Epstein–barr virus associated acute hepatitis with cross‐reacting antibodies to other herpes viruses in immunocompetent patients: Report of two cases

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is the causative agent of infectious mononucleosis (IM) which is characterized by the triad of fever, sore throat, and lymphadenopathy. Self‐limited, mild liver function test abnormalities are seen in IM. Acute hepatitis in primary EBV infection is uncommon. Serum transaminases are elevated but are less than fivefold the normal levels in most cases and rarely exceed 10 times the normal levels in primary EBV infections especially in elderly. Laboratory diagnosis of acute EBV infection is by serological assays confirming the presence of EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgM antibodies. Due to antigenic cross‐reactivity with Herpes viruses, serological assays lack specificity; hence specific molecular diagnostic methods are required for confirmation of the etiology. The present report describes two cases of acute hepatitis caused by infection with EBV which had indistinguishable clinical features and biochemical markers from acute hepatitis caused by hepatotropic viruses such as hepatitis viruses A–E. The diagnosis of infection by EBV was confirmed by detection of EBV DNA in blood of both the patients and EBV DNA in the liver tissue of one of the patients. J. Med. Virol. 85:519–523, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Laboratory diagnosis of viral hepatitis B and C

Accurate diagnosis of viral hepatitis is based on determination of specific viral markers. In HBV infection they include HBsAg, anti-HBs, HBeAg, anti-HBe, anti-HBc, IgM anti-HBc, and HBV DNA. There are patients with HBV marker constellation indicating serologic recovery, but with HBV DNA in the liver indicating continuous viral replication. Mutations have been described in all four HBV genes. It is important to take into account the main precore mutation which leads to a decrease or complete inhibition of HBeAg production (HBeAg negative HBV infection). Diagnostically most important are surface gene mutations because they can result in the false diagnosis or delay in diagnosis in important groups of patients. Anti-HCV and HCV RNA are found in sera of patients with HCV infection. A false positive result is possible with ELISA, especially in patients with low c/o ratio and in all individuals with a low risk of HCV infection. It is necessary to confirm ELISA positivity with confirmation techniques (western blot, immunoblot). There are qualitative and quantitative assays for HCV RNA determination. HCV genotyping should be done, since different viral genotypes respond differently to therapy and therapeutic protocols are different. It is possible to determine HCVAg free or complexed with the antibody. Determination of free HCVAg could enable the diagnosis of acute HCV infection. There are some clinical situations where the interpretation of HBV and HCV markers is difficult because of ambiguous interpretation and "unusual" constellation. Attention should be focused on simultaneous infection within other hepatitis viruses or other viruses like HIV. Replication of one virus could have a direct influence on the replication and expression of another virus.     

Diagnostic accuracy of VIDISCA-NGS in patients with suspected central nervous system infections

ObjectivesConfirming the diagnosis in viral central nervous system (CNS) infections can be difficult with the currently available diagnostic tools. Virus discovery cDNA-amplified fragment length polymorphism next-generation sequencing (VIDISCA-NGS) is a promising viral metagenomic technique that enables the detection of all viruses in a single assay. We performed a retrospective study on the diagnostic accuracy of VIDISCA-NGS in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of individuals with suspected CNS infections.MethodsConsecutive adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department or inpatients, who underwent a lumbar puncture for the suspicion of a CNS infection, were included if they were diagnosed with a viral CNS infection, or if a viral CNS infection was initially suspected but eventually a different diagnosis was made. A quantitative PCR panel of the most common causative viruses was performed on CSF of these patients as reference standard and compared with the results of VIDISCA-NGS, the index test.ResultsWe included 38 individuals with viral CNS infections and 35 presenting with suspected CNS infection for whom an alternative aetiology was finally established. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 52% (95% CI 31%–73%) and 100% (95% CI 91%–100%), respectively. One enterovirus, detected by VIDISCA-NGS, was only identified by quantitative PCR upon retesting. Additional viruses identified by VIDISCA-NGS consisted of GB virus C, human papillomavirus, human mastadenovirus C, Merkel cell polyoma virus and anelloviruses.ConclusionIn patients for whom routine diagnostics do not yield a causative pathogen, VIDISCA-NGS can be of additional value as it can detect a broader range of viruses, but it does not perform well enough to replace quantitativePCR.     

Is there a role for viruses in triggering autoimmune hepatitis?

A role for viruses in autoimmune hepatitis (AH) has been repeatedly proposed but convincing evidence links only two viruses, hepatitis A and Epstein-Barr virus, to the type 1 form of the disease, and only in those rare cases where a genetic predisposition exists and the viral infection occurs at the right time, i.e. when other unknown factors are cooperating. In spite of an impressive amount of information conclusively showing molecular mimicry between cytochrome P450IID6 (the target autoantigen of autoantibodies characteristic of AH type 2) sequences and viral (hepatitis C virus, herpes simplex virus 1, cytomegalovirus, human T lymphotropic viruses 1 and 2) or bacterial (Salmonella typhimurium) antigens, no infectious agent is clearly able to induce this second form of the disease. In conclusion, the molecular mimicry theory has so far found little clinical evidence in its support and many more clinical observations are needed in order to unreveal possible links between viruses and AH.     

Is GB virus C alias "hepatitis" G virus involved in human pathology?]

GB virus-C alias "hepatitis" virus G was discovered in 1995 as a putative causative virus of non A-E hepatitis. It is a very common virus found in 1 to 5% of eligible blood donors in developed countries. Numerous studies over seven years led to the exclusion of its role as a significant etiological agent of hepatitis. Its in vivo replication site is still unknown. Its direct involvement in the induction of significant hepatic or extra-hepatic diseases could not be demonstrated. However, coinfections with other viruses may contribute to changes in the evolution of both liver disease (negatively) and HIV/AIDS (favourably). Today, no country has decided to screen GBV-C in blood donors. However, more studies are necessary before the absence of influence of GBV-C infection on human health in the context of other viral infections could be confirmed definitely. This article is a review of the literature on a possible involvement of GBV-C in pathologies whether associated or not to other infections.     

Replicative homeostasis: a mechanism of viral persistence

Acute viral infection is characterised by high-level replication before prompt decline of viraemia and, commonly, viral clearance. This kinetic pattern is generally held to be due to immune control. However, infection with some viruses, notably hepatitis C (HCV), hepatitis B (HBV) and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), often results in chronic stable low-level spontaneously fluctuating viraemia, kinetics that are difficult to rationalize on this basis. The persistence of HCV, an RNA virus, is especially problematic and its stability, occurring despite rapid, genomic mutation is highly paradoxical. This paper outlines the hypothesis, and evidence, that viruses autoregulate replication and mutation and describes a mechanism--replicative homeostasis--explaining viral stability. Replicative homeostasis results in stable, but reactive, replicative equilibria that drive quasispecies expansion and immune escape and explain all observed viral behaviours and host responses. This paradigm implies new approaches to antiviral therapy and is broadly relevant to modulation of gene expression.     

Retrospective analysis of non-A-E hepatitis: possible role of hepatitis B and C virus infection

In an effort to determine the cause of non-A-E hepatitis, a retrospective study was undertaken on a group of patients with hepatitis but without serological infection markers of hepatitis viruses A-E. A total of 60 patients admitted to Beijing Ditan Hospital during the period of September 1997 and September 1999 were chosen for this study. These patients were diagnosed as either acute or chronic hepatitis, but no serological markers of hepatitis viruses A-E were detected. Since TT virus (TTV), human parvovirus B19 (B19), SEN virus (SENV), and GB virus C/HGV were reported to be associated with hepatitis, attempts were made to detect the presence of these viruses in the sera of patients with non-A-E hepatitis by a nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR) method. Also, more sensitive nPCR and RT-nPCR methods were used to determine HBV DNA and HCV RNA in these patients. Results derived from these analyses demonstrate that HBV DNA was detected in most of these patients (47/60, 78.3%), suggesting that HBV infection played a major role in occult non-A-E hepatitis and detection of HBV DNA by more sensitive PCR methods such as nPCR should be considered for diagnosis of HBV infection. In addition, HCV RNA was detected in three (5%) of these patients. However, GBV-C (HGV) RNA was not detected, and TTV, B19, and SENV appear not to be associated with non-A-E hepatitis, as the prevalence rates of these viruses in patients with non-A-E hepatitis were similar to those in patients with viral hepatitis A-E. The results from this study indicate that co-infection of TTV or B19 with HBV did not increase the severity of the disease.     

Prevalence of parenterally transmitted hepatitis viruses in clinically diagnosed cases of hepatitis

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the most important causative agent of blood borne hepatitis in humans. Hepatitis D Virus (HDV) infection occurs either as a coinfection or superinfection in HBV carriers. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the major cause of transfusion non-A, non-B hepatitis and continues to be a major cause of human liver disease throughout the world. The present study was conducted on 70 clinically diagnosed cases of viral hepatitis to study the prevalence of parenterally transmitted viral hepatitis. The serum samples were tested for HBsAg, HBeAg, IgM anti-HBc, anti-HBe, anti-HCV and anti-HDV using separate ELISA kits. Of the 70 serum samples tested, 28 (40%) were positive for HBsAg out of which 3 (4.28%) were positive for HBeAg also. Five (7.1%) of the HBsAg positive cases tested positive for IgM anti-HBc also. HBsAg alone was found in 17 (24.28%) cases. The prevalence of anti-HCV was 3 (4.28%) in 70 cases. Thus early screening of clinically diagnosed cases of viral hepatitis is essential for establishing diagnosis and treatment to prevent long term sequelae.     

Concise review: Anemia caused by viruses

Most of the viruses known to be associated with anemia in human tend to persistently infect their host and are noncytopathic or poorly cytopathic for blood cell progenitors. Infections with Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, varicella-zoster virus, human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6), B19 parvovirus, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis A and C viruses and the putative viral agent associated with non-A-G post-hepatitis aplastic anemia have been reported in association with anemia. Nevertheless, a direct cytotoxic effect on erythroid progenitors has been clearly demonstrated only for human parvovirus B19 and evocated for HHV-6. A major role for destructive immunity is strongly suspected in the pathogenesis of anemia associated with the other viral infections. Host genes play a role in the occurrence of virus-induced anemia in animal models, and there are some evidences that genetic background could also influence the occurrence of virus-associated anemia in human.     

Polymerase chain reaction as a diagnostic adjunct in herpesvirus infections of the nervous system

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a powerful technique that allows detection of minute quantities of DNA or RNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), vesicle and endoneurial fluids, blood, fresh-frozen, and even formalin-fixed tissues. Various infectious agents can be detected with high specificity and sensitivity, including bacteria, parasites, rickettsia and viruses. PCR analysis of CSF has revolutionized the diagnosis of nervous system viral infections, particularly those caused by human herpesviruses (HHV), and has now replaced brain biopsy as the gold standard for diagnosis of herpes simplex virus (HSV) encephalitis. PCR analysis of both CSF and nervous system tissues has also broadened our understanding of the spectrum of disease caused by HSV-1 and -2, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), varicella zoster virus (VZV), and HHV-6. Nonetheless, positive tissue PCR results must be interpreted cautiously, especially in cases that lack corroborating clinical and neuropathologic evidence of infection. Moreover, positive PCR results from tissues do not distinguish latent from productive (lytic) viral infections. In several neurological diseases, negative PCR results have provided strong evidence against a role for herpesviruses as the causative agents. This review focuses on the use of PCR tests to diagnose HSV and VZV infections of the nervous system.     

Effect of immune modulation on TT virus (TTV) and TTV-like-mini-virus (TLMV) viremia

The present study was designed to investigate how two chronically replicating viruses, TT virus (TTV) and TTV-like mini virus (TLMV), interact with host defence systems. Successive serum samples from three groups of subjects, undergoing modifications of their antiviral defence, were tested by real-time PCR to measure changes in viral titers, and by sequence analyses to indicate whether increases in viremia could be attributed to infection with an unfamiliar strain: 1) in patients receiving immunosuppressants subsequent to kidney transplantation, viral titers tended to increase; 2) in soldiers undergoing extreme training known to cause immunosuppression, insignificant increases in titers were observed; and 3) interferon treatment of patients with hepatitis C virus caused a temporary decrease in TTV and TLMV titers. Increases in viremia were associated only occasionally with the appearance of novel strains. The above results add to knowledge on how these viruses are influenced by the host.     

Acute hepatitis E virus infection in Taiwan 2002–2006 revisited: PCR shows frequent co‐infection with multiple hepatitis viruses

Sporadic cases of acute hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection with production of anti‐HEV IgM have been reported occasionally in Taiwan despite no reported outbreaks in the past. This study was undertaken to determine whether serological markers correlated with virus detection. From 2002 to 2006, 72 reported cases of acute hepatitis E seropositive for anti‐HEV IgM in Taiwan were enrolled for investigation. Acute phase serum samples were collected for detection of HEV RNA, HBV DNA, HCV RNA, and GBV‐C RNA by PCR. The results showed that viral sequences of HEV, HBV, HCV and GBV‐C were detected in 54 (75%), 21 (29.2%), 9 (12.5%), and 22 (30.6%) of cases, respectively. Acute hepatitis A co‐infection was excluded in all patients because none were seropositive for anti‐HAV IgM and, nine patients (12.5%) did not seroconvert to anti‐HEV IgG. These results suggest that serum markers did not correlate completely with viremia in the diagnosis of acute HEV infection. Multiple viruses may co‐infect with acute hepatitis E virus in Taiwan. Detection of hepatitis E viremia together with seropositivity for anti‐HEV IgM and followed by seroconversion to anti‐HEV IgG should be included in the diagnostic criteria for HEV infection. J. Med. Virol. 81:1734–1742, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Compatibility of Tat and Rev transactivators in the primate lentiviruses

Summary Primate immunodeficiency viruses carry a unique set of transacting regulator genes, which are essential for viral replication. The exchangeability of these Tat and Rev transactivators derived from viruses of the four major subgroups identified to date was assessed in transient transfection and infection assay systems. The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), a major causative virus of human AIDS, efficiently activated the other viruses. In contrast, thetat andrev gene products of HIV-2, SIV_AGM (virus of the African green monkey), and SIV_MND (virus of the mandrill) did not fully transactivate the HIV-1. In particular, therev of HIV-1 was not substantially replaced by those of the other viruses. The result that HIV-1 is distinct from the other immunodeficiency viruses with respect to the compatibility of two transactivators gives a firm functional basis for the unique phylogenetic position of HIV-1.     

Entry of hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus is selectively inhibited by carbohydrate-binding agents but not by polyanions

We studied the antiviral activity of carbohydrate-binding agents (CBAs), including several plant lectins and the non-peptidic small-molecular-weight antibiotic pradimicin A (PRM-A). These agents efficiently prevented hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection of target cells by inhibiting the viral entry. CBAs were also shown to prevent HIV and HCV capture by DC-SIGN-expressing cells. Surprisingly, infection by other enveloped viruses such as herpes simplex viruses, respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza-3 virus was not inhibited by these agents pointing to a high degree of specificity. Mannan reversed the antiviral activity of CBAs, confirming their association with viral envelope-associated glycans. In contrast, polyanions such as dextran sulfate-5000 and sulfated polyvinylalcohol inhibited HIV entry but were devoid of any activity against HCV infection, indicating that they act through a different mechanism. CBAs could be considered as prime drug leads for the treatment of chronic viral infections such as HCV by preventing viral entry into target cells. They may represent an attractive new option for therapy of HCV/HIV coinfections. CBAs may also have the potential to prevent HCV/HIV transmission.     

Mutliple hepatitis viruses in multiple attacks of acute viral hepatitis.

We evaluated the causes of 30 episodes of acute viral hepatitis in 13 patients who had multiple attacks. Two (seven per cent) of 30 bouts were caused by hepatitis A virus, and 12 (40%) by hepatitis B virus. No patient, however, had more than one attack with the serologic characteristics of Type A or Type B disease. Thus, there were 16 bouts (53 per cent) not attributable to either of the two recognized hepatitis viruses. None of these "non-A, non-B" episodes, evaluated for infectious mononucleosis and cytomegalovirus infection, could be ascribed to either. From this evidence, therefore, it appears that the clinical syndrome of viral hepatitis is produced not only by the two viruses (hepatitis A virus and hepatitis B virus) recognized since the 1940's but also, in all probability, by two non-A, non-B agents.     

Hepatitis E virus coinfection with hepatotropic viruses in Egyptian children

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Major hepatotropic viruses continue to be important causes of acute viral hepatitis in developing countries. This work was carried out to detect the seroprevalence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) markers in children with acute viral hepatitis due to hepatotropic viruses (A, B and C) and non-A, non-B, non-C acute hepatitis, and to ascertain the influence of HEV superinfection in individuals infected with hepatitis viruses (A, B and C). METHODS: We studied prospectively 162 children with sporadic acute hepatitis who reported to our hospital. Thirteen healthy controls were also included in the study. Laboratory investigations were performed, including complete liver function tests. Complete serological profiles for hepatitis viruses A, B, C and E were evaluated. RESULTS: HEV immunoglobulin G was detected with highest percentage among patients with hepatitis B (56.7%), followed by patients with hepatitis C virus (52.0%), hepatitis A virus (34.1%) and combined hepatitis B and C viruses (30.0%). The detection rate among patients with non-A, non-B, non-C hepatitis was 7.1%. HEV immunoglobulin M was found in 4.5% of hepatitis A virus patients and in 3.3% of hepatitis B patients. The prevalence of HEV immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M correlated with the levels of hepatic aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase in patients with dual markers of infection with hepatitis E and other viruses compared to patients with acute hepatitis due to A and C viruses. CONCLUSIONS: HEV serological markers are common among children with acute viral hepatitis, especially from hepatitis C and B viruses. There may be increased sensitivity to HEV coinfection in association with hepatitis B and C infections. Dual infection with HEV and other hepatotropic viruses was associated with greater elevation of aspartate and alanine aminotransferases.     

Severe hepatitis caused by Epstein-Barr virus without infection of hepatocytes

Although hepatitis is a common feature of primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, severe liver injury is rare and its pathogenesis is unclear. A previously healthy girl developed severe hepatitis with prolonged jaundice. Serologic examination showed that she had primary infection with EBV. An extremely high Epstein-Barr viral load was observed in her peripheral blood. The viral load decreased in parallel with symptomatic improvement. Histologic examinations showed spotty necrosis of the liver parenchyma and infiltration by CD8(+) T cells. The CD8(+) T cells, not hepatocytes, were positive for EBV. Possible mechanisms of viral hepatitis without infection of hepatocytes are discussed.     

Clinical examinations based on nucleic acids of hepatitis viruses

Viral hepatitis is the most common cause of acute and chronic hepatitis. The term, viral hepatitis, generally refers to infections resulting from one of the hepatotrophic viruses: hepatitis A, B, C, D and E. As hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) mainly cause chronic hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma, early diagnosis, prevention and viral elimination are necessary. Eight genotypes of HBV have been detected by sequence divergence of >8% in the entire HBV genome, and designated by capital letters from A to H in the order of documentation. They have distinct geographical distribution and influence the severity of liver disease as well as the response to antiviral therapies. Similarly, HCV has at least six genotypes, of which HCV-1 and -2 are the major genotypes worldwide. Only interferon therapy can eradicate HCV at present, and the sustained virological response depends on HCV genotypes and viral loads. Here, we summarize examinations based on viral nucleic acids and the clinical manifestations of HBV and HCV genotypes.     

Mitochondria in the biology,pathogenesis, and treatment of hepatitis virus infections

Hepatitis virus infections affect a large proportion of the global population. The host responds rapidly to viral infection by orchestrating a variety of cellular machineries, in particular, the mitochondrial compartment. Mitochondria actively regulate viral infections through modulation of the cellular innate immunity and reprogramming of metabolism. In turn, hepatitis viruses are able to modulate the morphodynamics and functions of mitochondria, but the mode of actions are distinct with respect to different types of hepatitis viruses. The resulting mutual interactions between viruses and mitochondria partially explain the clinical presentation of viral hepatitis, influence the response to antiviral treatment, and offer rational avenues for novel therapy. In this review, we aim to consider in depth the multifaceted interactions of mitochondria with hepatitis virus infections and emphasize the implications for understanding pathogenesis and advancing therapeutic development.     

Recent advances in the detection of respiratory virus infection in humans

Respiratory tract viral infection caused by viruses or bacteria is one of the most common diseases in human worldwide, while those caused by emerging viruses, such as the novel coronavirus, 2019-nCoV that caused the pneumonia outbreak in Wuhan, China most recently, have posed great threats to global public health. Identification of the causative viral pathogens of respiratory tract viral infections is important to select an appropriate treatment, save people's lives, stop the epidemics, and avoid unnecessary use of antibiotics. Conventional diagnostic tests, such as the assays for rapid detection of antiviral antibodies or viral antigens, are widely used in many clinical laboratories. With the development of modern technologies, new diagnostic strategies, including multiplex nucleic acid amplification and microarray-based assays, are emerging. This review summarizes currently available and novel emerging diagnostic methods for the detection of common respiratory viruses, such as influenza virus, human respiratory syncytial virus, coronavirus, human adenovirus, and human rhinovirus. Multiplex assays for simultaneous detection of multiple respiratory viruses are also described. It is anticipated that such data will assist researchers and clinicians to develop appropriate diagnostic strategies for timely and effective detection of respiratory virus infections.