Positive surgical margins are a risk factor for significant biochemical recurrence only in intermediate-risk disease

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Positive surgical margins (PSMs) after radical prostatectomy are common, although their impact on the risk of disease recurrence is unknown. We examined the impact of PSMs on the risk of ‘significant’ biochemical recurrence stratified by their risk of occult metastatic disease. We find that only in intermediate‐risk disease does the presence of a PSM have a significant impact on the risk of recurrence, and this represents a failure of technique. By contrast, for high‐ and low‐risk disease, the risk of recurrence is driven by intrinsic tumour biology, and the presence of a PSM has little impact on outcome.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To determine the impact of surgical margin status on the risk of significant biochemical recurrence (prostate‐specific antigen [PSA] doubling time <3, <6 or <9 months) after prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

• ? Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with complete clinical and pathological data and detailed PSA follow‐up were identified from two prospectively recorded databases.
• ? Patients were stratified according to their risk of occult systemic disease (low risk: PSA < 10 ng/dL, pT2 stage and Gleason score ≤6; intermediate risk: PSA 10–20 ng/dL, pT2 stage and/or Gleason score 7; high: PSA > 20 ng/dL or pT3‐4 stage or Gleason score 8–10) and the impact of a positive surgical margin (PSM) within each stratum determined by univariable and multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

• ? Of 1514 patients identified, 276 (18.2%), 761 (50.3%) and 477 (31.5%) were classified as having low‐, intermediate‐ and high‐risk disease respectively.
• ? A total of 370 (24.4%) patients had a PSM and with a median follow‐up of 22.2 months, and 165 (7%) patients had a biochemical recurrence.
• ? Sufficient PSA data was available to calculate PSA doubling times in 151/165 patients (91.5%).
• ? The PSM rate rose significantly, from 11% in low‐risk to 43% in high‐risk disease (P < 0.001), with similar positive associations noted with tumour grade, stage and serum PSA (P < 0.001).
• ? Patients with low‐risk disease had essentially identical risks of significant biochemical recurrence over the study period, regardless of surgical margin status. By contrast, in patients with both intermediate‐ and high‐risk disease, a PSM was a strong predictor of significant biochemical recurrence on univariable analysis. On multivariable analysis, howver, PSM predicted significant disease recurrence in intermediate‐risk disease only.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? PSM is a risk factor for significant biochemical recurrence only in intermediate risk disease.

     

Comparison of the rate, location and size of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4

OBJECTIVE

• ? To review and compare the rate, location and size of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? The study comprised 200 patients who underwent RALP and 200 patients who underwent LRP up to January 2008.
• ? We compared patient age, body mass index, preoperative prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), preoperative stage and grade, prostate size, pathological stage and grade and neurovascular bundle preservation, as well as PSM rate, size and location.
• ? Continuous and categorical data were compared using Student’s t‐test and Pearson’s chi‐squared test.
• ? Multivariate regression analyses were used to identify preoperative and intraoperative predictors of PSMs.

RESULTS

• ? Although the PSM rate was similar between the two groups (LRP: 12% vs RALP: 13.5%; P= 0.76), location and size were not. PSMs after LRP were mostly at the apex (58.3%; P= 0.038), while most PSMs after RALP were posterolateral ([PL] 48%; P= 0.046).
• ? In addition, the median margin size after RALP was significantly smaller than after LRP (RALP: 2 mm vs LRP: 3.5 mm; P= 0.041).
• ? In univariate and multivariate analyses, tumour‐node‐metastasis (TNM) stage and preoperative PSA were the only independent preoperative predictors of PSMs (P= 0.044 and P= 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

• ? The PSM risk is dependent on TNM stage and preoperative PSA and not the surgical technique, when comparing LRP with RALP.

     

The impact of nerve sparing on incidence and location of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy has been associated with increased risk of positive surgical margins due to the close anatomical relationship of the neurovascular bundle to the posterolateral aspect of the prostatic fascia. Our study of 945 men who underwent radical prostatectomy be one experienced surgeon found no increased risk of positive surgical margins, whether the cancer was organ confined or extracapsular extension was present.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To examine whether nerve‐sparing surgery (NSS) is a risk factor for positive surgical margins (PSMs) in patients with either organ‐confined prostate cancer or extracapsular extension (ECE).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Clinicopathological outcome data on 945 consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) were prospectively collected.
• ? All patients underwent RP (bilateral, unilateral or non‐NSS) by one surgeon between 2002 and 2007.
• ? Risk of PSMs and their locations with respect to NSS was determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for preoperative risk factors for PSMs within pT2, pT3a and pT3b tumours.

RESULTS

• ? Overall a PSM was identified in 19.6% of patients in an unscreened population with mean prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.1 ng/mL.
• ? There was no significant difference in rates of PSMs between NSS groups on multivariate analysis (P= 0.147).
• ? There was no significant difference in pT2 (P= 0.880), pT3a (P= 0.175) or pT3b (P= 0.354) tumours.
• ? The only significant predictor of PSMs was preoperative PSA level (risk ratio 1.289, P= 0.006).
• ? There was no significant difference in the location of PSMs except for the pT3a group, where the patients that had bilateral NSS were at higher risk of a posterolateral PSM (P= 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

• ? With appropriate selection of patients, NSS does not increase the risk of PSMs, whether the cancer is organ confined or ECE is present.
• ? The adverse impact of the NSS procedure in the hands of an experienced surgeon is minimal and is a realistic compromise to obtain the increase in health‐related quality of life offered by NSS.

     

The natural history of metastatic progression in men with prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up

Study Type – Prognosis (cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy often develop subsequent metastases. However, the natural history of metastatic progression in men who have not received subsequent therapies before developing metastases has been understudied. Here, we describe the largest known cohort of men with PSA‐recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy who have not received additional treatments before metastasis. We characterize metastatic risk based on clinical variables, and we show that Gleason score and PSA doubling time are the strongest predictors of metastasis‐free survival. We present tables stratifying metastatic risk by these two variables.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To describe metastasis‐free survival (MFS) in men with prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) recurrence following radical prostatectomy, and to define clinical prognostic factors modifying metastatic risk.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? We conducted a retrospective analysis of 450 men treated with prostatectomy at a tertiary hospital between July 1981 and July 2010 who developed PSA recurrence (≥0.2 ng/mL) and never received adjuvant or salvage therapy before the development of metastatic disease.
• ? We estimated MFS using the Kaplan–Meier method, and investigated factors influencing the risk of metastasis using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

• ? Median follow‐up after prostatectomy was 8.0 years, and after biochemical recurrence was 4.0 years. At last follow‐up, 134 of 450 patients (29.8%) had developed metastases, while median MFS was 10.0 years.
• ? Using multivariable regressions, two variables emerged as independently predictive of MFS: PSA doubling time (<3.0 vs 3.0–8.9 vs 9.0–14.9 vs ≥15.0 months) and Gleason score (≤6 vs 7 vs 8–10).
• ? Using these stratifications of Gleason score and PSA doubling time, tables were constructed to predict median, 5‐ and 10‐year MFS after PSA recurrence. In different patient subsets, median MFS ranged from 1 to 15 years.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? In men undergoing prostatectomy, MFS after PSA recurrence is variable and is most strongly influenced by PSA doubling time and Gleason score. These parameters serve to stratify men into different risk groups with respect to metastatic progression.
• ? Our findings may provide the background for appropriate selection of patients, treatments and endpoints for clinical trials.

     

Impact of a tertiary Gleason pattern 4 or 5 on clinical failure and mortality after radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer

Study Type – Prognosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? It is known that a tertiary Gleason grade pattern 4 or 5 found in RP specimens has a negative impact on recurrence rate regarding biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy. This is the first publication addressing clinical outcome in patients with a tertiary Gleason grade pattern 4 or 5 showing a negative influence on clinical failure rates.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To investigate the impact of a tertiary Gleason grade (TGG) pattern 4 or 5 on clinical failure, as the presence of a TGG pattern 4 or 5 in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens has been associated with biochemical failure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? In all, 151 consecutive patients undergoing RP between 1985 and 2006 were reviewed, and 148 patients met study inclusion criteria.
• ? The RP specimens were pathologically re‐examined and the presence of a TGG pattern 4 or 5 was recorded.
• ? The endpoint was clinical failure defined as local recurrence and/or development of metastasis at a mean follow‐up of 108 months.
• ? Univariate analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

• ? Clinical failure was more likely among men with presence of a TGG pattern 4 or 5 than in men without a TGG pattern 4 or 5 (P= 0.006). In the subgroup of patients with Gleason score 7 the presence of a TGG 5 was significantly associated with clinical failure rate (P= 0.002).
• ? In patients with Gleason score <7 or >7, a TGG pattern 4 or 5 was not associated with increased failure rates.
• ? Multivariate Cox regression analyses in patients with Gleason score 7 showed that a TGG pattern 5 was a statistically significant predictor of clinical failure when adjusting for pathological stage, surgical margin status, extraprostatic extension and seminal vesicle invasion (hazard ratio 4.03, 95% confidence interval 1.72–9.46; P= 0.001).
• ? Further subgroup analyses showed that a TGG pattern 5 was associated with statistically higher clinical progression rates in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 (P= 0.03).
• ? In patients with Gleason score 4 + 3, a TGG pattern 5 was associated with a trend towards a higher clinical progression rate, although this was not statistically significant (P= 0.189).

CONCLUSION

• ? A TGG pattern 4 or 5 is associated with decreased clinical recurrence‐free survival in Gleason score 7.

     

Gleason 7 prostate cancer treated with low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy: lack of impact of primary Gleason pattern on biochemical failure

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? There appears to be a clear difference in cancer control outcomes for patients with Gleason scores of 3+4 and those with scores of 4+3 after radical prostatectomy. It has been documented that patients with Gleason 4+3 prostate cancer have higher incidences of non‐organ‐confined disease than those with primary pattern 3. Higher rates of extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion and positive margins have been found to be associated with primary pattern 4 over 3. These higher rates of non‐organ‐confined disease can lead to increased biochemical failure, which, in turn, can lead to higher mortality rates. This study provides information on the prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in the brachytherapy management of prostate cancer. Study Type – Prognosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4

OBJECTIVES

• ? To report the biochemical outcomes for Gleason 7 prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy.
• ? To analyse the impact of the primary Gleason pattern as well as other disease‐ and treatment‐related factors on outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? A total of 560 patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer were treated between 1990 and 2008 with brachytherapy, alone or in combination with hormonal therapy and/or external beam radiation therapy.
• ? There were 352 patients with Gleason pattern 3+4 and 208 with Gleason pattern 4+3.
• ? The mean (range) presenting PSA level was 11.2 (1–300) ng/mL, and the median was 7.8 ng/mL.
• ? The presenting clinical stages were T1b in 1%, T1c in 33%, T2a in 16%, T2b in 32%, T2c in 16% and T3 in 2% of patients.

RESULTS

• ? The actuarial freedom from biochemical failure rate at 10 years was 82%.
• ? There was no significant difference between 10‐year freedom from biochemical failure rates for patients with Gleason scores of 3+4 (79%) and those with scores of 4+3 (82%).
• ? Biologically effective dose and presenting PSA level were both significant predictors of biochemical failure in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? The primary Gleason pattern in Gleason 7 prostate cancer shows no significant effect on biochemical failure when treated with brachytherapy.
• ? These results are different from those found after radical prostatectomy and are probably attributable to the enhanced local control afforded by a brachytherapy approach to this disease subset.

     

Prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer of biopsy Gleason score ≥ 8 via contemporary multi (≥ 12)-core prostate biopsy

Study Type – Prognostic (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Currently, controversy continues with regards to the efficacy of performing radical prostatectomy (RP) and the potential predictor of outcome after surgery in patients with prostate cancers of higher biopsy Gleason score. Among contemporary patients with biopsy Gleason score ≥8 who underwent RP alone, patients with pathologically organ‐confined disease demonstrated significantly better biochemical outcome than others. Serum PSA level and maximum tumour length in a biopsy core, independent predictors of organ‐confined disease, would be useful in the selection of candidates for RP among patients presenting with biopsy Gleason score ≥8.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To investigate the outcome of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer of biopsy Gleason score ≥ 8 diagnosed via contemporary prostate biopsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? We reviewed records of 151 patients who underwent RP for prostate cancer of biopsy Gleason score ≥ 8 detected via multi (≥12)‐core prostate biopsy without any neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment.
• ? Preoperative predictors of pathologically organ‐confined disease along with biochemical recurrence‐free survival were analyzed via multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

• ? For 151 total subjects, 5‐year estimated biochemical recurrence‐free survival rate was 41.0%. Patients with pathologically organ‐confined disease were observed to have much higher 5‐year biochemical recurrence‐free survival rate than those otherwise (72.1 vs 31.5%, P < 0.001).
• ? Serum PSA level (P= 0.031) and maximum tumour length in a biopsy core (P= 0.005) were observed to be significant preoperative predictors of having pathologically organ‐confined disease.
• ? As for biochemical recurrence‐free survival following RP, serum PSA (P= 0.023), biopsy Gleason score (P= 0.032), and percent of total tumour length in biopsy cores (P < 0.001) were observed be significant preoperative predictors on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

• ? Among contemporary patients with biopsy Gleason score ≥ 8 who underwent RP alone, patients with pathologically organ‐confined disease demonstrated significantly better biochemical outcome than others. Serum PSA level and maximum tumour length in a biopsy core, independent predictors of organ‐confined disease, would be useful in the selection of candidates for RP among patients presenting with biopsy Gleason score ≥ 8.

     

Preoperative characteristics of high-Gleason disease predictive of favourable pathological and clinical outcomes at radical prostatectomy

Study Type – Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Men with high‐risk prostate cancer experience recurrence, metastases and death at the highest rate in the prostate cancer population. Pathological stage at radical prostatectomy (RP) is the greatest predictor of recurrence and mortality in men with high‐grade disease. Preoperative models predicting outcome after RP are skewed by the large proportion of men with low‐ and intermediate‐risk features; there is a paucity of data about preoperative criteria to identify men with high‐grade cancer who may benefit from RP. The present study adds comprehensive biopsy data from a large cohort of men with high‐grade prostate cancer at biopsy. By adding biopsy parameters, e.g. number of high‐grade cores and >50% involvement of any core, to traditional predictors of outcome (prostate‐specific antigen concentration, clinical stage and Gleason sum), we can better inform men who present with high‐grade prostate cancer as to their risk of favourable or unfavourable disease at RP.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To investigate preoperative characteristics that distinguish favourable and unfavourable pathological and clinical outcomes in men with high biopsy Gleason sum (8–10) prostate cancer to better select men who will most benefit from radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? The Institutional Review Board‐approved institutional RP database (1982–2010) was analysed for men with high‐Gleason prostate cancer on biopsy; 842 men were identified.
• ? The 10‐year biochemical‐free (BFS), metastasis‐free (MFS) and prostate cancer‐specific survival (CSS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method to verify favourable pathology as men with Gleason <8 at RP or ≤ pT3a compared with men with unfavourable pathology with Gleason 8–10 and pT3b or N1.
• ? Preoperative characteristics were compared using appropriate comparative tests.
• ? Logistic regression determined preoperative predictors of unfavourable pathology.

RESULTS

• ? There was favourable pathology in 656 (77.9%) men. The 10‐year BFS, MFS and CSS were 31.0%, 60.9% and 74.8%, respectively.
• ? In contrast, men with unfavourable pathological findings had significantly worse 10‐year BFS, MFS and CSS, at 4.3%, 29.1% and 52.3%, respectively (all P < 0.001).
• ? In multivariable logistic regression, a prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) concentration of >10 ng/mL (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38–3.62, P= 0.001), advanced clinical stage (≥ cT2b; OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.55–4.21, P < 0.001), Gleason pattern 9 or 10 at biopsy (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.59–4.09, P < 0.001), increasing number of cores positive with high‐grade cancer (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01–1.34, P= 0.04) and >50% positive core involvement (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.17–4.35, P= 0.015) were predictive of unfavourable pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? Men with high‐Gleason sum at biopsy are at high risk for biochemical recurrence, metastasis and death after RP; men with high Gleason sum and advanced pathological stage (pT3b or N1) have the worst prognosis.
• ? Among men with high‐Gleason sum at biopsy, a PSA concentration of >10 ng/mL, clinical stage ≥ T2b, Gleason pattern 9 or 10, increasing number of cores with high‐grade cancer and >50% core involvement are predictive of unfavourable pathology.

     

A post‐radical‐prostatectomy nomogram incorporating new pathological variables and interaction terms for improved prognosis

Study Type – Prognosis (systematic review)
Level of Evidence 2a What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Nomograms are commonly used by urologists to assess a patient’s risk of developing biochemical failure (PSA recurrence) after radical prostatectomy. The nomograms currently available on websites and in the published literature do not take into account recent developments in pathological reporting which may improve our ability to more accurately predict patient prognosis. Furthermore, currently available nomograms treat all clinical predictors as independent variables without considering the possibility that these factors may be interlinked, which may alter their predictive value. Our study assesses the predictive value of several new pathological variables and demonstrates that the per cent of Gleason patterns 4 and/or 5 (% 4/5), intraductal prostatic carcinoma and prostate weight significantly improve the predictive value of a model based on established pathological variables. We also show that consideration of interactions between % 4/5, surgical margin status and extracapsular extension further improves our accuracy in predicting patient PSA recurrence. Finally, we find that published nomograms based on PSA recurrence defined as ≥0.4 ng/mL provide over‐optimistic predictions for prostate cancer patients where PSA recurrence was defined as ≥0.2 ng/mL.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To evaluate new variables in prostate pathology reporting including, the per cent of Gleason patterns 4 and/or 5 (% 4/5), presence or absence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDCP), tumour volume and the prostatic zone of tumour origin as predictors of post‐radical‐prostatectomy (RP) biochemical recurrence (BCR).
• ? To develop an optimal postoperative nomogram for patients with prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Our study cohort was 1939 eligible patients from the Abbott West Australian Prostatectomy Database.
• ? Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were developed to predict BCR which was defined as prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) ≥0.2 ng/mL.
• ? Our models and the 2009 Kattan postoperative nomogram were compared in terms of discrimination and calibration, with internal validation of our final model performed using bootstrapping methods. Our final model is presented as a nomogram.

RESULTS

• ? The Kattan nomogram was accurate in discriminating our patients according to risk (concordance index: 0.791) but calibration analysis indicated underestimation of patient risk, particularly for high‐risk disease.
• ? Our nomogram incorporates % 4/5, IDCP and prostate weight plus interaction terms between % 4/5, positive surgical margins and extracapsular extension, giving improved predictive accuracy (concordance index: 0.828) and calibration.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? Nomograms that predict risk of BCR defined as PSA ≥0.4 ng/mL may not be optimal for patient cohorts where BCR is defined as PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL.
• ? If our findings are validated in other populations, current post‐RP nomograms may be improved to a modest degree by incorporating the new variables prostate weight, IDCP and % 4/5, and by considering interactions between predictive variables.

     

Magnetic resonance imaging does not improve the prediction of misclassification of prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance when the most stringent selection criteria are based on the saturation biopsy scheme

Study Type – Diagnostic (case series) Level of Evidence 4

OBJECTIVE

• ? To investigate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in selecting patients for active surveillance (AS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? We identified prostate cancers patients who had undergone a 21‐core biopsy scheme and fulfilled the criteria as follows: prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level ≤10 ng/mL, T1–T2a disease, a Gleason score ≤6, <3 positive cores and tumour length per core <3 mm.
• ? We included 96 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy (RP) and a prostate MRI before surgery.
• ? The main end point of the study was the unfavourable disease features at RP, with or without the use of MRI as AS inclusion criterion.

RESULTS

• ? Mean age and mean PSA were 62.4 years and 6.1 ng/mL, respectively. Prostate cancer was staged pT3 in 17.7% of cases.
• ? The rate of unfavourable disease (pT3–4 and/or Gleason score ≥4 + 3) was 24.0%. A T3 disease on MRI was noted in 28 men (29.2%).
• ? MRI was not a significant predictor of pT3 disease in RP specimens (P = 0.980), rate of unfavourable disease (P = 0.604), positive surgical margins (P = 0.750) or Gleason upgrading (P = 0.314).
• ? In a logistic regression model, no preoperative parameter was an independent predictor of unfavourable disease in the RP specimen.
• ? After a mean follow‐up of 29 months, the recurrence‐free survival (RFS) was statistically equivalent between men with T3 on MRI and those with T1–T2 disease (P = 0.853).

CONCLUSION

• ? The results of the present study emphasize that, when the selection of patients for AS is based on an extended 21‐core biopsy scheme, and uses the most stringent inclusion criteria, MRI does not improve the prediction of high‐risk and/or non organ‐confined disease in a RP specimen.

     

Impact of surgical margin status on prostate‐cancer‐specific mortality

Study Type – Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Surgical margin status at radical prostatectomy (RP) has been shown to be a predictor of disease progression and the strongest predictor of benefit from adjuvant therapy, but the impact of a positive surgical margin (PSM) on long‐term prostate‐cancer‐specific survival is unknown. The PSM rate is dependent on the pathological stage of the cancer. In a recent multicentre nomogram for 15‐year prostate‐cancer‐specific mortality (PCSM) after RP, PSM was not significantly associated with PCSM, while Gleason score and pathological stage were the only significant predictors. This has not been validated in a single centre, and PSM has been shown to vary greatly with surgical technique. This is the first study on the impact of PSM on PCSM in a single surgeon's cohort. In other centres, the decision to administer adjuvant therapy may be influenced by surgical margin status. In this cohort, men routinely did not receive adjuvant therapy, affording the unique opportunity to study the long‐term implications of a PSM.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To examine the relative impact of a positive surgical margin (PSM) and other clinicopathological variables on prostate‐cancer‐specific mortality (PCSM) in a large retrospective cohort of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Between 1982 and 2011, 4569 men underwent RP performed by a single surgeon.
• ? Of the patient population, 4461 (97.6%) met all the inclusion criteria.
• ? The median (range) age was 58 (33–75) years and the median prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) was 5.4 ng/mL; RP Gleason score was ≤6 in 2834 (63.7%), 7 in 1351 (30.3%), and 8–10 in 260 (6.0%) patients; PSMs were found in 462 (10.4%) patients.
• ? Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the impact of a PSM on PCSM.

RESULTS

• ? At a median (range) follow‐up of 10 years (1–29), 187 men (4.3%) had died from prostate cancer.
• ? The 20‐year prostate‐cancer‐specific survival rate was 75% for those with a PSM and 93% for those without.
• ? Compared with those with a negative surgical margin, men with a PSM were more likely to be older (median age 60 vs 58 years) and to have undergone RP in the pre‐PSA era (36.6% vs 11.8%). Additionally, they were more likely to have a higher PSA level (median 7.6 vs 5.2 ng/mL), a Gleason score of ≥7 (58.7% vs 33.7%), and a non‐organ‐confined tumour (90.9% vs 30.6% [P < 0.001 for all]).
• ? In a univariate model for PCSM, PSM was highly significant (hazard ratio [HR] 5.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7–6.7, P < 0.001).
• ? In a multivariable model, adjusting for pathological variables and RP year, PSM remained an independent predictor of PCSM (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0–1.9, P= 0.036) with a modest effect relative to RP Gleason score (HR 5.7–12.6) and pathological stage (HR 2.2–11.0 [P < 0.001]).

CONCLUSION

• ? Although a PSM has a statistically significant adverse effect on prostate‐cancer‐specific survival in multivariable analysis, Gleason grade and pathological stage were stronger predictors.

     

Low pretreatment total testosterone (< 3 ng/mL) predicts extraprostatic disease in prostatectomy specimens from patients with preoperative localized prostate cancer

Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4

OBJECTIVE

• ? To investigate the relationship between pretreatment testosterone levels and pathological specimen characteristics, by prospectively examining serum androgen concentrations in a well‐studied cohort of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? A total of 107 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer had an assay of total testosterone before laparoscopic RP at our institution.
• ? The results were classified into two groups based on the total serum testosterone: group1, <3 ng/mL; group 2, ≥3 ng/mL.
• ? Student’s t‐test was used to compare continuous variables, and Fisher’s exact test or the chi‐squared test was used to compare categorical variables.
• ? Survival curves were established using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log‐rank test. In all tests, P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

• ? All patients had localized prostate cancer based on digital rectal examination (DRE) and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Groups 1 and 2 were similar in terms of age, body mass index, preoperative co‐morbidities (cardiovascular and diabetes mellitus), clinical stage of prostate cancer and preoperative PSA levels.
• ? In pathological specimens, low total testosterone (<3 ng/mL) was an independent risk factor for high Gleason score (>7) and for locally advanced pathological stage (pT3 and pT4).
• ? Higher preoperative testosterone correlated with disease confined to the gland.
• ? There was no association between serum testosterone levels and surgical margin status, on the one hand, and biochemical recurrence on the other.

CONCLUSION

• ? Low serum testosterone appears to be predictive of aggressive disease (Gleason score >7 and extraprostatic disease, pathological stage >pT2) in patients who underwent RP for localized prostate cancer.

     

The value of urinary prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) scores in predicting pathological features at radical prostatectomy

Study Type – Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? PCA3 scores correlate to numerous histoprognostic factors, specifically tumour volume and positive surgical margins. These results may have a clinical impact in the near future on the selection of patients eligible to undergo active surveillance and nerve‐sparing surgery.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To assess correlations between Prostate CAncer gene 3 (PCA3) levels and pathological features of radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens, which define cancer aggressiveness.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? After digital rectal examination (DRE), first‐catch urine was collected from 160 patients with localized prostate cancer. The PCA3 score was calculated using the Gene Probe Progensa^? assay.
• ? PCA3 scores were then correlated to the pathological features of the RP specimens.

RESULTS

• ? PCA3 scores correlated significantly with tumour volume (r= 0.34, P < 0.01). A PCA3 score of >35 was an independent predictor in a multivariate analysis of a tumour volume >0.5 mL (odds ratio [OR] 2.7, P= 0.04).
• ? It was also an independent predictor of positive surgical margins (OR 2.4, P= 0.04). Receiver–operator characteristic curves indicated PCA3 as the most accurate predictor of positive margins (area under the curve [AUC] 0.62), in addition to a positive biopsy percentage (AUC 0.52).
• ? There was also a significant difference in the mean PCA3 score between Gleason score patient groups (6 vs ≥7) and pathological stage groups (pT0/2 vs pT3/4).

CONCLUSIONS

• ? PCA3 scores correlate to numerous histoprognostic factors, specifically tumour volume and positive surgical margins.
• ? These results may have a clinical impact in the near future on the selection of patients eligible to undergo active surveillance and nerve‐sparing surgery.

     

The role of transrectal saturation biopsy in tumour localization: pathological correlation after retropubic radical prostatectomy and implication for focal ablative therapy

Study Type – Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? The traditional transrectal sextant and extended biopsy schemes demonstrated low accuracy in predicting unilateral prostate cancer on radical prostatectomy specimens. We examined the accuracy of an initial saturation biopsy (24‐core) to predict unilateral prostate cancer on radical prostatectomy specimens.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To evaluate the accuracy of an initial 24‐core prostate biopsy scheme (PBx24) in predicting unilateral prostate cancer (PCa) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Between 2005 and 2008, 203 consecutive patients underwent PBx24 followed by RP for PCa. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the accuracy of unilateral PCa on PBx24 to predict unilateral PCa in RP specimens.
• ? The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were also calculated. Moreover, in patients with unilateral PCa on biopsy, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses tested the relationship between the presence of unilateral PCa in an RP specimen and the variables: age, prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), total prostate volume, clinical stage, primary Gleason grade, secondary Gleason grade and the number of positive cores.

RESULTS

• ? PCa cores were unilateral in 115 patients (56.7%) on biopsy. Of those, only 26 (22.6%) had unilateral PCa in the RP specimen (AUC, 72.9%; PPV, 22.6%; NPV, 98.8%). In patients with clinically low‐risk tumours, only 17 of 63 (27%) had a unilateral PCa on PBx24 and in the RP specimen (AUC, 59.1%; PPV, 27.0%; NPV, 100.0%).
• ? None of the examined variables was an independent predictor of the presence of unilateral PCa in the RP specimen (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

• ? Initial PBx24 is not sufficiently accurate to be dependable as a method of predicting tumour laterality in RP specimens. Therefore, the use of PBx24 to guide hemi‐ablation therapy of PCa may lead to mistreatment in a considerable proportion of patients.
• ? Moreover, none of the routinely available clinical and pathological characteristics appears to improve the ability of unilateral PCa on biopsy to predict unilateral PCa in the RP specimen.

     

Does repeat biopsy affect the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy? Analysis by the number of cores taken at initial biopsy

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? To date, studies to evaluate clinical significance of prostate cancer detected on repeat biopsy in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy have yielded inconsistent results. The present study confirms that prostate cancer diagnosed after repeat biopsies is related to better pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy, but not predictive of biochemical recurrence. Additionally, we find that the number of cores taken at initial biopsy do not affect the association between the number of previous biopsies and the prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To determine whether repeat prostate biopsies are associated with more favourable prognoses compared with diagnosis at initial biopsy in patients who undergo radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer and to determine if this association is affected by the number of cores taken at initial biopsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? We reviewed 1147 patients with prostate cancer from 1991 to 2008.
• ? Patients were stratified into two groups by the number of biopsies before diagnosis (initial biopsy vs repeat biopsy: at least two biopsies).
• ? The effects of several variables on pathological outcomes and biochemical recurrence‐free and systemic progression‐free survivals were assessed.

RESULTS

• ? Of the 1147 patients, 1064 (92.8%) were diagnosed with cancer at first biopsy and 83 (7.2%) at repeat biopsy.
• ? Compared with patients diagnosed at initial biopsy, those diagnosed at repeat biopsies were more likely to have a lower clinical stage (cT1c: 79.5% vs 55.5%, P < 0.001) and organ‐confined tumours (78.3% vs 61.3%, P= 0.003), but there was no significant difference in initial biopsy core number (8.3 vs 8.7, P= 0.373).
• ? Five‐year biochemical recurrence‐free and progression‐free survival rates did not show significant differences between the two groups (88.8% vs 82.2%, P= 0.078; 100.0% vs 96.5%, P= 0.105, respectively), and these results were not affected by the number of cores taken at initial biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? Although prostate cancer diagnosed after repeat biopsies was related to better pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy, the number of previous biopsies did not predict disease recurrence.
• ? Moreover, the number of cores taken at initial biopsy did not affect these associations.

     

Local recurrence after tumour enucleation for renal cell carcinoma with no ablation of the tumour bed: results of a prospective single-centre study

Study Type – Therapy (individual cohort)
Level of Evidence 2b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Tumour enucleation was demonstrated to be an oncologically safe conservative treatment for small renal masses in agreement with the EAU guidelines. Nevertheless, the theoretical increased risk of positive surgical margins and local recurrence, led some authors to hypothesize a possible key role of laser or diathermy ablation of the tumour bed to free the kidney parenchyma from any tumour cells that extended in the kidney parenchyma. Our pathological and clinical results showed that tumour enucleation with no ablation of the tumour bed (e.g. diathermy, argon beam or Nd‐YAG laser) can ensure negative surgical margins and it is not associated with an increased risk of local recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To prospectively evaluate the risk of positive surgical margins and local recurrence after blunt tumour enucleation (TE) with no ablation of the tumour bed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Between 2005 and 2007, data were gathered prospectively from 201 consecutive patients who had open TE with no ablation of the tumour bed.
• ? Overall, 164 consecutive patients had TE for single sporadic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
• ? All patients had an abdominal computed tomography (CT) at the last follow‐up visit.

RESULTS

• ? The pathological review showed that 70.2% of tumours were pT1a, 18.9% were pT1b, 1.8% were pT2 and 9.1% were pT3a.
• ? The mean (range, interquartile range) tumour greatest dimension was 3.5 (0.5–12.5, 2.4–4.1) cm.
• ? Although no deliberate attempt to resect normal parenchyma was performed, the pathological analysis showed the presence of a thin layer of parenchyma with a mean (range) thickness of 0.97 (0.31–1.60) mm, around the tumour. None of the patients had positive surgical margins.
• ? At a mean (median, range) follow up of 40 (38, 25–62) months, three (1.8%) patients had local recurrence, of whom one (0.6%) had a true local recurrence at the enucleation site detected 35 months after surgery, while two had kidney recurrence elsewhere associated with concurrent systemic metastases diagnosed 16 and 13 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? TE with no ablation of the tumour bed is a safe technique with a local recurrence rate of 0.6%.
• ? The histopathological analysis showed the presence of a minimal tumour‐free surgical margin, although no deliberate attempt to resect normal parenchyma is performed.

     

The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume

Study Type – Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Due to sampling error, the Gleason score of clinically localized prostate cancer is frequently underestimated at the time of initial biopsy. Given that this may lead to inappropriate surveillance of patients with high‐risk disease, there is considerable interest in identifying predictors of significant undergrading. Recently PSAD has been proposed to be an accurate predictor of subsequent upgrading in patients diagnosed with Gleason 6 disease on biopsy. We examined the predictive characteristics of PSAD in patients with low‐ and intermediate‐risk disease on biopsy subsequently treated with radical prostatectomy. We found that although PSAD was a significant predictor of upgrade of biopsy Gleason 6 and 3 + 4 = 7 tumours, it failed to predict upgrading in patients with Gleason 7 tumours taken as a whole. When we explored reasons for this discrepancy, we found that the amount of PSA produced per unit tumour volume decreased with increasing Gleason score, thereby diminishing the predictive value of PSAD.

OBJECTIVES

• ? To analyse the performance of PSA density (PSAD) as a predictor of Gleason score upgrade in a large cohort stratified by Gleason score.
• ? We and others have shown that an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and final radical prostatectomy (RP) pathology is a significant risk factor for recurrence after local therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Patients undergoing RP with matching biopsy information were identified from two prospective databases.
• ? Patients were analysed according to the concordance between biopsy and final pathology Gleason score in three paired groups: 6/>6, 3 + 4/>3 + 4, 7/>7.
• ? Receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated stratified by Gleason score, and the area under the curve (AUC) calculated.
• ? Logistic regression models were fitted to identify significant predictors of tumour upgrade.

RESULTS

• ? From 1516 patients, 435 (29%) had an upgrade in Gleason score. ROC analysis showed a decline in AUC with increasing biopsy Gleason score, from 0.64 for biopsy Gleason score 6, to 0.57 for Gleason score 7.
• ? In logistic regression models containing pretreatment variables, e.g. clinical stage and number of positive cores, for Gleason score 6 and 3 + 4, PSAD was the strongest predictor of subsequent tumour upgrade (odds ratio [OR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.18–1.83, P= 0.001 and OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.14–1.67, P= 0.002, respectively).
• ? Surprisingly, in tumours upgraded from Gleason score 7 to >7, PSAD was not predictive even on univariable analysis, whereas clinical stage and number of positive cores were significant independent predictors. To explore the relationship between serum PSA and Gleason score, tumour volume was calculated in 669 patients.
• ? There was a strong association between Gleason score and tumour volume, with the median volume of Gleason score 7 and Gleason score >7 tumours being approximately twice and four‐times that of Gleason score 6 tumours, respectively (P < 0.001).
• ? In contrast, the median serum PSA level per millilitre tumour volume decreased significantly with increasing grade, from 5.4 ng/mL for Gleason score 6 to 2.1 ng/mL for >7 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

• ? There is a strong correlation between Gleason score and tumour volume in well/intermediate differentiated tumours, and as they produce relatively high amounts of PSA per unit volume of cancer, high PSAD is the strongest single predictor of tumour undergrading.
• ? However, as higher grade tumours produce less PSA per unit volume, PSAD loses its predictive ability, and other clinical markers of tumour volume such as palpable disease and numbers of positive cores become more predictive.

     

Outcomes in patients with Gleason score 8-10 prostate cancer: relation to preoperative PSA level

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? High‐grade prostate cancers are associated with poor disease‐specific outcomes. A proportion of these tumours produce little PSA. This study demonstrates that among Gleason 8–10 prostate cancers, some of the worst survival outcomes are associated with the lowest PSA levels.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To assess outcomes of patients with Gleason score 8–10 prostate cancer (CaP) with a low (≤2.5 ng/mL) vs higher preoperative serum PSA levels.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? From 1983 to 2003, 5544 patients underwent open radical prostatectomy, of whom 354 had a Gleason 8–10 tumour in the prostatectomy specimen.
• ? Patients were stratified according to preoperative PSA level into four strata: ≤2.5 ng/mL (n= 31), 2.6–4 ng/mL (n= 31), 4.1–10 ng/mL (n= 174), and >10 ng/mL (n= 118).
• ? We compared biochemical progression‐free survival (PFS), metastasis‐free survival (MFS), and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) as a function of preoperative PSA level.

RESULTS

• ? Patients with PSA level ≤2.5 ng/mL were more likely to have seminal vesicle invasion (P= 0.003).
• ? On Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, patients with a PSA level ≤2.5 ng/mL had proportionately worse outcomes than their counterparts with higher PSA levels.
• ? The 7‐year PFS in the PSA ≤2.5 ng/mL stratum was lower than those of the PSA 2.6–4 ng/mL and 4–10 ng/mL strata (36% vs 50 and 42%, respectively); however, the lowest 7‐year PFS was found in those with a PSA level >10 ng/mL (32%, P= 0.02).
• ? Gleason score 8–10 tumours with a PSA level ≤2.5 ng/mL also tended to have the lowest 7‐year MFS (75, 93, 89 and 92% for PSA level ≤2.5, 2.6–4, 4.1–10 and >10 ng/mL, respectively, P= 0.2) and CSS (81, 100, 94 and 90% for PSA level ≤2.5, 2.6–4, 4.1–10 and >10 ng/mL, respectively, P= 0.3), although these differences were not statistically significant.
• ? In the subset with palpable disease, Gleason grade 8–10 disease with PSA level ≤2.5 ng/mL also was associated with a worse prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? In patients with Gleason grade 8–10 disease, a proportion of these tumours are so poorly differentiated that they produce relatively little PSA.
• ? Patients with high‐grade, low‐PSA tumours had less favourable outcomes than many of those with higher PSA levels.

     

Evolution of the clinical presentation of men undergoing radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer

Study Type – Prognosis cohort series (multi‐centre) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Men with high‐risk prostate cancer experience recurrence, metastases and death at a higher rate in the prostate cancer population. This study adds greater than 20‐year data regarding the continued evolution of high‐risk prostate cancer toward high‐Gleason disease as the sole determinant of high‐risk status prior to radical prostatectomy. It validates the accumulation of multiple‐risk factors as a poor prognostic indicator in a radical prostatectomy population and demonstrates long‐term cancer specific outcomes, extending the findings demonstrated by previous publications.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To investigate the outcomes and potential effect of improved longitudinal screening in men presenting with high‐risk (advanced clinical stage [>T2b], Gleason score 8–10 or prostate‐specific antigen [PSA] level >20 ng/mL) prostate cancer (PC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? The Institutional Review Board approved, Institutional Radical Prostatectomy Database (1992–2010) was queried for men with high‐risk PC based on D'Amico criteria.
• ? Year of surgery was divided into two cohorts: the Early PSA Era (EPE, 1992–2000) and the Contemporary PSA Era (CPE, 2001–2010).
• ? PC features and outcomes were evaluated using appropriate comparative tests.

RESULTS

• ? In total, 667 men had high‐risk PC in the EPE and 764 in the CPE.
• ? In the EPE, 598 (89.7%) men presented with one high‐risk feature; 173 (29.0%) men had a Gleason score of 8–10 on biopsy. In the CPE, 717 (93.9%) men presented with one high‐risk feature (P= 0.004) and 494 (68.9%) men had a Gleason score of 8–10.
• ? At 10 years, biochemical‐free survival (BFS) was 44.1% and 36.4% in the EPE and CPE, respectively (P= 0.04); metastases‐free survival (MFS) was 77.1% and 85.1% (P= 0.6); and PC‐specific survival (CSS) was 83.3% and 96.2% (P= 0.5).
• ? BFS, MFS and CSS were worse for men with more than one high‐risk feature in both eras.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? Over the PSA era, an increasing percentage of men with high‐risk PC were categorized by a biopsy Gleason score of 8–10.
• ? The accumulation of multiple high‐risk features increases the risk of biochemical recurrence, the development of metastases and death from PC.
• ? BFS, MFS and CSS are stable over the PSA era for these men. The balance between a greater proportion of men having high Gleason disease and a greater proportion with small, less advanced tumours may explain the stability in MFS and CSS over time.