Large bolus dose vs. continuous infusion of cisatracurium during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether a high bolus dose of cisatracurium (8x ED95) given at induction can provide muscle relaxation for the major part of a cardiac procedure with hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, avoid important postoperative residual curarization and cause no waste of product. METHODS: Twenty patients were randomly assigned either to Group 1 (n = 10) or Group 2 (n = 10). Those in Group 1 were given cisatracurium in a high bolus dose (0.4 mg kg(-1)). Those in Group 2 received cisatracurium 0.1 mg kg(-1) at induction followed after 30 min by a continuous infusion of cisatracurium. As an escape medication in case of patient movement, a bolus dose of cisatracurium 0.03 mg kg(-1) was given. RESULTS: In Group 1 (large cisatracurium bolus dose), the clinical duration of effect (until T1/T0 = 25%) was 110 min. Six of 10 patients in Group 1 required additional boluses of cisatracurium intraoperatively. Four of these six had received an additional bolus near the end of surgery and had a train-of-four (TOF) ratio = 0 at the end. The other four patients in Group 1 had a final TOF ratio >0.9. In Group 2 (continuous cisatracurium infusion), only two patients had a TOF ratio >0.9 at the end of surgery, no patient moved and none received additional boluses. The total amount of cisatracurium used in the bolus and infusion Groups was 34.5 +/- 7.8 and 21.3 +/- 5.7 mg, respectively (P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: For continued neuromuscular block during hypothermic cardiac surgery, a high bolus dose of cisatracurium appears to be safe, although it is not an alternative to a continuous infusion, as its neuromuscular blockade does not cover the intraoperative period and a high incidence of movements occurs. In the patients who received a high bolus dose of cisatracurium, postoperative residual curarization appeared after additional boluses had been given. The consumption of cisatracurium by high bolus was significantly greater than with continuous infusion.     

Edrophonium effectively antagonizes neuromuscular block at the laryngeal adductors induced by rapacuronium, rocuronium and cisatracurium, but not mivacurium

PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy of antagonism of rapacuronium-, mivacurium-, rocuronium- and cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block at the laryngeal adductors (LA). METHODS: One hundred four patients were randomly assigned to one of eight study groups. They either received rapacuronium 1.5 mg x kg(-1), mivacurium 0.25 mg x kg(-1), rocuronium 0.9 mg x kg(-1) or cisatracurium 0.15 mg x kg(-1). Patients in each treatment group either received edrophonium (0.5 mg x kg(-1)) at 10% recovery of the first twitch (T1) of train-of-four (TOF) at the LA or were allowed to recover spontaneously from neuromuscular block. The effect of antagonism on speed of recovery of neuromuscular function at the LA was evaluated. RESULTS: The time to recovery to a TOF ratio of 0.9 at the LA, when compared to the spontaneous recovery group, was significantly shortened by the administration of edrophonium in patients receiving rapacuronium [19.2 +/- 7.8 vs 26.2 +/- 4.9 (mean +/- SD) min], rocuronium (24.7 +/- 14.3 vs 44.4 +/- 13.0 min) and cisatracurium (24.2 +/- 5.7 vs 35.1 +/- 7.6 min). Edrophonium administration did not shorten complete recovery from mivacurium-induced block (15.7 +/- 8.0 vs 17.6 +/- 6.1 min). CONCLUSION: Recovery from rapacuronium-, rocuronium- or cisatracurium- induced neuromuscular block to a TOF ratio of 0.9 as measured at the LA was shortened by the administration of edrophonium, when compared to spontaneous recovery.     

Pharmacodynamic interactions between cisatracurium and rocuronium

The onset and duration of maintenance doses of neuromuscular blocking drugs may be influenced by the original neuromuscular blocking drug used. We assessed the effect of the interaction between steroidal and benzo-isoquinolinium compounds on the clinical duration of maintenance doses of cisatracurium. Sixty adult patients undergoing anesthesia with isoflurane, nitrous oxide, and oxygen were randomized to receive the following: Group I = rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg followed by cisatracurium 0.03 mg/kg when the first twitch in the train-of-four (TOF) recovered to 25%, Group II = cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg followed by cisatracurium 0.03 mg/kg, and Group III = rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg followed by rocuronium 0.15 mg/kg. Neuromuscular blockade was monitored using acceleromyography (TOF-Guard, Boxtel, The Netherlands). The clinical duration (mean +/- SD) of the first 2 maintenance doses was 41 +/- 10, 31 +/- 7++, and 25 +/- 8++ min, and 39 +/- 11, 30 +/- 6+, 29 +/- 9* min in Groups I-III, respectively (*P < 0.05, +P < 0.01, ++P < 0.001; Group I versus II and III). Thus, the clinical duration of the first two maintenance doses of cisatracurium was prolonged when administered after rocuronium. IMPLICATIONS: We assessed the clinical effect of administering cisatracurium after an intubating dose of rocuronium in 60 patients undergoing isoflurane/nitrous oxide and oxygen anesthesia. The clinical duration of the first two maintenance doses of cisatracurium administered after rocuronium was significantly prolonged. This supports the contention that combinations of structurally dissimilar neuromuscular blocking drugs result in a synergistic effect.     

性别因素对七氟醚增强顺阿曲库铵或罗库溴铵肌松效应的影响

目的 探讨性别因素对七氟醚增强顺阿曲库铵或罗库溴铵肌松效应的影响.方法 择期全麻手术患者240例,年龄20～60岁,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,BMI 20～30 kg/m2,随机分为2组(n=120):顺阿曲库铵组和罗库溴铵组,各组按性别和麻醉药再分4个亚组(n=30):女性异丙酚组、男性异丙酚组、女性七氟醚组和男性七氟醚组.各异丙酚组靶控输注异丙酚,血浆靶浓度2～6 μg/ml,各七氟醚组吸入七氟醚,于靶控输注或待呼气末七氟醚浓度稳定于1.71%5 min后,静脉注射顺阿曲库铵0.15 mg/kg或罗库溴铵0.6 mg/kg.记录肌松起效时间、肌松作用峰值时间、T1 25%恢复时间和TOFR25%恢复时间.结果 与异丙酚麻醉比较,女性患者七氟醚麻醉时,罗库溴铵TOFR 25%恢复时间延长,顺阿曲库铵肌松作用峰值时间、T1 25%恢复时间和TOFR 25%恢复时间延长,男性患者七氟醚麻醉时,罗库溴铵起效时间缩短,肌松作用峰值时间、T1 25%恢复时间和TOFR 25%恢复时间延长,顺阿曲库铵肌松作用峰值时间、T1 25%恢复时间和TOFR 25%恢复时间延长(P＜0.05或0.01);七氟醚麻醉时与男性患者比较,女性患者罗库溴铵T1 25%恢复时间和TOFR 25%恢复时间缩短,顺阿曲库铵起效时间缩短(P＜0.05或0.01).结论 七氟醚对罗库溴铵肌松的增强作用存在性别差异,男性强于女性;对顺阿曲库铵肌松的增强作用无明显性别差异.     

Implications of the use of neuromuscular transmission monitoring on immediate postoperative extubation in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: When continuous infusions of neuromuscular blocking drugs are administered during lengthy interventions and no routine antagonism of their effects is applied, there is a dramatic incidence of residual curarization. We have examined whether the use of neuromuscular transmission monitoring results in differences in the incidence of postoperative residual curarization, the use of antagonist agents, and the endotracheal extubation rate and outcome after continuous infusion of rocuronium in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. METHODS: Twenty patients were assigned to group 1 (n = 10, non-blinded neuromuscular transmission monitoring) or group 2 (n = 10, blinded neuromuscular transmission monitoring). In group 1, patients were given rocuronium at an infusion rate of 6 microg kg(-1) min(-1). The rate was manually adjusted in order to maintain T1/T0 at 10%. In group 2, a rocuronium infusion was started 30 min after induction of anaesthesia, at a rate of 6 microg kg(-1) min(-1); this rate was left unchanged during surgery. The rocuronium infusion was discontinued on completion of all vascular anastomoses; propofol was stopped at the beginning of closure of the subcutis and pirinitramide (piritramide) 15 mg was administered intravenously. Remifentanil was discontinued at the beginning of skin closure and neostigmine (50 microg kg(-1)) administered at the end of surgery when the train-of-four ratio was < 0.9 in group 1, and routinely in group 2. A 20 min test period for spontaneous ventilation was allowed once surgery had been accomplished. When the train-of-four ratio was > or = 0.9 (group 1), patients were extubated if also breathing spontaneously, fully awake and able to follow commands. When they met the clinical criteria for normal neuromuscular function after induced blockade, patients in group 2 were extubated when fully awake and able to follow commands. RESULTS: In group 1, the rate of rocuronium infusion required to keep T1/T0 at 10% was 5 +/- 1.9 microg kg(-1) min(-1); this was not significantly different from the fixed rate in group 2 (P = 0.15). One patient in group 2 was excluded. Eight out of 10 and eight out of nine patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively, reached the extubation criteria. Three out of eight, and five out of eight, patients from groups 1 and 2, respectively, were extubated in the operating room. At that time of endotracheal extubation, all three patients from group 1, but only four of the five patients from group 2 had a train-of-four ratio > or = 0.9. In group 2, one patient was reintubated in the intensive care unit. The incidence of pharmacological reversal was high in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Although we found no additional benefit of using neuromuscular transmission monitoring, it seems an absolute necessity for safety reasons. Pharmacological antagonism was mandatory. However, in our opinion, it is not wise routinely to perform immediate postoperative extubation in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.     

Residual paralysis induced by either vecuronium or rocuronium after reversal with pyridostigmine

We investigated postoperative residual curarization after administration of either vecuronium or rocuronium with reversal by pyridostigmine in 602 consecutive patients without perioperative neuromuscular monitoring. On arrival in the recovery room, neuromuscular function was assessed both by acceleromyography in a train-of-four (TOF) pattern and also clinically by the ability to sustain a head-lift for >5 s and the tongue-depressor test. Postoperative residual curarization was defined as a TOF ratio <0.7. One fifth of 602 patients (vecuronium, 24.7%; rocuronium, 14.7%) had a TOF <0.7 in the recovery room. There were no significant differences in the TOF ratios between 10 mg and 20 mg of pyridostigmine. The patients with residual block had several associated factors: the absence of perioperative neuromuscular monitoring, the use of pyridostigmine, which is less potent than neostigmine, a larger dose of vecuronium, shorter time from the last neuromuscular blocker to TOF monitoring, or peripheral cooling. We conclude that significant residual neuromuscular block after vecuronium or rocuronium was not eliminated even with reversal by a large dose of pyridostigmine. IMPLICATIONS: Without monitoring, the significant residual neuromuscular block after vecuronium or rocuronium is not eliminated even by reversal with a large dose of pyridostigmine and can still be a problem in the recovery room.     

Influence of neostigmine on the course of neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium or cisatracurium: a randomized, double-blind trial

OBJECTIVES: To compare the time-course of neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium or cisatracurium during intravenous anesthesia, in terms of both the time to spontaneous recovery or time to reversal after administration of neostigmine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients classified as ASA 1-2 were randomized to receive blinded administration of a single injection of twice the 95% effective dose of rocuronium or cisatracurium for general anesthesia, and then neostigmine plus atropine at recovery of the first train-of-4 (TOF) twitch at 5% or 25%, or normal saline solution as placebo at recovery of the first TOF twitch at 25%. The neuromuscular blockade was monitored by acceleromyography. Intergroup comparisons were carried out by Student t test and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled. Mean (SD) time to onset was faster with rocuronium at (1.04 [0.32] minutes) compared with cisatracurium at (2.58 [0.81] minutes) and duration was shorter: time to the first twich at 5% was 30 (6.4) minutes with rocuronium and 38.1 (9.7) minutes with cisatracurium. The total duration of blockade (time to the 80% TOF ratio) was also shorter with rocuronium when the neuromuscular blockade was reversed, but there were no differences in the time to block reversal when neostigmine was not used: 62 (18.9) minutes to recovery from the rocuronium blockade vs 66.96 (15.9) minutes to recover from a cisatracurium blockade. A high percentage of patients had less than an 80% TOF ratio at 60 and 90 minutes of administration of the neuromuscular blockerswhen reversal was not used (patients receiving rocuronium, 60% at 60 minutes, and 20% at 90 minutes; patients receiving cisatracurium, 80% at 60 minutes, and 40% at 90 minutes). CONCLUSION: Not antagonizing a rocuronium- or cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade in surgical procedures lasting less than 90 minutes can lead to a high percentaje of residual blockade (TOF ratio <80%).     

Sugammadex given for rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in infants: a retrospectıve study

Study ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of sugammadex in reversing profound neuromuscular block induced by rocuronium in infant patients.DesignRetrospective observational study.SettingUniversity teaching hospital.PatientsTwenty-six infants (2-12 months of age; 3-11 kg) with an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I, II, or III who were scheduled to undergo neurosurgical procedures were included in the study.InterventionsAnesthesia was induced with 5 mg/kg thiopental, 1 μg/kg fentanyl and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. Sevoflurane was administered to all patients after intubation.MethodsThe neuromuscular block was monitored with acceleromyography using train-of-four (TOF) stimuli. Patients received additional doses of rocuronium to maintain a deep block during surgery. If profound neuromuscular block (TOF, 0) persisted at the end of the surgery, 3 mg /kg sugammadex was administered.MeasurementsThe demographic data, surgeries, and anesthetic agents were recorded. The time from sugammadex administration to recovery of neuromuscular function (TOF ratio, >0.9) and complications during and after extubation were also recorded.Main resultsTwenty-six infants who had a deep neuromuscular block (TOF, 0) at the end of surgery received 3 mg/kg sugammadex. The mean recovery time of the T4/T1 ratio of 0.9 was 112 seconds. No clinical evidence of recurarization or residual curarization was observed.ConclusionsThe efficacy and safety of sugammadex were confirmed in infant surgical patients for reversal of deep neuromuscular block induced by rocuronium.     

Cisatracurium in cardiac surgery--continuous infusion vs. bolus administration

The aim of this study was the comparison of infusion vs. intermittent bolus administration of cisatracurium (CA) following cardiac surgery with regard to total intraoperative dose and time of recovery from neuromuscular blockade. From June 2005 to April 2006 sixty ASA II-III patients who were undergoing coronary bypass graft and valve replacement surgery, were equally divided and randomized to receive either intermittent bolus (Group A, n = 30) or continuous infusion (Group B, n = 30) of CA in Madani Heart Center in the Tabriz (Iran). Total intraoperative dose of CA and time to TOF ratio = 0.8 after operation were measured. Anesthesia technique in two groups was the same. All of the patients underwent cardiopulmonary bypass. Intensity of neuromuscular blockade maintained on one train-of-four (TOF) twitch response of adductor pollicis during operation. Mean received dose of CA was 32.8 +/- 20.6 micro/kg/hr in Group A and 89.7 +/- 39.4 micro/kg/hr in Group B (p = 0.003). Total intraoperative dose of CA was 23.6 +/- 4.9 mg in Group A and 39.2 +/- 10.1 mg in Group B (p = 0.001). Spontaneous recovery from neuromuscular blockade in ICU (TOF ratio = 0.8) was reached in 43.8 +/- 9.2 min in Group A, and 64.2 +/- 15.1 min in Group B (p = 0.0001). Intubation time in ICU was not significantly different (Group A = 8.3 +/- 5.1 hrs vs. Group B = 10.2 +/- 6.2 hrs, p = 0.256). These results support the intermittent bolus administration of cisatracurium in cardiac surgery following cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Antagonism of cisatracurium and rocuronium block at a tactile train-of-four count of 2: should quantitative assessment of neuromuscular function be mandatory?

With a train-of-four (TOF) ratio >0.70 as the standard of acceptable recovery, postoperative residual paralysis is a frequent occurrence in postanesthesia care units (PACUs). However, detailed information regarding prior anesthetic management is rarely provided. We examined the incidence of postoperative weakness after the administration of cisatracurium and rocuronium when using a rigid protocol for muscle relaxant and subsequent neostigmine administration. Under desflurane, N(2)O, and opioid anesthesia, tracheal intubation was accomplished after either cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg or rocuronium 0.60 mg/kg. The response of the thumb to ulnar nerve stimulation was estimated by palpation. Additional increments of muscle relaxant were given as needed to maintain the TOF count at 1 or 2. At the conclusion of surgery, at a TOF count of 2, neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg plus glycopyrrolate 10 micro g/kg was administered. The mechanical TOF response was then measured with a force transducer starting 5 min postreversal. Patients were observed until a TOF ratio of 0.90 was achieved. There were no significant differences in the recovery profiles of cisatracurium versus rocuronium. TOF ratios at 10 min postreversal were 0.72 +/- 0.10 and 0.76 +/- 0.11, respectively. At 15 min postreversal, only one subject in each group had a TOF ratio of <0.70. No patient in either group arrived in the PACU with a TOF ratio <0.70. Our results suggest that if cisatracurium or rocuronium is administered by using the TOF count as a guide, critical episodes of postoperative weakness in the PACU should be an infrequent occurrence. IMPLICATIONS: After the administration of cisatracurium or rocuronium, train-of-four (TOF) ratios <0.70 should rarely be observed in the postanesthesia care unit if neostigmine-assisted antagonism of residual block is delayed until the tactile TOF count at the thumb is 2 or more.     

Infusion requirements and reversibility of rocuronium at the corrugator supercilii and adductor pollicis muscles

Background: The aim of this study is to compare the infusion rates required to maintain a constant neuromuscular block and the reversibility of rocuronium at the corrugator supercilii muscle (CSM) and the adductor pollicis muscle (APM).
Methods: We randomly allocated 30 female patients into two groups of 15 patients each to monitor neuromuscular block at either the CSM or the APM. After induction of anaesthesia and laryngeal mask insertion, contraction of the CSM to the facial nerve stimulation or that of the APM to the ulnar nerve stimulation was quantified using an acceleromyograph during 1.0–1.5% end-tidal sevoflurane anaesthesia. All the patients received a bolus of 1 mg/kg rocuronium. When the first twitch (T1) of train-of-four (TOF) recovered to 10% of the control, rocuronium infusion was commenced and maintained at T1 of 10% of the control at the CSM or APM for 120 min. Immediately after rocuronium infusion was discontinued, the time required for 0.04 mg/kg neostigmine-facilitated recovery to a TOF ratio of 0.9 was recorded.
Results: Rocuronium infusion dose after a lapse of 120 min was significantly larger in the CSM than in the APM [7.1 (2.3) vs. 4.7 (2.6) μg/kg/min; P =0.001]. The time for facilitated recovery was shorter in the CSM than in the APM [11.4 (3.8) vs. 16.2 (6.0) min; P =0.016].
Conclusion: A larger rocuronium infusion dose was required to maintain a constant neuromuscular block at the CSM. Neostigmine-mediated reversal was faster at the CSM.     

Recovery from neuromuscular blockade after either bolus and prolonged infusions of cisatracurium or rocuronium using either isoflurane or propofol-based anesthetics

We examined the recovery characteristics of cisatracurium or rocuronium after bolus or prolonged infusion under either isoflurane or propofol anesthesia. Sixty patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures of at least 5 h were randomized to receive either isoflurane with fentanyl (Groups 1 and 2) or propofol and fentanyl (Groups 3 and 4) as their anesthetic. Groups 1 and 3 received cisatracurium 0.2 mg/kg IV bolus, spontaneously recovered, after which time an infusion was begun. Groups 2 and 4 received rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg IV, spontaneously recovered, and an infusion was begun. Before the end of surgery, the infusion was stopped and recovery of first twitch (T(1)), recovery index, clinical duration, and train-of-four (TOF) recovery was recorded and compared among groups by using appropriate statistical methods. Clinical duration was shorter for rocuronium compared with cisatracurium using either anesthetic. Cisatracurium T(1) 75% recovery after the infusion was shorter with propofol compared with isoflurane. Cisatracurium TOF 75% recovery was similar after either bolus or infusion, but rocuronium TOF 75% recovery after the infusion was delayed. Infusion rates decreased for cisatracurium but remained relatively constant for rocuronium regardless of the anesthetic used. Isoflurane enhances the effect of both muscle relaxants but prolonged cisatracurium recovery more than rocuronium. Of the two muscle relaxants studied, rocuronium's recovery was most affected by length of the infusion. Cisatracurium may be a more desired muscle relaxant for prolonged procedures because recovery was least affected by prolonged infusion. Implications: This study describes the effect of different anesthetic techniques on the recovery of two different muscle relaxants, cisatracurium and rocuronium, when administered as either a single bolus or prolonged infusion during neurosurgery. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using these relaxants for these prolonged procedures.     

Incidence and duration of residual paralysis at the end of surgery after multiple administrations of cisatracurium and rocuronium

In a randomised, controlled, double-blind, multicentre trial in 338 patients, we assessed the incidence of residual paralysis following administration of cisatracurium or rocuronium. The incidence at the end of surgery was significantly lower in patients treated with rocuronium (62 of 142 patients, 44%) than in those given cisatracurium (99 of 175 patients, 57%) (p < 0.05). In contrast, with rocuronium the mean (SD) time between skin closure and extubation was 28 (28) min vs 18 (19) min for cisatracurium, and the duration 0.9 (time from administration of last top-up dose to recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.9) was significantly longer and more variable for rocuronium than for cisatracurium. Thus, after repeated administration, the duration and variability of duration of action are greater with rocuronium compared with cisatracurium. These pharmacodynamic differences do not necessarily translate into a higher incidence of residual paralysis, because clinicians compensate for the longer duration of action and variability of rocuronium by terminating administration of the neuromuscular blocking earlier.     

Effect of an intravenous infusion of lidocaine on cisatracurium‐induced neuromuscular block duration: a randomized‐controlled trial

Background: Intravenous lidocaine can be used intraoperatively for its analgesic and antihyperalgesic properties but local anaesthetics may also prolong the duration of action of neuromuscular blocking agents. We hypothesized that intravenous lidocaine would prolong the time to recovery of neuromuscular function after cisatracurium. Methods: Forty‐two patients were enrolled in this randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Before induction, patients were administered either a 1.5 mg/kg bolus of intravenous lidocaine followed by a 2 mg/kg/h infusion or an equal volume of saline. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained using propofol and remifentanil infusions. After loss of consciousness, a 0.15 mg/kg bolus of cisatracurium was administered. No additional cisatracurium injection was allowed. Neuromuscular function was assessed every 20 s using kinemyography. The primary endpoint was the time to spontaneous recovery of a train‐of‐four (TOF) ratio ≥0.9. Results: The time to spontaneous recovery of a TOF ratio ≥0.9 was 94 ± 15 min in the control group and 98 ± 16 min in the lidocaine group (P=0.27). Conclusions: No significant prolongation of spontaneous recovery of a TOF ratio ≥0.9 after cisatracurium was found in patients receiving intravenous lidocaine.     

Atracurium, cisatracurium, vecuronium and rocuronium in patients with renal failure

AIM: The cumulative index, the recovery, the onset and the duration of action, of atracurium, cisatracurium, vecuronium and rocuronium in uremic patients undergoing kidney transplantation compared to healthy patients undergoing general surgery were studied. METHODS: In all patients (64 uremic vs 62 "healthy" patients) after anesthesia induction, atracurium 0.5 mgxkg(-1) or cisatracurium 0.15 mgxkg(-1) or vecuronium 0.1 mgxkg(-1) or rocuronium 0.6 mgxkg(-1) were administered, and at the end of surgery when T1 reached 25% neostigmine 0.05 mgxkg(-1) was given. Neuro-muscu-lar transmission was monitored by accelerometry (TOF-GUARD, Organon). RESULTS: Cumulative index of vecuronium (1.3+/-0.1 vs 1.06+/-0.11, p<0.001) and rocuronium (1.45+/-0.18 vs 1.04+/-0.16, p<0.001), recovery index (time of T1 25-75) of atracurium (14.2+/-5 vs 9+/-4, p<0.005), cisatracurium (18.7+/-3 vs 9.1, p<0.001), vecuronium (18.5+/-3 vs 12.5+/-3, p<0.001) and rocuronium (18+/-6 vs 11+/-4, p<0.001) and interval T1 25% to TOF 0.8 of cisatracurium (20.5+/-1.2 vs 16+/-2.1, p<0.001) and vecuronium (27+/-6.3 vs 20+/-3.3, p<0.001) were longer in uremic patients. The onset time and the duration of action of atracurium, cisatracurium, vecuronium and rocuronium were similar in all groups compared to controls one. CONCLUSION: In patients with renal failure the use of atracurium, cisatracurium, vecuronium and rocuronium is suitable and predictable in terms of onset, and duration of action. Care has to be taken to vecuronium and rocuronium cumulative index. Neuromuscular trasmission has to be always monitored.     

Neostigmine antagonism of rocuronium block during anesthesia with sevoflurance, isoflurane or propofol

PURPOSE: To examine the influence of continuing administration of sevoflurane or isoflurane during reversal of rocuronium induced neuromuscular block with neostigmine. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients, divided into three equal groups, were randomly allocated to maintenance of anesthesia with sevoflurane, isoflurane or propofol. Neuromuscular block was induced with rocuronium and monitored using train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve and recording the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle. Neostigmine was administered when the first response in TOF had recovered to 25%. At this time the volatile agent administration was stopped or propofol dosage reduced in half the patients in each group (n = 20 in each group). The times to attain TOF ratio of 0.8, and the number of patients attaining this end point within 15 min were recorded. RESULTS: The times (mean +/- SD) to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.8 were 12.0 +/- 5.5 and 6.8 +/- 2.3 min in the sevoflurane continued and sevoflurane stopped groups, 9.0 +/- 8.3 and 5.5 +/- 3.0 min in the isoflurane continued and isoflurane stopped groups, and 5.2 +/- 2.8 and 4.7 +/- 1.5 min in the propofol continued and propofol stopped groups (P < 0.5-01). Only 9 and 15 patients in the sevoflurane and isoflurane continued groups respectively had attained a TOF ratio of 0.8 within 15 min (P < 0.001 for sevoflurane). CONCLUSIONS: The continued administration of sevoflurane, and to a smaller extent isoflurane, results in delay in attaining adequate antagonism of rocuronium induced neuromuscular block.     

Recovery of neuromuscular block after continuous infusion of cisatracurium in patients with renal dysfunction]

OBJECTIVE: Study of the recovery of neuromuscular block after continuous infusion of cisatracurium in patients with renal dysfunction. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. PATIENTS: Forty adult patients scheduled for urological surgery were assigned to two groups according to the creatinine clearance (CC) as a measure of the renal function: group IR (CC < 60 mL.min-1) or group NR (CC > or = 60 mL.min-1). METHODS: After premedication with hydroxyzine, anaesthesia was induced with propofol, sufentanil and cisatracurium (0.15 mg.kg-1), and maintained using isoflurane, sufentanil and a continuous infusion of cisatracurium (0.12 mg.kg-1.h-1) adjusted for maintained a post-tetanic count < or = 5. Neuromuscular transmission was monitored at the adductor pollicis using accelerography (TOF Gard). Onset and recovery times in both groups were compared using Student's t test. RESULTS: Infusion time and total dose of cisatracurium were comparable in both groups. Onset times were 3.9 +/- 0.8 min and 3.5 +/- 0.6 min in groups IR and NR respectively. After the infusion, the time to train-of-four ratio of 0.8 were not different in both groups: 77 +/- 18 min (group IR) and 73 +/- 13 min (group NR). However, the spontaneous recovery intervals 25%-75% were delayed in group IR (20 +/- 9 min vs 14 +/- 5 min p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There are minor differences in the pharmacodynamics of cisatracurium between patients with normal or impaired renal function. Nevertheless, a marked interindividual variability in the recovery parameters was observed in patients with renal dysfunction.     

Cisatracurium- and rocuronium-associated residual neuromuscular dysfunction under intraoperative neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative neostigmine reversal: a single-blind randomized trial

BackgroundPostoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB) is a common complication in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), but also one of the most controversial issues. Many studies and trials demonstrated that some methods and techniques can reduce the incidence and the extent of the phenomenon.Study ObjectiveTo determine the incidence of RNMB in the PACU at standardized times after extubation with the implementation of a protocol of careful neuromuscular blockade management.DesignRandomized, single-blinded controlled clinical trial.SettingOperating room and PACU.PatientsA total of 120 patients of either sex with American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 1, 2, and 3, aged 18 to 80 years were scheduled to undergo elective abdominal surgical procedures lasting for at least 60 minutes.InterventionsPatients were randomized to receive either cisatracurium (n = 60) or rocuronium (n = 60) at the time of intubation and during surgery. Every patient received quantitative neuromuscular monitoring during general anesthesia. On completion of surgery, patients were given neostigmine 0.05 mg kg⁻¹. Patients were extubated at a train-of-four (TOF) ratio ≥0.9.MeasurementsTOF measurements were performed 15, 30, and 60 minutes after extubation. Tolerability of neuromuscular monitoring was evaluated with a scale from 1 to 10 (with 1 meaning no discomfort at all and 10 meaning maximal discomfort or pain).ResultsSix, 11, and 14 patients (5.0%, 9.2%, and 11.7%) exhibited a TOF ratio <0.9 at 15, 30, and 60 minutes after extubation, respectively. No statistically significant difference in the postoperative RNMB between cisatracurium and rocuronium was found. The median tolerability score for neuromuscular monitoring was 3.ConclusionCareful conduction, monitoring, and subsequent reversal of neuromuscular block may allow for obtaining considerably low incidence of residual neuromuscular block. However, our trial shows that some mid- and long-term cases of TOF ratios <0.9 can still occur, possibly jeopardizing the patients' postoperative recovery.     

Magnesium‐induced recurarisation after reversal of rocuronium‐induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex

A 61‐year‐old woman (57 kg, 171 cm) underwent surgery under general anaesthesia with desflurane 5.8–6.1 vol. % end‐tidal, remifentanil 0.2–0.4 μg/kg/min and rocuronium 35 mg (0.61 mg/kg). On return of the second twitch in the train‐of‐four (TOF) stimulation measured by acceleromyography, sugammadex 120 mg (2.1 mg/kg) was given. After complete neuromuscular recovery, magnesium sulphate 3600 mg (60 mg/kg) was injected intravenously over 5 min to treat atrial fibrillation. This was associated with recurarisation with a nadir [first twitch = 25%, TOF ratio (TOFR) = 67%] 7 min after the start of the magnesium sulphate infusion (magnesium plasma level: 2.67 mM). A spontaneous twitch value and a TOFR of > 90% were observed 45 min after the beginning of the magnesium sulphate infusion under general anaesthesia. Rapid infusion of magnesium sulphate may re‐establish a sugammadex‐reversed, rocuronium‐induced neuromuscular block during general anaesthesia, probably because of the high plasma level of magnesium (2.67 mM). Desflurane and a small fraction of unbound rocuronium may amplify the known muscle relaxing effects of magnesium. Intravenous injection of magnesium sulphate is not recommended in patients after general anaesthesia with neuromuscular relaxants, particularly after sugammadex reversal. Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring should be used for reversing aminosteroid muscle relaxants with sugammadex ? particularly in combination with magnesium injection ? to prevent post‐operative residual curarisation.