Comparison of long-term outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus drug-eluting stents in triple-vessel coronary artery disease

After the introduction of drug-eluting stents (DESs), percutaneous coronary intervention with DESs has challenged coronary artery bypass grafting as the gold standard for the treatment of 3-vessel coronary artery disease. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term clinical results between percutaneous coronary intervention with DESs and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) in 3-vessel coronary artery disease. Two hundred ninety propensity-score matched patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease treated by DESs or OPCAB were included. Mean follow-up duration was 58.8 ± 11.5 months (2 to 73) and follow-up rate was 97.9%. Five-year survival rates were 94.8 ± 2.1% in the DES group and 96.5 ± 1.5% in the OPCAB group (p = 0.658). Five-year rates of freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event were 71.6 ± 4.1% in the DES group and 89.6 ± 2.5% in the OPCAB group (p < 0.001). Freedom from nonfatal myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization rates were the determining factors between the 2 groups (p = 0.018 and p < 0.001, respectively). The OPCAB group showed better clinical outcomes compared to the DES group in 3-vessel coronary artery disease after 5-year follow-up. Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event rate was significantly higher in the OPCAB group mainly because of the lower incidence of target vessel revascularization and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Longer follow-up with randomization will clarify our present conclusions.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus optimal medical therapy alone: effectiveness of incomplete revascularization in high risk patients

Background Geriatric patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) are a challenging group to treat; these cases elicit discussion within heart teams regarding the actual benefit of undertaking major surgery on these patients and often lead to abandon the surgical option. Percutaneous procedures represent an important option, but coronary anatomy may be unfavorable. Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) provides good quality graft on left anterior descending (LAD) without exposing the patient to cardiopulmonary bypass, and might be the ideal choice in patients with multiple comorbidities, not eligible to percutaneous or on-pump procedures. The objective of this study was to compare survival during a mid-term follow-up in high-risk patients with no percutaneous alternative, either treated with OPCAB or discharged in medical therapy. Methods We retrospectively evaluated from June 2008 to June 2013, 83 high-risk patients with multivessel CAD were included: 42 were treated with incomplete off-pump revascularization using left internal mammary artery (LIMA) on LAD; 41 were discharged in optimal medical therapy (OMT), having refused surgery. Follow-up ended in March 2015, with a telephonic interview. Primary endpoint was survival from all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were survival from cardiac-related mortality and freedom from non-fatal major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Results During follow up, 11 deaths in OPCAB group and 27 deaths in OMT group occurred. Death was due to cardiac factors in 6 and 15 patients, respectively. MACEs were observed in 6 patients in OPCAB group and in 4 patients in OMT group. With regards to survival from all-cause mortality, patients who underwent OPCAB survived more than those discharged in OMT (Log Rank < 0.001), and OMT group carries a propensity score-adjusted hazard ratio of 3.862 (P < 0.001). With regards to survival from cardiac-related events, patients who underwent OPCAB survived more than those discharged in OMT (Log Rank = 0.002), and OMT group carries a propensity score-adjusted hazard ratio of 3.663 (P = 0.010). There is no statistically significant difference concerning freedom from MACEs (Log Rank = 0.273). Conclusions For high-risk patients with multivessel CAD, not eligible to on-pump complete revascularization surgery or percutaneous procedures, incomplete revascularization with OPCAB LIMA-on-LAD offers benefits in survival when compared to OMT alone.     

Influence of diabetes mellitus on long-term (five-year) outcomes of drug-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary revascularization

Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) and for diffuse and progressive atherosclerosis. We evaluated the outcomes of drug-eluting stent (DES) placement and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 891 diabetic patients (489 for DES implantation and 402 for CABG) and 2,151 nondiabetic patients (1,058 for DES implantation and 1,093 for CABG) with multivessel CAD treated from January 2003 through December 2005 and followed up for a median 5.6 years. Outcomes of interest included death; the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke; and repeat revascularization. In diabetic patients, after adjusting for baseline covariates, 5-year risk of death (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 1.33, p = 0.96) and the composite of death, MI, or stroke (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 1.31, p = 0.91) were similar in patients undergoing DES or CABG. However, rate of repeat revascularization was significantly higher in the DES group (hazard ratio 3.69, 95% confidence interval 2.64 to 5.17, p <0.001). These trends were consistent in nondiabetic patients (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 1.16, p = 0.23 for death; hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.05, p = 0.10 for composite of death, MI, or stroke; hazard ratio 2.77, 95% CI 1.95 to 3.91, p <0.001 for repeat revascularization). There was no significant interaction between diabetic status and treatment strategy on clinical outcomes (p for interaction = 0.36 for death; 0.20 for the composite of death, MI, or stroke; and 0.40 for repeat revascularization). In conclusion, there was no significant prognostic influence of diabetes on long-term treatment with DES or CABG in patients with multivessel CAD.     

Value of the initial electrocardiogram in patients with inferior-wall acute myocardial infarction for prediction of multivessel coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: Patients with inferior-wall acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who have ST-segment depression in the left precordial leads (LSTD+) on the initial electrocardiogram were reported to have more diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD) than had those without this finding (LSTD-). This suggests that LSTD+ patients may need extensive revascularization interventions more often than do LSTD- patients. However, this has not yet been confirmed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the coronary angiographic findings and treatment strategies for patients with inferior-wall AMI according to the LSTD pattern. METHODS: The clinical outcomes and the angiographic findings for 238 consecutive patients aged < or = 75 years who had been admitted to our hospital between 1 February 1995 and 1 February 1997 with inferior-wall AMI were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the pattern of precordial ST-segment depression: LSTD+, ST-segment depression in leads V4-V6; and LSTD-, absence of this finding. All patients were treated according to current practice guidelines including with thrombolysis and revascularization interventions. RESULTS: The final study population included 217 patients; 83 were LSTD+ and 134 were LSTD-. All underwent coronary angiography within 30 days of the infarction. Compared with LSTD- patients, LSTD+ patients tended to be older (mean age 62.7 +/- 11.7 versus 58.3 +/- 9.6 years, P = 0.004), and had higher incidences of hypertension (39.8 versus 24.6%, P = 0.019) previous myocardial infarction (45.8 versus 20.1%, P = 0.0001) and congestive heart failure (21.7 versus 3.7%, P = 0.00008). Three-vessel CAD was much more common, and single-vessel CAD much less common, in the LSTD+ than in LSTD- group (62.7 versus 13.4% and 8.4 versus 50.7%, P < 0.00001 for both). Coronary-artery-bypass surgery and multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were used in treating 65.1% of the LSTD+ versus only 6.0% of the LSTD- patients (P < 0.00001), whereas single-vessel PCI was used in treating 71.6% of the LSTD- patients versus only 24.1% of the LSTD+ patients (P < 0.00001). Thus, the LSTD- pattern predicted single-vessel disease and single-vessel PCI only, whereas the LSTD+ pattern was predictive of multivessel CAD and of use of coronary-artery-bypass surgery or multivessel PCI (predictive values of 94.0 and 65.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with inferior-wall AMI, left precordial ST-segment depression predicts a very high prevalence of multivessel CAD and use of extensive revascularization interventions. The absence of this finding predicts nondiffuse CAD and lack of a need for extensive revascularization.     

Early and mid-term impacts of cardiopulmonary bypass on coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor left ventricular dysfunction: a propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass may exacerbate myocardial damage in compromised left ventricles. Early and mid-term outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) vs on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (On-pump CABG) were compared in patients with poor left ventricular dysfunction, using an analysis of a propensity score matching. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between December 2000 and November 2005, 1,473 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in our institute and 153 patients who had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) lower than 35% were enrolled. The OPCAB group contained 100 patients and the On-pump CABG group contained 53 patients. Preoperative risk factors were compared and 50 patients in each group were matched. The mean follow-up time was 35.5+/-17.3 months. Three deaths (3.0%) occurred in the matched cohort, with no significant difference between 2 groups. The operation time, ventilation time, intensive care unit admission time and occurrence of respiratory failure were significantly lower in the OPCAB group. The mean LVEF of the 2 groups improved significantly. The overall 6-year actuarial survival rates of the OPCAB and On-pump CABG group were 88.2% and 72.4% (p=0.2), respectively, and there were no significant differences in 6-year rates of freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (p=0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor left ventricular dysfunction improved myocardial function. Postoperative respiratory failure was significantly related to the cardiopulmonary bypass for surgical myocardial revascularization. Off-pump and On-pump surgical revascularization resulted in equivalent mid-term outcomes.     

老年肾动脉狭窄与冠状动脉病变的关系及其相关因素

目的 在冠状动脉造影（CAG）的老年患者中观察并发肾动脉狭窄(RAS)的发生率,并分析并发RAS的影响因素。方法 CAG同时行肾动脉造影（RAG）患者277例,分析动脉粥样硬化的危险因素与RAS发生的关系。结果 经CAG证实冠心病患者212例,RAS发生率19%,CAG正常患者RAS发生率8%,冠脉多支病变组中RAS发生率明显高于单支病变组及冠状动脉正常组（P<0.01）,多因素分析,独立预测因子为冠状动脉病变程度（OR=1.89,95%可信区间:1.35-2.65,P<0.01）。结论 冠心病患者有较高RAS发生率,发现冠状动脉多支病变患者应常规行RAG检查。     

Comparison of coronary drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus

We compared 1-year outcome after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation with off-pump bypass grafing (OPCABG) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease involving the proximal segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery. All consecutive diabetic patients treated by DES (DES group) or OPCABG (CABG group) in our institution from April 2002 to December 2004 because of de novo coronary lesions were included. Patients in the CABG group (n = 149) were older and had a higher rate of 3-vessel disease than those in the DES group (n = 69). At 12 months, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events occurred in 29% of the DES group and 20.5% of the CABG group (unadjusted analysis, odds ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93 to 1.54, p = 0.17). After propensity score analysis, adjusting for baseline differences between the 2 cohorts, DESs increased the risk of 12-month major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio 1.88, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.02, p = 0.020). This was due to the higher rate for repeat revascularization in the DES group (19% vs 5%, odds ratio 2.05, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.75, p = 0.001). In contrast, there was no difference in the rate of the composite end points of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (DES group 13%, CABG group 12%; adjusted analysis, hazard ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.35, p = 0.40). In conclusion, at 1 year in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease involving the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, the advantage of OPCABG over DES implantation seems to be limited at a lower rate of repeat revascularization. No difference seems to exist in the rate of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction.     

Usefulness of revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease before elective vascular surgery for abdominal aortic and peripheral occlusive disease

The Coronary Artery Revascularization Prophylaxis (CARP) study showed no survival benefit with preoperative coronary artery revascularization before elective vascular surgery. The generalizability of the trial results to all patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) has been questioned. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of prophylactic coronary revascularization on long-term survival in patients with multivessel CAD. Over a 4-year period, 1,048 patients underwent coronary angiography before vascular surgery during screening into the CARP trial. The cohort was composed of registry (n = 586) and randomized (n = 462) patients, and their survival was determined at 2.5 years after vascular surgery. High-risk coronary anatomy without previous bypass surgery included 2-vessel disease (n = 204 [19.5%]), 3-vessel disease (n = 130 [12.4%]), and left main coronary artery stenosis >/=50% (n = 48 [4.6%]). By log-rank test, preoperative revascularization was associated with improved survival in patients with a left main coronary artery stenoses (0.84 vs 0.52, p <0.01) but not those with either 2-vessel (0.80 vs 0.79, p = 0.83) or 3-vessel (0.79 vs 0.71, p = 0.15) disease. In conclusion, unprotected left main coronary artery disease was present in 4.6% of patients who underwent coronary angiography before vascular surgery, and this was the only subset of patients showing a benefit with preoperative coronary artery revascularization.     

Clinical significance of antibody against oxidized low density lipoprotein in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to establish the clinical significance of antibodies against oxidized low density lipoprotein (anti-Ox-LDL) titer in atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: Oxidative modification of LDL, which plays a key role in the development of atherosclerosis, induces immunogenic epitopes in the LDL molecule, and the presence of anti-Ox-LDL has been demonstrated in human sera. METHODS: Anti-Ox-LDL titer was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 108 patients who had angiographically verified CAD, and 31 patients who had chest pain but no significant CAD, as controls. RESULTS: The anti-Ox-LDL titer was higher (p < 0.01) in patients with multivessel CAD (19.4 +/- 10.1 AcU/ml, n = 68) than in the controls (9.8 +/- 4.1). However, no significant difference was shown between the single-vessel CAD group (15.1 +/- 6.4, n = 40) and the controls, or between the multivessel CAD group and the single-vessel CAD group. The titer was higher in patients with unstable angina (21.5 +/- 11.8 AcU/ml, n = 20, p < 0.01), or in patients with acute myocardial infarction (23.1 +/- 12.0, n = 20, p < 0.01) than in patients with stable-effort angina or old myocardial infarction (12.2 +/- 8.6, n = 68). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that the anti-Ox-LDL titer most powerfully discriminated CAD patients from controls (odds ratio [OR]: 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.33, p = 0.0006) and acute coronary syndrome from chronic CAD (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04-1.14, p = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Serum anti-Ox-LDL titer not only can predict a presence of atherosclerotic CAD but also may be a marker of plaque instability. Low density lipoprotein oxidation may play an important role in the development of plaque instability.     

In unstable angina or non-ST-segment acute coronary syndrome, should patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergo multivessel or culprit-only stenting?

OBJECTIVES: We examined the safety and efficacy of nonculprit multivessel compared with culprit-only stenting in patients with multivessel disease presenting with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes [NSTE-ACS]). BACKGROUND: In patients presenting with NSTE-ACS, multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with adverse outcome. METHODS: Patients with multivessel CAD and NSTE-ACS that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were included. The culprit lesion was defined by reviewing each patient's angiographic report, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram and, if available, nuclear stress test. All patients had at least 2 vessels with > or =50% stenosis, and the angiographic severity of CAD was assessed using the Duke Prognostic Angiographic Score. Patients with coronary bypass grafts, chronic total occlusions, and those with uncertain culprit lesions were excluded. Our end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or any target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: From January 1995 to June 2005, 1,240 patients with ACS and multivessel CAD underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with bare-metal stenting and met our study criteria. Of these, 479 underwent multivessel and 761 underwent culprit-only stenting. There were 442 events during a median follow-up of 2.3 years. Multivessel intervention was associated with lower death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization after both adjusting for baseline and angiographic characteristics (hazard ratio 0.80; 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.99; p = 0.04) and propensity matched analysis (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.88; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multivessel CAD presenting with NSTE-ACS, multivessel intervention was significantly associated with a lower revascularization rate, which translated to a lower incidence of the composite end point compared with culprit-only stenting.     

Procedural results and late clinical outcomes following multivessel coronary stenting

ObjectivesTo evaluate in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes in a large consecutive series of patients undergoing percutaneous multivessel stent intervention.BackgroundHigh restenosis and recurrent angina rates have limited the clinical outcomes of multivessel coronary angioplasty before stents were available to improve angioplasty results.MethodsWe evaluated in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes (death, Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI], and repeat revascularization rates at one year) in 398 consecutive patients treated with coronary stents in two (94% of patients) or three native arteries, compared to 1,941 patients undergoing stenting procedure in a single coronary artery between January 1, 1994 and August 29, 1997.ResultsOverall procedural success was obtained in 96% of patients with two- or three-vessel stenting and in 97% of patients with single-vessel stent intervention (p = 0.36). Procedural complications were also similar (3.8% for multivessel versus 2.9% for single vessel, p = 0.14). During follow up, target lesion revascularization was 15% in multivessel and 16% in single-vessel interventions (p = 0.38), and repeat revascularization (calculated per treated patient) was also similar for both groups (20% vs. 21%, p = 0.73). There was no difference in death (1.4% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.26), and Q-wave MI (1.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.02) was lower following multivessel interventions. Overall cardiac event-free survival was similar for both groups (p = 0.52).ConclusionsUnlike previous conventional angioplasty experiences, multivessel stenting has (1) similar in-hospital procedural success and major complication rates and (2) similar long-term (one year) clinical outcomes compared with single-vessel stenting. Thus, stents may be a viable therapeutic strategy in carefully selected patients with multivessel coronary disease.     

冠心病多支病变雷帕霉素洗脱支架置入与冠状动脉旁路移植术的疗效对比

目的:对比雷帕霉素洗脱支架(SES)置入与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABO)的近期与中期临床疗效.方法:单中心回顾性连续入选2003年7月～2004年6月期间行择期血运重建的多支冠状动脉病变患者,分为CAB(;组(811例),SES组(251例).随访终点事件包括死亡、心肌梗死、脑卒中和再次血运重建等主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE).采用Kaplan-Meier方法估计无事件生存率.采用Logistic多元回归方法调整分析治疗对终点事件的相对影响.结果:随访率90.3%.中位随访时间19个月.随访30 d,CABG组MACCE的发生率高于SES组(5.4%: 1.6%,OR 3.66,95%CI 1.26～10.61),CABG组的病死率高于SES组(4.6%:1.2%,OR4.02,95%CI 1.18～13.74).至随访结束,SES组累积病死率低于CAB(;组(3.1%:7.6%,OR 0.44,95%CI0.19～0.99),但再次血运重建率高于CABG组(8.4%:1.5%,OR 6.83,95%CI 3.07～15.19),MACCE 2组间差异无统计学意义.以30 d为分期分析,CABG组30d生存率低于SES组(95.4%;98.8%,P＜0.05),2组30d后生存率差异无统计学意义(97.2%:98.3%,P＞0.05).结论:多支冠状动脉病变CABG与SES置入比较,CABG的30 d病死率高于SES置入,30 d后病死率差异无统计学意义;多支冠状动脉SES置入的中期血运重建率高于CABG.     

The medicine, angioplasty, or surgery study (MASS-II): a randomized, controlled clinical trial of three therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease: one-year results

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the relative efficacies of three possible therapeutic strategies for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD), stable angina, and preserved ventricular function. BACKGROUND: Despite routine use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), there is no conclusive evidence that either one is superior to medical therapy (MT) alone for the treatment of multivessel CAD. METHODS: The primary end point was defined as cardiac mortality, Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), or refractory angina requiring revascularization. All data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: A total of 611 patients were randomly assigned to either a CABG (n = 203), PCI (n = 205), or MT (n = 203) group. The one-year survival rates were 96.0% for CABG, 95.6% for PCI, and 98.5% for MT. The rates for one-year survival free of Q-wave MI were 98% for CABG, 92% for PCI, and 97% for MT. After one-year follow-up, 8.3% of MT patients and 13.3% of PCI patients underwent to additional interventions, compared with only 0.5% of CABG patients. At one-year follow-up, 88% of the patients in the CABG group, 79% in the PCI group, and 46% in the MT group were free of angina (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Medical therapy for multivessel CAD was associated with a lower incidence of short-term events and a reduced need for additional revascularization, compared with PCI. In addition, CABG was superior to MT for eliminating anginal symptoms. All three therapeutic regimens yielded relatively low rates of cardiac-related deaths.     

12-month outcomes of percutaneous and surgical revascularization in acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease

Early invasive strategy is one of two methods of treatment of acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation (NSTEACS). We aimed at assessing 12-month outcomes and quality of life in patients with NSTEACS and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent percutaneous or surgical revascularization. Analyzed group comprised 412 patients (92%) who were qualified for invasive treatment based on coronary angiography performed 24 hours after admission and in whom long-term follow up data was available. The inclusion criteria were: rest angina within 24 hours prior to admission and at least one of the following: ST segment depression (> or = 0.5 mm), transient (< 20 min) ST-segment elevation, negative T-waves (> or = 1 mm)in at least 2 contiguous leads, positive serum cardiac markers. Patients with single-vessel CAD or qualified for conservative treatment were excluded from the study. We analysed the rate of adverse cardiac events (death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, repeated revascularization, cardiovascular hospitalization) at one year. The quality of life was assessed using Short-Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. The rate of death was 5.3% vs 9.3% (NS), myocardial infarction 3.4% vs 0% (p = 0.054), unstable angina 20.9% vs 2.8% (p = 0.0000), repeated revascularization 12.6% vs 0% (p = 0.0001) and cardiovascular hospitalization 36% vs 22.7% (p = 0.001) in the PCI and CABG group respectively. Physical Component Summary scores were 38.7 +/- 11.6 vs 43.08 +/- 9.5, p = 0.001 in the PCI and CABG group respectively. Mental Component Summary Scores were similar in both groups (46.34 +/- 13.05 vs 45.97 +/- 11.9, NS). Conclusions: Overall mortality rate was similar in both groups. PCI patients had more frequent rate of unstable angina, rate of hospitalization and repeat revascularization. This study has shown that there is a significant difference in health-related quality of life 12 months after PCI and CABG. This difference arises from better physical function (Physical Component) for CABG surgery patients compared with PCI patients. Despite impairment of the physical health status, the mental health status (Mental Component) remained similar in both groups.     

Predictors of long‐term outcomes after bypass grafting versus drug‐eluting stent implantation for left main or multivessel coronary artery disease

Background : We assessed predictors of long‐term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus those after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug‐eluting stents (DES) in 3,230 patients with left main or multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods and Results : Data were pooled from the BEST, PRECOMBAT, and SYNTAX trials. Age, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive lung disease, left ventricular dysfunction, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were common predictors of all‐cause mortality. Diabetes mellitus, previous myocardial infarction (MI), and SYNTAX score were independent predictors of all‐cause mortality in the PCI group, but not in the CABG group. In the CABG group, age was the only risk factor for MI; left ventricular dysfunction, hypertension, and PAD were risk factors for stroke. On the other hand, in the PCI group, incomplete revascularization and previous MI were risk factors for MI; age and previous stroke for stroke. In addition, chronic kidney disease significantly correlated with a composite outcome of death, MI, or stroke in the CABG group, and incomplete revascularization and previous MI in the PCI group. Conclusions : Simple clinical variables and SYNTAX score differentially predict long‐term outcomes after CABG versus those after PCI with DES for left main or multivessel CAD. Those predictors might help to guide the choice of revascularization strategy. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Impact of stable versus unstable coronary artery disease on 1-year outcome in elective patients undergoing multivessel revascularization with sirolimus-eluting stents: a subanalysis of the ARTS II trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the impact of unstable coronary artery disease (CAD) on short- and mid-term outcomes in patients with multivessel disease treated by multiple sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) as part of ARTS II (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study Part II). BACKGROUND: The differential safety/efficacy profile of SES when implanted in patients with unstable angina (UA) in comparison with stable angina (SA) undergoing multivessel intervention is largely unknown. METHODS: Between February 2003 and November 2003, 607 patients at 45 participating centers were treated; 221 of them (36%) presented with UA. RESULTS: At 30 days, the cumulative rate of death, myocardial infarction-defined as any creatine kinase (CK)/CK-myocardial band elevation beyond the upper limit of normal-cerebrovascular accident, and repeat revascularization (i.e., major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCEs]) was 19.9% in both groups. Angiographic subacute stent occlusion was documented in 1 (0.5%) and 4 (1%) patients in the UA and SA groups, respectively. At 1 year, the cumulative incidence of MACCEs was 27.1% in the UA and 24.9% in the SA group (p = 0.56). Two late occlusions occurred, both in the SA group. After adjustment for baseline and procedural characteristics, the presence of UA was not identified as an independent predictor of MACCE (hazard ratio 0.94; 95% confidence interval 0.41 to 2.12; p = 0.88). These findings remained consistent after increasing the CK/CK-myocardial band threshold to define periprocedural myocardial infarction up to at least 3 or 5 times the upper limit of normal. CONCLUSIONS: In ARTS II, an unstable clinical presentation did not exert a negative impact on short- and mid-term outcome after SES implantation for multivessel disease. (ARTS II Trial; ; NCT00235170).     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass: the Sudbury experience

OBJECTIVE: To examine factors relating to outcomes with off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and to assess methods to improve the effectiveness of this approach SETTING: A small northern Ontario community hospital where surgical assistance, nursing familiarity with OPCAB and even anesthesiologist comfort varied DESIGN: Prospective collection of data with incremental audit of results and retrospective analysis of events METHODS: One hundred twenty-four consecutive patients, operated on by the same surgeon between April 1996 and June 2002, were selected on the basis of coronary anatomy. Progressively more complex multivessel revascularization, including that to the posterior wall, was undertaken over the course of the study period. Every attempt was made not to compromise use of arterial conduits, quality of anastomoses or completeness of revascularization. This represents the 'learning curve' of this study. MAIN RESULTS: Approximately 6% of patients developed a hemodynamic crisis requiring acute on-pump conversion. This tended to occur in patients undergoing complex multivessel OPCAB surgery and was associated with subsequent increased blood transfusion rate, operative time and mortality (2.8%), and poorer angiographic graft patency. This has led to a more cautious strategy including making the decision to proceed with OPCAB only after intraoperative assessment. CONCLUSION: 'Simple' OPCAB on easily accessible coronary arteries resulted in excellent early outcomes. Complex multivessel OPCAB for triple vessel disease involving difficult to access arteries was more demanding with higher perioperative complications and less effectiveness. Early enthusiasm for complex multivessel surgery has been gradually replaced with a more conservative use of OPCAB with improved intraoperative procedures, both of which have led to more favourable outcomes.     

Stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery in patients with low preoperative risk of coronary artery bypass grafting

INTRODUCTION: Available data indicate that stenting of the left main coronary artery (LMN) is safe and effective. Restenosis remains the main factor limiting the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AIM: To evaluate immediate and long-term results of treatment of patients with LMN disease and low preoperative risk of coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Coronary stents were implanted into LMN in 64 patients. The following strategy was applied: drug eluting stent (DES) for LMN diameter < or =3.5 mm (28 subjects) and bare metal stent (BMS) for LMN diameter >3.5 mm (36 subjects). Patients enrolled in the study underwent clinical evaluation and coronary angiography. Immediate effect of the procedure and main adverse cardiac events were assessed: death, myocardial infarction and additional target lesion or non-target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: Angiographic and clinical effectiveness of the interventions was 100%. Full revascularisation of ischaemic regions of the myocardium was performed. Mean clinical follow-up period was 9.4+/-4.0 months. Neither death nor myocardial infarction occurred. Additional PCIs were performed in 11 (17.2%) patients; however, target vessel revascularisation (TVR) rate within LMN was 9.4% (i.e. 6 subjects with BMS), and non-TVR rate was 7.8% (5 subjects). CONCLUSIONS: LMN stenting is associated with high effectiveness of PCI in patients with low operative risk. Long-term follow-up revealed low incidence of major adverse cardiac events. Strategy of selective use of DESs in the study group produced good clinical outcome. Multivessel disease with LMN stenosis was associated with high rate of additional revascularisation of other vessels. Further improvement of treatment results may be obtained by more common use of DES for multivessel disease and LMN diameters larger than 4.0 mm.     

Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary disease

BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents (DES) constitute a major breakthrough in restenosis prevention after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study compared the clinical outcomes of PCI using DES versus coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) in real-world. METHODS: From January 2003 to December 2004, 466 consecutive patients with MVD underwent revascularization, 235 by PCI with DES and 231 by CABG. The study end-point was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at the first 30 days after procedure and during follow-up. RESULTS: Most preoperative characteristics were similar in the two groups, but left main disease (24.7% vs 2.6%, P<0.001) and three-vessel disease (65% vs 54%, P = 0.02) were more prevalent in CABG group. The number of coronary lesions was also greater in CABG group (3.7 +/- 1.1 vs 3.3 +/- 1.1, P<0.001). Despite higher early morbidity (3.9% vs 0.8%, P = 0.03) associated with CABG, there were no significant differences in composite MACEs at the first 30 days between the two groups. During follow-up (mean 25+/-8 months), the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular event was similar in both groups (PCI 6.3% vs CABG 5.6%, P = 0.84). However, bypass surgery still afforded a lower need for repeat revascularization (2.8% vs 10.4%, p = 0.001). Consequently, overall MACE rate (14.5% vs 7.9%, P = 0.03) remained higher after PCI. CONCLUSION: PCI with DES is a safe and feasible alternative to CABG for selected patients with MVD. The reintervention gap was further narrowed in the era of DES. Aside from restenosis, progression of disease needs to receive substantial emphasis.     

Prognostic value of stress echocardiogram in patients with angiographically significant coronary artery disease

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of stress echocardiography in patients with angiographically significant coronary artery disease (CAD). Two hundred sixty patients (mean age 63 ± 10 years, 58% men) who underwent stress echocardiography (41% treadmill, 59% dobutamine) and coronary angiography within 3 months and without intervening coronary revascularization were evaluated. All patients had significant CAD as defined by coronary stenosis ≥70% in major epicardial vessels or branches (45% had single-vessel disease, and 55% had multivessel disease). The left ventricle was divided into 16 segments and scored on a 5-point scale of wall motion. Patients with abnormal results on stress echocardiography were defined as those with stress-induced ischemia (increase in wall motion score of ≥1 grade). Follow-up (3.1 ± 1.2 years) for nonfatal myocardial infarction (n = 23) and cardiac death (n = 6) was obtained. In patients with angiographically significant CAD, stress echocardiography effectively risk stratified normal (no ischemia, n = 91) in contrast to abnormal (ischemia, n = 169) groups for cardiac events (event rate 1.0%/year vs 4.9%/year, p = 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified multivessel CAD (hazard ratio 2.53, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 5.51, p = 0.02) and number of segments in which ischemia was present (hazard ratio 4.31, 95% confidence interval 1.29 to 14.38, p = 0.01) as predictors of cardiac events. A Cox proportional-hazards model for cardiac events showed small, significant incremental value of stress echocardiography over coronary angiography (p = 0.02) and the highest global chi-square value for both (p = 0.004). In conclusion, in patients with angiographically significant CAD, (1) normal results on stress echocardiography conferred a benign prognosis (event rate 1.0%/year), and (2) stress echocardiographic results (no ischemia vs ischemia) added incremental prognostic value to coronary angiographic results, and (3) stress echocardiography and coronary angiography together provided additive prognostic value, with the highest global chi-square value.