Similar survival with single-agent capecitabine or taxane in first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer

Capecitabine is often offered as a first-line chemotherapy option for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this study, we compare characteristics of and survival among women prescribed first-line capecitabine or taxane monotherapy for MBC. Women receiving first-line chemotherapy for MBC from 1998 to 2005 were identified from the North Carolina tumor registry linked with Medicaid and Medicare claims records, and were followed through the end of 2005 with survival data from the National Death Index. T Tests and Chi-square tests were used to compare baseline characteristics. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were examined using Cox proportional hazard modeling. There were 257 patients with MBC starting first-line chemotherapy with capecitabine (n=71) or a taxane (n=186). No differences in age, race, or Charlson comorbidity status were observed between groups. Hormone receptor negative tumors (31.0 vs. 17.7%, p=0.02) and patients insured by Medicaid (28 vs. 12%, p=0.002) were more prevalent in the capecitabine group. Time from metastasis to first-line chemotherapy was longer in the capecitabine group (52 vs. 26% began after 3 months, p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, treatment received was not associated with overall or cancer-specific survival. Among standard demographics, age was the only factor significantly associated with overall survival (HR 1.02, p=04). In this population-based study, women who received capecitabine as first-line treatment for MBC were more often hormone receptor negative and insured by Medicaid. In multivariate analysis, first-line capecitabine and taxane for MBC yielded similar overall and cancer-specific survival outcomes.     

含卡培他滨联合方案一线化疗后卡培他滨维持治疗转移性乳腺癌临床观察

目的:探讨转移性乳腺癌含卡培他滨联合方案一线化疗后继续卡培他滨维持化疗的疗效和毒副反应。方法:入组20例转移性乳腺癌患者,一线采用多西他赛/吉西他滨/长春瑞滨联合卡培他滨化疗6个周期,疗效评价无进展的患者采用卡培他滨维持化疗持续到疾病进展或出现不能耐受毒副反应为止。结果:一线治疗CR 1例,PR 7例,SD 12例,卡培他滨平均维持化疗周期为10个周期。中位PFS为12.2个月,中位TTP为7.7个月,中位OS为20.2个月。主要毒副反应为手足综合征、骨髓抑制、腹泻等,均可控制。结论:卡培他滨可作为转移性乳腺癌的维持治疗,可改善患者生存,毒副反应轻。     

Metformin in early breast cancer: a prospective window of opportunity neoadjuvant study

Taxanes are a standard first-line option for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but their utility may be limited by primary or acquired resistance. New microtubule-targeting agents have been developed to overcome taxane resistance and provide additional options for improving patient outcomes. This article reviews these alternative microtubule-targeting agents and their potential clinical benefits for MBC patients. Relevant clinical data were compiled through searches within PubMed and congress abstract databases. Ixabepilone, a novel microtubule-stabilizing drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), has proven efficacy across multiple lines of therapy, including patients with taxane-resistant/refractory disease. In phase III trials, ixabepilone plus capecitabine significantly improved progression-free survival compared with capecitabine alone in anthracycline/taxane-pretreated patients. Eribulin has recently been approved by the FDA and by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of patients with MBC who have received at least two prior chemotherapy regimens for late-stage disease. In a phase III trial, eribulin extended overall survival compared with the physician's treatment choice in heavily pretreated MBC patients. In addition, several investigational microtubule-targeting agents may have therapeutic potential in MBC. The development of new microtubule-targeting agents helps to address the need for additional effective regimens for patients progressing after standard treatment with anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimens.     

Survival of metastatic breast carcinoma patients over a 20-year period: a retrospective analysis based on individual patient data from six consecutive studies

BACKGROUND: The expectation of improvement in patient survival with administration of new chemotherapy agents for metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) is not consistently supported by data from clinical trials, which are often underpowered and have not detected moderate survival advantage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of new agents on prognosis of MBC patients enrolled in clinical trials of first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: Between 1983 and 2001, 640 MBC patients were entered into 6 consecutive trials; the present analysis was limited to patients. The date of diagnosis of metastatic breast disease was used to define 5 arbitrarily chosen 3-year time cohorts, 1983-1986, 1987-1989, 1992-1994, 1995-1997, and 1998-2001. Multivariate proportion of hazard (PH) models were used to evaluate changes in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) over time and to detect changes associated with the use of taxanes, while adjusting for differences in baseline factors among 5 cohorts. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were evenly distributed across the 5 cohorts. Median OS was 18 months, 17.2 months, 19.2 months, 26.1 months, and 23.6 months, respectively, in cohorts 1983-1986, 1987-1989, 1992-1994, 1995-1997, 1998-2001 (P < 0.0001). Age, performance status, relapse-free survival, type of adjuvant treatment, metastatic site, and taxane first-line chemotherapy were all associated with survival. These data failed to provide an indication of temporal trend and suggested a reduction in hazard of death in two cohorts (1995-1997 and 1998-2001) where taxane was added to first-line chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis provided evidence of improvement in prognosis of MBC patients that was associated with use of modern chemotherapeutic agents independent of time.     

How to maximize the efficacy of taxanes in breast cancer

The life-expectancy of women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is closely linked to response to therapy. A significant increase in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) has been demonstrated in women who achieve a complete response. Anthracycline combinations have been proven as highly effective in MBC, and anthracycline regimens plus cyclophosphamide with or without fluorouracil were established as first-line chemotherapy for MBC in the 1990s. Clinical trials have shown that anthracycline-taxane combinations are more effective than anthracyclines or taxanes alone in terms of overall response rates (ORR), PFS and OS in women who have not received prior anthracycline chemotherapy. The use of anthracycline-based regimens is limited, however, by the widespread use of anthracycline adjuvant therapy and the development of anthracycline-resistance. Platinum-taxane combinations have similar efficacy to anthracycline-based regimens and are well-tolerated by patients. Carboplatin combined with paclitaxel or docetaxel is more effective than carboplatin or taxanes alone, with ORR of 53-62%. Taxane combinations with gemcitabine or capecitabine are also more effective than docetaxel, paclitaxel, capecitabine or gemcitabine administered alone. The efficacy of docetaxel and paclitaxel can be increased, and drug-related toxicity decreased, by adapting dose-dense schedules of drug administration. The addition of trastuzumab to taxane-based chemotherapy increases the efficacy of taxane-based regimens in women with HER2-positive MBC.     

Vinorelbine and capecitabine in anthracycline- and/or taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: sequential or combinational?

Purpose

The difference between combinational and pre-planned sequential therapies using regimens that include non-anthracycline and taxane in the first-line setting remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to explore the interaction between vinorelbine (N) and capecitabine (X) in breast cancer cells and to compare the simultaneous or sequential administration of the two drugs in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) as first-line treatment.

Methods

First, we explored the effects of vinorelbine on thymidine phosphorylase (TP) and thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in breast cancer cells. Next, we designed a prospective randomized phase II trial of MBC patients comparing the combinational and pre-planned sequential administration of vinorelbine and capecitabine in the first-line metastatic setting. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The correlation between clinical characteristics and class III β-tubulin expression and patient survival was also explored.

Results

Vinorelbine upregulates TP and downregulates TS in breast cancer cells, thereby further sensitizing tumor cells to capecitabine, which indicated the proper order for sequential therapy should be N → X. Sixty patients were eligible for the phase II trial. No significant difference was observed between the combinational arm and the sequential arm in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS). Only in the subgroup of patients with liver metastases were median PFS and OS significantly prolonged in the combinational arm (8.5 vs. 6.4 months, P = 0.041 and 23.8 vs. 13.9 months, P = 0.028, respectively). No association between class III β-tubulin expression and patient outcome was identified. Grade 3/4 adverse events were more common in the combinational arm.

Conclusions

Both the NX regimen and pre-planned sequential N → X regimen are acceptable as first-line treatments with comparable efficacies for MBC patients previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes. Sequential monotherapies are recommended as the preferred approach to first-line chemotherapy for most MBC patients in the absence of an imminent visceral crisis and the need for rapid symptom and/or disease control.     

Oral treatment of metastatic breast cancer with capecitabine: what influences the decision‐making process?

GÓRNA? M. & SZCZYLIK C. (2009) European Journal of Cancer Care 19 , 131–136
Oral treatment of metastatic breast cancer with capecitabine: what influences the decision‐making process? The importance of selecting treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) that best suits the needs of the patient while offering a good clinical outcome is becoming more prominent in the decision‐making process. We designed a questionnaire‐based study to identify factors influencing treatment choice. We prospectively surveyed 218 female MBC patients scheduled to receive chemotherapy who were eligible for capecitabine monotherapy. All 215 patients who answered the questionnaire preferred oral capecitabine to intravenous chemotherapy. The most frequently cited reason for this preference was convenience (72%). The possibility of staying at home during treatment was considered important by 67% of patients overall, 42% of the 71 patients giving only one reason for their preference, 65% of those receiving first‐line therapy and 74% treated in the second‐line setting. Our study suggests that most patients prefer oral chemotherapy because of the convenience and possibility of staying at home during treatment. The study did not explore patient perceptions of efficacy or tolerability, which play a pivotal role in treatment selection from both the patient and physician perspectives. Capecitabine provides a very effective treatment for MBC and additionally addresses patients’ desire to receive treatment at home.     

Spotlight on Capecitabine in the Management of Advanced Breast Cancer

Capecitabine is an orally administered prodrug of fluorouracil which is indicated in the US and Europe, in combination with docetaxel, for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer failing anthracycline therapy, and as monotherapy for metastatic breast cancer resistant to paclitaxel and anthracycline therapy (US) or failing intensive chemotherapy (Europe). Capecitabine is also approved for use in metastatic colorectal cancer. Capecitabine is metabolically activated preferentially at the tumor site, and shows antineoplastic activity and synergy with other cytotoxic agents including cyclophosphamide or docetaxel in animal models. Bioavailability after oral administration is close to 100%. In patients with pretreated advanced breast cancer, capecitabine is effective as monotherapy and also in combination with other agents. Combination therapy with capecitabine 1250 mg/m² twice daily for 2 weeks of every 3-week cycle plus intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m² on day one of each cycle was superior to intravenous monotherapy with docetaxel 100 mg/m² on day one of each cycle. Capecitabine plus docetaxel significantly reduced the risks of disease progression and death by 35% (p = 0.0001) and 23% (p < 0.05), respectively, and significantly increased median survival (p < 0.05) and objective response rates (p < 0.01). Efficacy has also been demonstrated with capecitabine monotherapy and combination therapy in previously untreated patients in preliminary trials. The most common adverse effects occurring in patients receiving capecitabine monotherapy include lymphopenia, anemia, diarrhea, hand-and-foot syndrome, nausea, fatigue, hyperbilirubinaemia, dermatitis and vomiting (all >25% incidence). While gastrointestinal events and hand-and-foot syndrome occurred more often with capecitabine than with paclitaxel or a regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF), neutropenic fever, arthralgia, pyrexia and myalgia were more common with paclitaxel, and nausea, stomatitis, alopecia and asthenia were more common with CMF. The incidence of adverse effects and hospitalization was similar in patients receiving capecitabine plus docetaxel and those receiving docetaxel monotherapy. In conclusion, capecitabine, an oral prodrug of fluorouracil which is activated preferentially at the tumor site, is an effective and convenient addition to the intravenous polychemotherapeutic treatment of advanced breast cancer in pretreated patients, and also has potential as a component of first-line combination regimens. Combined capecitabine plus docetaxel therapy resulted in similar rates of treatment-related adverse effects and hospitalization to those seen with docetaxel monotherapy. Capecitabine is also effective as monotherapy in pretreated patients and phase II data for capecitabine as first-line monotherapy are also promising. While gastrointestinal effects and hand-and-foot syndrome occur often with capecitabine, the tolerability profile was comparatively favorable for other adverse effects (notably, neutropenia and alopecia).     

Ixabepilone: clinical role in metastatic breast cancer

Ixabepilone has shown promising clinical data in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and may be particularly valuable in patients showing progression after treatment with standard chemotherapy. This article reviews the developing clinical profile of ixabepilone in MBC. Unlike taxanes and anthracyclines, ixabepilone has low susceptibility to multiple mechanisms of tumor cell resistance and has activity against tumors resistant to taxanes and/or anthracyclines. In phase II studies, single-agent ixabepilone resulted in objective response rates ranging from 11.5% to 57% in patients who had locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, including patients who were treated as first-line therapy or in resistant patients who had received multiple lines of previous treatment. In two large phase III studies in women who had locally advanced or MBC pretreated with or resistant to taxanes and/or anthracyclines, a combination of ixabepilone plus capecitabine was superior to capecitabine alone in terms of progression-free survival and response rates. The efficacy of ixabepilone has also been shown in subsets, including patients with poor prognosis, the first-line metastatic setting, and in triple-negative disease. Studies are underway to investigate this agent in combination with biologics. A recent three-arm study has shown the activity and tolerability of ixabepilone plus bevacizumab; however, comparative data are not yet available. The toxicity profile of ixabepilone is generally manageable and predictable. The most common adverse events associated with ixabepilone include peripheral neuropathy and neutropenia. Ixabepilone appears to offer a promising alternative chemotherapeutic agent for patients with MBC who progress on various taxanes, anthracyclines, and capecitabine.     

Capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline-and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer

The selection of chemotherapeutic regimens is challenging for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients whose diseases have failed to respond to anthracyline and taxane. Capecitabine has advantages of oral administration and favorable toxicity profiles. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of capecitabine and to identify the subgroup of patients who would potentially have benefit from capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC. Female patients with MBC who had been previously treated with anthracycline and taxane received oral capecitabine 2500 mg/m² divided in two doses daily for 2 wk with 1-wk rest period. Between September, 1999, and December, 2002, a total of 38 patients were enrolled. Among the 36 evaluable patients, one patient achieved a complete response (CR), 9 patients had partial responses (PRs), and 13 patients had stable diseases (SDs). Response rate was 26% [95% confidence interval (CI), 12–40%] and the tumor control rate (TCR, CR+PR+SD) was 61% (95% CI, 45–77%). The median follow-up duration was 27.8 mo. The median duration of response was 8.9 mo, the median time to progression was 4.6 mo, and the median overall survival was 18.1 mo. The major toxicities were hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, and emesis. There was no treatment-related death. The predictors of better overall survival were positivity of hormone receptor, disease-free survival longer than 1 yr, non-refractoriness to anthracycline, and fewer number (≤3) of involved organs. Capecitabine monotherapy is effective and well tolerated for MBC patients who had previously been treated with anthracycline and taxane. The TCR could predict overall survival as well as the objective respose in this study, suggesting a possible role of TCR as a surrogate marker for survival in MBC patients on salvage chemotherapy. The patients who have relatively slow growing tumor and less tumor burden could have benefit from capecitabine monotherapy following anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy.     

Phase II trial of simple oral therapy with capecitabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic breast cancer: SWOG S0430

Background.

Interest in oral agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has increased because many patients prefer oral to i.v. regimens. We evaluated a simple oral combination of capecitabine with cyclophosphamide (CPA) for MBC.

Methods.

The trial was designed to determine whether or not combination therapy would achieve a 42% response rate (RR) using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) in MBC. Patients with two or fewer prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC were eligible. Those with estrogen receptor–positive MBC had to have progressed on endocrine therapy. Patients had measurable disease or elevated mucin (MUC)-1 antigen and received CPA, 100 mg daily on days 1–14, and capecitabine, 1,500 mg twice daily on days 8–21, in 21-day cycles.

Results.

In 96 eligible patients, the median progression-free survival (PFS) interval was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7–8.0 months) and median overall survival (OS) time was 18.8 months (95% CI, 13.1–22.0 months). The RR was 36% (95% CI, 26%–48%) in 80 patients with measurable disease. The MUC-1 antigen RR was 33% (95% CI, 20%–48%), occurring in 15 of 46 patients with elevated MUC-1 antigen. Toxicity was mild, with no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusions.

PFS, OS, and RR outcomes with capecitabine plus CPA compare favorably with those of capecitabine monotherapy and combination therapy with bevacizumab, sorafenib, or ixabepilone. The addition of these other agents to capecitabine does not improve OS time in MBC patients, and this single-arm study does not suggest that the addition of CPA to capecitabine has this potential in an unselected MBC population. When OS prolongation is the goal, clinicians should choose single-agent capecitabine.     

Oral capecitabine: bridging the Atlantic divide in colon cancer treatment

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin (LV) has been the mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC), with infused schedules more widely adopted in Europe and bolus schedules preferred in North America. However, the effective, oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine is increasingly replacing intravenous (IV) 5-FU/LV on both sides of the Atlantic. Capecitabine generates 5-FU preferentially in tumor and is a well-established, first-line treatment for metastatic CRC. In this setting, capecitabine achieves a superior response rate, at least equivalent time to disease progression (TTP) and overall survival, and favorable safety compared with bolus 5-FU/LV. The benefits of capecitabine have been transfered into the adjuvant setting. Recent data from a large, international, randomized trial (Xeloda Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial [X-ACT]) confirm that capecitabine (Xeloda, Roche Laboratories, Nutley, NJ) achieves favorable safety versus 5-FU/LV (Mayo Clinic regimen) and is at least as effective as IV 5-FU/LV in the adjuvant treatment of patients with resected stage III colon cancer. Capecitabine is also an effective and well-tolerated combination partner for oxaliplatin (XELOX) and irinotecan (XELIRI), achieving high efficacy with a good safety profile. An extensive phase III clinical trial program is further establishing the potential of the simplified capecitabine combinations to improve outcomes and unify treatment practices in the metastatic and adjuvant settings. New combinations with novel agents such as capecitabine/oxaliplatin plus erlotinib or bevacizumab are currently under investigation. Capecitabine has also shown promising activity and good tolerability in combination with radiotherapy in rectal cancer.     

The evolving role of capecitabine in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second greatest cause of cancer-related death among women in the United States. Capecitabine is a selectively tumor-activated fluoropyrimidine carbamate that is converted to 5-fluorouracil by the sequential activity of these enzymes, the final of which is thymidine phosphorylase, which is overexpressed in many human cancers. Capecitabine as a single agent and in combination with other drugs is efficacious in previously treated and untreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The integration of capecitabine, either as a single agent or in combination with docetaxel, into adjuvant breast cancer therapy is justified due to its high antitumor activity in previously treated and untreated MBC, its tolerability, lack of cross-resistance with the anthracyclines and taxanes, and because combined docetaxel/capecitabine improves the overall survival of patients with MBC. Capecitabine is being evaluated as preoperative therapy in patients with operable breast cancer, as adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk node-negative or node-positive disease, and as oral single-agent therapy in women > or = 65 years of age. This article is an overview of published studies of capecitabine in MBC and the studies that are planned or have been proposed to evaluate capecitabine as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.     

Role of capecitabine (Xeloda) in breast cancer

One rationale for the development of new treatment strategies for advanced breast cancer is to provide targeted antineoplastic therapy, while at the same time improving the quality of life of patients. One such drug, capecitabine (Xeloda), is an oral fluoropyrimidine 5-fluorouracil carbamate. Capecitabine is converted to 5-fluorouracil primarily in cancer tissue and it has been demonstrated to combine ease of administration, a manageable toxicity profile and potent antineoplastic activity. Capecitabine is widely used in metastatic breast cancer and offers symptom palliation and in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere) improved survival compared with docetaxel alone. Its toxicity profile includes hand-foot syndrome and stomatitis and diarrhea, whereas its hematologic side effects are mild. Capecitabine has been evaluated as a single agent in women with advanced breast cancer where it offers an overall response rate of 20-30%. Capecitabine is synergistic with other chemotherapeutic agents, such as the taxanes, where it increases the response rate to over 40%. This review will place the available data on the use of capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer as a single agent or as part of a combination regime in context.     

Visceral Disease in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With Ixabepilone and Other Chemotherapeutic Agents

Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have poor prognoses and 5-year survival rates of approximately 20%. The site(s) and degree of metastatic dissemination are among the principal prognostic factors for patients with MBC. Patients with visceral metastases to the liver and/or lung have a very poor prognosis. Although good performance status, restricted disease dissemination, and limited extent of metastatic infiltration are associated with higher responses to chemotherapy, responses are generally short lived, with rapid disease progression after treatment failure. Thus, novel strategies for the management of patients with MBC with visceral disease are urgently needed. We have analyzed outcomes of trials that evaluated various chemotherapeutic agents as monotherapy or in combination with capecitabine in patients with MBC with primary visceral disease involvement. Treatment with microtubule inhibitors such as paclitaxel, docetaxel, and albumin-bound paclitaxel, generally administered in earlier lines of treatment, resulted in comparable responses. Lower response rates (RRs) were reported with other agents such as capecitabine, vinorelbine, and gemcitabine. Adverse events consistent with known toxicities of each agent were observed in the selected trials and related to dose and administration schedule. The epothilone B analogue ixabepilone has demonstrated clinical efficacy and manageable safety in populations of heavily pretreated patients with MBC with high visceral disease burdens to liver and/or lung (61%–86% of patients). Objective RRs ranging from 12% to 57% have been reported for ixabepilone, as monotherapy and in combination with capecitabine, depending on degree of pretreatment. Responses to ixabepilone in patients with visceral metastases were comparable to those observed in overall study patient populations.     

Spotlight on Capecitabine in Colorectal Cancer

Capecitabine is an orally administered fluoropyrimidine which is selectively activated in tumor tissue to the active moiety fluorouracil and is cytotoxic through inhibition of DNA synthesis. In patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, first-line therapy with intermittent capecitabine achieved significantly higher objective tumor response rates than therapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin in pooled analysis. Response rates were also higher in patients pretreated in the adjuvant setting and whose primary site of metastasis was the lung. However, no significant differences between the two treatment groups were seen in the time to disease progression, time to treatment failure or overall survival. Preliminary data suggest that response may be improved by combining capecitabine with other anticancer therapies such as oxaliplatin, irinotecan and radiotherapy. Capecitabine in therapeutic dosage regimens generally has acceptable tolerability. Diarrhea and hand-and-foot syndrome are the major dose-limiting toxicities associated with capecitabine therapy, with adverse effects generally of a gastrointestinal nature. Overall, diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea and alopecia were significantly less common with capecitabine than with bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin. In addition, capecitabine recipients experienced significantly less myelosuppression, although more capecitabine recipients discontinued therapy because of adverse events. Importantly, patients spent less time in hospital after capecitabine than after bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin therapy, and the oral route of administration of capecitabine is likely to be preferred. In conclusion, capecitabine has shown superior tumor response, less myelosuppression, but more grade 3 hand-and-foot syndrome, in comparison with the ‘Mayo Clinic’ regimen of fluorouracil therapy, but is unlikely to improve survival. Significantly, its oral route of administration is likely to be preferred by patients. Future strategies to improve patient response may involve selection of those patients likely to respond best to capecitabine, through determination of relevant enzyme levels and combination of capecitabine with various antineoplastic agents. Data on the effect of the drug on quality of life would help to further establish its role. In the meantime, capecitabine appears to offer an effective and more convenient alternative to fluorouracil as first-line monotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.     

In the End What Matters Most? A Review of Clinical Endpoints in Advanced Breast Cancer

Many agents are being studied for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), yet few studies have demonstrated longer overall survival (OS), the primary measure of clinical benefit in MBC. This paper examines the key endpoints in clinical trials and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of drugs for MBC. PubMed was searched (1980 to October 2009) for reports of phase III trials investigating chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy agents in MBC. FDA approval histories (1996-2009) for cytotoxic and biological agents indicated for MBC were reviewed. Of the 73 phase III MBC trials reviewed, a strikingly small proportion of trials demonstrated a gain in OS duration (12%, n = 9). OS gains were less frequently noted in first-line trials (8%) than in trials of second-line plus other lines of therapy (22%). Few trials were designed with the capacity to detect OS effects. Among 37 phase III trials conducted in the last 15 years, only three systemic therapies were approved for first-line use and nine were approved for use as second-line or other lines of therapy. Of these, only four were supported by results showing longer survival times. There is substantial discordance among the design and conduct of clinical trials, FDA drug approval, and the current view of OS as the ultimate measure of clinical benefit. There is an urgent need to reassess standards for clinical benefit in MBC and to establish guidelines for study design and conduct and drug approval. In the end, what matters most is ensuring rapid access to safe and effective oncology treatments.     

Platinum compounds in the treatment of advanced breast cancer

Interest in platinum compounds for the treatment of breast cancer has been reawakened because of preclinical studies indicating synergy of platinum salts with the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab in human breast cancer cell lines that overexpress HER2/neu. Cisplatin, carboplatin, and iproplatin are not very active as single agents in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The activity of oxaliplatin has not been adequately tested in refractory MBC. On the other hand, cisplatin is very active as first-line chemotherapy, with response rates (RR) of 50%; carboplatin appears to be moderately active in patients without prior chemotherapy (RR around 30%). The clinical effectiveness of the other platinum compounds (iproplatin, oxaliplatin, and others) has not yet been fully tested as first-line chemotherapy. Platinum compounds have been extensively tested in combination with other antitumoral agents. Cisplatin combinations have been employed as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer. These combinations are very active, although the precise contribution of cisplatin to the overall activity is not known. Combinations with cisplatin have been investigated, essentially, as salvage therapy for patients with previously treated MBC. The combinations of cisplatin with older pharmacological agents (5-fluorouracil, etoposide) have moderate activity, while the combinations of cisplatin with the newer agents (vinorelbine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine) appear to be more active. The combinations of carboplatin with the classical agents (5-fluorouracil, etoposide) are poorly active in previously treated MBC; however, the combination of carboplatin with the taxanes (docetaxel, paclitaxel) is more active. Of greatest interest is the synergy between the platinum derivatives and the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab demonstrated in vitro in breast cancer cell lines overexpressing HER2/neu. Currently, several combinations of platinum compounds (either cisplatin or carboplatin) with docetaxel and trastuzumab are under clinical testing in patients with MBC who overexpress HER2/neu. The preliminary results are very promising, and these combinations will soon be tested in the adjuvant setting. Cisplatin, carboplatin, and perhaps, oxaliplatin appear to have some antitumor activity in MBC and can be combined safely with other agents that are active in this disease. However, the precise role that platinum compounds play in the treatment of breast cancer remains to be defined.     

Systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: current options, current evidence.

Combination chemotherapy regimens including irinotecan and oxaliplatin markedly improve response rate and prolong median survival over fluorouracil with leucovorin (FU/LV), and have supplanted FU/LV as the standard systemic approach for metastatic colorectal cancer. The recent availability of five active chemotherapeutic agents has doubled the median overall survival for metastatic colorectal cancer from 10 to 20 months, and though the optimal strategy for incorporation of all drugs is still unclear, current data support the use of chemotherapy doublets in first-line rather than sequential single-agent therapy. Multidrug regimens increase both response rate and the proportion of patients able to undergo potentially curative resection. In addition, as many as 20% to 30% of patients never receive second-line chemotherapy. When used as single agents, bolus and infusional FU/LV and capecitabine are similarly effective but have differing toxicity. Chemotherapy combinations that incorporate infusion of FU are less toxic and more effective than those using bolus FU dosing. Capecitabine is under study as an alternative dosing method for use in combination regimens; however, the optimal dose has not been defined and final safety and efficacy outcomes are being addressed in ongoing phase II and III investigations. Three combinations have shown excellent first-line efficacy in phase III trials--IFL with bevacizumab, FOLFOX, and FOLFIRI--but neither of these combinations is clearly superior. Sound clinical judgment must continue to guide treatment decisions while we await data regarding the optimal combination and sequence of fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and cetuximab.     

HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer: optimizing trastuzumab-based therapy

Trastuzumab with a taxane as first-line therapy is now the standard of care for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The search for additional and more effective trastuzumab-based therapies continues. Novel combinations of trastuzumab with chemotherapeutic agents, including vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and capecitabine, and hormonal therapy agents, such as tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors, are currently under investigation in clinical trials. Available data suggest these combinations will provide additional treatment options that may ultimately lead to better outcomes for patients with HER-2-positive MBC. Evidence is growing for the use of trastuzumab treatment beyond disease progression and retreatment after (neo)adjuvant relapse is being explored to assist in clinical decision making. Already, the use of trastuzumab in the metastatic setting has changed HER-2-positive status from a marker of poor prognosis to one of better overall outcome, and ongoing studies should expand further the treatment options for patients with HER-2-positive MBC.