safely reduce the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events in HTPR patients. In addition, low on-treatment PR was recently associated with bleeding events both in patients treated with prasugrel and clopidogrel. Of importance, bleedings are associated with a poor prognosis in stented patients. Overall, the potential of PR monitoring to individualize antiplatelet therapy might benefit stented patients by reducing both ischemic and bleeding risks. However, such strategies remain to be evaluated in adequately designed large-scale randomized clinical trials.     

Elinogrel, an orally and intravenously available ADP-receptor antagonist. How does elinogrel affect a personalized antiplatelet therapy?

The antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and the ADP-receptor blocker clopidogrel is currently the standard medication after coronary intervention or after acute coronary syndrome to prevent recurrent ischemic events and reduce mortality. However, high interindividual response variability to antiplatelet treatment is described in up to 44% of treated patients. A poor response to clopidogrel is caused by multifactorial mechanisms. Individual risk assessment including platelet function testing (PFT) can help to identify high risk patients, although recent randomized trials to investigate effects of PFT-guided therapy have failed to detect an impact on prognostic outcome. Poor response to standard antiplatelet agents can be overcome by switching to alternate substances. Elinogrel is a novel competitive, reversible ADP-receptor antagonist available in oral and intravenous formulation. Additional treatment with elinogrel showed advantages over clopidogrel, including more rapid, less variable, and more complete inhibition of platelet function without significantly increased bleeding complications. This review gives an overview over the investigational drug elinogrel for use in a personalized antiplatelet approach.     

抗血小板治疗实验室监测之我见

抗血小板药物在各种动脉血栓性疾病防治中具有重要地位。虽然目前抗血小板药物多采用固定剂量给药,但不同患者对抗血小板治疗的反应性存在明显差异。治疗后的血小板高反应性或低反应性可能与血栓事件或出血事件风险相关。基于血小板功能检测的个体化抗血小板治疗方案可能有助于预防血栓或出血不良事件的发生,但目前仍缺乏上述治疗策略能够最终改善患者预后的确切临床证据。迄今为止,对于接受抗血小板治疗的患者是否应常规进行实验室监测仍存在诸多争议。本文对抗血小板治疗反应多样性的成因及血小板功能检测是否可用于指导个体化抗血小板治疗进行讨论。     

Antiplatelet function variability in clopidogrel-treated patients: need for new antiplatelet agents

Antiplatelet therapy is obligatory in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) both in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and in secondary prevention. Aspirin in combination with clopidogrel has been recommended as the main therapeutic regimen for many years. However, the high inter-individual variability of platelet aggregation seen with clopidogrel, caused by the underlying disease (more pronounced in diabetic patients and patients with ACS), drug interactions as well as by genetic variants leading to a reduced formation of the active metabolite of the prodrug clopidogrel, has confronted clinical practice with increasing numbers of adverse clinical events in patients following an ACS. Therefore, new antiplatelet agents have been investigated showing a more favorable efficacy/safety profile. Prasugrel as well as ticagrelor are meanwhile part of the recently published revascularization guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology based on their favorable results with respect to reducing a combined ischemic efficacy endpoint in patients with ACS in the TRITON-TIMI-38 (prasugrel) and PLATO (ticagrelor) trials. Different to clopidogrel, their effects are independent of genetic variants and also drug interactions seem neglectable. This article discusses the reasons for antiplatelet function variability of clopidogrel and presents clinical data of the new ADP-receptor inhibitors by reviewing the recently published trials and prespecified post hoc analyses of these trials as well as the potential use of the new antiplatelet agents in the near future.     

Modern antiplatelet agents in coronary artery disease

Dual antiplatelet therapy is well recognized in the prevention of thrombotic complications of acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary interventions. Despite clinical benefits of aspirin and clopidogrel therapy, a number of limitations curtail their efficacy: slow onset of action, variability in platelet inhibitory response and potential drug–drug interactions. Furthermore, the single platelet-activation pathway targeted by these agents allows continued platelet activation via other pathways, ensuring incomplete protection against ischemic events, thus, underscoring the need for alternate antiplatelet treatment strategies. A number of novel antiplatelet agents are currently in advance development and many have established superior effects on platelet inhibition, clinical outcomes and safety profile than clopidogrel in high-risk patients. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current status of P2Y12 receptor inhibition and PAR-1 antagonists in determining a future strategy for individualized antiplatelet therapy.