Yield of tissue sampling for submucosal lesions evaluated by EUS

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of submucosal nodules or large gastric folds is a common indication for EUS. Establishing a tissue diagnosis is challenging because the yield of forceps biopsies is low. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of EUS-guided endoscopic submucosal-mucosal resection and forceps biopsy for submucosal nodules and large gastric folds. METHODS: Patients who underwent EUS from March 1997 through January 2002 for evaluation of submucosal nodules or large gastric folds were identified, and the procedure and pathology reports reviewed. Patients were included who underwent endoscopic submucosal-mucosal resection (n = 45) or large-capacity ("jumbo") biopsy (n = 36) of submucosal lesions (arising from third endosonographic layer) or large gastric folds. Endoscopic submucosal-mucosal resection was performed with an electrosurgical snare or with a cap-fitted endoscopic mucosal resection device. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (62% men; mean age, 61 years; range 27-80 years) underwent 69 EUS procedures to obtain tissue samples of subepithelial lesions. Diagnostic yields were as follows: endoscopic submucosal-mucosal resection 40/45 (89%; 95% CI [80%, 98%]), jumbo biopsy 15/36 (42%; 95% CI [26%, 58%]) (p < 0.001 by two-tailed Fisher exact test). There were 9 complications: 7 instances of bleeding (6 endoscopic submucosal-mucosal resection, 1 jumbo biopsy), 3 requiring hospitalization (2 endoscopic submucosal-mucosal resection, 1 jumbo biopsy) and 2 requiring transfusion; 1 chest pain and odynophagia (esophageal endoscopic submucosal-mucosal resection); and 1 oversedation (requiring administration of reversal agents). CONCLUSIONS: For submucosal lesions and large gastric folds, endoscopic submucosal-mucosal resection has a better diagnostic yield than the jumbo biopsy, but may have a higher complication rate.     

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided deep and large biopsy for diagnosis of gastric infiltrating tumors with negative malignant endoscopy biopsies

AIM: To assess the diagnostic yield and safety of adeep and large biopsy technique under the guidance of endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) for diagnosis of gastric infiltrating tumors with negative malignant endoscopy biopsies.METHODS: From January 2009 to March 2014, 36 patients in whom gastric infiltrating tumors had been diagnosed by EUS received negative results for malignancy after endoscopic biopsies. The deep and large biopsy technique combined bite-on-bite technique with or without endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) to obtain submucosal tissue from lesions. EUS was used to select the appropriate biopsy sites. If the lesion protruded into the cavity, EMR was performed for removal of the overlying mucosa and then bite-onbite technique was conducted in the resected area to obtain submucosal tissue. If the lesion appeared to be flat or was difficult to lift by injection, the bite-on-bite technique was directly used.RESULTS: Twenty-eight of the 36 patients were treated by EMR followed by bite-on-bite technique, while 8 patients only underwent bite-on-bite technique. Histological results showed 23 of the 36 lesions were poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas, 2 diffuse large B cell lymphomas, 4 mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue-type lymphomas, and 7 undiagnosed. The deep and large biopsy technique provided a definitive and conclusive diagnosis in 29(80.6%) of the 36 patients. The 12 gastric linitis plastica and 6 lymphoma patients received chemotherapy and avoided surgery. Minor oozing of blood in 2 mucosal resection wounds was managed by argon plasma coagulation and in 5 cases after deep biopsies by epinephrine(0.001%). Neither severe hemorrhage nor perforation occurred in any patient.CONCLUSION: The deep and large biopsy technique is superior to ordinary endoscopic biopsy for achieving an accurate diagnosis of gastric infiltrating tumors.This procedure guided by EUS is an effective and safe diagnostic method for gastric infiltrating tumors in which endoscopic biopsy results were negative for malignancy.     

Comparison between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy and bite-on-bite jumbo biopsy for sampling of subepithelial lesions

Background and AimsA direct comparison between endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and current endoscopic biopsy techniques in patients with subepithelial lesions (SELs) is still lacking. Aim of this multicenter study was to compare the diagnostic performance and safety profile between EUS-FNB and bite-on-bite jumbo biopsy.MethodsOut of 416 patients undergoing endoscopic sampling of SELs between 2017 and 2021, after propensity score matching two groups were compared: 120 undergoing EUS-FNB and 120 sampled with bite-on-bite jumbo biopsy. Primary outcome was sample adequacy. Secondary outcomes were diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and adverse events.ResultsMedian age was 61 years and most patients were male in both groups. Final diagnosis was GIST in 65 patients (54.1%) in the EUS-FNB group and 62 patients in the bite-on-bite biopsy group (51.6%; p = 0.37). Sample adequacy was significantly higher in the EUS-FNB group as compared to the bite-on-bite biopsy group (94.1% versus 77.5%, p<0.001). EUS-FNB outperformed bite-on-bite biopsy also in terms of diagnostic accuracy (89.3% versus 67.1%, p<0.001) and sensitivity (89% vs 64.5%; p<0.001), whereas specificity was 100% in both groups (p = 0.89). These findings were confirmed in subgroup analysis according to SEL location, final diagnosis, and wall layers of the sampled SEL. Adverse event rate was 6.6% in the EUS-FNB group and 30% in the bite-on-bite biopsy group (p<0.001).ConclusionEUS-FNB outperforms bite-on-bite biopsy both in terms of diagnostic yield and safety profile.     

Improved specimen adequacy using jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus

AIM:To assess the sampling quality of four different forceps(three large capacity and one jumbo) in patients with Barrett's esophagus.METHODS:This was a prospective,single-blind study.A total of 37 patients with Barrett's esophagus were enrolled.Targeted or random biopsies with all four forceps were obtained from each patient using a diagnostic endoscope during a single endoscopy.The following forceps were tested:A:FB-220 K disposable large capacity;B:BI01-D3-23 reusable large capacity;C:GBF-02-23-180 disposable large capacity;and jumbo:disposable Radial Jaw 4 jumbo.The primary outcome measurement was specimen adequacy,defined as a well-oriented biopsy sample 2 mm or greater with the presence of muscularis mucosa.RESULTS:A total of 436 biopsy samples were analyzed.We found a significantly higher proportion of adequate biopsy samples with jumbo forceps(71%)(P 0.001 vs forceps A:26%,forceps B:17%,and forceps C:18%).Biopsies with jumbo forceps had the largest diameter(median 2.4 mm)(P 0.001 vs forceps A:2 mm,forceps B:1.6 mm,and forceps C:2mm).There was a trend for higher diagnostic yield per biopsy with jumbo forceps(forceps A:0.20,forceps B:0.22,forceps C:0.27,and jumbo:0.28).No complications related to specimen sampling were observed with any of the four tested forceps.CONCLUSION:Jumbo biopsy forceps,when used with a diagnostic endoscope,provide more adequate specimens as compared to large-capacity forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus.     

Endoscopic diagnosis and resection of esophageal granular cell tumors

Granular cell tumors (GCT) are uncommon neoplasms. There is controversy regarding the endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of esophageal GCT. We studied the endoscopic diagnosis and management of esophageal GCT among 23 patients identified in a single‐institution pathology database. Medical records, pathology, and endoscopic images were reviewed. All patients underwent endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and endoscopic resection was performed in 10 patients. Seven of 23 patients had more than one esophageal GCT. Only six lesions exhibited a classic yellow discoloration. Among patients with a single GCT, three, four, and nine lesions were located in the proximal, middle, and distal esophagus, respectively. EUS showed hypoechoic, smooth‐edged lesions usually confined to deep mucosa and submucosa. Standard forceps biopsy was diagnostic in 19 of 23 patients (83%). Ten GCT ≤ 10 mm in diameter underwent successful endoscopic mucosal resection without complication. The endoscopic appearance, location, and number of esophageal GCT are highly variable. Histological proof is still necessary for the differential diagnosis of this rare neoplasm. Endoscopic forceps biopsy is usually diagnostic. Endoscopic resection appears safe and effective in selected cases with lesions ≤ 10 mm.     

Utility of endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis and treatment of submucosal tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract

'Submucosal tumors' represent a bulge underneath the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract whose etiology cannot be determined by gastrointestinal endoscopy or barium studies. Because many of these lesions do not arise from the submucosa, these abnormalities have been recently referred to as subepithelial lesions. The aim of this review was to assess the value of EUS for the diagnosis and management of suspected subepithelial lesions. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is currently considered the investigative procedure of choice when a subepithelial lesion has been detected. EUS can determine the intra- or extramural location of the lesion, can differentiate vascular, cystic and solid lesions, and can characterize the layer(s) of origin or ultrasound characteristics (size, borders, homogeneity, anechoic areas or echogenic foci). EUS cannot differentiate exactly between benign and malignant tumors, but it can guide fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy or histologic needle biopsies, thus providing samples for cytology or histological analysis. EUS also offers valuable information on the clinical management, and helps to decide whether a lesion should be consequently followed, removed by endoscopy or by surgery. The introduction of EUS and endoscopic submucosal resection (ESMR) clearly changed the management of small subepithelial lesions (less than 3 cm). A clinical decision algorithm was subsequently developed, taking into consideration the information offered by most of the reviews and case reports. However, further prospective studies will have to establish the value and indications of ESMR (used in association with EUS), for the treatment of subepithelial lesions, as compared to surgery and follow-up.     

Diagnosis of submucosal tumor of the upper GI tract by endoscopic resection.

BACKGROUND: Submucosal tumors are frequent findings during endoscopy, although definitive diagnosis based on histologic confirmation presents some difficulties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection based on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) findings to reach a definitive diagnosis of submucosal tumor. METHODS: Fifty-four submucosal tumors of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract were included in this study. EUS was performed to determine the layer of origin and location of the lesion and to rule out malignancy. En bloc resection was attempted for lesions originating in the muscularis mucosa or submucosa. For tumors originating in the muscularis propria, we performed partial resection limited to the covering mucosa to expose the lesion and obtained a sample with standard biopsy forceps. RESULTS: Sufficient samples were obtained in all 54 cases. There was no perforation. Bleeding occurred in only 5 cases (9%) and was easily managed with endoscopic hemostatic methods. EUS and pathologic findings coincided in 74.1% of cases (40 of 54). Benign lesions (leiomyoma, aberrant pancreas, and others) were predominant (52 of 54), although 2 small lesions were confirmed at pathologic study to be malignant (leiomyosarcoma and leiomyoblastoma). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic resection based on EUS findings proved to be an effective and safe method to confirm the histologic diagnosis of submucosal tumor of the upper GI tract. Endoscopic resection should be considered a valuable choice for definitive management of benign submucosal tumors originating in the superficial layers.     

Endoscopic therapy for early colon cancer: the strip biopsy resection technique

Strip biopsy is an endoscopic tissue resection technique in which a lesion and its surrounding tissues are first elevated using physiological saline. The saline solution is injected into the submucosa at the site of the lesion with the help of needle forceps. A snare is placed around the elevated tissue, which is then resected endoscopically by electrocoagulation. The specimen obtained includes both submucosal and mucosal tissues. The authors used this technique to resect a total of 71 lesions of the colon. They were classified histologically as 21 adenocarcinomas, 46 adenomas, 3 metaplastic polyps, and 1 juvenile polyp. All lesions were confirmed to be entirely intramucosal by histological examination. The strip biopsy technique permits resection of tissue down to the submucosal layer regardless of the morphological type of the lesion. This suggests that strip biopsy is an effective new form of endoscopic treatment for early colon cancer.     

Opinion: How to manage subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract?

Subepithelial lesions (SELs) in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract are relatively frequent findings in patients undergoing an upper GI endoscopy. These tumors, which are located below the epithelium and out of reach of conventional biopsy forceps, may pose a diagnostic challenge for the gastroenterologist, especially when SELs are indeterminate after endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The decision to proceed with further investigation should take into consideration the size, location in the GI tract, and EUS features of SELs. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is an example of an SEL that has a well-recognized malignant potential. Unfortunately, EUS is not able to absolutely differentiate GISTs from other benign hypoechoic lesions from the fourth layer, such as leiomyomas. Therefore, EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an important tool for correct diagnosis of SELs. However, small lesions (size < 2 cm) have a poor diagnostic yield with EUS-FNA. Moreover, studies with EUS-core biopsy needles did not report higher rates of histologic and diagnostic yields when compared with EUS-FNA. The limited diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA and EUS-core biopsies of SELs has led to the development of more invasive endoscopic techniques for tissue acquisition. There are initial studies showing good results for tissue biopsy or resection of SELs with endoscopic submucosal dissection, suck-ligate-unroof-biopsy, and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection.     

The diagnostic role of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions with indefinite pathology

Abstract Objective. Endoscopic forceps biopsy is a fundamental modality for the histologic diagnosis of gastric neoplasms. However, the pathologic findings are not always concordant with the endoscopic interpretations. Currently, repeat endoscopic biopsy is the only way to manage lesion of indefinite pathology such as Category 2 according to the revised Vienna classification. We aimed to elucidate the role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in clarifying the final pathologic diagnosis. Method. Among the 2304 gastric ESD cases, a total of consecutive 30 patients with 31 lesions (1.3%) that had a forceps biopsy with indefinite pathology discrepant from the endoscopic findings underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for confirmative diagnosis and treatment. Results. The final pathologic diagnoses of the ESD specimens were as follows: low-grade dysplasia in 3 patients (9.7%); high-grade dysplasia in 2 patients (6.5%); adenocarcinoma in 15 patients (48.4%); and a benign lesion in 11 patients (35.5%). Cases with adenocarcinoma included nine well-differentiated lesions, four moderately differentiated lesions, and two lesions with signet ring cell carcinoma. The complete en bloc resection rate for neoplastic lesions was 95.0%, and the incidence rates of ESD-related bleeding and perforation were 5.0% and 5.0%, respectively. Conclusion. ESD can be considered an effective and safe alternative therapeutic and diagnostic tool for gastric lesions in cases where the forceps biopsy pathology is discrepant from the endoscopic findings. The overall final neoplastic diagnosis rate after ESD was 64.5%, and ESD should be performed for lesions with red coloration and friability.     

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of subepithelial masses

Difficult to diagnose on routine endoscopy, subepithelial masses typically require further investigation given their potential for malignancy. Endoscopic ultrasound has become an indispensable addition to the clinical algorithm; however, tissue sampling may still be necessary to provide an accurate diagnosis. Several modalities and variations within each modality exist for endoscopic tissue acquisition. While bite-on-bite techniques have traditionally produced disappointing results, newer techniques may improve clinical use. Fine-needle aspiration, currently recognized as the standard bearer, is plagued by modest diagnostic yields in randomized studies. Similar to fine-needle aspiration in technique, fine-needle biopsy is emerging as safe and successful with the introduction of improved needle technology. Additionally, new and exciting endoscopic techniques such as submucosal tunneling may change the paradigm of subepithelial management in the future. The following article will discuss techniques specific to endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.     

Early gastric cancer with lymphoid stroma presenting as a subepithelial lesion diagnosed by endoscopic submucosal dissection

A 53-year-old man underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy that showed a 20-mm subepithelial lesion in the middle gastric body. Endoscopic ultrasound revealed a hypoechoic mass located in the submucosa. Biopsy specimens revealed a benign gastric mucosa with severe lymphocytic infiltration in the submucosa. Malignant lymphoma or gastric cancer with lymphoid stroma was suspected. We performed endoscopic submucosal dissection for definitive diagnosis. Histological examination showed undifferentiated adenocarcinoma, which showed positive Epstein–Barr virus-encoded RNA in situ hybridization results, invading the submucosa mixed with dense lymphocytic infiltration. Thus, Epstein–Barr virus-positive gastric cancer with lymphoid stroma was diagnosed. Gastric cancer with lymphoid stroma is a rare subtype of gastric cancer, which is associated with Epstein–Barr virus infection; it sometimes appears as a subepithelial lesion, which makes it difficult to diagnose using standard biopsy. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was useful in obtaining a sufficient tissue for full histological assessment, including immunostaining.     

Early-stage gastric cancers represented as dysplasia in a previous forceps biopsy: The importance of clinical management

Background and aimsBecause histological examination of gastric lesions by forceps biopsy is of limited accuracy, management on the basis of histological results is occasionally controversial. We examined the characteristics of early gastric cancers that presented as dysplasia resulting from a previous forceps biopsy.Patients and methodsBetween April 2007 and December 2010, 341 gastric adenocarcinoma lesions from 330 patients previously diagnosed histologically via endoscopic submucosal dissection were examined. We retrospectively assessed the characteristics of early gastric cancer according to their initial forceps biopsy results.ResultsIn total, 183 EGCs were diagnosed as dysplasia (53.7%; 89 low-grade and 94 high-grade) and 158 (46.3%) as carcinoma by forceps biopsy before endoscopic submucosal dissection. Significant differences were noted with respect to histologic differentiation of carcinomas, Lauren histologic type, depth of invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and en bloc resection between the dysplastic group and carcinoma group, based on forceps biopsy results.ConclusionA forceps biopsy result is not fully representative of the entire lesion and, thus, endoscopic submucosal dissection should be considered for lesions diagnosed as dysplasia via forceps biopsy in order to avoid the risk of missed carcinomas.     

Ectopic pancreas in the stomach of infrequent localization in the muscularis mucosae

Heterotopic pancreatic tissue in the stomach is an uncommon gastric subepithelial lesion. Is usually an asymptomatic condition which is found incidentally. As with other gastric subepithelial lesions, diagnosis can be challenging. Endoscopic forceps biopsy specimens are of little value. Endoscopic ultrasound findings are helpful in characterize this lesions, but they cannot absolutely determine the type of lesion or whether a lesion is benign or malignant. The sequence endosonography- cap assisted endoscopic mucosal resection allows en bloc resection of small gastric subepithelial lesions with low complication rates. We report a case of an ectopic pancreas of the antrum in the stomach that arises from the second layer of the gastric wall (muscularis mucosa) at endoscopic ultrasound that was removed en bloc with cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection technique in one endoscopic session without complications.     

Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Submucosal Nodules in Patients with Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome

Submucosal nodules are often encountered during investigations of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. This is particularly true in diseases resulting in chronic hypergastrinemia, such as Zollinger-Kllison syndrome (ZES), in which submucosal gastric and duodenal lesions can occur. Forceps biopsy of submucosal lesions often yields only normal mucosa; however, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has recently been described as having high diagnostic accuracy for submucosal tumors Therefore, we prospectively studied the use of FNAC in 43 patients with ZES. Overall, 33% of patients with ZES had nodules. In patients with the sporadic form of ZES, submucosal nodules were found in 18%, whereas submucosal nodules were found in 80% of patients who had ZES in conjunction with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I (MEN-I). FNAC identified 11/12 (92%) of the neuroendocrine tumors, and identified another 8/9 as non-neuroendocrine. Jumbo forceps biopsy was performed on 18 nodules and diagnosed one neuroendocrine tumor. Subsequently, 11 of these nodules were found to possess neuroendocrine tumor; thus only 1/11 (9%) neuroendocrine tumors removed were accurately identified by jumbo forceps biopsy. Of the first 14 nodules, sufficient tissue was left after biopsy to permit snare polypectomy on 12 nodules. Four nodules were found to contain neuroendocrine tumor. Snare polypectomy resulted in a duodenal perforation that required surgery in one patient, and thus was not performed on the final seven nodules. We conclude that 1) upper GI tract submucosal nodules are common in patients with ZES, although neuroendocrine tumor is common only in those patients with ZES and MEN-1; 2) FNAC can accurately diagnose submucosal neuroendocrine tumors in patients with ZES; 3) jumbo biopsy is not belpful in the evaluation of these submucosal nodules; and 4) snare polypectomy can result in duodenal perforation, and thus should not be routinely performed.     

直肠类癌的内镜超声诊断和内镜黏膜下切除

目的 研究内镜超声对直肠类癌的诊断价值，探讨内镜下黏膜切除术治疗直肠类癌的应用价值。方法 应用微超声探头对结肠镜发现的黏膜正常的大肠隆起性病灶进行超声检查，对诊断直肠类癌病例应用套扎器对准病灶负压吸引进行圈套结扎，再在皮圈根部连皮圈电切病灶。比较内镜超声诊断和病理检查结果，观察切除标本基底有无肿瘤累及。结果 126例黏膜正常的大肠隆起性病灶经内镜超声诊断，25例直肠类癌全部得到病理证实。直肠类癌表现为黏膜下层的边界清晰、回声欠均匀的低回声肿块。全部类癌病例无固有肌层和血管浸润，行内镜黏膜下切除无一例出现出血和穿孔，切除标本边缘和基底无肿瘤累及。结论 内镜超声可以明确直肠类癌的肠壁来源、大小、内部回声性质、边界、有无肌层和周围血管浸润，内镜下黏膜切除术治疗直肠类癌疗效确切。     

Usefulness of various diagnostic techniques during fiberoptic bronchoscopy for endoscopically visible lung cancer: should cytologic examinations be performed routinely?

BACKGROUND: The question of which combination of procedures gives the best diagnostic yield following fiberoptic bronchoscopy is controversial. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the value of various diagnostic techniques following fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of endoscopically visible lung cancer. METHODS: The study included 98 patients found to have endobronchially visible tumor during routine daily bronchoscopy. Endobronchial lesions were classified as mass, submucosal lesion and infiltration. Washings, brushings and forceps biopsies were obtained in all subjects. Transbronchial needle aspirations were performed in 67 of 76 cases with mass or submucosal lesions. RESULTS: Bronchoscopy was diagnostic for cancer in 88 (89.8%) of the 98 patients. Forceps biopsy specimens gave positive result in 82.7% of cases, transbronchial needle aspirates in 68.6%, brushings in 68.4%, and washings in 31.6%. Combination of forceps biopsy and brushing cytology yielded a positive result for lung cancer in 87 patients. The addition of brushings increased the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy from 82.7% to 88.8% (p < 0.05). Collection of washing specimens in addition to forceps biopsy did not increase the yield of forceps biopsy. Transbronchial needle aspiration gave an additional yield of 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Routine cytological examination of bronchial washings does not increase the yield of forceps biopsy specimens. Transbronchial needle aspiration may give an additional positive yield to forceps biopsy. We conclude that a combination of forceps biopsy and brushing is the best strategy in the diagnosis of bronchoscopically visible lung cancer.     

NOVEL TECHNIQUE OF ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION USING AN EXTERNAL GRASPING FORCEPS FOR SUPERFICIAL GASTRIC NEOPLASIA

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early stage gastric cancer (EGC) has improved the success rate of en bloc resection but results in perforation more often than does endoscopic mucosal resection. We report a novel technique of ESD using an external grasping forceps. A total of 265 lesions with EGC or gastric adenoma were enrolled in this study. Sixteen lesions were located in the upper third portion of the stomach, 114 in the middle third portion, and 135 in the lower third portion. After submucosal injection followed by circumcision of the lesions with a flex knife, the external grasping forceps was introduced with the help of a second grasping forceps and anchored at the margin of the lesion. Oral traction applied with this forceps could elevate the lesion and make the submucosal layer wider and more visible, thereby facilitating dissection of the submucosal layer under direct vision. The mean lesion size was 15.0 mm (range: 5–50 mm). All but 11 lesions (95.8%) could be resected en bloc with free margins. Mean procedure time was 45 min (range: 20–180 min). It was difficult to carry out this procedure when the lesions were located in the cardia, lesser curvature, or posterior wall of the upper third of the gastric body. Bleeding after ESD occurred in 10 patients (3.8%) and perforation occurred in one patient (0.4%). The endoscopic submucosal dissection using an external grasping forceps for superficial gastric neoplasia is efficacious and safe.     

Diagnostic quality of biopsy specimens: comparison between a conventional biopsy forceps and multibite forceps.

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic biopsy is a prerequisite for histopathologic diagnosis. Various types of forceps are used to obtain tissue specimens. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the diagnostic quality of biopsy specimens obtained with a conventional forceps and a Multibite forceps. METHODS: In a prospective, partially blinded, and randomized trial that included 250 patients referred for diagnostic upper and/or lower endoscopy, 510 biopsy specimens obtained with the Multibite forceps were compared with 520 specimens obtained with a conventional forceps. An experienced, blinded pathologist evaluated the specimens for diameter, depth of specimen, artifacts, anatomic orientation, vitality, general histologic quality, and diagnostic quality. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Fisher exact test. A p value of < 0.05 was regarded as significant. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the specimens obtained with the 2 forceps. The p values for the evaluated parameters were as follows: diameter 0.45, depth of specimen 0.56, artifacts 1.0, pathoanatomic orientation 0.40, vitality 0.45, and histologic diagnostic quality 0.53. CONCLUSION: The quality of biopsy specimens obtained with the Multibite forceps is comparable with that of specimens taken with a conventional forceps. Use of the Multibite forceps saves time in that 4 specimens can be obtained in 1 pass in situations in which a large number of specimens are needed or when the potential for transmission of infection is of concern.     

Endoscopic resection of subepithelial tumors

Management of subepithelial tumors (SETs) remains challenging. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has improved differential diagnosis of these tumors but a definitive diagnosis on EUS findings alone can be achieved in the minority of cases. Complete endoscopic resection may provide a reasonable approach for tissue acquisition and may also be therapeutic in case of malignant lesions. Small SET restricted to the submucosa can be removed with established basic resection techniques. However, resection of SET arising from deeper layers of the gastrointestinal wall requires advanced endoscopic methods and harbours the risk of perforation. Innovative techniques such as submucosal tunneling and full thickness resection have expanded the frontiers of endoscopic therapy in the past years. This review will give an overview about endoscopic resection techniques of SET with a focus on novel methods.