Balsalazide: a review of its therapeutic use in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis

The aminosalicylate balsalazide is a prodrug which is metabolised by bacterial azo reductases in the colon to release its therapeutically active moiety mesalazine [mesalamine (US) or 5-aminosalicylic acid] and an inert carrier molecule. The systemic absorption of balsalazide and its metabolites is not required for the therapeutic efficacy of the drug, and has been demonstrated to be limited. Data from well designed trials with a duration of 8 to 12 weeks show that oral balsalazide 6.75 g/day is as effective as (two trials) or more effective than (one trial) oral delayed-release (pH-dependent) mesalazine 2.4 g/day and appears to be as effective as oral sulfasalazine 3 g/day in the treatment of active mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. In addition, balsalazide appears to have a faster onset of action than mesalazine. Furthermore, balsalazide was as effective as delayed-release mesalazine (dosages used were 1.2 and 1.5 g/day, where 1.6 g/day is recommended) and oral sulfasalazine 2 g/day (recommended dosage) in the prevention of relapse in ulcerative colitis in remission after 6 to 12 months of treatment; the balsalazide dosage was 3 g/day versus mesalazine and 2 g/day versus sulfasalazine. Although not well established, additional benefits may be achieved with balsalazide dosages up to 6 g/day. Data from well designed, 2- to 12-month trials show that balsalazide is well tolerated by patients with ulcerative colitis in both acute and maintenance indications, and is better tolerated than standard formulations of sulfasalazine at therapeutically relevant dosages. CONCLUSION: Balsalazide is a well tolerated and effective first-line therapeutic option for patients with ulcerative colitis, both for the treatment of active mild-to-moderate disease and as maintenance therapy to prevent disease relapse.     

Prolonged-release mesalazine: a review of its therapeutic potential in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease

Prolonged-release mesalazine (Pentasa) consists of ethylcellulose-coated microgranules from which mesalazine (known in the US as mesalamine) is released in the small and large intestine in a diffusion-dependent manner. Dose-dependent improvements in clinical and endoscopic parameters have been reported with prolonged-release mesalazine 2 and 4 g/day in clinical trials in patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis. Induction of clinical and endoscopic remission was achieved in more patients receiving a daily dosage of 4 g/day than in those receiving placebo. In patients with ulcerative colitis in remission, prolonged-release mesalazine is effective in reducing the rate of relapse. Higher dosages tend to be more effective, and a 12-month remission rate of 64% has been reported for patients treated with a 4 g daily dosage of this formulation. Comparative data indicate that prolonged-release mesalazine has similar efficacy in maintaining remission to molar equivalent doses of sulfasalazine. Data from a study in patients with mild to moderately active Crohn's disease indicates that higher dosages (4 g/day) of prolonged-release mesalazine are more effective than placebo in reducing disease activity. After 16 weeks' treatment, 64% of patients receiving a 4 g/day dosage experienced clinical improvement and 43% attained remission. In studies of patients in remission of Crohn's disease, the formulation appears to be more effective in preventing relapse in patients with isolated small bowel disease than in those with colonic involvement. The tolerability profile of oral prolonged-release mesalazine is similar to that of placebo and the incidence of adverse events does not appear to be dose-related. Nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea, abdominal pain and dyspepsia occur most frequently, although their incidence is low. Reports of nephrotoxicity during prolonged-release mesalazine treatment are rare. Conclusions: Oral prolonged-release mesalazine is effective for maintenance and induction of remission of mild to moderately active colitis, both in patients with distal disease and in those with pancolitis. The formulation has similar efficacy to that of equimolar concentrations of sulfasalazine. Prolonged-release mesalazine also appears to be effective in the treatment of Crohn's disease, and maintenance therapy is of particular value in patients with isolated small bowel involvement. Evidence suggests that higher dosages (3 to 4 g/day) of prolonged-release mesalazine have additional therapeutic benefits over lower dosages in patients with inflammatory bowel disease without increasing the incidence of adverse events.     

MMX mesalazine for the induction of remission of mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis: efficacy and tolerability in specific patient subpopulations

Background  Two phase III studies have evaluated mesalazine (mesalamine) with MMX (Multi Matrix System) technology in patients with active mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis.
Aim  To determine the efficacy of MMX mesalazine for the induction of clinical and endoscopic remission in specific subgroups of patients with active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis.
Methods  Data from two double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were analysed (517 out-patients). Patients were randomized to receive MMX mesalazine [2.4 g/day (once daily or 1.2 g twice daily) or 4.8 g/day (once daily)] or placebo for 8 weeks.
Results  The percentages of patients treated with MMX mesalazine, 2.4 or 4.8 g/day, in clinical and endoscopic remission at week 8 were similar and significantly ( P  < 0.05) greater than placebo in subgroups stratified by disease extent, disease severity and gender and among patients not previously receiving low-dose 5-aminosalicylic acid. Among patients transferring directly from prior low-dose oral 5-aminosalicylic acid, MMX mesalazine 4.8 g/day was significantly ( P  = 0.018) more effective than placebo in inducing clinical and endoscopic remission. Efficacy over placebo did not reach significance in patients transferring directly to MMX mesalazine 2.4 g/day.
Conclusion  MMX mesalazine is effective in active UC regardless of disease extent, disease severity, gender and previous, low-dose, 5-ASA therapy.     

Review article: new developments in the use of 5-aminosalicylic acid in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Sulphasalazine is composed of sulphapyridine and mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid, 5-ASA or mesalazine) joined by an azo bond. Sulphasalazine has been used clinically for 40 years but less than 10 years ago it was recognized that the active moiety is 5-ASA. Sulphapyridine appears to act only as a carrier molecule to deliver mesalazine to the bowel, yet it is the sulphapyridine which appears to be responsible for many of the adverse effects observed with sulphasalazine. Normally, mesalazine is rapidly absorbed from the upper gastrointestinal tract. Since the action of mesalazine is thought to be locally at the site of disease in the intestine, the 5-ASA must be 'protected' to ensure its release in the terminal ileum and colon, the site of bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. Recent clinical studies have confirmed the efficacy of topical (suppositories and enemas) therapy for ulcerative proctitis and left-sided colitis; oral mesalazine has been proven to be useful for the treatment of acute ulcerative colitis and for the maintenance of remission. There is preliminary evidence for the clinical usefulness of mesalazine in acute Crohn's disease as well as for the maintenance of remission.     

Oral versus combination mesalazine therapy in active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized multicentre study

BACKGROUND: Oral and topical mesalazine formulations are effective in active ulcerative colitis, but little is known on the efficacy of combined treatment. AIM: To compare the efficacy of oral mesalazine vs. combined oral and topical mesalazine in mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis (Clinical Activity Index, CAI 4-12) were identified at 15 participating centres. They were randomized to receive either mesalazine 4 g orally plus placebo enema, or mesalazine 2 g orally plus mesalazine 2 g rectally as a liquid enema for 6 weeks. The rate of clinical remission (CAI < 4) or clinical remission/improvement (reduction of CAI of 50% from baseline) at 6 weeks and time to clinical remission/improvement were primary end-points; the rate of endoscopic remission was a secondary end-point. RESULTS: 67 patients were assigned to oral treatment and 63 to combined treatment. One patient in the oral group and 2 in the combined group discontinued the treatment due to adverse events. Following an intention-to-treat analysis, the rate of clinical remission was 82% for oral treatment and 87% for combined treatment (P=0.56); the mean time to remission 22.2 and 20.2 days, respectively (P=0.29); the rate of clinical remission/improvement and the rate of endoscopic remission were 85% and 91% (P=0.503) and 58% and 71% (P=0.21), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild active ulcerative colitis, mesalazine 4 g orally and 2 g orally plus 2 g enema are equally effective in inducing disease remission.     

Mesalazine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in chronic inflammatory bowel disease

Mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid; mesalamine), the active moiety of sulphasalazine (salazosulfapyridine), is available in specially formulated oral and rectal forms for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis of mild to moderate severity and for maintenance therapy during disease remission. Tablets or capsules coated with acrylic-based resin and tablets containing microgranules coated with ethylcellulose deliver mesalazine to the distal small intestine and colon, thus avoiding the need for the carrier, sulphapyridine, which is responsible for many of the adverse effects associated with sulphasalazine. Since mesalazine is released in the small intestine from some coated preparations in contrast to sulphasalazine, these oral formulations have therapeutic potential in Crohn's disease. A limited number of therapeutic trials suggest that orally administered mesalazine 1.5 to 2.4g daily is of similar efficacy to sulphasalazine 2 to 3g daily in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. The efficacy of mesalazine enemas has been more widely investigated, a dose of 1 to 4g once daily being consistently more effective than placebo and apparently similar to enemas of prednisone 25mg or oral sulphasalazine 3g. Initial results suggest that mesalazine 4g enemas may be more effective than those containing hydrocortisone 100mg. Mesalazine and sulphasalazine in approximately equivalent oral dosages are similarly effective in maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis. Orally administered coated mesalazine is generally well tolerated by about 85% of patients allergic to or intolerant of sulphasalazine, the remainder experiencing similar reactions to both drugs. Adverse effects of mesalazine enemas are confined to local irritation and effects resulting from enema-tip insertion. Thus, orally administered coated mesalazine is a suitable alternative to sulphasalazine in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate active distal ulcerative colitis and for maintaining remission particularly in patients allergic to or intolerant of sulphasalazine. In patients who find enema therapy acceptable, mesalazine enemas are effective and well tolerated.     

Delayed-release Multi Matrix System (MMX) mesalazine: in ulcerative colitis

* Mesalazine appears to act locally on the mucosa of the colon and reduces the inflammation associated with ulcerative colitis. * Following oral administration, the majority (*78%) of a dose of delayed-release Multi Matrix System (MMX) mesalazine passes unabsorbed through the upper gastrointestinal tract to reach and traverse the entire length of the colon. * In a well designed phase III trial in patients with active, mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (n = 262), significantly (p < 0.01) more MMX mesalazine 2.4 (34%) or 4.8 g/day (29%) recipients than placebo recipients (13%) achieved clinical and endoscopic remission after 8 weeks of treatment.* In a second phase III trial (n = 341), clinical and endoscopic remission rates with MMX mesalazine 2.4 (40.5%) and 4.8 g/day (41.2%) were significantly (p < 0.01) greater than with placebo (22.1%) after 8 weeks, while the remission rate with non-MMX delayed-release mesalazine (Asacol) [32.6%] did not differ from placebo.* Overall, MMX mesalazine was generally well tolerated in controlled clinical trials, with a similar incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in placebo (66%) and MMX mesalazine (56%) recipients in a pooled analysis; most adverse events were of mild or moderate severity. Two of 434 MMX mesalazine recipients experienced serious adverse events that were considered treatment related (pancreatitis caused by mesalazine sensitivity).     

Review article: increasing the dose of oral mesalazine therapy for active ulcerative colitis does not improve remission rates

BACKGROUND: Oral mesalazine (mesalamine, 5-aminosalicylic acid) formulations are effective in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. All formulations contain the same active drug but differ with regard to mechanisms to deliver the drug to the colon. Patients who fail to respond to initial therapy are often administered higher doses of the same formulation. AIM: To review published trials of oral mesalazine formulations in treating active ulcerative colitis and to examine the effect of dose escalation on remission rates. RESULTS: Increasing the doses of oral mesalazine formulations does not result in higher remission rates, although increasing the doses of some formulations has been effective in increasing symptomatic improvement and/or response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Because oral mesalazine formulations do not demonstrate a significant dose response with regard to induction of remission of active ulcerative colitis, simple dose escalation may not be the most effective course for patients who fail to respond to initial mesalazine treatment.     

Systematic review: short-term adverse effects of 5-aminosalicylic acid agents in the treatment of ulcerative colitis

AIM: To determine whether there is a difference in short-term adverse events in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with mesalazine, olsalazine or balsalazide. METHODS: MEDLINE was searched for articles published until 2002. Randomized trials of oral mesalazine, olsalazine or balsalazide for the treatment of active disease or the maintenance of remission were included. Outcomes of interest were the frequencies of patients experiencing adverse events and those withdrawn due to adverse events. RESULTS: Forty-six trials were included. One study of mesalazine vs. sulfasalazine for active colitis showed significantly fewer patients with adverse events with mesalazine. Both balsalazide vs. sulfasalazine studies for active disease showed significantly fewer withdrawals with balsalazide. One trial of balsalazide vs. sulfasalazine for maintenance showed significantly fewer patients with adverse events with balsalazide. Otherwise, no significant differences in safety outcomes were noted. CONCLUSION: All three 5-aminosalicylic acid agents are safe in the short term. In mesalazine-treated patients, the frequencies of adverse events or withdrawals due to adverse events were comparable with those in placebo-treated patients and lower than those in sulfasalazine-treated patients. Overall, adverse events or withdrawals were not significantly more frequent with olsalazine than with placebo or sulfasalazine. Adverse events and study withdrawals on balsalazide were less frequent than those on sulfasalazine.     

MMX® Mesalazine: a review of its use in the management of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis

The Multi MatriX system (MMX?) formulation of mesalazine (Lialda?; Mesavancol?; Mezavant?) [henceforth referred to as MMX mesalazine] is an oral, high-dose, once-daily, gastro-resistant, prolonged-release formulation indicated for use in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. Mesalazine has numerous anti-inflammatory effects on the mucosa of the colon, parts of which are frequently inflamed in ulcerative colitis. MMX mesalazine is believed to act topically. Therapy with MMX mesalazine 2.4 or 4.8?g once daily for 8 weeks was superior to placebo in inducing clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. In 12-month maintenance trials, MMX mesalazine 2.4?g/day maintained remission in about two-thirds of patients and was as effective as Asacol? 2.4?g/day (another oral formulation of mesalazine) as maintenance therapy. In general, MMX mesalazine was well tolerated in both short- and long-term clinical trials; its tolerability profile did not differ clinically to that of placebo or Asacol?. The majority of adverse events reported in clinical trials were gastrointestinal in nature. Therefore, MMX mesalazine appears to be a valuable option in the management of patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis.     

Risk-benefit assessment of drugs used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

Although the aetiology of inflammatory bowel disease remains elusive, many agents are available for the control of symptoms and inflammation. Knowledge of drug pharmacology, indications and side effects is essential to ensure the best possible clinical care while minimising toxicity and inappropriate use. Sulfasalazine consists of sulfapyridine linked to mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid) via an azobond. Its use is indicated in the treatment of mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis and in the prevention of relapse in patients with quiescent disease. Patients with mild to moderate colonic or ileocolonic Crohn's disease also benefit from this drug, as do a proportion of patients with isolated small bowel disease. Sulfasalazine has not been uniformly effective in preventing relapse in Crohn's disease, although many clinicians continue its use in patients who respond initially. A high incidence of side effects which limit therapy include intolerance, hypersensitivity reactions and impairment of male infertility. The newer aminosalicylates offer targeted delivery of mesalazine to the bowel, with fewer side effects. Topical mesalazine has proved extremely effective in patients with distal ulcerative colitis; oral forms are effective in the treatment of mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis and in relapse. Both types appear to be effective in the treatment of Crohn's disease, and possibly in preventing relapse. There is no current clinical advantage of one mesalazine preparation over another, nor is there an indication for their use in sulfasalazine-treated patients who have satisfactory response without adverse effects. Corticosteroids are indicated for more severe disease activity where the aminosalicylates have limited efficacy-specifically to induce remission in patients with severe or refractory ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. They should not be used to maintain disease remission or in the prevention of postoperative recurrence. Topical corticosteroids allow their local use in distal colitis with minimal systemic side effects. Long term use is limited by side effects, many of which are dose related, although alternate-day therapy may lessen the incidence. Immunosuppressive agents are beneficial for the treatment of refractory inflammatory bowel disease unresponsive to other medications, and may also facilitate the withdrawal of steroids in refractory patients. Mercaptopurine has an added benefit in the treatment of Crohn's disease fistulae; the role of cyclosporin in bowel disease has not been established and its use cannot currently be recommended. The potential toxicity of immunosuppressive agents warrants careful consideration of their use by both physician and patient. Metronidazole is indicated for the treatment of mild to moderate Crohn's disease, including perineal disease. Common side effects include peripheral neuropathy and nausea.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Review article: balsalazide therapy in ulcerative colitis

Balsalazide is a 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalazine) pro-drug which has an inert carrier molecule instead of the sulfapyridine moiety of sulfasalazine. It is designed to deliver 5-aminosalicylic acid to the colonic mucosa without the sulfapyridine-associated side-effects encountered with sulfasalazine. Several studies have confirmed the efficacy and patient tolerance of balsalazide. When compared to mesalazine at equivalent doses, it induced symptomatic and complete remission of acute ulcerative colitis in a greater proportion of patients. In particular, patients with resistant left-sided disease were shown to have a higher probability of achieving remission. Balsalazide was beneficial in patients with troublesome nocturnal symptoms. It has a similar efficacy in maintaining remission when compared to sulfasalazine and mesalazine. The advantage of balsalazide over other 5-aminosalicylic acid compounds is its superior patient tolerability with minimal side-effects.     

Efficacy of Lactobacillus GG in maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: Aminosalicylates are the mainstay of therapy to prevent relapse of quiescent ulcerative colitis. The rationale for using probiotics is based on the evidence implicating intestinal bacteria in the pathogenesis of this disorder. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of Lactobacillus GG alone or in combination with mesalazine vs. mesalazine as maintenance treatment in ulcerative colitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 187 ulcerative colitis patients with quiescent disease were randomized to receive Lactobacillus GG 18 x 10(9) viable bacteria/day (65 patients), mesalazine 2400 mg/day (60 patients) or Lactobacillus GG + mesalazine (62 patients). Disease activity index, endoscopic and histological scores were determined at 0, 6 and 12 months and in case of relapse. The primary end point was to evaluate sustained remission. RESULTS: Overall analysis showed no difference in relapse rate at 6 (P = 0.44) and 12 months (P = 0.77) among the three treatment groups. However, the treatment with Lactobacillus GG seems to be more effective than standard treatment with mesalazine in prolonging the relapse-free time (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Lactobacillus GG seems to be effective and safe for maintaining remission in patients with ulcerative colitis, and it could represent a good therapeutic option for preventing relapse in this group of patients.     

Once daily MMX mesalazine for the treatment of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a phase II, dose-ranging study

Background SPD476 (MMX? mesalazine), is a novel, once daily, high‐strength mesalazine formulation (1.2 g/tablet) that utilizes Multi Matrix System? (MMX) technology to delay and extend delivery of the active drug throughout the colon. Aim To assess the safety and efficacy of MMX mesalazine in patients with mild‐to‐moderately active ulcerative colitis, in a pilot, phase II, randomized, multicentre, double‐blind, parallel‐group, dose‐ranging study (SPD476‐202). Methods Thirty‐eight patients with mild‐to‐moderately active ulcerative colitis were randomized to MMX mesalazine 1.2, 2.4 or 4.8 g/day given once daily for 8 weeks. Remission ulcerative colitis‐disease activity index (UC‐DAI) ≤1, a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and stool frequency, and ≥1‐point reduction in sigmoidoscopy score from baseline was the primary end point. Results Week 8 remission rates were 0%, 31% and 18% of patients receiving MMX mesalazine 1.2, 2.4 and 4.8 g/day respectively. No statistically significant difference in remission was observed between treatment groups. MMX mesalazine 2.4 and 4.8 g/day groups demonstrated greater improvement in overall UC‐DAI and component scores from baseline, compared with the 1.2 g/day group. Conclusion MMX mesalazine given as 2.4 or 4.8 g/day once daily is well tolerated and effective for the treatment of mild‐to‐moderately active ulcerative colitis.     

Comparison of two different daily dosages (2.4 vs. 1.2 g) of oral mesalazine in maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis patients: 1-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND: Mesalazine as maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis is used worldwide and has been proven to be effective. However, the optimal dosage remains to be defined. AIM: To establish whether daily treatment with 2.4 g of oral mesalazine is more effective than 1.2 g in preventing disease relapse. METHODS: A total of 156 patients with ulcerative colitis in remission were randomly treated for 1 year with 2.4 (n = 80) or 1.2 (n = 76) g/day of mesalazine. Activity of disease was assessed by periodical clinical, endoscopic and histological examinations. RESULTS: After 12 months, 24 of 80 patients (30%) on 2.4 g and 20 of 76 patients (26%) on 1.2 g were still in remission (P = N.S.). Patients in 2.4 g group remained in remission for a longer time than those in 1.2 g group (P < 0.001). Among clinical variables considered in the study, course of disease prior to enrollment (< or = 3 or > 3 relapses/year) was found to influence response to therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A daily dosage of 2.4 g of oral mesalazine seems to better at preventing and delaying relapses of ulcerative colitis than 1.2 g. The course of disease seems to be crucial in choosing the optimal dosage of mesalazine in a maintenance regimen.     

MMX Multi Matrix System mesalazine for the induction of remission in patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a combined analysis of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials

BACKGROUND: MMX mesalazine [LIALDA (US), MEZAVANT XL (UK and Ireland) MEZAVANT (elsewhere)] utilizes MMX Multi Matrix System (MMX) technology which delivers mesalazine throughout the colon. Two phase III studies have already evaluated MMX mesalazine in patients with active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Aim To provide more precise estimates of the efficacy of MMX mesalazine over placebo by combining the patient populations from the two phase III studies. Methods Combined data from two 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were analyzed. Patients randomized to MMX mesalazine 2.4 g/day (once daily or 1.2 g twice daily), 4.8 g/day (once daily) or placebo were reviewed. The primary end point was clinical and endoscopic remission (modified Ulcerative Colitis-Disease Activity Index of /=1-point reduction in sigmoidoscopy score from week 0). Results Data from 517 patients were analysed. 8-week remission rates were 37.2% and 35.1% in the MMX mesalazine 2.4 g/day and 4.8 g/day groups, vs. 17.5% on placebo (P < 0.001, both comparisons). 8-week complete mucosal healing rates were 32% in both MMX mesalazine groups compared with 16% on placebo. Adverse event frequency was similar in all groups. Conclusion MMX mesalazine is effective and generally well tolerated for inducing clinical and endoscopic remission of active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis.     

Chemistry,Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics,and Clinical Applications of Mesalamine for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Mesalamine is the therapeutically active moiety of sulfasalazine used to treat inflammatory bowel disease. A controlled-release mesalamine capsule (Pentasa) is designed to release the agent continuously, and largely unaffected by intestinal pH, throughout the small and large bowel due to a diffusion-dependent, semipermeable ethylcellulose coating. It is a safe and efficacious single agent for inducing remission and producing therapeutic benefit in patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC) (2 or 4 g/day) or Crohn's disease (4 g/day), as well as for significantly enhancing quality of life for patients with mild to moderately active UC (2 or 4 g/day). It is also effective for maintaining remission in patients with quiescent UC and Crohn's disease (4 g/day). Disease location (left-sided UC or pancolitis) did not affect the agent's effect in active disease or maintaining remission. Fewer treatment-related adverse events were reported with mesalamine than with placebo in treating UC. In the treatment of active Crohn's disease, data showed no statistically significant differences in response for patients with ileitis, ileocolitis, or Crohn's colitis. This formulation of mesalamine may also be a possible steroid-sparing agent for patients with either active or quiescent Crohn's disease.     

Efficacy and tolerability of mesalazine foam enema (Salofalk foam) for distal ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: Rectal formulations of mesalazine are the treatment of choice in mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. A new foam formulation of mesalazine was developed to improve both drug delivery and patient acceptance. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, 111 patients with mildly to moderately active proctitis, proctosigmoiditis, or left-sided ulcerative colitis received mesalazine foam enema or placebo enema (2 g mesalazine per day) for 6 weeks. Disease activity was monitored on the basis of the Clinical Activity Index, Endoscopic Index, Histological Index, and global efficacy assessment by the investigators. Safety assessments included the recording of adverse events, laboratory variables and vital signs. RESULTS: Clinical remission was more frequent in the mesalazine group than the placebo group (65% vs. 40%; P=0.0082), particularly in patients with mild disease and patients with proctosigmoiditis. The frequency of patients with an endoscopic remission was higher in the mesalazine group (57%) than in the placebo group (37%). Similarly, 59% of patients receiving mesalazine but only 41% of those receiving placebo showed an improved Histological Index. The foam enemas were generally well-tolerated, and no treatment-related changes on laboratory variables and vital signs were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Mesalazine foam enema was well-tolerated and was more effective than placebo in the treatment of patients with distal ulcerative colitis.     

Systematic review: the use of mesalazine in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND: Mesalazine is among the medications most commonly prescribed by gastroenterologists, having to a large extent superseded sulfasalazine (sulphasalazine). However, there are still a number of aspects regarding its use which provoke debate and controversy. AIM: To provide a systematic assessment of the evidence for the use of mesalazine in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. METHODS: References were identified using PubMed database. Additional references were identified with related article searches. RESULTS: Mesalazine has a clear role in the maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis and management of mild to moderately active disease, although the efficacy of topical preparations or combined topical and oral is clearly superior to oral alone. Evidence that increasing the dose of oral mesalazine improves efficacy is not clear-cut. The benefits of mesalazine in the management of acute Crohn's disease and the maintenance of remission are questionable and alternative treatments are usually more appropriate. Emerging evidence suggests that maintenance mesalazine reduces the risk of neoplastic progression in chronic ulcerative colitis. Compliance with therapy is thus important, as is an understanding of individuals most likely to default on this. CONCLUSION: Evidence for a beneficial effect of mesalazine is largely confined to the management of ulcerative colitis.     

Oral beclometasone dipropionate in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind placebo-controlled study

AIM: To evaluate efficacy and safety of oral beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) when added to 5-ASA in the treatment of patients with active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: In a 4-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, patients with extensive or left-sided mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis were randomized to receive oral 5-ASA (3.2 g/day) plus BDP (5 mg/day) or placebo. Clinical, endoscopic and histologic features, and haematochemical parameters were recorded at baseline and at the end of the study. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients were enrolled and randomly treated with BDP plus 5-ASA (n = 58) or placebo plus 5-ASA (n = 61). Both treatment groups showed a statistically significant decrease of disease activity index (DAI) and histology score at the end of treatment (P = 0.001, each). DAI score was lower in the BDP group than in the placebo group (P = 0.014), with more patients in clinical remission in the BDP group (58.6% vs. 34.4%, P = 0.008). Serum cortisol levels significantly decreased in BDP group vs. baseline (P = 0.002), but without signs of pituitary-adrenal function depletion. A low incidence of adverse events was observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral BDP in combination with oral 5-ASA is significantly more effective than 5-ASA alone in the treatment of patients with extensive or left-sided active ulcerative colitis.