The effect of dexamethasone on the enteroinsular axis

In order to examine whether hyperinsulinaemia induced glucocorticoid therapy involves alterations of the enteroinsular axis glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon and GIP responses to a test meal with and without prior intake of dexamethasone (2 + 2 mg) in 13 healthy subjects were measured. Dexamethasone caused impaired glucose tolerance, which was associated with an exaggerated insulin (0.61 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.38 +/- 0.05 nmol/l; p less than 0.001). C-peptide (0.97 +/- 0.08 vs. 0.71 +/- 0.06 nmol/l; p less than 0.001) and glucagon response to a test meal. In contrast, the GIP response to the test meal was blunted after dexamethasone (126 +/- 17 vs. 177 +/- 23 pmol/l; p less than 0.001). It therefore follows that alterations in the enteroinsular axis, that is, GIP secretion, cannot be responsible for the enhancement of insulin secretion observed after dexamethasone. The mechanism(s) for the decreased GIP response after dexamethasone could involve (1) a direct inhibitory effect on GIP secretion by dexamethasone, and/or (2) a negative feedback of elevated glucose and insulin levels on GIP secretion.     

Evaluation of beta-cell secretory capacity using glucagon-like peptide 1

OBJECTIVE: Beta-cell secretory capacity is often evaluated with a glucagon test or a meal test. However, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is the most insulinotropic hormone known, and the effect is preserved in type 2 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We first compared the effects of intravenous bolus injections of 2.5, 5, 15, and 25 nmol GLP-1 with glucagon (1 mg intravenous) and a standard meal (566 kcal) in 6 type 2 diabetic patients and 6 matched control subjects. Next, we studied another 6 patients and 6 control subjects and, in addition to the above procedure, performed a combined glucose plus GLP-1 stimulation, where plasma glucose was increased to 15 mmol/l before injection of 2.5 nmol GLP-1. Finally, we compared the insulin response to glucose plus GLP-1 stimulation with that observed during a hyperglycemic arginine clamp (30 mmol/l) in 8 patients and 8 control subjects. RESULTS: Peak insulin and C-peptide concentrations were similar after the meal, after 2.5 nmol GLP-1, and after glucagon. Side effects were less with GLP-1 than with glucagon. Peak insulin and C-peptide concentrations were as follows (C-peptide concentrations are given in parentheses): for patients (n = 12): meal, 277 +/- 42 pmol/l (2,181 +/- 261 pmol/l); GLP-1 (2.5 nmol), 390 +/- 74 pmol/l (2,144 +/- 254 pmol/l); glucagon, 329 +/- 50 pmol/l (1,780 +/- 160 pmol/l); glucose plus GLP-1, 465 +/- 87 pmol/l (2,384 +/- 299 pmol/l); for control subjects (n = 12): meal, 543 +/- 89 pmol/l (2,873 +/- 210 pmol/l); GLP-1, 356 +/- 51 pmol/l (2,001 +/- 130 pmol/l); glucagon, 420 +/- 61 pmol/l (1,995 +/- 99 pmol/l); glucose plus GLP-1, 1,412 +/- 187 pmol/l (4,391 +/- 416 pmol/l). Peak insulin and C-peptide concentrations during the hyperglycemic arginine clamp and during glucose plus GLP-1 injection were as follows: for patients: 475 +/- 141 pmol/l (2,295 +/- 379 pmol/l) and 816 +/- 268 pmol/l (3,043 +/- 508 pmol/l), respectively; for control subjects: 1,403 +/- 308 pmol/l (4,053 +/- 533 pmol/l) and 2,384 +/- 452 pmol/l (6,047 +/- 652 pmol/l), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: GLP-1 (2.5 nmol = 9 microg) elicits similar secretory responses to 1 mg glucagon (but has fewer side effects) and a standard meal. Additional elevation of plasma glucose to 15 mmol/l did not enhance the response further. The incremental response was similar to that elicited by arginine, but hyperglycemia had an additional effect on the response to arginine.     

Diminished insulin secretory response to glucose but normal insulin and glucagon secretory responses to arginine in a family with maternally inherited diabetes and deafness caused by mitochondrial tRNA(LEU(UUR)) gene mutation.

OBJECTIVE: The effects of glucose, arginine, and glucagon on beta-cell function as well as alpha-cell response to arginine were studied in a family with mitochondrial diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The function of alpha- and beta-cells was assessed in all five siblings carrying the mitochondrial tRNA Leu(UUR) gene mutation at position 3243 and compared with six sex-, age-, and weight-matched control subjects. Insulin and C-peptide responses were evaluated by intravenous glucagon application, intravenous arginine stimulation test, and intravenous glucose tolerance test. Glucagon secretion was assessed during the arginine stimulation test. RESULTS: The glucose disappearance constant (K(g)) value (mean +/- SEM 0.61 +/- 0.04 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.04, P = 0.0002) as well as the acute insulin response to glucose (area under the curve [AUC] 0-10 min, 77.7 +/- 50.7 vs. 1,352.3 +/- 191.5 pmol/l, P = 0.0004) were decreased in all patients. Similarly, glucagon-stimulated C-peptide response was also impaired (728 +/- 111.4 vs. 1,526.7 +/- 157.7 pmol/l, P = 0.005), whereas the insulin response to arginine (AUC) was normal (1,346.9 +/- 710.8 vs. 1,083.2 +/- 132.5 pmol/l, P = 0.699). Acute glucagon response to arginine (AUC) was normal but tended to be higher in the patients than in the control subjects (181.7 +/- 47.5 vs. 90.0 +/- 21.1 pmol/l, P = 0.099). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows impaired insulin and C-peptide secretion in response to a glucose challenge and to glucagon stimulation in diabetic patients with mitochondrial tRNA Leu(UUR) gene mutation, although insulin and glucagon secretory responses to arginine were normal.     

Plasma somatostatin and plasma glucagon in long-term IDDM without residual B-cell function. No effect of different long-term metabolic control

To further study the elevated plasma somatostatin (SRIF)--and reduced plasma glucagon concentrations found in IDDM patients without residual B-cell function compared to normal controls, we investigated 39 such patients, randomly assigned to three different insulin treatment regimens; conventional therapy with two injections a day (CTh), insulin pump (CSII) and multiple injections (MI), for 1 year. They were given an arginine infusion (0.5 g/kg/20 min). The mean basal plasma SRIF values in the CTh, CSII and MI groups were 20.8 +/- 3.3, 18.6 +/- 1.8 and 20.6 +/- 2.8 pmol/l and the mean basal plasma glucagon values were 30 +/- 5.7, 19 +/- 2.3 and 27 +/- 4.7 pmol/l, respectively. Both SRIF and glucagon increased in all groups in relation to arginine infusion. For both hormones, the mean values were highest in the CTh group, lowest in the CSII group, although the differences were not significant. The mean HbA1 values for the last 3 months within the test were 10.0 +/- 0.5, 8.8 +/- 0.3 and 9.1 +/- 0.5%, respectively, in the same order as above. The CTh group had significantly higher HbA1 values than the CSII group (p less than 0.02). We conclude that small differences in long-term blood glucose control are of inconsiderable importance for the islet hormonal response to arginine found in IDDM without B-cell function.     

Role of the decrement in intraislet insulin for the glucagon response to hypoglycemia in humans

OBJECTIVE: Animal and in vitro studies indicate that a decrease in beta-cell insulin secretion, and thus a decrease in tonic alpha-cell inhibition by intraislet insulin, may be an important factor for the increase in glucagon secretion during hypoglycemia. However, in humans this role of decreased intraislet insulin is still unclear. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied glucagon responses to hypoglycemia in 14 nondiabetic subjects on two separate occasions. On both occasions, insulin was infused from 0 to 120 min to induce hypoglycemia. On one occasion, somatostatin was infused from -60 to 60 min to suppress insulin secretion, so that the decrement in intraislet insulin during the final 60 min of hypoglycemia would be reduced. On the other occasion, subjects received an infusion of normal saline instead of the somatostatin. RESULTS: During the 2nd h of the insulin infusion, when somatostatin or saline was no longer being infused, plasma glucose ( approximately 2.6 mmol/l) and insulin levels ( approximately 570 pmol/l) were comparable in both sets of experiments (both P > 0.4). In the saline experiments, insulin secretion remained unchanged from baseline (-90 to -60 min) before insulin infusion and decreased from 1.20 +/- 0.12 to 0.16 +/- 0.04 pmol . kg(-1) . min(-1) during insulin infusion (P < 0.001). However, in the somatostatin experiments, insulin secretion decreased from 1.18 +/- 0.12 pmol . kg(-1) . min(-1) at baseline to 0.25 +/- 0.09 pmol . kg(-1) . min(-1) before insulin infusion so that it did not decrease further during insulin infusion (-0.12 +/- 0.10 pmol . kg(-1) . min(-1), P = 0.26) indicating the complete lack of a decrement in intraislet insulin during hypoglycemia. This was associated with approximately 30% lower plasma glucagon concentrations (109 +/- 7 vs. 136 +/- 9 pg/ml, P < 0.006) and increments in plasma glucagon above baseline (41 +/- 8 vs. 67 +/- 11 pg/ml, P < 0.008) during the last 15 min of the hypoglycemic clamp. In contrast, increases in plasma growth hormone were approximately 70% greater during hypoglycemia after somatostatin infusion (P < 0.007), suggesting that to some extent the increases in plasma glucagon might have reflected a rebound in glucagon secretion. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide direct support for the intraislet insulin hypothesis in humans. However, the exact extent to which a decrement in intraislet insulin accounts for the glucagon responses to hypoglycemia remains to be established.     

Differential effects of acute and extended infusions of glucagon-like peptide-1 on first- and second-phase insulin secretion in diabetic and nondiabetic humans

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether an extended infusion of the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) has a greater effect to promote insulin secretion in type 2 diabetic subjects than acute administration of the peptide. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Nine diabetic subjects and nine nondiabetic volunteers of similar age and weight were studied in identical protocols. First-phase insulin release (FPIR; the incremental insulin response in the first 10 min after the intravenous glucose bolus) and second-phase insulin release (SPIR; the incremental insulin response from 10-60 min after intravenous glucose) were measured during three separate intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTTs): 1). without GLP-1 (control); 2). with acute administration of GLP-1 as a square wave starting just before glucose administration; and 3). with an extended infusion of GLP-1 for 3 h before and during the IVGTT. RESULTS: In the subjects with diabetes, FPIR was severely impaired-a defect that was only modestly improved by acute administration of GLP-1 (197 +/- 97 vs. 539 +/- 218 pmol/l. min, P < 0.05), while SPIR was substantially increased (1952 +/- 512 vs. 8072 +/- 1664 pmol/l. min, P < 0.05). In contrast, the 3-h preinfusion of GLP-1 normalized fasting hyperglycemia (7.9 +/- 0.5 vs. 5.2 +/- 0.6, P < 0.05), increased FPIR by 5- to 6-fold (197 +/- 97 vs. 1141 +/- 409 pmol/l. min, P < 0.05), and augmented SPIR significantly (1952 +/- 512 vs. 4026 +/- 851 pmol/l. min, P < 0.05), but to a lesser degree than the acute administration of GLP-1. In addition, only the 3-h GLP-1 preinfusion significantly improved intravenous glucose tolerance (K(g) control 0.61 +/- 0.04, acute infusion 0.71 +/- 0.04, P = NS; 3-h infusion 0.92 +/- 0.08%/min, P < 0.05). These findings were also noted in the nondiabetic subjects in whom acute administration of GLP-1 significantly increased SPIR relative to the control IVGTT (9439 +/- 2885 vs. 31553 +/- 11660 pmol/l. min, P < 0.001) with less effect on FPIR (3221 +/- 918 vs. 4917 +/- 1614 pmol/l. min, P = 0.075), while the 3-h preinfusion of GLP-1 significantly increased both FPIR (3221 +/- 918 vs. 7948 +/- 2647 pmol/l. min, P < 0.01) and SPIR (9439 +/- 2885 vs. 21997 +/- 9849 pmol/l. min, P < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Extended administration of GLP-1 not only augments glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, but also shifts the dynamics of the insulin response to earlier release in both diabetic and nondiabetic humans. The restitution of some FPIR in subjects with type 2 diabetes is associated with significantly improved glucose tolerance. These findings demonstrate the benefits of a 3-h infusion of GLP-1 on beta-cell function beyond those of an acute insulin secretagogue, and support the development of strategies using continuous or prolonged GLP-1 receptor agonism for treating diabetic patients.     

Epinephrine supports the postabsorptive plasma glucose concentration and prevents hypoglycemia when glucagon secretion is deficient in man.

We hypothesized that adrenergic mechanisms support the postabsorptive plasma glucose concentration, and prevent hypoglycemia when glucagon secretion is deficient. Accordingly, we assessed the impact of glucagon deficiency, produced by infusion of somatostatin with insulin, without and with pharmacologic alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade on the postabsorptive plasma glucose concentration and glucose kinetics in normal human subjects. During somatostatin with insulin alone mean glucose production fell from 1.5 +/- 0.05 to 0.7 +/- 0.2 mg/kg per min and mean plasma glucose declined from 93 +/- 3 to 67 +/- 4 mg/dl over 1 h; glucose production then increased to base-line rates and plasma glucose plateaued at 64-67 mg/dl over 2 h. This plateau was associated with, and is best attributed to, an eightfold increase in mean plasma epinephrine. It did not occur when adrenergic blockade was added; glucose production remained low and mean plasma glucose declined progressively to a hypoglycemic level of 45 +/- 4 mg/dl, significantly (P less than 0.001) lower than the final value during somatostatin with insulin alone. These data provide further support for the concept that maintenance of the postabsorptive plasma glucose concentration is a function of insulin and glucagon, not of insulin alone, and that adrenergic mechanisms do not normally play a critical role. They indicate, however, that an endogenous adrenergic agonist, likely adrenomedullary epinephrine, compensates for deficient glucagon secretion and prevents hypoglycemia in the postabsorptive state in humans. Thus, postabsorptive hypoglycemia occurs when both glucagon and epinephrine are deficient, but not when either glucagon or epinephrine alone is deficient, and insulin is present.     

Insulin resistance in Graves'' disease: a quantitative in-vivo evaluation

Hyperthyroidism is considered to be an insulin-resistant state, but a quantitative evaluation of some action of insulin is still lacking. We performed euglycaemic clamp at about 350 and 7000 pmol l-1 plasma insulin concentration in combination with the 3H-glucose infusion in 12 patients with Graves' disease and in 12 matched controls. Fasting plasma insulin (126 +/- 6.5 vs. 77.5 +/- 5.7 pmol l-1; P less than 0.001), C-peptide (502 +/- 36 vs. 363 +/- 41 pmol l-1; P less than 0.001) and glucagon (47 +/- 3.3 vs. 33.3 +/- 3 pmol l-1; P less than 0.01) were significantly higher in hyperthyroids than in euthyroids. Basal hepatic glucose production was significantly higher in hyperthyroids than in euthyroids (18.3 +/- 1.4 vs. 9.2 +/- 0.5 mumol l-1; P less than 0.0001), and its suppression during physiological hyperinsulinaemia was only 50% in hyperthyroids. Glucose utilization and suppression of lipolysis were normally stimulated by insulin. All parameters altered during hyperthyroidism were normalized during methimazole-induced euthyroidism. We conclude that insulin resistance involves mainly glucose rather than lipid and is selective at the hepatic level.     

Late effect of tobanum and tobanum + furosemide therapy on the glucose tolerance of patients and on the insulin response to oral glucose doses

The authors examined the effect of beta-blocker monotherapy (Tobanum tab = 5 mg cloranololum hydrochloricum) and beta-blocker + diuretic (Tobanum + Furosemide) combination therapy on glucose tolerance and insulin secretion in response to oral glucose doses in hypertensive non-diabetic patients. Twenty-six patients were examined (13 men, 13 women). The patients were followed up for 28 weeks after a 2-week drug-free period. The hypotensive dose was adjusted individually within 4 weeks. Oral glucose tolerance test and immuno-reactive insulin determination were performed concurrently before starting hypotensive therapy and on weeks 6, 14, and 28 of therapy. The results of the examinations were evaluated separately in two patient groups. Fifteen patients were given daily 10-20 mg Tobanum (Group I) while 11 patients received daily 10-20 mg Tobanum + 40-80 mg Furosemide (Group II). The glucose area of patients on Tobanum monotherapy did not change, insulin secretion decreased gradually (from 804 to 495 pmol/l). The decrease was significant (p less than 0.05). The glucose area of Tobanum + Furosemide-treated patients increased from 13.2 +/- 3.2 mmol/l to 16.1 + 4.9, the insulin secretion decreased from 1039 + 339 to 706 + 411 pmol/l during therapy (p less than 0.02 and p less than 0.05, resp.). When evaluating the results the decrease of insulin secretion is attributed to Tobanum effect while the deterioration of glucose tolerance may be correlated to the action of Furosemide on extrapancreatic metabolism.     

Inhibitory effect of circulating insulin on glucagon secretion during hypoglycemia in type I diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVE--To clarify whether the circulating insulin level influences hormonal responses, glucagon secretion in particular, during hypoglycemia in patients with insulin-dependent (type I) diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS--Nine type I diabetic patients were studied. During two separate experiments, hypoglycemia was induced by low-dose (244 pmol.kg-1.h-1) and high-dose (1034 pmol.kg-1.h-1) intravenous insulin infusions for 180 min in each case. The arterial blood glucose level was directly monitored every 1.5 min, and glucose was infused in the high-dose test to clamp the arterial blood glucose level to be identical as in the low-dose test. RESULTS--Despite the fact that the plasma insulin level was four times higher in the high-dose than in the low-dose test (740 +/- 50 vs. 180 +/- 14 pM), a close to identical arterial hypoglycemia of approximately 3.3 mM was obtained in the two experiments. During hypoglycemia, a significant rise of the plasma glucagon level was found only in the low-dose test (188 +/- 29 vs. 237 +/- 37 ng/L, P less than 0.05), and the incremental area under the glucagon curve was significantly greater in the low-dose than in the high-dose test (140 +/- 19 vs. -22.7 +/- 34 ng/L.h-1, P less than 0.005). The responses of plasma epinephrine, norepinephrine, growth hormone, pancreatic polypeptide, and somatostatin were similar in both tests and, consequently, were not significantly modified by the circulating insulin level. CONCLUSIONS--This study demonstrates that, in type I diabetic patients, the glucagon response to hypoglycemia is suppressed by a high level of circulating insulin within the physiological range. Our findings may help to explain the impairment of glucagon secretion during hypoglycemia frequently seen in these patients.     

Effect of acarbose on insulin sensitivity in elderly patients with diabetes

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of acarbose, an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, on insulin release and insulin sensitivity in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Elderly patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly treated in a double-blind fashion with placebo (n = 23) or acarbose (n = 22) for 12 months. Before and after randomization, subjects underwent a meal tolerance test and a hyperglycemic glucose clamp study designed to measure insulin release and sensitivity. RESULTS: After 12 months of therapy there was a significant difference in the change in fasting plasma glucose levels (0.2 +/- 0.3 vs. -0.5 +/- 0.2 mmol/l, placebo vs. acarbose group, respectively; P < 0.05) and in incremental postprandial glucose values (-0.4 +/- 0.6 vs. -3.5 +/- 0.6 mmol/l, placebo vs. acarbose group, P < 0.001) between groups. There was a significant difference in the change in HbA(1c) values in response to treatment (0.4 +/- 0.2 vs. -0.4 +/- 0.1%, placebo vs. acarbose group, P < 0.01). The change in fasting insulin in response to treatment (-2 +/- 2 vs. -13 +/- 4 pmol/l, placebo vs. acarbose group, P < 0.05) and incremental postprandial insulin responses (-89 +/- 26 vs. -271 +/- 59 pmol/l, placebo vs. acarbose group, P < 0.01) was also significantly different between groups. During the hyperglycemic clamps, glucose and insulin values were similar in both groups before and after therapy However, there was a significant difference in the change in insulin sensitivity in response to treatment between the placebo and the acarbose groups (0.001 +/- 0.001 vs. 0.004 +/- 0.001 mg/kg x min(-1) [pmol/l](-1), respectively, P < 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: Acarbose increases insulin sensitivity but not insulin release in elderly patients with diabetes.     

Studies of glucose intolerance in cirrhosis of the liver

Patients with hepatic cirrhosis often have demonstrable glucose intolerance. We studied 21 patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT), intravenous arginine stimulation tests (IVAST), and intravenous insulin tolerance tests (IVITT) were performed, and timed blood samples were obtained for the assay of glucose immunoreactive insulin (IRI), C-peptide (C-P), and immunoreactive glucagon (IRG). The 125I-insulin binding to circulating monocytes was studied in some of the patients. All results were compared to those of similar studies performed on healthy controls. During OGTT significant glucose intolerance was demonstrable in the patients with cirrhosis (2 hr plasma glucose 198.8 +/- 14.3 mg/dl in cirrhosis and 116.4 +/- 4.2 in controls; p less than 0.001). Two-hour plasma IRI, C-P, and IRG were significantly higher in the cirrhotic patients than in controls (p less than 0.001; less than 0.001; less than 0.025). In response to IVAST, the patients with cirrhosis showed a greater first-phase insulin secretion and controls had a slightly better second-phase insulin release. Plasma IRG rose from a basal value of 446 pg/ml to 1100 in the patients with cirrhosis and from 171 pg/ml to 494 in controls. After intravenous insulin administration, there was only a 40% decline in plasma glucose concentration from basal values in the patients with cirrhosis whereas the controls showed a 60% decline, demonstrating that the patients with cirrhosis had significant insulin resistance. Moreover, the half-life of insulin was prolonged in the patients with cirrhosis (t 1/2 = 15.5 min in cirrhosis and 10.3 in controls; p less than 0.001); and the ratio of C-P to insulin during OGTT was also reduced, indicating that the patients with cirrhosis have reduced hepatic clearance of insulin. The specific binding of 125I-insulin to circulating monocytes was 2.7% in cirrhosis, 2% in obese controls, and 4% in lean controls. There was a significant negative correlation between the fasting plasma insulin values and the specific binding of insulin. In conclusion, patients with hepatic cirrhosis have significant glucose intolerance characterized by hyperinsulinemia, hyperglucagonemia, insulin resistance, and down-regulation of insulin receptors. Although hyperinsulinemia is probably caused by reduced hepatic clearance of insulin, hyperglucagonemia is primarily due to increased pancreatic secretion.     

Defects in insulin secretion and insulin action in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus are inherited. Metabolic studies on offspring of diabetic probands.

No studies are available that have compared early defects in glucose metabolism in the offspring of insulin-deficient and insulin-resistant probands with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). To investigate this issue, we evaluated insulin secretion capacity with oral and intravenous glucose tolerance tests and with the hyperglycemic clamp, and insulin action with the euglycemic insulin clamp in 20 offspring of NIDDM patients with low fasting C-peptide (+/-450 pmol/liter), reflecting deficient insulin secretion (IS-group), 18 offspring of NIDDM patients with high fasting C-peptide (>/= 880 pmol/liter), reflecting insulin resistance (IR-group), and 14 healthy control subjects without a family history of NIDDM. The frequency of impaired glucose tolerance was 45.0% in the IS-group and 50% in the IR-group. The IS-group had lower insulin-glucose response at 30 min in the oral glucose tolerance test (85.2+/-10.0 pmol insulin per mmol glucose) than the control group (136.4+/-23.1 pmol insulin per mmol glucose; P < 0.05) and the IR-group (115.6+/-11.8 pmol insulin per mmol glucose; P = 0.05). Furthermore, the acute insulin response during the first 10 min of an intravenous glucose tolerance test was lower in the IS-group than in the IR-group. Maximal insulin secretion capacity evaluated by C-peptide levels during the hyperglycemic clamp did not differ between the groups. The IR-group had lower rates of whole body glucose uptake (60.1+/-4.6 micromol per lean body mass per minute) than did the control group (84.2+/-5.0 micromol per lean body mass per minute; P < 0.001) or the IS-group (82.6+/-5.9 micromol per lean body mass per minute; P < 0.01) and this was due to reduced glucose nonoxidation. To conclude, both impaired insulin secretion and insulin action seem to be inherited and could represent the primary defects in glucose metabolism in the offspring of NIDDM probands.     

Insulin sensitivity in alcoholic cirrhosis

The amount-of-substance rate of glucose metabolism and its sensitivity to the concentration of insulin was quantified in 10 non-diabetic patients with alcoholic cirrhosis of varying severity, using the 'glucose clamp technique'. Fasting glucose and insulin were 5.4 +/- 0.3 mmol/l and 187 +/- 50 pmol/l (mean +/- SEM), respectively. During the hyperglycaemic clamp (blood glucose at 12.5 mmol/l) the glucose metabolic rate (divided by body mass) was 27 +/- 4 mumol X min-1 X kg-1 at an insulin concentration of 998 +/- 158 pmol/l. Thus the insulin sensitivity of the tissue glucose metabolism was 22 +/- 7 m3 X min-1 X kg-1. During the euglycaemic clamp exogenous insulin was given to a concentration of 574 +/- 72 pmol/l. The resulting glucose metabolic rate was 20 +/- 4 mumol X min-1 X kg-1 and the insulin sensitivity the same as during hyperglycaemia. The calculated systemic delivery rate of insulin (divided by body surface area) was 783 +/- 172 pmol X min-1 X m-2. Fasting glucagon was 32 +/- 5 pmol/ and only partly depressed by glucose or insulin. In comparison with stated relevant control groups cirrhotics exhibit glucose intolerance characterized by decreased sensitivity to insulin, hyperinsulinaemia due to increased release, and hyperglucagonaemia with decreased suppressibility. There was no relation between clinical or biochemical data of the patients and the above results, suggesting that the abnormal glucose metabolism does not depend directly on the decreased liver function but on a disturbed pancreatic-hepatic-peripheral axis.     

Youth type 2 diabetes: insulin resistance, beta-cell failure, or both?

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates insulin sensitivity, pancreatic beta-cell function (BCF), and the balance between the two in youth with type 2 diabetes and assesses the relationship of diabetes duration and HbA(1c) to insulin sensitivity and BCF. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The subjects were 14 adolescents with type 2 diabetes and 20 obese control subjects of comparable age, BMI, body composition, and puberty. Insulin sensitivity was evaluated with a 3-h hyperinsulinemic (80 mU . m(-2) . min(-1)) euglycemic clamp. First-phase insulin secretion (FPIS) and second-phase insulin secretion (SPIS) were evaluated with a 2-h hyperglycemic (12.5 mmol/l) clamp. Fasting glucose rate of appearance was determined with the use of [6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose. RESULTS: Fasting glucose rate of appearance was higher in type 2 diabetic patients than in obese control subjects (16.5 +/- 1.1 vs. 12.3 +/- 0.5 micromol . kg(-1) . min(-1); P = 0.002). Insulin sensitivity was lower in type 2 diabetic patients than in obese control subjects (1.0 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.2 micromol . kg(-1) . min(-1) per pmol/l; P = 0.001). Fasting insulin was higher in type 2 diabetic patients than in obese control subjects (289.8 +/- 24.6 vs. 220.2 +/- 18.0 pmol/l; P = 0.007), and FPIS and SPIS were lower (FPIS: 357.6 +/- 42.0 vs. 1,365.0 +/- 111.0 pmol/l; SPIS: 652.2 +/- 88.8 vs. 1,376.4 +/- 88.8 pmol/l; P < 0.001 for both). The glucose disposition index (GDI = insulin sensitivity x FPIS) was approximately 86% lower in type 2 diabetic patients than in obese control subjects. HbA(1c) correlated with FPIS (r = -0.61, P = 0.025) with no relationship to insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the impairment in both insulin sensitivity and BCF in youth with type 2 diabetes, the magnitude of the derangement is greater in BCF than insulin sensitivity when compared with that in obese control subjects. The inverse relationship between BCF and HbA(1c) may either reflect the impact of deteriorating BCF on glycemic control or be a manifestation of a glucotoxic phenomenon on BCF. Future studies in youth type 2 diabetes should target the natural course of beta-cell failure and means of retarding and/or preventing it.     

The effect of insulin-induced hypoglycaemia on gastrointestinal motility in man

The effect of insulin-induced hypoglycaemia on gastro-jejunal motility was studied in five, healthy, male subjects using tethered, pressure sensitive, radiotelemetry capsules. Thirty minutes after the intravenous injection of soluble insulin (0.15 unit/kg body weight), a significant reduction in blood glucose concentration (control: 5.26 +/- 0.19 SEM mmol/l; insulin: 1.48 +/- 0.44 mmol/l; P less than 0.001) was associated with a rise in heart rate (mean peak rise 29 +/- 8 beats/min, P less than 0.05), systolic arterial blood pressure (mean peak rise 28 +/- 4 mmHg, P less than 0.01) and plasma pancreatic polypeptide concentration (control: 20 +/- 7 pmol/l; insulin: 287 +/- 66 pmol/l; P less than 0.01). These events coincided with a short period of jejunal motor activity, which was not associated with gastric motor activity nor with raised plasma motilin concentrations. During the control study, there were no changes in blood glucose concentration, heart rate, arterial blood pressure or plasma pancreatic polypeptide concentrations, and there was no jejunal motor activity. The interval between successive gastric migrating motor complexes (MMC) was not significantly different in the insulin and control studies (control: median interval 110 min, range 108-148 min; insulin: median interval 124 min, range 115-125 min), suggesting that the fasting gastrojejunal MMC and jejunal motor activity arose independently. Insulin-induced hypoglycaemia is accompanied by jejunal motor activity, which may underlie the abdominal symptoms associated with hypoglycaemia.     

The role of insulin and glucagon in the regulation of basal glucose production in the postabsorptive dog.

The aim of the present experiments was to determine the role of insulin and glucagon in the regulation of basal glucose production in dogs fasted overnight. A deficiency of either or both pancreatic hormones was achieved by infusin somatostatin (1 mug/kg per min), a potent inhibitor of both insulin and glucagon secretion, alone or in combination with intraportal replacement infusions of either pancreatic hormone. Infusion of somatostatin alone caused the arterial levels of insulin and glucagon to drop rapidly by 72+/-6 and 81+/-8%, respectively. Intraportal infusion of insulin and glucagon at rates of 400 muU/kg per min and 1 ng/kg per min, respectively, resulted in the maintenance of the basal levels of each hormone. Glucose production was measured using tracer (primed constant infusion of [3-3H]glucose) and arteriovenous difference techniques. Isolated glucagon deficiency resulted in a 35+/-5% (P less than 0.05) rapid and sustained decrease in glucose production which was abolished upon restoration of the plasma glucagon level. Isolated insulin deficiency resulted in a 52+/-16% (P less than 0.01) increase in the rate of glucose production which was abolished when the insulin level was restored. Somatostatin had no effect on glucose production when the changes in the pancreatic hormone levels which it normally induces were prevented by simultaneous intraportal infusion of both insulin and glucagon. In conclusion, in the anesthetized dog fasted overnight; (a) basal glucagon is responsible for at least one-third of basal glucose production, (b) basal insulin prevents the increased glucose production which would result from the unrestrained action of glucagon, and (c) somatostatin has no acute effects on glucose turnover other than those it induces through perturbation of pancreatic hormone secretion. This study indicates that the opposing actions of the two pancreatic hormones are important in the regulation of basal glucose production in the postabsorptive state.     

Effect of new oral antidiabetic agent CS-045 on glucose tolerance and insulin secretion in patients with NIDDM.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of CS-045, a newly developed thiazolidine analogue, on glucose tolerance and insulin response to oral glucose load in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Nineteen NIDDM patients (mean +/- SD age 48.9 +/- 9.4 yr) whose previous glycemic control on diet and/or sulfonylurea (SU) therapy was judged stable but unsatisfactory (greater than 7.8 mM) were selected for this study. CS-045 (400 mg/day p.o.) was given alone or together with the previous SU drugs for 12 wk. A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed before and after CS-045 treatment. Results: The following results were found after CS-045 treatment. 1) Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c decreased (n = 19, FPG, 11.0 +/- 2.4 vs. 8.4 +/- 2.7 mM [before vs. after], P less than 0.001; HbA1c, 8.0 +/- 1.1 vs. 7.4 +/- 1.3%, P less than 0.005), and glucose tolerance markedly improved. 2) Fasting insulin (immunoreactive insulin [IRI]) and insulin response during OGTT decreased (n = 19, fasting IRI, 77.4 +/- 49.8 vs. 56.5 +/- 24.6 pM [before vs. after], P less than 0.05; area under the curve of IRI, 540.3 +/- 350.5 vs. 426.4 +/- 216.3 pM.h, P less than 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CS-045 is effective in improving glucose tolerance without stimulation of insulin secretion in NIDDM, suggesting an effect in improving insulin sensitivity.     

Metabolic alterations in middle-aged and elderly obese patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted this study to assess the metabolic alterations in middle-aged and elderly obese patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Healthy control subjects (9 middle-aged, aged 42 +/- 2 years, BMI 33 +/- 1 kg/m2; 10 elderly, aged 71 +/- 1 years, BMI 29 +/- 1 kg/m2) and patients with type 2 diabetes (11 middle-aged, aged 43 +/- 2 years, BMI 34 +/- 2 kg/m2; 23 elderly, aged 73 +/- 1 years; BMI 30 +/- 1 kg/m2) underwent a 3-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), a 2-h hyperglycemic glucose clamp, and a 3-h euglycemic glucose clamp study with tritiated glucose methodology to measure hepatic glucose production and peripheral disposal rates. RESULTS: Middle-aged and elderly control subjects and patients with diabetes were similar in percentage of body fat. Waist-to-hip ratio was greater in elderly patients with diabetes than in elderly control subjects (P < 0.01), but was similar in both middle-aged groups. VO2max was less in control subjects than in both middle-aged and elderly patients with diabetes (P < 0.05). Insulin responses during the OGTT were similar in elderly control subjects and patients with diabetes, but were less in middle-aged patients with diabetes than in control subjects (305 +/- 49 vs. 690 +/- 136 pmol/l, P < 0.01). Patients with type 2 diabetes had absent first-phase insulin responses during the hyperglycemic clamp. Second-phase (80-120 min) insulin values were similar in elderly patients and control subjects, but were reduced in middle-aged patients with diabetes compared with control subjects (285 +/- 35 vs. 894 +/- 143 pmol/l, P < 0.0001). During the euglycemic clamp, basal and steady-state (150-180 min) hepatic glucose output values were less in middle-aged control subjects than in patients with diabetes (basal, 3.03 +/- 0.10 vs. 3.69 +/- 0.09 mg.kg-1 lean body mass.min-1, P < 0.0001; steady-state, 0.72 +/- 0.10 vs. 1.84 +/- 0.20 mg.kg-1 lean body mass.min-1, P < 0.0001). Basal and steady-state hepatic glucose output values were similar in elderly patients and control subjects. Finally, steady-state (150-180 min) glucose disposal rates were higher in control subjects than in patients with diabetes in both the middle-aged (7.51 +/- 0.85 vs. 4.62 +/- 0.24 mg.kg-1 lean body mass.min-1, P < 0.01) and elderly (9.91 +/- 0.61 vs. 6.78 +/- 0.60 mg.kg-1 lean body mass.min-1, P < 0.01) groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that type 2 diabetes in obese middle-aged subjects is characterized by impaired glucose-induced insulin release, altered regulation of hepatic glucose output, and resistance to insulin-mediated glucose disposal. In contrast, the primary defect in elderly obese patients with type 2 diabetes is resistance to insulin-mediated glucose disposal. Our findings may have important therapeutic implications for these patient populations.     

Intact proinsulin and beta-cell function in lean and obese subjects with and without type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetes is a heterogeneous disease in which both beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance are pathogenetic factors. Disproportionate hyperproinsulinemia (elevated proinsulin/insulin) is another abnormality in type 2 diabetes whose mechanism is unknown. Increased demand due to obesity and/or insulin resistance may result in secretion of immature beta-cell granules with a higher content of intact proinsulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We investigated the impact of obesity on beta-cell secretion in normal subjects and in type 2 diabetic patients by measuring intact proinsulin, total proinsulin immunoreactivity (PIM), intact insulin, and C-peptide (by radioimmunoassay) by specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in the fasting state and during a 120-min glucagon (1 mg i.v.) stimulation test. Lean (BMI 23.5 +/- 0.3 kg/m2) (LD) and obese (30.1 +/- 0.4 kg/m2) (OD) type 2 diabetic patients matched for fasting glucose (10.2 +/- 0.6 vs. 10.3 +/- 0.4 mmol/l) were compared with age- and BMI-matched lean (22.4 +/- 0.6 kg/m2) (LC) and obese (30.8 +/- 0.9 kg/m2) (OC) normal control subjects. RESULTS: Diabetic patients (LD vs. LC and OD vs. OC) had elevated fasting levels of intact proinsulin 6.6 +/- 1.0 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.3 pmol/l and 7.7 +/- 2.0 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.2 pmol/l; PIM: 19.9 +/- 2.5 vs. 5.4 +/- 1.0 pmol/l and 29.6 +/- 6.1 vs. 6.1 +/- 0.9 pmol/l; and total PIM/intact insulin: 39 +/- 4 vs. 15 +/- 2% and 35 +/- 5 vs. 13 +/- 2%, all P < 0.01. After glucagon stimulation, PIM levels were disproportionately elevated (PIM/intact insulin based on area under the curve analysis) in diabetic patients (LD vs. LC and OD vs. OC): 32.6 +/- 6.7 vs. 9.2 +/- 1.1% and 22.7 +/- 5.2 vs. 9.1 +/- 1.1%, both P < 0.05. Intact insulin and C-peptide net responses were significantly reduced in type 2 diabetic patients, most pronounced in the lean group. The ratio of intact proinsulin to PIM was higher in diabetic patients after stimulation in both LD versus LC: 32 +/- 3 vs. 23 +/- 2%, and OD versus OC: 28 +/- 4 vs. 16 +/- 2%, both P < 0.01. In obese normal subjects, intact proinsulin/PIM was lower both in the fasting state and after glucagon stimulation: OC versus LC: 22 +/- 3 vs. 33 +/- 3% (fasting) and 16 +/- 2 vs. 23 +/- 2% (stimulated), both P < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Increased secretory demand from obesity-associated insulin resistance cannot explain elevated intact proinsulin and disproportionate hyperproinsulinemia in type 2 diabetes. This abnormality may be an integrated part of pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction in this disease.