Cold elbow syndrome: spurious slowing of ulnar nerve conduction velocity

Low temperature decreases nerve conduction velocity (NCV). The across-elbow segment of the ulnar nerve is superficial and may be particularly susceptible to decreased temperature. We evaluated patients without clinical ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) but with isolated slowing of the across-elbow ulnar NCV (normal group), and patients with clinical and electrodiagnostic findings of UNE (UNE group). All subjects had ulnar motor nerve studies completed before and after warming. The mean across-elbow NCV was 43.4 m/s and 48.6 m/s (P < 0.0001) in the normal group, and 37.4 m/s and 37.7 m/s (P = 0.90) in the UNE group, before and after warming, respectively. There was no change in the forearm segment NCV in either group. Seventeen of 32 subjects in the normal group had completely normal studies after warming. No patients with UNE developed normal across-elbow NCV with warming. Low temperature slows across-elbow ulnar NCV in normal subjects without impact on the forearm segment. Warming of the elbow improves across-elbow ulnar NCV in normals, but does not reverse the abnormalities in patients with UNE. Elbow warming should become a routine part of ulnar nerve conduction studies, especially when there is isolated conduction slowing in the across-elbow segment.     

Mixed nerve action potentials in acquired demyelinating polyneuropathy

Uncertainty about motor and sensory contributions in abnormal nerves has limited the use of mixed nerve action potentials (MNAPs). We recorded MNAPs in 21 patients with an acquired demyelinating neuropathy, 18 age-matched control subjects, and 10 patients with an axonal polyneuropathy. Bipolar and unipolar recordings from median and ulnar nerves were made above the elbow after electrical stimulation of the nerves at the wrist. Antidromic digital sensory action potentials and motor conduction velocity were also recorded for both nerves. In 19 median and 12 ulnar nerves from demyelinating polyneuropathy patients, compared with control subjects, MNAP amplitudes were significantly reduced (mean, 6 μV vs. 31 μV), MNAP velocities were mildly reduced (mean, 50 m/s vs. 62 m/s), motor conduction velocities were significantly reduced (mean, 33 m/s vs. 57 m/s), and MNAPs were significantly dispersed, with markedly prolonged rise times (mean, 2.0 ms vs. 1.0 ms). Compared with the axonal polyneuropathy group, MNAP amplitudes from the median nerve were similarly reduced (mean, 8 μV vs. 9 μV), MNAP velocities were only slightly slower (mean, 52 m/s vs. 58 m/s), but the rise times were significantly prolonged (mean, 2.0 ms vs. 1.2 ms). We conclude that, in acquired demyelinating neuropathies, the onset and, in some cases, the whole MNAP is from afferent fibers, which can be abnormally dispersed, and that, over the same segment, MNAP velocity is less affected than motor conduction velocity. 1995.© 1995 John Wiley &Sons, Inc.     

Spatial dispersion of magnetic stimulation in peripheral nerves

To assess the longitudinal dispersion of the stimulus induced by the magnetic coil, collision experiments were performed in seven normal ulnar nerves. A supramaximal electrical stimulus S1 was delivered at the wrist, and followed by a supramaximal stimulus S2 in the upper arm, which was either electrical (electrical collision studies), or magnetic (magnetic collision studies). The interstimulus interval was varied by 0.2 msec increments from the time of complete cancellation of the S2 evoked motor response onwards, to include the entire span of recovery of that compound motor action potential. Collision curves were obtained for both magnetic and electrical stimuli by plotting the amplitude of the motor response elicited by S2 as a function of the interstimulus interval. In all seven normal ulnar nerves, comparison of the collision curves showed that the S2 evoked motor response is restored significantly more slowly when magnetic stimulation is used. This finding is best explained by longitudinal dispersion of the stimulus induced by the magnetic coil relative to conventional electrical stimulation, the large fibers being stimulated further away from the coil than the small ones. This interpretation is confirmed by the findings obtained with the same method in two cases of ulnar neuropathy, and by comparison of different intensities of magnetic stimulation.     

Stimulation of peripheral nerves using a novel magnetic coil.

Magnetic nerve stimulation (MNS) using a novel figure-8 magnetic coil was compared with conventional electric nerve stimulation (ENS) in normal subjects and in patients with disorders of the peripheral nervous system. In contrast to previously tested coils, the virtual cathode of the novel coil was independent of the geometrical or electric conditions of the stimulated tissue. Maximal compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were elicited by MNS in all motor nerves tested. The slopes of the recruitment curves of ENS were steeper than those of MNS, indicating a comparatively lower maximal stimulation intensity and a higher intensity resolution of the magnetic stimulator. In four patients with entrapment syndromes at the ulnar groove, motor conduction velocities and amplitudes were similar for MNS and ENS across the affected nerve segment. However, in two patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), CMAPs were slightly smaller following MNS. This new technique is a promising step toward the ultimate goal of replacing ENS with MNS.     

Entrapment of motor nerves in motor neuron disease: does double crush occur?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether "diseased nerves" are more prone to entrapment neuropathy than normal nerves. Nerve conduction studies of human neuropathies have shown that electrophysiological abnormalities are often most prominent at potential sites of nerve entrapment, and entrapments are more common in patients with radiculopathies--a concept designated as "double crush". As entrapment neuropathies commonly occur in otherwise healthy subjects, it is unclear whether this relation is coincidental or whether peripheral nerves affected by disease are rendered more susceptible to effects of repeated minor trauma, traction, or mechanical compression. METHODS: Sequential ulnar nerve conduction studies were prospectively performed at baseline and at four, eight, and 12 month intervals in 16 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ulnar nerve entrapment was defined as a focal reduction (> 10 m/s) in conduction velocity in the across-elbow segment. RESULTS: Ulnar sensory and motor nerve fibres showed similar findings of ulnar nerve entrapment at baseline and at follow up over the period of the study. Nerves with ulnar nerve entrapment showed a significantly greater reduction in distal motor amplitudes than nerves without entrapment, even though distal ulnar sensory amplitudes remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Motor nerves in motor neuron disease do not seem to be more susceptible to entrapment at the elbow than do healthy sensory nerves, thus casting doubt on the double crush hypothesis. Nerves with double pathology (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and ulnar nerve entrapment), however, seem to undergo more rapid axonal loss than do nerves with single pathology (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or ulnar nerve entrapment alone).     

Peripheral and central conduction in n-hexane polyneuropathya

Electrophysiological findings of 27 males with industrial n-hexane polyneuropathy (HPNP) are presented. The results of needle electromyography and nerve conduction studies were compatible with primarily axonal polyneuropathy with secondary segmental demyelination. Motor conduction velocities were the slowest in distal regions of the nerves. In the proximal nerve segments, which were partly tested by magnetic stimulation of the nerve roots, this slowing was much less pronounced. The reduction in mean motor conduction velocities in the forearm segments of ulnar nerves was more than 30% in comparison to the control group means. This reduction was only 10% in the neckaxilla segments. We think that this finding is a reflection of the distal axonopathy process. Central motor conduction times calculated by transcranial magnetic stimulation and spinal nerve root stimulation were found to be prolonged in HPNP patients, indicating that descending motor pathways are affected in human HPNP. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Sensory and mixed nerve conduction studies in the evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow

The relative sensitivities of sensory, mixed nerve, and motor conduction studies in assessing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow have not yet been established. Using surface electrodes, we performed conduction studies across the elbow segment in 43 patients with symptoms referable to the ulnar nerve and 40 control subjects. Segmental slowing of motor conduction localized the lesion to the elbow in 14 of 21 patients (67%) with clear evidence of ulnar neuropathy on physical examination but only in 2 of 22 (9%) with subtle or no physical examination abnormalities. The diagnostic yield was increased by the finding of segmental slowing of sensory or mixed nerve conduction across the elbow to 86% and 68%, respectively, for each of the groups. We conclude that surface-recorded sensory and mixed nerve conduction studies appear to be more sensitive than motor studies in the electrodiagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow and are especially valuable in patients with subtle clinical involvement. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Diagnostic specificity of sensory and motor nerve conduction variables in early detection of carpal tunnel syndrome

Summary In the carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) sensory nerve conduction is more sensitive than motor conduction. However, 8%–25% of the sensory distal latencies in symptomatic hands may still be normal. A systematic study was made of the median, ulnar and radial orthodromic nerve conduction velocities (SNCV) stimulating each of the fingers separately. Four SNCVs from the median nerve, two SNCVs from the ulnar nerve and one from the radial nerve were obtained, and the ratio of the median to radial SNCV and the ratios of the median and ulnar SNCVs were estimated. The significance of these parameters in the diagnosis of the CTS was studied, and a rapid technique for the screening of nerve entrapment in the initial stages of the disease is proposed. Three hundred and seventy-five symptomatic hands were examined. Seventy-five hands showed normal distal latency, in which cases, however, the SNCV of the ring finger was always outside the normal range, while the SNCVs of the thumb, index and middle fingers were abnormal in 64%, 80% and 92% of cases respectively. The amplitudes of the sensory responses were the least sensitive of the parameters studied. Our results suggest that a study of the median nerve digital branch to the ring finger may be of value in providing an easily performed and rapid technique for screening an early median nerve entrapment at the wrist.     

Segmental median nerve conduction measurements discriminate carpal tunnel syndrome from diabetic polyneuropathy

Median nerve conduction has been compared in CTS, with or without diabetes, and diabetic polyneuropathy. Approximately 90% of hands were correctly predicted as CTS or diabetic polyneuropathy by a comparison including the median antidromic sensory nerve conduction velocities in the elbow-to-wrist segment, wrist-to-palm segment, palm-to-finger segment, and the amplitude of the sensory nerve action potential. CTS with diabetes could not be distinguished from CTS without diabetes. The association between proximal and distal nerve conduction velocities was similar in CTS and diabetic polyneuropathy. A study in motor fibers showed that the hands could be classified through a combination of M-wave latency and the more proximal motor nerve conduction velocity measurements. Independent of severity, motor and sensory nerve conduction was influenced to an equal degree in CTS and diabetic polyneuropathy. The hypothesis that both CTS and diabetic polyneuropathy can be associated with neural ischemia is discussed. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Ulnar nerve conduction abnormalities in carpal tunnel syndrome

Introduction: The aim of this study was to verify the involvement of ulnar nerve fibers in cases of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and investigate the correlation between ulnar nerve conduction parameters and extra‐median spread of symptoms. Methods: Electrophysiological studies were conducted in 93 CTS and 76 control hands. Patients were analyzed with regard to symptoms in the fifth finger. Results: In the CTS cases, ulnar distal motor latency (DML) and distal sensory latency (DSL) were significantly longer, and amplitudes were lower than in controls. Increased median nerve DML correlated with increased ulnar nerve DSL and decreased sensory amplitudes and conduction velocities (SCVs). In cases with symptoms in the fifth finger, ulnar nerve SCVs and amplitudes were lower than in patients without symptoms. Conclusions: Pathological processes leading to median neuropathy in CTS may affect ulnar nerve motor and sensory fibers in the Guyon canal. This may explain the extra‐median spread of sensory symptoms in CTS patients. Muscle Nerve 44: 352–357, 2011     

Heat-sensitive conduction block in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of elbow heating on conduction block (CB) and across-elbow conduction velocity (CV) in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE). METHODS: We studied 15 patients with UNE, performing motor nerve conduction studies at 32 degrees C and after heating the elbow to 42 degrees C. RESULTS: At 32 degrees C, mean response amplitude and area with above-elbow (AE) stimulation were 20.4 and 16.0% lower than with below-elbow (BE) stimulation, respectively. With heating the elbow to 42 degrees C, these differences increased significantly to 28.9 and 26.9% (P=0.019 and 0.029), respectively. The mean CV reduction in the across-elbow segment relative to the forearm segment also increased from 20.5 m/s at 32 degrees C to 25.6 m/s at 42 degrees C (P=0.0010). Across-elbow CV at 32 degrees C correlated with increased CB (as measured by amplitude) with heating (r=0.53, P=0.048) and approached significance for area (r=0.48, P=0.068) Likewise, baseline CB at 32 degrees C correlated with the likelihood of increased CB for amplitude (r=0.77, P<0.001), and approached significance for area (r=0.47, P=0.079). CONCLUSIONS: Elbow heating in UNE increases the relative drop in across-elbow CV and the degree of across-elbow CB; absolute across-elbow CV and the presence of baseline CB at 32 degrees C are good predictors of this latter effect.     

Pearls & Oy-sters: false positives in short-segment nerve conduction studies due to ulnar nerve dislocation

The possibility that a technical error may occur during nerve conduction studies due to ulnar nerve dislocation when the elbow is flexed has recently been suggested. We investigated normal volunteers using ultrasonography to observe the effects of ulnar nerve dislocation during elbow flexion on short-segment nerve conduction studies. We found significant conduction block in all of the subjects with ulnar nerve dislocation, and the finding was defined as a technical error caused by volume conduction. The results of the present study suggest that caution should be exercised when interpreting the results of short-segment nerve conduction studies at the across-elbow segment due to the possibility of technical error induced by ulnar nerve dislocation.     

Determining the site of stimulation during magnetic stimulation of a peripheral nerve.

Magnetic stimulation has not been routinely used for studies of peripheral nerve conduction primarily because of uncertainty about the location of the stimulation site. We performed several experiments to locate the site of nerve stimulation. Uniform latency shifts, similar to those that can be obtained during electrical stimulation, were observed when a magnetic coil was moved along the median nerve in the region of the elbow, thereby ensuring that the properties of the nerve and surrounding volume conductor were uniform. By evoking muscle responses both electrically and magnetically and matching their latencies, amplitudes and shapes, the site of stimulation was determined to be 3.0 +/- 0.5 cm from the center of an 8-shaped coil toward the coil handle. When the polarity of the current was reversed by rotating the coil, the latency of the evoked response shifted by 0.65 +/- 0.05 msec, which implies that the site of stimulation was displaced 4.1 +/- 0.5 cm. Additional evidence of cathode- and anode-like behavior during magnetic stimulation comes from observations of preferential activation of motor responses over H-reflexes with stimulation of a distal site, and of preferential activation of H-reflexes over motor responses with stimulation of a proximal site. Analogous behavior is observed with electrical stimulation. These experiments were motivated by, and are qualitatively consistent with, a mathematical model of magnetic stimulation of an axon.     

The electrodiagnosis of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow

Entrapment of the ulnar nerve at the elbow is the second most common focal peripheral neuropathy. Recent advances have facilitated the electrodiagnosis of this common nerve entrapment. The goals of electrodiagnosis are to localize ulnar nerve dysfunction, confirm that the disturbance is confined to the ulnar nerve, and assess the severity of ulnar nerve dysfunction. The goal of this review is to highlight the important advances in anatomy, neurophysiology and methodology that impact upon the electrodiagnosis of entrapment of the ulnar nerve at the elbow, illustrate the limits of electrodiagnosis, and discuss methodological issues that may be the subject of further study. Careful attention to elbow position, temperature, and conservative estimates of conduction block should be part of common practice. Awareness of anatomical variations in structural anatomy, anomalous innervation and fascicular arrangement of ulnar nerve fibers are required to interpret electrodiagnostic studies accurately. The most reliable finding is slowing of the ulnar across-elbow motor nerve conduction velocity to less than 50 m/sec while recording from the abductor digiti minimi muscle, and should be carefully interpreted in the presence of a polyneuropathy or other neurogenic process. Alternative techniques such as relative ulnar slowing in different ulnar nerve segments, use of alternative muscles, sensory and mixed nerve techniques provide complementary information, and like all nerve conduction studies are highly operator-dependent and should be used on a case by case basis. Recent studies have focused the electromyographer's attention on the use of shorter across-elbow segments (2-5 cm). This may offer a reasonable trade-off between sensitivity and measurement error and may result in improved electrodiagnosis.     

The H-reflex to magnetic stimulation of lower-limb nerves.

We elicited H-reflexes by magnetic and electrical stimulation of several different nerves in 10 healthy subjects and two patients with S-1 radiculopathy. The posterior tibial nerve at the popliteal fossa and the femoral nerve at the inguinal ligament were tested with both electrical and magnetic stimulation; the proximal sciatic nerve was tested only with magnetic stimulation. Muscle activity was recorded from the soleus muscle for posterior tibial and sciatic nerve stimulation and from the vastus medialis muscle for femoral nerve stimulation. No significant difference was found between the latency of H-reflexes evoked by magnetic or electrical stimulation. With magnetic stimulation, the mean (+/- SD) Ia sensory fiber conduction velocity in the proximal segment of the sciatic nerve was 72.4 +/- 3.3 m/s, while the motor nerve fiber conduction velocity in the same portion of the nerve was significantly slower, at 60.6 +/- 2.0 m/s. In two patients with unilateral S-1 radiculopathy, the latency of the H-reflex from the soleus muscle to both magnetic and electrical stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve was absent or prolonged on the affected side. Magnetic stimulation can be used to study the H-reflex and Ia fiber conduction velocity and is particularly advantageous when testing deeply located nerve trunks.     

Measuring conduction velocity distributions in peripheral nerves using neurophysiological techniques

ObjectiveTo determine how long it takes for neural impulses to travel along peripheral nerve fibers in living humans.MethodsA collision test was performed to measure the conduction velocity distribution of the ulnar nerve. Two stimuli at the distal and proximal sites were used to produce the collision. Compound muscle or nerve action potentials were recorded to perform the measurements on the motor or mixed nerve, respectively. Interstimulus interval was set at 1–5 ms. A quadri-pulse technique was used to measure the refractory period and calibrate the conduction time.ResultsCompound muscle action potential produced by the proximal stimulation started to emerge at the interstimulus interval of about 1.5 ms and increased with the increment in interstimulus interval. Two groups of motor nerve fibers with different conduction velocities were identified. The mixed nerve showed a wider conduction velocity distribution with identification of more subgroups of nerve fibers than the motor nerve.ConclusionsThe conduction velocity distributions in high resolution on a peripheral motor and mixed nerve are different and this can be measured with the collision test.SignificanceWe provided ground truth data to verify the neuroimaging pipelines for the measurements of latency connectome in the peripheral nervous system.     

Magnetic stimulation over the spinal enlargements.

Magnetic stimulation over the cervical and lumbar spinal enlargements was performed in 10 normal volunteers using a 9 cm diameter coil. Although the threshold and the amplitude of responses depended on the position of the coil and the direction of current flow within it, the latency was constant. The latencies obtained by magnetic stimulation were compatible with those obtained using high voltage electrical stimulation of the spinal nerve roots and always were shorter than the peripheral motor conduction time estimated by F-wave techniques. The site of activation by magnetic stimulation appears to be very similar to that stimulated by the high-voltage electrical method. Stimulation of descending motor tracts within the cord was not possible using the magnetic stimulator.     

Length dependence of variables associated with temporal dispersion in human motor nerves

Temporal dispersion in motor nerves is associated with changes of amplitude, area, duration, and Fourier spectra of compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) when comparing responses to proximal and distal stimulation. These changes depend on the length of the nerve segment. To quantitatively assess this dependence, motor conduction studies of nerve segments of various lengths were performed in the median, ulnar, and tibial nerves of 86 test subjects, aged 4 to 73 years. Amplitude, area, duration, and spectral energy above 49 Hz of CMAPs were measured. Values after distal and proximal stimulation of each nerve segment were compared to determine amplitude decay, area decay, protraction, and high-frequency attenuation. A significant length dependence of amplitude decay was found in the tibial and ulnar nerves, of area decay in the median and ulnar nerves, and of CMAP duration in the ulnar and tibial nerves. The length dependence of the high-frequency attenuation was significant in all nerves studied. This report provides normative data for variables associated with temporal dispersion.     

Withdrawal reflexes in adductor muscles elicited by electrical and magnetic stimulation of the obturator nerve

The withdrawal reflex in the short head of the biceps femoris muscle after electrical stimulation of the sural nerve at the ankle has been investigated in numerous studies. These studies have described two distinct responses: early (R-II) and late (R-III). However, withdrawal reflex activity of the adductor muscles in the legs has not been studied systematically. Adductor muscle reflex activity is important because it can produce serious clinical problems, such as adductor spasticity and spasms, during bladder surgery. The present study examined withdrawal reflex features of adductor muscles obtained by electrical and magnetic stimulation of the obturator nerve (ON) in 34 normal healthy subjects. Early adductor muscle withdrawal reflex responses were elicited by ipsilateral ON electrical stimulation with a mean latency of 45.7+/-2.0 ms (responses in 94% of subjects). Reflex responses were also obtained using magnetic stimulation at a similar incidence rate. Contralateral ON electrical stimulation resulted in a similar reflex, but with a lower incidence. ON and femoral nerve electrical and magnetic coil stimulation produced similar low-incidence responses in the vastus medialis. These findings indicate that short latency adductor withdrawal reflexes are easily obtained on both sides following electrical or magnetic stimulation of the ON, and they can be elicited by both nociceptive and nonnociceptive stimuli. These reflexes prepare the body for a proper response to incoming signals and likely serve to protect the pelvic floor and pelvic organs.     

Relevance of stimulus duration for activation of motor and sensory fibers: implications for the study of H-reflexes and magnetic stimulation.

Electric stimuli with durations of 0.5-1.0 msec are optimal for studies of H-reflexes. It is more difficult to obtain H-reflexes with shorter duration stimuli or with magnetic stimulation. In order to understand this behavior, we studied the excitation thresholds for motor and sensory fibers in the ulnar, median and tibial nerves using both electric and magnetic stimulation. For short duration electrical stimuli (0.1 msec) the threshold for motor fibers is lower than for sensory fibers. For longer duration electric stimuli (1.0 msec) the threshold for sensory fibers is lower. For magnetic stimulation the threshold for motor fibers is much lower than for sensory fibers. Thus, stimulus duration is a critical parameter for sensory fiber excitation, and current magnetic stimulators are not optimal.