Intra-oral pattern of tooth and periodontal bone loss between the age of 50 and 60 years. A longitudinal prospective study

OBJECTIVE: In a 10-year prospective study we analyzed (i) the intra-oral pattern of and (ii) potential risk factors for tooth and periodontal bone loss in 50-year-old individuals. METHODS: A randomized subject sample of 50-year-old inhabitants in the County of Varmland, Sweden, was examined at baseline and after 10 years. Data from full-mouth clinical and radiographic examinations and questionnaire surveys of 309 (72%) of the individuals who were dentate at baseline were available for analysis. Non-parametric tests and binary logistic multiple regression models were used for statistical analysis of the data. RESULTS: 4.1% of the 7,101 teeth present at baseline, distributed among 39% of the subjects, were lost during the 10-year interval. The incidence of tooth loss was highest among mandibular molars (7.5%) and lowest among canines (1.8%). The relative risk (RR) for tooth loss for endodontically compromised teeth was 4.1 and for furcation-involved molars 2.4-6.5, depending on tooth position. Logistic regression analysis identified baseline alveolar bone level (ABL), endodontic conditions, CPITN score (Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs), tooth position, caries, and educational level as risk factors for tooth loss. The overall mean 10-year ABL change was -0.54 mm (S.E. 0.01). On a tooth level the ABL change varied between -0.35 mm (mandibular molars) and -0.79 mm (mandibular incisors). Smokers experienced a greater (20-131% depending on tooth type) mean bone loss than non-smokers. The logistic regression model revealed that tooth position, smoking, and probing pocket depth > or =4 mm were risk factors for bone loss of >1 mm. No pertinent differences were observed with respect to risk factors for ABL change in the subgroup of non-smokers compared to the results of the analysis based on the entire subject sample. CONCLUSION: Tooth loss was more common in the molar than in the anterior tooth regions, while periodontal bone loss had a random distribution in the dentition. The predominant risk factors identified with regard to further radiographic bone loss were "probing pocket depth > or =6 mm" and "smoking".     

Intra‐oral pattern of tooth and periodontal bone loss between the age of 50 and 60 years. A longitudinal prospective study

Objective: In a 10‐year prospective study we analyzed (i) the intra‐oral pattern of and (ii) potential risk factors for tooth and periodontal bone loss in 50‐year‐old individuals. Methods: A randomized subject sample of 50‐year‐old inhabitants in the County of Värmland, Sweden, was examined at baseline and after 10 years. Data from full‐mouth clinical and radiographic examinations and questionnaire surveys of 309 (72%) of the individuals who were dentate at baseline were available for analysis. Non‐parametric tests and binary logistic multiple regression models were used for statistical analysis of the data. Results: 4.1% of the 7,101 teeth present at baseline, distributed among 39% of the subjects, were lost during the 10‐year interval. The incidence of tooth loss was highest among mandibular molars (7.5%) and lowest among canines (1.8%). The relative risk (RR) for tooth loss for endodontically compromised teeth was 4.1 and for furcation‐involved molars 2.4–6.5, depending on tooth position. Logistic regression analysis identified baseline alveolar bone level (ABL), endodontic conditions, CPITN score (Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs), tooth position, caries, and educational level as risk factors for tooth loss. The overall mean 10‐year ABL change was ?0.54?mm (S.E. 0.01). On a tooth level the ABL change varied between ?0.35?mm (mandibular molars) and ?0.79?mm (mandibular incisors). Smokers experienced a greater (20–131% depending on tooth type) mean bone loss than non‐smokers. The logistic regression model revealed that tooth position, smoking, and probing pocket depth ≥4?mm were risk factors for bone loss of >1?mm. No pertinent differences were observed with respect to risk factors for ABL change in the subgroup of non‐smokers compared to the results of the analysis based on the entire subject sample. Conclusion: Tooth loss was more common in the molar than in the anterior tooth regions, while periodontal bone loss had a random distribution in the dentition. The predominant risk factors identified with regard to further radiographic bone loss were ‘probing pocket depth ≥6?mm’ and ‘smoking’.     

Long-term effect of smoking on vertical periodontal bone loss

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to investigate the influence of smoking on vertical periodontal bone loss over 10 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study base consisted of a population that was examined on two occasions with a 10-year interval, including 91 individuals, 24 smokers, 24 former smokers, and 43 non-smokers. The assessment of vertical bone loss was based on full sets of intra-oral radiographs from both time points. The severity of vertical bone loss was expressed as the proportion of proximal sites with vertical defects per person. RESULTS: The 10-year increase in the proportion of vertical defects was statistically significant in all groups (p<0.001) and, in addition, significantly associated with smoking (p<0.05). In particular, the difference between smokers and non-smokers was significant (p<0.01) whereas former smokers did not differ from non-smokers. Moreover, the 10-year vertical bone loss was significantly greater in heavy exposure smokers than in light exposure smokers suggesting an exposure-response effect (p<0.01). Compared with non-smokers the unadjusted 10-year relative risk was 2.3-fold increased in light exposure smokers and 5.3-fold increased in heavy exposure smokers (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The present observations indicate a significant long-term influence of smoking on vertical periodontal bone loss, yielding additional evidence that smoking is a risk factor for periodontal bone loss.     

A radiographic survey of periodontal conditions in Greece

Abstract The present study used radiographic assessments to evaluate the pattern of destructive periodontal disease in a rural and an urban sample of 25—64 year old Greek adults. The rural sample (A) comprised 190 subjects and the urban sample (B) 400 subjects. 13% of the subjects in sample A and 8% in sample B were edentulous. Full-mouth intraoral radiographs were obtained from the 503 dentate subjects and were examined with respect to (i) number and type of teeth present, and (ii) alveolar bone level (ABL), i.e., the distance between the cementoenamel junction and the alveolar bone crest at the approximal tooth surfaces. The results revealed that alveolar bone loss was ubiquitous in both samples. Pronounced bone loss, however, (i.e., a subject mean ABL of >6 mm) affected 18% (sample A) and 8% (sample B) of the individuals. Although an ABL of >6 mm was scored at 7.2 sites/subject in sample A and at 4.5 sites/subject in sample B, more than 10 such sites were found in 23% (A) and 11% (B) of the examined subjects. 25%) of the subjects in the rural sample (A) and 12% in the urban sample (B) accounted for 75% of the total number of tooth sites with pronounced bone loss. Multiple regression revealed that age and number of remaining teeth were the parameters most strongly correlated with the amount of bone loss on both the individual subject and the tooth site level. The present findings (i) demonstrated a high prevalence and severity of destructive periodontal disease in these 2 samples, and (ii) confirmed the skewed distribution of advanced disease in the population.     

Risk of severe periodontal disease in a Swedish adult population

Abstract. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for severe periodontal disease progression in a Swedish adult population between the years 1973 and 1988–91. In 1973, a random sample of 474 dentate adults living in Jönko ping County was examined clinically and radiographically. A questionnaire on demographic and socio-economic status, general health, and dental care habits was also used. During the years 1988–1991, 361 of the individuals examined in 1973 were re-examined. A total of 506 (6%) teeth or in average 1.4 teeth per subject were lost between the 2 examinations. 4 subjects had become completely edentulous. The mean loss of teeth in the different age groups 20–60 years was 0.2, 0.9, 1.4, 2.3, and 2.6, respectively. The periodontal bone level decreased by age both in 1973 and in 1988–91. The mean annual progression rate was 0.06 mm for all 357 individuals and varied between 0.04 and 0.07 mm per subject in the different age groups. The presence of periodontal disease progression was defined as bone loss of >20% at a proximal site between the 2 examinations. The most prevalent tooth types with bone loss of >20% at proximal sites were the maxillary and mandibular 2nd molars and the 1st maxillary molar, representing a % of 18.0, 12.8, and 13.5, respectively. The degree of association between severe periodontal disease progression and explanatory variables was investigated using logistic regression models. The dependent variable was no progression of periodontal disease or severe periodontal disease progression, i.e., subjects with periodontal bone loss >20% at ≥6 sites. Age was found to be correlated with severe periodontal disease progression by an odds ratio of 1.05 (CI: 1.02–1.07). The frequency of females in the group with severe bone loss was 58% and higher than in the non-progressing group, 50%. Only 9% in the group with no bone loss smoked as compared to 38% in the group of individuals with severe periodontal bone loss. % supragingival plaque, gingival inflammation, and deepened periodontal pockets (≥4 mm) at baseline were related to severe periodontal disease progression by odds ratios of 1.03 (CI: 1.02–1.05), 1.01 (1.00–1.03), and 1.03 (1.00–1.05), respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression model, age (odds ratio 1.13 (CI: 1.06–1.19)), smoking (odds ratio 20.25 (5.07–80.83)), and % pockets ≥4 mm (odds ratio 1.15 (1.04–1.27)) remained significantly associated with severe disease progression. Furthermore, female gender and differences in income level appeared in the multivariate analysis to be related with severe bone loss, with odds ratios of 3.19 (CI: 1.02–9.97) and 8.46 (CI: 1.97–36.37), respectively.     

Patient-based assessments of clinical periodontal conditions in relation to alveolar bone loss

BACKGROUND: Limited subject-based information exists on the relationship between clinical and radiographic periodontal data. AIMS: To use subject-based data to assess the extent of concurrence between clinical and radiographic information, and to study what clinical information best predicts alveolar bone loss (ABL). Material and Methods: Subject-based data on smoking habits, bleeding on probing, plaque scores, pocket probing depth (PD), and evidence of alveolar BL were obtained, and functional periodontal pentagon risk diagrams (PPRDs) were studied from 168 consecutive subjects attending a medical clinic. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 62.7 years (SD+/-9.0). The average number of teeth was 21.3 (SD+/-8.0) with on average 5.6 molars remaining (SD+/- 3.9). In this subject cohort, 33.1% had never smoked, 44.2% had quit smoking, and 22.7% were currently smokers. Mean plaque and bleeding scores were high or 60.2% (SD+/-24.0) and 53.1% (SD+/-23.6), respectively. PDs >or=6.0 mm were found in 55.9% of the subjects. Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated that tooth loss and proportional plaque scores were the predominant factors included in the equations associated with ABL. Wald coefficients varied between 3.99 and 9.15, and with p-values between 0.05 and 0.01. When included, the PPRD score became the exclusive factor at several cut-off levels (Wald's coefficients between 19.8 and 15.6, p<0.001). Consequently, the best receiver operator curve was identified for the PPRD at the >40% cut-off ABL level (area under the curve: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.74-0.89; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of teeth lost and the proportion of plaque scores provided significant predictive factors for ABL. The functional PPRD demonstrated an exclusive and highly predictable association with ABL. Subject-based proportional data for PDs >4.0 mm provided poor substitute measures for the extent of ABL.     

A 10-year prospective study of tobacco smoking and periodontal health

BACKGROUND: To date only a few studies have evaluated the long-term influence of smoking and smoking cessation on periodontal health. The present study, therefore, was undertaken with the aim to prospectively investigate the influence of smoking exposure over time on the periodontal health condition in a targeted population before and after a follow-up interval of 10 years. METHODS: The primary study base consisted of a population of occupational musicians that was investigated the first time in 1982 and scheduled for reinvestigation in 1992 and 2002. The 1992 investigation included 101 individuals from the baseline study constituting a prospective cohort including 16 smokers, who had continued to smoke throughout the entire length of the 10-year period; 28 former smokers who had ceased smoking an average of approximately 9 years before the commencement of the baseline study; 40 non-smokers, who denied ever having smoked tobacco; and 17 individuals whose smoking pattern changed or for whom incomplete data were available. The clinical and radiographic variables used for the assessment of the periodontal health condition of the individual were frequency of periodontally diseased sites (probing depth > or =4 mm), gingival bleeding (%), and periodontal bone height (%). The oral hygiene standard was evaluated by means of a standard plaque index. RESULTS: The changes over the 10 years with respect to frequency of diseased sites indicated an increased frequency in continuous smokers versus decreased frequencies in former smokers and non-smokers. Controlling for age and frequency of diseased sites at baseline, the 10-year change was significantly associated with smoking (P <0.001). The differences between current smokers and non-smokers, and between current and former smokers, respectively, were statistically significant (P<0.001). Moreover, the 10-year change increased significantly with increasing smoking exposure controlling for age (P= 0.01). In terms of periodontal bone height, the 10-year changes implied statistically significant reductions within current as well as former smokers (P <0.001 and P <0.05, respectively), but not within non-smokers. The overall change was significantly associated with smoking controlling for age and bone height level at baseline (P<0.01), including statistically significant differences between current smokers and non-smokers and between current and former smokers, respectively (P<0.05). Moreover, the 10-year bone height reduction increased significantly with increasing smoking exposure controlling for age (P <0.05). With regard to gingival bleeding, the 10-year differences between smoking groups were not statistically significant. Plaque index remained low throughout in all smoking groups at an overall average level of about 0.8. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that periodontal health is compromised by chronic smoking as evidenced by an increase of periodontally diseased sites concomitant with loss of periodontal bone height, as compared to non-smokers whose periodontal health condition remained unaltered throughout the 10-year period of investigation. The periodontal health condition in former smokers, similar to that of non-smokers, remained stable, suggesting that smoking cessation is beneficial to periodontal health.     

Root proximity as a risk factor for progression of alveolar bone loss: the Veterans Affairs Dental Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present longitudinal study was to evaluate the association between root proximity and the risk for alveolar bone loss (ABL). METHODS: We used data from the Veterans Affairs Dental Longitudinal Study, a closed-panel longitudinal cohort study of 1,231 men enrolled in 1968 with triennial follow-up examinations. Periapical radiographs of mandibular incisors from subjects with > or =10 years of follow-up were selected. Interradicular distance (IRD) at the cemento-enamel junction and alveolar bone levels at baseline and last follow-up were measured using digitized radiographs. The rate of progressive ABL was determined and expressed as millimeters per 10 years. Site-specific multivariate regression models were fit to evaluate the association between IRD and ABL rate, adjusting for age and smoking. Empirical standard errors and generalized estimating equations were used to account for the correlation among sites within subjects. RESULTS: There were 473 dentate subjects, aged 28 to 71 years at baseline, with > or =10 years of follow-up data available for analyses. The mean follow-up time was 23 years. The mean IRD was 1.0 +/- 0.3 mm, and the mean ABL rate during 10 years was 0.61 +/- 0.59 mm. There was a significant non-linear association between IRD and ABL rate (P <0.005). Compared to sites with IRD > or =0.8 mm, sites with IRD <0.6 mm were 28% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11% to 48%) more likely to lose > or =0.5 mm of bone during 10 years (relative risk: 1.28 [95% CI: 1.11 to 1.48]) and 56% (95% CI: 11% to 117%) more likely to lose > or =1.0 mm of bone during 10 years (relative risk: 1.56 [95% CI: 1.11 to 2.17]). CONCLUSIONS: IRD <0.8 mm is a significant local risk factor for alveolar bone loss in mandibular anterior teeth. Measurement of IRD may have important prognostic value in making treatment decisions.     

Tobacco smoking and vertical periodontal bone loss

Cigarette smoking is associated with increased prevalence and severity of destructive periodontal disease in terms of periodontal pocketing, periodontal bone loss, and tooth loss. The smoking destructive effect on periodontal bone may be of even "horizontal" and vertical "angular" pattern. The vertical bone loss or the "vertical defect" is a sign of progressive periodontal breakdown that involves the periodontal bone. Water pipe smoking has a sharp rise by the popularity in the recent years by men and women in Middle East countries. The general objective of this thesis was to investigate the relationship between tobacco smoking and vertical periodontal bone loss cross-sectionally and longitudinally. This thesis is based on two study populations, Swedish musicians and a Saudi Arabian population. All participants had a full set of intra-oral radiographs including 16 periapical and 4 bitewing projections that were assessed with regard to presence or absence of vertical defects. In Study I, the number of defects per person increased with age. Vertical defects were more common in the posterior as compared to the anterior region of the dentition and the distribution of defects within the maxilla as well as the mandible typically revealed a right-left hand side symmetry. Cigarette smoking was significantly associated with the prevalence and severity of vertical bone defects (Studies II and III). The relative risk associated with cigarette smoking was 2 to 3-fold increased. The impact of water pipe smoking was of the same magnitude as that of cigarette smoking and the relative risk associated with water pipe smoking was 6-fold increased compared to non-smoking. In addition, the risk of vertical defects increased with increased exposure in cigarette smokers as well as water pipe smokers (Study III). In Study IV, the proportion of vertical defects increased over a 10-year period and the increase over time was significantly associated with smoking. Moreover, the 10-year vertical bone loss was significantly greater in heavy exposure smokers than in light exposure smokers suggesting an exposure-response effect of smoking. Compared to non-smokers the 10-year relative risk was 2.4-fold increased in light exposure smokers and 5.8-fold increased in heavy exposure smokers. In conclusion, the present observations indicate that there is a significant relationship between tobacco smoking and vertical periodontal bone loss. Tobacco smoking should be considered a risk factor for periodontal vertical bone loss.     

Tobacco smoking and periodontal health in a Saudi Arabian population

BACKGROUND & AIM: Tobacco smoking exerts a harmful effect on the periodontal tissues manifested by periodontal pockets, attachment loss and periodontal bone loss. Current evidences on the effects of tobacco on periodontal health mainly concern cigarette smoking. In view of the increasing popularity of water pipe smoking in Arabian countries and reports confirming that water pipe smoking has health effects similar to those of cigarette smoking, there is a need for a better understanding of the potential harm of this smoking habit. The present thesis was carried out in order to explore whether water pipe smoking is associated with periodontal health in a manner similar to cigarette smoking. MATERIAL & METHODS: Residents in Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia, were invited to participate in the study by means of announcements in two daily newspapers. 355 individuals, 100 women and 255 men (17-60 years) responded to a standardized questionnaire and digital panoramic dental radiographs were taken. The questionnaire included information about oral hygiene practices, dental care and smoking habits. Of these subjects, 262 (73%) also volunteered for clinical examination, including assessments of oral hygiene, gingival inflammation and probing depth. Subgingival microbial test was carried out in 198 individuals for the detection of 12 different bacterial species most commonly associated with periodontal disease using the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique. Participants were stratified into water pipe smokers 33%, cigarette smokers 20%, smokers of both water pipe and cigarettes (mixed smokers 19%) and non-smokers 28%. RESULTS: Tobacco smoking is associated with a suppression of the gingival bleeding response to plaque accumulation. A suppressive effect was observed in both cigarette and water pipe smokers compared to non-smokers (Study I). Both cigarette and water pipe smoking were associated with the presence of more than 10 pockets of > or = 5 mm probing depth. The relative risk for periodontal disease was 5.1-fold and 3.8-fold increased in water pipe and cigarette smokers, respectively, compared to non-smokers (p < 0.01). The relative risk associated with heavy smoking was about 8-fold elevated in water pipe smokers and 5-fold elevated in cigarette smokers, suggesting an exposure-response effect (Study II). Tobacco smoking was associated with a reduction of the periodontal bone height. The reduction was of similar magnitude in water pipe smokers and cigarette smokers. The relative risk of periodontal bone loss of more than 30% of the root length was 3.5-fold and 4.3-fold elevated in water pipe and cigarette smokers, respectively, compared to non-smokers (p < 0.01). The relative risk associated with heavy smoking was 7.5-fold elevated in water pipe smokers and 6.3-fold elevated cigarette smokers (Study III). Further more, cigarette smokers, water pipe smokers and non-smokers exhibited similar periodontal microflora (Study IV). CONCLUSION: Tobacco smoking is associated with inferior periodontal health. The impact of water pipe smoking is of largely the same magnitude as that of cigarette smoking. The association between tobacco smoking and an inferior periodontal health seems to be independent of the subgingival microflora. Water pipe smoking habit should be considered in periodontal health.     

The association of smoking with vertical periodontal bone loss

BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the relation between smoking and vertical periodontal bone loss is scant. The objective of the present study was to investigate the association between smoking and the prevalence and severity of vertical bone defects. METHODS: Full sets of intraoral radiographs of 249 individuals in 1982 and 229 individuals in 1992 both with an age range 21 to 70 years were assessed with regard to presence or absence of vertical bone defects. A vertical defect was defined as a resorption of the interdental marginal bone > or = 2 mm that had a typical angulation towards either the mesial or distal aspect of the root. RESULTS: The prevalence of vertical defects in 1982 was 47% for current smokers, 49% for former smokers, and 24% for non-smokers. In 1992 the prevalence was 42%, 28%, and 19% for current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers, respectively. Both in 1982 and 1992 the prevalence was significantly related to smoking status (chi2 = 14.4 and chi2 = 9.9, P<0.01). Furthermore, the severity of vertical defects was significantly associated with smoking after controlling for age both in 1982 and 1992 (P<0.05). The relative risk associated with current smoking was 2.0-fold increased in 1982 and 3.4-fold increased in 1992 (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The observations suggest that smoking is associated with increased levels of prevalence as well as severity of vertical bone loss. Smoking is considered a potential risk factor for vertical periodontal bone loss.     

FcgammaRIIIb genotypes and smoking in periodontal disease progression among community-dwelling older adults in Japan

BACKGROUND: FcgammaRIIIb genotypes and smoking are risk factors for periodontal disease. However, the interaction of FcgammaRIIIb- NA1-NA2 polymorphism with smoking remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine if FcgammaRIIIb-NA1-NA2 polymorphism and smoking are associated with periodontal disease progression among elderly people. METHODS: Among 70-year-old subjects, 164 with neither diabetes mellitus nor blood sugar > or =140 mg/dl, who had more than 20 teeth and who could participate in both the baseline and the follow-up examinations were included in the study. The NA1 group comprised subjects with FcgammaRIIIb-NA1NA1 genotype (N = 53), while the NA2 group included subjects with FcgammaRIIIb-NA1NA2 or NA2NA2 genotype (N = 111). We examined the progression of periodontitis by measuring attachment loss during 3 years. RESULTS: The frequency of subjects who showed > or =4 mm additional attachment loss at one or more sites was 55.6% for smokers and 37.2% for non-smokers. The odds ratio (OR) was 2.13 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.92 to 4.76). We found a better association between periodontal progression and smoking in the NA2 group. The OR for smokers was 3.03 (CI:1.12 to 8.33, P = 0.028). Additionally, the mean number of sites with > or =4 mm additional attachment loss per person between smokers and non-smokers in the NA2 group or between smokers and non-smokers in the NA1 group was 2.90 3.42 and 0.74 1.53 or 0.57 0.79 and 0.68 1.03, respectively (P <0.001; analysis of variance [ANOVA]). CONCLUSION: Our results may suggest an association between smoking and periodontal disease progression in elderly people with FcgammaRIIIb-NA2 polymorphism.     

Smoking, a weak predictor of periodontitis in older adults

BACKGROUND: The impact of smoking habits on periodontal conditions in older subjects is poorly studied. AIMS: To assess if a history of smoking is associated with chronic periodontitis and medical history in older subjects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The medical and dental history was collected from 1084 subjects 60-75 years of age. Smoking history information was obtained from self-reports. Periodontal variables [clinical probing depth (PD)>/=5.0 mm, clinical attachment levels (CALs) >/=4.0 mm], and radiographic evidence of alveolar bone loss were assessed. RESULTS: 60.5% had never smoked (NS), 32.0% were former smokers (FS) (mean smoke years: 26.1 years, SD+/-13.1), and 7.5% were current smokers (CS) (mean smoke years 38.0 years, (SD+/-12.1). The proportional distribution of CAL >/=4.0 mm differed significantly by smoking status (NS and CS groups) (mean difference: 12.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5-22.6, p<0.02). The Mantel-Haenszel common odds ratio between smoking status (CS+FS) and periodontitis (>20% bone loss) was 1.3 (p<0.09, 95% CI: 0.9-2.0) and changed to 1.8 (p<0.02, 95% CI: 1.3-2.7) with 30 years of smoking as cutoff. A weak correlation between number of years of smoking and CAL>/=4.0 mm was demonstrated (r(2) values 0.05 and 0.07) for FS and CS, respectively. Binary logistic forward (Wald) regression analysis demonstrated that the evidence of carotid calcification, current smoking status, gender (male), and the number of remaining teeth were explanatory to alveolar bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: A clinically significant impact on periodontal conditions may require 30 years of smoking or more. Tooth loss, radiographic evidence of carotid calcification, current smoking status, and male gender can predictably be associated with alveolar bone loss in older subjects.     

Risk of severe periodontal disease in a Swedish adult population

Abstract. In this study, potential risk factors for severe periodontal disease were identified in a cross-sectional sample from the county of Jönköping, Sweden, 547 adults 20–70 years of age were categorised clinically and radiographically by level of periodontal disease experience. These levels were used to divide the sample into groups – individuals without any reduction in periodontal bone level (60%) and those with severe periodontal bone loss (13%) – which were then used in univeriate and multivariate logistic regression analyses as dependent variable. Demographic, socio-economic, general health, smoking habits, clinical, and dental care variables were used in the different regression analyses. In the univariate model, age (20–70 years) was found to be correlated with more severe periodontal disease experience (odds ratio: 1.13; 95% CI; 1.10–1.17). The association with periodontal disease was more pronounced for the older age groups (50, 60, and 70 years), A negative financial situation was also related to severe periodontal bone loss when regressed univariately (odds ratio 2.20 [95%: 1.04–4.68]). Moderate-heavy smoking (3=10 cigarettes/day) appeared to be associated with severe periodontal destruction with an odds ratio of 9.78 (95% CI: 3.62–36.42), Of the clinical variables in the univariate model, higher mean levels of supragingival dental plaque and the presence of subgingival calculus were related to more severe periodontal disease with odds ratios of 1.02 (95%: 1.01–1.03) and 2.96 (95% 1.50–5.88), respectively When the same variables were regressed multivariately, age (continuous) (odds ratio 1.17 [95% CI: 1.12–1.22]). moderate-heavy smoking (odds ratio 11.84 [95% CI: 4.19–33.50]), and higher mean levels of plaque (odds ratio 1.02 [95% CI: 1.00–1.03]) remained significant. Light smoking (1–9 cigarettes/day) was not significantly associated with severe periodontal disease in the 2 regression models. The present study demonstrated that smoking, greater age, and higher mean levels of plaque are potential risk factors for severe periodontal disease in this specific population.     

Cigar, pipe, and cigarette smoking as risk factors for periodontal disease and tooth loss

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to test the hypotheses that cigar and pipe smoking have significant associations with periodontal disease and cigar, pipe, and cigarette smoking is associated with tooth loss. We also investigated whether a history of smoking habits cessation may affect the risk of periodontal disease and tooth loss. METHODS: A group of 705 individuals (21 to 92 years-old) who were among volunteer participants in the ongoing Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging were examined clinically to assess their periodontal status and tooth loss. A structured interview was used to assess the participants' smoking behaviors with regard to cigarettes, cigar, and pipe smoking status. For a given tobacco product, current smokers were defined as individuals who at the time of examination continued to smoke daily. Former heavy smokers were defined as individuals who have smoked daily for 10 or more years and who had quit smoking. Non-smokers included individuals with a previous history of smoking for less than 10 years or no history of smoking. RESULTS: Cigarette and cigar/pipe smokers had a higher prevalence of moderate and severe periodontitis and higher prevalence and extent of attachment loss and gingival recession than non-smokers, suggesting poorer periodontal health in smokers. In addition, smokers had less gingival bleeding and higher number of missing teeth than non-smokers. Current cigarette smokers had the highest prevalence of moderate and severe periodontitis (25.7%) compared to former cigarette smokers (20.2%), and non-smokers (13.1%). The estimated prevalence of moderate and severe periodontitis in current or former cigar/pipe smokers was 17.6%. A similar pattern was seen for other periodontal measurements including the percentages of teeth with > or = 5 mm attachment loss and probing depth, > or = 3 mm gingival recession, and dental calculus. Current, former, and non- cigarette smokers had 5.1, 3.9, and 2.8 missing teeth, respectively. Cigar/pipe smokers had on average 4 missing teeth. Multiple regression analysis also showed that current tobacco smokers may have increased risks of having moderate and severe periodontitis than former smokers. However, smoking behaviors explained only small percentages (<5%) of the variances in the multivariate models. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that cigar and pipe smoking may have similar adverse effects on periodontal health and tooth loss as cigarette smoking. Smoking cessation efforts should be considered as a means of improving periodontal health and reducing tooth loss in heavy smokers of cigarettes, cigars, and pipes with periodontal disease.     

Longitudinal study of predictive factors for periodontal disease and tooth loss

Longitudinal assessment of risk factors for periodontal disease is necessary to provide evidence that a putative risk factor or risk indicator is a true risk factor. The purpose of the present study was to explore longitudinally a variety of markers as possible periodontal risk factors in subjects with little or no periodontal disease at baseline. 415 subjects with mild or little periodontal disease were examined: medical and dental history; socioeconomic profile, clinical measurements, microbial samples and radiographic assessment of bone height were performed at baseline, and at a follow-up examination 2 to 5 years later. Mean probing pocket depth (PPD) at baseline was 1.99+/-0.37 mm while mean overall change was 0.1 mm which amounts to an annual rate of 0.04 mm. Overall mean clinical attachment level (1.75+/-0.6 mm) at baseline resulted in mean attachment change of 0.28 mm (0.12 mm annually). Alveolar crestal height (ACH) at baseline (mean 2.05+/-0.85 mm) resulting in a mean net loss of 0.1 mm. Approximately 10% of all sites presented for the second visit with attachment loss exceeding the threshold (4.4% annually), while only 2.2% of all sites exhibited attachment gain (0.88% annually). Older individuals exhibited greater mean bone loss but the least amount of attachment loss. Current smokers exhibited greater disease progression compared to non-smokers. Tooth morbidity (0.17 teeth/patient/year) was associated with greater baseline CAL and ACH loss, and an assortment of systemic conditions. Subjects who harbored Bacteroides forsythus (Bf) at baseline had greater loss in ACH; likewise, these subjects experienced greater proportions of losing sites and twice as much tooth mortality compared to Bf-negative patients. Baseline clinical parameters correlated strongly with the outcome, i.e., subjects with deeper mean pocket depth at baseline exhibited greater increase in pocket depth overtime; while subjects with greater attachment loss at baseline exhibited greater attachment loss between the 1st and 2nd visits.     

Analysis of periodontal risk profiles in adults with or without a history of myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: An association between periodontitis and cardiovascular diseases has been suggested. AIMS: To study whether a combination of clinical variables in a functional risk diagram enhanced the ability to differentiate between subjects with or without an immediate history of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A functional periodontal pentagon risk diagram (PPRD) with five periodontal risk vectors was created. The surface of individual PPRDs was calculated using data from 88 subjects with recent AMI and 80 matched control subjects with no history of AMI. RESULTS: Age, gender, number of remaining teeth (mean value: 21.1 versus 21.6 teeth), smoking status, and pocket probing depth (PPD) distribution did not differ by group. Gingival recession was greater in control subjects (mean difference: 5.7, SD: +/- 1.9, p<0.01, 95% CI: 1.8-9.6). Bone loss > or = 4.0 mm was at all levels studied was significantly greater in subjects with AMI and bone loss > or = 50% (> or = 4 mm) was the best individual predictor of AMI (beta = 2.99, p < 0.000, 95% CI: 7.5-53.4). Only PPRD scores were associated with AMI status when factors not included in the PPRD were studied (beta = 22.1, SE: 5.9, p < 0.0001, 95% CI: 10.3-33.7). The best association between AMI status and study variables was the combination of > or = 4 mm of bone loss > or = 50%, proportion of bleeding on probing (%BOP), %PPDs > or = 6 mm, and tooth loss (Nagelkirke r2 = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of five periodontal parameters in a PPRD added predictive value, suggesting that comprehensive data should be used in studies of associations between periodontitis and heart diseases. Radiographic evidence of bone loss was the best individual parameter.     

Periodontal disease and coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND: Several epidemiological studies have demonstrated an association between periodontal disease and coronary heart disease (CHD). The association could be a result of confounding by mutual risk factors. The present study was undertaken in a Danish population to reveal the significance of common risk factors. METHODS: The investigation was conducted as a case-control study comprising 250 individuals: 110 individuals with verified CHD from a Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and 140 control individuals without CHD from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Information on diabetic status, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, physical activity, school attendance, household income, body weight and height, triglyceride, and serum cholesterol was obtained. Full-mouth probing depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP), and alveolar bone level (ABL) on radiographs were registered. ABL was stratified into ABL1=ABL2 to 4 mm. Multiple logistic regression models with stepwise backward elimination were used allowing variables with P<0.15 to enter the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The CHD group had a significantly lower outcome with respect to PD, BOP, CAL, and ABL. For participants<60 years old, only risk factors such as smoking and diabetic status entered the multivariate analysis. For the ABL3 group, there was a significant association with CHD for participants<60 years old, the odds ratio being 6.6 (1.69 to 25.6). For participants>or=60 years old, there was no association. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed a positive association between periodontal disease and CHD in agreement with several other studies. The association was highly age dependent and could only be attributed to diabetes and smoking to some extent.     

Periodontal treatment needs assessed by the use of clinical and radiographic criteria

The aim of the present study was to use a decision making model in order to assess the periodontal treatment needs of a random sample of employees in a large Swedish industrial corporation. The model used provided data on critical bone loss limits for different tooth types and ages, beyond which treatment must be initiated, in order to fulfill the goal of maintaining all teeth in a functional state throughout life. A sample comprising 192 subjects belonging to four age strata (31-35 yr, 41-45 yr, 51-55 yr, and 61-65 yr) was involved. From each subject, a full mouth series of intra-oral radiographs were available. The radiographic bone height was assessed at the mesial and distal aspect of all teeth by measuring the distance between the cementoenamel junction and the bone crest. The clinical examination included assessments of plaque, gingivitis, probing pocket depth, and probing attachment level. The results revealed that (i) only 3.1% of all approximal tooth sites exhibited radiographic bone loss exceeding the critical limit, (ii) all individuals and 70% of the approximal tooth sites were in need periodontal treatment when presence of gingival inflammation (bleeding on probing) was employed as the single criterion for therapeutic intervention, (iii) the proportion of individuals and tooth sites requiring treatment amounted to 98% and 27%. respectively, when a probing pocket depth of at least 4 mm was included as an additional criterion, and 54% and 4.1%, respectively, if a probing depth threshold of 6mm was used, while (iv) the use of bleeding on probing in combination with radiographic bone loss beyond the critical limits disclosed a need of treatment in 40% of the subjects and 2.5% of the approximal tooth sites.     

Two-year incidence of tooth loss among South Australians aged 60+ years

Abstract Tooth loss diminishes oral function and quality of life, and national health targets aim to reduce population levels of tooth loss. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine tooth loss incidence and predictors of tooth loss among older adults in South Australia. Methods: Data were obtained from a cohort study of a stratified random sample of community-dwelling dentate people aged 60+ years. Interviews and oral examinations were conducted among 911 individuals at baseline and among 693 of them (76.1%) 2 years later. Incidence rates and relative risks were calculated for population subgroups and multivariate logistic regression was used to construct risk prediction models. A method was developed to calculate 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for relative risks (RR) from logistic regression models using a Taylor series approximation. Results: Some 19.5% (95% CI = 15.4-23.6%) of people lost one or more teeth during the 2 years. Men, people with a recent extraction, people who brushed their teeth infrequently, smokers and people born outside Australia had significantly (P<0.05) greater risk of tooth loss. Baseline clinical predictors of tooth loss included more missing teeth, retained roots, decayed root surfaces, periodontal pockets and periodontal recession. In a multivariate model that controlled for baseline clinical predictors, former smokers (RR = 2.55, 95% C1=1.48-4.40) and current smokers (RR = 2.06, 95% CI=0.92-4.62) had similarly elevated risks of tooth loss compared with non-smokers. Conclusions: The findings from this population suggest that a history of smoking contributes to tooth loss through mechanisms in addition to clinical disease processes alone.