Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Adinazolam in Elderly Subjects

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam (AD) were evaluated in 21 elderly subjects (mean age, 69 ± 4 years) at four dose levels during a placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose escalation regimen in which the oral dose was varied from 10 to 60 mg daily, in divided doses. Fifteen subjects received adinazolam mesylate; six received placebo. Plasma samples collected during a single dosing interval in each dosing period (3 days) were assayed for adinazolam and monodesmethyl adinazolam (NDMAD) by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Urine samples were collected during a single interval during the 20- and 40-mg daily dose periods and assayed for NDMAD by HPLC. Pharmacologic effects of adinazolam were assessed using psychomotor performance tests and sedation ratings. Adinazolam pharmacokinetics were linear over the dosage range studied. Daily dose had no significant effect on dose-normalized AUC and C _max for AD. Dose-normalized NDMAD AUC values as well as values were not significantly affected by the daily dose of adinazolam. The ratio NDMAD/AD was not substantially affected by the dose. Renal clearance of NDMAD for the 20-and 40-mg daily doses were 5.6 ± 2.1 and 5.5 ± 2.2 liters/hr, respectively, and did not correlate with creatinine clearance. Adinazolam and NDMAD did not substantially accumulate in elderly subjects, even upon multiple dosing at 8-hr intervals. The dosing regimens in this experiment appeared to be well tolerated in the elderly, as performance tests and sedation scores indicated no substantial dose-related effects of adinazolam on psychomotor performance.     

Adinazolam pharmacokinetics and behavioral effects following administration of 20–60 mg oral doses of its mesylate salt in healthy volunteers

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam were studied in 15 normal, healthy, non-obse volunteers. Placebo capsules and capsules containing 20, 40, and 60 mg adinazolam mesylate were administered as single oral doses in a randomized, 4-way crossover design. Plasma concentrations of adinazolam and mono-N-desmethyladinazolam (NDMAD) were determined by HPLC. Psychomotor performance and memory tests were performed and the degree of sedation assessed at designated times following drug administration. Adinazolam and NDMAD pharmacokinetics were linear throughout the dosage range studied. The ratio of NDMAD to adinazolam area under the curve was approximately 4:1. Dose-related decrements in psychomotor performance and memory were observed up to 8h after dosing (P<0.025 in all cases). Psychomotor performance decrements correlated more closely with NDMAD plasma concentrations than with adinazolam concentrations. These results suggest that NDMAD is responsible for a significant degree of the sedative and psychomotor effects observed after the administration of adinazolam.     

Kinetics and dynamics of intravenous adinazolam, N-desmethyl adinazolam, and alprazolam in healthy volunteers

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam mesylate (10 mg), N-desmethyl adinazolam mesylate (NDMAD, 10 mg), and alprazolam (1 mg) were investigated in 9 healthy male subjects in a randomized, blinded, single-dose, 4-way crossover study. All drugs were intravenously infused over 30 minutes. Plasma adinazolam, NDMAD, and alprazolam concentrations, electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in the beta (12-30 Hz) range, performance on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and subjective measures of mood and sedation were monitored for 12 to 24 hours. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters for adinazolam, NDMAD, and alprazolam, respectively, were as follows: volume of distribution (L), 106, 100, and 77; elimination half-life (hours), 2.9, 2.8, and 14.6; and clearance (mL/min), 444, 321, and 84. More than 80% of the total infused adinazolam dose was converted to systemically appearing NDMAD. All 3 benzodiazepine agonists significantly increased beta EEG activity, with alprazolam showing the strongest agonist activity and adinazolam showing the weakest activity. Alprazolam and NDMAD significantly decreased DSST performance, whereas adinazolam had no effect relative to placebo. Adinazolam, NDMAD, and alprazolam all produced significant observer-rated sedation. Plots of EEG effect versus plasma alprazolam concentration demonstrated counterclockwise hysteresis, consistent with an effect site delay. This was incorporated into a kinetic-dynamic model in which hypothetical effect site concentration was related to pharmacodynamic EEG effect via the sigmoid E(max) model, yielding an effect site equilibration half-life of 4.8 minutes. The exponential effect model described NDMAD pharmacokinetics and EEG pharmacodynamics. The relation of both alprazolam and NDMAD plasma concentrations to DSST performance could be described by a modified exponential model. Pharmacokinetic-dynamic modeling was not possible for adinazolam, as the data did not conform to any known concentration-effect model. Collectively, these results indicate that the benzodiazepine-like effects occurring after adinazolam administration are mediated by mainly NDMAD.     

Ranitidine does not alter adinazolam pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics.

Adinazolam is a triazolobenzodiazepine with anxiolytic and antidepressant activity. Adinazolam is metabolized extensively; the major metabolite, N-desmethyladinazolam (NDMAD), possesses significant pharmacologic activity. NDMAD is eliminated predominantly by renal excretion. Ranitidine, a histamine H2-receptor antagonist, is also excreted renally and may compete with NDMAD for renal secretion. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and NDMAD. In a randomized, cross-over study, 12 healthy male volunteers received 300 mg of ranitidine orally followed by 30 mg of adinazolam 1 hour later (treatment A), or adinazolam alone (treatment B). Pharmacodynamic alterations were assessed using card sorting, digit-symbol substitution, and short-term memory tests. Venous blood samples were obtained over 24 hours for analysis of adinazolam and NDMAD by high-performance liquid chromatography. Urine samples also were collected and analyzed for NDMAD. No significant difference in adinazolam oral clearance (1,149 vs. 1,135 ml/hr/kg) was noted between treatments (A vs. B, respectively). Furthermore, the renal clearance of NDMAD (196 vs. 198 ml/min) and the cumulative urinary excretion of NDMAD (% dose; 61.2 vs. 62.3) were not significantly different. Repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated no significant differences in psychomotor performance or short-term memory between treatments. Results suggest that ranitidine has no effect on adinazolam disposition, NDMAD renal clearance, or the central nervous system effects mediated by the drug.     

Effect of food on the bioavailability of adinazolam from a sustained release formulation: effect of meal timing and lack of dose dumping

Food effects on adinazolam absorption from sustained release (SR) adinazolam mesylate tablets were assessed in 28 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received 15 mg SR tablets, 15 mg immediate release tablets, 15 mg oral solution, administered after an overnight fast, and 15 mg SR tablets after a high fat breakfast. Treatments were administered in a crossover design. Plasma adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam (NDMAD) concentrations were determined by HPLC. Adinazolam and NDMAD AUC values were unaffected by food. Cmax for SR tablets was increased 33 per cent and 18 per cent for adinazolam and NDMAD, respectively, when administered postprandially. Tmax occurred later in the fed state; no dose dumping was observed. Meal timing effects on adinazolam absorption from SR tablets were assessed in 24 healthy subjects, who received 30 mg SR tablets 1 h before, 0.5 h after, 2 h after a high fat meal, and in the fasted state. Postprandial administration had no effect on AUC, but resulted later and higher adinazolam and NDMAD Cmax. Differences in these values were less than 11 per cent. Administration of SR tablets before meals yielded Cmax and Tmax values which were similar to the fasted state. Results suggest that meal timing does not substantially affect adinazolam absorption from the SR tablet.     

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam: multi-ethnic comparisons

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and N-demethyladinazolam (NDMAD), its major active metabolite, were compared in 39 healthy male volunteers (13 Asian, 12 Caucasian and 14 African-American). In a four-way, double-blind crossover design, subjects were administered (1) 30 mg oral adinazolam mesylate SR tablets, (2) 10 mg parenteral (IV) adinazolam mesylate, (3) 30 mg IV NDMAD and (4) placebo. Venous blood samples were collected at specific time intervals after drug administration and assayed for adinazolam and NDMAD concentrations. Sedation was rated at the time of each blood draw according to the Nurse-Rated Sedation Scale, and the digit-symbol substitution test was administered to evaluate psychomotor performance. After IV administration of adinazolam, Asians manifested significantly higher C_max, larger AUC and lower CL of both adinazolam and NDMAD than their Caucasian and African-American counterparts. Likewise, after IV NDMAD Asians had significantly higher NDMAD C_max and AUC than Caucasians and African-Americans. Most of these differences remained statistically significant after controlling for body surface area. With PO adinazolam, Asians also manifested substantially higher C_max, larger AUC and lower CL for both adinazolam and NDMAD; however, with the exception of C_max, these differences did not reach statistical significance. These results are in accordance with previous observations for ethnic-related differences in drug pharmacokinetics. In contrast, pharmacodynamic differences were not noted among the three study groups. Received: 19 June 1996/Final version: 17 September 1996     

The lack of effect of smoking on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and N-demethyladinazolam

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and N-demethyladinazolam (NDMAD) were evaluated in twelve healthy non-smokers (NS) and twelve smokers (S, ? 20 cigarettes/day) following a single 60 mg dose of adinazolam mesylate sustained-release tablets in an open-label, parallel-group design. Venous blood samples were collected for up to 36 h following drug administration and assayed for adinazolam and NDMAD by HPLC. Urine samples were also collected and assayed for NDMAD by HPLC. Psychomotor performance was measured using the Neurobehavioral Evaluation System. No significant differences were observed in adinazolam oral clearance (51.8±25.8 versus 48.2±14.01 h^?1) or peak adinazolam plasma concentrations (C_max) (93.3±31.8 versus 90.4±18.0 ng ml^?1) between groups. NDMAD AUC (2541.457 versus 2798±447 ng h ml^?1) and C_max (173±30.3 versus 175±26.9 ng ml^?1) did not differ significantly between groups. NDMAD renal clearance was significantly lower in smokers than non-smokers (8.7±0.7 versus 10.7±2.71 h^?1; p<0.05), but the clinical significance of this observation is unclear. Marginally significant differences were seen between groups in the symbol-digit substitution and digit span (forward) tasks. The results suggest that smoking has little effect on adinazolam and NDMAD pharmacokinetics or psychomotor effects but that smoking may slightly decrease renal clearance of NDMAD.     

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Immediate-Release and Sustained-Release Adinazolam Mesylate Tablets After Single- and Multiple-Dose Administration

The effect of adinazolam release rate on psychomotor performance and sedation was assessed by administering 40 mg adinazolam mesylate immediate-release (CT) tablets, 60 mg sustained-release (SR) tablets, and placebo in a double-blind crossover study in 15 healthy male subjects. A separate panel of 16 subjects received the above single doses and multiple-dose regimens of 40 mg CT tablets every 8 hr and 60 mg SR tablets every 12 hr according to a crossover design. Psychomotor performance was assessed by digit symbol substitution test, card sorting tasks, and sedation ratings. Following single-dose administration, dose-corrected adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam (NDMAD) AUC values were equivalent for SR and CT tablets. Peak adinazolam and NDMAD levels were lower and occurred later for the SR tablets. Decrements in card sorting were 50 and 3% at 1 hr and 17 and 20% at 6 hr for the CT and SR tablets, respectively. Maximal sedation scores were lower for the SR tablets compared to the CT. Dose-corrected AUC was comparable between single and multiple doses for both adinazolam and NDMAD; no differences were observed in 24-hr AUC at steady-state between CT and SR tablets. Fluctuation ratios were reduced for both adinazolam and NDMAD following SR tablets. Psychomotor and sedative effects were attenuated upon multiple dosing. Thus, the reduction in peak plasma NDMAD following SR tablet administration results in a lesser sedation and psychomotor impairment on acute administration, and tolerance to these effects occurs on mulitiple dosing.     

Extent and Variability of the First-Pass Elimination of Adinazolam Mesylate in Healthy Male Volunteers

The pharmacokinetics of adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam (NDMAD) were studied in 14 healthy male volunteers who received 15 mg adinazolam mesylate orally as a solution and 5 mg adinazolam mesylate intravenously in a crossover design. Two weeks prior to the crossover study, each subject received 5 mg/kg indocyanine green (ICG) as an intravenous bolus injection to estimate liver blood flow. The absolute bioavailability (F), calculated as the dose-corrected ratio of oral to iv adinazolam area under the curve (AUC) values, was found to be 39%. NDMAD AUC values were similar following oral and iv administration, and adinazolam mean absorption time was approximately 0.77 hr. Thus, adinazolam is completely and rapidly absorbed after oral administration in man; the incomplete bioavailability is due to first-pass metabolism. Mean liver blood flow, adinazolam systemic clearance, blood/plasma ratio, and extraction ratio were 1189 ml/min, 498 ml/min, 0.70, and 0.57, respectively. The extraction ratio agrees with that calculated as 1-F (0.62), suggesting that the liver is primarily responsible for first-pass metabolism of adinazolam. The unbound fraction of adinazolam in plasma was 0.31 (range, 0.25–0.36); adinazolam free intrinsic clearance (a reflection of metabolic capacity) was 4285 ml/min (range, 2168–6312 ml/min). These results suggest that the majority of the variability in adinazolam plasma concentrations following oral administration is due to the variability in the metabolic capacity of the liver for adinazolam, rather than variability in plasma protein binding.     

Comparison of adinazolam pharmacokinetics and effects in healthy and cirrhotic subjects

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam were investigated in six patients with cirrhosis and six sex-matched control subjects. These subjects received a single 30-mg oral dose of adinazolam mesylate. Serial blood samples were collected for 24 hours after drug administration. Plasma was assayed for adinazolam and mono-desmethyl-adinazolam (NDMAD) concentrations by a specific HPLC technique. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental methods. Psychomotor effects of adinazolam were assessed using a digit-symbol substitution test (DSST) and aiming test (AIM). Memory effects were assessed by a modification of the Randt memory test (MEM); sedation was assessed using an observer-rated scale. Differences in pharmacokinetics of the parent drug were noted: adinazolam oral clearance was lower in patients with cirrhosis (35.0 +/- 27.9 L/hr) than in normal subjects (73.7 +/- 22.1 L/hr; P = .024); Kel was significantly lower in patients with cirrhosis (.126 +/- .084 vs. .278 +/- .070; P = .007), whereas the mean t1/2 in patients with cirrhosis was 7.70 hours as compared with 2.67 hours in normal subjects. Cmax was higher in the group with cirrhosis (266 +/- 95.5 vs. 153 +/- 29.3 ng/mL; P = .019). For NDMAD, Kel was lower in cirrhotic subjects and resulted in a prolonged t1/2 in cirrhotic subjects compared with normal subjects (6.70 vs. 3.79 hr; P = .0152). NDMAD AUC tended to be higher in cirrhotic subjects (1515 +/- 254 vs. 1162 +/- 254 ng.hr/mL; P = .064). No significant differences were noted in psychomotor performance, memory, or sedation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam after oral and intravenous dosing in healthy young and elderly volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam were studied in 18 young subjects, from 21 to 36 years of age, and 18 elderly subjects, ranging in age from 65 to 76 years. Nine men and 9 women per age group were studied in a randomized three-way crossover design. Single doses of one 30-mg adinazolam mesylate sustained release tablet, one 30-mg immediate release tablet, and 15 mg of intravenous adinazolam mesylate were administered. Plasma adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, and psychomotor performance tests, including digit-symbol substitution and two card-sorting tasks, were performed. An effect index, defined as the maximal performance decrement divided by N-desmethyladinazolam maximum plasma concentration was calculated as a measure of sensitivity to these effects. Adinazolam oral and systemic clearances were reduced approximately 30% and 25%, respectively, in elderly volunteers. Adinazolam half-life was prolonged approximately 40% in the elderly after oral dosing. N-Desmethyladinazolam plasma concentrations and half-life were increased approximately 40% in elderly volunteers. Psychomotor performance decrements were observed following all treatments; decrements were lowest following sustained release tablets and intravenous adinazolam. Maximal performance decrements in elderly subjects were approximately twice those observed in young subjects. No significant influence of age on the effect index for digit-symbol substitution was evident. Effect indices for card-sorting tests were significantly higher in the elderly. Lower clearances of adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam are observed in elderly volunteers, and increased N-desmethyladinazolam levels contribute to increased psychomotor performance decrements in elderly subjects. Results also suggest that elderly subjects may be more sensitive to certain cognitive effects of N-desmethyladinazolam.     

N-desmethyladinazolam pharmacokinetics and behavioral effects following administration of 10–50 mg oral doses in healthy volunteers

Results of previous studies suggest that N-desmethyladinazolam, the major metabolite of adinazolam in man, contributes substantially to psychomotor effects and sedation observed following adinazolam administration. Therefore, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of N-desmethyladinazolam were explored following administration of single oral doses of placebo and solutions containing 10, 30, and 50 mg N-desmethyladinazolam mesylate in a double-blind, randomized, four-way crossover design to 15 healthy male volunteers. Plasma concentrations of N-desmethyladinazolam were determined by HPLC. Psychomotor performance tests (digit symbol substitution and card sorting by fours and suits), memory tests and sedation scoring were also performed following drug administration. N-desmethyladinazolam pharmacokinetics were dose independent over this range. Doserelated performance effects were observed at 1, 2, and 6 h after dosing. Memory was likewise affected at 2 h. Psychomotor performance decrements correlated with log N-desmethyladinazolam plasma concentrations. Analysis of the relationship between percentage decrements in digit-symbol substitution and plasma N-desmethyladinazolam using the Hill equation revealed a EC₅₀ of 325 ng/ml. These results establish the relationship between N-desmethyladinazolam plasma concentrations and performance effects; these data will be helpful in assessing the contribution of N-desmethyladinazolam to clinical effects observed after adinazolam administration.     

Effects of adinazolam and diazepam,alone and in combination with ethanol,on psychomotor and cognitive performance and on autonomic nervous system reactivity in healthy volunteers

Summary Effects on psychomotor and cognitive performance of adinazolam (15 or 30 mg), alone and in combination with ethanol (0.8 g/kg), were studied in healthy male volunteers and compared to effects of 10 mg diazepam.Adinazolam 30 mg produced relatively long-lasting impairments on tests of tracking, attention, verbal and nonverbal information processing, and memory. Adinazolam 15 mg resulted in descreased visual information processing. Adinazolam decreased supine mean arterial pressure, but only the 15 mg resulted in a tendency for decreased plasma norepinephrine concentrations.After standing for 5 min, 30 mg adinazolam was associated with increased heart rate.Although ethanol consumption produced additive decrements on a continuous performance task, there was little evidence to support a synergistic effect.Adinazolam 30 mg was accompanied by increased self-reports of side effects, especially drowsiness.     

Kinetic Characterization and Identification of the Enzymes Responsible for the Hepatic Biotransformation of Adinazolam and N-Desmethyladinazolam in Man

The kinetics of the N-demethylation of adinazolam to N-desmethyladinazolam (NDMAD), and of NDMAD to didesmethyladinazolam (DDMAD), were studied with human liver microsomes using substrate concentrations in the range 10–1000 μm . The specific cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms mediating the biotransformations were identified using microsomes containing specific recombinant CYP isozymes expressed in human lympho-blastoid cells, and by the use of CYP isoform-selective chemical inhibitors. Adinazolam was demethylated by human liver microsomes to NDMAD, and NDMAD was demethylated to DDMAD; the substrate concentrations, K_m, at which the reaction velocities were 50% of the maximum were 92 and 259 μm , respectively. Another metabolite of yet undetermined identity (U) was also formed from NDMAD (K_m 498 μm ). Adinazolam was demethylated by cDNA-expressed CYP 2C19 (K_m 39 μm ) and CYP 3A4 (K_m 83 μm ); no detectable activity was observed for CYPs 1A2, 2C9, 2D6 and 2E1. Ketoconazole, a relatively specific CYP 3A4 inhibitor, inhibited the reaction; the concentration resulting in 50% of maximum inhibition, IC50, was 0·15 μm and the inhibition constant, K_i, was < 0·04 μm in five of six livers tested. Troleandomycin, a specific inhibitor of CYP 3A4, inhibited adinazolam N-demethylation with an IC50 of 1·96 μm . The CYP 2C19-inhibitor omeprazole resulted in only partial inhibition (IC50 21 μm ) and sulphaphenazole, α-naphthoflavone, quinidine and diethyldithiocarbamate did not inhibit the reaction. NDMAD was demethylated by cDNA-expressed CYP 3A4 (K_m 220 μm , Hill number A 1·21), CYP 2C19 (K_m 187 μm , Hill number A 1·29) and CYP 2C9 (K_m 1068 μm ). Formation of U was catalysed by CYP 3A4 alone. Ketoconazole strongly inhibited NDMAD demethylation (IC50 0·14 μm ) and formation of U (IC50 < 0·1 μm ) whereas omeprazole and sulphaphenazole had no effect on reaction rates. These results show that CYP 3A4 is the primary hepatic CYP isoform mediating the N-demethylation of adinazolam and NDMAD. Co-administration of adinazolam with CYP 3A4 inhibitors such as ketoconazole or erythromycin might lead to reduced efficacy, since adinazolam by itself has relatively weak benzodiazepine agonist activity, with much of the pharmacological activity of adinazolam being attributable to its active metabolite NDMAD.     

Influence of repeated administration of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam in healthy subjects

Summary Adinazolam is a new triazolobenzodiazepine bearing an alkyl-amino side chain. A cross-over double-blind placebo controlled study was carried out in 12 healthy volunteers, in order to check the possible interaction between cimetidine and adinazolam after repeated co-administration.Cimetidine or placebo were given during 17 days. Beginning on Day 8 of each treatment, adinazolam was given in the increasing doses following sequence of doses for 3 days: 10 mg b.i.d., 20 mg b.i.d. and 20 mg t.i.d. A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study was performed on the third day at each dose. A wash-out of three weeks was included between the two treatments.Cimetidine increased significantly the AUC values of both adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam, reduced the oral clearance of adinazolam, and prolonged adinazolam's half-life.The digit symbol substitution test was significantly affected at each dose level while the manual dexterity was marginally impaired by adinazolam plus cimetidine.Saftee-up interview and Clyde mood scale indicated an increased sedation under adinazolam plus cimetidine in four subjects.     

Adinazolam--a new antidepressant: findings of a placebo-controlled, double-blind study in outpatients with major depression

Adinazolam mesylate, a new triazolobenzodiazepine with antidepressant properties, was significantly superior to placebo based on the following efficacy measures: number of subjects who completed the study; number of subjects whose total score on the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) decreased by 50% or more; and number of subjects who reported that the drug helped them. Mean scores on three HAM-D clusters (anxiety/somatization, sleep disturbance, and an endogenomorphic cluster) also showed significant differences in favor of adinazolam. Side effects were generally mild and transient; however, a seizure of moderate intensity occurred during rapid tapering of adinazolam from 90 to 40 mg/day. There were no significant anticholinergic effects, and no mania or hypomania was reported in any subject. No consistently significant differences were observed between subjects whose primary diagnosis was major depression and those with a diagnosis of bipolar II depression.     

A controlled trial of adinazolam versus desipramine in geriatric depression

Thirty outpatients between the ages of 60 and 85 with DSM-III Major Depression entered an 8 week randomized, double-blind comparison of desipramine and adinazolam mesylate, a triazolobenzodiazepine derivative. Outcome was assessed on several measures including the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), the 35-item Self-Rating Symptom Scale, and Carroll Depression Scale. Patients in both groups demonstrated a highly significant decrease in average HDRS scores (p less than 0.001) over the course of the study. Adinazolam was associated with significantly greater reduction in average HDRS scores by the third day. Repeated measures analysis of variance showed a significantly greater reduction in HDRS scores for adinazolam over the course of the study. The study medications were associated with distinct patterns of adverse reactions. Desipramine more often produced dry mouth, constipation and nervousness, while adinazolam was more likely to cause drowsiness and lightheadedness. Three of these elderly patients, all of whom were taking desipramine reported at least one fall during the study. Adinazolam may be a promising agent in the treatment of depression in the elderly.     

Comparison of adinazolam, amitriptyline, and diazepam in endogenous depressive inpatients exhibiting DST nonsuppression or abnormal contingent negative variation

Adinazolam, a triazolobenzodiazepine that has an action similar to antidepressants in several pharmacological tests, was compared with amitriptyline and diazepam in endogenous depressive inpatients exhibiting dexamethasone suppression test non-suppression and/or abnormal contingent negative variation. Three parallel groups of 22 patients received in double-blind conditions either adinazolam (60-90 mg/day), amitriptyline (150-225 mg/day), or diazepam (30-45 mg/day) over a 4-week period, with weekly assessments by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Results showed significant superiority of amitriptyline over diazepam on total Hamilton depression scores. On the endogenomorphy subscale, amitriptyline induced significantly better improvement than both diazepam and adinazolam, whereas both amitriptyline and adinazolam exhibited significantly better antidepressant efficacy on the core symptoms of depression. Moreover, the dropout rate for inefficacy after 2 weeks of treatment was higher in the diazepam group. Taken together, these findings suggest that adinazolam has an antidepressant efficacy intermediate between amitriptyline and diazepam. Adinazolam was, however, much better tolerated than amitriptyline, and produced significantly fewer anticholinergic side effects.     

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of febuxostat, a non-purine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, in a dose escalation study in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND: Febuxostat is a novel non-purine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase currently being developed for the management of hyperuricemia in patients with gout. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of febuxostat over a range of oral doses in healthy subjects. METHODS: In a phase I, dose-escalation study, febuxostat was studied in dose groups (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 70, 90, 120, 160, 180 and 240 mg) of 12 subjects each (10 febuxostat plus 2 placebo). In all groups, subjects were confined for 17 days and were administered febuxostat once daily on day 1, and days 3-14. During the course of the study, blood and urine samples were collected to assess the pharmacokinetics of febuxostat and its metabolites, and its pharmacodynamic effects on uric acid, xanthine and hypoxanthine concentrations after both single and multiple dose administration. Safety measurements were also obtained during the study. RESULTS: Orally administered febuxostat was rapidly absorbed with a median time to reach maximum plasma concentration following drug administration of 0.5-1.3 hours. The pharmacokinetics of febuxostat were not time dependent (day 14 vs day 1) and remained linear within the 10-120 mg dose range, with a mean apparent total clearance of 10-12 L/h and an apparent volume of distribution at steady state of 33-64 L. The harmonic mean elimination half-life of febuxostat ranged from 1.3 to 15.8 hours. The increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of febuxostat at doses >120 mg appeared to be greater than dose proportional, while the febuxostat maximum plasma drug concentration was dose proportional across all the doses studied. Based on the urinary data, febuxostat appeared to be metabolised via glucuronidation (22-44% of the dose) and oxidation (2-8%) with only 1-6% of the dose being excreted unchanged via the kidneys. Febuxostat resulted in significant decreases in serum and urinary uric acid concentrations and increases in serum and urinary xanthine concentrations. The percentage decrease in serum uric acid concentrations ranged from 27% to 76% (net change: 1.34-3.88 mg/dL) for all doses and was dose linear for the 10-120 mg/day dosage range. The majority of adverse events were mild-to-moderate in intensity. CONCLUSION: Febuxostat was well tolerated at once-daily doses of 10-240 mg. There appeared to be a linear pharmacokinetic and dose-response (percentage decrease in serum uric acid) relationship for febuxostat dosages within the 10-120 mg range. Febuxostat was extensively metabolised and renal function did not seem to play an important role in its elimination from the body.     

Uricosuric effect of different doses of irtemazole in normouricaemic subjects

Summary Irtemazole 12.5 to 50 mg in 6 healthy, normouricaemic subjects caused a maximal decrease in plasma uric acid (after 8 to 12 h) of 46.5%. The uricosuric effect began during the first 60 min after drug administration and it lasted for 7 to 24 h. Renal uric acid excretion returned to its base line value after 8 to 16 h and uric acid clearance after 10.0 to 12.0 h. Doses of irtemazole between 12.5 and 37.5 mg produced a dose-related rise in the uricosuric effect. There was no essential difference between the uricosuric effect of 37.5 mg and 50 mg irtemazole. The D₅₀ dose (that producing a half-maximal effect) was between 16.3 mg and 34.2 mg, (average 24.7 mg). The value of irtemazole in the management of hyperuricaemia and gout remains to be determined.