A phase II evaluation of ifosfamide and mesna in unresectable diffuse malignant mesothelioma. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

BACKGROUND. Malignant mesothelioma is a highly treatment-resistant neoplasm. This study represents an attempt to define an effective form of systemic therapy. METHODS. Twenty-six patients with unresectable diffuse malignant mesothelioma were enrolled in Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) study 8731 and treated with ifosfamide, 2 g/m2 intravenously for 4 days, and mesna 2 g/m2 intravenously for 5 days, every 3 weeks. Patients were either previously untreated with chemotherapy or had at most one prior systemic treatment. RESULTS. Two patients, or 8% (95% confidence interval, 1-25%), achieved partial response, with response durations of 4 and 6 months. One additional patient met criteria for tumor size reduction but not duration criteria. Thirteen (50%) patients had stable disease of 4 months' median duration (range, 1-13 months). The median survival of the entire group was 6.5 months. The dose-limiting toxicity was granulocytopenia (11 patients, < or = 250/microliters). CONCLUSIONS. Ifosfamide/mesna has modest activity in malignant mesothelioma. It could be tested using alternate dosage schedules and in combination with other agents in treating this highly resistant neoplasm.     

Ifosfamide in malignant mesothelioma: a phase II study.

Malignant mesothelioma is a rare malignancy with a median survival, ranging from 4 to 18 months in untreated patients. In a phase II study of patients with mesothelioma, the efficacy and toxicity of ifosfamide and mesna was evaluated. Twenty-nine previously untreated patients, with histologically proven and unresectable mesothelioma, entered the study. Three patients were later excluded from the study due to revision of the diagnoses. The patients had to have bidimensionally measurable disease by CT scans and a WHO performance status < or = 3. Eligible patients received ifosfamide 3000 mg/m2 per day for 3 days as a 1-h infusion and mesna 1800 mg/m2 per day for 3 days every third week. Dose modifications were made according to the degree of hematologic, neurologic and renal toxicity. Response to treatment was evaluated in accordance with WHO criteria. The median age of patients was 59 years (range 39-68), 18 patients (69%) had a history of asbestos exposure and the median of treatment cycles was four (range 1-10). No complete responses were observed. One patient obtained a partial response after five cycles with a duration of response of 25 months. Nine patients (35%) had stable disease, while 13 (54%) progressed. The median survival for all patients was 10 months. The toxicity of the treatment was considerable. Thirteen patients (50%) had grade 4 leucopenia, ten patients (38%) had grade 3 or 4 reversible neurotoxicity and ten patients (38%) had grade 3 or 4 nausea and vomiting. Eleven patients (42%) went off the study due to the toxicity of the treatment. In conclusion, ifosfamide did not show any substantial activity of relevance in malignant mesothelioma at the dose level investigated, in spite of considerable toxicity.     

Gemcitabine and cisplatin in unresectable malignant mesothelioma of the pleura: a phase II study of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG 9810)

PURPOSE: The purpose of this open-label phase II SWOG study was to evaluate the activity of gemcitabine (Gemzar; Eli Lilly, Indiana, USA) and cisplatin combination therapy, in patients with unresectable malignant mesothelioma of the pleura. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty eligible chemotherapy na?ve patients with histologically proven malignant mesothelioma of the pleura, and a SWOG performance status 0-2 were enrolled between February 1999 and August 2000. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000mg/m(2) and cisplatin 30mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, until progression of disease or two cycles beyond complete response. RESULTS: Using SWOG response criteria, one patient had a confirmed complete response and five patients had a confirmed partial response, for a total response rate of 12% (95% CI 5-24%). All the responses were seen in patients with epithelioid or unspecified histology. Stable disease was seen in 25 patients (50%). The median overall survival was 10 months (95% CI 7-15 months), with a median progression-free survival of 6 months. Sixteen patients experienced Grade 4 toxicity. Twelve of these Grade 4 toxicities were hematologic. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin-gemcitabine combination chemotherapy has modest activity with an acceptable toxicity profile, as first line treatment for patients with malignant mesothelioma.     

Ifosfamide,Cisplatin and Etoposide (ICE)Combined Chemotherapy with Recombinant Human Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Support in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of ifosfamide, cisplatin and etoposide (ICE) combined chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and to test the feasibility of adding recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) to aggressive chemotherapy. Thirty consecutive, previously untreated, patients with SCLC (17 with limited disease and 13 with extensive disease) entered this study. The ICE regimen consisted of ifosfamide (I) 4 g/m² i.v. with same dose mesna i.v. on first day, cisplatin (C) 25 mg/m² i.v. on days 1 to 3 and etoposide (E) 100 mg/m² i.v. on days 1 to 3. A total of 30 MU rhG-CSF i.v. were given from day 7 to 14 if WBC were lower than 3000x10⁶/L, neutrophils were lower than 1000x10⁶/L. Overall response (OR) rate was 93% with a complete response (CR) rate of 23%. Median survival was 12 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 11-14] and median response duration was 10 months [95% CI: 8-10]. Thirty-seven percent of patients had grade 3 neu-tropenia, 40% had grade 3 anemia, and 1% had grade 2 thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild with nausea and vomiting being the most common. RhG-CSF, which reduced leukopenic nadirs and shortened the neutropenic period, was also well tolerated. This chemotherapy protocol seems to be active, well tolerated and is currently being compared with various conventional chemotherapies.     

Carboplatin and pemetrexed in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a realistic treatment option?

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer. Chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed can improve overall survival but has a toxic profile. Substitution of cisplatin with carboplatin may avoid some potential side-effects. Therefore, we undertook a retrospective review to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of carboplatin and pemetrexed in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in clinical practice. METHODS: Patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma who had been treated with carboplatin and pemetrexed were retrospectively identified from pharmacy databases. The endpoints were disease control rate, time to treatment failure, clinical improvement rate and overall survival. We also evaluated any significant haematological and non-haematological toxicities. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were identified. Of 45 evaluable cases, the disease control rate was achieved in 34 patients (69%, 95% CI 55-82, intention to treat analysis). The clinical response rate was achieved in 34 out of 49 patients (69%, 95% CI 55-82). The median time to treatment failure was 4.6 months (95% CI 3.4-5.8) and median overall survival was 14 months (95% CI 9.5-18.5). Grade 3/4 haematological toxicities were observed in 7 patients (14.3%). Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities were seen in 12 patients (24.5%). No toxic deaths were recorded. CONCLUSION: The combination of carboplatin and pemetrexed may be a viable option in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma.     

Phase I Trial of Cediranib in Combination with Cisplatin and Pemetrexed in Chemonaive Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (SWOG S0905)

IntroductionIn malignant pleural mesothelioma, targeting angiogenesis with cediranib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibitor, may have therapeutic potential.MethodsS0905 phase I combined cediranib (two dose cohorts [30 mg and 20 mg daily]) with cisplatin-pemetrexed for six cycles followed by maintenance cediranib in unresectable chemonaive patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma of any histologic subtype. The primary end point established the maximum tolerated dose in combination with cisplatin-pemetrexed in a dose deescalation scheme.ResultsA total of 20 patients were enrolled (seven to the 30-mg cohort and 13 to the 20-mag cohort). In the cediranib 30-mg cohort, two of the initial six patients reported dose-limiting toxicities and the dose was deemed too toxic to continue. In the next cohort, two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities, and thus, the maximum tolerated dose of cediranib was established as 20 mg. During the six cycles of cisplatin-pemetrexed-cediranib, 20 mg, there were grade 3 toxicities (neutropenia and gastrointestinal) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia. No patients had any significant episodes of bleeding. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (n = 17 evaluable patients), the median progression-free survival was 12.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.9–17.2); according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (n = 19 evaluable patients), the median progression-free survival was 8.6 months (95% CI: 6.1–10.9). For all patients, the disease control rate at 6 weeks was 90% and median overall survival time was 16.2 months (95% CI: 10.5–28.7).ConclusionsCediranib combined with cisplatin-pemetrexed has a reasonable toxicity profile and preliminary promising efficacy. The phase II S0905 trial will evaluate the efficacy of the triplet regimen compared with the current standard of care, cisplatin-pemetrexed.     

Gefitinib in patients with malignant mesothelioma: a phase II study by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

PURPOSE: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B conducted a phase II study of gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase, in patients with previously untreated malignant mesothelioma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligible patients had unresectable pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma, measurable disease, no prior therapy, and performance status 0-1 by Cancer and Leukemia Group B criteria. Gefitinib (500 mg p.o.) was administered once a day for 21 days. Patients underwent restaging after every two cycles. Therapy was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: The most common grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (16%) and nausea (12%). Of 43 patients enrolled, 1 patient (2%) had a complete response, 1 patient (2%) had a partial response, 21 (49%) had stable disease lasting two to eight cycles, 15 (35%) had progressive disease, and 5 (12%) had early deaths. One-year survival was 32% [95% confidence interval (CI), 21-50%]. Median survival and failure-free survival were 6.8% (95% CI, 3.5-10.3) and 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.5-4.0), respectively. The 3-month failure-free survival was 40% (95% CI, 25-56%). EGFR expression score by immunohistochemistry done in 28 patients was categorized as low (EGFR 1+ or 2+) or high (EGFR 3+) expression: 97% had EGFR overexpression (2+ or 3+). The median and 3-month failure-free survival were 3.6 months and 40% for those patients with low EGFR expression compared with 8.1 and 40% for those with high EGFR expression. CONCLUSIONS: Although 97% of patients with mesothelioma had EGFR overexpression, gefitinib was not active in malignant mesothelioma. EGFR expression does not correlate with failure-free survival.     

High-dose ifosfamide in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: phase II trial from the Groupe français de pneumo-cancérologie (GFPC)

PURPOSE: To assess the toxicity and efficacy of high dose ifosfamide in stage IV NSCLC. METHODS: In a previous trial, we have determined maximum tolerated dose for 3-days ifosfamide treatment by 3-weeks schedule as 9 g/m2 according to hematologic tolerance. We therefore set up a phase II to study the toxicity and efficacy of this schedule in chemotherapy naive metastatic NSCLC. Ifosfamide (+ mesna 1 g/m2) was administered by a two hour infusion (3 g/m2) for three days every three weeks. Patients received three mesna bolus infusions (1 g/m2) at 4, 8 and 12 hours after the end of ifosfamide infusion. Antitumoral efficacy was performed after 2 cycles and treatment could be pursued for responding patients until disease progression. From september 1995 to January 1997, 31 patients have been included in this study. Median age was 60.7 years +/- 1.33 (41-70) for 27 males and 4 females. Patients (pts) presented metastases in lung for 10 pts, bone for 10 pts, liver for 6 pts, adrenal for 4 pts and multiorgan metastatic localisation for 1 patient. Seven patients were unassessable: 1 lost for follow-up, 1 sudden death, 5 treatment interruptions before evaluation time and 3 toxic deaths (9.6%). Toxicity: neutropenia grade 4 (10 pts and 1 death), cardiotoxicity grade 4 (1 pt) and 2 deaths following neurotoxicity grade 4. We achieve 4 partial responses (13%, 95CI: 3.6-29.8), 10 progressive diseases (32.3%, 95CI: 16.7-51.4) and 10 stabilizations (32.3%, 95CI: 16.7-51.4). Median response duration was 91 days +/- 55 d. Median survival was 9.3 months, e.g. 280 days (8-863). Overall survival at one year is 48%. CONCLUSION: This modality of high dose ifosfamide is as effective as standard monotherapy schedules in stage IV NSCLC. Unexpected toxicities particularly hematological ones could be due to a short duration of fractionated treatment. Results in term of survival leads us to further evaluate ifosfamide monotherapy treatment on a 5-day schedule basis.     

A Phase II study of paclitaxel and ifosfamide for patients with advanced refractory carcinoma of the urothelium.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium has limitations, and new therapies need to be evaluated. METHODS: Ifosfamide 1.0 gm/m2 on Days 1-4 and paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion on Day 4 were administered to 26 patients with locally unresectable or metastatic TCC. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles; dose escalation was dependent on whether Grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred. RESULTS: There were 24 males and 2 females, with a median age of 66 years and a median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0. The median number of cycles administered was 3. Twelve patients had Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities, including 1 patient who died of a gastrointestinal hemorrhage while pancytopenic. There were no episodes of neutropenic fever. Two patients each had a complete response (CR) that lasted 5 and 28 months, respectively (response rate: 15%; 95% CI: 2-45%), among the 13 patients who had received prior chemotherapy. Of the 13 patients without prior chemotherapy, there were 3 with complete responses and 1 with a partial response ranging from 8 to 25+ months (RR: 30.7%; 95% CI: 9-61%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ifosfamide and paclitaxel is well tolerated and can produce objective responses in patients who are chemona?ve or have had prior therapy. For previously untreated patients, the addition of ifosfamide does not appear to result in a better response rate than single agent paclitaxel; and for previously treated patients, the addition of paclitaxel does not appear to result in a better response rate than single agent ifosfamide.     

Irinotecan for malignant mesothelioma A phase II trial by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B

PURPOSE: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a multi-center phase II trial to evaluate the activity of irinotecan in malignant mesothelioma (CALGB protocol 9733). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients accrued between January 1998 and January 1999 received irinotecan 125 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion over 90 min weekly for 4 weeks, every 6 weeks. Eligibility included a performance status of 0-2 by CALGB criteria, and no prior chemotherapy. Twenty-five patients had pleural mesothelioma; two patients had peritoneal mesothelioma, and one patient had pericardial mesothelioma. Sixty-one percent of patients had epithelial histology. RESULTS: There were no complete or partial responders. Thirty-three percent of patients had stable disease and 52% were shown to have progressive disease at the first reassessment. One patient was not evaluable for response. Median survival from study entry was 9.3 months (95% CI 4.5-13.2 months); 1-year survival was estimated at 46% (95% CI 28-65%). Toxicity was moderately severe. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia in 28% of patients, lymphopenia in 43%, and diarrhea in 18%. Three patients died of treatment-related toxicities. All three experienced grade 4 diarrhea, two also had neutropenic sepsis. CONCLUSION: Single-agent irinotecan in this dose and schedule has considerable toxicity in patients with malignant mesothelioma and has no anti-tumor activity. The relatively long median survival seen in this study principally reflects the prognostic features of the accrued patients.     

A phase II study of ifosfamide, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma previously treated with platinum chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of ifosfamide, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (IFL) as a second-line chemotherapy regimen in patients with recurrent undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) previously treated with platinum/5-FU. Between June 1997 and February 1999, 18 patients were entered into the study. 3 patients had loco-regional recurrence, 12 had distant metastases and 3 had both loco-regional recurrence and distant metastases. All patients had previously received platinum/5-FU as adjuvant or palliative treatments. The IFL regimen consisting of ifosfamide 1.2 g/m(2) (with mesna), 5-FU 375 mg/m(2) and leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) for 5 days and was repeated every 21 days. The dose of ifosfamide was escalated to 1.4 and 1.6 g/m(2) in subsequent cycles according to the bone marrow toxicity, and the dose of 5-FU to 450 and 525 mg/m(2) according to the severity of mucositis. Patients received a median of 3 cycles of IFL (range: 2-6), with a median total ifosfamide dose of 21 g/m(2) (range: 13-46) and a median total 5-FU dose of 6.75 g/m(2) (range: 4.1-14.7). The median follow-up was 10 months (range: 4-25). 9 patients (50%) achieved a partial response and 1 patient (6%) achieved a complete response, with an overall response rate of 56% (95% confidence interval (CI): 32-80%). For those patients who responded to IFL, 8 had subsequent disease progression on follow-up, with a median response duration of 7.1 months (95% CI: 5.3-8.9). The median time to progression for all patients was 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.2-8.7). 12 patients are still alive with an estimated 1-year survival probability rate of 51%. Treatments were well tolerated, only 1 patient had grade 3 emesis. None of the patients had grade 3/4 anaemia, leucopenia or thrombocytopenia, although IFL was discontinued in 1 patient because of persisting thrombocytopenia. IFL is an effective second-line regimen in patients with recurrent NPC and is well tolerated with mild toxicity. Combining platinum and IFL in chemona?ve patients may further improve the overall response rate and duration and is worth investigating in future trials.     

A phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with unresectable or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the imidazotetrazine derivative temozolomide for patients with unresectable or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. METHODS: Twenty-five of 26 patients were eligible and assessable for toxicity and response. Temozolomide was administered twice daily on a 12-hour schedule for 5 days as an oral bolus dose of 200 mg/m(2) followed by 9 doses of 90 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks. RESULTS: There were 2 partial responses, 2 mixed responses, and 3 patients with stable disease that lasted > 6 months, for an overall objective response rate of 8%. At a median follow-up of 13.2 months, the median progression-free survival and the median overall survival were 2.0 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.7-2.3) and 13.2 months (95% CI, 4.7-31.1), respectively. All responding patients had leiomyosarcoma of uterine or nonuterine origin; and, in a subset analysis of these patients, the objective response rate was 18% (2 of 11 patients), with disease stabilization occurring in 3 of 11 patients (27%). For this subgroup, at a median follow-up of 24.4 months, the median progression-free survival and the median overall survival were 3.9 months (95% CI, 1.9-21.9) and 30.8 months (lower-bound 95% CI, 7.8), respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths or National Cancer Institute Grade 4 toxicities. Grade 3 toxicities included nausea, anemia, fatigue, elevated alkaline phosphatase levels and nonneutropenic fever (1 patient each). CONCLUSIONS: Temozolomide at the dose schedule employed in the current study was tolerated well and had modest activity against previously treated unresectable or metastatic leiomyosarcoma of both uterine and nonuterine origin.     

Ifosfamide, mesna, and interferon-alpha2A combination chemoimmunotherapy in malignant mesothelioma

Our aim was to determine the efficacy of ifosfamide, mesna, and interferon alpha combination therapy in malignant mesothelioma (MM) patients. Fourty-two patients (39 evaluable) with histologically proven MM were enrolled into this study from January 1999 to October 2002. The drug schedule consisted of a combination of ifosfamide, 3000 mg/m2 1-3 d intravenous infusion (iv), the uroprotective agent mesna, 3000 mg/m2 1-3 d iv every 3 wk, and interferon alpha2a, 4.5 MU subcutaneously (sc) 3 d/wk for 6 mo as first-line chemotherapy. Overall, 140 cycles were administered to the 39 patients (median, 3.5 cycles; range, 1 to 6 cycles). Among the 39 patients, 8 partial remissions (PR) (21%) were observed. Thirteen patients (33%) had stable disease for at least 8 wk and 18 (46%) had progressive disease. Overall survival (OAS) and progression free survival (PFS) for all patients were 10.0 +/- 2.9 mo (95%CI 4.3-15.7) and 5.0 +/- 1.9 mo (95%CI 1.38-8.62), respectively. One and two year survival rates were calculated as 39% and 5%, respectively. All of the PR patients had the epithelial type of MM. Their survival time was 21.0 +/- 5.7 mo (95% CI 9.9-32.1) and significantly longer than that of nonresponders (p=0.0061). The toxicity of the drug combination was mild and well tolerated. There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were seen in 10 patients (26%) and 3 patients (8%), respectively. Chemotherapy was stopped in three patients because of renal function deficiency. One of these patients who had peritoneal MM required hemodialysis. In conclusion, this combination therapy showed encouraging antitumor activity with modest toxicity.     

Phase II study of ifosfamide plus vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with combination chemotherapy

Forty-six patients were included in a phase II study to evaluate the response rate and toxicity of a combination of ifosfamide and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with one or more regimens of chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of ifosfamide 1.6 g/m² IV days 1-3 (with mesna) and vinorelbine 25 mg/m² IV days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks up to 6 cycles. The median age was 55 years (range 40-76), the World Health Organization (WHO) performance status was 0-1 in 93% of the patients and 2 in the remaining 7%. In all, 43% had received two or more previous lines of chemotherapy, and 91% had been treated with anthracyclines. Forty-four patients were evaluable for response, and all patients for toxicity. The overall response rate was 36.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.4-52.2]. Stabilization was observed in 20.4% and progression in 43.2%. The median time to progression was 25 weeks (95% CI 14-36). Median relative dose intensity (=actual received dose intensity/planned dose intensity) was 0.99 for ifosfamide and 0.80 for vinorelbine. The main toxicity was hematological, with 63% of the patients experiencing grade 3-4 neutropenia. With a moderate toxicity, this is an active regimen that may be taken into consideration in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients when further chemotherapy is indicated.     

Treatment of invasive thymoma with single-agent ifosfamide.

PURPOSE: To evaluate single-agent ifosfamide in the treatment of invasive thymoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients (eight male and seven female) with histologically confirmed invasive thymoma were treated. The median age was 48 years (range, 23 to 76 years). Four patients had stage III disease, seven patients had stage IVa disease, and four patients had stage IVb disease. The most common histologic type was lymphoepithelial. Seven patients had received prior treatment, including one patient who received chemotherapy. Ifosfamide 1.5 g/m(2) was given on days 1 to 5, with mesna as a uroprotector. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were assessable for response. Five complete responses (38.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 17.7% to 64.5%) and one partial response (7.7%; 95% CI, 1.4% to 33.3%) were seen. The median duration of complete response was 66+ months (range, 25 to 87 months), and the estimated survival rate 5 years after ifosfamide treatment was 57% (SE, 32% to 79%). The most frequent toxicities were nausea, vomiting, and leucopenia, but these were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Single-agent ifosfamide possesses significant activity against invasive thymoma and is comparable to currently used combination regimens. The inclusion of ifosfamide in combination therapy, particularly in place of cyclophosphamide in regimens such as cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide, needs to be evaluated.     

Randomized trial of cisplatin and ifosfamide with or without bleomycin in squamous carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study.

PURPOSE: Phase II trial reports have suggested that the addition of bleomycin to the combination of cisplatin and ifosfamide may improve response rates and possible survival in squamous carcinoma of the cervix. This study prospectively evaluates the combination of bleomycin to this regimen in women with histologically proven advanced recurrent or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible women were randomized to receive either cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)), ifosfamide (5 g/m(2) over 24 hours), and mesna (6 g/m(2) during ifosfamide infusion and the following 12 hours) (CI) versus bleomycin 30 units over 24 hours on day 1 followed by cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)), ifosfamide (5 g/m(2) over 24 hours), and mesna (6 g/m(2) during ifosfamide infusion and the following 12 hours) (CIB). Three hundred three women were enrolled onto this trial, of which 287 were assessable. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between CI and CIB with regard to response rates (32% v 31.2%, respectively), progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival. PFS and survival were associated with initial performance status (PS). Patients with a PS of 0 experienced a lower rate of failure (P =.013) and a lower risk of death (P =.009) compared with patients with PS of 2. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea and vomiting. Neither regimen was associated with a significant increase in incidence of these toxicities. CONCLUSION: The CI regimen was virtually identical to CIB with regard to response rate, PFS, survival, and toxicity profile. Thus, the addition of bleomycin in the dose-schedule employed to cisplatin and ifosfamide did not improve outcome in patients with advanced cervical cancer.     

Phase II study of Taxol combined With ifosfamide and carboplatin in the treatment of stage IIIb-IV non-small-cell lung cancer

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the activity and the toxicity of an original combination of paclitaxel (Taxol), ifosfamide, and carboplatin in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sixty-one patients with previously untreated stage IIIB-IV NSCLC were enrolled by five institutions. Paclitaxel was given at the dose of 200 mg/m iv in 3 hours, ifosfamide (with mesna) at the dose of 3 g/m and carboplatin at an area under the curve 5, on day 1, every 21 days for a total of six cycles in responding or stabilized patients. Among the 59 patients evaluable for response, 2 complete remissions and 25 partial remissions were achieved for an overall response rate of 45.7% (95% CI = 32.7-59.2). According to an intention-to-treat analysis, the response rate was 44.2%. Thirteen patients had a stable disease, whereas 19 progressed. The median time to progression was 7.7 months (range: 1-18), whereas the median overall survival was 10 months (range: 1-30+). The 1-year survival rate was 43%. Hematologic toxicity was exceptionally mild, and peripheral neurologic toxicity of grade III was experienced by only three patients. There was one toxic death. This original triplet regimen based on paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and carboplatin has proved active, safe, and easy to deliver on an outpatient basis for patients with advanced NSCLC. Randomized studies both versus carboplatin-paclitaxel and other triplets are clearly warranted.     

A phase III randomised study comparing two different dose-intensity regimens as induction chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation in patients with advanced locoregional non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the role of chemotherapy dose intensity in patients with initially unresectable non-metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with survival as primary end point, by testing two different regimens as induction chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had pathologically proven NSCLC, an initially unresectable non-metastatic tumour without homolateral malignant pleural effusion, no prior history of malignancy and had received no prior therapy. Treatment was randomised for chemotherapy between three courses of MIP (mitomycin C 6 mg/m2; ifosfamide 3 g/m2; cisplatin 50 mg/m2) or SuperMIP (mitomycin C 6 mg/m2; ifosfamide 4.5 g/m2; cisplatin 60 mg/m2, carboplatine 200 mg/m2), followed by chest irradiation (60 Gy; five times per week, for 6 weeks). If the tumour became resectable after chemotherapy, surgery was performed, followed by mediastinal irradiation. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients were eligible: 176 in the MIP arm and 175 in the SuperMIP arm, with 43% and 51% stages IIIA and IIIB, respectively. There was a significantly higher objective response rate with SuperMIP (46%) compared with MIP (35%) (P=0.03) [95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between the response rates, 1% to 22%]. After induction chemotherapy, surgery was performed in 54 (15%) patients (27 per arm) and chest irradiation in 203 (57%) patients (102 in the MIP arm and 101 in the SuperMIP). In terms of survival, there was no statistically significant difference between the two study arms (P=0.16), with median survival times of, for MIP and SuperMIP, respectively, 12.5 (95% CI 10.1-14.9) and 11.2 (95% CI 9.7-12.8) months. Haematological toxicity and dosage reductions were higher with SuperMIP, which was nevertheless associated with a significantly increased absolute dose intensity. CONCLUSIONS: High dose-intensity induction chemotherapy does not improve survival in initially unresectable non metastatic NSCLC.     

Intravenous ifosfamide/mesna is associated with depletion of plasma thiols without depletion of leukocyte glutathione.

Depletion of cellular glutathione (GSH) enhances the efficacy of many anticancer agents in preclinical systems. Limited published data showing depletion of GSH in vitro and in patients by ifosfamide and/or mesna provided the rationale for a Phase I trial. Ifosfamide and mesna were infused over 24 and 36 h, respectively, at equal daily doses; carboplatin was given after ifosfamide to a target plasma area under the curve of 4 mg x min x ml(-1). Plasma and peripheral WBC thiols were quantitated by high-performance liquid chromatography. The dose of ifosfamide was escalated from 2 to 8 g/m2; the maximum tolerated dose was 6 g/m2. Significant depletion in plasma cysteine and homocysteine, precursors for GSH synthesis, was observed (maximum, 95% to >99% at 8 g/m2). Plasma mesna and cysteine/ homocysteine levels were inversely correlated; nadir levels of cysteine/homocysteine were maintained for several hours after ifosfamide infusion had stopped and while mesna infusion was continuing. In vitro coincubation experiments confirmed that mesna reduces these thiols from disulfides to sulfhydryls, which are readily cleared, as evidenced by the significantly increased rate of excretion of cysteine in urine. In contrast, ifosfamide/mesna treatment caused a moderate depletion of plasma GSH in only 60% of the patients, with a nadir at 24 h and recovery immediately after the end of ifosfamide infusion. The GSH depletion in these patients was not dose related. The profile of GSH recovery in plasma after ifosfamide and the fact that mesna could not reduce GSH disulfides in vitro suggest that the observed GSH depletion in plasma in 60% of the patients may be related to direct reactions of GSH with ifosfamide metabolites and/or mesna. Our results indicate that mesna is a modulator of GSH precursors and that a prolonged infusion of mesna may be required to achieve GSH precursor starvation and the consequent GSH depletion in cells.     

Chemotherapy with high dose ifosfamide/mesna plus cisplatin for the treatment of ovarian cancer: a study of the Grupo de Estudio y Tratamiento Latino-Americano del Cancer

Twenty-one evaluable patients with FIGO stages II-IV epithelial ovarian cancer, median age 57 (range 47-75 years), were treated with ifosfamide (IF), 3 g/m2 diluted in 500 ml saline solution, 8 hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1-5; mesna 20% of IF dose, i.v. bolus injection, was given at hours 0 and 4; mesna 40% of IF dose by oral route at hours 8 and 12, days 1-5; plus cisplatin 20 mg/m2 diluted in 500 ml saline solution, 2 hour i.v. infusion, days 1-5. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. All patients had metastatic lesions (mesentery, pleura, colon, cervix, abdominal wall, lung, liver, bladder, and nodes). Toxicity ranged from mild to moderate. All patients experienced alopecia, nausea, and vomiting. Neutropenia and anemia ranged from mild to moderate. One patient experienced mild brain confusion and two patients microscopic hematuria. Ten clinically complete responses (47%) and five clinically partial responses (23%) were registered, for an overall 70% objective response. However, after a second look performance in 10 patients with clinically complete response, six of 10 patients showed a pathological complete response and four showed pathological partial response. The median duration of complete response is about 33 months, and median partial response duration is 14 months. Although the numbers are small, these data indicate that combination chemotherapy with high dose ifosfamide/mesna plus cisplatin may be an active treatment for advanced ovarian carcinoma.