Whole-body 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for accurate staging of Hodgkin's disease

Background: Staging of Hodgkin's disease (HD) is accomplished by a variety of invasive and non-invasive modalities. This prospective study was undertaken to investigate the value of whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) in defining regions involved by lymphoma compared with conventional staging methods in patients with HD.Patients and methods: Fourty-four newly diagnosed patients with HD underwent FDG-PET as part of their initial staging work-up. PET findings were correlated with findings of conventional staging including computed tomography, ultrasound, bone scanning, bone marrow biopsy, liver biopsy and laparotomy. When results of FDG-PET differed to those obtained by conventional methods reevaluation was performed by biopsy, if possible, or magnetic resonance imaging.Results: The results of FDG-PET were compared with three hundred twenty-one conventional staging procedures performed in 44 patients. FDG-PET was positive in 38 of 44 (86%) patients at sites of documented disease. PET detected additional lesions in five cases previously not identified by conventional staging methods. In another case a nodal lesion suspect on CT was negative at FDG-PET and was settled as true negative by biopsy. As a consequence of PET findings five patients had to be upstaged and one patient had to be downstaged, resulting in changes in treatment strategy in all six cases (14%). FDG-PET failed to visualize sites of HD in four patients. In two of our patients a false positive PET result was obtained.Conclusions: Our data indicate that FDG-PET provides an imaging technique that appears to visualize involved lesions in most patients with HD and is useful in the managment of these patients.     

Is CT scan still necessary for staging in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients in the PET/CT era?

BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of fused PET/CT data on staging and patient management of Hodgkin disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 103 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed NHL (n = 68) and HD (n = 35) were assessed retrospectively. Three comparisons were carried out in an attempt to assess the added value of each modality. RESULTS: For NHL patients, there were significant differences between staging by CT versus PET/CT (P = 0.0001). Disease was upstaged by PET/CT in 31% (mostly in stages I and II) and downstaged in only 1% of patients. In 25% of the patients, the treatment approach was changed according to CT versus PET/CT findings. For HD patients, disease was upstaged by PET/CT in 32% and downstaged by PET/CT in 15% (P = NS). As for NHL, upstaging by PET/CT versus CT was evident mostly for stages I and II. The treatment strategy was altered as determined by CT versus PET/CT in 45% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of PET/CT to CT changed the management decisions in approximately a quarter of NHL and a third of HD patients, mostly in early disease stages. Thus, PET/CT performed as the initial staging procedure may well obviate the need for additional diagnostic CT in the majority of patients.     

Stage Migration in Planning PET/CT Scans in Patients Due to Receive Radiotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionThis study examined rates of tumor progression in treatment-naive patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as determined by repeat treatment-planning fluorine-18 (¹⁸F) fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT).Methods and MaterialsThis study assessed patients who underwent PET/CT simulation for NSCLC stage II/III, radiation-naive, nonmetastatic NSCLC. It compared planning PET/CT with previous PET/CT images. Patients were analyzed for change in stage, treatment intent, or both. Progression was defined as a change in TNM status leading to upstaging, and standardized uptake value (SUV) velocity was defined as [(SUV_scan2 − SUV_scan1)/interscan interval in days].ResultsOf 149 consecutive patients examined between April 2009 and April 2011, 47 had prior PET/CT scans and were included. The median age was 68 years. New nodal disease or metastatic disease was identified in 24 (51%) of 47 patients. Fourteen (30%) had evidence of extrathoracic metastatic disease; the remaining 10 (21%) had new nodal disease that required substantial alteration of treatment fields. At a scan interval of 20 days, the rate of upstaging was 17%. SUV velocity was analyzed in the subset of patients who had their studies on the identical PET/CT scanner (n = 14). Nonupstaged patients had a mean SUV velocity of 0.074 units per day, compared with 0.11 units per day in patients that were upstaged by their second PET/CT scan (P = .020).ConclusionRadiation treatment planning with hybrid PET/CT scans repeated within 120 days of an initial staging PET/CT scan identified significant upstaging in more than half of patients. For a subset of patients who underwent both scans on the same instrument, SUV velocity predicts upstaging, and the difference between those upstaged and those not was statistically significant.     

Coregistered whole body magnetic resonance imaging‐positron emission tomography (MRI‐PET) versus PET‐computed tomography plus brain MRI in staging resectable lung cancer

BACKGROUND:

The objective of this study was to assess whether coregistered whole brain (WB) magnetic resonance imaging‐positron emission tomography (MRI‐PET) would increase the number of correctly upstaged patients compared with WB PET‐computed tomography (PET‐CT) plus dedicated brain MRI in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS:

From January 2010 through November 2011, patients with NSCLC who had resectable disease based on conventional staging were assigned randomly either to coregistered MRI‐PET or WB PET‐CT plus brain MRI (ClinicalTrials.gov trial NCT01065415). The primary endpoint was correct upstaging (the identification of lesions with higher tumor, lymph node, or metastasis classification, verified with biopsy or other diagnostic test) to have the advantage of avoiding unnecessary thoracotomy, to determine appropriate treatment, and to accurately predict patient prognosis. The secondary endpoints were over staging and under staging compared with pathologic staging.

RESULTS:

Lung cancer was correctly upstaged in 37 of 143 patients (25.9%) in the MRI‐PET group and in 26 of 120 patients (21.7%) in the PET‐CT plus brain MRI group (4.2% difference; 95% confidence interval, ?6.1% to 14.5%; P = .426). Lung cancer was over staged in 26 of 143 patients (18.2%) in the MRI‐PET group and in 7 of 120 patients (5.8%) in the PET‐CT plus brain MRI group (12.4% difference; 95% confidence interval, 4.8%‐20%; P = .003), whereas lung cancer was under staged in 18 of 143 patients (12.6%) and in 28 of 120 patients (23.3%), respectively (?10.7% difference; 95% confidence interval, ?20.1% to ?1.4%; P = .022).

CONCLUSIONS:

Although both staging tools allowed greater than 20% correct upstaging compared with conventional staging methods, coregistered MRI‐PET did not appear to help identify significantly more correctly upstaged patients than PET‐CT plus brain MRI in patients with NSCLC. Cancer 2013. © 2013 American Cancer Society.     

Impact of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging and treatment response assessment of extra-pulmonary small-cell cancer

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in extrapulmonary small-cell cancer (EPSCC). Patients with EPSCC who underwent PET for staging or response assessment between 1996 and 2007 were identified from a database. Patient records were reviewed. PET-based, and conventional staging and restaging results were compared. The binary staging classification of limited disease (LD) versus extensive disease (ED) was used. Patients with LD had tumours that could be encompassed within a tolerable radiation therapy (RT) volume. Of 33 eligible patients, 12 had staging PET scans, 11 had restaging scans and 10 had both. All known gross disease sites were FDG-avid. PET and conventional stage groupings were concordant in 21 of 22 cases. One patient was appropriately upstaged from LD to ED by PET. PET detected additional disease sites, without causing upstaging in three further patients. Restaging PET scans identified previously unrecognised persistent or progressive disease in 4 of 21 cases. In four further cases, persistent FDG uptake after treatment was either false positive (n = 2) or of uncertain (n = 2) aetiology. PPV was 100% for staging and 82% for restaging. In 8 of 43 imaging episodes (19%), PET appropriately influenced management in five cases by changing treatment intent from radical to palliative, and in three cases by altering the RT volume. PET has incremental value compared to conventional imaging for staging EPSCC, and may also be useful for restaging after therapy. PET influenced patient management in 19% of 43 imaging episodes.     

2-Fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D glucose positron emission tomography in the pretreatment staging of Hodgkin's disease: Influence on patient management in a single institution

Purpose:Optimum therapy for patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD)is determined by a number of prognostic factors, one of which is an accuratedefinition of extent of disease (stage). Computerised tomography is widelyused in staging but cannot reliably evaluate normal sized lymph nodes and someextranodal sites, e.g., liver, spleen and bone marrow.2-Fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D glucose (FDG) has been shown to concentratepreferentially in lymphoma sites (whether in nodal or extranodal tissue) andtherefore may have a useful role in staging patients with HD. This studycompares concurrent computerized tomography (CT) and FDG positron emissiontomography (PET) in the staging of Hodgkin's disease and assesses thefrequency of stage migration and possible changes in therapy related to theuse of PET scanning. Patients and methods:This was a single centre retrospective studyof 44 patients with Hodgkin's disease who underwent both staging CT and PETprior to treatment between September 1993 and August 1998 at St. Thomas'Hospital. The number and sites of disease were assessed for each patient,documenting any stage and therapy modification prompted by PET findings. Results:One hundred fifty-nine sites of disease were demonstratedin forty-four patients by FDG–PET compared with eighty-four by CT. Asa result, 18 (40.9%) patients were upstaged, nine of these byFDG-uptake in splenic or extranodal sites not visualised on CT. Only threepatients were downstaged by PET results. Eleven patients (25%) hadtreatment modified by PET scan findings. Conclusions:Significantly more sites of disease were identifiedby PET than CT resulting in stage changes and a modification of therapy in25% of patients. This has important implications not only for currentpatient management but also for the design of future clinical trials.     

Impact of [18f] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on staging and management of early-stage follicular non-hodgkin lymphoma

PURPOSE: Accurate staging is critical to select patients with early-stage (I-II) follicular lymphoma (ESFL) suitable for involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) and to define the radiotherapy portal. We evaluated the impact of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET on staging, treatment, and outcome for patients with ESFL on conventional staging. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-two patients with untreated ESFL (World Health Organization Grade I-IIIa, or "low grade") following a minimum of physical examination, computerized tomography, and bone marrow examination (conventional assessment) and who had staging PET from June 1997 to June 2006 were studied retrospectively. Stage allocation was based on routine imaging reports. Disease sites, stage, and management plan were recorded based on conventional assessment or conventional assessment plus PET. RESULTS: FDG avidity was demonstrated in 97% of patients in whom disease was evident on conventional assessment after biopsy. PET findings suggested a change of stage or management in 19 patients: 13 (31%) who were upstaged to Stage III-IV, altering ideal management from IFRT to systemic therapy, and 6 (14%) who had the involved field enlarged, including 4 upstaged from Stage I to II. Of these 19 cases, PET findings were considered true positive in 8 patients, indeterminate in 10, and false positive in only 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that ESFL is usually FDG-avid. In routine practice, PET has the potential to upstage and thereby alter management in a high proportion of patients with apparent ESFL.     

Pre-chemotherapy 18F-FDG PET/CT upstages nodal stage in stage II–III breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

In breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) the number of tumor-positive nodes can no longer reliably be determined. Furthermore, ultrasound (US) seems suboptimal for the detection of N3-disease. Therefore we assessed the proportion of breast cancer patients treated with NAC in which pre-chemotherapy 18F-FDG PET/CT detected ≥4 axillary nodes or occult N3-disease, upstaging nodal status and changing risk estimation for locoregional recurrence (LRR). Conventional regional staging consisted of US with fine needle aspiration and/or sentinel lymph node biopsy. Patients were classified as low-risk (cT2N0), intermediate-risk (cT0N1, cT1N1, cT2N1, cT3N0), or high-risk (cT3N1, cT4, cN2–3) for LRR. The presence and number of FDG-avid nodes were evaluated and the proportion of patients that would be upstaged by PET/CT, based on detection of ≥4 FDG-avid axillary nodes defined as cN2(4+) or occult N3-disease, was calculated. In total, 87 of 278 patients were considered high-risk based on conventional staging. PET/CT detected occult N3-disease in 5 (11 %) of 47 low-risk patients. In 144 intermediate-risk patients, PET/CT detected ≥4 FDG-avid nodes in 24 (17 %) patients and occult N3-disease in 22 (15 %) patients, thereby finally upstaging 38 (26 %) of intermediate-risk patients. Of 43 (23 %) upstaged patients, 18 were ypN0, 12 were ypN1, and 13 were ypN2–3. Pre-chemotherapy PET/CT is valuable for selection of breast cancer patients at high risk for LRR. In our population, 23 % of patients treated with NAC were upstaged to the high-risk group based on PET/CT information, potentially benefiting from regional radiotherapy.     

Randomized controlled trial of the role of positron emission tomography in the management of stage I and II non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Positron emission tomography (PET) is a costly new technology with potential to improve preoperative evaluation for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There is increasing pressure for PET to be included in standard diagnostic work-up before decisions about surgical management of NSCLC. The resource implications of its widespread use in staging NSCLC are significant. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted to investigate the impact of PET on clinical management and surgical outcomes for patients with stage I-II NSCLC. The primary hypothesis was that PET would reduce the proportion of patients with stage I-II NSCLC who underwent thoracotomy by at least 10% through identification of patients with inoperable disease. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-four patients with stage I-II NSCLC were recruited and randomly assigned; 92% had stage I disease. Following exclusion of one ineligible patient, 92 patients were assigned to no PET and 91 to PET. Compared with conventional staging, PET upstaged 22 patients, confirmed staging in 61 and staged two patients as benign. Stage IV disease was rarely detected (two patients). PET led to further investigation or a change in clinical management in 13% of patients and provided information that could have affected management in a further 13% of patients. There was no significant difference between the trial arms in the number of thoracotomies avoided (P =.2). CONCLUSION: For patients who are carefully and appropriately staged as having stage I-II disease, PET provides potential for more appropriate stage-specific therapy but may not lead to a significant reduction in the number of thoracotomies avoided.     

18F-FDG PET显像在非小细胞肺癌临床分期中的价值

目的 探讨^18F-脱氧葡萄糖-正电子发射体层显像(^18F-FDG PET)在非小细胞肺癌(NscLC)临床分期中的价值。方法 105例NSCLC患者于放射治疗前行^18F-FDG PET检查,进行PET分期,并将PET分期和CT分期结果进行比较分析。结果 ^18F-FDG PET扫描使38例NSCLC患者分期改变,其中分期升级31例,分期降级7例。21例分期升级者PET检查发现了远处转移灶,其治疗方案由根治性治疗改为姑息性治疗;6例分期降级者进行了根治性手术治疗,其中5例PET分期与病理分期一致。PET发现远处转移灶的几率随PET扫描前分期的升级而上升,其中Ⅰ期10．0％(2／20),Ⅱ期14．3％(3／21),Ⅲ期25．0％(16／64)。结论 ^18F-FDG PET显像改变了36．2％(38／105)NSCLC患者的临床分期,影响了其治疗策略。^18F-FDG PET显像对NSCLC患者的临床分期有重要的参考价值。     

The value of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the selection of patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer for combined modality treatment

Combined modality treatment (CMT) for patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is at present studied extensively. To select patients with truly stage IIIA-N2 disease, however, proves to be difficult with current diagnostic tests. Distant metastases may become clinically overt during induction chemotherapy (IC) or shortly after, revealing the inaccuracies of current staging algorithms. A prospective study with [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients was performed to assess its value in the selection of this patient group. Fifty-seven patients received a whole body FDG PET scan as part of an ongoing response monitoring trial. Results were compared with conventional staging. In 32/57 (56%) PET suggested upstaging, which was confirmed in 17/57 (30%) with a median follow-up of 16 (range 2-49) months. These results show that using the conventional staging algorithm a substantial group of patients was understaged. FDG PET improves the selection of patients suitable for CMT.     

Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: A prospective study of preoperative tumor-node-metastasis staging of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) was designed to compare the accuracy of 18-F-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) with conventional noninvasive modalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-four patients with carcinomas of the esophagus (n = 43) or gastroesophageal junction (n = 31) were studied. All patients underwent attenuation-corrected FDG-PET imaging, a spiral computed tomography (CT) scan, and an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). RESULTS: FDG-PET demonstrated increased activity in the primary tumor in 70 of 74 patients (sensitivity: 95%). False-negative PET images were found in four patients with T1 lesions. Thirty-four patients (46%) had stage IV disease. FDG-PET had a higher accuracy for diagnosing stage IV disease compared with the combination of CT and EUS (82% v 64%, respectively; P: =.004). FDG-PET had additional diagnostic value in 16 (22%) of 74 patients by upstaging 11 (15%) and downstaging five (7%) patients. Thirty-nine (53%) of the 74 patients underwent a 2- or 3-field lymphadenectomy in conjunction with primary curative esophagectomy. In these patients, tumoral involvement was found in 21 local and 35 regional or distant lymph nodes (LN). For local LN, the sensitivity of FDG-PET was lower than EUS (33% v 81%, respectively; P: =.027), but the specificity may have been higher (89% v 67%, respectively; P: = not significant [NS]). For the assessment of regional and distant LN involvement, compared with the combined use of CT and EUS, FDG-PET had a higher specificity (90% v 98%, respectively; P: =. 025) and a similar sensitivity (46% v 43%, respectively; P: = NS). CONCLUSION: PET significantly improves the detection of stage IV disease in EC compared with the conventional staging modalities. PET improves diagnostic specificity for LN staging.     

Whole body positron emission tomography in the treatment of Hodgkin disease

BACKGROUND: In Hodgkin disease (HD), accurate assessment of the extent of disease is essential because it provides the basis for different treatment strategies. In addition to conventional imaging methods (CIM), positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) may permit reliable differentiation between lymphoma and nonmalignant tissue and thus improve determination of the stage of the disease. The aim of the current study was to assess the clinical value of FDG-PET for primary staging, treatment monitoring, and assessment in a suspected case of recurrent HD. METHODS: Eighty-one patients with HD underwent 106 FDG-PET studies using a dedicated whole body PET ring scanner. In 25 patients PET was part of the primary staging, 63 PET studies were undertaken for treatment monitoring after the completion of treatment, and in 18 patients PET was performed in cases of suspected recurrence of HD. PET scans were compared with CIM and verified histologically and/or by follow-up evaluation (mean follow-up duration, 20.4 months). RESULTS: With regard to primary staging, in a patient to patient analysis, both PET scans and CIM were positive (i.e., showed pathologic foci indicative of HD) in 24 of 25 cases. In a staging-relevant lesion to lesion analysis, accuracy in the determination of the stage of disease was 96% for PET versus 56% for CIM. PET led to a lower stage classification in 28% and a higher stage classification in 12% of cases, compared with the stage assumed with CIM. With regard to treatment monitoring, PET showed an accuracy of 91% compared with 62% for CIM. The negative predictive value of PET was 96%. With regard to suspected recurrence, PET findings were true-positive in 10 of 12 PET scans and true-negative in 5 of 6 PET scans, resulting in accuracy of 83%, which compares favorably with the accuracy rate of 56% for CIM. CONCLUSIONS: It may be concluded that FDG-PET is capable of determining the stage of HD with great accuracy and is capable of correctly detecting manifestations of HD in treatment monitoring and cases of suspected recurrence, in which CIM occasionally result in equivocal findings. The results of the current study suggest that FDG-PET should become a routine tool in the staging/restaging of HD.     

Impact of positron emission tomography on the management of patients with small-cell lung cancer: preliminary experience

Accurate staging is important in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients with limited stage may benefit from chemoradiation, whereas those with extensive stage conventionally receive chemotherapy. Prophylactic cranial irradiation may benefit those attaining complete remission (CR). 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) enhances accuracy of staging in non-SCLC. Its role in SCLC remains unclear. We reviewed 36 consecutive SCLC patients who underwent 47 PET studies between December 1996 and January 2001, for either staging (n = 11), restaging after therapy (n = 21), or both (n = 4). Conventional imaging was also performed. Of 15 patients who had PET for staging, 5 (33%) were upstaged from limited to extensive disease and treated without thoracic radiotherapy. Twenty-five patients underwent 32 restaging PET scans, of which 20 (63%) were discordant with conventional imaging. In 8 cases PET showed more extensive disease than conventional imaging, and in 12 cases PET-apparent disease appeared less extensive. In 13 patients, 14 untreated discordant lesions were evaluable; PET was confirmed accurate in 11 (79%) sites by last follow-up. Restaging PET influenced management in 13 cases (52%). PET-CR conferred longer median time to progression (13.7 months) than no CR (9.7 months). FDG-PET for SCLC was often discordant with conventional assessment and frequently influenced management.     

Value of ^18F-FDG PET in Clinical Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of ^18F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (^18F-FDG PET) in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). METHODS 105 patients with NSCLC had been examined by ^18F-FDG PET before radiotherapy. The results of the ^18F-FDG PET examination were compared with those of CT.RESULTS The staging was changed in 38 patients because of ^18F-FDG PET findings, with PET resulting in upstaging in 31 patients and downstaging in seven patients. Because of distant metastasis detected by PET, 21 patients received palliative treatment. Six of the seven downstaged patients underwent radical surgery, among which the PET findings were concordant with the pathological findings in five patients. Distant metastasis detected by PET elevated the pre-PET stage: at stage 110.0% (2/20), stage Ⅱ 14.3% (3/21) and stage Ⅲ 25.0% (16/64), respectively.CONCLUSION ^18F-FDG PET, by changing clinical staging in 36.2% (38/105) of NSCLC patients, has an impact on treatment strategy in NSCLC patients.     

Value of 18F-FDG PET in Clinical Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of 18F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).METHODS 105 patients with NSCLC had been examined by 18F-FDG PET before radiotherapy. The results of the 18F-FDG PET examination were compared with those of CT:RESULTS The staging was changed in 38 patients because of 18F-FDG PET findings, with PET resulting in upstaging in 31 patients and downstaging in seven patients. Because of distant metastasis detected by PET, 21 patients received palliative treatment. Six of the seven downstaged patients underwent radical surgery, among which the PET findings were concordant with the pathological findings in five patients. Distant metastasis detected by PET elevated the pre-PET stage: at stage 110.0% (2/20), stage Ⅱ 14.3% (3/21 ) and stage Ⅲ 25.0% (16/64), respectively.CONCLUSION 18F-FDG PET, by changing clinical staging in 36.2% (38/105)of NSCLC patients, has an impact on treatment strategy in NSCLC patients.     

The prognostic value of positron emission tomography in non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of 266 cases

Positron emission tomography (PET) is more accurate than computed tomography (CT) in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We analyzed the prognostic value of PET for survival in NSCLC patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients with proven NSCLC with PET for staging were selected. Staging by laboratory tests, bronchoscopy, chest X-ray, and CT was performed in all patients, leading to a clinical stage (c-TNM) prior to PET. A separate classification (pet-TNM) was obtained from PET images by observers blinded to clinical data. We performed univariate survival analysis with ECOG performance score, sex, weight loss, comorbidity, histology, c-TNM, and pet-TNM as variables. Cox regression analysis was performed with significant variables from the univariate analyses. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-six patients were included, 205 men and 61 women. c-TNM and pet-TNM were identical in 150 (56%) patients, 69 were upstaged, and 47 were downstaged by PET. At time of analysis, 198 (74%) patients had died. Univariate analysis showed significant survival differences for ECOG performance score (0 versus 1/2), weight loss (<10% versus >or=10%), pulmonary comorbidity, c-TNM, and pet-TNM (stage IA versus IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IV). Cox regression analysis identified pet-TNM as the most significant (p < 0.001) prognostic factor, followed by ECOG performance score (p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Tumor stage as determined by PET is the most significant prognostic factor for survival in patients with NSCLC.     

Staging performance of carbon-11 choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma: comparison with conventional imaging

The present study was conducted to compare the diagnostic accuracy between carbon-11 choline (11C-choline) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and conventional imaging for the staging of bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Sixteen patients who underwent 11C-choline PET/CT prior to treatment were evaluated retrospectively for staging accuracy. Conventional imaging methods consisted of 99,mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy, chest CT and magnetic resonance imaging of the primary site. The images were reviewed and a consensus was reached by two board-certified radiologists who were unaware of any clinical or radiological information using hard-copy films and multimodality computer platform. Tumor stage was confirmed by histological examination and/or by an obvious progression in number and/or size of the lesions on follow-up examinations. Reviewers examining both 11C-choline PET/CT and conventional imaging classified T stage in all patients. Interpretation based on 11C-choline PET/CT, the Node (N) stage was correctly diagnosed in all patients, whereas the accuracy of conventional imaging in N stage was 63%. Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) stage was assessed correctly with 11C-choline PET/CT in 15 of 16 patients (94%) and with conventional imaging in eight of 16 patients (50%). The overall TNM staging and N staging accuracy of 11C-choline PET/CT were significantly higher than that of conventional imaging (P < 0.05). 11C-choline PET/CT is more accurate than conventional imaging regarding clinical staging of patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas. A whole body 11C-choline PET/CT might be acceptable for imaging studies of tumor staging prior to treatment.     

Frequent impact of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on the staging and management of patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is useful in staging aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). However, its role in indolent NHL has not been established. This retrospective study assessed the sensitivity and clinical impact of PET findings in patients with indolent NHL. Patients with indolent NHL who underwent FDG-PET scanning between May 1997 and August 2001 were identified. Case records were reviewed for FDG-PET and conventional staging/restaging results and compared for concordance. Forty-seven patients were identified. Twelve staging FDG-PET scans and 37 restaging FDG-PET scans were obtained. The FDG-PET case sensitivity rate was 98%. Forty-two percent of staging FDG-PET scans were concordant with conventional staging, with the remaining patients exhibiting more extensive disease on PET. At progression, FDG-PET and conventional assessments were discordant in 46% of cases. Positron emission tomography findings downstaged disease in 30% of these patients and upstaged disease in 16%. Computed tomography (CT) and FDG-PET identified 150 and 146 individual sites of disease, respectively. Among "definite" sites on structural imaging, 74% were also seen on PET. For equivocal lesions, only 19% were seen on both modalities. Clinical management was changed in 34% of patients as a result of FDG-PET findings. Of 22 discordant lesions in which true disease status could be evaluated, the PET findings were confirmed to be correct in 21 (95%; P < 0.0001). These findings demonstrate that FDG-PET has a high sensitivity for indolent NHL and often leads to alteration of disease staging and management. This high accuracy of FDG-PET in assessing discordant lesions suggests a greater diagnostic utility compared with CT.     

Value of18F-FDG PET in clinical staging of non-small cell lung cancer

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility of¹⁸F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET) in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

105 patients with NSCLC had been examined by¹⁸F-FDG PET before radiotherapy. The results of the¹⁸F-FDG PET examination were compared with those of CT.

Results

The staging was changed in 38 patients because of¹⁸F-FDG PET findings, with PET resulting in upstaging in 31 patients and downstaging in seven patients. Because of distant metastasis detected by PET, 21 patients received palliative treatment. Six of the seven downstaged patients underwent radical surgery, among which the PET findings were concordant with the pathological findings in five patients. Distant metastasis detected by PET elevated the pre-PET stage: at stage I 10.0% (2/20), stage II 14.3% (3/ 21) and stage III 25.0% (16/64), respectively.

Conclusion

¹⁸F-FDG PET, by changing clinical staging in 36.2% (38/105) of NSCLC patients, has an impact on treatment strategy in NSCLC patients.