Popliteal vein thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation of greater saphenous vein for varicose vein

Percutaneous endovenous techniques, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), have become the preferred method for treatment for varicose veins associated with great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency. Reports have shown safety and efficacy of these techniques with relatively few complications. Deep venous thrombosis after RFA is rare and usually involves extension of thrombus from great saphenous vein to common femoral vein, hence the requirement for postoperative ultrasound. We report a case of symptomatic popliteal vein thrombosis after RFA of GSV requiring anti-coagulation.     

Endovenous laser therapy and radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein: analysis of early efficacy and complications

BACKGROUND: Endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are new, minimally invasive percutaneous endovenous techniques for ablation of the incompetent great saphenous vein (GSV). We have performed both procedures at the Mayo Clinic during two different consecutive periods. At the time of this report, no single-institution report has compared RFA with EVLT in the management of saphenous reflux. To evaluate early results, we reviewed saphenous closure rates and complications of both procedures. METHODS: Between June 1, 2001, and June 25, 2004, endovenous GSV ablation was performed on 130 limbs in 92 patients. RFA was the procedure of choice in 53 limbs over the first 24-month period of the study. This technique was subsequently replaced by EVLT, which was performed on the successive 77 limbs. The institutional review board approved the retrospective chart review of patients who underwent saphenous ablation. According to the CEAP classification, 124 limbs were C2-C4, and six were C5-C6. Concomitant procedures included avulsion phlebectomy in 126 limbs, subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery in 10, and small saphenous vein ablation in 4 (EVLT in 1, ligation in 1, stripping in 2). Routine postoperative duplex scanning was initiated at our institution only after recent publications reported thrombotic complications following RFA. This was obtained in 65 limbs (50%) (54/77 [70%] of the EVLT group and 11/53 [20.8%] of the RFA group) between 1 and 23 days (median, 7 days). RESULTS: Occlusion of the GSV was confirmed in 93.9% of limbs studied (94.4% in the EVLT [51/54] and 90.9% in the RFA group [10/11]). The distance between the GSV thrombus and the common femoral vein (CFV) ranged from -20 mm (protrusion in the CFV) to +50 mm (median, 9.5 mm) and was similar between the two groups (median, 9.5 mm vs 10 mm). Thrombus protruded into the lumen of the CFV in three limbs (2.3%) after EVLT. All three patients were treated with anticoagulation. One received a temporary inferior vena cava filter because of a floating thrombus in the CFV. Duplex follow-up scans of these three patients performed at 12, 14, and 95 days, respectively, showed that the thrombus previously identified at duplex scan was no longer protruding into the CFV. No cases of pulmonary embolism occurred. The distance between GSV thrombus and the saphenofemoral junction after EVLT was shorter in older patients (P = .006, r(2) = 0.13). The overall complication rate was 15.4% (20.8% in the EVLT and 7.6% in the RFA group, P =.049) and included superficial thrombophlebitis in 4, excessive pain in 6 (3 in the RFA group), hematoma in 1, edema in 3 (1 in the RFA group), and cellulitis in 2. Except for two of the three patients with thrombus extension into the CFV, none of these adverse effects required hospitalization. CONCLUSION: GSV occlusion was achieved in >90% of cases after both EVLT and RFA at 1 month. We observed three cases of thrombus protrusion into the CFV after EVLT and recommend early duplex scanning in all patients after endovenous saphenous ablations. DVT prophylaxis may be considered in patients >50 years old. Long-term follow-up and comparison with standard GSV stripping are required to confirm the durability of these endovenous procedures.     

Deep venous thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation of greater saphenous vein: a word of caution

PURPOSE: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the greater saphenous vein (GSV; "closure") is a relatively new option for treatment of venous reflux. However, our initial enthusiasm for this minimally invasive technique has been tempered by our preliminary experience with its potentially lethal complication, deep venous thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: Seventy-three lower extremities were treated in 66 patients with GSV reflux, between April 2003 and February 2004. There were 48 (73%) female patients and 18 (27%) male patients, with ages ranging from 26 to 88 years (mean, 62 +/- 14 years). RFA was combined with stab avulsion of varicosities in 55 (75%) patients and subfascial ligation of perforator veins in 6 (8%) patients. An ATL HDI 5000 scanner with linear 7-4 MHz probe and the SonoCT feature was used for GSV mapping and procedure guidance in all procedures. GSV diameter determined the size of the RFA catheter used. Veins less than 8 mm in diameter were treated with a 6F catheter (n = 54); an 8F catheter was used for veins greater than 8 mm in diameter (n = 19). The GSV was cannulated at the knee level. The tip of the catheter was positioned within 1 cm of the origin of the inferior epigastric vein (first GSV tributary). All procedures were carried out according to manufacturer guidelines. RESULTS: All patients underwent venous duplex ultrasound scanning 2 to 30 days (mean, 10 +/- 6 days) after the procedure. The duplex scans documented occlusion of the GSV in 70 limbs (96%). In addition, DVT was found in 12 limbs (16%). Eleven patients (92%) had an extension of the occlusive clot filling the treated proximal GSV segment, with a floating tail beyond the patent inferior epigastric vein into the common femoral vein. Another patient developed acute occlusive clots in the calf muscle (gastrocnemius) veins. Eight patients were readmitted and received anticoagulation therapy. Four patients were treated with enoxaparin on an ambulatory basis. None of these patients had pulmonary embolism. Initially 3 patients with floating common femoral vein clots underwent inferior vena cava filter placement. Of the 19 limbs treated with the 8F RFA catheter, GSV clot extension developed in 5 (26%), compared with 7 of 54 (13%) limbs treated with the 6F RFA catheter (P =.3). No difference was found between the occurrence of DVT in patients who underwent the combined procedure (RFA and varicose vein excision) compared with patients who underwent GSV RFA alone (P =.7). No statistically significant differences were found in age or gender of patients with or without postoperative DVT (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent combined GSV RFA and varicose vein excision did not demonstrate a higher occurrence of postoperative DVT compared with patients who underwent RFA alone. Early postoperative duplex scans are essential, and should be mandatory in all patients undergoing RFA of the GSV.     

Proximal extent of pelvic vein thrombosis and its association with pulmonary embolism

OBJECTIVE: Conventional methods such as duplex ultrasound scanning do not provide accurate information about proximal extension of pelvic vein thrombosis. We evaluated proximal extent of thrombus toward pelvic veins with magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) proximal to the inguinal ligament on the basis of duplex ultrasound scans. In addition, frequency of pulmonary embolism (PE) and early (4 weeks) clinical outcome were evaluated. METHODS: Two hundred twelve patients with acute symptomatic DVT proximal to the inguinal ligament, diagnosed at duplex ultrasound scanning, were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal and pelvic veins, as well as lung scintigraphy to detect the presence of pulmonary embolism. RESULTS: In 24 of 212 patients (11%), thrombus was restricted to the femoral vein. The thrombus extended into iliac veins in 142 patients (67%) and into the inferior vena cava in 46 patients (22%). The frequency of PE was not associated with the most proximal extension of thrombus (P =.61). No patients died as a consequence of thromboembolic events. CONCLUSIONS: Extension of DVT into the inferior vena cava occurs relatively frequently. In our patients this finding was not associated with higher risk for PE compared with DVT of the femoral or iliac veins.     

Duplex scanning in the diagnosis of acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity

In a prospective study the value of duplex scanning in the diagnosis of acute femoro-popliteal thrombosis was compared to conventional contrast venography (CV) as a gold standard. A total of 126 legs in 117 patients suspected of having deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) were examined with both methods. CV and duplex scanning were diagnostic in 98.5 and 97%, respectively. Femoro-popliteal thrombosis was present in 64 legs (prevalence 54%). The sensitivity and specificity of duplex scanning were 90.6% and 94.6%, respectively. A marked improvement in sensitivity from 83.3 to 97% and overall accuracy from 88.7 to 96% was noticed between the first and second half of the study period. Of the individual duplex criteria in the diagnosis of DVT, abnormal vessel wall compressibility was the most accurate. The Doppler measurements however allow evaluation of venous areas difficult to assess with B-mode and add discrimination between partial or total vein occlusion. Duplex scanning is more accurate compared to CV in grading the anatomical extent of thrombosis. Agreement between venography and duplex scanning was found in 75% of the vein segments, in about 20% CV suggested more thrombus formation compared to duplex scanning. Thrombus in the deep femoral vein was documented by duplex scanning in 24 patients including two cases of isolated deep femoral vein thrombosis. Venography failed to visualise the deep femoral vein with sufficient diagnostic accuracy in 88% of the patients vs. 8.5% with duplex scanning. Duplex scanning is an accurate non-invasive test in the diagnosis of acute femoro-popliteal thrombosis and superior to CV in the detection of non-occlusive and deep femoral vein thrombosis.     

Is anticoagulation indicated for asymptomatic postoperative calf vein thrombosis?

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of anticoagulation on the incidence of thrombotic propagation and pulmonary embolism in patients with calf vein thrombosis after total hip or total knee arthroplasty. Patients undergoing arthroplasties had prospective surveillance for postoperative deep vein thrombosis by both bilateral contrast venography and venous duplex scanning. Calf vein thrombosis was documented by venography in 42 patients (50 limbs), including 29 of 253 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (11.4%) and 13 of 99 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (13%). Of patients on whom follow-up duplex scans were performed, heparin followed by warfarin anticoagulation was used in 11 (13 limbs) and withheld in 21 (25 limbs). Propagation of thrombosis to the popliteal or superficial femoral vein or both was detected by serial duplex scanning in 3 of 13 treated limbs (23%) and 2 of 25 untreated limbs (8%), (p = 0.43). All thrombus propagations were detected within 2 weeks of the operative procedure. There were no pulmonary emboli or deaths. Propagation of asymptomatic calf vein thrombosis after arthroplasty was not influenced by anticoagulation, suggesting that postoperative calf vein thrombosis need not be routinely treated. Serial venous duplex scanning is useful to identify the occasional patient in whom thrombotic propagation requiring anticoagulation develops.     

Operative management of greater saphenous thrombophlebitis involving the saphenofemoral junction.

Forty-three consecutive patients with greater saphenous vein (GSV) thrombosis extending to the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) were treated. Twenty-three patients had extension of thrombus into the common femoral vein (CFV). Twenty patients had thrombus extending to but not within the CFV. Symptoms, risk factors, and physical examination were not predictive of CFV thrombus extension. When compared with the operative record, duplex scans accurately located the extent of the thrombosis 100% of the time. Forty-one surgical procedures were performed. No patients had pulmonary emboli during the procedures. Thirty-seven patients were treated as outpatients or were discharged within 3 days of their surgical procedures. The two patients who did not undergo operative procedures in this series had complete occlusion of the CFV with extension into the external iliac vein. Thrombus within 3 cm of the SFJ is an indication for surgical intervention. Disconnection of the GSV from the CFV prevents extension of the thrombus, and a limited CFV thrombectomy can be performed when necessary. This is considerably more cost-effective than treatment with anticoagulation.     

Pitfalls in lower extremity venous duplex scanning

Results of scans performed on 1074 patients over an 18-month period were evaluated to define the limitations of lower extremity venous duplex scanning. Eighty-four patients had confirmatory phlebography performed within 24 hours of their venous duplex scanning. In 71 patients scans were considered diagnostic (sensitivity 91%, specificity 95%). Eighteen studies (13 equivocal, 5 misinterpretations) were scrutinized to determine the limitations of venous duplex scanning compared to phlebography and are the focus of this analysis. Seven patients had phlebograms documenting only infrapopliteal thrombus, seven had normal phlebographic findings, and four had findings consistent with chronic thrombosis. In the seven patients with infrapopliteal thrombus, four had normal imaging outcomes but abnormal Doppler flow patterns, whereas three had both normal imaging results and flow patterns. All four patients with chronic thrombosis had identifiable thrombus and abnormal flow patterns by venous duplex scanning, but in each case thrombus age was indeterminate. Of the seven patients with normal phlebographic results, five had incompressible segments of the superficial femoral vein on imaging, one had abnormal Doppler flow without visualized thrombus and without apparent reason, one had venous duplex scanning visualized thrombus with a normal outcome on phlebography. These data suggest that the diagnostic yield of lower extremity venous duplex scanning may be improved by (1) meticulous infrapopliteal vein examination, (2) better estimation of the age of the thrombotic process, and (3) recognizing segmental incompressibility of the superficial femoral vein within the adductor canal as a normal finding especially in the absence of abnormal Doppler flow or imaged thrombus.     

Endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein may avert phlebectomy for branch varicose veins

BACKGROUND: Endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein (GSV) may be performed simultaneously with stab phlebectomy of branch varicose veins or as a stand-alone procedure. A clinical approach of performing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) alone as initial treatment for varicose veins was reviewed. METHODS: Patients with duplex ultrasound-documented reflux in the GSV and CEAP clinical stage 2 to 6 were selected for RFA. Patients were examined within a week preoperatively with duplex ultrasound imaging. Patients were seen within a week postoperatively and again at 2 to 3 months to ascertain if further treatment was required. A retrospective review of the initial 184 procedures in a series from June 2002 through February 2005 was performed, allowing for a 9-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Three procedures were performed under general anesthesia and 181 with intravenous sedation and tumescent anesthesia. Postoperative duplex scans showed total occlusion or partial patency of <10 cm in 155 limbs. Seven (4.5%) had concomitant stab phlebectomy, seven subsequently had sclerotherapy, and 39 (25.2%) underwent subsequent stab phlebectomy of persistent symptomatic varicosities. In 101 limbs (65.1%), symptoms resolved and had no further therapy, and 24 limbs had a GSV that was patent for >10 cm on postoperative duplex imaging. Nine limbs had no further therapy (37.5%), eight (33.3%) had subsequent stab phlebectomy, and three had stripping of the GSV and stab phlebectomy. Four limbs had a redo RFA, four limbs had an aborted RFA procedure, and one limb was lost to follow-up. Failure of total GSV occlusion was more often associated with use of a 6F catheter. Complications were generally mild, and there was no postoperative deep vein thrombosis. CONCLUSION: Endovenous ablation of the GSV can be performed safely and effectively as the initial treatment for lower extremity varicose veins. Because most patients show clinical improvement after RFA, an algorithm of reassessment of the limb and branch varicose veins several months post-RFA allows most patients to defer stab phlebectomy.     

Pulmonary embolism after endovenous thermal ablation of the saphenous vein

Pulmonary embolism (PE) after venous procedures is fortunately rare. Our goal was to analyze the data of patients who developed PE after endovenous thermal ablation and phlebectomy for varicose veins and to review the literature on this subject. We report on three patients who developed PE after radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein and mini phlebectomy for symptomatic primary lower-extremity varicose veins. Early postoperative duplex scans confirmed successful closure of the great saphenous vein in all. One patient presented with chest pain and dyspnea, one with blood-tinged sputum, and the third with symptoms of saphenous thrombophlebitis. Two patients had PE from the saphenous vein thrombus and the third had gastrocnemius vein thrombosis extending into the popliteal vein. One had previous deep vein thrombosis. Computed tomography of the chest confirmed PE in all. Two patients were treated with anticoagulation, but the third patient with small PE declined such treatment. One patient underwent temporary inferior vena cava filter placement because of recurrent PE. In conclusion, PE is very rare but it can occur after endovenous thermal ablation of lower-extremity varicose veins. Selective thrombosis prophylaxis and preoperative counseling of the patients about signs and symptoms of deep vein thrombosis and PE are warranted for early recognition and rapid treatment.     

Perioperative asymptomatic venous thrombosis: role of duplex scanning versus venography

We compared combined B-mode/Doppler (duplex ultrasonic scanning and venography in routine preoperative and postoperative screening for major proximal deep vein thrombosis in 78 patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty. Of 309 extremity examinations, duplex scanning had an overall sensitivity of 85.7% (12/14) and a specificity of 97.3% (287/295). The preoperative prevalence and postoperative incidence of major deep vein thrombosis were 2.5% and 14.1% of patients, respectively, despite intensive mechanical and pharmacologic prophylaxis. In addition, venography documented a preoperative prevalence and postoperative incidence of isolated calf deep vein thrombosis in 2.5% and 16.7% of patients, respectively. Whereas such disease extended proximally even in the absence of anticoagulation in only 18% of patients studied by serial duplex scans, calf deep vein thrombosis accounted for the only two instances of pulmonary embolism in this study. There were no deaths related to pulmonary embolism. This study suggests that duplex scanning is useful in screening for perioperative deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty, which carries a significant risk of venous thromboembolism despite routine prophylaxis.     

A prospective study of a focused, surgeon-performed ultrasound examination for the detection of occult common femoral vein thrombosis in critically ill patients

HYPOTHESIS: A focused, surgeon-performed ultrasound examination of the common femoral veins is an accurate screening tool for the detection of common femoral vein thrombosis in high-risk, critically ill patients. DESIGN: A prospective study using a focused ultrasound examination for findings consistent with deep vein thrombosis of the common femoral veins. The results of these examinations were compared with those of duplex imaging or computed tomographic venography studies. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit. PATIENTS: All critically ill patients who were admitted to the surgical intensive care unit and considered to be at high risk for the development of deep vein thrombosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Presence of deep vein thrombosis in the common femoral veins. RESULTS: During a 16-month period, surgeons performed 306 ultrasound examinations on 220 critically ill surgical patients. The results included 295 true negative, 9 true positive, 1 false negative, and 1 false positive, yielding a 90.0% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, and 99.3% accuracy. CONCLUSION: A focused, surgeon-performed ultrasound examination is a rapid and accurate screening method to detect common femoral vein thrombosis in critically ill patients as well as to examine those patients in whom pulmonary embolism is strongly suspected.     

Valvular reflux after deep vein thrombosis: incidence and time of occurrence.

From December 1986 to December 1990, 268 patients with acute deep vein thrombosis were studied in our laboratory. From this group 107 patients (123 legs with deep vein thrombosis) were placed in our long-term follow-up program. The documentation of valvular reflux and its site was demonstrated by duplex scanning. The duplex studies were done at intervals of 1 and 7 days, 1 month, every 3 months for the first year, and then yearly thereafter. The mean follow-up time for these patients was 341 days. In addition, reflux was evaluated in 502 patients with negative duplex study results and no previous history of deep vein thrombosis or chronic venous insufficiency. In the patients with acute deep vein thrombosis, valvular incompetence was noted in 17 limbs (14%) at the time of the initial study. Reflux was absent in 106 limbs (86%). In this last group reflux developed in 17% of the limbs by day 7. By the end of the first month, 37% demonstrated reflux. By the end of the first year, more than two thirds of the involved limbs had developed valvular incompetence. The distribution of reflux at the end of the first year of follow-up was the following: (1) popliteal vein, 58%; (2) superficial femoral vein, 37%; (3) greater saphenous vein, 25%; and (4) posterior tibial vein, 18%. Reflux seems to be more frequent in the segments previously affected with deep vein thrombosis. Among cases where segments were initially affected with thrombi, after 1 year the incidence of reflux was 53%, 44%, 59%, and 33% for the common femoral vein, superficial femoral, popliteal vein, and posterior tibial vein, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

How often is deep venous reflux eliminated after saphenous vein ablation?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep venous reflux resolution after great saphenous vein surgery has been reported, but the studies evaluated mainly patients with deep segmental reflux. We prospectively analyzed the effects of greater saphenous vein ablation on coexisting primary deep axial venous reflux compared with segmental venous reflux.Patients and methods Between February 1997 and June 2001, patients with primary deep venous reflux scheduled for greater saphenous vein surgery were included in the study. Limbs of patients with a history of deep venous thrombosis, thrombophlebitis, trauma, and orthopedic or venous surgery were excluded. After surgery, duplex scanning was repeated and patients were examined for persistent deep venous reflux. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (38 limbs) were followed up with duplex scanning. Follow-up ranged from 2 weeks to 38 months. Preoperative axial deep reflux was present in 17 extremities, and segmental reflux was present in 21. The total number of incompetent segments was 59. Overall reflux abolishment rate was similar in extremities with axial and segmental reflux (30% vs 36%; P >.05). When segments were analyzed individually, abolishment of superficial femoral vein reflux was observed more often in extremities with segmental reflux than those with axial reflux (odds ratio, 4). In the extremities where deep reflux was not abolished with greater saphenous vein ablation, degree of reflux did not change significantly (P >.1). Duplex scanning was performed more than once during follow-up in 9 patients. In 3 of these patients reflux resolved by the second follow-up evaluation, and in 2 reflux was decreased at the second and third follow-up evaluations. CONCLUSION: In patients with concomitant deep and superficial venous reflux, saphenous vein ablation results in resolution of deep reflux in about a third of patients. Superficial femoral vein reflux is seldom corrected in limbs with axial reflux compared with those limbs with segmental reflux. To appreciate the effects of greater saphenous vein ablation, longer follow-up may be needed.     

Femoral venous reflux abolished by greater saphenous vein stripping

Preoperative venous duplex scanning has revealed unexpected deep venous incompetence in patients with apparently only varicose veins. Acting on the hypothesis that the deep vein reflux was secondary to deep vein dilation caused by reflux volume, the following was done. Between July 1990 and April 1993, 29 limbs in 21 patients (16 females) were examined by color-flow duplex imaging to determine valve closure by the method of van Bemmelen. Instrumentation included high-resolution ATL-9 venous interrogation using a pneumatic cuff deflation stimulus of reflux in the standing, nonweight-bearing limb. All limbs showed greater saphenous vein reflux. Twenty-nine showed superficial femoral vein reflux and of these three showed popliteal vein reflux. Duplex testing was performed by a certified vascular technologist whose interpretation was blinded as to the results of clinical examination and grading of the severity of venous insufficiency. Surgery was performed on an outpatient basis under general anesthesia using groin-to-knee removal of the greater saphenous vein by the vein inversion technique of Van Der Strict. Stab avulsion of varicose tributary veins was accomplished during the same period of anesthesia. In 27 of 29 limbs with preoperative femoral reflux, that reflux was abolished by greater saphenous stripping. In patients with popliteal reflux both femoral and popliteal reflux was abolished. Improvement of deep venous hemodynamics by ablation of superficial reflux supports the reflux circuit theory of venous overload. Furthermore, preoperative evaluation of venous hemodynamics by duplex scanning appears to provide useful pre- and postoperative information regarding venous insufficiency in individual patients.Presented at the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Southern California Vascular Surgical Society, Coronado, Calif, September 17–19, 1993.     

Progression of superficial venous thrombosis to deep vein thrombosis

Purpose: We have evaluated the progression of isolated superficial venous thrombosis to deep vein thrombosis in patients with no initial deep venous involvement.Methods: Patients with thrombosis isolated to the superficial veins with no evidence of deep venous involvement by duplex ultrasound examination were evaluated by follow-up duplex ultrasonography to determine the incidence of disease progression into the deep veins of the lower extremities. Initial and follow-up duplex scans evaluated the femoropopliteal and deep calf veins in their entirety; follow-up studies were done at an average of 6.3 days, ranging from 2 to 10 days.Results: From January 1992 to January 1996, 263 patients were identified with isolated superficial venous thrombosis. Thirty (11%) patients had documented progression to deep venous involvement. The most common site of deep vein involvement was progression of disease from the greater saphenous vein in the thigh into the common femoral vein (21 patients, 70%), with 18 of these extensions noted to be nonocclusive and 12 having a free-floating component. Three patients had extended above-knee saphenous vein thrombi through thigh perforators to occlude the femoral vein in the thigh, three patients had extended below-knee saphenous disease into the popliteal vein, and three patients had extended below-knee thrombi into the tibioperoneal veins with calf perforators. At the time of the follow-up examination all 30 patients were being treated without anticoagulation.Conclusions: Proximal saphenous vein thrombosis should be treated with anticoagulation or at least followed by serial duplex ultrasound evaluation so that definitive therapy may be initiated, if progression is noted. More distal superficial venous thrombosis should be carefully followed clinically and repeat duplex ultrasound scans performed, if progression is noted or patient symptoms worsen. (J Vasc Surg 1996;24:745-9.)     

Clinical significance of free-floating venous thrombi

To evaluate the fate of free-floating venous thrombi, venous duplex scans of 5238 consecutive lower extremities over a 2 1/2 year period were reviewed. Acute deep venous thrombosis was found in 732 cases. Eighty-two free-floating deep venous thrombi were diagnosed in 73 of these patients. Nine of 72 patients (13%) had pulmonary emboli as diagnosed by ventilation perfusion scanning or pulmonary angiography or both. Seven of these patients (78%) had a pulmonary embolus before the initial duplex scan. Two (22%) had a pulmonary embolus after the diagnosis of free-floating thrombus. Thirty-three of 73 patients (45%) had follow-up of free-floating thrombi by duplex scanning performed in the acute period (less than 30 days): 18 (55%) showed attachment of the free-floating thrombus, three (9%) showed progression in size of the free-floating tail, and eight (24%) showed decrease in size or resolution of the free-floating thrombus. Four (12%) showed persistent thrombus without evidence of resolution, propagation, or attachment. In conclusion, free-floating venous thrombi occurred in 10% of cases of acute deep venous thrombosis. Only 13% of free-floating thrombi were associated with clinically significant pulmonary emboli, confirmed by ventilation perfusion scanning. Usually the embolus occurred before diagnosis of free-floating thrombus. Most free-floating thrombi followed noninvasively by duplex scanning do not embolize, but rather they become attached to the vein wall or resolve.     

Pattern and distribution of thrombi in acute venous thrombosis.

The location and extent of thrombosis in the deep venous system will determine immediate and long-term outcome. During the past 3 years, we have studied by duplex scanning 833 patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis. In this group, 209 patients (25%) had a positive study. The findings relative to location and extent of involvement are as follows. (1) The right leg was involved in 35% of patients, the left leg in 48%. Bilateral involvement was noted in 17%. (2) The veins most frequently affected by deep vein thrombosis were as follows: superficial femoral in 74%, popliteal in 73%, common femoral in 58%, posterior tibial in 40%, deep femoral in 29%, greater saphenous in 19%, and the inferior vena cava in 2%; multisegment involvement was common. (3) Total occlusion was present in 82% of the patients with deep vein thrombosis, and partial occlusion in 18%. (4) Isolated occlusion of single veins was uncommon. (5) The proximal (above-knee) area was involved in 95% of the cases with deep vein thrombosis, and the calf in 40% of the cases. Isolated calf deep vein thrombosis was found in 6% of the cases with right leg involvement and in 3% for the left. (6) Total leg involvement (iliocaval, femoropopliteal, and calf) occurred in 10% of the patients. Our data confirm the fallibility of the clinical diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. The frequent involvement of both limbs stresses the importance of not examining just the symptomatic limb. Proximal venous thrombosis (popliteal to inferior vena cava) is much more common than isolated calf vein thrombosis as a cause for symptoms and the referral for study.     

Diagnosis and therapy of progressive thrombophlebitis of epifascial leg veins

INTRODUCTION: The thrombophlebitis is generally regarded as a harmless disease. However, the progressive varicophlebitis represents a subgroup of thrombophlebitis in which the proximal portion of the thrombus can ascend into the deep vein system with the complication of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a period of 15 months ten patients were operated upon in whom a progressive varicophlebitis was diagnosed with color-flow duplex scanning. Eight of them were men, two were women. The average age was 56 years. RESULTS: Nine patients had an ascending thrombosis of the greater saphenous vein. One patient had the origin of the thrombus in the shorter saphenous vein. In one patient the ascending thrombosis of the greater saphenous vein was the reason for a segmental pulmonary embolism. The indication for operation was given when the proximal portion of the thrombus was within 10 cm of the confluence to the deep vein system. The operative procedure comprised the ligature of the epifascial vein. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of thrombophlebitis should not be restricted only to clinical examination. Color-flow duplex scanning is preferred to compression venous ultrasonography. The ascending contrast venography as invasive diagnostic procedure should only be performed for the clarification of further questions. In ascending varicophlebitis ligature of the confluence from the superficial to the deep vein system is a safe procedure to avoid a progression of the disease or embolism. In case of postoperative recanalisation of the superficial varicose vein a second operation with stripping of the vein can be performed.     

Thrombosis in unusual sites of the lower extremity veins

BACKGROUND: Thrombosis in unusual locations in the lower extremity veins has not been assessed. These veins are not imaged routinely and therefore information about them is lacking. METHODS: This study was designed to evaluate the natural history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in unusual sites. Patients with DVT in all thigh veins but the femoral vein were included. Patients with thrombi in any other vein in the first examination and those with history of DVT were excluded. Duplex ultrasound (DU) examination was performed to exclude thrombosis in the lower extremity in patients with signs and symptoms of venous thromboembolism and also in high-risk, asymptomatic patients. All veins from the distal external iliac vein to the lower calf were imaged. The deep femoral, femoropopliteal, lateral thigh, sciatic, and muscular thigh veins were examined. These patients were followed at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and yearly thereafter, for thrombus propagation, resolution, and reflux. RESULTS: Among the 15,850 DU performed in the vascular laboratory at Loyola University Medical Center, in a 10-year period to rule out DVT, 2568 (16.2%) were positive and 14 cases (7 males, 0.54% among the patients with DVT and 0.088% among the entire population) involved thromboses in unusual locations. Ten cases involved the left lower extremity and four the right. The unusual DVT cases were associated with medical and surgical conditions or were idiopathic in 11 patients, whereas three had Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome (KTS). The veins involved in the first group of patients were the deep femoral (8), the femoropopliteal (2), and the deep external pudendal (1). The patients with KTS had involvement of muscular thigh veins (1), and the lateral thigh vein and the sciatic vein (2). Thrombi propagation with extension to the common femoral vein was seen in four of the 14 patients: two from the deep femoral vein, one from the femoropopliteal vein, and one from the deep external pudendal vein. There were two incidences of pulmonary embolism (PE) one of which was fatal. At final follow-up, two patients developed recurrent DVT and nine had signs and symptoms of chronic venous disease. CONCLUSIONS: The involvement of the studied veins in DVT is extremely rare. Thrombosis in these veins can follow the natural course of thrombosis in the more usual locations and is associated with lethal incidences of PE. Therefore, the association of these veins with all the grave sequelae of thromboembolic disease suggests that inclusion of these veins in routine lower extremity duplex scans would be beneficial.