Implant volume as a prognostic variable in brachytherapy decision-making for malignant gliomas stratified by the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis.

PURPOSE: When an initial retrospective review of malignant glioma patients (MG) undergoing brachytherapy was carried out using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) criteria, it revealed that glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cases benefit the most from implant. In the present study, we focused exclusively on these GBM patients stratified by RPA survival class and looked at the relationship between survival and implanted target volume, to distinguish the prognostic value of volume in general and for a given GBM class. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1991 and 1998, 75 MG patients were treated with surgery, external beam radiation, and stereotactic iodine-125 (I-125) implant. Of these, 53 patients (70.7%) had GBMs, with 52 (98%) having target volume (TV) data for analysis. Stratification by RPA criteria showed 12, 26, 13, and 1 patients in classes III to VI, respectively. For analysis purposes, classes V and VI were merged. There were 27 (51.9%) male and 25 (48.1%) female patients. Mean age was 57.5 years (range 14-79). Median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 90 (range 50-100). Median follow-up time was 11 months (range 2-79). RESULTS: At analysis, 18 GBM patients (34.6%) were alive and 34 (65.4%) were dead. Two-year and 5-year survivals were 42% and 17.5%, respectively, with a median survival time (MST) of 16 months. Two-year survivals and MSTs for the implanted GBM patients compared to the RTOG database were as follows: 74% vs. 35% and 28 months vs. 17.9 months for class III; 32% vs. 15% and 16 months vs. 11.1 months for class IV; 29% vs. 6% and 11 months vs. 8.9 months for class V/VI. Mean implanted TV was 15.5 cc (range 0.8-78), which corresponds to a spherical implant diameter of 3.1 cm. Plotting survival as a function of 5-cc TV increments suggested a trend toward poorer survival as the implanted volume increases. The impact of incremental changes in TV on survival within a given RPA class of GBMs was compared to the RTOG database. Looking at absolute differences in MSTs: for classes III and IV, there was little effect of different TVs on survival; for class V/VI, a survival benefit to implantation was still seen at the target volume cutoff (TV > 25 cc). Within a given RPA class, no significant differences were found within class III; for class IV, the most significant difference was at 10 cc (p = 0.05); and for class V/VI, at 20 cc (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: For all GBM patients, an inverse relationship between implanted TV size and median survival is suggested by this study. However, when GBM patients are stratified using the RTOG's RPA criteria, the prognostic effect of implant volume disappears within each RPA survival class. At the critical volume of 25 cc, which approximates an implant of 5-cm diameter (upper implantation limit of many CNS brachytherapy protocols), the "poorest" prognosis GBM patients stratified by RPA still demonstrate a survival benefit with implant. We suggest that any GBM patient meeting brachytherapy recognized size criteria be considered for I-125 implant.     

Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for brain metastases

PURPOSE: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) previously developed three prognostic classes for brain metastases using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of a large database. These classes were based on Karnofsky performance status (KPS), primary tumor status, presence of extracranial system metastases, and age. An analysis of RTOG 91-04, a randomized study comparing two dose-fractionation schemes with a comparison to the established RTOG database, was considered important to validate the RPA classes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 445 patients were randomized on RTOG 91-04, a Phase III study of accelerated hyperfractionation versus accelerated fractionation. No difference was observed between the two treatment arms with respect to survival. Four hundred thirty-two patients were included in this analysis. The majority of the patients were under age 65, had KPS 70-80, primary tumor controlled, and brain-only metastases. The initial RPA had three classes, but only patients in RPA Classes I and II were eligible for RTOG 91-04. RESULTS: For RPA Class I, the median survival time was 6. 2 months and 7.1 months for 91-04 and the database, respectively. The 1-year survival was 29% for 91-04 versus 32% for the database. There was no significant difference in the two survival distributions (p = 0.72). For RPA Class II, the median survival time was 3.8 months for 91-04 versus 4.2 months for the database. The 1-year survival was 12% and 16% for 91-04 and the database, respectively (p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: This analysis indicates that the RPA classes are valid and reliable for historical comparisons. Both the RTOG and other clinical trial organizers should currently utilize this RPA classification as a stratification factor for clinical trials.     

Patterns of recurrence of malignant astrocytoma following stereotactic interstitial brachytherapy with iodine-125 implants.

The pattern of tumor recurrence was studied in a series of 68 patients who were treated with interstitial brachytherapy for malignant astrocytoma. Thirty-six patients had newly diagnosed tumors and were treated following surgery and external beam therapy, while 32 were treated for recurrent tumors. Recurrence pattern was determined using computed tomography at the time of clinical deterioration. Thirty-eight percent of tumor recurrence occurred within the original tumor margin and 50% occurred at the original site but extended beyond the initial margin. In all, 88.0% recurred at the initial tumor site, 71.4% being confined to within 2 cm of the pretreatment tumor borders while 6.0% recurred intracranially outside of the initial tumor margin. One patient recurred with spinal metastasis while two patients developed systemic metastases. The significance of these findings is discussed.     

Resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: an RTOG recursive partitioning analysis of ALA study patients

The benefit of cytoreductive surgery for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is unclear, and selection bias in past series has been observed. The 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) study investigated the influence of fluorescence-guided resections on outcome and generated an extensive database of GBM patients with optimized resections. We evaluated whether the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RTOG-RPA) would predict survival of these patients and whether there was any benefit from extensive resections depending on RPA class. A total of 243 per-protocol patients with newly diagnosed GBM were operated on with or without ALA and treated by radiotherapy. Postoperative MRI was obtained in all patients. Patients were allocated into RTOG-RPA classes III-V based on age, KPS, neurological condition, and mental status (as derived from the NIH Stroke Scale). Median overall survival among RPA classes III, IV, and V was 17.8, 14.7, and 10.7 months, respectively, with 2-year survival rates of 26%, 12%, and 7% (p = 0.0007). Stratified for degree of resection, survival of patients with complete resections was clearly longer in RPA classes IV and V (17.7 months vs. 12.9 months, p = 0.0015, and 13.7 months vs. 10.4 months, p = 0.0398; 2-year rates: 21.0% vs. 4.4% and 11.1% vs. 2.6%, respectively), but was not in the small subgroup of RPA class III patients (19.3 vs. 16.3 months, p = 0.14). Survival of patients from the ALA study is correctly predicted by the RTOG-RPA classes. Differences in survival depending on resection status, especially in RPA classes IV and V, support a causal influence of resection on survival.     

Post-operative treatment of malignant salivary gland tumours of the palate with iodine-125 brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Malignant minor salivary gland tumours are usually small and clinically indistinguishable from benign lesions. Surgery is the treatment of choice with post-operative radiotherapy for involved margins or unfavourable histology. We assessed the results of a series of such patients treated with iodine-125 brachytherapy in the form of a temporary applicator or implant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: There were nine patients with T1/T2 tumours of the hard and/or soft palate that had been excised. All had close or involved margins. Six were treated with a dental applicator alone, two with an applicator and additional I-125 seeds in tubes and one with an implant alone. The applicator consists of two layers of plastic made from a dental impression enclosing a predetermined number of I-125 seeds, 9-39, glued to one surface and a layer of ash metal to protect the tongue. It was inserted 1-3 months post-operatively and delivered 35-62 Gy, median 56 Gy, at 5-7 mm depth over 58-156 h, median 120 h, at 0.26-0.67 Gy/h, median 0.45 Gy/h. RESULTS: The patients have been followed up for 32-158 months, median 50 months, and there were no recurrences. The applicator was well tolerated. A confluent mucositis developed which lasted 3-4 weeks. One patient developed a mucosal ulcer which healed spontaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy is an effective way of delivering post-operative radiotherapy to the hard and soft palate in patients with malignant salivary gland tumours that have been incompletely excised or have unfavourable histology. Local control is excellent, treatment time is short and morbidity is minimal.     

Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for small-cell lung cancer-only brain metastases

PURPOSE: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) developed a prognostic classification based on a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of patient pretreatment characteristics from three completed brain metastases randomized trials. Clinical trials for patients with brain metastases generally exclude small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) cases. We hypothesize that the RPA classes are valid in the setting of SCLC brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of 154 SCLC patients with brain metastases treated between April 1983 and May 2005 was performed. RPA criteria used for class assignment were Karnofsky performance status (KPS), primary tumor status (PT), presence of extracranial metastases (ED), and age. RESULTS: Median survival was 4.9 months, with 4 patients (2.6%) alive at analysis. Median follow-up was 4.7 months (range, 0.3-40.3 months). Median age was 65 (range, 42-85 years). Median KPS was 70 (range, 40-100). Number of patients with controlled PT and no ED was 20 (13%) and with ED, 27 (18%); without controlled PT and ED, 34 (22%) and with ED, 73 (47%). RPA class distribution was: Class I: 8 (5%); Class II: 96 (62%); Class III: 51 (33%). Median survivals (in months) by RPA class were: Class I: 8.6; Class II: 4.2; Class III: 2.3 (p = 0.0023). CONCLUSIONS: Survivals for SCLC-only brain metastases replicate the results from the RTOG RPA classification. These classes are therefore valid for brain metastases from SCLC, support the inclusion of SCLC patients in future brain metastases trials, and may also serve as a basis for historical comparisons.     

Radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases: a multi-institutional analysis, stratified by the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis method

PURPOSE: To estimate the potential improvement in survival for patients with brain metastases, stratified by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class and treated with radiosurgery (RS) plus whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: An analysis of the RS databases of 10 institutions identified patients with brain metastates treated with RS and WBRT. Patients were stratified into 1 of 3 RPA classes. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and proportional hazard regression analysis. A comparison of survival by class was carried out with the RTOG results in similar patients receiving WBRT alone. RESULTS: Five hundred two patients were eligible (261 men and 241 women, median age 59 years, range 26-83). The overall median survival was 10.7 months. A higher Karnofsky performance status (p = 0.0001), a controlled primary (median survival = 11.6 vs. 8.8 months, p = 0.0023), absence of extracranial metastases (median survival 13.4 vs. 9.1 months, p = 0.0001), and lower RPA class (median survival 16.1 months for class I vs. 10.3 months for class II vs. 8.7 months for class III, p = 0.000007) predicted for improved survival. Gender, age, primary site, radiosurgery technique, and institution were not prognostic. The addition of RS boosted results in median survival (16.1, 10.3, and 8.7 months for classes I, II, and III, respectively) compared with the median survival (7.1, 4.2, and 2.3 months, p <0.05) observed in the RTOG RPA analysis for patients treated with WBRT alone. CONCLUSION: In the absence of randomized data, these results suggest that RS may improve survival in patients with BM. The improvement in survival does not appear to be restricted by class for well-selected patients.     

Stereotactic iodine-125 brachytherapy for the treatment of WHO grades II and III gliomas located in the central sulcus region

Background

Resection of gliomas located in eloquent brain areas remains a neurosurgical challenge. The reported incidence of transient or permanent neurological deficits after microsurgery in eloquent brain ranges 20%–100%, or 0%–47% among contemporary neurosurgical series. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of stereotactic brachytherapy (SBT) as a local treatment alternative to microsurgical resection for patients with gliomas in highly eloquent areas, located in the central sulcus region (CSR).

Method

Between 1997 and 2010, 60 patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grades II and III gliomas located in the CSR were treated with SBT (iodine-125 seeds; cumulative therapeutic dose, 50–65 Gy). Following SBT, WHO grade III glioma patients additionally received percutaneous radiotherapy (median boost dose, 25.2 Gy). We evaluated procedure-related complications, clinical outcome, and progression-free survival.

Results

Procedure-related mortality was zero. Within 30 days of SBT, 3 patients (5%) had transient neurological deficits, and 8 patients (13%) had temporarily increased seizure activity. One patient (1.6%) deteriorated permanently. Space-occupying cysts (6 patients) and radiation necrosis (1 patient) developed after a median of 38 months and required surgical intervention. Seizure activity, rated 12 months following SBT, decreased in 82% of patients (Engel classes I–III). Median progression-free survivals were 62.2 ± 19.7 months (grade II gliomas) and 26.1 ± 17.9 months (grade III gliomas).

Conclusions

Compared with microsurgical resection, SBT harbors a low risk of procedural complications, is minimally invasive, and seems to be an effective local treatment option for patients with inoperable, eloquent WHO grade II and III gliomas in the CSR. However, the value of SBT for treating gliomas still needs to be determined in prospective, randomized studies.     

External irradiation followed by an interstitial high activity iodine-125 implant "boost" in the initial treatment of malignant gliomas: NCOG study 6G-82-2.

Between January 1982 and January 1990, 107 patients with unifocal, circumscribed malignant gliomas participated in a non-randomized trial testing brachytherapy in their initial treatment. Focal external irradiation (6000 cGy) was combined with an implant of high-activity iodine-125 (5000-6000 cGy) and six courses of procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine. Of the 101 evaluable patients, 63 received implants. Of these, 29 had non-glioblastoma anaplastic gliomas, and 34 had glioblastoma multiforme. The other 38 did not receive implants, in most cases because radiation therapy failed to reduce the size of the tumor. The median survival was 165 weeks for all evaluable patients with non-glioblastoma anaplastic gliomas, 157 weeks for those with implants, 67 weeks for all evaluable glioblastoma patients, and 88 weeks for those with implants. Of the glioblastoma patients with implants, nine were alive after 2 years, and three were alive after 3 years. In each of the groups, nearly half the patients underwent reoperation for clinical deterioration, increasing steroid dependency, and increasing mass effect at the implantation site after 46.1 weeks (median) for glioblastoma multiforme and 41.3 weeks for non-glioblastoma patients. Karnofsky Performance Scores showed only a small decline in performance after brachytherapy. Patients receiving implants for non-glioblastoma anaplastic gliomas had a mean Karnofsky Performance Score of 91% (range 90-100%) after 1 month and 78% (range 60-100%) 30 months after brachytherapy. Those treated for glioblastoma multiforme had a mean Karnofsky Performance Score of 86% (range 60-100%) at 1 month and 75% (range 60-100%) at 24 months. The quality of life of treated patients appears to be satisfactory. On the basis of comparisons with previous studies, we conclude that a brachytherapy "boost" after external irradiation may be valuable for some patients with glioblastoma multiforme but not for those with non-glioblastoma anaplastic gliomas.     

Chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant gliomas

Malignant gliomas are one of the most difficult tumors to treat, with only modest advances being made in the past few decades. Surgery and radiation have had the greatest impact, increasing survival. Chemotherapy modestly increases survival. The use of chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant gliomas is the focus of this paper and the more commonly used agents at diagnosis and relapse are reviewed. Since most patients fail first-, second- and even third-line agents that are commercially available, some of the more relevant new biological compounds will also be discussed. As treatments for brain tumors evolve, it is likely that optimal therapies will come from combination therapies that incorporate target-specific and chemotherapeutic agents.     

Chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant gliomas

Malignant gliomas are one of the most difficult tumors to treat, with only modest advances being made in the past few decades. Surgery and radiation have had the greatest impact, increasing survival. Chemotherapy modestly increases survival. The use of chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant gliomas is the focus of this paper and the more commonly used agents at diagnosis and relapse are reviewed. Since most patients fail first-, second- and even third-line agents that are commercially available, some of the more relevant new biological compounds will also be discussed. As treatments for brain tumors evolve, it is likely that optimal therapies will come from combination therapies that incorporate target-specific and chemotherapeutic agents.     

Changing boundaries in the treatment of malignant gliomas

Malignant gliomas are still among the most lethal and difficult tumors to treat; even the most intensive combinations of radio- and chemotherapy are not curative and yield only a modest impact on survival for most of these patients, as long-term survivors are less than 10%. There is a major need for new chemotherapeutic drugs and alternative therapeutic modalities. This review aims to define the best standard treatment in the common clinical practice and also summarizes the most promising lines of investigational research in the field of neuro-oncology, which will probably offer new and long-awaited valid therapy options for brain tumor patients.     

Changing boundaries in the treatment of malignant gliomas

Malignant gliomas are still among the most lethal and difficult tumors to treat; even the most intensive combinations of radio- and chemotherapy are not curative and yield only a modest impact on survival for most of these patients, as long-term survivors are less than 10%. There is a major need for new chemotherapeutic drugs and alternative therapeutic modalities. This review aims to define the best standard treatment in the common clinical practice and also summarizes the most promising lines of investigational research in the field of neuro-oncology, which will probably offer new and long-awaited valid therapy options for brain tumor patients.     

New chemotherapy options for the treatment of malignant gliomas.

Chemotherapy remains part of the treatment triad that includes surgery and radiation therapy for the management of malignant gliomas. In recent years there has been an increased understanding of the molecular pathways of malignant transformation. Based on this research, new drugs have been evaluated, with specific cellular targets in mind that can be modified or inhibited. Many of these agents are now being tested in phase I and II clinical trials and have shown some promising results. Clearly, not all patients with malignant gliomas respond equally to chemotherapy. Recent evidence suggests that certain molecular markers may predict chemosensitivity in some tumor types, particularly anaplastic oligodendroglioma. This article reviews recent trends in the use of chemotherapy and clinical trials of new therapies for adults with malignant gliomas.     

碘125粒子植入术联合去甲斑蝥酸钠治疗原发性肝癌

目的探讨碘125粒子植入术联合去甲斑蝥酸钠治疗原发性肝癌的临床疗效。方法将枣庄市肿瘤医院2010年6月至2015年6月期间收治的120例原发性肝癌随机分成两组,均行碘125粒子植入治疗,其中60例于术后加用去甲斑蝥酸钠静脉滴注14 d,作为治疗组;另60例患者术后常规对症支持治疗,作为对照组。随访1~60个月。术后30、60 d分别检测两组患者各项生化、免疫指标。结果治疗组临床缓解率高,血清血管内皮生长因子(vascular endothelial growth factor,VEGF)、甲胎蛋白(AFP)降低显著,肝功能明显改善,T淋巴细胞亚群CD4、CD8检测指标高于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论碘125粒子植入术联合去甲斑蝥酸钠治疗原发性肝癌,临床疗效显著,值得进一步研究。