Selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Evidence for involvement of perinodal myocardium within the reentrant circuit.

BACKGROUND. The circuit of atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia may include perinodal atrial myocardium. Furthermore, in patients with dual AV nodal pathways, the atrial insertion of the slow pathway is likely to be located near the ostium of the coronary sinus, caudal to the expected location of the AV node. The present study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of selective catheter ablation of the slow pathway using radiofrequency energy applied along the tricuspid annulus near the coronary sinus ostium as definitive therapy for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS. Among 34 consecutive patients who were prospectively enrolled in the study, the slow pathway was selectively ablated in 30, and the fast pathway was ablated in four. Antegrade conduction over the fast pathway remained intact in all 30 patients after successful selective slow pathway ablation. There was no statistically significant change in the atrio-His interval (68.5 +/- 21.8 msec before and 69.6 +/- 23.9 msec after ablation) or AV Wenckebach rate (167 +/- 27 beats per minute before and 178 +/- 50 beats per minute after ablation) after selective ablation of the slow pathway. However, the antegrade effective refractory period of the fast pathway decreased from 348 +/- 94 msec before ablation to 309 +/- 79 msec after selective slow pathway ablation (p = 0.005). Retrograde conduction remained intact in 26 of 30 patients after selective ablation of the slow pathway. The retrograde refractory period of the ventriculo-atrial conduction system was 285 +/- 55 msec before and 280 +/- 52 msec after slow pathway ablation in patients with intact retrograde conduction (p = NS). There were three complications in two patients, including an episode of pulmonary edema and the development of spontaneous AV Wenckebach block during sleep in one patient after slow pathway ablation and the late development of complete AV block in another patient after fast pathway ablation. Over a mean follow-up period of 322 +/- 73 days, AV nodal reentrant tachycardia recurred in three patients, all of whom were successfully treated in a second ablation session. CONCLUSIONS. Radiofrequency ablation of the slow AV pathway is highly effective and is associated with a low rate of complications.     

The radiofrequency catheter ablation of intranodal reentry tachycardia in children and adolescents]

INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow pathway is the primary nonpharmacological treatment for the atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia at present. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results and long term follow-up of the catheter and radiofrequency modification of the AV node in the treatment of the atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia in children and adolescents in our center. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a series of fifteen patients, 7 men and 8 women, with a mean age of 8.7 +/- 5.5 years (range, from 4 to 18) with atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation. Six patients had been treated previously with 1.4 +/- 1.1 antiarrhythmic drugs and nine had not received treatment. In all patients slow-pathway atrioventricular node ablation guided by an anatomic stepwise approach was attempted. In 14 out of 15 patients slow pathway was successfully ablated; and in one patient with a previously failed slow-pathway ablation, a fast-pathway ablation was performed. Tachycardia recurred in one patient, and slow pathway was ablated in a second procedure. After successful slow pathway ablation in 14 patients, the shortest cycle length in which the AV conduction was maintained at 1:1, was increased from 271.3 +/- 22.6 to 316.7 +/- 30.1 ms (p < 0.001), while the AH and HV intervals and shortest cycle length of 1:1 VA conduction remained unchanged. In the patient who had fast pathway ablation the AH interval was increased from 65 to 130 ms, and retrograde VA conduction was lost. Noninducibility of the tachycardia was achieved in all patients without significant complications. During a mean follow-up of 18.8 +/- 11.4 months (median of 16), all patients are symptom-free without medication. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency catheter ablation is a successful and safe therapeutic alternative in the treatment of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia in children and adolescents.     

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children: effect of slow pathway ablation on fast pathway function

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies in adults have shown significant shortening of the fast pathway effective refractory period after successful slow pathway ablation. As differences between adults and children exist in other characteristics of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), we sought to characterize the effect of slow pathway ablation or modification in a multicenter study of pediatric patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from procedures in pediatric patients were gathered retrospectively from five institutions. Entry criteria were age <21 years, typical AVNRT inducible with/without isoproterenol infusion, and attempted slow pathway ablation or modification. Dual AV nodal pathways were defined as those with > or =50 msec jump in A2-H2 with a 10-msec decrease in A1-A2. Successful ablation was defined as elimination of AVNRT inducibility. A total of 159 patients (age 4.4 to 21 years, mean 13.1) were studied and had attempted slow pathway ablation. AVNRT was inducible in the baseline state in 74 (47%) of 159 patients and with isoproterenol in the remainder. Dual AV nodal pathways were noted in 98 (62%) of 159 patients in the baseline state. Ablation was successful in 154 (97%) of 159 patients. In patients with dual AV nodal pathways and successful slow pathway ablation, the mean fast pathway effective refractory period was 343+/-68 msec before ablation and 263+/-64 msec after ablation. Mean decrease in the fast pathway effective refractory period was 81+/-82 msec (P < 0.0001) and was not explained by changes in autonomic tone, as measured by changes in sinus cycle length during the ablation procedure. Electrophysiologic measurements were correlated with age. Fast pathway effective refractory period was related to age both before (P = 0.0044) and after ablation (P < 0.0001). AV block cycle length was related to age both before (P = 0.0005) and after ablation (P < 0.0001). However, in dual AV nodal pathway patients, the magnitude of change in the fast pathway effective refractory period after ablation was not related to age. CONCLUSION: Lack of clear dual AV node physiology is common in pediatric patients with inducible AVNRT (38%). Fast pathway effective refractory period shortens substantially in response to slow pathway ablation. The magnitude of change is large compared with adult reports and is not completely explained by changes in autonomic tone. Prospective studies in children using autonomic blockade are needed.     

Adenosine in the noninvasive diagnosis of dual AV nodal conduction: use as a follow-up parameter after slow pathway ablation in AVNRT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate if administration of adenosine during sinus rhythm to patients with PSVT of unknown mechanism is capable to detect dual AV nodal conduction and furthermore to evaluate this diagnostic parameter as a controlling test after slow pathway ablation in AVNRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Before electrophysiological study 35 consecutive patients with PSVT were given adenosine during sinus rhythm. After radiofrequency ablation the adenosine test was repeated in a subset of 19 patients. The electrophysiological study revealed 19 patients (54%) with typical AVNRT (study group), 10 (29%) with atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT), 4 (11%) with ectopic atrial tachycardia (EAT) and 2 patients (6%) with inducible atrial flutter (AF) (control group). We observed a sudden increment of the PQ interval of more than 50 msec between two consecutive beats in 15 of 19 patients (79%) in the study group (75+/-35 msec) and in 2 patients (1 with EAT, AF) of the control group (19+/-12 msec) (p<0.001). After slow pathway radiofrequency ablation the sudden increment of PQ interval persisted in 4 of 12 patients (33%) of the study group. Three of these 4 patients had a relapse of AVNRT during a follow-up of 3 months. CONCLUSION: The administration of adenosine during sinus rhythm is an excellent noninvasive diagnostic test for identifying dual AV nodal conduction and additionally for verifying radiofrequency ablation results in patients with AVNRT.     

从慢径消融发生的交界区心律试探房室结双径的本质

７６例慢－快型房室结折返性心动过速（ＡＶＮＲＴ）患者接受房室结慢径消融术。６５例慢径阻断、９例双径存在但ＡＶＮＲＴ不能诱发、２例快径阻断。慢径阻断后，除快径的前传有效不应期（ＥＲＰ）缩短（２８７．０±７９．０ｍｓｖｓ３４４．０±８７．０ｍｓ，Ｐ＜０．０１）外，房室传导的文氏点、２１阻滞点、室房传导的１１点、快径逆传ＥＲＰ、前传和逆传功能不应期均无明显改变。共放电８４１次，其中无交界区心律的３１７次放电，无一次消融成功。６５例慢径阻断者，交界区心律减少或消失。以上结果提示快径和慢径可能是两条各具电生理特性的传导纤维。     

Transcatheter modification of the atrioventricular node using radiofrequency energy.

120 consecutive patients with symptomatic atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) underwent catheter ablation using radiofrequency energy. Fast pathway ablation was attempted in the first 16 consecutive patients by application of radiofrequency current in the anterior and superior aspect of the tricuspid annulus. Successful results were accomplished in 13 patients, complete AV block occurred in three. The other 104 patients initially underwent ablation of the slow pathway in the posterior and inferior aspects of the tricuspid annulus which was successful in 98 patients. The remaining six patients subsequently underwent a fast pathway ablation with successful results in four and AV block in two. Therefore, 102 (98%) of the last 104 patients became free of AVNRT while maintaining intact AV conduction. This study demonstrates that both AV nodal conduction pathways can be selectively ablated. However, slow pathway ablation seems safer and should be considered as the first approach.     

Target Temperatures of 48°C versus 60°C During Slow Pathway Ablation:

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between temperature at the electrode-tissue interface and the loss of AV and ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction is not established, and the optimal target temperature for the slow pathway approach to radiofrequency ablation of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare target temperatures of 48 degrees C and 60 degrees C during the slow pathway approach to ablation of AVNRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 138 patients undergoing ablation for AVNRT. Patients undergoing slow pathway ablation using closed-loop temperature monitoring were randomly assigned to a target temperature of either 48 degrees C or 60 degrees C. The primary success rates were 76% in the patients assigned to 48 degrees C and 100% in the patients assigned to 60 degrees C (P < 0.01). The ablation procedure duration (33 +/- 31 min vs 26 +/- 28 min; P = 0.2), fluoroscopic time (25 +/- 15 min vs 24 +/- 16 min; P = 0.5), and mean number of applications (9.3 +/- 6.5 vs 7.8 +/- 8.1; P = 0.3) were similar in patients assigned to 48 degrees and 60 degrees C, respectively. The mean temperature (46.1 degrees +/- 24.8 degrees C vs 48.7 +/- 3.2 degrees C; P < 0.01), the temperature associated with junctional ectopy (48.1 degrees +/- 2.0 degrees C vs 53.5 degrees +/- 3.5 degrees C, P < 0.0001), and the frequency of VA block during junctional ectopy (24.6% vs 37.2%; P < 0.0001) were less in the patients assigned to 48 degrees C compared to 60 degrees C. The frequency of transient or permanent AV block was similar in each group (2.8% vs 3.6%; P = 0.2). In the 60 degrees C group, only 12% of applications achieved an electrode temperature of 60 degrees C. During follow-up of 9.9 +/- 4.2 months, there was one recurrence of AVNRT in the 48 degrees C group and none in the 60 degrees C group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to 48 degrees C, a target temperature of 60 degrees C during radiofrequency slow pathway ablation is associated with a higher primary success rate and a higher incidence of VA block during junctional ectopy induced by the radiofrequency energy. AV block is not more common with the higher target temperature, but only if VA conduction is aggressively monitored during applications of radiofrequency energy.     

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of AtypicalAtrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Ablation of Atypical Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia, Introduction: Published reports of radiofrequency ablation of atypical atrioventricular nodal reentranttacbycardia (AVNRT) have been limited. We present our experience in 10 consecutive patientswith atypical AVNRT wbo underwent radiofrequency ablation of the "slow" AV nodal pathway.
Methods and Resttlts: there were 9 females and 1 male; their mean age was 44 ± 19 years (± SD), the mean AVNRT cycle length and ventriculoatrial (VA) interval at the His positionduring AVNRT were 340 ± 50 msec and 200 ± 70 msec, respectively. the slow pathway wassuccessfully ablated in all patients with a mean of 10 ± 7 radiofrequency energy applications inthe posteroseptal right atritim near the coronary sinus os. The mean procedure duration was 100 ± 35 minutes. There were no complications. In 4 patients, target sites were identified during sinus rhythm by mapping for possible slow pathway potentials, In the other 6 patients, target sites were identified by mapping retrograde atrial activation during AVNRT or ventricularpacing, The VA times at successful target sites were a mean of 45 ± 30 msec less tban the VAtime at the His cathetcr during AVNRT, There were no differences in success rate, number ofradiofrequency energy applications, or procedure duration between patients in whom mappingwas guided by possible slow pathway potentials or by retrograde atrial activation, During 6 ± 3 months of followup, 1 patient bad a recurrence of atypical AVNRT and underwent a secondablation procedure, which was successful.
Conclusion: Radiofrequency ablation of atypical AVNRT can be safely and effectivelyaccomplisbed when target sites are identified based either on possible slow pathway potentialsduring sinus rbytbm or retrograde atrial activation times during tachycardia.     

Characteristics of slow pathway conduction after successful AVNRT ablation

Background: AV node slow pathway conduction can persist following successful ablation for AV node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). We hypothesized that careful examination of AV nodal conduction curves before and after effective AVNRT ablation in patients with persistent slow pathway conduction could shed light on this apparent paradox.
Methods and Results: Thirty patients (age 40.9 ± 14.3; 8 male) were included. AV node function curves were created based on pre- and postablation atrial extrastimulus testing. Analysis of slow pathway function curves demonstrated significant decrease in AH for any given coupling interval after ablation (mean difference –68.1 [–94.5, –41.7] P < 0.001), graphically indicated by downward displacement of the curve. In addition, mean slow pathway effective refractory period (ERP) increased from 247.9 ± 36.1 msec to 288.6 ± 56.0 msec (P < 0.001); mean maximum AH interval decreased from 361.3 ± 114.2 msec to 306.9 ± 65.2 msec (P = 0.013 ) ; mean difference in minimum and maximum AH interval during slow pathway conduction decreased (from 94.5 ± 75.8 msec to 59.6 ± 46.2 msec (P = 0.016 ). Finally, mean difference between the fast and slow pathway effective refractory periods, the span of coupling intervals over which slow pathway conduction occurred, decreased (from 113.9 ± 61.4 msec to 63.2 ± 41.5 msec, P = 0.001).
Conclusions: Ablation, which successfully eliminates inducible and spontaneous AVNRT in the presence of persistent slow pathway conduction, is associated with significantly altered slow pathway conduction characteristics, indicating the presence of a damaged or different slow pathway after ablation, incapable of sustaining tachycardia.     

快径间断逆传是房室结折返性心动过速的少见电生理表现

报道 4例房室结折返性心动过速 (AVNRT)的少见电生理表现———快径间断逆传。 4例经心电图和食管电生理检查证实为AVNRT的病人 ,心内电生理检查中心室刺激无快径逆传 ,遂静脉注射异丙肾上腺素和消融阻断慢径后观察室房 (VA)传导特点。结果 :4例病人基础电生理检查均无快径逆传。静脉注射异丙肾上腺素后心室刺激 ,3例显示快径逆传并诱发AVNRT ,1例仍不显示快径逆传。消融阻断慢径后 ,4例病人均显示良好的快径逆传。结论 :快径间断逆传是AVNRT的少见电生理特点 ,慢径和快径相互干扰是其产生的重要机制之一。     

Arrhythmia recurrences are rare when the site of radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway is medial or anterior to the coronary sinus os.

AIMS: The site of successful ablation of the slow atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathway may be located in the posteroseptal or midseptal area. We have previously shown that the site of successful radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the slow pathway, rather than residual slow pathway conduction correlates with AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) recurrences, with more recurrences noted in inferoposterior (to the coronary sinus os) locations. Accordingly, we have since modified our approach, and in a consecutive series of 105 patients we have performed slow pathway RF ablation exclusively at medial or anterior locations, with the objective of prospectively examining the recurrence rate of AVNRT incurred with this approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 40 men and 65 women, aged 42 +/- 18 years, having RF ablation for symptomatic AVNRT exclusively in anterior to the coronary sinus os locations. A combined anatomical and electrophysiological approach to slow pathway ablation was employed. This series of patients was compared with the previous series of 55 patients (historical group) with AVNRT undergoing RF ablation at both inferoposterior and anteromedial locations. The mean cycle length of the induced AVNRT was 329 +/- 48 ms. RF ablation was successful in all patients (100%). A mean of 7 +/- 6 lesions were applied. Persistent jump or echo beats were noted in 48 patients (46%). The procedure lasted for 2.1 +/- 1.0 h. Fluoroscopy time was 23 +/- 14 min. Procedures were complicated by heart block in two patients (1.9%). Over 26 +/- 19 months, there has been only one recurrence of AVNRT (1%). The historical group had similar age (37 +/- 18 years), gender (17 men/38 women), AVNRT cycle length (340 +/- 60 ms), number of RF lesions (9 +/- 6), or residual slow pathway conduction (42%), but longer fluoroscopy time (41 +/- 25 min) and procedure duration (4 +/- 1 h), and a significantly higher recurrence rate (seven patients/13%) (P=0.004) at a much shorter follow-up period of 12 +/- 8 months. CONCLUSION: AVNRT recurrences are rare (1%) when slow pathway RF ablation is performed in medial or anterior locations at the tricuspid annulus, rather than in inferoposterior sites, whereby a higher (13%) recurrence rate has been previously noted.     

Effects of Slow Pathway Ablation on Fast Pathway Function in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Effects of Slow Pathway Ablation. Introduction: This study investigated whether fast pathway conduction properties are altered by slow pathway ablation in patients with AV nodal reentrant tacbycardia. Methods and Results: Forty consecutive patients who underwent successful ablation of the slow pathway were prospective subjects for the study. Isoproterenol was used to enhance conduction and to differentiate interactive mechanisms. Potential electrotonic interactions were assessed by comparing patients with and those without residual dual AV node pbysiology after slow pathway ablation. Paired and unpaired t-tests were used when appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. In the entire study population, heart rates were not significantly different before and after slow pathway ablation (RR = 770 ± 114 msec before and 745 ± 99 msec after, P = 0.07). Anterograde fast pathway conduction properties were unchanged after slow pathway ablation (effective refractory period, 348 ± 84 msec before and 336 ± 86 msec after, P = 0.13; shortest 1:1 conduction, 410 ± 93 msec before and 400 ± 82 msec after, P = 0.39). Retrograde fast pathway characteristics also were similar before and after ablation. Neither anterograde nor retrograde last pathway conduction properties during isoproterenol infusion were changed by slow pathway ablation. When the study population was further divided into patients with (n= 13) or without (n = 27) residual dual AV node pbysiology, no significant change was detected in fast pathway function in either group after slow patbway ablation. Conclusions: Fast pathway conduction characteristics were not affected by slow pathway ablation. In patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, observations suggest that fast and slow pathways are functionally distinct.     

Electrophysiologic Spectrum of Atrioventricular Nodal Behavior in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Undergoing Selective Fast or Slow Pathway Ablation

AV Nodal Behavior After Ablation. Introduction; The objective of this report is to delineate the atrioventricular (AV) nodal electrophysiologic behavior in patients undergoing fast or slow pathway ablation for control of their AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).
Methods and Results: One hundred sixteen consecutive patients with symptomatic AVNRT were included. Twenty-two patients underwent fast pathway ablation with complete abolition of AVNRT in all and development of complete AV block in five patients. Of 17 patients with intact AV conduction postablation, 12 had demonstrated antegrade dual pathway physiology during baseline study, which was maintained in three and lost in nine patients postablation. Two patients with successful fast pathway ablation developed uncommon AVNRT necessitating a slow pathway ablation. Twenty-one patients demonstrated both common and uncommon forms of AV nodal reentry during baseline study. The earliest site of atrial activation was close to the His-bundle recording site (anterior interatrial septum) during common variety and the coronary sinus ostium (posterior interatrial septum) during the uncommon AV nodal reentry in all 21 patients. Ninety-six patients underwent successful slow pathway ablation. Among these, the antegrade dual pathway physiology demonstrable during baseline study (60 patients) was maintained in 25 and lost in 35 patients postablation.
Conclusion: These data suggest that: (1) dual pathway physiology may persist after successful ablation, which might be a reflection of multiple reentrant pathways in patients with AVNRT: and (2) the retrograde pathways during common and uncommon AVNRT have anatomically separate atrial breakthroughs. These findings have important electrophysiologic implications regarding the prevailing concept of the AV nodal physiology in patients with AVNRT.     

Multiple AV nodal pathways in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia--more common than expected?

AIMS: It was the purpose of this study to determine the incidence of more than two AV nodal pathways in patients with AVNRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 78 consecutive patients with AV-nodal reentrant tachycardias (AVNRT) (50 females, 28 males, mean age 52.8 +/- 14.6 years), the number of sudden AH increases by 50 ms or more (AH-jump) was analysed during atrial extrastimulation. The incidence of two AV nodal pathways was accepted to be present in patients with AVNRT without an AH-jump ('smooth curve'). The following forms of tachycardia were induced: a typical AVNRT (slow-fast) in 67 patients, an atypical AVNRT (fast-slow) in 12 patients and a slow-slow-AVNRT in 4 patients. Five patients had two forms of AVNRT. 47 patients (60.3%) showed two AV nodal pathways, 27 patients (34.6%) had three AV-nodal pathways and 4 patients (5.1%) exhibited four AV-nodal pathways. For successful catheter ablation of AVNRT in patients with more than two pathways, more radiofrequency energy applications were required (9.2 +/- 6.3) compared with patients with only two pathways (6.7 +/- 4.8). Furthermore, in patients with more than two AV-nodal pathways, the catheter intervention resulted more frequently in a modulation of slow pathway conduction than in an ablation of the slow pathway(s). CONCLUSION: The incidence of more than two AV-nodal pathways in patients with AVNRT was unexpectedly high at about 40%. Thus, these tachycardias require a meticulous electrophysiological evaluation for successful ablation.     

Electrophysiologic Characteristics and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrioventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia with Second-Degree Atrioventricular Block

Second-Degree AV Block During AVNRT. Introduction : Detailed electrophysiologic study of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with 2:1 AV block has been limited.
Methods and Results : Six hundred nine consecutive patients with AVNRT underwent electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway. Twenty-six patients with 2:1 AV block during AVNRT were designated as group I, und those without this particular finding were designated as group II. The major findings of the present study were: (1) group I patients had better anterograde and retrograde AV nodal function, shorter tachycardia cycle length (during tachycardia with 1:1 conduction) (307 ± 30 vs 360 ± 58 msec, P < 0.001), and higher incidence of transient bundle branch block during tachycardia (18/26 vs 43/609, P < 0.001) than group II patients: (2) 21 (80.8%) group I patients had alternans of AA intervals during AVNRT with 2:1 AV block. Longer AH intervals (264 ± 26 vs 253 ± 27 msec, P = 0.031) were associated with the blocked beats. However, similar HA intervals (51 ± 12 vs 50 ± 12 msec, P = 0.363) and similar HV intervals (53 ± 11 vs 52 ± 12, P = 0.834) were found in the blocked and conducted beats; (3) ventricular extrastimulation before or during the His-bundle refractory period bundle could convert 2:1 AV block to 1:1 AV conduction.
Conclusions : Fast reentrant circuit, rather than underlying impaired conduction of the distal AV node or infranodal area, might account for second-degree AV block during AVNRT. Slow pathway ablation is safe and effective in patients who have AVNRT with 2:1 AV block.     

Effects of Partial and Complete Ablation of the Slow Pathway on Fast Pathway Properties in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Fast Pathway Properties. Introduction: The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the effects of complete and partial ablation of slow pathway function on the fast pathway effective refractory period (ERP).
Methods and Results: The subjects were 20 patients (mean age 43 ± 13 years) with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), no structural heart disease, and easily inducible AVNRT. Autonomic blockade was achieved with propranolol (0.2 mg/kg) and atropine (0.04 mg/kg). After elimination of AVNRT and during autonomic blockade, the presence of residual slow pathway function was determined by the presence of a single AV nodal echo and/or dual AV nodal physiology. After autonomic blockade and before ablation, the mean fast pathway ERP was 319 ± 44 msec and the mean slow pathway ERP was 251 ± 31 msec. After slow pathway ablation and during autonomic blockade, 7 patients had residual slow pathway function and 13 did not. Complete loss of slow pathway function was associated with a shortening of the fast pathway ERP from 334 ± 35 msec to 300 ± 62 msec (P < 0.01), while the fast pathway ERP did not change significantly in patients with residual slow pathway function (291 ± 29 msec vs 303 ± 38 msec, respectively; P = 0.08). A shortening of 30 msec or more in the fast pathway ERP was observed in 11 of 13 patients who did not have residual slow pathway function, compared to 0 of 7 patients with residual slow pathway function (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Shortening of the fast pathway ERP after successful ablation of AVNRT is dependent upon complete loss of slow pathway function. This observation is consistent with electrotonic inhibition of the fast pathway by the slow pathway.     

Persistence of Single Echo Beat Inducibility After Selective Ablation of the Slow Pathway in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia:

Residual Slow Pathway Conduction Effects on AVN Function. Introduction : Residual slow pathway conduction with or without reentrant echo beats has been reported in 25% to 30% of patients undergoing ablation for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).
Methods and Results : Fifty-eight consecutive patients (aged 45 ± 12 years) with slow-fast AVNRT underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway (SP). Residual slow-fast echo beat was documented in 21 (36%) of 58 patients (group A). The pre-and postablation AH intervals triggering the echo beats were similar (346 ± 8 msec vs 352 ± 6 msec, P = NS), as were the pre-and postablation echo zones (55 ± 6 msec vs 52 ± 5 msec, P = NS) and functional refractory period of the SP. A consistent prolongation of the AV nodal effective refractory period (AVN-ERP; from 265 ± 28 msec to 340 ± 50 msec, P < 0.001) and the Wenckebach cycle length (WBCL; from 298 ± 41 msec to 438 ± 43 msec, P < 0.001) was observed in all patients with abolition of SP conduction (group B). In group A patients, the prolongation of WBCL was less (285 ± 33 msec preablation, and 334 ± 41 msec postablation, P < 0.001). Additional pulses abolished the residual echo in 16 of 21 patients, and further prolongation of the AVN-ERP and WBCL comparable to those found in patients without a residual echo beat was observed. During 19 ± 8 months follow-up, no patient had clinical recurrence of AVNRT.
Conclusion : Residual single echo beat after SP ablation for AVNRT reflects the persistence of some portion of the SP with unchanged functional conduction properties whose prognostic significance is uncertain. A consistent increase of WBCL can be a reliable marker of complete abolition of slow pathway conduction and termination of AVNRT.     

Electrophysiological mechanisms of conversion of typical to atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia occurring after radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway

This report presents an adult patient with conversion of typical to atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) after slow pathway ablation. Application of radiofrequency energy (3 times) in the posteroseptal region changed the pattern of the atrioventricular (AV) node conduction curve from discontinuous to continuous, but did not change the continuous retrograde conduction curve. After ablation of the slow pathway, atrial extrastimulation induced atypical AVNRT. During tachycardia, the earliest atrial activation site changed from the His bundle region to the coronary sinus ostium. One additional radiofrequency current applied 5 mm upward from the initial ablation site made atypical AVNRT noninducible. These findings suggest that the mechanism of atypical AVNRT after slow pathway ablation is antegrade fast pathway conduction along with retrograde conduction through another slow pathway connected with the ablated antegrade slow pathway at a distal site. The loss of concealed conduction over the antegrade slow pathway may play an important role in the initiation of atypical AVNRT after slow pathway ablation.     

Percutaneous catheter modification of the atrioventricular node. A potential cure for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Our purpose was to describe a technique of atrioventricular (AV) node modification for patients with drug refractory AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Nine patients (mean age, 45 +/- 20; range, 14-82) with recurrent drug refractory AVNRT (n = 8) or sudden cardiac death thought to be precipitated by AVNRT (n = 1) underwent a percutaneous catheter procedure to modify AV nodal function. The area between the electrode recording the maximal His-bundle electrogram and the ostium of the coronary sinus was divided into three zones. Perinodal direct current shocks of 100-300 J were delivered to one (n = 2), two (n = 3), or three (n = 4) zones without complications. The procedure endpoints were modification of AV conduction (either first degree AV block or complete retrograde ventriculo-atrial [VA] block) and failure to induce AVNRT before or after isoproterenol and/or atropine administration. Six of nine patients (67%) have had no inducible or spontaneous AVNRT over a mean follow-up of 12.3 +/- 4.1 months (range, 4.5-17). One of the six underwent repeat, successful modification, because AVNRT was inducible at restudy 2 days after the initial procedure. AVNRT recurred in three patients (33%), one early (3 days) and two late (3-4 months). Two of these patients underwent complete ablation of the AV junction and permanent pacemaker placement, whereas one is controlled with drug therapy. Therefore, AV nodal modification resulted in tachycardia control without antiarrhythmic drugs in six of nine (67%) and obviated the need for complete AV junctional ablation in seven of nine patients (78%). Elimination of AVNRT appears to result from either block in the retrograde fast pathway or modification of the antegrade slow pathway, such that AVNRT cannot be sustained. Additional findings suggest that an atrio-Hisian accessory connection may not be involved in AVNRT in some of these patients. Percutaneous catheter AV nodal modification appears to be a promising technique for treatment of refractory AVNRT and may obviate need for complete AV junctional ablation in a substantial number of patients with drug/pacemaker refractory AVNRT.     

Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia in Patients with Sinus Node Dysfunction: Electrophysiologic Characteristics, Clinical Presentation, and Results of Slow Pathway Ablation

AVNRT and Sinus Node Dysfunction. Introduction: Sinus node dysfunction (SND) is frequently associated with impaired AV conduction. This study investigated the electrophysiologic properties of dual AV nodal pathways in patients suffering from both SND and AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Methods and Results: Two groups of patients with slow-fast AVNRT underwent invasive electrophysiologic testing and catheter ablation of the slow pathway. Group A comprised 10 patients with SND (age 70 ± 8 years), (Group B included 10 age-matched patients without SND (age 69 ± 7 years; P = NS) who served as controls. Patients of group A exhibited prolongation of the anterograde Wenckebach cycle lengths (WBCLs) of both the fast pathway (559 ± 96 vs 361 ± 38 msec; P < 0.01) and the slow pathway (409 ± 57 vs 339 ± 32 ms; P < 0.01). However, the delta between the WBCLs of the fast and the slow pathways was larger in patients of group A (150 ± 80 vs 22 ± 20 msec; P < 0.01). Retrograde fast pathway conduction was well preserved with no difference in WBCLs (356 ± 42 vs 330 ± 47 msec; P = NS). Cycle lengths of AVNRT were longer in group A (468 ± 46 vs 363 ± 37 msec; P < 0.01). Clinically, all patients of group A suffered from multiple episodes of AVNRT per week, which was not the case in any patient of group B (P < 0.01). Catheter ablation of the slow pathway eliminated AVNRT in all patients without complications. Conclusions: Patients with AVNRT and SND exhibit characteristic electrophysiologic alterations of both AV nodal pathways. Clinically, this results in significantly more frequent episodes of tachycardia. Slow pathway ablation appears to be safe and effective in these patients.