3.0T常规MRI与MR髋关节造影诊断髋臼唇撕裂的对比研究

目的 在3.0 T场强中,比较常规髋关节MRI及MR髋关节造影对髋臼唇撕裂的诊断价值.方法 回顾分析44例髋关节病变患者的患侧髋关节常规MRI及MR髋关节造影资料,将每例患者的臼唇划分为前、上、后3处区域(共计132处),确定有无撕裂,并进行分型.其中5例患者经髋关节镜检查.对于常规MRI及MR髋关节造影获得的臼唇撕裂及分型数据差异比较采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,一致性比较采用Kappa检验.结果 常规MRI与MR髋关节造影诊断完全相同者计116处臼唇,只有16处存在诊断差异.其中,前者诊断无撕裂而后者诊断撕裂者9处,前者诊断撕裂但后者诊断无撕裂者6处,其余1处两者均诊断为撕裂但分型不同.常规MRI与MR髋关节造影的评价差异没有统计学意义(Z=0.347,P＞0.05),且具有极好的一致性(K=0.781,P＜0.01).在接受关节镜的5例患者中,常规MRI、MR髋关节造影及关节镜结果均完全吻合.结论 对髋臼唇撕裂,3.0 T常规髋关节MRI可获得与MR髋关节造影基本相同的诊断效果.     

Special focus session. MR arthrography.

Direct magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography with injection of saline solution or diluted gadolinium can be useful for evaluating certain pathologic conditions in the joints. It is most helpful for outlining labral-ligamentous abnormalities in the shoulder and distinguishing partial-thickness from full-thickness tears in the rotator cuff, demonstrating labral tears in the hip, showing partial- and full-thickness tears of the collateral ligament of the elbow and delineating bands in the elbow, identifying residual or recurrent tears in the knee following meniscectomy, increasing the certainty of perforations of the ligaments and triangular fibrocartilage in the wrist, correctly identifying ligament tears in the ankle and increasing the sensitivity for ankle impingement syndromes, assessing the stability of osteochondral lesions in the articular surface of joints, and delineating loose bodies in joints. Indirect MR arthrography with intravenous administration of diluted gadolinium may be performed when direct arthrography is inconvenient or not logistically feasible. Although indirect MR arthrography has some disadvantages vis-à-vis direct MR arthrography, it does not require fluoroscopic guidance or joint injection and it is superior to conventional MR imaging in delineating structures when there is minimal joint fluid. In addition, vascularized or inflamed tissue will enhance with this method. Indirect MR arthrography can be used to rule in or diagnose abnormalities and to exclude abnormalities.     

MR arthrography of the knee: how, why, when

MR arthrography combines the techniques of arthrography with MR imaging to benefit from the added imaging information afforded by intra-articular distention. This article reviews technical considerations for MR arthrography, potential complications, indications, pitfalls in imaging diagnosis, and commonly encountered pathology. It is an elegant study that can offer precise diagnostic information in the appropriate clinical setting.     

MR arthrography of the hip joint

MR arthrography of the hip joint is usually performed after a conventional MRI has been obtained to rule out other pathologies of the hip joint as for instance bone marrow edema or osteonecrosis of the hip. MR arthrography is mainly performed as a very special investigation, and it is executed in most cases if the clinician asks for the diagnosis of a labral lesion. In very rare cases, MR arthrography of the hip is performed to image cartilage disease or osteochondrosis dissecans or free intraarticular bodies. In this paper, the indications, the technique, and the most important pathology of the hip joint--labral lesions--will be described as well as variants of the normal acetabular labrum. After a conventional MRI of the hip joint has been performed, a MR arthrography of the hip will be obtained to search for labral pathology or cartilage disease. MR arthrography is obtained after the intraarticular injection of 10-20 ml of a 0.1 mmol solution of gadopentate-dimeglumine has been performed. The intraarticular injection can either be fluoroscopic-guided or CT-guided or directly MR-guided. After the intraarticular injection, MR arthrography will be performed by the use of paracoronal and parasagittal T1-weighted spin echo or gradient echo sequences. In cases of labral lesions (degeneration, labral tear, labral detachment) or cartilage disease MR arthrography proved to be more sensitive as conventional MRI as shown in the literature. The sensitivity of MRI to detect labral pathology was reported to be about 65%, and that of MR arthrography was reported to be about 92-95% compared to surgical results. According to the current literature, MR arthrography is the most sensitive method to delineate these kind of pathologies. Therefore, the invasive technique of MR arthrography may be justified for the correct diagnosis of these kind of pathologies after other pathologic entities have been ruled out by conventional MRI.     

Hip injuries in athletes

Hip injuries are common in athletes, and there is an extensive differential diagnosis of potential causes. This article reviews the anatomy of the hip, and discusses the imaging findings of hip pathology in athletes including skeletal, intraarticular, and extra-articular abnormalities. The role of radiography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, MR arthrography, CT arthrography, and sonography in evaluating each condition is discussed.     

Diagnostic accuracy of clinical assessment, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography, and intra-articular injection in hip arthroscopy patients

BACKGROUND: Hip arthroscopy has defined elusive causes of hip pain. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: It is postulated that the reliability of various investigative methods is inconsistent. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these methods. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. METHODS: Five parameters were assessed in 40 patients: clinical assessment, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium arthrography, intra-articular bupivacaine injection, and arthroscopy. Using arthroscopy as the definitive diagnosis, the other parameters were evaluated for reliability. RESULTS: Hip abnormality was clinically suspected in all cases with 98% accuracy (1 false positive). However, the nature of the abnormality was identified in only 13 cases with 92% accuracy. Magnetic resonance imaging variously demonstrated direct or indirect evidence of abnormality but overall demonstrated a 42% false-negative and a 10% false-positive interpretation. Magnetic resonance arthrography demonstrated an 8% false-negative and 20% false-positive interpretation. Response to the intra-articular injection of anesthetic was 90% accurate (3 false-negative and 1 false-positive responses) for detecting the presence of intra-articular abnormality. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, clinical assessment accurately determined the existence of intra-articular abnormality but was poor at defining its nature. Magnetic resonance arthrography was much more sensitive than magnetic resonance imaging at detecting various lesions but had twice as many false-positive interpretations. Response to an intra-articular injection of anesthetic was a 90% reliable indicator of intra-articular abnormality.     

Indirect MR arthrography of the unexercised glenohumeral joint in patients with rotator cuff tears.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of indirect MR arthrography of the unexercised glenohumeral joint in patients with rotator cuff tears confirmed by arthroscopy or arthrotomy as the gold standard. METHODS: Twenty-six patients underwent conventional MR imaging and indirect MR arthrography of the stationary glenohumeral joint using a wrap-around surface coil. Unenhanced T1-weighted spin echo/T2-weighted fast spin echo sequences and T1-weighted gradient echo sequences, adding spectral fat suppression after intravenous administration of contrast medium, were performed in the oblique coronal and oblique sagittal planes. Images were analyzed by three experienced radiologists in consensus. Levels of diagnostic confidence were evaluated using a four-point scale of diagnostic certainty. RESULTS: Performing indirect MR arthrography of the unexercised shoulder leads to a diagnostically efficient enhancement of joint fluid (120% at 4 minutes and 145% at 8 minutes after intravenous injection of gadodiamide). In terms of soft tissue delineation, characterization of rotator cuff tears was significantly improved by using enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient echo sequences compared with conventional MR imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect MR arthrography without glenohumeral joint exercise in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears is feasible and represents a more convenient and less time-consuming alternative to indirect MR arthrography after joint exercise.     

Diagnostic value of MR arthrography in detection of intrinsic carpal ligament lesions: use of cine-MR arthrography as a new approach

Twenty-five patients with chronic wrist pain and a preliminary diagnosis of carpal instability were examined with conventional MR imaging and MR arthrography with single compartment intra-articular injection. A new cine-MR arthrography technique, with image acquisition at every 5 s during intra-articular injection, was performed in 17 subjects. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of MR arthrography in ligamentous lesions of the wrist and to assess the value of cine-MR arthrography in comparison with arthroscopy and/or surgery. Magnetic resonance arthrography, a semi-invasive technique, increased the diagnostic accuracy of intrinsic carpal ligament injuries. Cine-MR arthrography can be considered as a promising technique especially for the evaluation of lunatotriquetral and scapholunate ligament injuries of the wrist. Received 6 December 1995; Revision received 29 November 1996; Accepted 24 February 1997     

Low-field MR arthrography of the shoulder joint: technique,indications, and clinical results

In the age of cost containment and urgent reductions in health care expenditures, new options have to be explored to satisfy both diagnostic requirements and economic limitations. The introduction of low-field MR systems for assessment of joint disorders seemed to be an option for lower costs. The purpose of this article is to summarize available experiences with low-field MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint with respect to image quality and diagnostic accuracy in detecting labral and rotator cuff lesions. Up to now, there has been only a limited number of studies available dealing with low-field MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint. They reveal that, despite a minor image quality in comparison with high-field imaging, low-field MR arthrography of the shoulder allows for sufficient evaluation of intra- and extra-articular structures in the detection of major abnormalities such as glenohumeral instability or rotator cuff disease. Furthermore, open-configured MR scanners enable kinematic studies: Besides the analysis of normal motion, pathological findings in patients with instabilities and impingement syndrome can be delineated. They further offer the possibility for performing MR imaging-guided arthrography of the shoulder. This was first described using an open C-arm scanner with a vertically oriented magnetic field so that MR arthrography may be performed in one setting. Electronic Publication     

Imaging of hip disorders in athletes

Normal hip joint function is fundamental in running-, jumping-, and kicking-based sporting activities. Hip disorders do not account for a large portion of exercise-related injuries, but they can pose a clinical dilemma since symptoms tend to be non-specific. Conventional radiographs may demonstrate some causes of hip pain, such as stress fractures and degenerative joint disease. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the hip has proven valuable in the diagnosis of radiographically occult osseous abnormalities and periarticular soft tissue disorders such as stress fractures, avulsion injuries, musculotendinous abnormalities, and bursitis. Conventional MR imaging has been less useful in the evaluation of intra-articular lesions including acetabular labral tears, intra-articular loose bodies, and cartilage lesions. The visualization of intra-articular structures and their abnormalities can be improved by the injection of diluted Gadolinium, which distends the capsule and leaks into labral tears. This article will focus on the use of conventional radiography and MR imaging in recreational and professional athletes with painful hip joints, and where possible it will compare MR imaging with other diagnostic modalities such as bone scan and CT.     

MR arthrography of the shoulder and hip after fluoroscopic landmarking

Purpose. To describe a technique for intra-articular injection in the MR suite after conventional fluoroscopic landmarking in order to streamline MR arthrography. Design and patients. This technique was performed on 33 consecutive patients referred for MR arthrography of the shoulder to evaluate the glenoid labrum and on 15 consecutive patients referred for MR arthrography of the hip to evaluate the acetabular labrum. The patients were landmarked in the fluoroscopy suite, followed by a conventional MR examination. The intra-articular injection was then performed on the MR table and the MR arthrographic sequences obtained. Results. One of the 48 injections was extra-articular, requiring a second injection. The other injections were performed without incident, and the average total procedure time for all injections was 10 min. Conclusions. This technique is a reliable method of streamlining intra-articular injections when performing conventional MR imaging prior to the MR arthrographic portion of the examination. It shortens the total MR examination time by eliminating a visit to the fluoroscopy suite in the middle of the MR study, and its use of a straight anterior approach for both the shoulder and hip joints should be familiar to most people who perform conventional arthrography. Received: 27 August 1999 Accepted: 26 October 1999     

Aids to successful shoulder arthrography performed with a fluoroscopically guided anterior approach.

One method for performing effective shoulder arthrography with a fluoroscopically guided anterior approach is described. The technique can ensure success while injury to the cartilaginous labrum is avoided, which is essential when arthrography is performed in conjunction with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The key features of the technique include supine positioning of the patient with the shoulder in external rotation, marking the skin just lateral to the humeral head cortex, inserting the needle perpendicular to the fluoroscopy beam, testing the injection with an anesthetic agent, and confirming intraarticular needle placement with iodinated contrast material. The procedure can be followed by an injection of dilute gadolinium solution for subsequent MR imaging. Proper patient and needle positioning as well as accurate confirmation of intraarticular needle placement are critical to a successful and atraumatic shoulder arthrographic examination.     

Wrist MR arthrography: how, why, when

MR imaging of the wrist frequently represents a diagnostic challenge for radiologists because of the complex anatomy of this joint, small size of its components, and little known pathologic conditions. MR arthrography combines the advantages of conventional MR imaging and arthrography by improving the visualization of small intra-articular abnormalities. This article reviews the current role of MR arthrography in the evaluation of wrist joint disorders considering the relevant aspects of anatomy, techniques, and applications.     

Arthrography of the post-traumatic knee, shoulder, and wrist. Current status and future trends

The current status of arthrography of the wrist, knee, and shoulder has been discussed with particular emphasis given to those conditions seen in patients following acute or chronic trauma. Cross-sectional techniques that impact on the current usage of arthrography of these joints also were discussed. Wrist arthrography remains the standard procedure for the evaluation of ligamentous abnormalities about the wrist. MR imaging is unlikely to make a large impact in this area until improvements in technique and surface coil technology allow routine visualization of the very small, but important, interosseous ligaments. MR imaging of the knee will likely replace arthrography except in those cases in which cost considerations or availability prevent its implementation. MR imaging undoubtedly will continue to contribute to the evaluation of shoulder abnormalities, but whether or not it will completely replace standard arthrography and CT arthrography depends upon the results of future studies.     

MR-Arthrographie des Sprunggelenkes

Due to its superior soft tissue contrast conventional MRI is the imaging method of choice in the evaluation of ankle joint disorders. Conventional MR imaging can accurately demonstrate normal or acutely injured ligaments; however, in subacute and chronic injury joint fluid necessary for delineation of injured ligaments is absent and MR arthrography should be performed. MR arthrography uses the intraarticular injection of contrast material to distend the joint, yielding improved discrimination of intraarticular structures. This joint distension with MR arthrography is also helpful in the staging of osteochondritis dissecans, since in cases of unstable lesions tracking of contrast material into the interface can be more easily demonstrated. Finally, high contrast and joint distension by MR arthrography improves the detection of intraarticular loose bodies, which often require surgery. MR arthrography, although invasive, may provide additional information in various ankle joint disorders.     

Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease: MR imaging evaluation during manual positioning of the hip--comparison with conventional arthrography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging during manual positioning of the hip, or multipositional MR imaging, in an open-magnet configuration to study femoral head containment, articular congruency, and femoral head deformity in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 12 children with advanced Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, multipositional MR imaging and conventional arthrography were compared in the assessment of containment, femoroacetabular congruency, and femoral head deformity. Images of the hips in several positions were compared subjectively and objectively. RESULTS: MR imging correlated well with arthrography for overall subjective assessment of severity of disease (r = 0.71, P = .01), with good interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.65, P < .001). MR images demonstrated all cases of hinge abduction shown arthrographically. However, MR imaging failed to depict one case of femoral head flattening. MR imaging correlated well with arthrography in the objective evaluation of joint fluid and lateral subluxation (r = 0.80, P < .01). MR imaging correlated poorly with arthrography in the measurement of sphericity of the femoral head. CONCLUSION: Multipositional MR imaging with an open-magnet configuration was comparable to arthrography for demonstration of femoral head containment and congruency of the articular surfaces of the hip. In the evaluation of deformity, it performed less well.     

Magnetic resonance arthrography indications and technique (II). Lower limb

Magnetic resonance (MR) is the imaging technique of election in the evaluation of the articular pathology. MR arthrography (MRA) consists of the direct punction of the joint with intraarticular injection of diluted gadolinium or saline solution. MRA produces distention of the capsular recess, delineates the intraarticular structures and separates annexed structures of difficult evaluation, with which it is able to improve the reliability diagnoses of the articular and periarticular pathology. MRA allows to solve some of the diagnostic problems of conventional MR imaging in the evaluation of the articular pathology, avoiding to make unnecessary diagnostic arthroscopy and allowing a better therapeutic plan. In the greater joints of the inferior extremity (hip, knee and ankle) MRA has established indications standing out the evaluation of the injuries of the acetabular labrum of the hip, the operated meniscus of the knee and the study of the "impingement" syndromes of the ankle. This article reviews the present utility of the MRA in the hip, knee and ankle joints. The more relevant anatomical aspects, the technique and the applications are reviewed. Finally, the value of this technique in pathologies that can affect any joint of the organism such as osteochondral injuries, loose intraarticular bodies and synovial pathology is reviewed.     

Clinical impact of MR arthrography of the shoulder.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of MR arthrography of the shoulder on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions by orthopedic shoulder surgeons. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Orthopedic surgeons completed a questionnaire before and after MR arthrography for 73 consecutive patients. The main indications were suspected rotator cuff abnormalities. The clinical diagnosis, the degree of confidence in this diagnosis, and the therapeutic decision were noted before and after MR imaging. Surgical reports were available for 34 patients. RESULTS: Thirty-four percent of the pre-MR imaging diagnoses were withdrawn after MR imaging, and new diagnoses were made after MR imaging in 13% of the cases. Confidence in the diagnosis increased significantly after MR imaging for supraspinatus and infraspinatus lesions (p<0.05). Changes of therapeutic decision after MR imaging were noted in 36 of the 73 patients (49%). In 23 patients, more invasive therapeutic procedures were initiated after MR imaging, and a more conservative treatment was implemented for 13 patients. Agreement of MR diagnoses with surgery was 94% for supraspinatus tears, 87% for infraspinatus tears, 77% for subscapularis tears, and 81% for biceps tendon lesions. Agreement of clinical diagnoses with surgery was 56%, 83%, 50%, and 64%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MR arthrography of the shoulder has a major effect on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions by orthopedic shoulder surgeons.     

Patient perception of magnetic resonance arthrography

Objective. Magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography has been demonstrated to be more accurate than MR imaging alone in the identification of a variety of musculoskeletal pathology. While the complication rate of intra-articular gadolinium: saline injection has been shown to be relatively low, MR arthrography is more invasive, painful, and costly, and less convenient, than MR imaging alone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients’ perception of the fear and discomfort, and to assess their overall acceptance of the intra-articular gadolinium injection. Design and patients. Between October 1997 and January 1998, 113 outpatients who were referred to Yale-New Haven Hospital for MR arthrography of the ankle, elbow, hip, knee, shoulder, or wrist were asked to complete a questionnaire rating their fear of factors most commonly associated with the procedure including ”pain”, ”needles”, ”complications”, and ”discovery of results that would lead to surgery”. In addition, after having undergone the intra-articular gadolinium:saline injection, patients were asked to rate their perception of pain. Results. While many patients expressed fear of ”pain” and ”needles”, after having undergone the injection their overall pain rating score was low. Only 6% actually found gadolinium arthrography more painful than expected. Conclusion. Despite the fact that patients expressed apprehension about certain aspects of MR arthrography, subjects who underwent the intra-articular gadolinium injection considered the discomfort less than expected. Clinicians should not hesitate to order MR arthrography because the accuracy of the procedure is high enough that patients accept the discomfort. Received: 15 November 1999 Revision requested: 30 December 1999 Revision received: 4 February 2000 Accepted: 8 February 2000     

Sensitivity of MR arthrography in the evaluation of acetabular labral tears

OBJECTIVE: MRI has historically provided suboptimal visualization of tears of the acetabular labrum. Degenerative fraying and underlying cartilage abnormalities can often mimic tears of the labrum on conventional MRI. Administration of intraarticular gadolinium enhances the MRI appearance of the labrum to improve detection of labral abnormalities. This study examined the improved diagnostic sensitivity of MR arthrography compared with conventional MRI and the importance of confining the study to a small field of view. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one hips were imaged in 48 patients. Fourteen hips underwent conventional MRI with a large field of view (30-38 cm). Seven hips underwent conventional MRI with a small field of view (14-20 cm). Thirty hips underwent MR arthrography with a small field of view (14-20 cm). Labral tears were diagnosed when contrast material was identified within the labrum or between the labrum and the acetabulum, when a displaced fragment was noted, or when a paralabral cyst was identified. All study results were compared with findings at the time of hip arthroscopy. RESULTS: Conventional MRI with a large field of view was 8% sensitive in detecting labral tears compared with findings at the time of arthroscopy. Diagnostic sensitivity was improved to 25% with a small field of view. MR arthrography with a small field of view was 92% sensitive in detecting labral tears. CONCLUSION: A combination of MR arthrography and a small field of view is more sensitive in detecting labral abnormalities than is conventional MRI with either a large or a small field of view.