Blunt hepatic trauma in adults: CT-based classification and correlation with prognosis and treatment

To further define the computed tomographic (CT) criteria on which to guide the nonsurgical treatment of adult patients with blunt hepatic injury, the authors retrospectively reviewed abdominal CT scans obtained before surgery during a 35-month period. Blunt hepatic injury was diagnosed in 187 patients, and review revealed 37 patients in whom the liver was the site of sole or principal intraabdominal injury detected with the help of CT before surgery. A CT-based hepatic injury classification system partly derived from similar systems established with surgical assessment was devised to grade the severity of hepatic injury. CT-based injury scores ranging from grade 1 to 5 were compared with the clinical outcome in patients treated surgically and nonsurgically. Thirty-one patients (83.7%) were successfully treated without surgery, and four patients (10.8%) had findings at celiotomy that did not require further surgery. No patient who was initially treated without surgery required delayed celiotomy due to hepatic injury. The results indicate that even major hepatic injury up to and including grade 4 severity assessed with preoperative CT can usually be managed without surgery in hemodynamically stable patients.     

Nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury: use of CT criteria to select patients for splenic arteriography and potential endovascular therapy

PURPOSE: To determine if contrast material-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) can be used to select patients with blunt splenic injuries to undergo arteriographic embolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 15-month period, 78 patients who were hemodynamically stable and required no immediate surgery underwent contrast-enhanced spiral CT followed by splenic arteriography. CT scans were assessed for splenic vascular contrast material extravasation or posttraumatic splenic vascular lesions. Medical records were reviewed for splenic arteriographic results and clinical outcome. RESULTS: There were 25 grade I, 12 grade II, 27 grade III, 12 grade IV, and two grade V splenic injuries. CT showed active contrast material extravasation in seven patients and splenic vascular lesions in 19 patients. At CT, splenic vascular contrast material extravasation was 100% (seven of seven patients) and a posttraumatic splenic vascular lesion was 83% (10 of 12 patients) sensitive on the basis of arteriographic or surgical outcome in predicting the need for transcatheter embolization or splenic surgery. Overall, CT had a sensitivity of 81% (17 of 21 patients), a specificity of 84% (48 of 57 patients), negative and positive predictive values of 92% (48 of 52 patients) and 65% (17 of 26 patients), respectively, and an accuracy of 83% (65 of 78 patients) in predicting the need for splenic injury treatment. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced spiral CT plays a valuable role in selecting hemodynamically stable patients with splenic vascular injury who may be treated with transcatheter therapy and potentially improves the success rate of nonsurgical management.     

Splenic trauma: can CT grading systems enable prediction of successful nonsurgical treatment?

The capability of computed tomographic (CT) grading systems to enable prediction of successful nonsurgical treatment of splenic trauma in children and adults was evaluated. Fifty-six patients with documented splenic injury were examined with CT by use of standard trauma protocols. Each CT scan was graded according to two recently proposed grading systems. The charts of these patients were then reviewed, and correlations between the CT grade and clinical outcome were determined with each grading system. Forty patients underwent successful nonsurgical treatment; three of these patients (8%) underwent delayed celiotomy for splenic rupture after failure of nonsurgical treatment. Two of these three had grades that indicated nonsurgical treatment was viable. In each of these three patients, splenectomy was necessary. In the 16 patients who underwent surgery, eight cases (50%) of CT grading errors were documented with surgery. In four cases, the extent of the injury was underscored with CT, and in another four cases the injury was overscored. It is still not clear whether the severity of splenic injury as defined with CT correlates with clinical outcome.     

Hemoperitoneum as the sole indicator of abdominal visceral injuries: a potential limitation of screening abdominal US for trauma.

PURPOSE: To determine, at screening ultrasonography, the prevalence, severity, and clinical outcome of clinically important abdominal visceral injuries, without associated hemoperitoneum, that result from blunt abdominal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) was performed at admission in 466 patients with visceral injury. A retrospective review was performed of findings from surgery and contrast material-enhanced spiral and conventional CT performed to verify abdominal visceral injuries in 467 (4%) of 11,188 patients with blunt trauma. These patients were admitted to a level 1 trauma center over 33 months to determine the presence of hemoperitoneum and to identify the grade of injury. Medical records of patients with abdominal visceral injury without hemoperitoneum were reviewed for the management required and for results of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST). RESULTS: A total of 575 abdominal visceral injuries were identified at CT and/or surgery. Findings of CT at admission (n = 156) and of surgery (n = 1) revealed no evidence of hemoperitoneum in 157 (34%) patients with abdominal visceral injury; 26 (17%) of whom also had negative FAST studies. Abdominal visceral injuries diagnosed in patients without hemoperitoneum included 57 (27%) of 210 splenic injuries, 71 (34%) of 206 hepatic injuries, 30 (48%) of 63 renal injuries, four (11%) of 35 mesenteric injuries, and two (29%) of seven pancreatic injuries. Surgical and/or angiographic intervention was required in 26 (17%) patients without hemoperitoneum. CONCLUSION: Reliance on the presence of hemoperitoneum as the sole indicator of abdominal visceral injury limits the value of FAST as a screening diagnostic modality for patients who sustain blunt abdominal trauma.     

Blunt splenic injury: usefulness of transcatheter arterial embolization in patients with a transient response to fluid resuscitation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in hemodynamically unstable patients with blunt splenic injury in whom there is a transient response to initial fluid resuscitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human subject committee approval and informed consent were obtained. Angiography was performed in patients with contrast material extravasation and/or splenic injury of grade III or higher (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma criteria) at computed tomography (CT). TAE was performed when angiograms showed disruption of terminal splenic branches or arterial extravasation. Among 104 patients with splenic injury, the 15 patients (10 male, five female; mean age, 36.2 years) with a transient response to fluid resuscitation were the subjects of this study. A post hoc analysis was performed for CT grades, angiographic findings, associated injuries, and hemodynamic status in the subjects. RESULTS: Among 15 patients with a transient response, two had grade III, 11 had grade IV, and two had grade V injuries at CT. Six patients had associated injuries that required TAE. TAE of the spleen and associated injuries was successfully performed in all patients. The mean systolic blood pressure and shock index at the start of TAE were 84.2 mm Hg +/- 9.2 (standard deviation) and 1.46 +/- 0.30, respectively, and those at the completion of TAE were 132.1 mm Hg +/- 18.7 and 0.77 +/- 0.21, respectively (P < .001). The fluid infusion rate within 24 hours after the completion of TAE (132.1 mL/h +/- 71.1) was lower than that from the completion of the initial fluid resuscitation until the completion of TAE (1230.6 mL/h +/- 264.8) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: TAE for blunt splenic injury can be performed successfully even in hemodynamically unstable patients with a transient response to initial fluid resuscitation.     

Splenic trauma in adults: impact of CT grading on management

The impact of computed tomographic (CT) grading of splenic injury on case management was evaluated in 64 adult patients who underwent abdominal CT within 24 hours of blunt abdominal trauma. Severity of splenic parenchymal disruption and the presence of hemoperitoneum were each graded on a scale of 0-3 (maximal total score = 6). The splenic injury was graded retrospectively (stage 1) in 29 patients and prospectively (stage 2) in 35 patients. Patients who were treated surgically had a significantly higher score than those who were treated conservatively (3.8 vs 1.9 in stage 1, 4.1 vs 1.7 in stage 2, P less than .001 for both stages). Data analysis showed that patients with a splenic score of less than 2.5 can be treated safely without surgery, while patients with a splenic score of 2.5 or more are more likely to need surgery. In the latter group of patients, CT scoring did not change the operative rate (74% vs 75%) but did prompt earlier surgical intervention in stage 2. This significantly increased the rate at which spleen-saving operations were performed (from 21% to 67%, P less than .032) and the overall rate of splenic salvage. The CT scoring system used in this study appears to be a simple, reproducible, and useful method for quantitating splenic injury in blunt abdominal trauma.     

Blunt splenic trauma: delayed-phase CT for differentiation of active hemorrhage from contained vascular injury in patients

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate delayed-phase computed tomography (CT) in the differentiation of active splenic hemorrhage requiring emergent treatment from contained vascular injuries (pseudoaneurysms or arteriovenous fistulas) that can be treated electively or managed conservatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study; the informed consent requirement was waived. Forty-seven patients with blunt splenic injury diagnosed at CT after blunt abdominal trauma were evaluated. Abdominal and pelvic dual-phase CT was performed; images were obtained 60-70 seconds and 5 minutes after contrast material injection. Scans were reviewed in consensus by two radiologists. Splenic injuries were graded with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Splenic Injury Scale. Patients with intrasplenic hyperattenuating foci on portal venous phase images were classified as having active splenic hemorrhage (group 1) or a contained vascular injury (group 2) on the basis of delayed-phase imaging findings. Findings suggestive of active hemorrhage included areas that remained hyperattenuating or increased in size on delayed-phase images. The clinical outcome of these patients was determined by reviewing their medical records. Relationships between several factors were tested with the Fisher exact test, including (a) the presence or absence of hyperattenuating foci and management and (b) the presence of contained vascular injury or active extravasation and management. RESULTS: Portal venous phase CT revealed a focal high-attenuation parenchymal contrast material collection in 19 patients: nine patients were classified as group 1 and 10 were classified as group 2. All patients in group 1 underwent emergent splenectomy, and all patients in group 2 were initially treated without surgery. Significant differences in management were noted on the basis of whether hyperattenuating foci were seen on portal venous phase images (P < .001) and whether hyperattenuating foci seen at portal venous phase imaging were further characterized as active splenic hemorrhage or a contained vascular injury at delayed-phase CT (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In blunt splenic injury, delayed-phase CT helps differentiate patients with active splenic hemorrhage from those with contained vascular injuries.     

Visceral injury without hemoperitoneum: A limitation of screening abdominal sonography for trauma

Abdominal sonography for the detection of hemoperitoneum has become increasingly popular as a screening test for visceral injury after blunt trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency, severity, and clinical significance (outcome) of abdominal organ injuries that occur without hemoperitoneum on the initial evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma patients.During a 12-month period, 3392 blunt trauma patients were admitted to our center. Sonographic studies were performed as an initial screening evaluation to determine the presence of hemoperitoneum in 772 (22.7%) of these patients. Abdominal visceral injuries were verified by computed tomography (CT) or surgery in 196 (5.8%) of all blunt trauma admissions. Sonography, CT, and operative findings were reviewed to determine the presence or absence of hemoperitoneum in patients with abdominal injury. Patients with abdominal visceral injury without hemoperitoneum were further analyzed to identify the type of injury and the management required.A total of 246 abdominal injuries were identified in 196 patients. Fifty (26%) patients with abdominal visceral injuries diagnosed by admission CT scan had no evidence of hemoperitoneum. Admission sonography performed in 15 (30%) of these 50 patients also showed no evidence of hemoperitoneum. Visceral injuries detected by CT in the patients without hemoperitoneum included 22 of 100 splenic injuries (22%), 18 of 91 hepatic injuries (20%), 12 of 26 renal injuries (46%), and 1 of 9 mesenteric injuries (11%). Surgery was required to manage injuries in 10 of these patients.Up to 26% of blunt trauma patients with abdominal visceral injuries do not have associated hemoperitoneum identified on admission abdominal CT or sonography. Dependence on hemoperitoneum as the sole criterion of abdominal visceral injury after blunt trauma will result in falsely negative examinations and will miss potentially significant injuries.     

Blunt abdominal trauma in adults: role of CT in the diagnosis and management of visceral injuries Part 1: Liver and spleen

Computed tomography is now widely used in the initial diagnostic workup of adult trauma victims with suspected intra-abdominal injuries. We review the role of CT in the detection and management of blunt visceral injuries in two parts. In the first part we discuss general aspects of performing CT in the setting of abdominal trauma and the diagnostic findings of intra-abdominal hemorrhage and blunt hepatic and splenic injuries. Hepatic and splenic injuries can be detected by means of CT with a high accuracy. The vast majority of hepatic injuries can be successfully managed conservatively, even when CT demonstrates parenchymal damage of more than three segments and major hemoperitoneum. Delayed complications, e. g., formation of biloma or a false aneurysm, can be readily detected on repeat CT studies, although they are quite uncommon. The outcome of conservative treatment of splenic injuries remains unpredictable because delayed splenic rupture may occur even when initial CT shows only minor parenchymal lesions and little or no intraperitoneal hemorrhage. Received 22 July 1997; Revision received 16 October 1997; Accepted 23 October 1997     

Blunt trauma to the spleen: ultrasonographic findings

The spleen is the most frequently injured organ in adults who sustain blunt abdominal trauma. Splenic trauma accounts for approximately 25% to 30% of all intra-abdominal injuries. The management of splenic injury has undergone rapid change over the last decade, with increasing emphasis on splenic salvage and non-operative management. Identifying the presence and degree of splenic injury is critical in triaging the management of patients. Imaging is integral in the identification of splenic injuries, both at the time of injury and during follow-up. Although CT remains the gold standard in blunt abdominal trauma, US continues to play an important role in assessing the traumatized spleen. This pictorial review illustrates the various ultrasonographic appearances of the traumatized spleen. Correlation with other imaging is presented and complications that occur during follow-up are described.     

Traumatic injuries: role of imaging in the management of the polytrauma victim (conservative expectation)

Abdominal US and CT play an important role in the initial management of blunt trauma in adults. Ultrasound is an excellent method for detection of free intra-abdominal fluid. It is the modality of choice for initial screening and enables selection of hemodynamically unstable trauma victims with severe hemoperitoneum for immediate surgery. However, even in experienced hands, US is not sufficient to rule out organ injuries reliably. Computed tomography, and particularly multislice CT (MSCT), has several major advantages over US and is currently unsurpassed for the detection of blunt visceral injuries in the abdomen. Computed tomography has a high sensitivity for the detection of parenchymal splenic and hepatic injuries. Injuries of the gastrointestinal tract may be detected with good sensitivity provided that adequate examination technique and careful diagnostic interpretation are combined. The value of CT-based injury-grading systems for predicting the outcome of conservative treatment remains unproven; however, demonstration of direct vascular injuries with CT, e.g., the intrasplenic "contrast blush" sign, may indicate a high likelihood that conservative treatment will fail, thus warranting angiographic embolization or surgery. Monitoring of conservatively treated trauma victims by means of repeat CT studies enables early detection of a variety of delayed, clinically silent complications of trauma, e.g., posttraumatic biloma or bowel devascularization. Catheter angiography may be reserved to selected cases with vascular injuries proven on CT.     

Splenic injury diagnosed with CT: US follow-up and healing rate in children and adolescents.

PURPOSE: To determine if pediatric splenic injury healing observed during ultrasonography (US) is related to the computed tomographic (CT) grade of injury severity, to review any delayed complications, and to formulate a grade-specific timetable for follow-up imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight children and adolescents with CT-documented blunt splenic injury underwent US at approximate 6-week intervals to document injury healing (normal parenchyma or linear echogenic "scar"). Medical records of those not followed up to complete healing were reviewed. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were followed up to complete injury healing: 14 of injury grade 1 (mean, 7 weeks; range, 4-12 weeks), 24 of injury grade 2 (mean, 9.5 weeks; range, 6-17 weeks), and 10 of injury grade 3 (mean, 16 weeks; range, 6-29 weeks). The difference in mean time to healing among all grades was significant (P < .02). Only two cysts were found; one decreased in size over time. No complications occurred in the 68 study patients. CONCLUSION: The time course to US-documented healing of blunt pediatric splenic injury is related to injury severity. This information can be used to tailor follow-up imaging and provide cost savings.     

成人钝性脾损伤非手术治疗失败的危险因素研究

目的：探讨成人钝性脾损伤非手术治疗（ NOM ）失败的原因和危险因素。方法回顾性分析2011年11月～2014年3月间收治的110例钝性脾损伤成人患者,其中58例最初接受了非手术治疗,其中男性36例,女性22例;年龄17～89岁,平均（43.4±15.1）岁。根据治疗后期是否剖腹手术分为非手术治疗失败组和非手术治疗成功组,采用单因素分析和多因素Logistic回归法分析影响脾损伤非手术治疗结果的相关因素,确定脾损伤非手术治疗失败的独立危险因素。结果非手术治疗应用率为52.7％（58／110）,其中失败率为24.14％（14／58）,没有死亡发生。非手术治疗失败的主要原因：早期为活动性出血、早期再出血和脾损伤分级的误判,晚期为迟发性脾脏包膜下血肿破裂。单因素分析显示成人钝性脾损伤非手术治疗失败的相关因素有休克指数、腹腔积血程度、美国创伤外科协会（ AAST ）脾损伤分级、损伤严重程度评分（ISS）、新的损伤严重程度评分（NISS）、输注红细胞（RBC）量、住院时间（P＜0.05）。多因素Logistic回归分析发现AAST脾损伤分级≥3、中量或大量腹腔积血、输注RBC＞4U为NOM失败的独立危险因素。结论中量或大量腹腔积血,脾损伤≥3级和输注RBC＞4U为NOM失败的高危因素。     

Nonoperative management of hepatic trauma

In an attempt to determine whether selective, nonoperative management of hepatic trauma might be efficacious, a retrospective review of liver injuries was undertaken. Of the 48 patients with liver injuries identified, there were 34 men and 14 women with an average age of 28.5 years. Mechanism of injury consisted of blunt trauma in 23 patients, stab wounds in 14 patients, and 11 patients had gunshot wounds. There were 12 grade I injuries, 15 grade II injuries, 17 grade III injuries, 2 grade IV injuries, and 1 grade V injury. Diagnosis of liver trauma was made at the time of exploratory laparotomy in 15 patients and suggested by abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan in 18 patients; the remaining 15 patients had a positive peritoneal lavage which led to exploratory laparotomy. Following blunt trauma, 14 patients, all of whom underwent diagnostic abdominal CT scans which confirmed hepatic injury, had nonoperative treatment. All patients who received nonoperative management maintained stable vital signs and only five required transfusion. None of the patients who were treated nonoperatively developed complications or required delayed laparotomy. There were no deaths in this group. Of the 34 patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy, 19 required either no treatment or minor hepatorrhaphy. However, 17 of 25 patients with penetrating wounds had associated abdominal injuries which required operative treatment. Based on the information obtained in this review, it is recommended that stable patients with isolated hepatic injuries, secondary to blunt trauma confirmed by CT scan, may be managed nonoperatively. Due to the high frequency of associated injuries found in patients with penetrating trauma, nonoperative therapy is not advised.     

The role of arterial embolization in blunt splenic injury

Purpose

The aim of study was to evaluate the results of our experience with transarterial embolization based on a modified algorithm in patients with splenic injury.

Materials and methods

We collected data of patients admitted to our hospital from January 2006 to August 2008 for blunt splenic injury. During this period, 46 patients were admitted for splenic trauma, of whom 17 were treated surgically, 15 conservatively and 14 with percutaneous embolisation (13 men, mean age 44.8, mean injury severity score 18.5, six with grade IV and eight with contrast blush). Patients in shock were referred for laparotomy and splenectomy, whereas those who were haemodynamically stable or responsive to fluid resuscitation were further evaluated with computed tomography (CT). In the presence of imaging evidence of splenic injury ranging from grade I to grade III (n=15) a conservative approach was adopted, whereas haemodynamically unstable patients with grade V injury (n=17) were treated with splenectomy. Embolisation was performed in 14 patients with grade IV injury or in the event of contrast extravasation, regardless of injury grade. In patients with diffuse organ damage, we embolised the main splenic artery, whereas in the case of localised injury, embolisation was selective.

Results

Proximal embolization was required in eight cases and distal coil embolization in six. In 13 cases, we placed magnetic-resonance-compatible coils 4?C6 mm in diameter; only one patient was treated with gel-foam injection. Immediate technical success was achieved in all cases. In 13/14 patients (92.9%), no periprocedural complications were observed, whereas the remaining patient underwent splenectomy within 24 h due to recurrent bleeding.

Conclusions

On the basis of our algorithm, it is possible to reach a quick decision on the most appropriate treatment for patients presenting with blunt abdominal trauma, and splenic artery embolization seems to offer a reliable option in those with high-grade splenic injury or active bleeding.     

创伤性脾破裂非手术治疗探讨

目的探讨闭合性腹部外伤致脾破裂非于术治疗的可行性。方法对我院2003-2006年间收治的27例外伤性脾破裂患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果8例患者行非手术治疗，占同期脾破裂患者的29．6％。其中1例非手术治疗失败后急症行脾切除＋小肠破裂修补手术。7例非手术治疗患者均痊愈出院，平均住院时间为12天，出院随访3个月均恢复良好。结论选择合适的脾破裂患者行非手术治疗，是安全、有效的。     

Blunt splenic injuries: nonsurgical treatment with CT, arteriography, and transcatheter arterial embolization of the splenic artery

The management and outcome of blunt splenic injury diagnosed with computed tomography (CT) were studied in 44 consecutive patients who were hemodynamically stable or whose condition stabilized rapidly with resuscitation. Celiac and splenic arteriography was used in the triage of patients for nonsurgical treatment or for hemostasis. Patients without arterial extravasation of contrast material at arteriography were treated with bed rest only (group 1, n = 19); patients who had such extravasation were treated with bed rest after percutaneous transcatheter coil occlusion of the proximal splenic artery (group 2, n = 17). Abdominal exploration without angiography or embolotherapy was begun if the patient or attending surgeon did not agree with the treatment protocol (group 3, n = 8). Treatment with bed rest alone was successful in 18 patients. Clinical control of hemorrhage was accomplished in all patients in group 2 and one patient in group 1. Thus, exploratory laparotomy was avoided in 34 of 36 patients (94%) in whom nonoperative management was attempted; splenic salvage was achieved in 35 of 36 patients (97%).     

Hepatic and splenic injury in children: role of CT in the decision for laparotomy

Clinical and radiographic records of 274 children who were examined with abdominal computed tomography (CT) after blunt abdominal trauma were retrospectively evaluated to test the hypothesis that CT can assist in decisions to perform laparotomy in children with hepatic or splenic injury. CT demonstrated parenchymal injuries in 36 patients (13%) or 20 livers and 21 spleens. Injury to these organs was categorized as minor (39%), moderate (39%), and severe (21%) according to an assessment of the percentage of parenchymal involvement. Hemoperitoneum was detected in 27 of 36 patients (75%). One of 13 (4.7%) with a moderate to large splenic injury underwent splenorrhaphy because of persistent bleeding. One of 12 (5%) with a moderate to large hepatic injury required late operative intervention due to a large necrotic segment. Both children had a large amount of peritoneal fluid. Two of 16 patients (13%) with moderate to large hemoperitoneum required surgery for liver or splenic injury. The decision for laparotomy should not be based on the extent of injury as shown at CT but on the physiologic condition of the child.     

Optimizing multidetector CT for visualization of splenic vascular injury. Validation by splenic arteriography in blunt abdominal trauma patients

Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury is the treatment of choice in hemodynamically stable patients. Detection of vascular injury by multidetector CT (MDCT) is the most significant factor predicting the need for endovascular treatment. This study evaluated the timing of the appearance of vascular lesions during angiography. Images from 20 patients embolized for pseudoaneurysms (PSA) were evaluated. Angiograms were reviewed for phase and timing of PSA. Admission MDCT was reviewed for injury grade and PSA. Initial MDCT evaluation indicated grade III and IV splenic injuries in 9 and 11 patients, respectively. PSA was seen on MDCT in 14/20 (70%) patients. Time from opacification of the aorta to vascular injury was 1.32 s for arterial phase injuries compared with 2.05 s for postcapillary injuries (P = 0.097). Angiography demonstrated 15 vascular injuries during the arterial and 5 in the venous phase. Of injuries seen during arterial phase angiography, 10/15 (66%) were identified on MDCT. Of the five injuries that exhibited postcapillary-phase findings, 4/5 (80%) demonstrated PSA (P = 0.5). Vascular lesions are a better indicator of subsequent clinical deterioration than splenic injury grade. PSAs are more frequently seen in postcapillary vascular injuries than arterial phase lesions with the current timing of MDCT. In a subset of patients in whom splenic injury grades III and IV warrant angiography, PSAs are not initially demonstrated on MDCT. Therefore, alteration of MDCT timing parameters to better correlate with arterial phase angiography may improve initial diagnosis of vascular injury.