Risk profiles to predict PSA relapse-free survival for patients undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Combined risk profiles are helpful in assessing the likelihood of prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival (PSA-RFS) for patients with localized prostate cancer. This retrospective analysis reports the 5-year biochemical outcome of a large cohort of patients according to prognostic factors and risk profiles for patients undergoing ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy (TIPPB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven hundred seventeen consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated between June 1992 and November 1997 underwent TIPPB. Palladium-103 (103Pd) (n = 539) or iodine-125 (125I) (n = 178) sources were utilized to a prescribed dose of 120 Gy and 144 Gy, respectively. One hundred eleven patients received combined external-beam irradiation (41.4 or 45 Gy) and TIPPB (103Pd, 90 Gy, and 125I, 108 Gy). One hundred twelve patients received androgen ablation therapy in advance of TIPPB. Patients were grouped into risk profiles based on pretreatment factors that consisted of PSA < or = 10 and Gleason score < or = 6. Patients meeting both criteria were classified as favorable (n = 334). Those not fulfilling one criteria were classified as intermediate risk (n = 261), and those not fulfilling two criteria were classified as unfavorable risk (n = 261). PSA-RFS was calculated based on the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus conference definition of PSA failure. The median follow-up was 41 months (range, 14-82 months). RESULTS: The actuarial PSA-RFS survival at 5 years was 82%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified PSA and Gleason score as highly significant factors predicting for biochemical outcome. Hazard risk ratios using a nadir definition of the PSA as < or = 1.0 ng/mL and < or = 0.5 ng/mL were each significant predictors of outcome with the 0.5 ng/mL nadir level only slightly better (risk ratio for nadir < or = 1.0 = 2.78; risk ratio for nadir < or = 0.5 = 3.57). Favorable-risk patients had a 5-year actuarial PSA-RFS of 93%, whereas intermediate-risk and unfavorable-risk groups had 5-year PSA-RFSs of 77% and 62%, respectively. Four hundred ninety-three patients underwent brachytherapy without external-beam irradiation or androgen ablation. From this group, the 5-year PSA-RFSs for the favorable-risk, intermediate-risk, and unfavorable-risk patients were 92%, 74%, and 55%, respectively. DISCUSSION: This retrospective study examining TIPPB demonstrated excellent 5-year actuarial PSA-RFS rates. The assignment of risk profiles based on the results of multivariate analysis of prognostic factors identifies the expected PSA-RFS for patients undergoing TIPPB.     

Four-year biochemical outcome after radioimmunoguided transperineal brachytherapy for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate 4-year biochemical outcomes for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent radioimmunoguided (Prostascint) permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty patients with clinical T1C-T3A NxM0 prostate cancer underwent ProstaScint-guided prostate brachytherapy using either (103)Pd or (125)I between February 1997 and December 2000. Sixty-seven patients underwent prostate brachytherapy alone, whereas 13 patients received neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation before implantation. Risk factors (RF) included PSA >10, Stage >or=T2b, and Gleason grade >or=7. Sixty patients had low-risk disease (0 RF), 17 were intermediate risk (1 RF), and 3 were high risk (2 RF). Biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) was calculated using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus criteria, a PSA cutoff of 1.0 ng/mL, and a PSA cutoff of 0.5 ng/mL. RESULTS: Four-year bDFS for the entire cohort was 97.4% using the ASTRO consensus criteria. Low-risk patients (60) had a 4-year bDFS of 100%; intermediate- and high-risk patients (20 patients) were 89.2%. The hormonally na?ve group (67 patients) had a 4-year bDFS of 96.9% and a median PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL. Median time to nadir was 19.8 months (range: 1.9-53.2 months). For the neoadjuvant hormonal therapy group (13 patients), ASTRO-defined bDFS was 100%. Overall, 85.2% of patients had a posttreatment PSA 相似文献   

Biochemical outcomes after prostate brachytherapy with 5-year minimal follow-up: importance of patient selection and implant quality

PURPOSE: A prostate brachytherapy program was initiated in 1990, when comparatively little was known of the relative importance of disease- and treatment-related factors on outcome. Patients treated during the first 6 years of the program were analyzed to determine the value of patient selection and implant quality on biochemical control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We treated 243 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer with radioactive seed implantation and underwent 1-month CT-based dosimetric analysis. Follow-up ranged from 61 to 135 months (median 75). The Gleason score was < or =6 in 78% (n = 189), 7 in 14% (n = 35), and 8-10 in 8% (n = 19). The initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was < or =10 ng/mL in 61% (n = 149), 10.1-20 ng/mL in 26% (n = 63), and >20 ng/mL in 13% (n = 31). The disease stage was T2a or less in 49% (n = 120), and Stage T2b-T2c in 51% (n = 123). A real-time ultrasound-guided technique was used with (125)I (n = 138) and (103)Pd (n = 105) isotopes. No patient underwent external beam radiotherapy as part of their primary treatment. Of the 243 patients, 60% also received hormonal ablation for at least 3 months before and 2-3 months after seed implantation. All patients included underwent a 1-month CT-based dosimetric analysis. The implant dose was defined as the dose delivered to 90% of the prostate volume on postimplant dosimetry (D(90)). On the basis of prior dose-response analyses, patients were retrospectively grouped into optimal D(90) ((125)I > or =140 Gy Task Group 43 or (103)Pd >/=100 Gy) and suboptimal D(90) ( (125)I <140 Gy or (103)Pd <100 Gy) dose groups. Biochemical failure was defined using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology definition. RESULTS: Disease-related factors, including initial PSA level, Gleason score, and stage, were significant predictors of biochemical failure. The actuarial 8-year freedom from biochemical failure (bFFF) rate was 80% for those with a PSA level < or =10 ng/mL, 86% for PSA 10.1-20 ng/mL, and 45% for PSA >20 ng/mL (p = 0.0019). Patients with a Gleason score of < or =6 had an 8-year bFFF rate of 81% vs. 67% for those with Gleason score 7 and 53% for those with Gleason score 8-10 (p = 0.0003). Patients with Stage T2a or less had an 8-year bFFF rate of 85% compared with 69% for those with Stage T2b-T2c (p = 0.013). The 8-year bFFF rate was 88% for low-risk patients (Stage T2a or less, Gleason score < or =6, and initial PSA level < or =10 ng/mL; n = 75), 81% for moderate-risk patients (Stage T2b or Gleason score 7 or initial PSA level >10.1-20 ng/mL; n = 70), and 65% for high-risk patients (two or more moderate-risk features or Gleason score > or =8 or initial PSA level >20 ng/mL; n = 98; p = 0.0009). Patients with optimal dose implants (n = 145) had an 8-year bFFF rate of 82% compared with 68% for those with suboptimal dose implants (n = 98; p = 0.007). Hormonal therapy did not significantly affect biochemical failure (p = 0.27). In multivariate analysis, the statistically significant variables included initial PSA level (p <0.0001), Gleason score (p = 0.024), and dose group (p = 0.046). Because our current practice limits implantation alone to low-risk patients, an analysis of this subgroup was undertaken to validate the importance of dose. In the optimal dose group, low-risk patients had an 8-year bFFF rate of 94% vs. 75% for the low-risk patients in the suboptimal dose group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: With minimal follow-up of 5 years, these data continue to support the use of implantation alone in low-risk prostate cancer patients and demonstrate the importance of implant quality (dose) in achieving optimal outcomes. Low-risk patients who receive an optimal dose implant have a 94% bFFF rate at 8 years.     

Role of hormonal therapy in the management of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer treated with permanent radioactive seed implantation

PURPOSE: To study the impact of hormonal therapy (HTx) on intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer treated with permanent radioactive seed implantation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with Stage T1b-T3bN0 prostate cancer, and Gleason score > or = 7 or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level >10 ng/mL were treated with seed implantation with or without HTx. Their disease was defined as intermediate risk (PSA 10-20, Gleason score 7, or Stage T2b) or high risk (two or more intermediate criteria, or PSA >20 ng/mL, Gleason score 8-10, or Stage T2c-T3). The median follow-up for 201 eligible patients was 42 months (range 18-110). Biochemical failure was defined as a rising PSA >1.0 ng/mL. Pretreatment disease characteristics, implant dose, and HTx were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: HTx significantly improved 5-year actuarial freedom from biochemical failure rate, 79% vs. 54% without HTx. In addition, high-dose, PSA < or = 15 ng/mL, intermediate risk, and Stage T2a or lower significantly improved outcome in the univariate analyses. HTx was the most significant predictor of 5-year actuarial freedom from biochemical failure (p <0.0001) in a multivariate analysis. The best outcome was in the intermediate-risk patients treated with a high implant dose and HTx, resulting in a 4-year actuarial freedom from biochemical failure rate of 94%. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective review, HTx improved outcome in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy. HTx was the most important prognostic factor in the univariate and multivariate analyses.     

Brachytherapy with transperineal (125)Iodine seeds for localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To analyze the treatment results of transperineal (125)Iodine seeds in localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1985 and 1996, 102 patients with T1-T2 N0 prostate cancer were treated with transperineal (125)Iodine seed implants at the Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam. Tumours were classified as T1c in four patients, T2a in 73 patients and T2b in 25 patients. The mean pre-treatment PSA was 17 ng/ml. The (125)Iodine seeds were implanted transperineally under transrectal ultrasound guidance. The mean prostate volume was 31 ml (range 15-48 ml). An average of 49 seeds (range 29-74) was implanted. The dose to the periphery of the prostate was 160 Gy. Until 1988, 27 patients had additional external pelvic irradiation to a dose of 40 Gy in 20 daily fractions of 2 Gy. RESULTS: The 5- and 7-year actuarial survival rates were 77 and 63%, respectively (median 102 months). Ten patients (9.5%) died from prostate cancer. The 5- and 7-year clinical progression rates were 12 and 17%, respectively. Biochemical failure rates at 5 and 7 years were 39 and 44%, respectively. Age, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine, differentiation grade, additional treatment, staging procedure, number of seeds, prostate volume, treatment period and PSA were analyzed as prognostic factors. Only pre-treatment PSA was a prognosticator of clinical and biochemical outcome but not of survival. Biochemical control at 6 years varied from 30% for pre-treatment PSA values higher than 20 ng/ml to 95% for values < or =8 ng/ml. Forty-one out of 49 patients who were sexually active before brachytherapy maintained sexual function during the follow-up. Complete urinary incontinence occurred in one patient. No rectal complications were seen in patients receiving brachytherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Transperineal (125)Iodine seeds brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer achieves a good clinical control and overall survival with acceptable late toxicity. Biochemical failure was strongly correlated to the pre-treatment PSA value.     

Interim report of image-guided conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer: the William Beaumont phase II dose-escalating trial

PURPOSE: We analyzed our institution's experience treating patients with unfavorable prostate cancer in a prospective Phase II dose-escalating trial of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) integrated with conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts. This interim report discusses treatment outcome and prognostic factors using this treatment approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From November 1991 through February 1998, 142 patients with unfavorable prostate cancer were prospectively treated in a dose-escalating trial with pelvic EBRT in combination with outpatient HDR brachytherapy at William Beaumont Hospital. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >/= 10.0 ng/ml, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b or higher. All patients received pelvic EBRT to a median total dose of 46.0 Gy. Pelvic EBRT was integrated with ultrasound-guided transperineal conformal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. From 1991 to 1995, 58 patients underwent three conformal interstitial HDR implants during the first, second, and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. After October 1995, 84 patients received two interstitial implants during the first and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. The dose delivered via interstitial brachytherapy was escalated from 5.50 Gy to 6.50 Gy for each implant in those patients receiving three implants, and subsequently, from 8.25 Gy to 9.50 Gy per fraction in those patients receiving two implants. To improve implant quality and reduce operator dependency, an on-line, image-guided interactive dose optimization program was utilized during each HDR implant. No patient received hormonal therapy unless treatment failure was documented. The median follow-up was 2.1 years (range: 0.2-7.2 years). Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition. RESULTS: The pretreatment PSA level was >/= 10.0 ng/ml in 51% of patients. The biopsy Gleason score was >/= 7 in 58% of cases, and 75% of cases were clinical stage T2b or higher. Despite the high frequency of these poor prognostic factors, the actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% at 2 years and 63% at 5 years. On multivariate analysis, a higher pretreatment PSA level, higher Gleason score, higher PSA nadir level, and shorter time to nadir were associated with biochemical failure. In the entire population, 14 patients (10%) experienced clinical failure at a median interval of 1.7 years (range: 0.2-4.5 years) after completing RT. The 5-year actuarial clinical failure rate was 22%. The 5-year actuarial rates of local failure and distant metastasis were 16% and 14%, respectively. For all patients, the 5-year disease-free survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival rates were 89%, 95%, and 96%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial rate of RTOG Grade 3 late complications was 9% with no patient experiencing Grade 4 or 5 acute or late toxicity. CONCLUSION: Pelvic EBRT in combination with image-guided conformal HDR brachytherapy boosts appears to be an effective treatment for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer with minimal associated morbidity. Our dose-escalating trial will continue.     

Combined modality treatment in the management of high-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE: The efficacy of a multimodality protocol using neoadjuvant and concomitant hormonal therapy, brachytherapy, and three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy (RT) in high-risk prostate cancer was evaluated using biochemical outcomes and posttreatment biopsy results. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between February 1994 and November 1999, 132 high-risk patients were treated with combined hormonal therapy (9 months), permanent radioactive seed brachytherapy, and external beam RT, with follow-up ranging from 36 to 88 months (median, 50 months). The eligibility criteria were any of the following: Gleason score 8-10, initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level >20 ng/mL, clinical Stage T2c-T3, or positive seminal vesicle biopsy, or two or more of the following: Gleason score 7, PSA level >10-20 ng/mL, or Stage T2b. Twenty percent of patients had a positive seminal vesicle biopsy before therapy. Negative laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissections were performed in 44% of patients. RESULTS: The actuarial overall freedom from PSA failure rate was 86% at 5 years. The freedom from PSA failure rate at 5 years was 97% for those with a Gleason score of < or =6 (35 of 36), 85% for a Gleason score of 7 (50 of 59), and 76% for a Gleason score of 8-10 (28 of 37; p = 0.03). A trend was noted toward worse outcomes in seminal vesicle biopsy-positive patients, with a 5-year freedom from PSA failure rate of 74% vs. 89% for all other patients (p = 0.06). Posttreatment prostate biopsies were performed in 47 patients and were negative in 96% at the first biopsy and 100% at the last biopsy. CONCLUSION: Trimodality therapy with androgen suppression, brachytherapy, and external beam RT for high-risk prostate cancer results in excellent biochemical and pathologically confirmed local control.     

Actuarial disease-free survival after prostate cancer brachytherapy using interactive techniques with biplane ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of interactive transperineal brachytherapy under biplane ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance in patients with localized prostate cancer.Methods and Materials: Brachytherapy using ¹²⁵I or ¹⁰³Pd radioactive seeds either alone or in combination with adjunctive external beam radiotherapy (XRT) was administered to 490 patients at a single institution. Post-treatment follow-up included clinical assessment of disease status, assays of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and documentation of treatment-related symptoms and complications.Results: Actuarial disease-free survival at 5 yr was 79% (95% CI, 71–85%), and the 5-yr actuarial rate of local control was 98% (95% CI, 94–99%). Post-treatment PSA nadir and pretreatment PSA level were found to be significant predictors of disease-free survival. In patients with a PSA nadir < 0.5 ng/ml, 5-yr disease-free survival was 93% (95% CI, 84–97%), compared with 25% (95% CI, 5–53%) in patients whose PSA nadir was 0.5–1.0 ng/ml and 15% (95% CI, 3–38) in patients with a PSA nadir > 1.0 ng/ml. Brachytherapy was well tolerated with few post-treatment complications.Conclusion: A broad range of patients with localized prostate cancer can benefit from transperineal brachytherapy with minimal morbidity. A post-treatment PSA nadir below 0.5 ng/ml provides a useful prognostic indicator of favorable long-term outcome.     

Matched-pair analysis of conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost versus external-beam radiation therapy alone for locally advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We performed a matched-pair analysis to compare our institution's experience in treating locally advanced prostate cancer with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone to EBRT in combination with conformal interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts (EBRT + HDR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1991 to 1998, 161 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were prospectively treated with EBRT + HDR at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible for study entry: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >/= 10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b to T3c. Pelvic EBRT (46.0 Gy) was supplemented with three (1991 through 1995) or two (1995 through 1998) ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. The brachytherapy dose was escalated from 5.50 to 10.50 Gy per implant. Each of the 161 EBRT + HDR patients was randomly matched with a unique EBRT-alone patient. Patients were matched according to PSA level, Gleason score, T stage, and follow-up duration. The median PSA follow-up was 2.5 years for both EBRT + HDR and EBRT alone. RESULTS: EBRT + HDR patients demonstrated significantly lower PSA nadir levels (median, 0.4 ng/mL) compared with those receiving EBRT alone (median, 1.1 ng/mL). The 5-year biochemical control rates for EBRT + HDR versus EBRT-alone patients were 67% versus 44%, respectively (P <.001). On multivariate analyses, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, T stage, and the use of EBRT alone were significantly associated with biochemical failure. Those patients in both treatment groups who experienced biochemical failure had a lower 5-year cause-specific survival rate than patients who were biochemically controlled (84% v 100%; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Locally advanced prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT + HDR demonstrate improved biochemical control compared with those who are treated with conventional doses of EBRT alone.     

Posttreatment prostate-specific antigen nadir highly predictive of distant failure and death from prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To link posttreatment biochemical profiles to distant failure and cause-specific survival by assessing the relationship between posttreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir and PSA doubling time (PSADT) with these outcome measures. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 615 men were treated at the Fox Chase Cancer Center between April 1989 and December 1995 with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy alone (median dose 73 Gy). The median follow-up was 64 months (range 2-135). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate the rates of biochemical control, freedom from distant metastasis (FDM), and cause-specific survival. Multivariate predictors of outcome were assessed using stepwise Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the predictors of improved biochemical control were a lower PSA nadir (p <0.0001), lower pretreatment PSA level (p <0.0001), Gleason score of 2-6 (p = 0.001), Stage T1-T2a tumors (p = 0.03), and higher RT dose (p = 0.02). The predictors of improved FDM were a lower PSA nadir (p <0.0001), longer interval to nadir from start of treatment (p = 0.0002), Gleason score of 2-6 (p = 0.005), androgen deprivation for biochemical failure (p = 0.001), and Stage T1-T2a tumors (p = 0.01). The predictors of improved cause-specific survival were a lower PSA nadir (p = 0.006) and longer interval to nadir from the start of treatment (p = 0.03). The 8-year FDM rate was 96%, 89%, and 61% for PSA nadir values of 2.0 ng/mL (p <0.0001), respectively. The 8-year cause-specific survival rate was 97%, 96%, and 78% for posttreatment PSA nadir values of 2.0 ng/mL (p <0.0001), respectively. For patients with sufficient PSA follow-up for PSADT calculations (n = 136), multivariate analysis of FDM from the time of biochemical failure demonstrated that androgen deprivation (p = 0.001), longer PSADT (p = 0.003), lower PSA nadir (p = 0.02), and longer interval to nadir from start of treatment (p = 0.04) were independent predictors of improved FDM. CONCLUSION: This is the first study, to our knowledge, to demonstrate the overwhelming predictive power of posttreatment PSA nadir for distant failure and death from prostate cancer. It is also the first study, to our knowledge, to demonstrate a strong association between posttreatment PSADT and distant failure. The results provide new information regarding disease progression as a function of posttreatment PSA profiles (time to achieve nadir from start of treatment, nadir, and PSADT) and the timing of androgen deprivation for biochemical relapse. This study may be used for the early identification of patients at high risk of distant metastasis and who may be directed to applicable systemic treatment clinical trials.     

Predictors of mortality after androgen-deprivation therapy in patients with rapidly rising prostate-specific antigen levels after local therapy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The authors identified biochemical and pathologic factors that were associated significantly with prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in men who had rapidly rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after they received local treatment. METHODS: The study population consisted of 67 patients who had a PSA doubling time (DT) < or =6 months after radical prostatectomy (n = 50 patients) or external beam radiation therapy (n = 17 patients) for localized prostate cancer. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate whether the interval to PSA failure, pre-ADT PSA DT, PSA level at the time of ADT initiation, time to PSA nadir, PSA nadir after 8 months on ADT, and Gleason score were associated significantly with the time to PCSM 8 months after the initiation of ADT. RESULTS.: A PSA nadir >0.2 ng/mL (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 8.0; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.7-38.7; P = 0.009) and a Gleason score > or =8 (adjusted HR, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.3-20.6; P = 0.02) were associated significantly with a short time to PCSM. The cumulative incidence estimates of 3-year PCSM were 5.8% versus 50.9% for patients with a PSA nadir < or =0.2 ng/mL versus >0.2 ng/mL, respectively, and 10.8% versus 35.8% for patients who had tumors with a Gleason score < or =7 versus > or =8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS.: Among men with a PSA DT < or =6 months, both a PSA nadir >0.2 ng/mL after ADT and a Gleason score > or =8 cancer identified men who were at high risk for PCSM. These men would be ideal candidates for Phase III studies that evaluate the impact on survival of new systemic therapies for prostate cancer.     

Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/ml

OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 ng/ml are at high risk of progression after radical prostatectomy. Comparison has seldom been made between the outcomes of patients with PSA 20.1-50 ng/ml and those with PSA >50 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of these two groups. METHODS: From 1993 to 2002, 60 prostate cancer patients receiving radical prostatectomy were enrolled in this study. Thirty-seven patients with PSA 20.1-50 ng/ml were assigned to Group I. Twenty-three patients with PSA >50 ng/ml were assigned to Group II. Preoperatively, Group II had greater PSA and PSA density than Group I (P < 0.0001). Group II had higher biopsy Gleason score and clinical stage than Group I (P < 0.05). Pathological categories and outcomes of both groups were compared. RESULTS: Group II had higher Gleason score and tumor volume than Group I (P < 0.05). The incidence of organ-confined diseases was 29.7% in Group I and 0% in Group II (P < 0.05). Group II had higher incidence of extracapsular tumor extension, positive surgical margin and lymph node involvement than Group I (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative PSA >0.01 ng/ml and PSA failure were higher in Group II than Group I (P < 0.05). Need for adjuvant treatment and death from prostate cancer was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with PSA >50 ng/ml had a poorer prognosis than patients with PSA 20.1-50 ng/ml. Those with PSA >50 ng/ml had shorter freedom from PSA failure survivals than those with PSA 20.1-50 ng/ml (P = 0.004). Classification of high-risk prostate patients into two sub-groups with PSA 20.1-50 ng/ml and PSA >50 ng/ml should be considered.     

Analysis of prostate-specific antigen bounce after I permanent seed implant for localised prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To report on the incidence of benign prostate-specific antigen bounce following permanent I(125) prostate brachytherapy, to describe the associations in our population and review the relationship of bounce to subsequent biochemical failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2000 to May 2005, 374 patients with localised prostate cancer were treated with I(125) permanent prostate brachytherapy at a single institution. A prospectively collected database was used to identify cases of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce, defined as a rise of 0.2 ng/ml above an initial PSA nadir with subsequent decline to or below that nadir without treatment. The patients who received neo-adjuvant or adjuvant hormone manipulation were excluded. Biochemical failure was determined using the both the ASTRO consensus definition and Phoenix (nadir +2 ng/mL) definition. RESULTS: Two hundred and five patients were identified with a median follow-up of 45 months (24-85). PSA bounce was noted in 79 (37%) men, occurring at a median of 14.8 months (1.7-40.6) following implant. The median peak PSA was 1.8 ng/ml (0.4-7.4) with a bounce magnitude of 0.91 ng/ml (0.2-5.8). When pre- and post-implant factors were assessed for association to bounce, only younger age was statistically significant (p=0.002). The threshold for biochemical failure as defined by the ASTRO consensus definition (1997) was met in 4 (5%) patients after experiencing bounce as opposed to 19 (15%) non-bounce patients (p=0.01). The threshold for Phoenix (nadir +2 ng/mL) was met in 6 (7.5%) patients following bounce versus 22 (17%) of non-bounce patients (p=0.003). Both definitions are prone to false positive calls during bounce. Median PSA velocity during the bounce was 0.08 ng/mL/month (0.02-0.98) and was statistically significantly lower than the median velocity prior to the Phoenix biochemical failure at 0.28 ng/mL/month (0.07-2.04) (p=0.0005). CONCLUSION: PSA bounce is a common finding in our population and is associated with a lower rate of subsequent biochemical failure. The noted differences in PSA velocity will require verification in a future analysis to reduce the influence of median follow-up on this finding. Patients should be advised of the potential of bounce in PSA follow-up after permanent I(125) prostate brachytherapy and physicians involved in follow-up of prostate brachytherapy patients should be aware of this phenomenon, allowing them to commit to appropriate PSA surveillance, avoiding the premature and inappropriate initiation of salvage therapy during PSA bounce.     

Multi-institutional analysis of long-term outcome for stages T1-T2 prostate cancer treated with permanent seed implantation

PURPOSE: To assess long-term prostate-specific antigen (PSA) outcome after permanent prostate brachytherapy (BT) and identify predictors of improved disease-free survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eleven institutions combined data on 2,693 patients treated with permanent interstitial BT monotherapy for T1-T2 prostate cancer. Of these patients, 1,831 (68%) were treated with I-125 (median dose, 144 Gy) and 862 (32%) were treated with Pd-103 (median dose, 130 Gy). Criteria for inclusion were: available pre-BT PSA, BT > or =5 years before data submission, BT between 1988-1998, and no androgen deprivation before failure. The median follow-up was 63 months. RESULTS: Among patients where the I-125 dose to 90% of the prostate (D90) was > or =130 Gy, the 8-year PSA relapse-free survival (PRFS) was 93% compared with 76% for those with lower D90 dose levels (p < 0.001). A multivariable analysis identified tumor stage (p = 0.002), Gleason score (p < 0.001), pretreatment PSA level (p < 0.001), treatment year (p = 0.001), and the isotope used (p = 0.004) as pretreatment and treatment variables associated with PRFS. When restricted to patients with available postimplantation dosimetric information, D90 emerged as a significant predictor of biochemical outcome (p = 0.01), and isotope was not significant. The 8-year PRFS was 92%, 86%, 79%, and 67%, respectively, for patients with PSA nadir values of 0-0.49, 0.5-0.99, 1.0-1.99, and >2.0 ng/mL (p < 0.001). Among patients free of biochemical relapse at 8 years, the median nadir level was 0.1 ng/mL, and 90% of these patients achieved a nadir PSA level <0.6 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Outcome after permanent BT for prostatic cancer relates to tumor stage, Gleason score, pretreatment PSA, BT year, and post-BT dosimetric quality. PSA nadir < or =0.5 ng/mL was particularly associated with durable long-term PSA disease-free survival. The only controllable factor to impact on long-term outcome was the D90 which is a reflection of implant quality.     

Predicting prostate specific antigen failure after radical retropubic prostatectomy for T1c prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Clinicopathological data were reviewed to find a predictor of prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure in Taiwanese patients who had received radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for stage T1c prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive men who underwent RRP for stage T1c PC were included. The clinical end point was PSA failure (PSA >0.2 ng/ml). Preoperative PSA, free-to-total PSA ratio, prostate volume, PSA density, transrectal sextant biopsy and whole mount of RRP parameters were analyzed for their ability to predict postoperative PSA failure. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 55 patients developed PSA failure during the follow-up period. Those with PSA failure had higher PSA, higher percentage of cancer in biopsies and higher biopsy Gleason score than the freedom from PSA failure group (all P < 0.05). The PSA failure group had higher pathology Gleason score and a higher incidence of extracapsular tumor extension than the freedom from PSA failure group (all P < 0.05). The PSA failure group had a larger tumor volume and higher incidence of combined peripheral lobe with transitional lobe involvement than the freedom from PSA failure group (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that the predictors for PSA failure after RRP were biopsy Gleason score > or =6, tumor volume > or =2.5 ml and PSA > or =10 ng/ml. CONCLUSION: The single most significant predictor for PSA failure in T1c PC patients after RRP was tumor volume > or =2.5 ml.     

Practical application of biochemical failure definitions: what to do and when to do it

PURPOSE: The posttreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) profile can often be difficult to interpret after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. We performed an extensive analysis of post-radiotherapy PSA measurements to determine the clinical significance of biochemical failure (BF) and the correlation of BF with clinical failure (CF) and cause-specific death (CSD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1987 and 1997, 727 patients with clinical stage T1-T3 N0 M0 prostate cancer were treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy at William Beaumont Hospital and had at least five post-radiotherapy PSA levels and did not receive hormonal therapy for post-radiotherapy PSA elevations only (before evidence of CF). All patients received external beam radiotherapy alone (no adjuvant hormonal therapy) to a median total prostate dose of 66.6 Gy. More than 20 BF definitions were tested for their correlation with CF (any local failure or distant metastasis) and CSD. All BF definitions were tested for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative value of predicting subsequent CF and CSD. The median follow-up was 5.0 years. RESULTS: Three consecutive PSA rises yielded a 73% sensitivity, 76% specificity, and 75% overall accuracy for predicting CF. The 10-year CF rate (from the completion of radiotherapy) for those 251 patients demonstrating three consecutive rises (BF) was 64% vs. 14% for those patients who did not have three rises (biochemically controlled). Defining BF as a post-nadir increase to >or=3 ng/ml above the nadir yielded the highest accuracy of 87%. In addition, this definition also seemed to provide the greatest separation in CF rates: 82% for BF vs. 5% for biochemically controlled at 10 years after radiotherapy. CF rates were also calculated from the date of BF (e.g., date of third rise). The CF rates at 6 months and 2 years after the third PSA rise were 9% and 27%, respectively. The CF rates at 6 months and 2 years after an increase to >or=3 ng/ml above the nadir were 23% and 54%, respectively. Once a patient was classified as a BF, regardless of the BF definition, the CF rate varied markedly, depending on the pretreatment characteristics. For each BF definition, younger age at diagnosis, higher pretreatment PSA, and higher Gleason score independently predicted for CF after BF on Cox multiple regression analysis. For instance, patients with a pretreatment PSA <4.0 ng/ml demonstrated an 11% CF rate at 2 years after the third PSA rise vs. 46% after three rises with a pretreatment PSA >or=20.0 ng/ml. Similarly, patients with Gleason 2-4 had a 2-year CF rate of only 3% after a nadir >or=1.0 ng/ml vs. 47% for Gleason 8-10 at 2 years after a nadir >or=1.0 ng/ml. Although the CF rate also coincided with pretreatment characteristics when using >or=3 ng/ml above the nadir, CF rates remained high even for low-risk patients (e.g., 2-year CF of 48% for PSA <10.0 ng/ml, 41% for Gleason 2-4). In addition, a shorter time interval from nadir to nadir + 1 ng/ml or from nadir to nadir + 3 ng/ml (corresponding to a steeper slope in the PSA profile) independently predicted for CF. CONCLUSION: Once the post-radiotherapy PSA profile reaches >or=3 ng/ml above the nadir, there is a high risk of clinical failure within a relatively short time period, for which treatment intervention may be considered, regardless of pretreatment characteristics. After a nadir >or=1.0 ng/ml or three consecutive rises, some patients (especially with low-risk pretreatment characteristics) may be considered for further PSA observation before treatment intervention.     

Relationship between prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen nadir, and biochemical control

PURPOSE: In patients treated with definitive three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for localized prostatic adenocarcinoma, we sought to evaluate the relationship between pretreatment prostate gland volume and posttreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir, as well as the relationship of prostate volume and PSA nadir with biochemical control (bNED). Two subgroups were studied: favorable (PSA <10 ng/mL, Gleason score 2-6, and T1-T2A) and unfavorable (one or more: PSA >/=10 ng/mL, Gleason score 7-10, T2B-T3). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 655 men (n = 271 favorable and 384 unfavorable) were treated with 3D-CRT alone between May 1989 and November 1997. All patients had information on prostate volume and a minimum follow-up of 24 months (median 56, range 24-126). Of the 655 men, 481 (n = 230 favorable and 251 unfavorable) remained bNED at time of analysis, with biochemical failure defined in accordance with the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. Factors analyzed for predictors of bNED included pretreatment prostate volume, posttreatment PSA nadir, pretreatment PSA, palpation T stage, Gleason score, center of the prostate dose, and perineural invasion (PNI). We also analyzed pretreatment prostate volume and its correlation to prognostic factors. For bNED patients, the relationship between PSA nadir and prostate volume was evaluated. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, prostate volume (p = 0.04) and palpation T stage (p = 0.02) were the only predictors of biochemical failure in the favorable group. On multivariate analysis of the unfavorable group, pretreatment PSA (p <0.0001), Gleason score (p = 0.02), palpation T stage (p = 0.009), and radiation dose (p <0.0001) correlated with biochemical failure, and prostate volume and PNI did not. For all 481 bNED patients, a positive correlation between pretreatment volume and PSA nadir was demonstrated (p <0.0001). Subgroup analysis of the favorable and unfavorable patients also demonstrated a positive correlation between prostate volume and PSA nadir (p = 0.003 and p = 0.0002, respectively). Using multiple regression analysis, the following were found to be predictive of PSA nadir in all bNED patients: prostate volume (p <0.0001), pretreatment PSA (p <0.0001), palpation T stage (p = 0.0002), and radiation dose (p = 0.0034). Gleason score and PNI were not predictive. For the favorable group, palpation T stage (p = 0.0006), pretreatment PSA (p = 0.0083), prostate volume (p = 0.0186), and Gleason score (p = 0.0592) were predictive of PSA nadir, and PNI and radiation dose were not predictive. In the unfavorable group, prostate volume (p = 0.0024), radiation dose (p = 0.0039), pretreatment PSA (p = 0.0182), and palpation T stage (p = 0.0296) were predictive of PSA nadir, and Gleason score and PNI were not predictive. CONCLUSION: This report is the first demonstration that prostate volume is predictive of PSA nadir for patients who are bNED in both favorable and unfavorable subgroups. PSA nadir did not correlate with bNED status in the favorable patients, but it was strongly predictive in the unfavorable patients. Prostate gland volume was also predictive of bNED failure in the favorable but not the unfavorable group.