Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIC-MVS) was introduced into clinical practice in the mid 1990s. Since then it has evolved as the standard technique at some specialized centers. The routine technique includes femoral access for extracorporeal circulation, a right lateral minithoracotomy and direct aortic clamping using special instruments. Different techniques leading to some variations have been described. There is no prospectively randomized trial comparing minimally invasive with conventional mitral valve surgery. However, several series including large patient numbers and up to 8 years of follow-up have been published. Literature results as well as different aspects of minimally invasive MVS are discussed in this review, including the development, the current technique and future perspectives. Regarding MIC-MVS the word is that it is a safe and effective operation. Lateral minithoracotomy access offers excellent exposure, visualization can be further enhanced when using endoscopic cameras. All different mitral valve repair procedures can be performed even in the presence of complex pathologies. The repair rate is excellent and reaches 75%. Patient recovery is fast leading to a significant improvement in individual quality of life. MIC-MVS can now be considered the standard approach and will reach more widespread clinical application.     

Minimally invasive direct access mitral valve surgery.

We reviewed our experience with minimally invasive direct-access mitral valve surgery in 207 patients through February 1999. Three patients underwent associated procedures, a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with right internal mammary artery to right carotid artery (RIMA-RCA), a left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) debridement for endocarditis, and a primum atrial septal defect (ASD) repair, and were excluded from analysis. Of the 204 remaining patients, 120 (59%) patients were men, aged 58.7 +/- 13.2 years, functional class of 2.3 +/- 0.5. The cause was myxomatous in 162 (79%) patients, rheumatic in 28 (14%) patients, endocarditis in 8 (4%) patients, congenital in 3 (2%) patients, and ischemic in 3 (2%) patients. Mean preoperative EF was 60% +/- 10%, with 184 (90%) patients showing ejection fraction (EF) greater than 50%. The valve was approached through a 5- to 8-cm right parasternal (n = 180, 88%) or right inframammary (n = 24, 12%) incision. One hundred nineteen (58%) patients had open femoral artery-femoral vein cannulation, and 85 (42%) patients had direct cannulation of the aorta and percutaneous cannulation of the femoral vein. One hundred seventy (83%) patients underwent successful valve repair, and 34 (17%) patients required valve replacement. The mean duration of aortic clamping and cardiopulmonary were, respectively, 100 +/- 34 and 146 +/- 44 minutes. There were 2 (1%) surgical deaths. Nonfatal perioperative complications included 3 (1.5%) ascending aortic complications, 3 (1.5%) reoperations for bleeding, 4 (2%) strokes, 2 (1%) transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), 2 (1%) myocardial infarctions, 3 (1.5%) pericardial effusions requiring drainage, 9 (4.5%) vascular complications, and 3 (1.5%) wound complications. Mean length of stay (LOS) was 6.1 +/- 3 days, with 63 (31%) patients being discharged in less than 5 days. One hundred twenty-nine (63%) patients did not require blood transfusions. Follow-up was complete in 165 (81%) patients, with mean follow-up of 13.2 +/- 8 months. Late complications included 1 (0.5%) myocardial infarction, 3 (1.5%) reoperations, all converting repairs to replacements, 3 (1.5%) wound hernias requiring reoperation and repair with mesh, 5 (2.5%) thromboembolic events, and 3 (1.5%) deaths of suicide, pneumonia, and sudden death, respectively. Mean follow-up New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was 1.2 +/- 0.5. We conclude that minimally invasive direct-access mitral valve surgery is safe, effective, and applicable for most patients presenting for isolated mitral valve surgery. We now consider it the standard of care for selected patients.     

Minimally invasive mitral surgery: mitral valve repair with a right-sided partial sternotomy

We describe our concept and the results of mitral valve repair using a right-sided partial sternotomy. We performed mitral valve repair using this method in 50 patients with severe MR between April 1997 and October 1998. In 10 patients in whom good exposure was not attained, we changed to the ordinary full-sternotomy or T-shaped partial sternotomyprocedure. Forty patients with good exposure underwent successful mitral valve repair. The sites of repair were anterior in 15 cases, posterior in 16, and both in 9. There was no mortality, and intraoperative TEE performed in all 40 patients revealed that all had trivial or no regurgitation. The right-sided partial sternotomy (open door method) is a safe and useful method for minimally invasive valve Surgery. A better quality of life compared with traditional median sternotomy can be ensured for patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery only when receive the best-quality Surgery is performed.     

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through right anterolateral minithoracotomy.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the feasibility of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. The aim of the study was to minimize surgical access to achieve better cosmetic results, less postoperative discomfort, and faster recovery. METHODS: From September 1997 to October 1998, 76 patients underwent mitral valve surgery through a right anterolateral minithoracotomy at the fourth intercostal space. The mitral valve was either repaired (n = 21) or replaced (n = 55). In all cases, open femoral artery-femoral vein cannulation was used for cardiopulmonary bypass. In 27 cases, an endoluminal aortic clamp was used, but in 49 cases, the aorta was cross-clamped with a transthoracic, sliding-rod-design clamp. RESULTS: There were no approach-related limitations to surgical intervention. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography revealed excellent results after valve repair and no paravalvular leak in any patient after mitral valve replacement. Mean duration of intensive care and postoperative hospital stay was 32+/-5.2 hours and 7+/-1.1 days, respectively. There were no major complications related to femoral vessel cannulation. In 1 patient, transient neurological problems developed, with subsequent complete recovery. There was one hospital mortality (85-year-old male patient died of upper GI bleeding). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive port access mitral valve surgery can accelerate recovery and decrease pain, while maintaining overall surgical efficacy. It also provides better cosmetic results to our patients, and now it has become our standard approach for isolated mitral valve surgery.     

The transseptal approach to the mitral valve during multivalvular surgery

Abstract Aim: We investigated the short and mid‐term outcome of the transseptal approach to the mitral valve during multivalvular surgery. Methods: Within a three‐year period ending in May 2010, we used the transseptal approach in performing mitral valve surgery in 62 patients. Procedures performed were: mitral valve replacement and tricuspid annuloplasty in 40 patients, both aortic and mitral valve replacement with tricuspid annuloplasty in 13 patients, mitral valve and tricuspid valve replacement in eight patients and mitral valve repair and tricuspid annuloplasty in addition to coronary artery bypass surgery in one patient. Results: There were no complications associated with the transseptal approach. There were no conduction abnormalities, nor were there any procedure‐related deaths. Conclusion: We conclude that use of the transseptal approach for mitral valve operations is simple and safe in patients necessitating right atriotomy for concomitant procedures. (J Card Surg 2011;26:472‐474)     

Minimally invasive surgery of mitral valve (MIS-MV)

Following the revision of the therapeutic guideline of ACC/AHA in (Circulation 114:450–527, 2006), the incidence of mitral valve repair in asymptomatic patients with moderate or severe mitral valve regurgitation has increased. For mitral valve repair, the quality and outcomes as well as lower invasive procedure are important to obtain the confidence of cardiologists and ensure request of early phase operation from cardiologists. With recent innovations of technologies and the development of revolutionary techniques, minimally invasive surgery of the mitral valve (MIS-MV) has become a widespread surgical option of mitral valve repair. It is vital, however, that careful preoperative assessment, and planning of the approach and perfusion strategy are put in place to perform MIS-MV safely.     

Minimally invasive approach for redo mitral valve surgery: a true benefit for the patient

OBJECTIVES: Redo mitral valve surgery via sternotomy is associated with a substantial morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated a minimally invasive technique for mitral valve redo procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Out of a series of 394 patients undergoing mitral valve repair or replacement via a right minithoracotomy, 39 patients underwent redo mitral valve surgery (59+/-13 years, 23 female). Previous cardiac surgeries included 17 patients with mitral valve repair, 6 patients with mitral valve replacement, 3 patients with aortic valve replacement, 2 patients with atrial septal defect closure, and 11 patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In all cases, femoro-femoral cannulation was performed. The port access technique was applied in patients undergoing redo valve surgery. In patients with prior CABG, the operation was performed using deep hypothermia and ventricular fibrillation. RESULTS: In all cases, sternotomy was avoided. The mitral valve was replaced in 20 patients and repaired in 19. Time of surgery and cross-clamp time were comparable with the overall series (168+/-73 [redo] vs 168+/-58 min and 52+/-21 [redo] vs 58+/-25 min). Mortality was 5.1%. One patient had transient hemiplegia due to the migration of the endoclamp. All other patients had uneventful outcomes and normal mitral valve function at 3-month's follow-up. CONCLUSION: Redo mitral valve surgery can be performed safely using a minimally invasive approach in patients with a previous sternotomy. The right lateral minithoracotomy offers excellent exposure. It minimizes the need for cardiac dissection, and thus, the risk for injury. Avoiding a resternotomy increases patient comfort of redo mitral valve surgery.     

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a review of the literature

Purpose

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) is a heterogenous concept referring to a gamut of surgical approaches to the mitral valve. When compared to conventional sternotomy (CONV-ST), MIMVS appears to offer superior patient satisfaction and recovery time. However, published results differ between institutions due to variations in technique, and mid- to long-term data is relatively scant. Despite the limitations of the evidence base, patient demand for minimally invasive operations remains strong. This demand is only likely to rise in the future as surgery is being recommended earlier in the course of disease and patients are referred for operation at a younger age. This review therefore isolates each MIMVS technique to evaluate its place in current surgical practice, as well as areas of future research.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Search terms included ‘minimally invasive surgical procedures’, ‘mitral valve’, ‘sternotomy’, ‘thoracotomy’, ‘mitral valve repair’, and ‘mitral valve replacement’. Articles were also gathered from other sources, including manual searches through reference lists of articles and recommended ‘related articles’.

Summary

MIMVS has evolved from using smaller incisions to endoscopic surgery, robotics, and, most recently, percutaneous off-pump procedures. It is now standard practice at centres around the world. At present, the right minithoracotomy is the most common approach, though robotic and percutaneous techniques are suitable for certain patients. Collaboration between cardiothoracic surgeons, interventional cardiologists, and other disciplines will be essential in furthering the newest minimally invasive techniques. Future research should depend on long-term data, broad patient sampling, and high-tier evidence.

     

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a 6-year experience with 714 patients

BACKGROUND: This study analyzes a single institutional experience with minimally invasive mitral valve operations of 6 years, reviewing short-term morbidity and mortality and long-term echocardiographic follow-up data. METHODS: Seven hundred fourteen consecutive patients had minimally invasive mitral valve procedures between November 1995 and November 2001; concomitant procedures included 91 multiple valves and 18 coronary artery bypass grafts. Of these 714 patients, 561 patients had isolated mitral valve operations (375 repairs, 186 replacements). Mean age was 58.3 years (range, 14 to 96 years; 30.1% > 70 years), and 15.4% of patients had previous cardiac operations. Arterial cannulation was femoral in 79.0% and central in 21%, with the port access balloon endo-occlusion used in 82.3%. Cardioplegia was transjugular retrograde (54.1%) or antegrade (29.4%). Right anterior minithoracotomy was used in 96.6% and left posterior minithoracotomy in 2.2%. RESULTS: Hospital mortality for primary isolated mitral valve repair was 1.1% and 5.8% for isolated mitral valve replacement. Overall hospital mortality was 4.2% (30 of 714). Mean cross-clamp time was 92 minutes and mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 127 minutes. Postoperatively, median ventilation time was 11 hours, intensive care unit time was 19 hours, and total hospital stay was 6 days. Complications for all patients included permanent neurologic deficit (2.9%), aortic dissection (0.3%); there was no mediastinal infection (0.0%). Follow-up echocardiography demonstrated 89.1% of the repair patients had only trace or no residual mitral insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the minimally invasive port access approach to mitral valve operations is reproducible with low perioperative morbidity and mortality and with late outcomes that are equivalent to conventional operations.     

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using three-dimensional video and robotic assistance.

Different techniques have been developed for the common goal to minimize surgical trauma for mitral valve surgery. This article focuses on Port-Access (Heartport, Inc, Redwood City, CA) mitral valve replacement or repair (PAMVR) with emphasis on three-dimensional video and robotic assistance. PAMVR was undertaken using a small right anterior minithoracotomy using an endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) system. A three-dimensional minicamera allowed visualization of the mitral valve apparatus during this limited access surgery. The three-dimensional (3D) image was displayed inside a helmet just above the real surgical image (VISTA system [Vista, Inc, Westborough, MA]). In addition, the camera was attached to a robotic arm (AESOP [Computer Motion, Inc, Goleta, CA]) that allows stabilization and voice-activated movement of the camera. Fifty patients (16 men, 34 women), aged 36 to 77 years (median, 61.5 years) underwent PAMVR. The underlying diseases were mitral valve insufficiency (n = 36) and combined mitral valve disease (n = 14). With optimal visualization, mitral valve repair was performed in 26 patients with quadrangular resection of the posterior leaflet (n = 26) and repair of the anterior leaflet (n = 3) together with insertion of a posterior or complete anuloplasty ring. The valve was replaced in 24 patients with a mechanical valve prosthesis. Intraoperative and postoperative mortality was 0%. One patient (2%) needed reoperation after a failed repair of an anterior leaflet prolaps. Three-month follow-up was complete in 40 patients, with 34 patients (85%) in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I and 6 patients in class II. In conclusion, using 3D video and robotic assistance, it was possible to minimize the length of skin incision but at the same time to optimally visualize the whole mitral valve apparatus to perform true Port-Access mitral valve surgery, including complex repair techniques.     

Minimally invasive, robotic, and off-pump mitral valve surgery

A significant transformation is occurring in the management of mitral valve disease. Earlier surgery is now recommended. Mitral valve repair is the standard of care, and newer methods of reconstructing the mitral valve are developing. Surgery with videoscopic assistance can be effectively performed without sternotomy. Robotics systems are gaining wider adoption. Implantable devices to repair or replace the mitral valve off-pump and percutaneously are emerging.     

Minimally invasive valve surgery

As alternatives to standard sternotomy, surgeons have developed innovative, minimally invasive approaches to conducting valve surgery. Through very small skin incisions and partial upper sternal division for aortic valve surgery and right minithoracotomy for mitral surgery, surgeons have become adept at performing complex valve procedures. Beyond cosmetic appeal, apparent benefits range from decreased pain and bleeding to improved respiratory function and recovery time. The large retrospective studies and few small prospective randomized studies are herein briefly summarized. The focus is then directed toward describing specific intraoperative technical details in current clinical use, covering anesthetic preparation, incision, mediastinal access, cardiovascular cannulation, valve exposure, and valve reconstruction. Finally, unique situations such as pulmonic valve surgery, reoperations, beating heart surgery, and robotics are discussed.     

Minimally invasive valve surgery

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery has been the last area of clinical surgery to adopt and embrace minimally invasive surgical techniques. Since the onset of arterial embolectomy in 1965, arthroscopic knee surgery performed in 1975 and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1985, huge advances in videoscopic, thorascopic and small incision surgery has taken place in all specialties which now allow change in the traditional approaches to cardiac valve surgery. In 1996, the Brigham and Women's Hospital, along with other units, began minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery for patients who had isolated valve pathology without coronary disease. Our experience now totals 689 patients, including 353 minimally invasive mitral valve repair/replacements and 336 minimally invasive aortic valve replacements, including root replacement and reoperations. METHODS: This new operative approach involves smaller incisions, the mandatory use of transesophageal echocardiogram for the monitoring of operation quality and air removal, newer perfusion techniques and some modifications in the standard valve repair/replacement techniques. With this blending of TEE, better perfusion techniques and new exposure, the safety and quality of valve operations by these techniques have been excellent. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The operative mortality is equal to (AVR) or less than (MVP) conventional open sternotomy cases and there is a shorter length of stay in the ICU and post-ICU, leading to a lower cost than conventional procedures. There are also less blood transfusions, atrial fibrillation and posthospital rehabilitation requirements, and patients have indicated that there is a faster return to normality over the conventional operative approaches. This brief report summarizes our experience from July, 1996 to January 2001.     

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery after failed transcatheter mitral valve repair in an intermediate-risk cohort

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESAlthough clinical experience with transcatheter mitral valve interventions is rapidly increasing, there is still a lack of evidence regarding surgical treatment options for the management of recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR). This study provides guidance for a minimally invasive surgical approach following failed transcatheter mitral valve repair, which is based on the underlying mitral valve (MV) pathology and the type of intervention.METHODSA total of 46 patients who underwent minimally invasive MV surgery due to recurrent or residual MR after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair or direct interventional annuloplasty between October 2014 and March 2021 were included.RESULTSThe median age of the patients was 78 [interquartile range, 71–82] years and the EuroSCORE II was 4.41 [interquartile range, 2.66–6.55]. At the index procedure, edge-to-edge repair had been performed in 45 (97.8%) patients and direct annuloplasty in 1 patient. All patients with functional MR at the index procedure (n = 36) underwent MV replacement. Of the patients with degenerative MR (n = 10), 5 patients were eligible for MV repair after removal of the MitraClip. The 1-year survival following surgical treatment was 81.3% and 75.0% in patients with functional and degenerative MR, respectively. No residual MR greater than mild during follow-up was observed in patients who underwent MV repair.CONCLUSIONSMinimally invasive surgery following failed transcatheter mitral valve repair is feasible and safe, with promising midterm survival. The surgical management should be tailored to the underlying valve pathology at the index procedure, the extent of damage of the MV leaflets and the type of previous intervention.