Comparison of Calcitriol Treatment with Etidronate–Calcitriol and Calcitonin–Calcitriol Combinations in Turkish Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Prospective Study

Calcitriol has been widely used in the management of osteoporosis, but its efficiency is a matter of controversy. It is not known whether combinations of calcitriol and antiresorptive agents such as etidronate and calcitonin are superior to calcitriol alone in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. To make this determination, 30 Turkish women with postmenopausal osteoporosis between 45 and 68 years of age were randomized to receive either intermittent cyclical etidronate (400 mg/day, for 14 days) followed by 60 days of cyclical calcitriol therapy 0.25 μg twice daily (group 1; n= 10), or calcitriol 0.25 μg twice daily (group 2; n= 10), or calcitriol 0.25 μg/day in combination with 100 IU intranasal salmon calcitonin taken every other day (group 3; n= 10) through a 1-year period. Bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar spine (L2 to L4) was determined for each patient by dual-photon absorptiometry (¹⁵³Gd) at baseline, after 6 months, and at the end of the study. There was no significant difference among groups with respect to mean spinal BMD at baseline, after 6, and after 12 months. No significant spinal BMD changes occurred in any group from baseline, after 6 months, and after 12 months. Four patients in groups 1 and 2 and five patients in group 3 developed hypercalcemia at least once during therapy. Hypercalciuria occurred at least once in 9, 10, and 7 patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. One patient in group 2 developed a renal stone at the end of the study. Mean urine hydroxyproline levels did not change significantly in any group with respect to baseline. The data suggest that one-year treatment with calcitriol, given either alone or in combination with antiresorptive agents, does not improve spinal BMD in Turkish women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, and is associated with a high rate of adverse events. Received: 4 October 1996 / Accepted: 31 December 1996     

Effect of menatetrenone on bone mineral density and incidence of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a comparison with the effect of etidronate

The purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of etidronate and menatetrenone on bone mineral density (BMD) and the incidence of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Seventy-two osteoporotic women, more than 5 years after menopause, 53–78 years of age, were randomly divided into three administration groups: E group; intermittent cyclical etidronate (200 mg/day, 14 days per 3 months; n = 25); M group; menatetrenone (45 mg/day, daily; n = 23); and C group (control); calcium lactate (2 g/day, daily; n = 24). Forearm BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the treatment started. There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, years since menopause, and initial BMD among the three groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measurements showed a significant decrease in BMD in the C group (P < 0.0001). Two-way ANOVA with repeated measurements showed a significant increase in BMD in the M group compared with that in the C group (P < 0.0001), and a significant increase in BMD in the E group compared with that in the C and M groups (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.01, respectively). The indices of new vertebral fractures/1000 patient-years in the E and M groups were significantly higher than that in the C group (χ² = 47.7; P < 0.0001 and χ² = 42.4; P < 0.0001, respectively), and did not differ significantly between the E and M groups. The present preliminary study provides evidence to suggest that, despite the lower increase in BMD produced by me-natetrenone, this agent, as well as etidronate, may have the potential to reduce osteoporotic vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Received: January 9, 2001 / Accepted: June 8, 2001     

Two years' effectiveness of intravenous pamidronate (APD) versus oral fluoride for osteoporosis occurring in the postmenopause

Bisphosphonates seem to be effective as antiresorptive agents in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. However, the optimal dose and route of administration as well as the specific effects on cortical or trabecular bone have not been clarified. To compare pamidronate (APD) with fluoride (F) in the therapy of postmenopausal osteoporosis, 32 osteoporotic women were treated for 2 years either with APD (30 mg as a single intravenous infusion over 1 h every 3 months,n=16, mean age 65 years) or with fluoride orally (20–30 mg F/day,n=16, mean age 67 years) in an open study. Both groups received 1 g calcium and 1000 U vitamin D per day, but no estrogens or other drugs acting on bone. Both groups showed the same initial mean number of fractures per patient (2.8 and 2.7). Bone densitometry was performed every 6 months at three sites: lumbar spine and hip with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (BMD), distal forearm with single photon absorptiometry and lumbar spine with quantitative computed tomography. Biochemical assessment was performed in blood and urine every 3 months. Lumbar BMD (g/cm², mean±SEM) increased from 0.632 (±0.030) at time 0 to 0.696 (±0.028) at 24 months in the APD group (p<0.001), and from 0.684 (±0.025) to 0.769 (±0.028) in the fluoride group (p<0.001). Femoral neck BMD increased significantly from 0.558 (±0.025) to 0.585 (±0.025) (p<0.01) in the APD group, whereas it did not change in the fluoride group. Forearm SPA (g/cm) increased from 0.90 (±0.08) to 0.97 (±0.10) (p<0.01) in the APD group, whereas it decreased from 0.94±(0.06) to 0.90 (±0.06) (p<0.05) in the fluoride group. Plasma calcium, parathormone and creatinine did not change in any group. Urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine, serum osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase decreased significantly with APD, but did not change with fluoride, except for an increase in osteocalcin. Two new vertebral fractures occurred with APD and 6 with fluoride, plus 1 hip fracture. Side effects were a transient fever with flu-like symptoms in 5 patients after the first infusion of APD, rigors and mild phlebitis in 1 patient. Fluoride was associated with 5 transient arthralgias and 4 mild gastric intolerances, and treatment was interrupted in 2 patients with distal stress fractures. While fluoride increased only lumbar BMD, intermittent intravenous APD increased lumbar, hip and radial BMD in postmenopausal osteoporosis and was well tolerated.     

Estrogen replacement may be an alternative to parathyroid surgery for the treatment of osteoporosis in elderly postmenopausal women presenting with primary hyperparathyroidism: A preliminary report

Parathyroid surgery is indicated in patients presenting with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and osteoporosis (defined as bone mineral density more than 2 standard deviations below normal). Many are elderly women with complex medical problems, either unwilling or considered unfit for surgery. Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) may potentially be an alternative form of therapy in this group. We studied 15 consecutive postmenopausal women presenting with PHPT and osteoporosis. Group 1 comprised 5 women who elected to be treated with ERT (conjugated equine estrogen, 0.3–0.625 mg/day). The other 10 women underwent successful parathyroidectomy. These 10 patients were randomly subdivided into group 2 (5 patients who received calcitriol 0.25 µg b.i.d. for 12 months following surgery) and group 3 (5 patients who received elemental calcium 1 g/day for 12 months following surgery). Lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) were measured prior to and after 12 months of therapy, using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer (Lunar DPX-L). The three groups did not differ with respect to their ages (group mean 71.8 years), or baseline serum calcium (group mean 2.77 mmol/l), serum parathyroid hormone (group mean 11.0 pmol/l), lumbar spine BMD (group mean 0.93 g/cm²) and femoral neck BMD (group mean 0.73 g/cm²). Serum calcium normalized in all patients who underwent surgery and none developed hypoparathyroidism. A non-significant decrease in serum calcium was seen in patients treated with ERT only. Lumbar spine (+5.3% per year; 95% CI, 1.1% to 9.6%) and femoral neck BMD (+5.5% per year; 95% CI, –2.1% to 13.2%) increased significantly after 12 months of ERT (p<0.001 compared with pre-therapy values). These increases in BMD did not differ significantly from those in patients who underwent successful parathyroidectomy followed by either calcitriol therapy or calcium replacement (lumbar spine BMD increase of +6.2% per year, 95% CI 3.1% to 9.4%; and femoral neck BMD increase of +3% per year, 95% CI 0 to 6%). In summary, increases in lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD occur following treatment of PHPT. ERT appeared as effective as parathyroidectomy (combined with either calcitriol or calcium supplements) for the treatment of osteoporosis in elderly postmenopausal women presenting with PHPT.     

Effects of cyclical etidronate with alfacalcidol on lumbar bone mineral density,bone resorption,and back pain in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

The purpose of the present open-labeled, randomized, prospective study was to compare the effects of cyclical etidronate combined with alfacalcidol with those of cyclical etidronate alone on lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), bone resorption, and back pain in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Forty postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, 60–86 years of age, without any vertebral fractures in the lumbar spine, were randomly divided into two groups with 20 patients in each group. One group was treated with cyclical etidronate (oral etidronate 200mg daily for 2 weeks every 3 months) and the other was given cyclical etidronate combined with alfacalcidol (cyclical etidronate plus alfacalcidol 1Ìg daily continuously). The BMD of the lumbar spine (L1–L4) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, urinary crosslinked N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX) measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and back pain evaluated by the face scale score were assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics including age, body mass index, years since menopause, lumbar BMD, urinary NTX level, and face scale score between the two treatment groups. Both treatments significantly reduced the urinary NTX level and back pain. Cyclical etidronate combined with alfacalcidol significantly increased the lumbar BMD with a more significant reduction in the urinary NTX level than cyclical etidronate alone, but cyclical etidronate alone did not significantly increase the lumbar BMD. Alleviation of back pain was similar in the two groups. These results suggest that cyclical etidronate combined with alfacalcidol appears to be more useful than cyclical etidronate alone for increasing the lumbar BMD by more markedly suppressing bone resorption in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.     

Intermittent etidronate partially prevents bone loss in hirsute hyperandrogenic women treated with GnRH agonist

Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist leads to enhanced bone turnover and accelerated bone loss in premenopausal women with endometriosis, uterine leiomyomatomas and hirsutism. Sodium etidronate is a powerful inhibitor of bone resorption which has been proven efficacious in the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the skeletal effects of 6 months of therapy with the depot preparation of the GnRH agonist triptorelin (decapeptil 3.75 mg intramuscularly every 4 weeks) in 24 hirsute patients, aged 24–33 years, with hyperandrogenic chronic anovulation. Ten patients also received cyclical etidronate in an oral dose of 400 mg/day for 2 weeks, followed by an 11-week period of 500 mg/day elemental oral calcium (one cycle). The remaining 14 patients received 500 mg/day of elemental calcium continuously. After 6 months all treatments were discontinued for at least a further 6 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine and hip (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Sophos LXRA, France) and biochemical markers (serum alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, urinary N-telopeptide and hydroxyproline/creatinine ratio) were evaluated at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. In the group given GnRH agonist alone BMD fell significantly at all measured skeletal sites during the first 6 months. In the patients treated with etidronate a significant decrease in BMD was observed at lumbar spine but not in the femoral neck and trochanter, and the changes at lumbar spine and trochanter were significantly smaller than those in the control group. At 6 months bone turnover was also increased in patients treated with GnRH and calcium. Cyclical etidronate prevented the increase in biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption, with the exception of calcium/creatinine excretion, which was significantly increased in both groups. Six months after treatment withdrawal BMD did not recover in either group. Biochemical markers (N-telopeptide, serum alkaline phosphatase) remained increased in those patients previously treated with calcium alone while they remained close to baseline values in the patients treated with cyclical etidronate.Our study indicates that: (1) GnRH agonist therapy causes remarkable bone loss in young individuals with androgen excess who are expected to have increased bone mass; (2) this bone loss can be partially prevented by intermittent cyclical etidronate therapy.     

Effects of two intermittent alendronate regimens in the prevention or treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

In clinical practice, a large proportion of patients have bone mass values for which a therapeutic intervention is considered necessary, but the accepted aim might be the sole preservation or marginal increases of the actual bone mass. These goals might be achieved with lower or intermittent doses of a powerful agent for the purpose of fewer side effects and improved compliance. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of two intermittent alendronate regimens in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. One hundred twenty-four postmenopausal women (age range 52-75 years, at least 7 years since last menopause) with a bone mineral density (BMD) at either the femoral neck or lumbar spine of 2 SD below the mean values of young healthy individuals, and without a history of previous osteoporotic fracture, were randomly assigned either to calcium/vitamin D supplements, alone or associated with two different intermittent oral alendronate regimens: 20 mg once a week (weekly alendronate group) or 10 mg daily (orally) for 1 month out of 3 (cyclical alendronate group). After 1 year, in both groups given intermittent alendronate, we observed significant increases in BMD at both the spine (+2.2 +/- 2.6 and +2.5 +/- 2.9) and femoral neck (+1.6 +/- 4.8 and +1.5 +/- 2.2) for the weekly and cyclical regimens, respectively. This was associated with a significant diminution of both serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and urinary N-telopeptides of collagen type I excretion. In the patients in the control group BMD decreased significantly at the lumbar spine, with a slight decline of serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. Compliance with treatment and drug tolerability were good in both alendronate groups. In conclusion, intermittent alendronate administration at cumulative doses (and costs) three times lower than those currently recommended for osteoporosis treatment is very well accepted, and is able to significantly increase BMD at the spine and femoral neck and to decrease the markers of bone turnover. These regimens can be clinically useful in the long-term treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis without prevalent osteoporotic fractures, particularly in women with lower compliance for continuous administration.     

Bone loss after cardiac transplantation: Effects of calcium,calcidiol and monofluorophosphate

Of 203 patients who underwent cardiac transplantation and were given long-term treatment with cyclosporine and 0.3 mg/kg per day prednisone, 123 were studied prospectively for at least 6 months and 46 for up to 2 years to evaluate the effects on lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) and calcium metabolism of a combined therapy with calcium, calcidiol and disodium monofluorophosphate (MFP). The population was arbitrarily assigned to one of two groups. Group I consisted of patients who had a lumbar spine BMDZ score above –1.5 SD as compared with an age-and sex-matched population and no vertebral fractures. They received daily 1 g elemental calcium and 25 µg (1000 IU) calcidiol. Group II consisted of patients who received daily the same doses of calcium and calcidiol combined with 200 mg MFP, and was divided into two subgroups: (a) osteopenic subjects who had a lumbar spine BMD Z score below –1.5 SD without vertebral fractures and (b) osteoporotic subjects with vertebral fractures. If serum creatinine was higher than 140 µmol/l the daily dose of MFP was tapered to 100 mg. Fifty-four and 27 patients from group I and 38 and 19 patients from group II were followed respectively for 12 and 24 months. In both groups serum parathyroid hormone levels were significantly reduced from the twelfth month in parallel with a significant increase in serum 25-OHD levels. No decline in lumbar BMD occurred in non-osteopenic and non-osteoporotic patients (group I) who received the calcium and calcidiol supplement. In group II, where MFP was added, a significant and linear increase in lumbar BMD was observed. The average increase reached 12.5% after 12 months and 29.5% after 24 months (p<0.0001). The magnitude of the response was similar to the response previously reported in patients suffering from vertebral fractures due to postmenopausal osteoporosis and treated with the same daily dose of MFP. Because osteoporosis and fractures are not rare in patients after cardiac transplantation, these pilot results may be useful for further prevention and treatment trials of bone loss in this condition.     

Effect of raloxifene combined with monofluorophosphate as compared with monofluorophosphate alone in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized,controlled trial

Raloxifene effectively reduces the incidence of vertebral fractures in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Recent data suggest that low-dose monofluorophosphate (MFP) plus calcium reduces the vertebral fracture rate in postmenopausal women with moderate osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the combination of raloxifene and MFP in the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteopenia, osteoporosis and severe osteoporosis. A total of 596 postmenopausal women with osteopenia, osteoporosis and severe osteoporosis (mean femoral neck T-score of –2.87 SD) were randomized to treatment with 60 mg/day raloxifene HCl and 20 mg/day fluoride ions (as MFP) or 20 mg/day fluoride and placebo for 18 months. All patients received calcium (1000 mg/day) and vitamin D (500 IU/day) supplements. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD), as primary endpoint, and the rate of osteoporotic fractures and biochemical markers, as secondary endpoints, were assessed. As compared with MFP, raloxifene plus MFP was associated with significantly greater mean increases in the BMD of the femoral neck (1.37% versus 0.33%; P=0.004), total hip (0.89% versus –0.42%; P<0.001) and lumbar spine (8.80% versus 5.47% P<0.001). In the raloxifene plus MFP group, 16 patients sustained 17 osteoporotic fractures, as compared with 22 patients sustaining 34 incident osteoporotic fractures in the MFP group (P=0.313). One patient in the raloxifene plus MFP group sustained multiple osteoporotic fractures, as compared with eight patients in the MFP group (P=0.020). MFP alone significantly increased the serum bone alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP) and the urinary C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I collagene (U-CTX). The addition of raloxifene in the combination arm blunted the rise in bone ALP, which remained nevertheless significant, and abolished the increase in U-CTX. The combination of raloxifene with MFP was generally well tolerated. This study demonstrates that, in postmenopausal women with osteopenia, osteoporosis and severe osteoporosis, the combination therapy of raloxifene plus MFP favorably influences the BMD and the bone formation and resorption balance, and may reduce the risk of multiple osteoporotic fractures compared to MFP alone.     

A Comparison of the Effect of Risedronate and Etidronate on Lumbar Bone Mineral Density in Japanese Patients with Osteoporosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

To demonstrate the clinical benefit of 2.5 mg daily risedronate in the treatment of involutional osteoporosis, the effect of risedronate on bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was compared with that of etidronate, selected as a representative of the bisphosphonates currently marketed in Japan. In this multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active (etidronate) controlled comparative study, a total of 235 Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis were randomized to receive either treatment with 2.5 mg/day of risedronate for 48 weeks or intermittent treatment with etidronate (4 cycles of 2 weeks of treatment with 200 mg/day followed by 10-week medication-free periods). All patients received 200 mg of calcium supplement daily in the form of the calcium lactate. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (L2–L4 BMD) was determined at 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The primary endpoint was the percent change in L2–L4 BMD from baseline to the time of final evaluation. Changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover and safety profiles were also compared. A significant increase in L2–L4 BMD was observed at 12 weeks after initiation of therapy in both the risedronate (2.8%) and etidronate (1.8%) groups. The increase in L2–L4 BMD at the time of final evaluation in the risedronate group (4.9%) was significantly greater (p = 0.002) than that in the etidronate group (3.1%). The changes in bone resorption markers (urinary total deoxypyridinoline and N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen) from baseline to 48 weeks were −37.6% and −41.3% for risedronate and −22.5% and −26.6% for etidronate, respectively. New vertebral fractures or deterioration of existing fractures were observed in 2.8% (3/106) of the patients in the etidronate group, while no such cases (0/101) were observed in the risedronate group. No significant difference in the incidence of adverse events was found between two treatments. Daily oral risedronate (2.5 mg) exhibited efficacy superior to that of intermittent cyclical etidronate (200 mg) in increasing L2–L4 BMD, and was well tolerated by Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis. Received: 7 February 2002 / Accepted: 18 July 2002     

Alphacalcidol in Prevention of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis

One of the major drawbacks of glucocorticoids long-term therapy is the occurrence of a severe osteoporosis characterized by fractures occurring at different sites, mainly at the level of trabecular bone. One of the major determinants of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is a decrease in the intestinal absorption of calcium (Ca) leading to a secondary hyperparathyroidism. D-hormones have been shown to significantly improve Ca absorption in the gut and subsequently to decrease parathyroid hormone circulating levels, hence normalizing bone turnover. In a recent study evaluating 145 patients suffering from diseases requiring long-term treatment with high doses of corticosteroids, we have demonstrated a significant benefit of alphacalcidol (1 μg/day) over placebo in terms of changes in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine. These results are in accordance with studies showing better prevention of bone loss and vertebral fractures in cardiac transplant patients treated with alphacalcidol than those treated with etidronate. There is now a convergent body of evidence to suggest that alphacalcidol is a reasonable, safe, and effective option for the prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, provided that serum Ca is monitored on a regular basis.     

Therapy of Established Postmenopausal Osteoporosis with Monofluorophosphate plus Calcium: Dose-Related Effects on Bone Density and Fracture Rate

Recent experience from different groups suggests that low fluoride doses resulting in moderate increases in bone mineral density (BMD) may be advantageous in terms of fracture-reducing potency. In a randomized prospective 3-year study we examined the therapeutic efficacy of different dosages of monofluorophosphate (MFP) plus calcium in comparison with calcium alone in 134 women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis (mean age 64.0 years, average vertebral fractures per patient 3.6). Group A received 1000 mg calcium/day and a low-dose intermittent MFP regimen (3 months on, 1 month off) corresponding to an average daily fluoride ion dose of 11.2 mg. Group B received 1000 mg calcium/day plus continuous MFP corresponding to 20 mg fluoride ions per day. Group C was treated with 1000 mg calcium alone throughout the study period. Bone density was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at L2–4 and three proximal femur areas and with single photon absorptiometry at two radius sites. New vertebral fractures were identified from annual lateral radiographs of the spine. A significant reduction in subjective complaints as measured by a combined pain–mobility score (CPMS) was found in both fluoride groups in comparison with the calcium monotherapy group. Group A showed increases in BMD at all six measuring sites, reaching +12.6% at the spine after 3 years. In group B we found significant increases at the spine, Ward’s triangle and distal radius, but slight decreases at the femoral neck and radius shaft. For the spine the average change amounted to +19.5% after 3 years. In group C losses of BMD were observed at all six sites, with an average loss of 1.6% for the spine at the end of the study. The incidence of new vertebral fractures per 100 patient-years was 8.6, 17.0 and 31.6 in groups A, B and C, respectively. In conclusion, both calcium–MFP regimens resulted in significantly lower vertebral fracture rates than calcium monotherapy. However, the low intermittent MFP regimen, leading to a mean annual increase in spinal BMD of only 4.2%, showed a clear trend to greater effectiveness in reducing vertebral fracture than the higher fluoride dosage that was followed by an average spinal BMD increase of 6.5% per year. Furthermore the rate of fluoride-specific side effects (lower-extremity pain syndrome) was 50% lower in patients receiving the lower fluoride dosage. Received: 3 November 1997 / Accepted: 4 June 1998     

Effects of 5-year treatment with elcatonin and alfacalcidol on lumbar bone mineral density and the incidence of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a retrospective study

 The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the effects of long-term treatment (5 years) with elcatonin and alfacalcidol on bone mineral density (BMD) and the incidence of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Fifty-six osteoporotic women, more than 5 years after menopause and 58–79 years of age, were enrolled in the study and allocated to an elcatonin treatment group (20 units IM, weekly; n = 30) or an alfacalcidol treatment group (1 μg/day, daily; n = 26). BMD of the lumbar spine (L2-L4) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and every year for 5 years. There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, years since menopause, BMD, or number of prevalent vertebral fractures at baseline between the two groups. One-way analysis of variance with repeated measurements showed no significant longitudinal changes in BMD in either group, suggesting that both treatments sustained the BMD over 5 years. Two-way analysis of variance with repeated measurements also showed no significant differences in longitudinal changes in BMD between the two groups, suggesting that the effects of the two treatments on BMD were similar. However, the number of incident vertebral fractures per patient was significantly lower in the alfacalcidol treatment group than in the elcatonin treatment group (0.80 ± 1.19 and 2.08 ± 2.73, respectively; P < 0.05). These findings indicate that both treatments appeared to sustain lumbar BMD similarly over a 5-year period in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, but alfacalcidol treatment may be superior to elcatonin treatment regarding the incidence of vertebral fractures. Further study with prospective observations are needed to confirm the results of the present study. Received: April 2, 2002 / Accepted: July 13, 2002 Offprint requests to: J. Iwamoto     

Cyclical etidronate versus sodium fluoride in established postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized 3 year trial

To compare the effects of sodium fluoride and etidronate in severe postmenopausal osteoporosis, we conducted a 3 year, prospective, trial in 118 postmenopausal osteoporotic women with at least one vertebral fracture, who were randomly assigned to receive sodium fluoride (25 mg twice daily, as enteric-coated tablets) plus calcium (1000 mg/day) or intermittent etidronate (400 mg/day for 14 days) followed by calcium (1000 mg/day for 76 days). Lateral spine X-ray films and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of the lumbar spine and proximal femur were performed at enrollment and yearly. Nonvertebral fractures were recorded every 6 months. Thirty-one women in the fluoride group and 47 in the etidronate group completed the trial. At 36 months, the mean change from baseline of the lumbar bone density in the fluoride group was 8.5 +/- 2.04% (p = 0.001) and in the etidronate group was of 3.6 +/- 0. 84% (p < 0.001). The changes in the fluoride group were significantly higher than in the etidronate group (p = 0.01). Both groups showed nonsignificant changes in femoral neck bone density. There was no significant difference between groups in the cumulative proportion of women with new vertebral fractures, with an incidence in the fluoride group of 16% vs. 17% in the etidronate group. However, the number of new vertebral fractures was significantly lower in the fluoride group (6 fractures) than in the etidronate group (19 fractures) (p = 0.05). The number of patients with nonvertebral fractures was similar in both groups. A high incidence of side effects, mainly gastrointestinal symptoms and lower extremity pain syndrome, was observed in the fluoride group. Etidronate was well tolerated. We conclude that, in women with severe osteoporosis, although sodium fluoride is more favorable than cyclical etidronate for increasing lumbar bone mass, no differences were observed in the incidence of fractures.     

周期性与连续性给予羟乙膦酸钠对去势大鼠骨质疏松症治疗作用的比较

用不脱钙骨切片的骨组织形态计量学方法比较周期性口服、周期性腹腔注射和连续性口服羟乙膦酸钠（ＨＥＢＰ）对去势雌性大鼠骨质疏松的治疗作用。剂量均为每日３６ｍｇ／ｋｇ。周期为连续５日，停药２５日后再重复循环，共９０日。结果表明周期性口服ＨＥＢＰ的大鼠较单纯去势大鼠的骨转换率降低，胫骨骨小梁骨量显著增加，从而可减缓骨质疏松程度；连续性口服ＨＥＢＰ的大鼠虽然骨小梁骨量也显著增加，但骨转换率不仅较单纯去势大鼠，也较正常大鼠显著降低，骨小梁质量欠佳，骨重建受损；周期性腹腔注射ＨＥＢＰ的大鼠骺板显著增厚，骨小梁类骨质显著增加，软骨基质和骨矿化均受损。此为临床应用ＨＥＢＰ防治骨质疏松提供可借鉴的资料。     

Daily and intermittent oral ibandronate normalize bone turnover and provide significant reduction in vertebral fracture risk: results from the BONE study

Increasing evidence suggests that a high rate of bone turnover is associated with low bone mineral density (BMD) and is strongly linked to fracture risk. Measurement of biochemical markers of bone turnover is therefore becoming a more widely used endpoint in clinical trials in postmenopausal osteoporosis. This multinational double-blind, fracture-prevention study enrolled 2946 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Patients were randomized to receive placebo or oral ibandronate administered daily (2.5 mg/day) or intermittently (20 mg every other day for 12 doses every 3 months). The primary endpoint was the incidence of new vertebral fractures after 3 years. Secondary outcome measures included changes in the rate of bone turnover as assessed by biochemical markers and increases in spinal and hip BMD. Daily and intermittent oral ibandronate significantly reduced the risk of vertebral fractures by 62% and 50%, respectively, and produced significant and sustained reductions in all the measured biochemical markers of bone turnover. By 3 months, the rate of bone turnover was reduced by approximately 50–60%, and this level of suppression was sustained throughout the remainder of the study. In summary, oral ibandronate, given daily or with a between-dose interval of >2 months, normalizes the rate of bone turnover, provides significant increases in BMD and a marked reduction in the incidence of vertebral fractures. Thus, intermittent ibandronate has potential to become an important alternative to currently licensed bisphosphonates in postmenopausal osteoporosis.     

Intermittent Cyclic Tiludronate in the Treatment of Osteoporosis

The objective of the study was to determine the efficacy and safety of tiludronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Two placebo-controlled, randomized, double-masked, multicenter, cyclical, intermittent, dose-ranging studies including 1805 women with low vertebral bone mineral density and prevalent vertebral fractures and 488 women with low bone mineral density and no prevalent fracture were conducted. Patients were randomized to either tiludronate 50 mg/day, tiludronate 200 mg/day or placebo, given orally for the first 7 days of each month. A supplement of 500 mg elemental calcium was provided daily from day 8 to the end of the month. Both studies demonstrated no statistically or clinically relevant trends in the incidence of adverse effects accross the three treatment groups. However, tiludronate administered at these two doses in a cyclic intermittent regimen was not effective in reducing the incidence of vertebral fractures or increasing spinal bone mineral density. Thus, tiludronate, administered at these doses in a cyclic intermittent regimen, cannot be considered an appropriate treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, notwithstanding a high safety profile. Received: 6 July 2000 / Accepted: 25 September 2000     

Treatment of Osteoporosis in Men with Fluoride Alone or in Combination with Bisphosphonates

Alendronate has been approved as a first antiresorptive drug for treatment of osteoporosis in men. Except for fluoride, in some countries so far there has been no approved anabolic substance for the treatment of male osteoporosis. From small studies in men and male patients included in studies on postmenopausal osteoporosis there is sufficient evidence that fluoride has the same osteoblast-stimulating potency in men and women. In our own study on 64 men with idiopathic osteoporosis without prevalent fractures, a low-dose intermittent fluoride regimen (15 mg fluoride ions 3 months on, 1 month off) resulted in an average gain of lumbar spine BMD of 3% per year and a lower rate of incident fractures as compared with patients treated with calcium only. A combination of fluoride with an antiresorptive drug may improve the therapeutic results in terms of pattern of biochemical marker response and gain in BMD. This was shown for postemopausal osteoporosis in several studies using fluoride and hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Encouraged by a Dutch study using etidronate/fluoride in corticoid-induced osteoporosis, we performed a pilot study in 33 men with severe established primary osteoporosis giving cyclically etidronate for 14 days followed by fluoride plus calcium/vitamin D for 76 days. This combined regimen resulted in significantly higher increases of BMD than fluoride or etidronate alone. In an ongoing trial we are studying a continuous, combined treatment of alendronate and fluoride plus calcium/vitamin D in established idiopathic osteoporosis in men. The results of a preliminary evaluation look very promising. A large study with a bisphosphonate plus fluoride, taking fractures as the primary endpoint and bone biopsies to assess safety, would be very valuable.     

不同给药方案阿仑膦酸钠治疗绝经后妇女骨质疏松症18个月效果研究

目的阿仑膦酸钠是临床治疗绝经后妇女骨质疏松症的首选药物。本实验观察阿仑膦酸钠不同给药方案对绝经后妇女骨质疏松症的治疗效果以及不良反应的发生情况。方法本实验为开放、随机、平行对照临床研究。纳入西安两社区绝经后妇女共80名,年龄49～79岁,绝经年限3～31年。实验分为低剂量组和常规剂量组。低剂量组为每两周口服阿仑膦酸钠一次,每次70mg,疗程18个月。常规剂量组为每周口服阿仑膦酸钠一次,每次70mg,疗程18个月。两组同时每日服用钙尔奇D3600mg。实验主要观察指标为:第二腰椎到第四腰椎(L2-L4)、股骨颈、大转子、股骨干骨密度值变化,血液指标(血钙、血磷、碱性磷酸酶),肝肾功能指标(丙氨酸氨基转移酶、血肌酐),不良反应及新发骨折情况。结果 80例患者全部进入结果分析:①骨密度测定:每组患者治疗18个月后L2-L4、股骨颈、股骨大转子、股骨干的骨密度与治疗前相比均明显升高,差异有显著性意义(P﹤0.05)。低剂量组与常规剂量组相比L2-L4骨密度、股骨颈骨密度、股骨干骨密度值差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05),表明两种给药方案相比增加骨密度效果相似。②两组患者血液指标及肝肾功能指标治疗前后均在正常范围内,显示两种用药方法均安全可靠。③不良反应主要为上腹部不适,两组不良反应差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05),低剂量组显著低于常规剂量组。④两组患者均无新发骨折病例。结论阿仑膦酸钠治疗绝经后妇女骨质疏松症安全有效,低剂量用药方案与常规剂量用药方案相比增加骨密度效果和药物安全性相似,用药更加简单方便,不良反应更小,经济效益更高,是临床值得推荐的用药方案。     

Fluoride Salts are no Better at Preventing New Vertebral Fractures than Calcium-Vitamin D in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: The FAVOStudy

Although fluoride salts have been shown to be capable of linearly increasing spinal bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal osteoporosis, the effects of this gain in density on the vertebral fracture rate remain controversial. We conducted a 2-year multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical trial in 354 osteoporotic women with vertebral fractures (mean age 65.7 years). They received either fluoride (208 patients), given as sodium fluoride (50 mg/day) or as monofluorophosphate (200 mg/day or 150 mg/day), or a placebo (146 patients). All patients received daily supplements of 1 g of calcium (Ca) and 800 IU of vitamin D₂ (D). A 1-year open follow-up on Ca-D was obtained in 124 patients. After 2 years the fluoride group and the Ca-D group had increased their lumbar BMD by 10.8% and 2.4% respectively (p = 0.0001). However, the rate of patients with at least one new vertebral fracture, defined by semiquantitative assessment and evaluable on an intention-to-treat basis in 89% of patients, was similar in the fluoride groups and the Ca-D group. No difference between the three fluoride regimens was found. The percentage of patients with nonvertebral fractures was not different in the fluoride and Ca-D groups (1.9% and 1.4% respectively for hip fractures). A lower limb pain syndrome occurred more frequently in the fluoride groups. In the 124 patients followed for 1 year after cessation of fluoride therapy, the percentage of patients with at least one new vertebral fracture after 36 months was identical to the percentages in the previous fluoride group and the Ca-D group. We conclude that flouride-Ca-D regimen was no more effective that Ca-D supplements for the prevention of new vertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.