Tramadol versus methadone for treatment of opiate withdrawal: a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of tramadol versus methadone for treatment of opiate withdrawal. Seventy patients randomly were assigned in two groups to receive either prescribed methadone (60 mg/day) or tramadol (600 mg/day). The withdrawal syndrome of patients was evaluated before and after rapid opiate detoxification using the Objective Opioid Withdrawal Scale (OOWS). No significant differences existed in overall OOWS scores between two groups (P = 0.11). Dropout rates were similar in both groups. Side effects in the tramadol group were as or less common than in the methadone group, with the exception of perspiration. Tramadol may be as effective as methadone in the control of withdrawal and could be considered as a potential substitute for methadone to manage opioids withdrawal.     

Efficacy of buspirone in the treatment of opioid withdrawal

In an attempt to develop a new opiate detoxification approach, the authors assessed the efficacy of buspirone in the treatment of acute heroin withdrawal. Buspirone, a drug interacting with the serotonergic system, was selected because there is evidence that a decrease in serotonergic neurotransmission may be involved in opiate withdrawal symptoms. Twenty-nine hospitalized heroin addicts were randomized to 4 groups: (1) placebo; (2) methadone; (3) buspirone 30 mg daily; (4) buspirone 45 mg daily. The double-blind trial started in all patients with a 5-day methadone stabilization period ending with a 30-mg dose. This was followed from days 6 through 12 by placebo in group 1 and by a methadone taper in group 2. Because of its delayed action, buspirone was started on day 1 in groups 3 and 4 and was continued, after methadone discontinuation, through day 12. On day 13, drugs and placebo were discontinued and patients were observed through day 14. Withdrawal symptoms were assessed with the "Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale" (SOWS) and the "Objective Opiate Withdrawal Scale" (OOWS). The SOWS and OOWS scores were significantly higher in the placebo group than in the methadone, buspirone 30 mg, and buspirone 45 mg groups. There were no significant differences in SOWS or OOWS scores when the methadone group was compared with each of the two buspirone groups or when the two buspirone groups were compared with one another. In conclusion, buspirone, a nonopiate drug with no abuse potential, a safe side effect profile and no withdrawal symptoms, at doses of 30 and 45 mg, was as effective as a methadone taper in alleviating the withdrawal symptoms of heroin addicts stabilized for 5 days with, and then withdrawn from, methadone. The use of buspirone could be particularly helpful in outpatient settings where the duration of the methadone taper recommended for detoxification can be lengthy.     

Tramadol versus buprenorphine for the treatment of opiate withdrawal: a retrospective cohort control study

Various drugs have been used for the treatment of opioid withdrawal, e.g., methadone, buprenorphine, and clonidine. Tramadol is a centrally acting synthetic analgesic agent with opiate activity due to low affinity binding of the parent compound and higher affinity binding of the O-demethylated metabolite M1 to mu opioid receptors. As a consequence, there may be a role for the use of tramadol in the treatment of opiate withdrawal. We attempt to assess the efficacy of tramadol in treating moderate heroin withdrawal through a retrospective cohort control study, conducted in a detoxification unit in a community teaching hospital. Out of 100 heroin abusers admitted for detoxification during the review period, 64 patients who were treated either with buprenorphine or tramadol, were included in this study, with 20 participants in the buprenorphine group and 44 in the tramadol group. Both groups were matched for age, sex, and self-reported average quantity of heroin used per day. In the tramadol group, the average CINA maximum was 9.0, and in the buprenorphine group it was 11.2 (P = 0.07). The use of oral clonidine per patient in the tramadol group was 1.6 tablets, and in the buprenorphine group 0.1 tablets (P = 0.002). The length of stay was 3.7 days in the tramadol group and 4.1 days in the buprenorphine group (P = 0.5). Four participants in the tramadol group received three or more doses of buprenorphine because their symptoms were not controlled, and were considered as treatment failures. These preliminary data suggest that tramadol may be comparable to buprenorphine in the management of mild to moderately severe heroin withdrawal. These findings, if reproduced in larger studies with stronger research designs, have potentially great implications for the management of opioid withdrawal in both the inpatient and outpatient setting.     

Opioid detoxification with buprenorphine,clonidine, or methadone in hospitalized heroin-dependent patients with HIV infection

With the growing role of intravenous drug use in the transmission of HIV infection, HIV-infected patients frequently present with comorbid opioid dependence. Yet, few empirical evaluations of the efficacy and consequences of opioid detoxification medications in medically ill HIV-infected patients have been reported. In a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, we evaluated the impact of three medications on the signs and symptoms of withdrawal and on the pain severity in heroin-dependent HIV-infected patients (N=55) hospitalized for medical reasons on an inpatient AIDS service. Patients received a 3-day pharmacologic taper with intramuscular buprenorphine (n=21), oral clonidine (n=16), or oral methadone (n=18), followed by a clonidine transdermal patch on the fourth day. Observed and self-reported measures of opioid withdrawal and pain were taken 1-3 times daily for up to 4 days. Opiate administration used as medically indicated for pain was also recorded. Observer- and subject-rated opiate withdrawal scores decreased significantly following the first dose of medication and overall during treatment. Among all 55 subjects, self-reported and observer-reported pain decreased after treatment (on average observer-rated opioid withdrawal scale (OOWS) scores declined 5.6 units and short opioid withdrawal scale (SOWS) declined 4.8 units, P<0.001, for both) with no indication of increased pain during medication taper. There were no significant differences of pain decline and other measures of withdrawal between the three treatment groups. During the intervention period, supplemental opiates were administered as medically indicated for pain to 45% of the patients; only 34% of men versus 62% of women received morphine (P<0.05). These findings suggest buprenorphine, clonidine, and methadone regimens each decrease opioid withdrawal in medically ill HIV-infected patients.     

Intermittent naloxone attenuates the development of physical dependence on methadone in rhesus monkeys

Rhesus monkeys that received 15 daily injections of methadone (2 mg/kg i.m.) exhibited a characteristic opiate withdrawal syndrome after injection of naloxone (0.5 mg/kg i.m) on the 16th day. In comparison, injection of naloxone (0.5 mg/kg i.m.) once every 2 days during a similar 15 day methadone treatment period in these same monkeys significantly attenuated the severity of the opiate withdrawal syndrome exhibited after naloxone injection on the 16th day. Each naloxone administration during the 15 day methadone treatment period elicited an opiate withdrawal syndrome that did not significantly differ on each of the 7 days it was given and was less severe than the syndrome precipitated by naloxone following 15 days of methadone without intermittent naloxone. The lack of increments in the withdrawal response to the seven naloxone injections during the 15 days of methadone treatment and the attenuation of the withdrawal response to naloxone on day 16 after intermittent naloxone administration during the 15 day methadone treatment period support the hypothesis that naloxone modifies opiate receptor mechanisms so that they revert to an agonist-naive state following antagonist exposure. These findings suggest that various agonist and antagonist drugs opiate combinations or mixed agonist-antagonist drug could be clinically useful in the management of situations where physical dependence on opiates is a problem.     

Coca and Cocaine: A Bibliography

Abstract

Using signs, symptoms and serum methadone levels to guide evaluation, the authors treated 164 patients in a methadone maintenance program with doses of methadone exceeding 100 mg/d. The mean dose of these higher dose (HD) patients was 211 mg/d (range 110–780 mg/d). A comparison group (C) of 101 patients was randomly selected from the general clinic population mean dose 65 mg/d). At intake the HD group reponed $153/day of heroin use versus $87/day in the C group. The HD group had more patients whose opiate of choice was an oral pharmaceutical (30% versus 2% of the C group). Sixty-three percent of the HD group had comorbid Axis I psychiatric diagnoses compared to 32% of the C group. Response to psychopharmacologic treatment was enhanced by increased methadone dose in HD patients with “refractory” psychiatric disorders. Urine toxicologies described as “before” were collected prior to increase over 100 mg/d in the HD group or at the first routine urine toxicology collection of the calendar year for the C group. These results were compared to the most recent urine toxicologies for both groups (“after”). The percentage of toxicologies positive for illicit drugs in the HD group dropped from 87% “before” to 3% “after”. The C group were 54% positive “before” and 37% positive “after”. We conclude that doses of methadone in excess of 100 mg/d (range 110—780 mg/d in our sample of 164 patients) are not only safe but necessary to prevent illicit opiate use, stabilize psychiatric symptoms, and diminish abuse of alcohol and benzodiazepines in many patients.     

A Comparison of Clonidine and Buprenorphine in the Outpatient Treatment of Opiate Withdrawal

The opiate withdrawal syndrome, although not life threatening, is a major obstacle in the treatment of opiate dependence. Over a 12 week period, 124 patients (63% female, 66% African American and mean age 32.6 years) underwent 5 day treatment for opiate withdrawal. Patients treated in the first 6 weeks (n = 69) received clonidine based treatment (0.1 mg every 6 h with one dose received on-site each day and the others taken home), while patients treated in the latter 6 weeks (n = 65) received buprenorphine 0.3 mg IM daily. Both groups received supportive medications for diarrhea, cramps, aches, and nausea, had clonidine patches placed on day 4, and were offered naltrexone upon completion. Based on age, gender, and race the two treatment groups were similar. The completion rate was 75.4% for buprenorphine group and 47.5% for the clonidine group, (p = .001). In conclusion, buprenorphine was superior to clonidine in enabling opiate dependent patients to successfully complete an outpatient detoxification program.     

Effects of ethnicity on low-dose opiate stabilization

In a recent randomized clinical trial using buprenorphine (2 and 6 mg) and methadone (35 and 65 mg), we compared low-level opiate withdrawal symptoms among Whites (n = 84), Hispanics (n = 20), and African Americans (n = 21). During the first 2 monthsof opiate stabilization, persistent low-level opiate withdrawal symptoms were significantly lower in African-Americans and Hispanics than in the white patients. As expected pharmacologically, this relative underreporting of low-level withdrawal by minority patients was greater for the low opiate doses (buprenorphine 2 mg and methadone 35 mg). This underreporting may reflect sociocultural as well as biological differences, because subjective, but not objective, withdrawal symptoms showed this ethnic difference.     

Chlordiazepoxide vs. methadone in opiate withdrawal: a preliminary double blind trial

A double blind trial of chlordiazepoxide vs. methadone in the management of the opiate withdrawal syndrome was conducted in a group of 24 regular heroin takers. Subjective and objective measures including physiological parameters were recorded to compare the severity of opiate withdrawal between the two groups. No significant difference was found in terms of subjective withdrawal distress between the two treatment conditions, although there was a tendency to a return of withdrawal symptoms in the methadone group towards the end of treatment. A nurse rating scale demonstrated a significantly higher level of withdrawal signs in the chlordiazepoxide group on day 3. Physiological measures suggested that neither group experienced a severe withdrawal illness. A similar number in each group (37%) became completely drug free.     

Accelerated lofexidine treatment regimen compared with conventional lofexidine and methadone treatment for in-patient opiate detoxification

This open study compares an accelerated 5-day lofexidine regimen with orthodox 10-day lofexidine and methadone regimens in the treatment of opiate withdrawal in 61 polysubstance abusing opiate addicts. Significant differences in levels of withdrawal symptoms were found on days 11, 13–15 and 17–20, symptoms resolving most rapidly in the 5-day lofexidine treatment group, whilst withdrawal responses in the 10-day lofexidine treatment group were intermediate between the 5-day lofexidine and standard methadone treatment conditions. When the two lofexidine regimens were separately compared with methadone the 5-day lofexidine treatment was significantly more effective on day 10, 11 and 13–20, whilst the 10-day lofexidine treatment was not significantly different from methadone. There were no significant differences in rates of completion of detoxification between the three treatments. Both the lofexidine treatment regimens had a similar effect on blood pressure. Five patients experienced side effects which resolved with dose reduction, all remaining in the study. An accelerated 5-day lofexidine regimen may attenuate opiate withdrawal symptoms more rapidly than conventional 10-day lofexidine or methadone treatment schedules without exacerbating hypotensive side effects.     

Desipramine and contingency management for cocaine and opiate dependence in buprenorphine maintained patients

Co-dependence on opiates and cocaine occurs in about 60% of patients entering methadone treatment and has a poor prognosis. However, we recently found that desipramine (DMI) could be combined with buprenorphine to significantly reduce combined opiate and cocaine use among these dually dependent patients. Furthermore, contingency management (CM) has been quite potent in reducing cocaine abuse during methadone maintenance. To test the efficacy of combining CM with these medications we designed a 12-week, randomized, double blind, four cell trial evaluating DMI (150 mg/day) or placebo plus CM or a non-contingent voucher control in 160 cocaine abusers maintained on buprenorphine (median 16 mg daily). Cocaine-free and combined opiate and cocaine-free urines increased more rapidly over time in those treated with either DMI or CM, and those receiving both interventions had more drug-free urines (50%) than the other three treatment groups (25–29%). Self reported opiate and cocaine use and depressive and opioid withdrawal symptoms showed no differences among the groups and symptom levels did not correlate with urine toxicology results. Lower DMI plasma levels (average 125 ng/ml) were associated with greater cocaine-free urines. DMI and CM had independent and additive effects in facilitating cocaine-free urines in buprenorphine maintained patients. The antidepressant appeared to enhance responsiveness to CM reinforcement.     

Propoxyphene napsylate compared to methadone for opiate dependence

When high single doses of propoxyphene napsylate (PN) were given to patients on a methadone maintenance program, results indicated that, to avoid undesirable side effects, the dose should not exceed 600 mg. However, when PN was given in divided doses (800 mg/day in two equal doses), no significant adverse reactions were noted. In the double-blind comparison of 800 mg PN in two divided doses versus 20 mg methadone, 10 mg methadone, or placebo methadone, it was found that PN (1) did not alleviate withdrawal symptoms in patients previously maintained on 20 mg methadone, (2) produced a slightly overmedicated effect in the detoxified group of ex-methadone patients, and (3) compared favorably to 10 mg methadone in suppressing withdrawal symptoms without producing evidence of overmedication in those patients previously stabilized on a methadone maintenance dose of 10 mg. It is concluded that on a mg for mg basis, PN at a dose of 80-times that of methadone will relieve withdrawal symptoms in the treatment of mildly addicted patients requiring 10 mg methadone or less per day.     

The role of beta-arrestin2 in the severity of antinociceptive tolerance and physical dependence induced by different opioid pain therapeutics

Ligands acting at the same receptor can differentially activate distinct signal transduction pathways, which in turn, can have diverse functional consequences. Further, receptors expressed in different tissues may utilize intracellular signaling proteins in response to a ligand differently as well. The mu opioid receptor (MOR), which mediates many of the pharmacological actions of opiate therapeutics, is also subject to differential signaling in response to diverse agonists. To study the effect of diverse agonists on MOR signaling, we examined the effects of chronic opiate treatment on two distinct physiological endpoints, antinociceptive tolerance and physical dependence, in mice lacking the intracellular regulatory molecule, βarrestin2. While βarrestin2 knockout (βarr2-KO) mice do not become tolerant to the antinociceptive effects of chronic morphine in a hot plate test, tolerance develops to the same degree in both wild type and βarr2-KO mice following chronic infusion with methadone, fentanyl, and oxycodone. Studies here also assess the severity of withdrawal signs precipitated by naloxone following chronic infusions at three different doses of each opiate agonist. While there are no differences in withdrawal responses between genotypes at the highest dose of morphine tested (48 mg/kg/day), the βarr2-KO mice display several less severe withdrawal responses when the infusion dose is lowered (12 or 24 mg/kg/day). Chronic infusion of methadone, fentanyl, and oxycodone all lead to equivalent naloxone-precipitated withdrawal responses in both genotypes at all doses tested. These results lend further evidence that distinct agonists can differentially impact on opioid-mediated responses in vivo in a βarrestin2-dependent manner.     

Assessment of agonist and antagonist effects of tramadol in opioid-dependent humans

The subjective, behavioral, and physiologic effects of racemic tramadol, an analgesic with low abuse liability and dual mu-opioid agonist and monoamine reuptake actions, were evaluated in 2 clinical pharmacology studies in dependent opioid abusers. In the withdrawal precipitation study, participants (N = 8) were maintained on methadone 60 mg/day orally and challenged with intramuscular tramadol, hydromorphone, naloxone, and placebo 20 hr after methadone administration. In the withdrawal suppression study, participants (N = 6) were maintained on hydromorphone given orally 10 mg 4 times daily, and spontaneous opioid withdrawal was produced by withholding doses for 23 hr. During the experimentally induced withdrawal, oral tramadol, hydromorphone, naltrexone, and placebo were given. In both studies a comprehensive panel of participant-rated, observer-rated, and physiologic measures were collected. In both studies, naloxone and naltrexone significantly increased measures of opioid withdrawal, whereas tramadol showed no discernible antagonist effects. In contrast, tramadol's pattern of effects was more similar to that of hydromorphone and suggestive of mild opioid-agonist effects (withdrawal suppression), though not to a statistically significant degree.     

Comparison of buprenorphine and methadone in the treatment of opiate withdrawal: possible advantages of buprenorphine for the treatment of opiate-benzodiazepine codependent patients?

The study is a preliminary investigation to compare the effectiveness of buprenorphine and methadone as opiate detoxification treatments. The sample comprised 123 drug misusers who were dependent upon opiates only or who were codependent upon opiates and benzodiazepines. Drug misusers dependent upon methadone doses up to 70 mg were eligible for the study. Detoxification took place within a specialist inpatient drug-dependence unit. Withdrawal symptom severity was assessed on a daily basis by means of the Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale. Outcome was assessed for reductions in severity of withdrawal symptoms, treatment retention, and treatment completion. Buprenorphine detoxification was associated with less severe opiate withdrawal symptoms than methadone. Opiate/Benzodiazepine codependent patients reported less severe withdrawal symptoms during treatment with buprenorphine than with methadone and were also more likely to complete detoxification when treated with buprenorphine.     

Methadone combined with clonidine versus clonidine alone in opiate detoxification

The availability and use of a methadone/clonidine combination versus clonidine alone in opiate detoxification were studied. In Phase I of the study, a sequential combination of methadone followed by clonidine was utilized in those patients presenting with a primary diagnosis of opiate dependence. During the Phase II of the study, only clonidine was available. Medications were administered only if the history and clinical findings indicated impending or acute opiate withdrawal syndrome. Overall, there was no difference between the Phase I and Phase II groups when the number of opiate dependent admissions, patients completing detoxification, and the patients completing a follow-up rehabilitation program were compared. However, the patients in Phase I whose clinical symptomatology warranted the use of methadone were more likely to complete the detoxification program when compared to the patients in Phase II who received clonidine only. There was no difference between the two groups in completion of a follow-up rehabilitation. Detoxification with clonidine alone was more likely to be successful if the patient has had prior detoxification experience with methadone or if there was a secondary dependence of alcohol, sedative, or tranquilizer present coexisting with the primary opiate dependence diagnosis.     

Buprenorphine and Methadone

Abstract

Buprenorphine and methadone are both effective for the control of the acute signs and symptoms of opiate withdrawal, but it is not known if there are differences between these two medications for other important clinical outcomes. This observational, non-randomized study evaluated completion rates of patients over a 13-month period when buprenorphine replaced methadone as the medication used for short-term inpatient opiate detoxification. Of the 644 patients in the study, the 303 treated with buprenorphine were more likely to complete detoxification than the 341 treated with methadone (vs% 89. 78%; P< .001). Improvement in completion rates coincided with the introduction of buprenorphine. We conclude that as compared to methadone, buprenorphine is associated with greater rates of completion of inpatient detoxification     

The problem of pain: Additive analgesic effect of tramadol and buprenorphine in a patient with opioid use disorder

Background: There is a paucity of published literature on the optimal treatment of pain in patients on buprenorphine treatment (BT) for opioid use disorder. Using this case report, we hope to demonstrate that tramadol may represent an effective treatment option for pain in patients on BT while encouraging future clinical trials. Case: The patient is a 56-year-old Caucasian male with a history of opiate use disorder on treatment with buprenorphine/naloxone 8/2?mg 2 times a day (BID) who was followed in an outpatient general psychiatry clinic that specializes in patients with co-occurring substance use disorders. Although maintaining sobriety from opioids, the patient continued to struggle with acute on chronic pain secondary to osteoarthritis that had left him walking with a cane. The patient was started on tramadol 50?mg 3 times a day (TID) for acute pain by his primary care physician (PCP) while he awaited surgical intervention. He reported analgesic effect with buprenorphine/naloxone but noted that it did not last the full period between his doses. He reported further improvement in his pain along with greater daily functioning with the additional use of tramadol, without side effects or withdrawal symptoms. Discussion: Current recommendations for pain management in patients on BT include discontinuation of BT therapy and/or addition of an adjunctive opioid analgesic (including additional buprenorphine/naloxone) while continuing agonist medication for treatment of opioid use disorder. However, determining which medication to use can be difficult, as there has been no literature examining this issue. In this case, the combination of buprenorphine and tramadol demonstrated an additive analgesic effect. Randomized control studies need to be performed to further understand the changes in pain measurement in patients on BT with tramadol compared with other adjunctive analgesic medications.