A comparison of stavudine, didanosine and indinavir with zidovudine, lamivudine and indinavir for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infected individuals: selection of thymidine analog regimen therapy (START II)

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of stavudine (d4T), didanosine (ddI) and indinavir (IDV) with zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC) and IDV in HIV-1 infected patients. DESIGN: Randomized, open-label. SETTING: Fourteen HIV Clinical Research Centers. PATIENTS: Two-hundred and five patients with less than 4 weeks antiretroviral treatment, naive to 3TC and protease inhibitors and with CD4 cell counts > or = 200 x 10(6)/l and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels > or = 10,000 copies/ml. INTERVENTIONS: Stavudine 40 mg and ddI 200 mg twice daily plus IDV 800 mg every 8 h compared with ZDV 200 mg every 8 h or 300 mg twice daily, 3TC 150 mg twice daily plus IDV. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels < 500 copies/ml and < or = 50 copies/ml and changes in CD4 cell counts were compared. RESULTS: In an analysis of the primary endpoint, 61% of patients on d4T + ddI + IDV and 45% of patients on ZDV + 3TC + IDV had all HIV-1 RNA values obtained between weeks 40 and 48 < 500 copies/ml [95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between proportions, 1.7-30.3%; P = 0.038]. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the percentage of all patients randomized with all HIV-1 RNA levels < 500 copies/ml between 40 and 48 weeks were 53% for the d4T + ddI + IDV arm and 41% for the ZDV + 3TC + IDV arm (95% CI, -1.4% to 25.7%; P = 0.068). At 48 weeks 41% and 35% were < or = 50 copies/ml for the stavudine- and ZDV-containing arms respectively (P > 0.2). The median time-weighted average increases in CD4 cells count over 48 weeks were 150 x 10(6)/l cells for the d4T arm and 106 x 10(6)/l cells for the ZDV arm (P= 0.001). The occurrence of serious adverse events was not significantly different between arms. CONCLUSION: The combination of stavudine, ddl and IDV resulted in potent antiretroviral effects over a 48-week period, comparable or superior to zidovudine, 3TC and IDV supporting the use of stavudine, ddI and a protease inhibitor as an initial antiretroviral treatment.     

Effects of treatment intensification with hydroxyurea in HIV-infected patients with virologic suppression

BACKGROUND: Virologic rebound can result from suboptimal antiviral potency in combination antiretroviral therapy. DESIGN: Multicenter, partially blinded, prospective, randomized study of 202 HIV-infected subjects to determine whether therapy intensification improves long-term rates of virologic suppression. METHODS: Subjects had plasma HIV RNA < 200 copies/ml, CD4 cell count of > 200 x 10(6) cells/l, and treatment with indinavir (IDV) + zidovudine (ZDV) + lamivudine (3TC) for at least 6 months before randomization to stay on this regimen or to receive IDV + didanosine (ddI) + stavudine (d4T) plus or minus hydroxyurea (HU) (600 mg twice daily). Treatment failure was defined as either confirmed rebound of HIV RNA level to > 200 copies/ml or a drug toxicity necessitating treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: Treatment failure occurred more frequently in subjects randomized to the HU-containing arm (32.4%), than in those taking IDV + ddI + d4T (17.6%) or IDV + ZDV + 3TC (7.6%). The time to treatment failure was shorter for the HU-containing arm compared with the IDV + ZDV + 3TC (P < 0.0001) or IDV + ddI + d4T arms (P = 0.032). Dose-limiting toxicities rather than virologic rebound accounted for the differences between treatment failure among the study arms. Pancreatitis led to treatment discontinuation in 4% of subjects in treatment arms containing ddI + d4T. Three subjects with pancreatitis died, all randomized to the HU-containing arm. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to IDV + ddI + d4T + HU in patients treated with IDV + ZDV + 3TC was associated with a worse outcome, principally because of drug toxicity.     

Nucleoside combinations for antiretroviral therapy: efficacy of stavudine in combination with either didanosine or lamivudine

This paper reviews the results of three trials, HIV NAT002, AI455-053, and AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 306, all of which evaluated the effectiveness of stavudine (d4T)-containing two-nucleoside combinations in antiretroviral-naive patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. The latter two studies directly compared d4T plus didanosine (ddI) or lamivudine (3TC) versus zidovudine (ZDV) plus each of these two nucleosides. The combined results of the three trials support the conclusion that d4T can be used effectively in combination with either ddI or 3TC to reduce viral loads and increase CD4 cell counts in patients with HIV-1 infection. The results of AI455-053 and ACTG 306 show further that combination of d4T with either ddI or 3TC is at least as effective as the use of ZDV with these nucleosides.     

Cellular nucleoside pharmacokinetics and pharmacology: a potentially important determinant of antiretroviral efficacy

Among the potential reasons for treatment failure in patients receiving therapy for HIV-1 infection, one that has received only limited attention is intracellular interactions between nucleosides that may reduce their metabolism (phosphorylation) to active forms necessary for antiretroviral activity. Results reviewed in this paper indicate that there is considerable potential for interaction among nucleosides used to suppress viral replication in patients with HIV-1 infection. Zidovudine (ZDV) and zalcitabine (ddC) have both been shown to inhibit their own metabolism. ZDV also inhibits the phosphorylation of stavudine (d4T) and lamivudine (3TC) and increases that of didanosine (ddI). d4T has been shown to slightly decrease the phosphorylation of ZDV. ddC decreases the formation of triphosphates of both d4T and 3TC, and 3TC decreases the phosphorylation of ddC. ddI has no significant effects on the intracellular metabolism of any of the nucleoside analogues currently used to treat patients with HIV-1 disease. Thus, the pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral agents and intracellular phosphorylation/activation of nucleosides may be important determinants of the virologic and clinical effectiveness of therapy. They must be considered along with characteristics of the virus, such as phenotypic and genotypic resistance, and those of the patient, including motivation to adhere to therapy, in individualizing antiretroviral treatment regimens for individuals with HIV-1 disease.     

Absence of zidovudine resistance in antiretroviral-naive patients following zidovudine/lamivudine/protease inhibitor combination therapy: virological evaluation of the AVANTI 2 and AVANTI 3 studies

OBJECTIVES: To assess the role of resistance mutations in subjects experiencing virological failure on zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC) combined with a protease inhibitor (PI) to those failing on ZDV/3TC alone. DESIGN AND METHODS: Samples were obtained from previously antiretroviral therapy-naive subjects enrolled into two studies, AVANTI 2 and AVANTI 3. Subjects were randomized to receive either: ZDV/3TC or ZDV/3TC plus indinavir (IDV) for 52 weeks (AVANTI 2), and ZDV/3TC or ZDV/3TC and nelfinavir (NFV) for 28 weeks (AVANTI 3). Emergence of viral resistance mutations was monitored by population sequencing and phenotypic resistance was determined by the recombinant virus assay. RESULTS: Genotypic data were obtained for subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA > 400 copies/ml. In AVANTI 2, ZDV mutations were detected in 27% of ZDV/3TC-treated patients at week 52, but were absent in subjects treated with ZDV/3TC/IDV. No subjects from either arm of AVANTI 3 developed ZDV resistance mutations at week 28. The M184V mutation developed in most ZDV/3TC-treated subjects from both studies. The presence of M184V was, however, associated with significantly lower plasma viral RNA levels when compared with values obtained before initiation of treatment. There was a high frequency (4 of 11) of the protease L10F substitution in ZDV/3TC/IDV-treated patients that was associated with virological failure but did not result in phenotypic resistance to any of the PIs tested. CONCLUSIONS: ZDV mutations were not detected in ZDV/3TC/PI-treated patients and they developed slowly in those treated with ZDV/3TC. Few protease mutations known to confer phenotypic PI resistance developed in the ZDV/3TC/PI arms of either study. The low prevalence of ZDV and PI mutations is encouraging regarding the future treatment options of these patients.     

Lamivudine in combination with zidovudine, stavudine, or didanosine in patients with HIV-1 infection. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 306 Investigators.

OBJECTIVE: To study the antiviral activity of lamivudine (3TC) plus zidovudine (ZDV), didanosine (ddl), or stavudine (d4T). DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, partially double-blinded multicenter study. SETTING: Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Units. PATIENTS: Treatment-naive HIV-infected adults with 200-600x10(6) CD4 T lymphocytes/l. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were openly randomized to a d4T or a ddl limb, then randomized in a blinded manner to receive: d4T (80 mg/day), d4T plus 3TC (300 mg/day), or ZDV (600 mg/day) plus 3TC, with matching placebos; or ddl (400 mg/day), ddl plus 3TC (300 mg/day), or ZDV (600 mg/day) plus 3TC, with matching placebos. After 24 weeks 3TC was added for patients assigned to the monotherapy arms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The reduction in plasma HIV-1 RNA level at weeks 24 and 48.RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine patients were enrolled. After 24 weeks the mean reduction in plasma HIV-1 RNA copies/ml from baseline was 0.49 log10 (d4T monotherapy) versus 1.03 log10 (d4T plus 3TC; P = 0.001), and 0.68 log10 (ddl monotherapy) versus 0.82 log10 (ddl plus 3TC; P>0.22). After 48 weeks the mean reduction was 1.08 log10 (d4T plus 3TC) versus 1.01 log10 (ZDV plus 3TC) in the d4T limb (P = 0.66), and 0.94 log10 (ddl plus 3TC) versus 0.88 log10 (ZDV plus 3TC; P = 0.70) in the ddl limb. CONCLUSIONS: 3TC added significantly to the virologic effects of d4T, but not ddl, in treatment-naive patients. 3TC plus d4T produced virologic changes comparable to those of 3TC plus ZDV. These results support the use of 3TC with either ZDV or d4 as a component of initial combination antiretroviral therapy.     

Presence of M184I/V in minor HIV-1 populations of patients with lamivudine and/or didanosine treatment failure

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the presence of M184I/V in minor HIV-1 populations of patients who failed lamivudine (3TC) and/or didanosine (ddI) treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen 3TC-experienced patients who, after switching therapy to a ddI regimen, had a new failure without M184I/V in the major viral population were included in the study. Ninety plasma samples were analysed by direct sequencing and selective real-time polymerase chain reaction (SPCR), which detects GTG/GTA and ATA mutants down to 1 and 0.2% of the population, respectively. RESULTS: In five samples, SPCR detected resistant virus when direct sequencing detected wild-type M184. In patients with mixed viral populations at sequencing, the median proportion of mutants detected by SPCR was 30%. SPCRGTG reactivity dominated, while SPCRATA reactivity only was uncommon. M184I/V disappeared in patients in whom 3TC was stopped but ddI continued. Ten patients with ddI failure had no M184I/V. CONCLUSIONS: Minor HIV-1 strains may harbour M184I/V in patients failing ddI therapy, despite direct sequencing showing wild-type virus. Although M184I/V may reduce the genetic barrier of ddI for mutations such as K65R and L74V, the lack of re-emergence of M184I/V in the minor quasispecies of most patients who failed ddI suggests that M184I/V was not a preferred route to ddI resistance in our patient population.     

The reverse transcriptase 67N 70R 215Y genotype is the predominant TAM pathway associated with virologic failure among HIV type 1C-infected adults treated with ZDV/ddI-containing HAART in southern Africa

HIV-1C has become the dominant HIV-1 subtype in the global AIDS epidemic. Historically, the evolution of drug-resistant mutations was characterized primarily among antiretroviral (ARV)-treated HIV-1B infections. Whereas the non-B viruses are susceptible to the currently used ARVs, some differences between HIV-1 subtypes in response to ARV regimens have been reported. We analyzed the profile of ARV-associated mutations in HIV-1C infection treated with ZDV/ddI-containing regimens in an open-label, randomized 3 x 2 x 2 factorial study comparing ZDV/3TC vs. ZDV/ddI vs. d4T/3TC and EFV vs. NVP regimens in drug-naive adults in Botswana. The overall rate of virologic failure in the ZDV/ddI-containing arms was 14%. We addressed the development of NRTI-associated mutations in 23 virologically failed patients in the ZDV/ddI-containing arms. The 67N 70R 215Y genotype with wild-type amino acids at codon positions 41 and 210 was a dominant pattern of NRTI-associated mutations at the time of virologic failure. The mutation T215Y was the first step in the evolution of the 67N 70R 215Y genotype and was followed by mutations K70R and D67N. Representing a mixture of TAM-1 (41L/210W/215Y) and TAM-2 (67N/70R/215F /219Q) pathways, the 67N 70R 215Y genotype with wild-type amino acids at codon positions 41, 210, and 219 is a unique TAM pathway that is rarely seen in HIV-1B infection. Although limited by relatively small numbers, our data suggest that the 67N 70R 215Y genotype may be the HIV-1C-specific response to the first-line ZDV/ddI-containing regimen at the time of virologic failure. The presence of the 67N 70R 215Y genotype with wild-type amino acids at codon positions 41, 210, and 219 in HIV-1C infection suggests that the evolution of ARV-associated mutations and TAM pathways might be unique in non-B HIV-1 subtypes treated with particular ARV regimens.     

A randomized, dose-finding study with didanosine plus stavudine versus didanosine alone in antiviral-naive, HIV-infected Thai patients

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of four different regimens of didanosine (ddI) + stavudine (d4T) in HIV-infected Thais. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, randomized study. METHODS: Patients were randomized to four regimens of high and low doses of ddI and d4T or to ddI alone. D4T was added to the ddI-alone arm after week 24. The duration of study was 48 weeks. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were randomized (mean CD4 cell count, 255 x 10(6)/l; mean plasma HIV-1 RNA; 4.3 log10 copies/ml). In the intent-to-treat analysis, 78% of patients in the pooled combination arms and 20% of the patients in the ddI alone arm (to which d4T was added after 24 weeks) showed plasma HIV-1 RNA < 500 copies/ml at week 24 (P < 0.001), and 59% versus 53% at week 48, respectively. In addition, the proportion of patients with < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml was 13% versus 7% at week 24 (P = 0.5) and 17% versus 20% at week 48 respectively. At week 24, median CD4 cell count increases from baseline were 101 x 10(6)/l in the pooled combination versus 76 x 10(6)/l in the ddI alone arm (P = 0.78). Logistic regression modeling suggested a correlation between receiving high dose ddI and achieving HIV-1 RNA < 500 copies/ml at week 48 (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: The d4T/ddI combination was superior to ddI alone in producing HIV-1 viral suppression. At week 48, > 60% of patients treated with this combination reached HIV-1 RNA levels < 500 copies/ml. Receiving high dose ddI but not d4T may correlate with a better viral suppression.     

Virological and immunological responses to once-daily dosing of didanosine in combination with stavudine. AI454-143 Team.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the antiviral activity of once-daily didanosine (ddI) and twice-daily ddI in combination with stavudine (d4T). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. SETTING: Twenty-one sites in the United States. PATIENTS: Eighty-seven antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected adults with baseline plasma HIV RNA counts of > or = 10,000 copies/ml and CD4 cell counts of > or = 100 cells/mm3 started study therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received once-daily ddI or twice-daily ddI, each combined with twice-daily d4T. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, CD4 cell counts, and adverse events were regularly monitored. The primary efficacy analysis used was the time-averaged difference (TAD) between treatment regimens in change from baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA levels over the first 12 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: At week 12, median log10 HIV-1 RNA changes were -1.83 log10 copies/ml in the once-daily ddI/d4T group and -1.80 log10 copies/ml in the twice-daily ddI/d4T group, and 18 out of 44 patients (41%) and 17 out of 43 patients (40%), respectively, had HIV-1 RNA levels below 400 copies/ml. Similar results were seen at week 24. The TAD between the two treatment groups (once-daily ddI/d4T minus twice-daily ddI/d4T) in change from baseline plasma HIV RNA levels over the first 12 weeks was 0.14 log10 copies/ml (95% CI: -0.11, 0.40). At week 12, subjects averaged an increase in CD4 cell count of over 140 cells/mm3. The TAD between the two treatment groups in change from baseline CD4 cell counts over the first 12 weeks was 2 cells/mm3 (95% CI: -40, 45). CONCLUSION: Once-daily ddI plus d4T and twice-daily ddI plus d4T were similarly effective in reducing plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and increasing CD4 cell counts over 12-24 weeks of therapy.     

Effect of lamivudine in HIV-infected persons with prior exposure to zidovudine/didanosine or zidovudine/zalcitabine

Nucleoside analog-based regimens remain an integral component of combination therapy for use in both antiretroviral treatment-naive and experienced HIV-infected patients. To further define treatment responses to new antiretroviral therapy in patients with long-term experience to dual nucleoside analog therapy (zidovudine [ZDV] plus didanosine [ddI] or ZDV plus zalcitabine [ddC]), 325 subjects derived from the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 175 trial were randomized to three different combination regimens: (1) continuation of ZDV + ddI or ZDV + ddC (continuation arm), (2) addition of 3TC to ZDV + ddI or ZDV + ddC (addition arm), or (3) a switch to ZDV + 3TC therapy (switch arm). Both the addition and switch arms sustained significantly greater short-term (baseline to week 4) mean CD4+ cell count increases compared with the continuation arm (+36, +28 versus -4 cells/mm3; p = 0.012) and long-term CD4+ cell count responses (baseline to weeks 40/48: +32, +19 versus -9 cells/mm3; p = 0.003). Superior short-term (baseline to week 8) mean decreases in plasma HIV RNA (p < 0.001) were achieved by both the addition and switch arms (0.53 log10 and 0.54 log10 copies/ml, respectively) compared with the continuation arm (0.13 copies/ml) whereas no differences in long-term virologic suppression were observed (p = 0.30). At week 48, no differences were observed in the proportions of subjects who had HIV RNA levels below 500 copies/mL: 18% of subjects in each treatment arm (3-way p = 1.0). Overall, the treatments were well tolerated and only nine subjects (3%) died or developed one or more AIDS-defining events. While this study confirms the intrinsic antiretroviral activity of 3TC, only modest marker changes and limited short-term viral suppression are seen with incremental addition of the drug. The current approach of using 3TC in maximally suppressive regimens is preferred.