Kinetics and expression patterns of chemokine receptors in human CD4+ T lymphocytes primed by myeloid or plasmacytoid dendritic cells

We investigated the kinetics of expression of 12 chemoattractant receptors as a function of cell division following priming of human naive CD4+ T cells by different populations of dendritic cells (DC) and under conditions favoring Th1 or Th2 differentiation. Two chemokine receptors, CXCR3 and CXCR5, were rapidly up-regulated following T cell activation by either monocyte-derived DC, myeloid DC (mDC) or plasmacytoid DC (pDC). While CXCR5 expression was transient, expression of CXCR3 at advanced cell divisions was dependent on differentiation, being expressed at high levels on Th1 cells. Several other receptors (CCR2, CCR3, CCR4, CCR5, CXCR6 and CRTh2) were acquired progressively as a function of cell division and in a fashion that was influenced by polarizing cytokines. The Th2-associated chemoattractant receptors CRTh2 and CCR3 were up-regulated with slower kinetics compared to the Th1-associated receptors CXCR3 and CXCR6, consistent with a different kinetics and efficiency of polarization. Moreover, CCR4 and CXCR6 were preferentially induced in T cells activated by mDC and pDC, respectively. Finally, CXCR5 and CCR7 were also rapidly and transiently up-regulated in memory T cells following TCR stimulation. These results indicate a complex chemokine receptor regulation dependent on both T cell activation and differentiation state. In addition, they reveal the existence of DC-specific cues for the regulation of T cell migratory capacity.     

Assessment of chemokine receptor expression by human Th1 and Th2 cells in vitro and in vivo.

The preferential association of some chemokine receptors with human Th1 or Th2 cells has recently been reported. In this study, the expression of CCR3, CCR5, CXCR3, and CXCR4 were analyzed by flow cytometry in three distinct in vitro models of Th1/Th2 polarization, activated naive and memory T cells, and T-cell clones, in which the intracellular synthesis of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) and the surface expression of CD30 and LAG-3 were also assessed. Moreover, by using immunohistochemistry the in vivo expression of CCR3, CCR5, CXCR3, and CXCR4 was examined in the gut of patients suffering from Crohn's disease, a Th1-dominated disorder, and in the skin of patients suffering from systemic sclerosis, a Th2-dominated disorder. CCR5 and LAG-3 exhibited the same pathway of Th1 association, whereas CXCR3 did not discriminate between Th1- and Th2-dominated responses. On the other hand, CCR3 was found only occasionally in a small proportion of allergen-specific memory T cells with Th2/ThO profile of cytokine production in vitro. However, it was neither seen in Th2-polarized activated naive T cells nor in established Th2 clones and could be detected in vivo only on non-T cells. Finally, whereas CXCR4 expression was not limited to Th2 cells in vivo, it was markedly up-regulated by IL-4 and down-regulated by IFN-gamma in vitro. Thus, the results of this study confirm the existence of flexible programs of chemokine receptor expression during the development of Th1 and Th2 cells. However, caution is advised in interpreting these receptors as surrogate markers of a given type of effector response.     

Functional and phenotypic analysis of human memory CD8+ T cells expressing CXCR3

Several chemokine receptors play an important role in the migration of na?ve, memory, and effector T cells. Flow cytometric analyses showed that human CD8+ T cells with na?ve (CD27+ CD28+ CD45RA+) or memory (CD27+ CD28+/- CD45RA+) phenotypes included a population expressing a high level of CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3high) and one expressing a low level of it (CXCR3low), but those with the effector phenotype (CD27- CD28- CD45RA+/-) included a population that did not express CXCR3 (CXCR3-) and a CXCR3low population. This relation between the expression level of CXCR3 and memory/effector phenotypes also applied to Epstein-Barr virus- or human cytomegalovirus-specific CD8+ T cells. CXCR3high cells were found predominantly in CC chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7)+ CCR5- and CCR7- CCR5- subsets of CD8+ T cells with the CD27+ CD28+ CD45RA- memory phenotype, suggesting that they are memory cells with intermediate differentiation. Indeed, CXCR3high CD27+ CD28+ CD45RA- CD8+ T cells had the ability to produce interleukin-2 and interferon-gamma. These results together indicate that the expression of CXCR3 is up-regulated on intermediately differentiated memory CD8+ T cells. CXCR3high CD8+ T cells had a greater ability to migrate in response to CXCR3 ligands than CXCR3low ones. As CXCR3high memory CD8+ T cells do not express CCR5, high expression of CXCR3 on these memory CD8+ T cells might play an important role in the migration of these cells to inflammatory sites and in their differentiation.     

Induction of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 on TCR-stimulated T cells: dependence on the release from persistent TCR-triggering and requirement for IFN-gamma stimulation

The chemokine receptor CXCR3 has been shown to play a key role in the recruitment of T cells to sites of inflammation such as allografts. Here, we investigated which signals and conditions areresponsible for CXCR3 induction. CXCR3 was induced on T cells that were stimulated with anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 monoclonal antibodies and then recultured without any external stimuli. CXCR3 expression was inhibited when TCR stimulation was persistent in the reculture. CXCR3 induction also depended on the stimulation with IFN-gamma because CXCR3 expression was not induced in IFN-gamma-deficient T cells. The induction of another Th1 chemokine receptor CCR5 absolutely required IL-12 stimulation and STAT4 involvement. In contrast, CXCR3 was induced on STAT4-deficient T cells independently of IL-12 stimulation as long as IFN-gamma was produced as a result of potent TCR stimulation. These results show that CXCR3 induction on TCR-triggered T cells requires the release of these T cells from persistent TCR signaling and the stimulation with IFN-gamma and also indicate the differential regulatory mechanisms underlying the induction of two Th1 chemokine receptors.     

Differential expression of the chemokine receptors by the Th1- and Th2-type effector populations within circulating CD4+ T cells

The in vitro studies have proposed that human Th1 cells favor expression of CXCR3 or CCR5, whereas Th2 cells favor CCR3 and CCR4. In this study, the in vivo relevance of expression of these chemokine receptors on Th cells was investigated in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) as the Th2-dominated disorder and nonatopic normal individuals. Flow-cytometric analysis using monoclonal antibodies against CXCR3, CCR5, CCR3, and CCR4 disclosed that a substantial proportion of memory (CD45RO+) CD4+ T cells in the blood of AD and normal patients expressed CXCR3, CCR5, or CCR4, but expression of CCR3 on these cells was negligible. Stimulation studies combined with intracellular cytokine staining revealed that the cells capable of producing Th2 cytokines, such as interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5, and IL-13, were restricted to the CCR4-expressing population within memory CD4+ T cells. Concerning Th1 cytokine production, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma)-producing cells resided exclusively in CXCR3-expressing memory CD4+ T cells, although IFN-gamma production was found in both memory CD4+ T cells with and without CCR5 expression. We observed that CCR4-expressing memory CD4+ T cells in the blood were more increased in AD patients as compared with normal patients, whereas CXCR3-expressing memory CD4+ T cells were present in a lower frequency in AD than seen in normal patients. These results suggest that CXCR3 and CCR4, but not CCR5 or CCR3, appear to serve as the useful markers for identification of circulating Th1 and Th2 effector populations.     

Selective recruitment of CXCR3+ and CCR5+ CCR4+ T cells into synovial tissue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The inflamed synovial tissue (ST) of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by the selective accumulation of interferon gamma-producing Th1-type CD4+ T cells. In this study, we investigated whether the predominance of Th1-type CD4+ cells in the ST lesion is mediated by their selective recruitment through Th1 cell-associated chemokine receptors CXCR3 and CCR5. The lymphocyte aggregates in the ST of RA contained a large number of CD4+ T cells, which mostly expressed both CXCR3 and CCR5, but not CCR4. In contrast, the frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing CXCR3 and CCR5 in the blood were significantly decreased in RA patients, compared with healthy controls (HC), although there was no difference in the frequencies of CCR4-expressing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells between RA and HC. CXCR3, CCR5, and CCR4 expression in blood CD4 + T cells and CXCR3 expression in CD8+ T cells were increased after interleukin-15 (IL-15) stimulation. Therefore, the distribution of Th1-type CD4+ T cells into the ST from the blood in RA may be associated with the local expression of chemokines, both CXCR3 and CCR5 ligands, and IL-15 may play a role in enhancing these chemokine receptors on CD4+ T cell infiltrates.     

A critical role for IL-12 in CCR5 induction on T cell receptor-triggered mouse CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells

Despite increasing evidence for the role of the chemokine system in leukocyte trafficking, the mechanism underlying the induction of chemokine receptors is poorly understood. Here, we investigated how CCR5, a chemokine receptor implicated in T cell migration to inflammatory sites, is induced in the T cell. CCR5 mRNA was hardly detected in resting T cells and marginally induced following T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation. However, TCR-triggered T cells expressed IL-12 receptor, and stimulation with recombinant IL-12 resulted in high levels of CCR5 expression on both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. In contrast, IL-2 failed to up-regulate CCR5 expression. The effect of IL-12 was selective to CCR5 because IL-12 did not up-regulate CXCR3 expression. Surface expression of CCR5 was shown by staining with anti-CCR5 monoclonal antibody. Stimulation of these CCR5-positive T cells with the relevant chemokine MIP-1 alpha elicited Ca(2+) influx, showing that IL-12-induced CCR5 is functional. These results indicate a critical role for IL-12 in the induction of CCR5 on TCR-triggered T cells.     

Rapid and coordinated switch in chemokine receptor expression during dendritic cell maturation

Dendritic cells (DC) migrate into inflamed peripheral tissues where they capture antigens and, following maturation, to lymph nodes where they stimulate T cells. To gain insight into this process we compared chemokine receptor expression in immature and mature DC. Immature DC expressed CCR1, CCR2, CCR5 and CXCR1 and responded to their respective ligands, which are chemokines produced at inflammatory sites. Following stimulation with LPS or TNF-α maturing DC expressed high levels of CCR7 mRNA and acquired responsiveness to the CCR7 ligand EBI1 ligand chemokine (ELC), a chemokine produced in lymphoid organs. Maturation also resulted in up-regulation of CXCR4 and down-regulation of CXCR1 mRNA, while CCR1 and CCR5 mRNA were only marginally affected for up to 40 h. However, CCR1 and CCR5 were lost from the cell surface within 3 h, due to receptor down-regulation mediated by chemokines produced by maturing DC. A complete down-regulation of CCR1 and CCR5 mRNA was observed only after stimulation with CD40 ligand of DC induced to mature by LPS treatment. These different patterns of chemokine receptors are consistent with “inflammatory” and “primary response” phases of DC function.     

Lack of correlation between chemokine receptor and T(h)1/T(h)2 cytokine expression by individual memory T cells

Chemokine and chemokine receptor interactions may have important roles in leukocyte migration to specific immune reaction sites. Recently, it has been reported that CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR) 3 and CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 5 were preferentially expressed on T(h)1 cells, and CCR3 and CCR4 were preferentially expressed on T(h)2 cells. To investigate chemokine receptor expression by T(h) subsets in vivo, we analyzed cytokine (IL-2, IL-4 and IFN-gamma) and chemokine receptor (CXCR3, CXCR4, CCR3, CCR4 and CCR5) mRNA expression by individual peripheral CD4(+) memory T cells after short-term stimulation, employing a single-cell RT-PCR method. This ex vivo analysis shows that the frequencies of cells expressing chemokine receptor mRNA were not significantly different between T(h)1 and T(h)2 cells in normal peripheral blood. To assess a potential role of in vivo stimulation, we also analyzed unstimulated rheumatoid arthritis synovial CD4(+) memory T cells. CXCR3, CXCR4, CCR3 and CCR5 expression was detected by individual synovial T cells, but the frequencies of chemokine receptor mRNA were not clearly different between T(h)1 and non-T(h)1 cells defined by expression of IFN-gamma or lymphotoxin-alpha mRNA in all RA patients. These data suggest that chemokine receptor expression does not identify individual memory T cells producing T(h)-defining cytokines and therefore chemokine receptor expression cannot be a marker for T(h)1 or T(h)2 cells in vivo.     

Phenotypic and functional analysis of T cells homing into the CSF of subjects with inflammatory diseases of the CNS

The recruitment of lymphocytes across the blood brain barrier (BBB) is mediated by adhesion molecules and chemokines. The expression of activation markers and of chemokine receptors on T cells homing to the nervous system (NS) may help define their functional state. In the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of subjects with inflammatory neurological diseases (IND), including multiple sclerosis, we observed an increased number of T cells coexpressing CXCR3 and CCR5 as well as T cells with a CD45RO+ CCR7+ CD27+ memory phenotype. A subset of CCR7+ T cells coexpressed CXCR3 and CCR5. We also detected an increased number of interferon-gamma-producing T cells in the CSF compared with peripheral blood, mostly but not exclusively in the CD45RO+ CCR7- CD27- compartment. T helper 1 (Th1) clones, established from the CSF of individuals with IND and from a healthy subject, similarly migrated to CXCL10, CXCL12, and CCL5. CXCL10, CXCL12, and CCL19 were increased in the CSF of individuals with neuroinflammation. These findings suggest that CSF is enriched in Th1-polarized memory T cells capable of differentiating into effector cells upon antigen encounter. These cells are recruited into the CSF by inducible chemokines. Thus, CSF represents a transitional station for T cells trafficking to and from the NS.     

Down-regulation of CXCR4 expression on human CD8+ T cells during peripheral differentiation

Multi-color flow cytometric analysis on human CD8(+) T cell subsets revealed that CXCR4 is predominantly expressed on CD8(+) T cells with the naive CD27(+)CD28(+)CD45RA(+) phenotype, and is down-regulated during differentiation into those with an effector phenotype. The down-regulation of CXCR4 expression during peripheral differentiation was supported by the fact that the expression of CXCR4 on CD8(+) T cells was negatively correlated with that of perforin. The analysis of CCR5, CCR7, and CXCR4 co-expression further showed that CD8(+) T cells expressing a high level of CXCR4 are CCR7(+)CCR5(-) naive or central memory subsets, and those expressing a low level of CXCR4 were included in the CCR7(-)CCR5(+/-) memory/effector and effector subsets. Epstein Barr virus-specific CD8(+) T cells, which mostly express the memory phenotype, expressed CXCR4, while human cytomegalovirus-specific CD8(+) T cells, which mostly express the effector phenotype, partially expressed this receptor, showing that the expression of CXCR4 is also down-regulated during differentiation of viral antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells. The classification of human CD8(+) T cells based on the expression of these chemokine receptors should prove useful for studies that clarify the differentiation of human CD8(+) T cells.     

Differential expression of chemokine receptors on human IgA+ and IgG+ B cells

Organ-specific lymphocyte homing is dependent on the expression of tissue-specific homing receptors and selected chemokine receptors. During the effector phase of an immune response, IgA and IgG antibody-secreting cells (ASC) are differently distributed in the body. Still, B cell expression of L-selectin and the mucosal homing receptor integrin alpha4beta7 is not related to the isotype produced, but only to the site of antigen encounter. In this study, we examined if differences in chemokine responsiveness between IgA+ and IgG+ B cells could explain their different tissue localization. Circulating CD19+ B cells were isolated and their expression of IgA, IgG, and selected chemokine receptors was determined by flow cytometry. Few Ig+ cells expressed CCR2, CCR3, or CCR9, and there was no difference in the expression of these receptors between IgA+ and IgG+ cells. In contrast, CCR4, CCR5, and CXCR3 was expressed on significantly more IgG+ than IgA+ cells. The function of chemokine receptors on memory B cells and ASC was then tested in the transwell system. IgG+ memory cells migrated to a higher extent than IgA+ cells towards the CXCR3 ligand CXCL11/I-TAC, while there was only a small migration towards the CCR4 ligand CCL17/TARC and the CCR9 ligand CCL25/TECK. ASC migrated poorly to all chemokines tested. In conclusion, this study shows that IgG+ and IgA+ memory B cells have a differential expression of the Th1 associated chemokine receptor CXCR3, as well as of CCR4 and CCR5. In contrast, none of the studied chemokine receptors was preferentially expressed by IgA+ cells.     

Association of antigen specificity and migratory capacity of memory T cells in rheumatoid arthritis

Among the T cell pool of multiple specificities in the rheumatoid synovial tissues (ST) we have previously shown a lack of proliferative response of T cells to Acanthamoeba polyphaga [1]. In contrast, peripheral blood (PB) derived T cells proliferate to the antigen. The aim of the present study was to establish whether there is a preferential migration of some T cell specificities to the joint in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients dependent on the chemokine system, and to identify which chemokine receptors are involved in the migratory process. For this purpose, PB-derived T cell lines and clones from RA patients specific for A. polyphaga, herpes simplex virus (HSV) and Campylobacter jejuni were developed. Their migratory capacities towards ST-derived chemokine supernatants were analysed. Expression of CCR1, CCR2, CCR5, CCR6, CCR7, CXCR3 and CXCR4 were analysed by FACS, and attracting chemokines were identified by blocking studies. We found that the migratory capacities of T cells specific for C. jejuni and HSV were markedly higher against synovial chemokines than T cells specific for A. polyphaga. CCR5 and CXCR3 were expressed by all high-migrating T cell lines and clones. CCR2 was expressed at higher levels on the high-migrating T cell lines compared with the low-migrating A. polyphaga lines. Neutralization of RANTES (regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted) in the ST cell-derived supernatant reduced T cell migration of all T cell lines and clones by 60-90%, while neutralization of MCP-1 reduced the migratory capacity of CCR2-expressing T cells by 45-80%. In conclusion, the ability of T cells to migrate towards chemokines produced by ST cells is associated with the T cell specificity. Blocking of single chemokines substantially reduced the migratory capacity of memory T cells to ST cell-derived supernatant indicating unique roles for each chemokine receptor in the process of T cell migration.     

Restricted replication of primary HIV-1 isolates using both CCR5 and CXCR4 in Th2 but not in Th1 CD4(+) T cells

We have previously reported that CCR5-dependent human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1; R5), but not CXCR4-restricted (X4) virus, efficiently replicates in T helper cell type 1 (Th1), Th2, or Th0 polyclonal T cells obtained from human umbilical cord blood (CB lines). The X4 virus restriction was env-dependent but did not occur at the level of viral entry. Here, we describe that in contrast to these monotropic HIVs, primary HIV-1 isolates capable of using CCR5 or CXCR4 indifferently for entry (i.e., R5X4 viruses) efficiently replicated in Th2 but not in Th1 CB lines. Although Th1 cells secreted significantly higher amounts of the three CCR5-binding chemokines in comparison with Th2 cells, this restriction was not explained by a defective infection of Th1 cells. Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) down-regulated CCR5 in Th1 cells and inhibited, whereas interleukin-4 (IL-4) up-regulated CXCR4 and enhanced the spreading of R5 and R5X4 viruses in polarized CB lines. However, both cytokines did not rescue the replication of X4 and dualtropic viruses in both types of CB lines or in Th1 cells, respectively, whereas addition of anti-IL-4- or anti-IFN-gamma-neutralizing antibodies did not activate virus expression. These findings together suggest the existence of post-entry restriction pathways influenced by gp120 Env/chemokine coreceptor interaction that may significantly contribute to the superior capacity of R5 and R5X4 HIV-1 strains to spread in vivo in comparison to X4 monotropic viruses.     

Switch in Chemokine Receptor Phenotype on Memory T Cells without a Change in the Cytokine Phenotype

Th1 and Th2 cells as defined by their cytokine profile are associated with the expression of the chemokine receptors CCR5 and CCR3, respectively. In committed human memory Th1 cells the cytokine profile is irreversibly expressed. However, it is not known if the chemokine receptor phenotypes of Th1 and Th2 cells are permanently associated to the cytokine profile or if it can be changed. To analyze the possibility of inducing a switch in chemokine receptor phenotype on memory Th cells we used differentiated memory Th cells isolated from synovial tissue (ST) samples of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Freshly isolated T cells, T-cell lines and T-cell clones from these tissues were manipulated with Th1 (interleukin (IL)-12 + anti IL-4) or Th2 (IL-4 + anti IL-12) inducing conditions. The surface expression of CCR5 and CCR3 was analyzed by flowcytometry and interferon (IFN)-gamma and IL-4 production by ELISA. A Th1-inducing cytokine environment increased the expression of CCR5 in Th1 cells and induced the expression of CCR5 in Th2 cells as compared to culture condition with only IL-2. Induction of CCR5 expression on Th2 clones was associated with secretion of some IFN-gamma. Moreover, the Th2-associated chemokine receptor CCR3 could be expressed on both Th1-dominant cell lines, and clones of Th1 and Th0 type after culture conditions with IL-4. This expression of CCR3 was associated with a reduced IFN-gamma production, but no IL-4 production could be induced. The IL-4-treated Th1 clones had a reduced migratory capacity against chemokines produced by ST cells compared to nonmanipulated T-cell clones. In contrast, the same IL-12-treated Th1 clones showed an increased migratory potential. Induction of the Th2-associated marker CCR3 on memory Th1 cells demonstrates that a change in chemokine receptor phenotype related to the Th2 type can be induced on terminally differentiated Th1 cells, without a change in the cytokine profile.     

体外扩增γδ T细胞的肿瘤组织趋向性

 摘要 目的 旨在考察体外扩增的γδ T细胞向结直肠癌细胞迁移的能力。方法 采用密度梯度离心法分离外周血单个核细胞（Peripheral blood mononuclear cells,PBMCs）,并利用固相化抗T细胞受体（T cell receptor,TCR）γδ抗体进行两周的体外扩增。对扩增的γδ T进行免疫荧光染色和流式细胞仪分析或流式细胞仪分选。采用Bioplex 200流体芯片系统分析细胞因子和趋化因子的表达情况。采用transwell小室进行趋化试验。结果 体外扩增的γδ T细胞主要表达CCR5和CXCR3两种趋化因子受体。四种结直肠癌细胞系和十种结直肠癌肿瘤组织中存在CCR5和CXCR3配体的表达。体外扩增的γδ T细胞在TCR激活的情况下可以大量产生Th1和Th2型细胞因子,进一步募集γδ T细胞。特别是其产生的干扰素γ（Interferon γ,IFN-γ）能够提高结直肠癌细胞CXCR3配体的表达量,从而进一步促进γδ T细胞的趋近。结论 我们的研究结果为γδ T细胞过继免疫治疗结直肠癌提供了重要指征。