Alternatives to unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation in cardiopulmonary bypass

Despite the progress made in the development of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) equipment, systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin and post-bypass neutralization with protamine are still used in most perfusion procedures. However, there are a number of situations where unfractionated heparin, protamine or both cannot be used for various reasons. Intolerance of protamine can be addressed with extracorporeal heparin removal devices, perfusion with (no) low systemic heparinization and, to some degree, by perfusion with alternative anticoagulants. Various alternative anticoagulation regimens have been used in cases of intolerance to unfractionated heparin, including extreme hemodilution, low molecular weight heparins, danaparoid, ancrod, r-hirudin, abciximab, tirofiban, argatroban and others. In the presence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thrombosis, the use of r-hirudin appears to be an acceptable solution which has been well studied. The main issue with r-hirudin is the difficulty in monitoring its activity during CPB, despite the fact that ecarin coagulation time assessment is now available. A more recent approach is based on selective blockage of platelet aggregation by means of monoclonal antibodies directed to GPIIb/IIIa receptors (abciximab) or the use of a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor (tirofiban). An 80% blockage of the GPIIb/IIIa receptors and suppression of platelet aggregation to less than 20% allows the giving of unfractionated heparin and running CPB in a standard fashion despite HIT and thrombosis. Likewise, at the end of the procedure, unfractionated heparin is neutralized with protamine as usual and donor platelets are transfused if necessary. GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors are frequently used in interventional cardiology and, therefore, are available in most hospitals.     

Anticoagulation with prostaglandins during extracorporeal circulation

This paper reviews pathophysiological processes occurring after contact of blood with artificial surfaces and the predominant role of platelets in the genesis of extracorporeal thrombosis. Bleeding complications are common during conventional heparin anticoagulation, and both clinical and experimental evidence suggests that the efficacy of heparin as an anticoagulant is compromised by its relative ineffectiveness towards platelets. Consequently, drugs that inhibit interaction between platelets and artificial membranes have been introduced as an alternative anticoagulant strategy. This paper reviews studies on the use of short-acting antiplatelet prostaglandins such as prostacyclin and prostaglandin E1 alone or in combination with heparin during various forms of extracorporeal circulation such as cardiopulmonary bypass, haemodialysis, continuous haemofiltration, membrane oxygenation, ventricular assist devices, and haemoperfusion. Temporary paralysis of platelet function with antiplatelet prostaglandins has been effective in controlling platelet-surface interaction and reducing bleeding complications and morbidity during and after extracorporeal circulation. By inhibiting the formation of fibrin, leukocyte and platelet-based microaggregates and cytoprotective actions, prostaglandins have been shown to prevent renal, neurologic, and pulmonary dysfunction after extracorporeal circulation. Prostaglandins were most effective in increasing the biocompatibility of extracorporeal systems when they were administered as a supplement to but not as a substitute for heparin. The use of prostaglandins alone should be reserved for patients who are resistant to heparin or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.     

Low-molecular-weight heparin in outpatient treatment of DVT

Patients with a diagnosis of acute deep venous thrombosis have traditionally been hospitalized and treated with unfractionated heparin followed by oral anticoagulation therapy. Several clinical trials have shown that low-molecular-weight heparin is at least as safe and effective as unfractionated heparin in the treatment of uncomplicated deep venous thrombosis. The use of low-molecular-weight heparin in an outpatient program for the management of deep venous thrombosis provides a treatment alternative to hospitalization in selected patients. Use of low-molecular-weight heparin on an outpatient basis requires coordination of care, laboratory monitoring, and patient education and participation in treatment. Overlapping the initiation of warfarin permits long-term anticoagulation. Advantages include a decreased incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and fewer episodes of bleeding complications. Future clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of complicated deep venous thrombosis will further define appropriate indications for use and strategies for outpatient management.     

Plasma exchange for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients on extracorporeal circuits: A challenging case and a survey of the field

Current management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) involves prompt discontinuation of all heparin products and concomitant initiation of a direct thrombin or anti-Xa inhibitor for anticoagulation. In the setting of HIT complicated by an urgent need for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), the safety and the efficacy of short-term heparin-based anticoagulation after therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) have been previously demonstrated. Patients with HIT requiring TPE are frequently on extracorporeal circuits (either CPB, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO] or external ventricular assist devices [VADs]). Performing TPE in parallel with these circuits involves additional consideration for circuit size, anticoagulant/citrate management, as well as flow rates, and risk of air embolus. We report a case of a patient with HIT on external biventricular assist device (BiVAD) requiring urgent CPB who experienced thrombotic and hemolytic complications related to anticoagulation management around apheresis line placement for TPE. We also present results from a national survey of academic apheresis services regarding specific practices in managing patients with HIT on extracorporeal circuits who require TPE. In addition, we demonstrate the utility of TPE in patients with HIT on extracorporeal circuits and the risks of this procedure and the need to develop practice guidelines.     

Use of plasma exchange in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a report of two cases and a review of the literature

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is characterized by thrombocytopenia and potentially serious thromboses, may develop in patients exposed to heparin anticoagulation. HIT is caused by antibodies to the heparin/platelet factor 4 (PF4) complex. Management of HIT involves discontinuation of heparin and anticoagulation with a nonheparin alternative such as a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI). This poses a challenge in the management of patients who need to undergo cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (CPB), because CPB requires anticoagulation with heparin and standardized protocols for use of DTIs are not widely available. We report two patients with HIT who underwent successful CPB with heparin anticoagulation following plasma exchange (PE) to reduce heparin/PF4 antibody titers. Case 1 is a 46-year-old male with cardiac amyloidosis who needed urgent placement of a left ventricular assist device. Case 2 is a 34-year-old woman with acute myocarditis who needed placement of a biventricular assist device. Both patients had positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay assays for heparin/PF4 antibodies and clinical evidence of HIT before PE. Following PE and subsequent CPB, neither patient had clinical or laboratory evidence of HIT. The literature regarding the use of PE for the treatment of complications of HIT and as prophylaxis before CPB is reviewed.     

Diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin use is ubiquitous, wherein 1 to 5% of patients exposed to standard unfractionated heparin develop thrombocytopenia due to antibodies to a complex of heparin and platelet factor 4. Classic features include onset of thrombocytopenia after 5 to 10 days of ongoing heparin exposure, a 50% fall in the platelet count from baseline, resolution of the thrombocytopenia 5 to 10 days after cessation of heparin and a high risk of thrombosis noted in 30 to 75% of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in terms of every-other-day platelet-count monitoring in patients on standard unfractionated heparin. And those patients developing thrombocytopenia necessitate an accurate, readily accessible diagnostic test for HIT. Diagnosis has been recently facilitated by the development of an enzyme-linked immunsorbent assay (ELISA) test for the heparin–P4 antibody complex, although this test carries a relatively low specificity. Widespread use of the ELISA demonstrates a relatively high prevalence of the antibody in patients exposed to heparin in certain settings, such as cardiopulmonary bypass, wherein a quarter of patients have a positive ELISA of unclear significance. Once HIT is diagnosed, the high risk of thrombosis necessitates empiric anticoagulation with an antithrombin such as argatroban or lepirudin, or the heparinoid danaparoid. Additional agents under further study include the antithrombin bivalirudin and the pentasaccharide fondaparinux. Future issues in HIT include increasing awareness for HIT, improving the specificity of HIT testing and the development of new anticoagulants for HIT that will enable out-patient management.     

Anticoagulation in CRRT: agents and strategies in Australian ICUs.

BACKGROUND: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) should ideally operate with as little interruption as possible. The majority of circuit terminations occur due to clotting. The Longevity of CRRT is able to be improved when the extracorporeal circuit is anticoagulated. AIMS: This article willt focus attention on anticoagulant agents used in Australian intensive care units (ICU) to prevent clotting in the CRRT circuit. DISCUSSION: Anticoagulants reviewed include unfractionated or standard heparin, regional heparinisation, low-molecular weight heparins and heparinoids, regional citrate, platelet-inhibiting agents (prostacyclin), thrombin antagonists (recombinant hirudin) and therapy with no anticoagulant use. Each type of anticoagulant was reviewed for mode of action, the method of delivery and how the effect is monitored. Circuit life and the incidence of bleeding were considered as the principle end points in selecting therapy, as well as side-effects with administration such as metabolic disturbances, contraindications to use including allergy and ease of use in the clinical environment. CONCLUSION: No approach to anticoagulation has yet been reported to be as successful in extending circuit life, whilst remaining inexpensive, easy to manage and easy to reverse, as unfractionated heparin. Certain patient conditions may preclude the use of heparin, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT); then heparinoids, thrombin antagonists and sodium citrate are suggested as alternatives. Regional citrate reduces haemorrhagic complications in patients who have coagulation disorders or are at risk of bleeding. Clinical experience with various agents and strategies should also influence choice. The option of no anticoagulant may be appropriate in selected patients rather than more expensive and less familiar drugs.     

Diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin use is ubiquitous, wherein 1 to 5% of patients exposed to standard unfractionated heparin develop thrombocytopenia due to antibodies to a complex of heparin and platelet factor 4. Classic features include onset of thrombocytopenia after 5 to 10 days of ongoing heparin exposure, a 50% fall in the platelet count from baseline, resolution of the thrombocytopenia 5 to 10 days after cessation of heparin and a high risk of thrombosis noted in 30 to 75% of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in terms of every-other-day platelet-count monitoring in patients on standard unfractionated heparin. And those patients developing thrombocytopenia necessitate an accurate, readily accessible diagnostic test for HIT. Diagnosis has been recently facilitated by the development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test for the heparin-P4 antibody complex, although this test carries a relatively low specificity. Widespread use of the ELISA demonstrates a relatively high prevalence of the antibody in patients exposed to heparin in certain settings, such as cardiopulmonary bypass, wherein a quarter of patients have a positive ELISA of unclear significance. Once HIT is diagnosed, the high risk of thrombosis necessitates empiric anticoagulation with an antithrombin such as argatroban or lepirudin, or the heparinoid danaparoid. Additional agents under further study include the antithrombin bivalirudin and the pentasaccharide fondaparinux. Future issues in HIT include increasing awareness for HIT, improving the specificity of HIT testing and the development of new anticoagulants for HIT that will enable out-patient management.     

Direct thrombin inhibition during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Patients with or at risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at particular risk of thrombosis due to the prothrombotic nature of HIT and the endovascular disruption from PCI. Patients require aggressive anticoagulation during PCI, and alternative, nonheparin anticoagulation is recommended over heparin in patients with acute or previous HIT. Argatroban, bivalirudin, and lepirudin are nonheparin, fast-acting, parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs). Multicenter, prospective studies have demonstrated that argatroban and lepirudin each reduce thrombosis in HIT and that argatroban and bivalirudin each provide adequate anticoagulation during PCI in patients with or at risk of HIT. We review current therapeutic practices with direct thrombin inhibitors in patients with or at risk of HIT during PCI, including individuals requiring periprocedural anticoagulation, and the factors influencing the choice of DTI in this setting.     

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia complicating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: Review of the literature and alternative anticoagulants

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life‐threatening prothrombotic, immune‐mediated complication of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin therapy. HIT is characterized by moderate thrombocytopenia 5‐10 days after initial heparin exposure, detection of platelet‐activating anti‐platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies and an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a form of mechanical circulatory support used in critically ill patients with respiratory or cardiac failure. Systemic anticoagulation is used to alleviate the thrombotic complications that may occur when blood is exposed to artificial surfaces within the ECMO circuit. Therefore, when HIT complicates patients on ECMO support, it is associated with a high thrombotic morbidity and mortality. The risk for HIT correlates with the accumulative dosage of heparin exposure. In ECMO patients receiving continuous infusion of heparin for circuit patency, the risk for HIT is not neglected and must be thought of in the differential diagnosis of the appropriate clinical and laboratory circumstances. The following article reviews the current knowledge in HIT complicating ECMO patients and the alternative anticoagulation options in the presence of HIT.     

Anticoagulation and Iloprost for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a case report.

In patients who receive heparin for anticoagulation, there can be a mild, transient thrombocytopenia which is usually devoid of complications. However, 6% of these patients experience serious heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which can result in coagulation problems or death. Iloprost, a recently developed drug, given in conjunction with heparin, can be used to manage the patient with HIT. Two cases reported are of patients diagnosed with HIT and their management with Iloprost.     

肝素诱导的血小板减少症的临床研究

目的 观察应用肝素治疗患者肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)发病情况,探索血小板计数监测HIT的可行性及HIT抗体检测对HIT诊断的意义.方法 对在血管外科应用普通肝素(UFH)治疗的145例患者进行临床观察,于应用UFH治疗前及治疗后进行血小板计数、HIT抗体ELISA检测及肝素诱导的血小板聚集试验(HIPA)等实验室检测.结果 145例患者中血小板减少40例(27.6%),HIT抗体阳性59例(40.7%),HIPA阳性26例(17.9%),诊断HIT 24例(16.5%),其中发生HIT并血栓形成综合征(HITTS)5例(发病率3.4%,占HIT患者的20.8%).多数HIT患者(15例,62.5%)血小板减少与HIT抗体阳性、HIPA阳性同时发生.24例HIT患者的血小板计数均在停用UFH后3～6 d恢复到正常或达到用UFH前水平.结论 通过动态监测血小板计数、联合HIT抗体ELISA法检测及HIPA,可以早期诊断HIT,及时停用UFH,换用抗凝剂,HITTS的发生率有望进一步下降,减少致残、死亡的发生.

Abstract：

Objective To observe the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in patients received unfractionated heparin ( UFH ) treatment, and explore the feasibility of monitoring HIT by platelet counts, as well as the significance of HIT-antibody test in HIT diagnosis. Methods 145 patients received UFH treatment in Vascular Surgery Department were studied. Before and after the UFH treatment,platelet counts, HIT-antibody ELISA test and heparin-induced platelet aggregation (HIPA) were tested.Results Among the 145 patients, thrombocytopenia occurred in 40 ( 27.6% ) cases, HIT-antibody ELISA test positive in 59(40.7% ) cases, HIPA test positive in 26( 17.9% ) cases. The HIT was diagnosed in 24 (16.5%) cases, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (HITTS) occurred in 5( 3.4% in all cases, and 20.8% in HIT patients). In HIT patients, 15 patients (62.5%) were thrombocytopenia, HITantibody positive and HIPA test positive. Platelet counts in all of the 24 patients recovered to normal or level before UFH treatment in 3 -6 days after heparin withdrawal therapy. Conclusion HIT can be early diagnosed by monitoring platelet counts, HIT-antibody ELISA test and HIPA test. Withdrawal of heparin therapy in time and use of alternative anticoagulant, HITTS rate might be expected to decline further.     

Clinical efficacy of heparin fractions: issues and answers

The recent development of heparin fractions and fragments for clinical use has created the prospect of some new agents at our disposal for the treatment of thrombotic disorders. The development of a drug that will block thrombosis but will not impair hemostasis now appears to be a possibility. Due to lack of understanding of all of the mechanisms of the pathology of thrombosis, we are not certain what the properties of the ideal anticoagulant should be. Of the heparins and heparin fractions, fragments, and heparinoids now available to us, we have yet to fully understand the mechanism of their pharmacologic activity. It has been amply demonstrated that decreasing the average molecular weight decreases the antithrombin activity while retaining the anti-Xa activity of heparin derivatives. Studies on animal models have proven the antithrombotic potency of some of these low molecular weight heparins to be equal to that of unfractionated heparin. There has been some evidence that these fractions are less likely than unfractionated heparin to cause hemorrhage in animal models as well as in at least one human clinical trial. A recently published human clinical trial revealed an unexpected incidence of hemorrhage following major surgery when a certain heparin fraction was given as prophylaxis against thrombosis. We are desperately in need of heparin derivatives, heparinoids or other anticoagulants that can be used in place of standard heparin in patients who are allergic to heparin or who have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Patients with these problems not infrequently require cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in which the use of heparin has been mandatory. There is now evidence from animal and human studies that such a procedure is possible with a heparin fraction or a heparinoid. This is true for hemodialysis as well. Studies in progress offer hope that a low molecular weight fragment with potent anti-Xa activity will not cause thrombocytopenia in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Whether this agent, a pentasaccharide, will have sufficient antithrombotic potency for clinical use remains an important question. An important property of some of the newer heparin fractions is a prolonged duration of action which may permit fewer doses, thus reducing the cost as well as patient discomfort and inconvenience.     

Inactivation of heparin during extracorporeal circulation in infants

Heparin anticoagulation is necessary to prevent clotting during procedures involving the extracorporeal circulation of blood. Our preliminary observations suggested that heparin was inactivated in the extracorporeal circuit during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We tested this hypothesis by comparing heparin pharmacokinetics in five infants during extracorporeal circulation with kinetics, respectively determined in each patient and in the isolated circuit immediately after discontinuation of the procedure. Heparin clearance was 1.6 +/- 0.5 ml/kg/min in the patient and 2.1 +/- 0.8 ml/kg/min in the separated circuit. In each patient, the total of heparin clearances in the patient and circuit, 3.7 +/- 1.0 ml/kg/min, was virtually identical with the heparin clearance during the procedure, 3.8 +/- 1.9 ml/kg/min (r = 0.94, p less than 0.01). We conclude that more than one half of the heparin administered to infants during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is eliminated by the extracorporeal circuit itself or by blood components in the circuit. These data explain the relatively large heparin doses needed to maintain anticoagulation in infants during extracorporeal circulation. In light of these findings, a reexamination of the normal mechanisms of elimination of heparin activity appears to be warranted.     

Review of pharmacodynamics,pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic properites of sulodexide

Due to various side effects of heparin, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type I or type II, alternative anticoagulants are in clinical development to optimize the anticoagulant regimes in patients requiring low or high anticoagulation dosages. Sulodexide is a highly purified preparation containing a fast-moving heparin fraction as well as dermatansulfate. The pharmacological effects of sulodexide differ substantially from unfractionated heparin and are mainly characterized by a prolonged half-life and reduced effect on global coagulation and bleeding parameters. The lipolytic activity of sulodexide is increased in comparison to unfractionated heparin. Clinical studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of sulodexide. Specially, oral administration leads to fibrinolytic activities in contrast to oral administration of other glycosaminoglycans. Thus, sulodexide releases tissue plasminogen activator and decreases fibrinogen levels as well as HDL and total cholesterol levels and blood viscosity. Clinical efficacy is demonstrated in peripheral arterial disease, cardiovascular events, in postphlebitic syndrome and on albuminuria in nephropathy. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Med Res. Rev. 18, No. 1, 1-20, 1998.     

Determination of heparin-induced IgG antibody in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a relatively uncommon but severe side-effect of heparin therapy. Heparin-induced IgG antibody has been elucidated to be the main isotype and the most pathogenic antibody in the pathophysiology. As affected patients are at high risk of developing thrombotic events, confirmation of the clinical diagnosis and avoidance of heparin re-exposure are important and desirable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present study, heparin-induced IgG was measured by the binding of neoantigens, which were prepared by incubating FITC-heparin with platelet factor 4 present in normal serum. The cross-reactivities of heparin-induced IgG with low-molecular-weight heparin and danaparoid were analysed by competitive binding. RESULTS: A total of 81 clinically suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II patients were analysed. Thirty-seven of 38 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II patients, in whom thromboembolism was confirmed by objective methods, had elevated relative fluorescence intensity ratios (patient normal control) and 36 had positive heparin-induced platelet activation results. The prevalence of heparin-induced IgG in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II patients was 97.4%. Positive heparin-induced IgG results were: 0/319 healthy volunteers, 0/38 other thrombo-cytopenia and 2/56 heparin/low-molecular-weight heparin-receiving patients without thrombocytopenia, 2/41 hyperbilirubinaemic patients and 2/50 hyperlipidaemic patients. A small amount of cross-reaction assays showed similar results as obtained in heparin-induced platelet activation. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a very high frequency of heparin-induced IgG in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II patients can be detected using a novel antigen assay. The rapid determination of pathogenic heparin-induced IgG may be a useful tool for the rapid diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II that could facilitate further management of the patients.     

Successful use of bivalirudin for cardiopulmonary bypass in a patient with heparin allergy

Heparin-induced IgE-mediated hypersensitivity and anaphylactoid reactions, although rare, can pose a serious clinical problem for patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Bivalirudin is a bivalent reversible direct thrombin inhibitor, with a half-life of 25 min, eliminated mostly by proteolytic cleavage. There are some reports on the use of bivalirudin for cardiac surgery, particularly for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), but none on cases of heparin allergy. We report a case of heparin allergy successfully managed for CPB with bivalirudin anticoagulation.     

Bivalirudin use in carotid endarterectomy in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE: To describe the successful use of bivalirudin as the primary procedural anticoagulant in a patient with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). CASE SUMMARY: A 73-year-old white man presented for an elective CEA 3 weeks after emergent, on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Bivalirudin was used for procedural anticoagulation because of seropositivity for heparin-PF4 antibodies and a clinical history consistent with HIT. The dose was administered as a 0.75 mg/kg bolus and 1.75 mg/kg/h infusion as reported in percutaneous coronary intervention, based on review of the available bivalirudin literature. The dosage was adjusted for the patient's renal dysfunction. The outcome was successful, with the patient discharged home in 8 days without significant complications. DISCUSSION: During active HIT, when thrombocytopenia and heparin-PF4 antibodies are present, heparin therapy must be avoided. In patients with subacute HIT, when platelet counts have recovered but HIT antibodies are still present, it is also prudent to avoid heparin administration. In the case of a patient in whom anticoagulation is necessary but heparin use is contraindicated, a direct thrombin inhibitor, such as bivalirudin, may offer a viable alternative. Bivalirudin is not immunogenic and does not cross-react with the heparin-PF4 antibodies associated with HIT. To our knowledge, as of January 20, 2006, this is the first report of the use of bivalirudin for procedural anticoagulation during CEA in a patient with HIT antibodies and recent exposure to heparin. CONCLUSIONS: Further investigation is warranted to clarify the clinical benefits of bivalirudin for patients undergoing vascular surgery of the carotids, including potential advantages for vulnerable patient populations such as those with diagnosed or suspected HIT as well as those with renal dysfunction.     

Lepirudin in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and extracorporeal membranous oxygenation

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of intermediate-probability suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) treated with lepirudin in a patient requiring continuous extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO). CASE SUMMARY: A 17-year-old girl was admitted with multiple traumatic injuries including severe bilateral pulmonary contusions. Within 48 hours, she developed progressive pulmonary failure despite mechanical ventilation, and was placed on ECMO. Anticoagulation of the ECMO circuit was facilitated by unfractionated heparin (UFH). The platelet count of 116 x 10(3)/mm(3) after initiation of ECMO gradually decreased over 5 days to 44 x 10(3)/mm(3). On ECMO day 5, a highly positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for HIT antibodies was reported, and the UFH infusion was discontinued. Lepirudin was immediately started with a bolus of 0.1 mg/kg, followed by an infusion of 0.12 mg/kg/h, with a target activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ratio approximately 2 times control. The ECMO circuit was maintained without any unexpected bleeding complications or thrombosis for 6 additional days until the patient died secondary to pulmonary failure after ECMO was removed. DISCUSSION: Use of ECMO typically requires continuous infusion of UFH to keep the circuit from clotting. In patients with HIT, alternative anticoagulation using a direct thrombin inhibitor may be warranted. Lepirudin was effectively used to maintain the circuit despite continued presence of heparin molecules impregnated into the ECMO circuit tubing. The aPTT was successfully used to monitor and adjust the lepirudin infusion. CONCLUSIONS: In patients requiring ECMO in the presence of HIT, anticoagulation of the ECMO circuit may be accomplished using a continuous infusion of a direct thrombin inhibitor such as lepirudin.     

Enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes

Enoxaparin is a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) derivative that exerts its anticoagulant activity through antithrombin III, an endogenous inhibitor of factor Xa and thrombin IIa. Unlike its unfractionated heparin (UFH) counterparts, enoxaparin has a greater bioavailability, lower incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and more stable and predictable anticoagulation, allowing fixed dosing without the need for monitoring. These advantages make it an attractive anticoagulant to be used in acute coronary syndrome management. Indeed, several clinical trials and meta-analyses have consistently demonstrated the efficacy of enoxaparin in reducing cardiovascular events and mortality in this population. Although initial clinical trials with enoxaparin during the early conservative approach suggested superior efficacy without differences in safety compared with UFH, emerging data in the current era of early revascularization approach indicate that superior effects of enoxaparin over heparin in reducing clinical events should be balanced against an increase in major hemorrhagic complications. Enoxaparin is a rational alternative to UFH in patients presenting with either unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or ST-elevation myocardial infarction, with a clinically modest increase in bleeding complications.