Survival of immediately loaded dental implants in deficient alveolar bone sites augmented with beta-tricalcium phosphate

PURPOSE: Dental implant placement in atrophic alveolar ridges often necessitates grafting procedures, followed by immediate or delayed implant placement. This study assessed the survival of immediately loaded dental implants placed in deficient alveolar bone sites at bone grafting. MATERIALS: From 1999 to May 2002, 1 operator (A.P.) inserted 1065 implants (607 in mandibles, 458 in maxillae) into 338 partially edentulous patients. Most implants were placed into compromised residual ridges or prepared tooth extraction sockets. Implants placed in augmented areas were splinted to implants in nonaugmented sites for stability. In all cases, beta-tricalcium phosphate was mixed with blood from the surgical site to augment the ridge level or fill spaces between the implant and socket wall. When indicated, the same materials were used for sinus floor augmentation. All implants were tapered screws with roughened surfaces, primarily (75%) from 1 manufacturer. One of the authors (Z.O.) prosthetically restored a total of 189 implants that were placed in 35 patients. In this group of patients, complete restorative data were available. All implants were monitored for 12-48 months (mean = 19.2; median = 24). RESULTS: A total of 1039 implants survived, and 26 failed, including 5 in the anterior mandible and 21 in the maxillae. In the restorative group, 186 implants survived, and 3 maxillary implants failed. All implant failures in this study occurred in the augmented sites. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, immediate loading of splinted implants in augmented sites is a predictable procedure.     

Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: a cohort, prospective clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Studies indicate that implants placed at the time of extraction have high success rates. Implants must be stable at the time of insertion. Presently there are no data indicating the degree of implant stability when implants are placed at the time of extraction. This study evaluated changes in stability of implants from implant placement to abutment connection utilizing resonance frequency analysis (RFA). The unit of measurement was the international stability quotient (ISQ). METHODS: Prior to treatment, patients were given medical history and dental evaluations. Periapical and panogram radiographs were taken. Fifty-two patients requiring extraction of one or two teeth and implant placement immediately after extraction were enrolled in this study. Under conscious sedation and local anesthesia or local anesthesia alone, teeth were atraumatically removed and the extraction sockets were debrided. A total of 73 dental implants (57 in the maxilla, 16 in the mandible) were placed. Using a one-stage approach, all implants were placed within the patient's alveolar envelope and were never placed directly into extraction sockets. All implants were placed into contained extraction sites. Bone augmentation procedures were not performed. After implant insertion, the RFA electronic transducer was attached to the head of the implant with the retaining screw. The device was attached to a computer designed to register RFA scores in ISQ units. RFA measurements were taken at implant placement and abutment connection. Bone qualities, quantity, implant length and width as well as site of placement were recorded. RESULTS: The average interval between implant insertion and abutment connection was 5.6 months (SD 2.05). Two implants were lost between implant insertion and 1 year. At 2 to 3 years, the cumulative survival was 97.2%. Resonance frequency measurements at implant placement showed a mean primary stability of 62.0 (SE 1.1; range 43 to 83 ISQ) and a mean secondary stability after 1 year of 64.0 (SE 1.2; range 40 to 98 ISQ) for all implants. The increase was marginally significant (generalized estimating equation z-statistic = 1.79; P value = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed at the time of extraction and inserted into native bone and not directly into extractions sockets have a high degree of initial stability as evidenced by RFA measurements. Implants with initial high ISQ levels revealed a slight drop in levels over time, while implants with levels lower than 60 had increases in levels between implant insertion and abutment connection. At 2 to 3 years the cumulative survival rate was 97.2%.     

A new implant designed to maximize contact with trabecular bone: survival to 18 months

PROBLEM: A roughened, commercially pure titanium (CP-Ti) implant design has been developed that features a different length and pitch for each screw thread to direct functional stresses away from cortical bone and to the more resilient trabecular bone. Abutment-implant connection is made using a conical taper to provide a seal against invasion by microorganisms. PURPOSE: To assess short-term (18 months) clinical performance of this innovative implant design. METHODS: A total of 1,419 implants were placed in 313 patients to support 419 prostheses in a multidisciplinary, multicentered, prospective clinical study conducted by the Ankylos Implant Clinical Research Group (AICRG). More than 100 dentists at 32 centers in the United States, 1 in Korea, and 1 in Taiwan are involved in the study. Failure was defined as implant removal for any reason. The influence of mobility at placement, implant length and diameter, incision type, augmentation, crestal bone reduction, bone density, and the use of the operating room or dental clinic on survival were evaluated over 18 months. Crestal bone loss between placement and uncovering was also determined. RESULTS: Crestal bone loss ranged from 0.2 to 0.5 mm. The overall success rate from placement to 18 months was 96.6%. Implants mobile at placement failed more frequently (16.9%) compared with stable implants (3.1%). Wide-diameter implants and longer implants exhibited higher survival rates. Incision design and surgery location did not influence survival. Bone density was important to clinical survival.     

Immediate,non-submerged,root-analogue zirconia implants placed into single-rooted extraction sockets: 2-year follow-up of a clinical study

This study evaluated non-submerged, root-analogue zirconia implants with two different surfaces for immediate single-rooted tooth replacement in 18 patients. After tooth extraction the root was laser scanned and one-piece root analogue zirconia dental implants with one of two different surfaces were manufactured. In group A (n = 6) the implant surface was roughened by sandblasting only, in group B (n = 12) additional macroretentions limited to the interdental space, to avoid fracture of the thin buccal cortex, were designed prior to laser scanning. Implants were placed in the socket 1–8 days after extraction by tapping and restored with a composite crown 3–5 months later. Implant survival, level of marginal bone and adverse soft tissue changes were recorded. No complications occurred during the healing period. In group A, all implants were lost within 2 months, with an unaltered extraction socket. In group B, overall survival rate was 92% for implants that were functional for 1–33 months. Excellent aesthetic and functional results were achieved with the composite crown with minimal bone resorption and soft tissue recession. Significant modifications, such as macroretentions seem to indicate that primary stability and excellent osseointegration of immediate root-analogue zirconia implants can be achieved, while preventing unaesthetic bone resorption.     

Healing in smokers versus nonsmokers: survival rates for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement

PURPOSE: Evidence suggests that smoking is detrimental to the survival of dental implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses. Studies have shown that improving bone quantity and quality, using rough-surfaced implants, and practicing good oral hygiene may improve outcomes. In this prospective study, the long-term survival rates of implants placed simultaneously with sinus grafting in smokers and nonsmokers were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implants with roughened surfaces were immediately placed into maxillary sinus grafts in patients with 1 to 7 mm of residual bone. A total of 2132 simultaneous implants were placed into the grafted sinuses of 226 smokers (627 implants) and 505 nonsmokers (1505 implants). A majority of the patients received a composite graft consisting of 50% autogenous bone. In both smokers and nonsmokers, approximately two thirds of the implants had microtextured surfaces; the remainder had hydroxyapatite-coated surfaces. The implants were restored and monitored during clinical follow-up for up to 9 years. RESULTS: Cumulative survival of implants at 9 years was 97.9%. There were no statistically significant differences in implant failure rates between smokers and nonsmokers. DISCUSSION: Implant survival was believed to depend on the following aspects of the technique used: creation of a large buccal window to allow access to a large recipient site; use of composite grafts consisting of at least 50% autogenous bone; meticulous bone condensation; placement of long implants (i.e., 15 mm); use of implants with hydroxyapatite-coated or microtextured surfaces; use of a membrane to cover the graft and implants; antibiotic use and strict oral hygiene; use of interim implants and restricted use of dentures; and adherence to a smoking cessation protocol.     

Clinical field trial examining an implant with a sand-blasted, acid-etched surface

BACKGROUND: Conventionally, endosseous dental implants have required 3 to 6 months of uninterrupted healing based on observations for dental implants that were characterized by a relatively smooth machined surface. Many studies have since demonstrated that implants with a roughened surface resulted in greater bone apposition, earlier bone contact, and a stronger bond between the implant and the bone, suggesting that implants with roughened surfaces could be loaded earlier than 3 to 6 months. Formal clinical studies confirmed that implants with rough surfaces can have abutments placed and be loaded occlusally as early as 6 weeks postplacement. The purpose of this prospective, human clinical investigation was to evaluate a large number of implants with a specific rough surface (sand-blasted acid-etched [SLA]) placed in everyday practice under routine private-practice conditions. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, human clinical observational study was initiated with the goal of recruiting a minimum of 500 patients and 800 implants. The implants were to be placed and restored in predominantly private-practice settings around the world. Ninety-two practitioners in 16 countries agreed to participate, and 86 followed the study design. Patients had to be in good health, have sufficient bone to encase the implant, and agree to return for recall appointments. Exclusion criteria included heavy smoking (>10 cigarettes a day) and bone augmentation procedures at the implant site. All implants were two-piece (an abutment was to be placed after 6 weeks of healing) and were characterized by the presence of a transmucosal polished collar. Each implant had an SLA surface. All implants were positioned using a non-submerged (single-stage) surgical technique. Survival and success rates were calculated by life-table analyses. RESULTS: A total of 706 patients were enrolled and 1,406 implants were placed. In the final analyses, 590 patients with 990 implants (70.4% of those enrolled) met all inclusion criteria, including placement of an abutment and provisional restoration within 63 days of surgical placement. The majority of implants were 10 and 12 mm long (78.7%) and were placed in type II and III bone (87%). Seventy-three percent of the implants were placed in the mandible, and 27% were placed in the maxilla. The cumulative survival rate was 99.56% at 3 years and 99.26% at 5 years. The overall success rate was 99.12% at 3 years and 97.38% after 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Under private-practice conditions, implants with an SLA surface could be placed and restored predictably within 6 to 8 weeks. Data from this prospective, multicenter, human observational study reinforced the results of more formal clinical studies and demonstrated that implants with the SLA surface can be restored in patients in approximately half of the time of conventional healing periods.     

Cortical tenting grafting technique in the severely atrophic alveolar ridge for implant site preparation

OBJECTIVES: Alveolar ridge augmentation using intraoral autogenous block grafts to augment localized alveolar ridge defects before implant placement is a predictable method. However, large severely atrophic edentulous segments may require extraoral donor sites. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of using intraoral cortical block grafts in combination with particulate human mineralized allograft, in a "tenting" fashion, to augment large atrophic alveolar ridge defects for implant placement. MATERIALS: This prospective case study evaluated augmentation in 10 consecutive patients with severely resorbed alveolar ridges missing a minimum of 4 adjacent teeth. Before augmentation, all grafted sites were deemed inadequate for placement of a standard 4-mm-diameter implant. Horizontal ridge augmentation was performed using autologous membranous cortical bone grafts from an oral donor site to tent out the soft tissue matrix and periosteum for the adjacent particulate allograft. The ridges were clinically evaluated 4 to 5 months after augmentation, and 42 implants were placed at that time. RESULTS: Implants were successfully placed at all grafted sites 4 to 5 months after the original graft date. Clinical evaluation of the grafted sites upon re-entry revealed uniform ridge anatomy. All edentulous segments had at least 2 implants placed of at least 4.0 mm diameter. In all, 42 implants were placed into grafted sites in the 10 patients. Implants were checked for osseointegration by using a counter torque of 35 N.cm. One implant failed to integrate. Mean follow-up was 22 months after implant placement. All augmented ridges had retained their functional and esthetic integrity at 1 year after original augmentation. CONCLUSION: Tenting of the periosteum and soft tissue matrix using a cortical bone block maintains space and minimizes resorption of the particulate allograft volume. In addition, bridging the cortical blocks with particulate bone avoids unaesthetic ridge defects between cortical block grafts in larger ridge defects. The result was a more uniform and esthetic alveolar ridge, capable of maintaining an implant-supported prosthesis. The technique offers predictable functional and esthetic reconstruction of large-volume defects without extensive amounts of autogenous bone. This offers a superior functional and esthetic result than with either cortical or particulate grafting alone.     

The outcome of intraoral onlay block bone grafts on alveolar ridge augmentations: A systematic review

Aim: The purpose of this study was to systematically review clinical studies examining the survival and success rates of implants placed with intraoral onlay autogenous bone grafts to answer the following question: do ridge augmentations procedures with intraoral onlay block bone grafts in conjunction with or prior to implant placement influence implant outcome when compared with a control group (guided bone regeneration, alveolar distraction, native bone or short dental implants.)? Material and Method: An electronic data banks and hand searching were used to find relevant articles on vertical and lateral augmentation procedures performed with intraoral onlay block bone grafts for dental implant therapy published up to October 2013. Publications in English, on human subjects, with a controlled study design –involving at least one group with defects treated with intraoral onlay block bone grafts, more than five patients and a minimum follow-up of 12 months after prosthetic loading were included. Two reviewers extracted the data. Results: A total of 6 studies met the inclusion criteria: 4 studies on horizontal augmentation and 2 studies on vertical augmentation. Intraoperative complications were not reported. Most common postsurgical complications included mainly mucosal dehiscences (4 studies), bone graft or membrane exposures (3 studies), complete failures of block grafts (2 studies) and neurosensory alterations (4 studies). For lateral augmentation procedures, implant survival rates ranged from 96.9% to 100%, while for vertical augmentation they ranged from 89.5% to 100%. None article studied the soft tissues healing. Conclusions: Survival and success rates of implants placed in horizontally and vertically resorbed edentulous ridges reconstructed with block bone grafts are similar to those of implants placed in native bone, in distracted sites or with guided bone regeneration. More surgical challenges and morbidity arise from vertical augmentations, thus short implants may be a feasible option. Key words:Alveolar ridge augmentation, intraoral bone grafts, onlay grafts, block grafts, dental implants.     

The single-tooth implant: a viable alternative for single-tooth replacement

BACKGROUND: The use of dental implants for single-tooth replacement cases introduces a challenge to the performance of these restorations. Clinical data suggest that single-tooth implant restorations do not benefit from lateral support from the surrounding dentition as do bridged implants, and that these restorations are subjected to greater masticatory forces. Therefore, single-tooth implants are exposed to an increased risk of failure. This prospective clinical trial was designed to evaluate the cumulative success rate of dual acid-etched single-tooth replacement implants in two clinical centers. METHODS: The study protocol included 59 patients between 19 and 73 years. Implants were evaluated for mobility, infection, and crestal bone loss from 30.9 to 60 months. RESULTS: Seventy-one (71) implants were placed in 59 patients, 20 male and 39 female. Forty-seven (47) were placed in the maxilla and 24 in the mandible. The percentages of anterior and posterior implants were 45.1% and 54.9%, respectively. A total of 13 (18.4%) implants were placed in soft, poor quality (Type IV) bone. Beginning 1 month post-implant placement, cases were followed for 30.9 to 60 months with a mean follow-up of 45.9 months. One implant failed (peri-implant infection) yielding an overall success rate of 98.6%. CONCLUSIONS: This success rate for single-tooth replacement dual acid-etched implants compares favorably with bridged implants and with success rates of other single-tooth implant studies. Dual acid-etched implants performed well even under conditions of poor quality bone, where concomitant bone augmentation was performed, and when used for immediate replacement of extracted teeth.     

Predictability of simultaneous implant placement in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla: A 9-year longitudinal experience study of 2132 implants placed into 731 human sinus grafts

PURPOSE: One-stage implant placement in the grafted maxillary sinus has traditionally been limited to patients with at least 5 mm of residual bone to ensure complete implant stabilization. The aim of this prospective study was to determine the long-term survival rates of implants with roughened surfaces placed immediately into maxillary sinus grafts in patients with 1 to 5 mm of residual bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2132 microtextured screw-type (n=1374) or hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder-type (n=758) implants were immediately placed into the grafted sinuses of 731 patients. The implants were restored and monitored for up to 9 years of clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Cumulative survival at 9 years was 97.9% (n=2091 implants); 20.4% of the implants were placed in 1 to 2 mm of residual bone. Discussion: Initial implant stability and parallelism were achieved through a combination of meticulous condensation of the particulate bone graft material around the implants, the frictional interface of the roughened implant surfaces and the host tissues, and selection of an appropriate graft material. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous implant placement into sinus floor grafts can be a predictable treatment option for patients with at least 1 to 2 mm of vertical residual bone height when careful case planning and meticulous surgical techniques are used.     

Efficacy of Cancellous Block Allograft Augmentation Prior to Implant Placement in the Posterior Atrophic Mandible

Background: The present study evaluated the outcome of ridge augmentation with cancellous freeze‐dried block bone allografts in the posterior atrophic mandible followed by placement of dental implants. Materials and Methods: A bony deficiency of at least 3 mm, horizontally, vertically, or both, according to computerized tomography (CT) para‐axial reconstruction served as inclusion criteria. Implants were inserted after a healing period of 6 months. Bone measurements were taken prior to bone augmentation, during implant placement, and at second‐stage surgery. Marginal bone loss and crown‐to‐implant ratio were also measured. Results: Twenty‐nine cancellous allogeneic bone blocks were placed in 21 patients. The mean follow‐up was 37 months. Bone block survival rate was 79.3%. Mean horizontal and vertical bone gains were 5.6 and 4.3 mm, respectively. Mean buccal bone resorption was 0.5 mm at implant placement and 0.2 mm at second‐stage surgery. A total of 85 implants were placed. Mean bone thickness buccal to the implant neck was 2.5 mm at implant placement and 2.3 mm at second‐stage surgery. There was no evidence of vertical bone loss between implant placement and second‐stage surgery. Implant survival rate was 95.3%. All patients received a fixed implant‐supported prosthesis. At the last follow‐up, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.5 mm. The mean crown‐to‐implant ratio was 0.96. Conclusion: Implant placement in the posterior atrophic mandible following augmentation with cancellous freeze‐dried bone block allografts may be regarded as a viable treatment alternative.     

Early loading of unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures using a one-stage operative procedure with two different implant systems: a 2-year report

Background: Step‐wise reduction in loading protocols is necessary to evaluate early loading of implants with mandibular overdentures. Purpose: To compare the success rates of two different dental implant systems following conventional or early loading protocols in patients being rehabilitated with mandibular overdentures. Materials and Methods: Forty‐eight edentulous participants were randomly allocated to two different implant systems: one with a machined titanium implant surface (Sterioss, Nobel Biocare, Yorba Linda, California, USA) and the other with a roughened titanium surface (Southern Implants, Irene, South Africa). For each system, the participants were further divided into control groups, in whom mandibular implant overdentures and their respective matrices were inserted following a standard 12‐week healing period, and test groups, in whom a 6‐week healing period was followed prior to identical loading. Two unsplinted implants to support implant overdentures were placed in the anterior mandible of all participants, using a standardized one‐stage surgical procedure. Mobility tests and marginal bone levels, as well as periimplant parameters, were evaluated at each baseline and 52 and 104 weeks after surgery. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the success rates of the two systems in either control or test groups. At the 2‐year evaluation, a success rate was found of 87.5% and 70.8.% for the control and test Sterioss groups, respectively, and 83.3% and 100% for the control and test Southern Implants groups were observed. For the Sterioss groups, eight implants were lost at an early stage: seven in the test group and one in the control group. For the Southern Implants control and test groups, no failures were seen at any time interval. There were no significant differences in marginal bone loss, Periotest values, and peri‐implant parameters between implant systems or between any of the control or test groups. Conclusions: Early loading, with step‐wise reductions in loading protocols, of unsplinted machined Sterioss and roughened Southern Implants fixtures with mandibular overdentures is possible for up to 2 years.     

A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results

Background: The alveolar ridge undergoes reabsorption and atrophy subsequent to tooth removal and thus exhibits a wide range of dimensional changes. Preservation of the alveolar crest after tooth extraction is essential to enhance the surgical site before implant fixture placement. The aim of this randomized clinical study is to investigate and compare the need for additional augmentation procedures at implant insertion, as well as the success rate and marginal bone loss for implants placed in the grafted sites versus those placed in naturally healed sites. Methods: Forty patients with ≥1 hopeless tooth were randomly allocated to: 1) a test group, receiving extraction and grafting corticocancellous porcine bone; and 2) a control group, receiving extraction without any graft. After 7 months of healing, implants were inserted in each of the sites. The implants were submerged and loaded after 4 months with metal–ceramic rehabilitation. The follow‐up included evaluation of implant diameter and length, the need for additional augmentation procedures at implant placement, implant failure, and marginal bone level changes. All patients were followed over a 3‐year period. Results: One implant failed in the control group at the second stage of surgery (6 months after placement); one implant failed in the test group after 2 years of loading. The cumulative implant success rate at the 3‐year follow‐up visit reached 95% for both groups. No statistically significant differences were detected for marginal bone changes between the two groups. Conclusions: It was concluded that implants placed into grafted extraction sockets exhibited a clinical performance similar to implants placed into non‐grafted sites in terms of implant survival and marginal bone loss. However, grafted sites allowed placement of larger implants and required less augmentation procedures at implant placement when compared to naturally healed sites.     

Immediate nonfunctional loading of single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla following augmentation with freeze-dried cancellous block allograft: a case series

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical effectiveness of immediate nonfunctional loading for single-tooth implants placed in the anterior maxilla following augmentation with cancellous freeze-dried block graft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical outcomes of immediately nonfunctionally loaded implants up to 18 months after placement in the anterior maxilla were evaluated in 11 consecutive patients. Implants were immediately restored with unsplinted acrylic resin provisional crowns. Follow-up was monthly, and intraoral radiographs were obtained immediately after implant placement and at 6, 12, and 18 months. Survival rate and radiographic marginal bone loss were evaluated at 0, 6, 12, and 18 months. In the anterior maxilla, 12 implants were placed. RESULTS: Marginal bone loss did not extend beyond the first thread up to 18 months follow-up, and the survival rate was 100%. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of the present study, immediate nonfunctional loading for single-tooth implants placed in the anterior maxilla following augmentation with cancellous freeze-dried block graft seems a promising treatment alternative.     

The influence of non-matching implant and abutment diameters on radiographic crestal bone levels in dogs

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that different implant designs and different vertical implant positions have an influence on crestal bone levels. The aim of the present study was to evaluate radiographic crestal bone changes around experimental dental implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters placed submucosally or transmucosally at three different levels relative to the alveolar crest. METHODS: Sixty two-piece dental implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters were placed in edentulous spaces bilaterally in five foxhounds. The implants were placed submucosally or transmucosally in the left or the right side of the mandible. Within each side, six implants were randomly placed at three distinct levels relative to the alveolar crest. After 12 weeks, 60 crowns were cemented. Radiographs were obtained from all implant sites following implant placement, after crown insertion, and monthly for 6 months after loading. RESULTS: Radiographic analysis revealed very little bone loss and a slight increase in bone level for implants placed at the level of the crest or 1 mm above. The greatest bone loss occurred at implants placed 1 mm below the bone crest. No clinically significant differences regarding marginal bone loss and the level of the bone-to-implant contact were detected between implants with a submucosal or a transmucosal healing. CONCLUSIONS: Implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters demonstrated some bone loss; however, it was a small amount. There was no clinically significant difference between submucosal and transmucosal approaches.     

A Prospective 1‐Year Clinical and Radiographic Study of Implants Placed after Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Synthetic Biphasic Calcium Phosphate or Deproteinized Bovine Bone

Background: The technique of using bone grafts or different biomaterials for augmentation of the maxillary sinus prior to implant placement is well accepted by clinicians. However, clinical documentation of some bone substitutes is still lacking. Purpose: This prospective study was designed to evaluate the success rate of implants placed after maxillary sinus augmentation with a novel synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) or deproteinized bovine bone (DBB), the latter acting as control. Material and Methods: Nine edentulous patients and two partially edentulous patients with a mean age of 67 years with a bilateral need for sinus augmentation, <5 mm residual bone in the floor of the sinus and a crestal width ≥4 mm, were included in the study. After bilateral elevation of the Schneiderian membrane, all patients were randomized for augmentation with synthetic BCP in one side and DBB in the contralateral side. After 8 months of graft healing, 62 implants with an SLActive surface were placed. Implant survival, graft resorption, plaque index, bleeding on probing, sulcus bleeding index, probing pocket depth, and implant success rate were evaluated after 1 year of functional loading. Results: After a mean of 118 days, all patients received their fixed prosthetic constructions. One implant was lost in each biomaterial, giving an overall survival rate of 96.8%. Success rates for implants placed in BCP and DBB were 91.7 and 95.7%, respectively. No significant difference in marginal bone loss was found around implants placed in BCP, DBB, or residual bone, respectively. The mean graft resorption was 0.43 mm (BCP) and 0.29 mm (DBB). Conclusion: In this limited study, implant success rate was not dependent on the biomaterial used for maxillary sinus augmentation. Similar results were found after 1 year of functional loading for implants placed after sinus augmentation using BCP or DBB.     

For which clinical indications in dental implantology is the use of bone substitute materials scientifically substantiated?

Purpose: The objective of this systematic review was to provide a basis for an expert consensus group to evaluate the influence of different particulate bone substitute materials in local bone augmentation procedures in conjunction with dental implant placement on implant survival and histology. Materials and methods: The following indications were analysed with either simultaneous or delayed dental implant placement: external or internal maxillary sinus floor elevation and vertical and/or lateral alveolar ridge augmentation. Retro- and prospective studies written in English or German including 20 or more patients (for randomised, controlled trials and prospective, split-mouth trials with 5 or more patients) were eligible for this review. The review focused on (1) performance of the augmentation procedures (total augmentation loss, gain of vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge dimensions, histomorphometric data of the augmented areas) and (2) dental implant success criteria (survival rates of the inserted dental implants, peri-implant bone levels under functional loading). Results: From over 3800 abstracts identified, 72 full-text articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were further evaluated (52 studies on maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures and 21 studies on vertical and/or lateral alveolar ridge augmentation). The majority of the included studies were prospective studies including a rather limited number of patients and short observation periods. Conclusions: There is a high level of evidence that survival rates of dental implants placed into augmented areas are comparable with survival rates of implants placed into pristine bone. For maxillary sinus floor elevation, all investigated bone substitute materials performed equally well compared with bone, with high dental implant survival rates and adequate histomorphometric data. For the alveolar ridge augmentation procedures, the heterogeneity of the available data did not allow identification of a superior grafting technique.     

Bone-to-implant apposition with machined and MTX microtextured implant surfaces in human sinus grafts

The goal of this study was to histologically document the effect of two different implant surfaces on the percentage of bone-to-implant apposition achieved with implants placed in human sinus grafts. The influences of implant site and post-grafting delay time were also examined. Nine healthy volunteers were scheduled to undergo posterior maxillary sinus floor augmentation in preparation for delayed implant placement. In addition to the conventional dental implants selected for each case, titanium alloy experimental implants, 2.5 mm in diameter and 8 mm in length, were custom manufactured. Each microimplant was prepared longitudinally with two different surface topographies: machined on one side and MTX microtextured on the other side. A notch prepared across the superior aspect of the implants facilitated placement and provided a reference line between the two surfaces. Patients were divided into two groups that received the experimental microimplants at the time of conventional implant placement: Group A (six patients) received the experimental microimplants in the regenerated lateral wall of the sinus graft 11 months after graft placement, and group B (three patients) received them in the alveolar crest 6 months after graft placement. After 6 months of submerged healing, all experimental and conventional implants appeared to be clinically osseointegrated. Histologic analysis revealed that the mean bone-to-implant apposition was significantly greater with MTX (72.31% +/- 17.76%) compared to machined surfaces (38.01% +/- 19.32%), regardless of bone quality. The healing time between graft and implant placement and implant location did not statistically impact the percentage of bone-to-implant apposition.     

Success of dental implants placed in intraoral block bone grafts

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival and success of dental implants placed in alveolar bone following augmentation using intraoral block bone grafts. METHODS: A consecutive retrospective study was conducted on patients who had onlay bone grafts for vertical or horizontal augmentations followed by dental implantation from 1999 to 2001. Files of 50 healthy patients who received 129 implants in augmented sites were reviewed. Implant survival, radiologic implant success (marginal bone loss), and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Follow-up from time of implantation ranged from 6 to 67 months (mean: 24.3 +/- 11.2 months). Ranges of implant widths and lengths were 3.25 to 4.7 mm and 10 to 16 mm, respectively. The overall survival rate was 96.9% (four implants were removed). Marginal bone loss around implants ranged from 0 to 3.3 mm (average: 0.22 +/- 0.45 mm). Only 5% of the implants presented marginal bone loss > or =1.5 mm over the follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoral bone block graft surgery is a predictable operation for the use of dental implants. Implant placement in augmented areas presents high survival and radiologic success rates with minimal bone loss.     

Histomorphometric evaluation and clinical assessment of endosseous implants in iliac bone grafts with shortened healing periods

PURPOSE: In the present study solid monocortical hipbone onlay grafts of the maxilla were analyzed histologically after a healing period of 3 months. The clinical success of the implants placed in the grafted bone was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients underwent augmentation with avascular iliac bone. A 2-stage procedure was performed with a 3-month healing period between graft and implant placement. At implant placement bone biopsy samples were taken at the proposed implant sites. RESULTS: Of the 117 implants placed, 1 was not osseointegrated at the time of abutment connection. No implants were lost after loading during an observation period of up to 3 years. Clinical appearance of the augmented bone after 3 months showed a dense cortical layer with good blood perfusion. Histologic specimens were analyzed quantitatively and showed an average of 43.2% newly formed bone. DISCUSSION: Histomorphometry showed that the amount of newly formed bone after 3 months was comparable to that found after a healing period of 4.5 months. The clinical success of the implants placed after the shortened healing period was comparable to that found in nonaugmented bone. CONCLUSION: This study showed that after avascular iliac bone grafting, 3 months of revascularization was sufficient to ensure the secure placement of dental implants in second-stage surgery for this patient population.