When and how to combine growth hormone with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue

The effect of combined treatment with growth hormone (GH) and a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue, or GH alone, on pubertal height gain was assessed in an uncontrolled study in 15 boys and 10 girls with GH deficiency (GHD). Seven boys and six girls were treated with GH alone (group 1), and eight boys and four girls were treated with a combination of GH and an LHRH analogue during puberty (group 2). Mean ages (+/- SD) at the start of GH treatment and at the onset of puberty were significantly lower in group 2 (8.0 +/- 3.3 years and 11.2 +/- 0.8 years, respectively, in boys, and 6.3 +/- 1.6 years and 10.8 +/- 0.7 years in girls) than in group 1 (12.8 +/- 1.9 years and 13.7 +/- 1.4 years in boys, and 11.2 +/- 1.0 years and 12.5 +/- 1.2 years in girls). Height at the onset of puberty was less in group 2 than in group 1, but the difference was significant only for the boys. Combination treatment was started at a mean age of 11.7 +/- 1.2 years in boys and 11.5 +/- 1.0 years in girls. The duration of the combination treatment was 5.1 +/- 1.5 years in boys and 2.3 +/- 0.7 years in girls. The duration of the period between the onset of puberty and the end of GH treatment was significantly longer in group 2 (6.8 +/- 1.2 years in boys and 5.5 +/- 1.0 years in girls) than in group 1 (4.3 +/- 1.6 years in boys and 3.6 +/- 1.4 years in girls). The pubertal height gain was also significantly greater in group 2 (36.7 +/- 6.5 cm in boys and 29.0 +/- 8.3 cm in girls) than in group 1 (21.9 +/- 4.1 cm in boys and 18.6 +/- 4.1 cm in girls). Final height was significantly greater in group 2 than in group 1 in boys. Although there was no significant difference in final height between groups in the girls, the change in height SDS from the start of GH treatment until final height was significantly greater in group 2 (2.7 +/- 1.6 in boys and 4.5 +/- 0.5 SD in girls) than in group 1 (1.0 +/- 0.8 in boys and 1.8 +/- 0.9 SD in girls), in both boys and girls. In conclusion, it appears that combination of an LHRH analogue and GH may increase the pubertal height gain and the final height of children with GHD. The improvement is attributed to the prolongation of the treatment period, permitting slow bone maturation, and to the maintenance of height velocity. This combination treatment appears to be more effective in boys than girls. To fully assess this therapeutic approach, prospective controlled studies are needed.     

Favorable final height outcome in girls with Ullrich-Turner syndrome treated with low-dose growth hormone together with oxandrolone despite starting treatment after 10 years of age

The objective of this study was to find out whether moderate doses of growth hormone (GH) in combination with oxandrolone (Ox) and late initiation of puberty could improve adult height even in relatively old patients with Ullrich-Turner syndrome (UTS). Ninety-one patients with UTS were randomly assigned to receive either GH alone (Saizen, Ares-Serono, Geneva) 18 IU/m2/week (0.2 mg/kg/week) by daily s.c. injections (group GH) or a combination of GH and Ox 0.1 mg/kg/day p.o. (group GH + Ox). Prior to treatment mean age was 10.2 years (GH) and 10.5 years (GH + Ox), mean projected adult height (PAH) was 146.4 cm (GH) and 146.7 cm (GH + Ox). During year 2 the GH dose was increased in the GH group to 24 and later to 28 IU/m2/week (0.27 mg and later 0.31 mg/kg/week). In group GH + Ox, the Ox dose was reduced to 0.05 mg/kg/day after the first 12 months of therapy, and during the last treatment years the GH dose was raised to 24-28 IU/m2/week (0.27-0.31 mg/kg/week) due to declining growth promotion. Some of the patients of group GH were later given Ox in addition to GH because of waning growth velocity, whereas some of the patients of group GH + Ox were taken off Ox due to virilizing side-effects of the high Ox dose, thus making up a third group of patients: group GH + transient Ox. Puberty was induced at a mean age of 14.9 years. In group GH + Ox, cumulative growth during 5 years of therapy was twice the growth anticipated from standards of untreated patients with UTS. Forty-seven patients are now near or at final height: in group GH (n = 7), mean final height was 151.7 cm (PAH 148.1 cm, gain 3.6 cm); in group GH + Ox (n = 15), 155.1 cm (PAH 147.2 cm, gain 7.9 cm); and in group GH + transient Ox (n = 25), 152.8 cm (PAH 146.4 cm, gain 6.4 cm). These results should be regarded as an underestimate of true final height since some the patients are still growing. Moderate doses of GH plus Ox and late induction of puberty definitely improved final height even in patients with UTS treated relatively late.     

Growth response, pubertal growth and final height in Greek children with growth hormone (GH) deficiency on long-term GH therapy and factors affecting outcome

The growth data of 156 children (100 boys, 56 girls) with growth hormone deficiency (GHD), treated with human growth hormone (GH) for 5.7+/-3.7 years, from 1970-1997, were retrospectively analyzed to assess the efficacy of GH treatment and the factors involved. 62.2% of the studied population had idiopathic GHD (IGHD) and 35.2% had organic GHD (OGHD). At initiation of treatment, chronological age (CA) was 10.1+/-4.0 years in children with IGHD and 9.7+/-4.0 years in those with OGHD, while bone age (BA) was 7.0+/-3.7 and 7.7+/-3.2 years, respectively. The SDS of the growth velocity during the first year of therapy (GV1) was negatively related to CA at start of therapy (r = -0.53, p = 0.01). 109 children have reached final height (FH): 67 boys (FH = 165.3+/-6.3 cm) and 42 girls (FH = 153.9+/-5.4 cm). FH SDS was not significantly different from target height (TH) SDS. In the total group, FH SDS was positively related to height SDS for CA and BA at start of therapy (p = 0.01, p = 0.001, respectively), to TH SDS (r = 0.40, p = 0.001), and to GV1 (r = 0.33, p = 0.001). TH SDS was not different between the IGHD and OGHD groups (-1.02+/-0.8 vs. -0.94+/-6.9). The height gain at puberty did not differ between the groups with induced or spontaneous puberty in boys (23.7+/-8.6 vs. 25.4+/-6.9, not significant), while in girls it was higher in the group with spontaneous puberty (12.7+/-7.3 vs. 20.0+/-9.0, p = 0.008). The age and height at start of puberty was higher in girls and boys with induced puberty. In the total group, the FH SDS of children with induced puberty was higher in comparison with those with spontaneous puberty (-1.0+/-0.8 vs. -1.7+/-0.9, p = 0.001) and it was positively related to the height at start of puberty. When the two sexes were analyzed separately, the difference reached significance only in boys. In conclusion, children with GHD on GH treatment achieved a final height which was comparable to their genetic potential. The FH of children with OGHD was not different from those with IGHD. The age and height at start of puberty were the most significant determining factors for FH. Hence, a better FH might be expected by delaying or arresting puberty.     

Effects of combined gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and growth hormone therapy on adult height in precocious puberty: a further contribution

Out of 35 girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty (CPP) treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) (depot-triptorelin) at a dose of 100 microg/kg every 21 days i.m. for at least 2-3 years whose growth velocity fell below the 25th percentile for chronological age (CA), 17 received growth hormone (GH) in addition at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg/week, s.c., 6 days per week, for 2-4 years. The other 18, matched for bone age (BA), CA and duration of GnRHa treatment, who showed the same growth pattern but refused GH treatment, remained on GnRHa alone, and were used as a control group to evaluate GH efficacy. No patient was GH deficient. Both groups discontinued treatment at a comparable BA (mean +/- SD): BA 13.4 +/- 0.6 in GnRHa plus GH group vs 13.0 +/- 0.5 years in the GnRHa alone group. The 35 patients have reached adult height (i.e. growth during the preceding year was less than 1 cm, with a BA of over 15 years). Patients of the group treated with GH plus GnRHa showed an adult height (161.2 +/- 4.8 cm) significantly higher (p < 0.001) than pre-treatment predicted adult height (PAH) calculated according to tables either for accelerated girls (153.2 +/- 5.0 cm) or for average girls (148.6 +/- 4.3 cm). The adult height of the GnRH alone treated group (156.6 +/- 5.7) was not significantly higher than pre-treatment PAH if calculated on Bayley and Pinneau tables for accelerated girls (153.9 +/- 3.8 cm), whilst it remained significantly higher if calculated on tables for average girls (149.6 +/- 4.0 cm) (p < 0.001). The gain between pre-treatment PAH and final height was 8.2 +/- 4.8 cm according to tables for accelerated girls and 12.7 +/- 4.8 cm according to tables for average girls in patients treated with GH plus GnRHa; while in patients treated with GnRH alone the gain calculated between pre-treatment PAH for accelerated girls was just 2.3 +/- 2.9 cm and 7.1 +/- 2.7 cm greater than pre-treatment PAH for average girls. The difference between the gain obtained in the two groups (about 6 cm) remained the same, however PAH was calculated. The addition of GH to GnRHa in a larger cohort of patients with CPP with a longer follow-up confirms the safety of the combined treatment and the still significant but more variable gain in the group with the combined treatment, probably due to the larger number of patients analyzed. Caution is advised in using such an invasive and expensive treatment, and there is need for further studies before widespread clinical use outside a research setting.     

High dose growth hormone treatment induces acceleration of skeletal maturation and an earlier onset of puberty in children with idiopathic short stature.

BACKGROUND: Long term growth hormone (GH) treatment in children with idiopathic short stature (ISS) results in a relatively small mean gain in final height of 3-9 cm, which may not justify the cost of treatment. As it is unknown whether GH treatment during puberty adds to final height gain, we sought to improve the cost-benefit ratio, employing a study design with high dose GH treatment restricted to the prepubertal period. AIMS: To assess the effect of short term, high dose GH treatment before puberty on growth, bone maturation, and pubertal onset. METHODS: Five year results of a randomised controlled study are reported. Twenty six boys and nine girls were randomly assigned to a GH treatment group (n = 17) or a control group (n = 18). Inclusion criteria were: no signs of puberty, height less than -2 SDS, age 4-8 years for girls or 4-10 years for boys, GH concentration >10 micro g/l after provocation, and normal body proportions. To assess GH responsiveness, children assigned to the GH treatment group received GH treatment for two periods of three months (1.5 IU/m2/day and 3.0 IU/m2/day), separated by three month washout periods, during the first year of study. High dose GH treatment (6.0 IU/m2/day) was then started and continued for at least two full years. When puberty occurred, GH treatment was discontinued at the end of a complete year's treatment (for example, three or four years of GH treatment). RESULTS: In response to at least two years on high dose GH treatment, mean (SD) height SDS for chronological age increased significantly in GH treated children from -2.6 (0.5) to -1.3 (0.5) after two years and -1.4 (0.5) SDS after five years of study. No changes in height SDS were observed in controls. A rapid rate of bone maturation of 3.6 years/2 years in treated children compared to 2 years/2 years in controls was observed in response to two years high dose GH treatment. Height SDS for bone age was not significantly different between groups during the study period. GH treated children entered into puberty at a significantly earlier age compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: High dose GH treatment before puberty accelerates bone age and induces an earlier onset of puberty. This may limit the potential therapeutic benefit of this regimen in ISS.     

Adult height in boys and girls with untreated short stature and constitutional delay of growth and puberty: accuracy of five different methods of height prediction

To determine how accurately several methods of height prediction estimate adult height, we compared height predictions calculated by the Bayley-Pinneau, Roche-Wainer-Thissen (RWT), target height, and Tanner-Whitehouse Mark I (TW-MI), and Mark II (TW-MII) methods with final adult height in 37 boys and 32 girls with short stature and constitutional delay of growth and puberty. They were first seen at a chronologic age (mean +/- SD) of 14.80 +/- 1.70 years (boys) and 12.87 +/- 2.56 years (girls). Adult height at 23.14 +/- 1.95 years and 21.05 +/- 2.02 years was 170.4 +/- 5.4 cm (boys) and 157.8 +/- 4.2 cm (girls), respectively, and thus within the lower range of normal. Height predictions were calculated for the total group and for patients with parents of normal (group 1) as well as short stature (group 2). For boys, the RWT method gave very accurate results, underestimating adult height by -0.6 cm for the total group. The prediction errors for the other methods were -7.3 cm (TW-MI), -4.2 cm (TW-MII), and +3.1 cm (Bayley-Pinneau method) or +1.7 cm (target height). For girls, no method was superior in estimating adult height. The mean prediction error was -0.8 cm, -2.1 cm, and -1.8 cm with the Bayley-Pinneau, TW-MI, and TW-MII methods, respectively. In contrast, adult height was overpredicted by +2.3 cm and +1.2 cm with the RWT and target height methods. We conclude that patients with short stature and constitutional delay of growth and puberty reach an adult height in the lower range of normal. Height prediction methods differ with respect to their accuracy and their tendency to overestimate or underestimate adult height.     

A multicentre trial of recombinant growth hormone and low dose oestrogen in Turner syndrome: near final height analysis.

BACKGROUND: Turner syndrome accounts for 15-20% of childhood usage of growth hormone (GH) in the UK but final height benefit remains uncertain. The most effective strategy for oestrogen replacement is also unclear. METHODS: Fifty eight girls who, at start of treatment, were of mean age 9.1 years and projected final height 142.2 cm were randomised to receive in year 1, either low dose ethinyloestradiol 50-75 ng/kg/day, GH 28 IU/m(2) surface area/week as a daily injection, or a combination of ethinyloestradiol and GH. After the first year, the ethinyloestradiol treated girls received combination treatment. After two years, girls aged over 12 years were given escalating ethinyloestradiol to promote pubertal development. RESULTS: Near final height was available for 49 girls at age 16.5 years, 146.8 cm, representing a gain of 4.6 cm, range -7.9 to +11.7 cm. Twelve of the 49 girls gaining 7.5 cm or more were less than 13 years at the start and had received GH for at least four years. Height gain was correlated with greater initial height deficit. Fifteen girls (31%) reached 150 cm or more compared to a predicted 10%. Early supplementation with ethinyloestradiol provided no final height advantage. CONCLUSIONS: Final height gain was modest at 4.6 cm. Younger, shorter girls gained greatest height advantage from GH. Low dosage ethinyloestradiol before planned induction of puberty was not beneficial.     

Adult height in advanced puberty with or without gonadotropin hormone releasing hormone analog treatment

Advanced puberty is defined as the onset of puberty in girls at 8-10 years of age and in boys at 9-11 years. This study analyzes adult height in 57 children with advanced puberty to evaluate the results of treating children (9 girls and 8 boys) with gonadotropin hormone releasing hormone (GnRH) analog and the impact of advanced puberty on adult height in untreated children (31 girls and 9 boys). For treated girls, adult height predicted at the onset of treatment (151.9+/-1.7 cm) was similar to the final adult height (155.3+/-1.4 cm), but lower than target height (157.2+/-1.6 cm, p = 0.04). For untreated girls, adult height predicted at the initial evaluation (156.7+/-1 cm) was also similar to adult height (157+/-1 cm), but lower than the target height (157.6+/-1 cm, p = 0.03). The adult heights of both treated and untreated girls were similar to their target heights. For treated boys, adult height predicted at the onset of treatment (173.2+/-3.1 cm) was greater than the final adult height (164.1+/-2.1 cm, p = 0.01), which was lower than target height (170.4+/-1.2 cm, p = 0.01). For untreated boys, adult height predicted at the initial evaluation (170.8+/-2.7 cm) was similar to both the adult height (169.1+/-1.9 cm) and target height (170.2+/-1.2 cm). Height gains between the onset of puberty and adult height were similar in treated (29.9+/-2.3 cm in girls and 29.8+/-1.7 cm in boys) and untreated (28.6+/-1 and 33.1+/-2 cm) children. When expressed as SD, the adult height was significantly shorter than that at 4 years in treated girls (difference 1 SD, p = 0.03), in untreated girls (difference 0.9 SD, p = 0.0002) and in treated boys (difference 0.9 SD, p = 0.02), but it was similar to that in untreated boys. Adult height was below target height by >5 cm in seven girls (two of them treated) and five boys (four of them treated). In conclusion, treating advanced puberty did not change the adult height reached by girls, and was associated with reduced growth potential in boys. The adult heights of untreated children were similar to those predicted at the initial evaluation and to target heights, but in girls they were 1 SD lower than the height at 4 years. These data suggest that advanced puberty decreases the growth potential by about 5 cm, and that GnRH analog treatment does not prevent this.     

Ullrich-Turner-Syndrom und Noonan-Syndrom

Some of the phenotypic features of Noonan syndrome (NS) resemble those of Ullrich-Turner syndrome (UTS), but on the other hand there are striking differences between these two syndromes. The incidence of UTS is 1:2000–2500 in liveborn females, the incidence of NS is 1:1000–2500 live births. Patients with UTS are females and have gonadal dysgenesis, short stature, characteristic physical features, and a complete or partial X monosomy in some or all cells. Short stature and hypogonadism are the main problems in this syndrome. Mean final height in UTS is 20 cm below normal female adult height. Growth hormone (GH) treatment can increase adult height markedly if started early. Only some girls with UTS undergo spontaneous pubertal development. Boys and girls with NS have distinctive dysmorphic features, short stature, and congenital heart defects, while the karyotype is normal. The main problems are congenital heart disease and short stature. Patients with NS seem to benefit from GH treatment, but so far it is unclear whether adult height is increased, too. GH treatment for short stature in NS is not yet officially approved.     

Height prognosis of children with true precocious puberty and growth hormone deficiency: effect of combination therapy with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and growth hormone.

We evaluated height prognosis and therapeutic efficacy of long-term, combination therapy with gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonist and growth hormone (GH) in five children (three girls) with coexistent precocious puberty and GH deficiency. Their clinical characteristics and growth response were compared with those of 12 girls with idiopathic true precocious puberty and eight prepubertal GH-deficient children (one girl). Precocious GH-deficient subjects were older than the precocious GH-sufficient children (9.5 +/- 1.8 years vs 6.5 +/- 1.3 years; mean +/- SD), but bone ages were comparable (12 +/- 3.7 years vs 10 +/- 0.9 years); their chronologic age was similar to that of the prepubertal GH-deficient children (9.6 +/- 2.1 years), but bone age was significantly more advanced (6.9 +/- 2.3 years). The mean height velocity of the prepubertal GH-deficient children (3.8 +/- 1.5 cm/yr) was lower than that of the precocious GH-deficient subjects (6.7 +/- 1.6 cm/yr) and the precocious GH-sufficient children (9.5 +/- 2.9 cm/yr). Baseline adult height prediction z scores were significantly lower in the precocious GH-deficient children (-3.7 +/- 1.0) than in either the precocious GH-sufficient children (-2.2 +/- 1.0) or the prepubertal GH-deficient subjects (-1.5 +/- 0.8). During therapy with gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonist, growth rates slowed to an average of 3.7 cm/yr in the precocious GH-deficient children but increased after the addition of GH to 7.4 cm during the first year of combination therapy. After 2 to 3 years of combination therapy, height predictions increased an average of 10 cm, compared with an increase of 2.8 cm in the precocious GH-sufficient group treated with gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonist alone. We conclude that combination treatment with gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonist and GH improves the height prognosis of children with coexistent true precocious puberty and GH deficiency, but falls short of achieving normal adult height potential.     

Anabolic steroid and gonadotropin releasing hormone analog combined treatment increased pubertal height gain and adult height in two children who entered puberty with short stature

We studied the effect of gonadal suppression treatment in combination with anabolic steroid on pubertal height gain and adult height in two children who entered puberty with short stature. Patient 1 was a female with idiopathic short stature. She received combined treatment with an anabolic steroid (stanozolol) and a gonadotropin releasing hormone analog (leuprorelin acetate). Her pubertal height gain was 28.5 cm, which is greater than that in normal height girls (20-25 cm). Patient 2 was a male with Aarskog syndrome. Although his growth hormone (GH) secretion was normal, he received GH treatment. Since GH administration did not accelerate his growth, he received combined treatment with stanozolol and leuprorelin acetate. His pubertal height gain was 27.0 cm, which is greater than that observed in GH deficient boys treated with GH alone (21.9 cm). Combined treatment with stanozolol and leuprorelin acetate appears to be effective in increasing pubertal height gain and adult height in children who enter puberty with short stature.     

A multicentre trial of recombinant growth hormone and low dose oestrogen in Turner syndrome: near final height analysis

BACKGROUND—Turner syndrome accounts for 15-20% of childhood usage of growth hormone (GH) in the UK but final height benefit remains uncertain. The most effective strategy for oestrogen replacement is also unclear.METHODS—Fifty eight girls who, at start of treatment, were of mean age 9.1 years and projected final height 142.2 cm were randomised to receive in year 1, either low dose ethinyloestradiol 50-75 ng/kg/day, GH 28 IU/m² surface area/week as a daily injection, or a combination of ethinyloestradiol and GH. After the first year, the ethinyloestradiol treated girls received combination treatment. After two years, girls aged over 12 years were given escalating ethinyloestradiol to promote pubertal development.RESULTS—Near final height was available for 49 girls at age 16.5 years, 146.8 cm, representing a gain of 4.6 cm, range ?7.9 to +11.7 cm. Twelve of the 49 girls gaining 7.5 cm or more were less than 13 years at the start and had received GH for at least four years. Height gain was correlated with greater initial height deficit. Fifteen girls (31%) reached 150 cm or more compared to a predicted 10%. Early supplementation with ethinyloestradiol provided no final height advantage.CONCLUSIONS—Final height gain was modest at 4.6 cm. Younger, shorter girls gained greatest height advantage from GH. Low dosage ethinyloestradiol before planned induction of puberty was not beneficial.     

Reduction of body height in tall girls by estrogen treatment]

Twenty-six girls with constitutional tall stature were treated with 0.5 mg ethinyloestradiol daily po and 10 mg norethisteronacetate from day 21 to 25 of the cycle for 1.4 +/- 0.4 years. Height, weight, bone age according to Greulich-Pyle (GP) and Tanner (RUS), height predictions according to Bayley Pinneau (BP) and Tanner Whitehouse (TW) were recorded at the onset of therapy, at the end of treatment and 7.4 years later. The mean chronological age at start of treatment was 12.6 +/- 1.1 years, bone age (GP) 12.4 +/- 0.7 years, (RUS) 13.5 +/- 0.7 years. The initial height prediction according to BP was 186.2 +/- 4.1 cm, which was 3.5 cm higher than the prognosis according to Tanner Whitehouse. Depending on the method used for height prediction, the height reduction by treatment was 4.6 +/- 3.0 cm (BP) or 1.4 +/- 2.2 cm (TW), respectively. The reduction of predicted height was more pronounced in girls with a bone age (GP) < 12.5 years at the initiation of therapy (n = 13), than in girls with a bone age > or = 12.5 years (n = 13). Final height was measured 7.4 years after the end of treatment. Chronological age: 21.3 +/- 3.7 years, final height 181.8 +/- 3.7 cm. Mean final height after therapy was 7.7 cm above target height, or, after allowance for the secular trend, 3.8 cm above target height. Body weight, recorded in centiles of body mass index, increased from the 38.5 +/- 26 to the 58.1 +/- 22 centile, weight gain was more pronounced in younger girls. At follow up investigation 18/19 girls, who answered a questionnaire, had a positive view of the previous treatment.     

Final height after combined growth hormone and GnRH analogue treatment in adopted girls with early puberty

Background: Girls adopted from developing countries often have early or precocious puberty, requiring treatment with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues. During such treatment, decreased growth velocity is frequent. Aim: To study whether the addition of growth hormone (GH) to GnRH analogue treatment improves final height in girls with early or precocious puberty. Methods: Forty-six girls with early or precocious puberty (age ≤9.5 y) adopted from developing countries were randomized for treatment for 2-4 y with GnRH analogue, or with a combination of GH and GnRH analogue. Results: During treatment, the mean growth velocity in the GH/GnRH analogue group was significantly higher compared to the control group. Combined GH/GnRH analogue treatment resulted in a higher final height: 158.9 cm compared to 155.8 cm in the GnRH analogue-treated group. Three out of 24 girls (13%) in the combined group and nine of the 22 girls (41%) treated with GnRH analogue alone attained a final height below -2 standard deviation scores (SDS).

Conclusion: The difference between the two groups is statistically significant, and possibly of clinical importance. A future challenge is to identify a subgroup with clinically significant advantage of GH addition to GnRH analogue treatment. Being very short on arrival in Sweden and being short and young at start of treatment are possible indicators.     

Growth hormone treatment during suppression of early puberty in adopted girls

Girls adopted from developing countries often have early or precocious puberty, requiring treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues. During such treatment decreased growth velocity is frequent. The aim of this investigation was to study whether the addition of growth hormone (GH) to GnRH analogue treatment improves height velocity and final height in girls with early or precocious puberty. Forty-six girls with early or precocious puberty adopted from developing countries were randomized for treatment with GnRH analogue or a combination of GH and GnRH analogue. After 2 y of treatment the mean growth in the GH/GnRH analogue group was significantly higher, 14.6 cm, compared to 10.9 cm in the control group. The increase in bone age did not differ, while the difference in predicted adult height increased by 2.7 cm in favour of the combination group. Although data on final height are not yet available, combined GH/GnRH analogue treatment for 2 y resulted in a higher growth velocity and predicted final height compared to GnRH analogue treatment alone.     

Optimization of treatment in Turner's syndrome

We discuss treatment for short stature and hypogonadism in patients with Turner's syndrome, using recombinant human growth hormone (GH) and estrogen. We discuss the starting dose of GH, age at start of treatment, and association with oxandrolone or low dose estrogen therapy before 12 years old. We provide recommendations for optimization of therapy for best final height and induction of puberty with estrogen therapy. Our experience in the Children's Endocrinology Clinic in "La Paz" University Hospital, Madrid, is that 83% of our patients need estrogen therapy and only 17% had spontaneous menarche. The average age for puberty induction was 12.2 years, and the average duration of estrogen treatment was 2.1 years. The average final height obtained using GH treatment was 151.3 cm with a gain related to predicted height of 6.8 cm.     

Effect of Pubertal Suppression on Linear Growth and Body Mass Index; a Two-Year Follow-Up in Girls with Genetic Short Stature and Rapidly Progressive Puberty

Objective: Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone agonists (GnRHa) are used to improve the final adult height in short stature children. There are limited studies which address the potential side effect of these agents: excessive weight gain. We have followed girls with rapidly progressive puberty receiving GnRHa and results were focused on the effect of treatment on final height, weight and body mass index Methods: Thirty girls between 8.5 and 12 years with short stature and predicted adult height of less than 155 cm were enrolled in the study. All had rapidly progressive puberty. Weight and height measurements were done at the beginning of treatment, 6 and 12 months after starting and 6 and 12 months after the cessation of treatment. Bone age and stages of puberty were estimated at the beginning of treatment, after 12 months of starting and 12 months after the treatment was stopped. Findings : Predicted adult height (PAH) changes during treatment were not significant. There was no significant difference between final height and weight according to the body mass index (BMI), PAH or bone age. Conclusion: We conclude that girls with genetic short stature and rapidly progressive puberty will not benefit receiving a one-year course of GnRHa and there is no significant difference between the final height and final weigh among children according to BMI.Key Words: Short Stature; Puberty; Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonists; Body Mass Index     

Human growth hormone and gonadotropin releasing hormone analog combination therapy increases predicted height in short normal girls

The "short normal" child constitutes a real challenge for the pediatric endocrinologist. In a subgroup of short normal children, puberty starts at a normal age but with low height, and hence, the final height is expected to be quite compromised. Efforts to improve the outcome in this group have been made in the past with equivocal results. We present the growth data of 8 short girls with normal growth hormone values on provocative testing and low height at puberty initiation. At intervention the height and the stage of puberty were 129.3 +/- 5 cm and II to III, respectively, and the predicted height was 148.8 +/- 2.6 cm. Gonadotropin releasing hormone analog, triptorelin (3.6 +/- 0.5 microg/kg/day) and growth hormone (0.5 IU/kg/week) were used in different sequential order and simultaneously in each child. The mean total treatment period was 47.6 +/- 11.2 months. The mean predicted and the mean final height in the total group were 148.8 +/- 2.6 and 154.5 +/- 3.6 cm, respectively (p:0.028). The final height did not differ from the target height (154.8 +/- 8 cm versus 154.5 +/- 3.6 cm), while in 4 children, the final height was greater than the target height. The height gain (delta Final height - Predicted height) was 5.7 +/- 1.3 cm. If we analyze separately the girls in whom growth hormone was started first and gonadotropin releasing hormone analog followed versus those who started the analog first, the delta Final height - Predicted height was 8 +/- 3 cm in the former and 4.8 +/- 3.1 cm in the latter (p:0.03). It seemed that the difference was accounted for by duration of growth hormone therapy (51.3 +/- 10.6 months versus 28.6 +/- 10.6 months) (p:0.026), rather than by other factors. In conclusion, under the conditions of the present study, the combination of puberty arrest and growth hormone therapy significantly improved predicted height. The most significant determinant of the height gain was the duration of growth hormone therapy.     

Improved final height in Turner's syndrome following growth-promoting treatment at a single centre

AIMS: To examine the final height (FH) outcome of girls with Turner's syndrome (TS) treated at a single Scottish centre (Glasgow group), to compare it with an earlier national analysis (Scottish group) and to suggest reasons for any change. METHODS: Retrospective growth and treatment data for 29 Glasgow patients were compared with those of 26 Scottish patients. RESULTS: Age at GH start (mean +/- SD) was 10.1 +/- 2.6 vs 12.1 +/- 1.7 y (p < 0.01) in the Glasgow versus Scottish groups, with overall duration of treatment 6.2 +/- 2.4 vs 3.7 +/- 1.1 y (p < 0.001) and years of GH treatment before pubertal induction 2.7 +/- 2.8 vs 0.3 +/- 0.8 y (p < 0.001), respectively. Pubertal induction was at a similar age: 12.7 +/- 1.8 vs 12.8 +/- 1.8 y (ns). FH was 151.1 +/- 4.6 cm in the Glasgow group compared with 142.6 +/- 5.6 cm in the Scottish group (p < 0.001), with FH - projected adult height (PAH) 5.7 +/- 4.6 cm vs 0.6 +/- 3.6 cm (p < 0.001), respectively. Univariate analysis of the Glasgow group's FH - PAH with a number of growth and treatment variables identified no statistically significant relationships. CONCLUSION: This group's improved FH and FH - PAH, relative to an earlier sample, are attributed to the introduction of GH treatment from a younger age and for longer, overall and before pubertal induction. In addition, the authors believe that compliance with treatment has been enhanced by this single centre's dedicated Turner clinic and the efforts of its established "growth team". These data demonstrate that a favourable FH can be achieved using a safe and financially viable dose of GH, while inducing puberty at a "normal" age.     

Present status of the use of growth hormone in short children with bone diseases (diseases of the skeleton)

Skeletal dysplasias are genetic disorders of bone and cartilage development, mainly characterized by disproportionate short stature. Achondroplasia is the commonest and best described form of skeletal dysplasia, leading to a mean final height of 131+/-5.6 cm for males and 124+/-5.9 cm for females. Growth hormone (GH) has been used in different studies in patients with achondroplasia in order to ameliorate their height, and short term results range from rather positive to moderate. However, disproportionate advancement of bone age has been observed that can compromise the positive effect of such treatment. Furthermore, concern exists about the aggravation of body disproportion necessitating a later leg lengthening procedure in order to achieve proportionate adult stature. In hypochondroplasia, GH treatment seems to give better results when administered at puberty. No data on final height yet exist, however, so that more studies with greater numbers of patients need to be performed before a consensus on GH use in achondroplasia and hypochondroplasia can be reached. Other forms of skeletal dysplasias are quite rare, so that no conclusion on GH use in such patients can be drawn. Finally, in osteogenesis imperfecta, GH administration significantly ameliorates bone density but does not clearly seem to affect final height positively.