Assessing the association between bisphosphonate exposure and delayed mucosal healing after tooth extraction

BackgroundTooth extraction in patients exposed to bisphosphonates (BPs) is considered a risk factor for osteonecrosis. The authors evaluated the time to mucosal healing and frequency of osteonecrosis after tooth extraction in participants exposed to BPs.MethodsThe authors compared wound healing after tooth extraction in participants exposed to BPs with that in control participants who had not been exposed to BPs. Variables included age, sex, type of BP therapy (oral or intravenous), BP exposure time and C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) test results. The authors followed up patients weekly or biweekly until healing was complete. They used multivariable analyses to model time to healing in the presence of covariates, and estimates provided hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 percent confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for all variables in the model.ResultsThe authors enrolled 53 participants with BP exposure and 39 control participants. Postextraction healing was significantly longer in participants exposed to BPs (P < .001) than it was in control participants. One patient (1.9 percent) developed osteonecrosis. A Cox proportional hazards model in which the authors controlled for age, sex and CTX values showed that BP exposure alone significantly (adjusted HR, 0.27; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.16–0.48) increased mucosal healing time.ConclusionsThe study results showed that postextraction healing was impaired in patients exposed to BPs. CTX values were not associated with delayed healing after tooth extraction.Practical ImplicationsPostextraction healing was delayed in patients receiving BP therapy. However, the risk of developing osteonecrosis was low.     

An evaluation of 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels in patients with acute toothaches: Efficacy,tolerability and compliance with label dose administration directions

BackgroundThe authors evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels compared with those of a vehicle (placebo) gel for the temporary relief of toothache pain. They also assessed the compliance with the label dose administration directions on the part of participants with toothache pain.MethodsUnder double-masked conditions, 576 participants self-applied study gel to an open tooth cavity and surrounding oral tissues. Participants evaluated their pain intensity and pain relief for 120 minutes. The authors determined the amount of gel the participants applied.ResultsThe responders’ rates (the primary efficacy parameter), defined as the percentage of participants who had an improvement in pain intensity as exhibited by a pain score reduction of at least one unit on the dental pain scale from baseline for two consecutive assessments any time between the five- and 20-minute points, were 87.3 percent, 80.7 percent and 70.4 percent, respectively, for 20 percent benzocaine gel, 10 percent benzocaine gel and vehicle gel. Both benzocaine gels were significantly (P ≤ .05) better than vehicle gel; the 20 percent benzocaine gel also was significantly (P ≤ .05) better than the 10 percent benzocaine gel. The mean amount of gel applied was 235.6 milligrams, with 88.2 percent of participants applying 400 mg or less.ConclusionsBoth 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels were more efficacious than the vehicle gel, and the 20 percent benzocaine gel was more efficacious than the 10 percent benzocaine gel. All treatments were well tolerated by participants.Practical ImplicationsPatients can use 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels to temporarily treat toothache pain safely.     

Restoration of noncarious tooth defects by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network

BackgroundThe authors conducted a study to quantify the reasons for restoring noncarious tooth defects (NCTDs) by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) and to assess the tooth, patient and dentist characteristics associated with those reasons.MethodsData were collected by 178 DPBRN dentists regarding the placement of 1,301 consecutive restorations owing to NCTDs. Information gathered included the main clinical reason, other than dental caries, for restoration of previously unrestored permanent tooth surfaces; characteristics of patients who received treatment; dentists’ and dental practices’ characteristics; teeth and surfaces restored; and restorative materials used.ResultsDentists most often placed restorations to treat lesions caused by abrasion, abfraction or erosion (AAE) (46 percent) and tooth fracture (31 percent). Patients 41 years or older received restorations mainly because of AAE (P < .001). Premolars and anterior teeth were restored mostly owing to AAE; molars were restored mostly owing to tooth fracture (P < .001). Dentists used directly placed resin-based composite (RBC) largely to restore AAE lesions and fractured teeth (P < .001).ConclusionsAmong DPBRN practices, AAE and tooth fracture were the main reasons for restoring noncarious tooth surfaces. Pre-molars and anterior teeth of patients 41 years and older are most likely to receive restorations owing to AAE; molars are most likely to receive restorations owing to tooth fracture. Dentists restored both types of NCTDs most often with RBC.     

At-home oral care for adults with developmental disabilities: A survey of caregivers

BackgroundLittle is known about effective at-home oral care methods for people with developmental disabilities (DDs) who are unable to perform personal preventive practices themselves and rely on caregivers for assistance.MethodsA convenience sample of 808 caregivers (84.5 percent paid, 15.5 percent family members) who accompanied adults with DDs (20 years or older) to appointments at a specialized statewide dental care system completed computer-assisted personal interview surveys. The authors used these data to investigate caregivers' at-home oral care experiences and to explore differences between caregivers who were paid and those who were family members.ResultsCaregivers reported that a high proportion (85 percent) of dentate adults with DDs received assistance with tooth cleaning. They also reported a high prevalence of dental problems, and low adherence to brushing (79 percent) and flossing (22 percent) recommendations. More caregivers reported that they felt confident assisting with brushing than with flossing (85 percent versus 54 percent). Family members and paid caregivers differed with respect to confidence and training.ConclusionsAt-home oral care, particularly flossing, presents substantial challenges for adults with DDs. Solutions must be tailored to address the different experiences and distinct needs of the family members and paid caregivers who assist these adults.Practical ImplicationsCaregivers play an important role in providing at-home oral care, and they must be included in efforts to improve oral health outcomes for people with DDs.     

Is change in probing depth a reliable predictor of change in clinical attachment loss?

Background

1. Download : Download full-size image

Clinicians and researchers need a measure for monitoring the periodontal condition of their patients or study participants. The authors explored the utility of change in probing depth (PD) for predicting change in clinical attachment loss (CAL).MethodsThe authors used clinical trial data from 363 participants who had received nonsurgical treatment to describe associations between PD and CAL changes. They computed the association between PD and CAL changes—correlation, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values—according to tooth type, tooth site and initial PD.ResultsDepending on the subset of tooth sites, sensitivity of PD change to predict CAL change ranged from 18 to 74 percent; the highest sensitivity was at initially deep sites. Specificity and negative predictive value were higher than sensitivity and positive predictive value. Correlations between person-level mean PD and CAL changes ranged from 0.60 to 0.79 and were highest at initially deep sites.ConclusionsExcept at initially deep sites, PD change did not reliably predict CAL change. Clinicians and researchers who measure only PD may fail to identify teeth that lose or gain attachment.Clinical ImplicationsClinicians should consider monitoring CAL to detect changes in periodontal status more reliably. It is unknown if these findings apply to patients treated surgically or to prediction of tooth loss.     

Dental treatment intensity in frail older adults in the last year of life

BackgroundPalliative care focusing on pain and infection is recommended for patients who are terminally ill. It is difficult to implement this strategy in practice because of the lack of clear guidelines. The authors conducted a study to examine dental treatment provided to a group of long-term care (LTC) residents in the last year of life.MethodsThe authors retrospectively followed 197 LTC residents (60 years or older) in the last year of life to death. On the basis of the dental services patients received between the new patient examination and death, the authors categorized the patients into three groups: no care (NC), limited care (LC) and usual care (UC). The authors developed a multivariable continuation ratio logit model with shared regression coefficients across two logits to identify the factors associated with the end-of-life dental care pattern.ResultsThe authors found that 50.8 percent of the patients received NC before death. Among those who received treatment, 62.9 percent received UC, and 60.7 percent of the patients in the UC group had completed their treatment in the last three months of life. A three-month increment in survival and having dental insurance resulted in 1.74 (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 1.32–2.30) and 2.59 (95 percent CI, 1.03–6.52) times greater odds, respectively, of receiving some dental treatment before death. Neither survival nor dental insurance, however, was associated with dental care intensity in the last year of life (that is, UC versus LC).ConclusionsWhile most of the patients who were in the last year of life received insufficient dental care, comprehensive treatment was provided commonly to frail patients at the end of life, raising questions about quality of care.Practical ImplicationsPalliative oral health management needs to be revisited to improve quality of care for frail older adults at the end of life.     

Concordance between clinical practice and published evidence: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

BackgroundDocumenting the gap between what is occurring in clinical practice and what published research findings suggest should be happening is an important step toward improving care. The authors conducted a study to quantify the concordance between clinical practice and published evidence across preventive, diagnostic and treatment procedures among a sample of dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (“the network”).MethodsNetwork dentists completed one questionnaire about their demographic characteristics and another about how they treat patients across 12 scenarios/clinical practice behaviors. The authors coded responses to each scenario/clinical practice behavior as consistent (“1”) or inconsistent (“0”) with published evidence, summed the coded responses and divided the sum by the number of total responses to create an overall concordance score. The overall concordance score was calculated as the mean percentage of responses that were consistent with published evidence.ResultsThe authors limited analyses to participants in the United States (N = 591). The study results show a mean concordance at the practitioner level of 62 percent (SD = 18 percent); procedure-specific concordance ranged from 8 to 100 percent. Affiliation with a large group practice, being a female practitioner and having received a dental degree before 1990 were independently associated with high concordance (≥ 75 percent).ConclusionDentists reported a medium-range concordance between practice and published evidence.Practical ImplicationsEfforts to bring research findings into routine practice are needed.     

Vitamin and mineral supplements: Friend or foe when combined with medications?

Background.Given the prevalence of vitamin and mineral supplement use among consumers and the potential for vitamin- and mineral-drug interactions, as well as oral and systemic adverse effects of excess consumption, oral health care providers (OHCPs) should ask all patients about their use. The challenges for OHCPs are how to recognize oral and systemic manifestations of these interactions and how to safely manage the care of these patients while avoiding potential interactions.Methods.The authors reviewed the literature regarding interactions between popular vitamin and mineral supplements and medications used commonly in dentistry. They used clinical databases and decision support tools to classify interactions according to their level of patient risk. They address interactions of greatest clinical concern with a high-quality evidence-based foundation in either randomized controlled clinical trials or meta-analyses.Conclusion.Most medications used commonly in dentistry can be prescribed safely without regard to vitamin- and mineral-drug interactions. However, patients taking anticoagulants or cytochrome P450 3A4 substrates (such as clarithromycin, erythromycin, ketoconazole, itraconazole, midazolam and triazolam) in addition to specific vitamin or mineral supplements (vitamins D, E, K, calcium, fluoride, iron, magnesium, selenium or zinc) may face additional challenges. OHCPs need to recognize these potential interactions and know how to manage the care of patients who may be receiving treatment with these combination therapies.Practical Implications.Recognition and avoidance of potential vitamin- and mineral-drug interactions will help clinicians optimize patient treatment while emphasizing patient safety.     

Twenty-month follow-up of occlusal caries lesions deemed questionable at baseline: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

Background.A questionable occlusal caries (QOC) lesion can be defined as an occlusal surface with no radiographic evidence of caries, but caries is suspected because of clinical appearance. In this study, the authors report the results of a 20-month follow-up of these lesions.Methods.Fifty-three clinicians from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network participated in this study, recording lesion characteristics at baseline and lesion status at 20 months.Results.At baseline, 1,341 QOC lesions were examined; the treatment that was planned for 1,033 of those at baseline was monitoring (oral hygiene instruction, applying or prescribing fluoride or varnish, or both), and the remaining 308 received a sealant (n = 192) or invasive therapy (n = 116). At the 20-month visit, clinicians continued to monitor 927 (90 percent) of the 1,033 monitored lesions. Clinicians decided to seal 61 (6 percent) of the 1,033 lesions (mean follow-up, 19 months) and invasively treat 45 (4 percent) of them (mean follow-up, 15 months). Young patient age (< 18 years) (odds ratio = 3.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7-6.8) and the lesion&apos;s being on a molar (odds ratio = 1.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3-2.6) were associated with the clinician&apos;s deciding at some point after follow-up to seal the lesion or treat it invasively.Conclusions.Almost all (90 percent) QOC lesions for which the treatment planned at baseline was monitoring still were planned to undergo monitoring after 20 months. This finding suggests that noninvasive management is appropriate for these lesions.Practical Implications.Previous study results from baseline indicated a high prevalence of QOC lesions (34 percent). Clinicians should consider long-term monitoring when making treatment decisions about these lesions.     

The role of dentin moisture in the degradation of resin-dentin interfaces under clinical and laboratory conditions

BackgroundThe authors conducted a study to evaluate the influence of dentin moisture on the degradation of the resin-dentin interface in primary teeth under clinical and laboratory conditions.MethodsThe authors prepared 40 Class I restorations (five teeth per group) by using a cylindrical diamond bur, leaving a flat dentin surface on the pulpal floor. They vigorously rubbed two coats of a simplified etch-and-rinse adhesive on either dry or wet demineralized dentin under clinical or laboratory conditions. After performing restorative procedures, the authors extracted teeth prepared under clinical conditions after 20 minutes (immediately) or the teeth exfoliated after six months. The authors also tested the teeth prepared under laboratory conditions immediately or after six months of being stored in water. They sectioned the teeth to obtain resin-dentin bonded specimens for microtensile testing and for silver nitrate uptake (SNU) under scanning electron microscopy. They performed a three-way analysis of variance and Tukey test (α = .05) on the SNU bond strength data.ResultsStatistically higher bond strength values (megapascals [standard deviation]) were observed when bonding was performed under laboratory conditions (clinical = 25.2 [3.6] MPa versus laboratory = 28.5 [4.4] MPa; P < .05). Degradation occurred only in the wet dentin groups under both experimental conditions (immediately = 31.3 [4.5] MPa versus after six months = 21.3 [2.1] MPa; P < .05). SNU occurred in all groups and was statistically higher after six months of clinical function or water storage (immediately = 13.9 [4.9 SD] percent versus after six months = 34.1 [4.5 SD] percent; P < .05).ConclusionsThe bonding of adhesives to dry demineralized dentin produces adhesive interfaces that are more resistant to degradation regardless of the bonding condition.Clinical ImplicationsResin-dentin bond strengths produced under laboratory conditions in primary teeth may be higher than those obtained under clinical circumstances, although both conditions (clinical and laboratory) seemed to yield similar results. Bonding to dry demineralized primary tooth dentin produced resin-dentin interfaces that were more resistant to degradation.     

Treating dental patients who use oral antithrombotic medication: a survey of dentists in the Netherlands

BackgroundFor many years, international guidelines have advised health care professionals not to adjust oral antithrombotic medication (OAM) regimens before invasive dental procedures. The authors conducted a study to examine the opinions of Dutch general dentists regarding the dental care of patients receiving treatment with these medications.MethodsThe authors invited via e-mail 1,442 general dentists in the Netherlands to answer a 20-item Internet-based questionnaire that they developed. Survey items consisted of questions about medical history taking, number of patients in the dental practice receiving OAM therapy, frequency of consulting with medical and dental colleagues and suggested dental treatment of patients during various invasive dental procedures.ResultsA total of 487 questionnaires were returned (response rate of 34 percent). The mean age of respondents was 47 years, and 77 percent were male. The majority of dentists responded that they obtain medical histories, but that they did not know how many of their patients were receiving OAM treatment. Dentists reported that they consult with medical colleagues frequently about antithrombotic medication. Ninety-one percent of respondents stated that they obtained their medical knowledge primarily in dental school. More than 50 percent of the dentists reported that they were not familiar with the international normalized ratio. The majority of dentists responded that they felt a need for clinical practice guidelines.ConclusionsAccording to the results of our survey, most dentists remain cautious when performing invasive dental procedures in patients who are treated with OAMs. Moreover, survey respondents tended to estimate that the risk of bleeding during dental procedures when OAM therapy is continued is higher than the risk of rethrombosis when use of antithrombotic medication is interrupted.Clinical ImplicationsA growing proportion of elderly patients and those with medically complex conditions are being treated in dental practices in the Netherlands. Consequently, more needs to be done to ensure that dentists are offered evidence-based guidance when treating patients who receive OAMs.     

Screening for diabetes mellitus in dental practices: A field trial

BackgroundIn this field trial, the authors assess the feasibility of screening for diabetes and prediabetes in dental practices and in a community health center.MethodsDental patients 45 years and older who were not aware of their diabetic status underwent evaluation for diabetes risk with an American Diabetes Association Diabetes Risk Test and with hemoglobin (Hb) A_1c measurement. Participants with an HbA_1c level of 5.7 percent or greater were referred to their physicians for diagnosis.ResultsOf the 1,022 patients screened, 416 (40.7 percent) had an HbA_1c blood level of 5.7 percent or greater and were referred for diagnosis. The HbA_1c and the American Diabetes Association Diabetes Risk Test were correlated (P < .001). Of the 416 participants who were referred, 35.1 percent received a diagnosis from their physicians within one year; 78.8 percent of these patients were seen in the community health center and 21.4 percent were seen in private dental offices. The diagnoses were diabetes (12.3 percent of patients), high risk of developing diabetes (that is, prediabetes) (23.3 percent) and no diabetes (64.4 percent).ConclusionsThe study results show that screening for prediabetes and diabetes is feasible in a dental office, with acceptance by the dentist and dental office staff members, patients&apos; physicians and patients. Patients from the community health center demonstrated good compliance with referrals to physicians; however, compliance was poor among those in the private dental offices.Practical ImplicationsScreening for diabetes and prediabetes in the dental office may provide an important benefit to patients and encourage interprofessional collaboration to achieve a chronic care model in which health care professionals work together to care for a panel of patients.     

Tooth preservation or implant placement: A systematic review of long-term tooth and implant survival rates

BackgroundFor the past few decades, dental implants have served as reliable replacements for missing teeth. However, there is an increasing trend toward replacing diseased teeth with dental implants.Types of Studies ReviewedThe authors conducted a systematic review of long-term survival rates of teeth and implants. They searched the MEDLINE database for relevant publications up to March 2013. They considered studies in which investigators assessed the long-term effectiveness of dental implants or that of tooth preservation. They included only studies that had follow-up periods of 15 years or longer.ResultsThe authors selected 19 articles for inclusion. Investigators in nine studies assessed the tooth survival rate, whereas investigators in 10 studies assessed the implant survival rate. When comparing the overall long-term (that is, 15 years or more) tooth loss rate with that of implants, the authors observed rates ranging between 3.6 and 13.4 percent and 0 and 33 percent for teeth and implants, respectively. They could not perform a meta-analysis because of the substantial differences between the studies.Practical ImplicationsThe results of this systematic review show that implant survival rates do not exceed those of compromised but adequately treated and maintained teeth, supporting the notion that the decision to extract a tooth and place a dental implant should be made cautiously. Even when a tooth seems to be compromised and requires treatment to be maintained, implant treatment also might require additional surgical procedures that might pose some risks as well. Furthermore, a tooth can be extracted and replaced at any time; however, extraction is a definitive and irreversible treatment.     

Restorative outcomes for endodontically treated teeth in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning network

BackgroundThe authors aimed to determine the outcome of and factors associated with success and failure of restorations in endodontically treated teeth in patients in practices participating in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network.MethodsPractitioner-investigators (P-Is) invited the enrollment of all patients seeking care at participating practices who had undergone primary endodontic therapy and restoration in a permanent tooth three to five years earlier. P-Is classified endodontically reated teeth as restorative failures if the restoration was replaced, the restoration needed replacement or the tooth was cracked or fractured.ResultsP-Is from 64 practices enrolled in the study 1,298 eligible patients who had endodontically treated teeth that had been restored. The mean (standard deviation) time to follow-up was 3.9 (0.6) years. Of the 1,298 enrolled teeth, P-Is classified 181 (13.9 percent; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 12.1–15.8 percent) as restorative failures: 44 (3.4 percent) due to cracks or fractures, 57 (4.4 percent) due to replacement of the original restoration for reasons other than fracture and 80 (6.2 percent) due to need for a new restoration. When analyzing the results by means of multivariate logistic regression, the authors found a greater risk of restorative failure to be associated with canines or incisors and premolars (P = .04), intracoronal restorations (P < .01), lack of preoperative proximal contacts (P < .01), presence of periodontal connective-tissue attachment loss (P < .01), younger age (P = .01), Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (P = .04) and endodontic therapy not having been performed by a specialist (P = .04).ConclusionsThese results suggest that molars (as opposed to other types of teeth), full-coverage restorations, preoperative proximal contacts, good periodontal health, non-Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, endodontic therapy performed by a specialist and older patient age are associated with restorative success for endodontically treated teeth in general practice.Clinical ImplicationsThese results contribute to the clinical evidence base to help guide practitioners when planning the restoration of endodontically treated teeth.     

The prevalence of caries and tooth loss among participants in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

Background.The Hispanic and Latino population is projected to increase from 16.7 percent to 30.0 percent by 2050. Previous U.S. national surveys had minimal representation of Hispanic and Latino participants other than Mexicans, despite evidence suggesting that Hispanic or Latino country of origin and degree of acculturation influence health outcomes in this population. In this article, the authors describe the prevalence and mean number of cavitated, decayed and filled surfaces, missing teeth and edentulism among Hispanics and Latinos of different national origins.Methods.Investigators in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL)—a multicenter epidemiologic study funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute with funds transferred from six other institutes, including the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research—conducted in-person examinations and interviews with more than 16,000 participants aged 18 to 74 years in four U.S. cities between March 2008 and June 2011. The investigators identified missing, filled and decayed teeth according to a modified version of methods used in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The authors computed prevalence estimates (weighted percentages), weighted means and standard errors for measures.Results.The prevalence of decayed surfaces ranged from 20.2 percent to 35.5 percent, depending on Hispanic or Latino background, whereas the prevalence of decayed and filled surfaces ranged from 82.7 percent to 87.0 percent, indicating substantial amounts of dental treatment. The prevalence of missing teeth ranged from 49.8 percent to 63.8 percent and differed according to Hispanic or Latino background. Significant differences in the mean number of decayed surfaces, decayed or filled surfaces and missing teeth according to Hispanic and Latino background existed within each of the age groups and between women and men.Conclusions.Oral health status differs according to Hispanic or Latino background, even with adjustment for age, sex and other characteristics.Practical Implications.These data indicate that Hispanics and Latinos in the United States receive restorative dental treatment and that practitioners should consider the association between Hispanic or Latino origin and oral health status. This could mean that dental practices in areas dominated by patients from a single Hispanic or Latino background can anticipate a practice based on a specific pattern of treatment needs.     

The malignant transformation of oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: A systematic review

BackgroundDetermining the potential for malignant transformation of oral lichen planus (OLP) is complicated by difficulties in diagnosis, differentiation from oral lichenoid lesions (OLLs) and the phenomenon of premalignant lesions&apos; exhibiting lichenoid characteristics. The authors of this systematic review evaluated evidence regarding malignant transformation of OLP and characterized transformation prevalence, clinical characteristics of OLP lesions developing into squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and time to transformation.Types of Studies ReviewedThe authors searched PubMed, Embase and Thomson Reuters Web of Science in a systematic approach. They evaluated observational English-language studies involving human participants published in peer-reviewed journals. Inclusion required patients to have the diagnosis of OLP or OLL as confirmed with biopsy results on initial enrollment. They excluded all patients who had dysplasia on initial biopsy of OLP or OLL lesions.ResultsSixteen studies were eligible. Among 7,806 patients with OLP, 85 developed SCC. Among 125 patients with OLL, four developed SCC. The rate of transformation in individual studies ranged from 0 to 3.5 percent. The overall rate of transformation was 1.09 percent for OLP; in the solitary study in which investigators evaluated OLL, the rate of transformation was 3.2 percent. Patients&apos; average age at onset of SCC was 60.8 years. The authors noted a slight predominance of female patients among those who experienced malignant transformation. The most common subsite of malignant transformation was the tongue. The average time from diagnosis of OLP or OLL to transformation was 51.4 months.Practical ImplicationsA small subset of patients with a diagnosis of OLP eventually developed SCC. The most common demographic characteristics of patients in this subset were similar to the most common demographic characteristics associated with OLP in general (that is, being female, being older and being affected in areas common to this condition). It is prudent for clinicians to pursue continued regular observation and follow-up in patients with these conditions, even in patients who do not fit a traditional high-risk category for oral SCC.     

Implications of medical screenings of patients arriving for dental treatment: The results of a comprehensive laboratory screening

BackgroundThe authors conducted medical laboratory screenings in a dental setting to determine the relationships between the laboratory test results and self-reported medical health findings.MethodsThe authors collected serum, urine and medical histories from 171 patients (116 [68 percent] women; mean age, 43.4 years) who arrived for dental treatment as a component of a clinical trial and performed complete blood cell counts, standard blood chemistry panels and urinalysis on the samples.ResultsThe authors found 414 abnormal laboratory test results (an average of 2.42 per patient). Eighty-three percent of participants had one or more abnormal test results, 83 percent had abnormal test results and did not indicate a relevant disease in their medical history, and 18 percent had laboratory test results outside the 99 percent reference range (that is, > three standard deviations from the mean). Abnormal test results were significantly associated with sex, age, race and medical history (P < .05). Abnormal test results associated with kidney disease were related to patients with cardiovascular disease and diabetes, as well as those who tended to be on average older than 50 years.ConclusionsThe high frequency of significant abnormal laboratory test results detected in this study suggests that many patients may be unaware of their medical statuses.Practical ImplicationsAbnormal laboratory test results are detected frequently in the serum and urine of patients arriving for dental treatment, which could indicate undiagnosed disease and less than optimal medical management.     

A retrospective review of clinical international normalized ratio results and their implications

BackgroundWarfarin is a key element in therapy for atrial fibrillation, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), stroke (cerebrovascular accident) and cardiac valve replacement. Often, patients’ warfarin blood levels are not tightly controlled with regard to accepted therapeutic ranges, by virtue of the drug’s unpredictable nature.MethodsThe authors searched 16,017 active clinical charts for active patients of record from the three campuses of the School of Dentistry, Marquette University (MU), Milwaukee, for the years 2009 and 2010. Dental records of 315 patients contained entries including “INR,” the abbreviation for the term “international normalized ratio.” Only 247 of those records contained an indication of whether the patient’s INR values were within therapeutic range. The authors found that 1.96 percent of the total MU dental clinic patient population had a history of warfarin use.ResultsWhen the authors compared the INR values for patients with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, DVT, stroke and cardiac valve replacement, they found that INR values for 107 of the 247 patients (43.3 percent) were not within therapeutic range for the respective diagnoses. For example, only 50 percent of the patients being treated for atrial fibrillation presented themselves for surgical dental treatment while their INR values were in tight control.ConclusionThe INR values for a significant number of dental patients are not within the therapeutic range for their medical conditions. These patients need to seek follow-up care from their medical care providers.Clinical ImplicationsScreening for INR in the dental office—especially before invasive dental treatment such as periodontal surgery, tooth extraction and dental implant placement—can help prevent postoperative complications. It also can aid the clinician in evaluating whether a patient’s INR is within therapeutic range and, subsequently, whether the patient’s physician needs to adjust the warfarin dosage.     

Preventing and treating white-spot lesions associated with orthodontic treatment: a survey of general dentists and orthodontists

BackgroundThe authors investigated the prevention and treatment of white-spot lesions (WSLs) during and after orthodontic therapy from the perspective of general dentists and orthodontists.MethodsThe authors administered a cross-sectional survey to general dentists (n = 191) and orthodontists (n = 305) in Virginia, Maryland and North Carolina.ResultsSixty-nine percent of general dentists and 76 percent of orthodontists recommended in-office fluoride treatment for patients with severe WSLs immediately after orthodontic treatment. Sixty-nine percent of general dentists reported that they had treated WSLs during the previous year, and 37 percent of orthodontists reported that they had removed braces because of patients' poor oral hygiene. Sixty percent of orthodontists referred patients with WSLs to general dentists for treatment. Eighty-five percent of orthodontists responded that they encouraged patients to use a fluoride rinse as a preventive measure. More than one-third of general dentists indicated that severe WSLs after orthodontic treatment could have a negative effect on their perception of the treating orthodontist.ConclusionsWSLs are a common complication of orthodontic treatment and their presence can result in a negative perception of the treating orthodontist by the patient's general dentist.Clinical implicationsGeneral dentists and orthodontists should work together to prevent the development of WSLs in their patients. Treatment with fluoride supplements and motivating and training patients to practice good oral hygiene will help achieve this goal. Treatment after debonding should include the topical application of low concentrations of fluoride.     

Effectiveness of a resin-modified glass ionomer liner in reducing hypersensitivity in posterior restorations: A study from the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning Network

BackgroundThe objectives of this randomized comparative effectiveness study conducted by members of the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network were to determine whether using a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) liner reduces postoperative hypersensitivity (POH) in dentin-bonded Class I and Class II resin-based composite (RBC) restorations, as well as to identify other factors (putative risk factors) associated with increased POH.MethodsPEARL Network practitioner-investigators (P-Is) (n = 28) were trained to assess sensitivity determination, enamel and dentin caries activity rankings, evaluation for sleep bruxism, and materials and techniques used. The P-Is enrolled 341 participants who had hypersensitive posterior lesions. Participants were randomly assigned to receive an RBC restoration with or without an RMGI liner before P-Is applied a one-step, self-etching bonding agent. P-Is conducted sensitivity evaluations at baseline, at one and four weeks after treatment, and at all visits according to patient-reported outcomes.ResultsP-Is collected complete data regarding 347 restorations (339 participants) at baseline, with 341 (98 percent) (333 participants) recalled at four weeks. Treatment groups were balanced across baseline characteristics and measures. RBC restorations with or without an RMGI liner had the same one-week and four-week POH outcomes, as measured clinically (by means of cold or air stimulation) and according to patient-reported outcomes.ConclusionsUse of an RMGI liner did not reduce clinically measured or patient-reported POH in moderate-depth Class I and Class II restorations. Cold and air clinical stimulation findings were similar between groups.Practical Implications. The time, effort and expense involved in placing an RMGI liner in these moderate-depth RBC restorations may be unnecessary, as the representative liner used did not improve hypersensitivity outcomes.