Systemic Treatment of Patients with Advanced,Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Emergence of Therapies

To date, sorafenib, a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the only systemic agent approved by the FDA in the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several other tyrosine kinase-inhibiting agents have been investigated in the first-line setting, either alone (sunitinib, brivanib, linifanib, and lenvatinib) or in combination with sorafenib (erlotinib and doxorubicin) in phase 3 trials. However, none of these studies demonstrated an improvement in survival over sorafenib. Many agents have also been tested in patients with HCC whose disease has progressed on sorafenib, but regorafenib is the only one to have demonstrated efficacy in this setting in a randomized, phase 3 trial. There were no clear survival benefits shown with everolimus, brivanib, or ramucirumab as second-line therapy. Nivolumab has also shown promising efficacy in patients with HCC who progressed on sorafenib, which was recently granted approval by the FDA, although larger confirmative trials may be considered. The treatment landscape for patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular tumors has remained fairly static for the past 10 years, with multiple failed trials yield little change in the way these patients might be treated. However, recent findings for regorafenib, lenvatinib, and nivolumab have led to the most significant changes in the treatment paradigm in years.     

Drug Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: First-Line and Beyond

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has high mortality. The option of systemic therapy has increased significantly over the past five years. Sorafenib was the first multikinase inhibitor, introduced in 2007, as a treatment option for HCC, and it was the only effective systemic treatment for more than ten years. It was not until 2017 that several breakthroughs were made in the development of systemic strategies. Lenvatinib, another multikinase inhibitor, stood out successfully after sorafenib, and has been applied to clinical use in the first-line setting. Other multikinase inhibitors such as regorafenib, ramucirumab and cabozantinib, were approved in quick succession as second-line therapies. Concurrently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have readily become established treatments for many solid tumors, including HCC. The most studied ICIs to date, target programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), its ligand PD-L1, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4). These ICIs have demonstrated efficacy in treating advanced HCC. More recently, combination of bevacizumab and atezolizumab (ICI targeting PD-L1) was approved as the gold-standard first-line therapy. Combination of ICIs with nivolumab and ipilimumab was also approved in the second-line setting for those who failed sorafenib. At the moment, numerous clinical trials in advanced HCC are underway, which will bring continuous change to the management, and increase the survival, for patients with advanced HCC. Our review article: (1) summarizes United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) approved systemic therapies in advanced HCC, (2) reports the evidence of currently approved treatments, (3) discusses potential drugs/drug combinations being currently tested in phase III clinical trials, and (4) proposes possible future directions in drug development for advanced HCC.     

Metastatic melanoma: scientific rationale for sorafenib treatment and clinical results

In advanced metastatic melanoma (AJCC stage IV), the prognosis is still poor, and views differ on the appropriate systemic treatment for these patients. Therefore, new approaches in therapeutic regimens are mandatory. Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets 2 classes of kinases which are known to be involved in both tumor proliferation and angiogenesis. These kinases include Raf kinases and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor. Sorafenib has been evaluated as a single therapy agent as well as in combination with various chemotherapeutical drugs in a number of clinical trials. The vast majority of clinical data exists for patients with advanced renal cell cancer for which sorafenib has been approved by the FDA and EMEA. Very recently, sorafenib was approved for advanced hepatocellular cancers due to its overall survival improvement. Since B-raf gene mutations have been found in 69% of melanoma cell lines, sorafenib was brought into various phase I/II and phase III trials in metastatic melanoma. However, as a single-agent therapy, sorafenib seems to be of limited use. Also, the combination of sorafenib with the chemotherapeutic agents carboplatin and paclitaxel has failed to show superiority in progression-free and overall survival compared to the same chemoregimen plus an oral placebo in a phase III trial (PRISM study). More promising data were observed in large-sized phase II studies on dacarbazine (DTIC) plus sorafenib and temozolomide plus sorafenib. However, these data need to be confirmed in prospective randomized phase III trials. Till then, sorafenib remains an interesting but still experimental new agent for melanoma.     

Role of cellular,molecular and tumor microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma: Possible targets and future directions in the regorafenib era

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains as one of the major causes of cancer-related mortality, despite the recent development of new therapeutic options. Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, is the first systemic therapy that has a survival benefit for patients with advanced HCC that have a poor response to sorafenib. Even though regorafenib has been approved by the FDA, the clinical trial for regorafenib treatment does not show significant improvement in overall survival. The impaired efficacy of regorafenib caused by various resistance mechanisms, including epithelial–mesenchymal transitions, inflammation, angiogenesis, hypoxia, oxidative stress, fibrosis and autophagy, still needs to be resolved. In this review, we provide insight on regorafenib microenvironmental, molecular and cellular mechanisms and interactions in HCC treatment. The aim of this review is to help physicians select patients that would obtain the maximal benefits from regorafenib in HCC therapy.     

Clinical trials of antiangiogenic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Angiogenesis is a promising therapeutic target to inhibit tumor growth. This review summarizes data from clinical trials of antiangiogenic agents in hepatocellular carcinoma. A systematic search of PubMed was performed to identify clinical trials of specific antiangiogenic agents in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment, particularly phase III trials involving treatment guidelines for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Sorafenib is the only systemic drug approved for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Two large-scale, randomized phase III trials using sorafenib involving patients with unresectable HCC showed a significant survival benefit compared with placebo control groups. However, subsequent phase III trials of antiangiogenic agents in hepatocellular carcinoma have failed to improve survival compared with standard treatment protocols using sorafenib. The efficacy of antiangiogenic agents in combination with other drugs, transarterial chemoembolization, and surgical resection is currently being investigated. Future research is expected to optimize antiangiogenic therapies in combination with standard treatment with sorafenib.     

Regorafenib for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Introduction: Sorafenib is the standard of care for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and well preserved liver function. However, until recent approval of regorafenib by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), no effective therapeutic options were available for patients resistant to sorafenib.

Areas covered: The present article reviews the preclinical and clinical data of regorafenib, putting them into the context of current and future landscape of treatment options for patients with HCC. Recently, the randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase III RESORCE trial, demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant increase in overall survival from 7.8 months with placebo to 10.6 months with regorafenib in patients progressing on sorafenib. Furthermore, the study showed a significant improvement in all the other efficacy endpoints. Main adverse events were hypertension, hand-foot skin reaction, fatigue and diarrhea, with no negative impact on quality of life.

Expert commentary: Regorafenib is a recently approved treatment option for HCC patients who have been previously treated with sorafenib. The RESORCE trial demonstrates the beneficial effect of a sequential approach involving two multikinase inhibitors, namely sorafenib and regorafenib, whose antitumor activity extends beyond their antiangiogenic functions.     

Systemic treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: From disillusions to new horizons

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive malignancy, which accounts for a third of all cancer deaths globally each year. The management of patients with HCC is complex, as both the tumour stage and any underlying liver disease must be considered conjointly. Since the approval of sorafenib in advanced HCC, several phase III clinical trials have failed to demonstrate any superiority over sorafenib in the frontline setting, and no agent has been shown to impact outcomes after sorafenib failure. This review will focus on the range of experimental therapeutics for patients with advanced HCC and highlight the successes and failures of these treatments as well as areas for future development. Specifics such as dose limiting toxicity and safety profile in patients with liver dysfunction related to the underlying chronic liver disease should be considered when developing therapies in HCC. Finally, robust validated and reproducible surrogate end-points as well as predictive biomarkers should be defined in future randomised trials.     

Anti‐angiogenic therapies for gastric cancer

Tumor angiogenesis plays an important role in cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. In gastric cancer, among the numerous clinical trials investigating various anti‐angiogenic therapies, such as antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or anti‐VEGF receptor (VEGFR)‐2 monoclonal antibodies, VEGF‐Trap and VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the anti‐VEGFR‐2 antibody ramucirumab was shown to prolong overall survival not only as a single agent but also in combination with paclitaxel as a second‐line chemotherapy. Additionally, apatinib, a selective VEGFR‐2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, prolonged survival as a third‐line or later treatment option in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Preliminary results of studies investigating ramucirumab plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastric cancer were encouraging, and further investigations are ongoing. In China, apatinib in combination with cytotoxic agents is being investigated for systemic chemotherapy or maintenance therapy as an earlier treatment option. The clinical activity in gastric cancer of the multikinase inhibitor regorafenib was suggested in a randomized phase II study. A global phase III trial comparing regorafenib with placebo is currently ongoing. Further studies of anti‐angiogenic therapy combined with not only chemotherapy but also immune checkpoint inhibitors are also being pursued, providing hope for improved survival in patients with gastric cancer.     

Sorafenib in der Therapie des fortgeschrittenen Nierenzellkarzinoms

Sorafenib is a novel, orally active multikinase inhibitor targeting various serine/threonine- and receptor tyrosinkinases. Sorafenib reduces in vitro and in vivo tumor cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis. Its efficacy and safety have been demonstrated in two placebo controlled trials. The phase II randomized discontinuation trial (RTD) evaluated the effects of sorafenib on tumor growth in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Of 202 patients treated during the run-in period, 73 showed a tumor shrinkage of ≥25%. Sixty-five patients with stable disease at 12 weeks were randomly assigned to sorafenib (n=32) or placebo (22%). At 24 weeks, 50% of the sorafenib-treated patients were progression free vs 18% of the patients with placebo. Median progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization was significantly longer with sorafenib than placebo. Median overall PFS was 29 weeks for the entire RCC population. Sorafenib was readministered in 28 patients whose disease progressed on placebo; these patients continued on sorafenib until further progression for a median of 24 weeks. A phase III randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sorafenib was performed in patients with advanced RCC. A total of 903 patients were randomized with 216 placebo patients crossing over to sorafenib. The trial demonstrated an estimated 39% improvement in survival for patients receiving sorafenib versus placebo. These data support an independently reviewed doubling of PFS to 24 weeks in RCC patients receiving sorafenib compared with placebo. At the time of analysis, there were 367 deaths. The median OS was 19.3 months for sorafenib versus 15.9 months for placebo. Although this did not attain the level of significance specified for the interim analysis, a continued favorable trend in survival benefit was documented. For the crossover data, the OS was 19.3 months for sorafenib versus 14.3 months for placebo. Final results await more complete data. Common adverse events were qualitatively similar to those found in the phase II trial.     

Evolving role of regorafenib for the treatment of advanced cancers

Regorafenib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) previously treated with imatinib and sunitinib, and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following progression on sorafenib. Regorafenib was initially approved for mCRC based on improved overall survival (OS) in the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 CORRECT trial, which was confirmed in an expanded population of Asian patients in the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 CONCUR trial. Approvals in GIST, and more recently in HCC, were based on the results from the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 GRID and RESORCE trials, respectively. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the clinical evidence for approval of regorafenib in mCRC, GIST, and HCC, present emerging evidence of regorafenib activity in other tumor types (namely, gastroesophageal cancer, sarcomas, biliary tract cancer, and glioblastoma), and discuss trials in progress within the context of regorafenib’s mechanism of action. We describe recent advances and key lessons learned with regorafenib, including the importance of managing common drug-related toxicities using dose-optimization strategies, the search for biomarkers to predict response to treatment, and highlight some of the unaddressed questions and future directions for regorafenib across tumors.     

Optimizing Treatment Outcomes With Regorafenib: Personalized Dosing and Other Strategies to Support Patient Care

Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that inhibits several kinases relevant to tumor biology in several cancers, including colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). In phase III trials, regorafenib significantly improved overall survival versus placebo in patients with metastatic CRC progressing after all available standard therapies, and significantly prolonged progression‐free survival in patients with advanced GIST in whom at least imatinib and sunitinib had failed. Thus, this agent holds promise as a new standard of care for CRC and GIST patients after disease progression following all other approved therapies. The clinical trials reported to date show that this new treatment has a consistent adverse event profile that is quite different from that of traditional cytotoxic chemotherapies. The most common adverse events of regorafenib include dermatologic and mucosal toxicities (especially hand‐foot skin reaction, rash, and oral mucositis), constitutional symptoms (e.g., fatigue, nausea, and weight loss), vascular effects (especially hypertension), and gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., diarrhea). To help health care professionals anticipate and manage the adverse events associated with regorafenib, we describe our experiences in clinical trials and show that such toxicities can be effectively managed with close observation of patients from initiation of dosing, along with prompt appropriate interventions, including dose modifications, if necessary.     

Phase III study of sorafenib after transarterial chemoembolisation in Japanese and Korean patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundIn Japan and South Korea, transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is an important locoregional treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, has been shown effective and safe in patients with advanced HCC. This phase III trial assessed the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in Japanese and Korean patients with unresectable HCC who responded to TACE.MethodsPatients (n = 458) with unresectable HCC, Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis and ?25% tumour necrosis/shrinkage 1–3 months after 1 or 2 TACE sessions were randomised 1:1 to sorafenib 400 mg bid or placebo and treated until progression/recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end-point was time to progression/recurrence (TTP). Secondary end-point was overall survival (OS).FindingsBaseline characteristics in the two groups were similar; >50% of patients started sorafenib >9 weeks after TACE. Median TTP in the sorafenib and placebo groups was 5.4 and 3.7 months, respectively (hazard ratio (HR), 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70–1.09; P = 0.252). HR (sorafenib/placebo) for OS was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.69–1.64; P = 0.790). Median daily dose of sorafenib was 386 mg, with 73% of patients having dose reductions and 91% having dose interruptions. Median administration of sorafenib and placebo was 17.1 and 20.1 weeks, respectively. No unexpected adverse events were observed.InterpretationThis trial, conducted prior to the reporting of registrational phase III trials, found that sorafenib did not significantly prolong TTP in patients who responded to TACE. This may have been due to delays in starting sorafenib after TACE and/or low daily sorafenib doses.     

Indonesian consensus on systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a deadly cancer with a rising incidence in the last 20 years. Most patients are diagnosed late when curative treatment is no longer feasible. With the background of chronic liver disease in most patients, the management of HCC becomes more complicated, in which well-preserved liver function is a prerequisite for locoregional or systemic therapies. In 2008, sorafenib became the first systemic agent proven to provide survival benefit for patients with advanced-stage HCC. For nearly a decade, no treatment has succeeded in providing better results than sorafenib. However, numerous advances in systemic therapies have emerged in the last 5 years to fulfill the unmet needs of effective therapeutic options. Several agents have been approved for clinical use after positive results in phase III clinical trials, including lenvatinib, regorafenib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab, and lastly immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor. With various options available, knowledge on the clinical evidence of each drug, their safety profile, as well as the patient characteristics and preferences become mandatory in clinical decision making. The objective of this consensus is to help clinicians, health-care workers, and policy makers in providing best clinical care for HCC patients.     

Study design and clinical evidence in mRCC: Can we save axitinib as a first-line therapy?

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are de facto the most commonly used targeted therapies for upfront treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). After the first era in which targeted agents were compared with placebo and interferon-α, a new phase has started in recent years characterized by head-to-head trials comparing targeted agents in superiority or non-inferiority trials. Recently, the results a head-to-head phase III trial comparing axitinib to sorafenib as upfront therapy in patients affected by mRCC have been reported. We discuss several critical aspects of this study and the results of our metaanalysis on the activity of axitinib over sorafenib in a larger population with the intent to confirm the superiority of axitinib. Despite this, the definition of primary endpoint remains a central factor in determining the final results of a trial.     

Efficacy and tolerability of regorafenib in pretreated patients with progressive CNS grade 3 or 4 gliomas

Journal of Neuro-Oncology - The phase 2 REGOMA trial suggested an encouraging overall survival benefit in glioblastoma patients at first relapse treated with the multikinase inhibitor regorafenib....     

What is the indication for sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma? A clinical challenge

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma is rising in many countries, including the United States. Approval of sorafenib (Nexavar) as the first targeted therapy for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a milestone in the treatment of this disease. The approval was based on two large randomized phase III trials from the Western and Eastern hemispheres that showed an overall survival benefit compared with placebo in patients with well-preserved liver function. The exact indication for sorafenib is unclear, however. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized use of sorafenib for "unresectable HCC", an indication which is very broad, vague, and confusing. Less is known about the effects of sorafenib in patients with decompensated liver disease, or of sorafenib in combination with local therapy or in a transplant setting. Prospective trials are lacking in these areas. We will review current data on use of sorafenib in HCC.     

新型口服多激酶抑制剂瑞戈非尼治疗癌症的研究进展

分子靶向治疗是近年来肿瘤治疗领域的研究热点。由于大多数肿瘤的生物学行为由多个信号传导通路共同发挥作用,故普遍认为针对多靶点进行分子靶向治疗有可能获得更好的疗效。瑞戈非尼（Regorafenib,BAY 73-4506）是一种新型的口服多靶点磷酸激酶抑制剂,能阻断肿瘤细胞增殖、抑制肿瘤血管生成、调控肿瘤微环境,具有良好的抗肿瘤活性。2012年9月,瑞戈非尼获得美国食品药品监督管理局（FDA）批准,用于治疗既往接受过标准治疗的转移性结直肠癌。2013年2月,瑞戈非尼获批准用于进展期胃肠间质瘤。目前已完成了两项瑞戈非尼大型随机国际性多中心Ⅲ期临床试验,分别是针对转移性结直肠癌和胃肠间质瘤。CORRECT研究首次证实,小分子激酶抑制剂瑞戈非尼在标准治疗失败后的转移性结直肠癌中能达到总生存获益。GRID研究提示,对于伊马替尼和舒尼替尼治疗后疾病进展的转移性或不可切除胃肠间质瘤患者,瑞戈非尼较安慰剂可显著改善无进展生存期,为这一难治性患者群带来获益。瑞戈非尼的不良反应与其他类似的口服多靶点激酶抑制剂相似,大多数不良反应为轻、中度,可以通过临床处理得到控制。瑞戈非尼单药或与标准化疗药物联合治疗其他恶性肿瘤的临床研究目前正在积极开展中。     

Is regorafenib providing clinically meaningful benefits to pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer?

Treatment with regorafenib has demonstrated statistically significant improvements in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival and disease control when compared with placebo in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in two placebo-controlled, randomized, phase III trials (CORRECT and CONCUR). Similar results were observed in two open-label, single-arm studies (REBECCA and CONSIGN) performed in the real-world setting. But several authors have suggested that the benefit provided by regorafenib may not be clinically meaningful for these patients. Moreover, it has been suggested that not all subgroups of patients might benefit from regorafenib. The intention of this review is to provide an overview of the existing evidence for regorafenib in terms of efficacy, tolerability and quality of life in different subpopulations according to clinical and biological characteristics. Additionally, the magnitude of the clinical benefit provided by regorafenib to these patients has been explored and whether there are poorer outcomes in certain subpopulations.     

Targeted agents for the systemic treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

The prognosis for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma is poor and systemic therapy has historically been of limited benefit. However, novel targeted agents offer promise in improving patient outcomes. In a recent phase III study the oral multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib was demonstrated to have a survival advantage over a placebo in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Similar efficacy was demonstrated in a phase III trial limited to an Asian–Pacific group of patients. While these results are encouraging, it is vital to make further progress. In this review we examine current knowledge of targeted agents in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. We also address some of the key issues that require exploration regarding the use of targeted agents in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.     

Should we move beyond VEGF inhibition in metastatic colorectal cancer? Lessons from early phase clinical trials

Data from recent clinical trials utilizing bevacizumab or other anti-VEGF agents in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) show improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) but modest, if any, improvements in overall survival (OS). Despite modest improvements, use of bevacizumab beyond first and second progression is routinely done in clinical practice. Recently, the CORRECT trial using regorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor with VEGF inhibitory properties, reported modest improvements in PFS and OS when compared to placebo, leading to FDA approval in the third-line setting. Prior to regorafenib, heavily pre-treated patients were often enrolled onto early phase clinical trials with many of these studies reporting efficacy amongst patients with mCRC; however, a collective efficacy analysis of mCRC patients enrolled into early phase clinical trials stratified by class of agents and their mechanism of action has not been done. To assess this, we performed an analysis of efficacy and stratified these findings based on VEGF inhibition versus non-VEGF inhibition in mCRC patients enrolled onto phase I trials at our institution from 3/2004-9/2012. Similar to many reported clinical studies, our data showed that VEGF inhibitors have a statistically significant improvement in PFS when compared to non-VEGF targeting agents; however, no differences in OS were observed between these two different classes of agents. We were not able to identify predictive biomarkers that correlate with efficacy of VEGF inhibitors. This should be further explored in prospective studies in order to identify active agents in this heavily pre-treated population that improve efficacy while minimizing cost and toxicity.