Cytomegalovirus as a risk factor in living-related renal transplantation. A prospective study.

Forty-four living-related donor kidney (LRD) recipients (19 HLA-identical and 25 haploidentical) were followed prospectively to determine the posttransplant incidence and sequelae of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection as they relate to the CMV status of recipients and donors. CMV titers were measured in all patients before transplantation by an immunofluorescent assay (IFA). Recipients similarly had CMV titers measured at selected intervals after transplant and during febrile episodes. Appropriate viral cultures were simultaneously performed. Laboratory evidence of infection was correlated with symptoms and signs of active CMV disease. Mean follow-up period was 20 +/- 12 months with a range of 3-51 months. Three patients were excluded due to early acute rejection resulting in graft loss. Twenty-eight of 41 donors (68%) and 22 of 41 recipients (54%) had positive CMV titers before transplantation. Six of 41 recipients (15%) subsequently developed clinical and laboratory evidence of CMV infection: three of 19 seronegative recipients and three of 22 seropositive recipients. All six patients received kidneys from seropositive donors. Four patients had severe CMV disease (2 seronegative, 2 seropositive), whereas two patients had leukopenia and fever only. Two patients with severe CMV infections subsequently lost their grafts due to unrelated causes. Overall, actual patient and graft survival of the entire group is 95% and 82%, respectively. In conclusion, individuals who receive LRD kidneys from seronegative individuals are unlikely to develop CMV infection, and transplantation of seropositive LRD kidneys may be associated with transmission of CMV in susceptible recipients regardless of their serologic status. With appropriate management of CMV illness in the posttransplant period, LRD kidney donation is safe and efficacious and should not be discouraged on the basis of pretransplant CMV serology in any donor-recipient pairing.     

Identification of patients at risk of symptomatic cytomegalovirus infection after open-heart surgery

In a prospective study, 58 consecutive patients submitted to open-heart surgery were followed from the preoperative period up to 3 months postoperatively with regard to clinical status, cytomegalovirus (CMV) antibodies and signs of enzymatic liver damage. Forty-eight patients (83%) were seropositive prior to operation. Of the ten (17%) preoperatively seronegative patients, five became CMV-seropositive during follow-up. Of the 48 initially seropositive patients, nine showed heightened CMV-antibody titers after the operation. Significant symptomatic CMV illness with protracted fever developed in four patients, all from the group of five with seroconversion. All five of these patients had enzymatic liver damage. The incidence of symptomatic CMV infection after open-heart surgery in CMV-negative patients probably is higher than previously assumed, while CMV-positive patients seem to have complete protection against CMV morbidity.     

Gancyclovir prophylaxis in high risk patients

The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease between seronegative recipients who received a CMV seropositive kidney (D+/R-) and seropositive recipients who received a CMV seropositive kidney (D+/R+). Among 42 patients included in the study, 26 were D+/R-, and the other 16 were D+/R+. Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine (n = 12), tacrolimus (n = 28), or other agents (n = 2). Twenty-four seronegative patients were treated with gancyclovir for 3 months. The 16 D+/R+ patients did not receive CMV prophylaxis. Two D+/R- patients did not receive gancyclovir prophylaxis because of various health problems just after the surgery. Over the year post-renal transplant, there were 10 (23.8%) episodes of CMV disease. The two D+/R- patients who were not treated with gancyclovir developed CMV disease. The incidence of disease was higher in patients who were given cyclosporine (41.7% vs 17.9%). In conclusion, sero negative patients who received a kidney from a seropositive donor had greater risk of developing CMV disease. Despite gancyclovir treatment, the incidence was higher than in D+/R+ cases without treatment.     

The role of pretransplant immunity in protection from cytomegalovirus disease following renal transplantation

To determine the extent to which pretransplant immunity resulting from natural infection protects against cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease, we analyzed CMV serology on 153 kidney donor and recipient pairs and followed transplant patients to determine incidence and severity of CMV disease. The overall incidence of CMV disease was 22%. Significant differences occurred in CMV disease incidence and severity, depending on the immune status of the kidney donor and recipient. Among recipients of kidneys from seropositive donors, immunity offered significant protection from CMV disease, reducing its incidence from 61% in nonimmune to 24% in immune patients (P less than 0.01). Pretransplant immune patients also had fever CMV-related complications. Among recipients of kidneys from seronegative donors, pretransplant immunity conferred a significant risk of CMV disease; immune patients had a 20% incidence of CMV disease compared with 2% in nonimmune patients (P less than 0.02). Disease was generally mild in all patients receiving kidneys from CMV infection had a 3-fold higher incidence of CMV disease than patients with reactivation infection (P less than 0.01). The incidence of CMV disease was similar in immune patients, whether they received a kidney from a seropositive or a seronegative donor. However, an important observation was that disease was significantly more severe in immune patients receiving a kidney from a seropositive donor (P less than 0.05). This indicates that if kidneys from seropositive donors are selected for use only in seropositive recipients, this places the immune patient at a higher risk for severe CMV disease. We conclude that pretransplant immunity offers a significant advantage to patients receiving kidneys from seropositive donors.     

Symptomatic cytomegalovirus disease in the cytomegalovirus antibody seropositive renal transplant recipient treated with OKT3.

A prospective study to investigate risk factors for CMV disease was conducted in 94 renal transplant recipients. CMV disease was defined as either unexplained fever for greater than 3 days with viremia or unexplained fever for greater than 3 days with isolation of CMV from the urine or throat wash and at least one of the following: leukopenia, elevated serum alanine aminotransferase, or biopsy-proved invasive tissue infection of the lung or gastrointestinal tract. Fifty-three patients received immunosuppressive regimens consisting of prednisone and cyclosporine, with or without azathioprine. The remaining 41 patients were treated with these agents plus OKT3 (21 received OKT3 to treat rejection, 20 received OKT3 prophylactically). Thirty-seven patients were at minimal risk of CMV disease (donor and recipient seronegative for CMV); 12 patients were at risk of primary disease (donor seropositive, recipient seronegative), and 45 were at risk of reactivation disease (recipient seropositive at the time of transplantation). The incidences of CMV disease in the 3 groups were 0%, 58%, and 36%, respectively. Although the incidence of CMV disease in patients at risk of primary disease was not influenced by the immunosuppressive regimen, immunosuppression had a profound effect on the occurrence of CMV disease in CMV-seropositive transplant recipients. The incidence of CMV disease in those receiving OKT3 was 59%; but only 21% in those who did not receive OKT3. OKT3 increased the risk of CMV disease five-fold (odds ratio 5.2 (95% confidence limits 1.4-17.5)). In the CMV-seropositive patient, OKT3 was also the most important predictor of CMV disease by multivariate analysis (P less than 0.002). A pilot study of preemptive therapy with ganciclovir (2.5 mg/kg daily during OKT3 therapy) in 17 patients decreased the incidence of CMV disease without appreciable toxicity.     

Monitoring of human cytomegalovirus infections in heart transplant recipients by pp65 antigenemia

BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic techniques offer the opportunity of early diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in immunocompromized patients at risk of developing CMV disease and syndrome. The use of CMV pp65 antigenemia as a predictor of CMV syndrome and disease in heart transplant recipient after induction therapy was studied retrospectively. METHODS: One hundred and nineteen consecutive heart transplant recipients treated with induction therapy who survived more then 14 d were monitored for CMV infection. Ninety-four recipients were seropositive for CMV. Twenty-five recipients were seronegative for CMV and received grafts from seropositive donors. Pre-emptive therapy was used in seropositive patients when CMV pp65 antigenemia was greater than 50 antigen-positive cells per 2 x 10(5) peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL); prophylactic therapy was done only in seronegative recipient matched with seropositive donor. RESULTS: High-level CMV pp65 antigenemia (50 antigen-positive cells 2 x 10(5) PBL) occurred in 34% (41 of 119) of patients at a median of 44 d following transplantation. In seropositive recipients, 16% (15 of 94) of patients developed CMV invasive disease or syndrome, and in seronegative recipients 20% (5 of 25) of patients developed CMV disease or syndrome. Sixty-six per cent (62 of 94) of CMV seropositive patients were identified as not requiring pre-emptive therapy. In seropositive and seronegative recipients, the sensibility and negative predictive value of the cut-off level of 50 antigen positive cell for CMV disease and syndrome was 100%. The specificity was 79% and positive predictive value was 49%. CONCLUSION: Because of the excellent sensibility and negative predictive value of the cut-off level of 50 antigen positive cell per 2 x 10(5) PBL, application of pre-emptive therapy guided by high level of CMV pp65 antigenemia in the context of induction therapy allow to omit antiviral therapy in many at risk patients. In the context of pre-emptive and prophylactic therapy, the cut-off level of 50 antigen positive cell do not allow to predict with accuracy the development of CMV disease or syndrome.     

Role of CMV pneumonia in the development of obliterative bronchiolitis in heart-lung and double-lung transplant recipients

Obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) is the main cause of late mortality after lung transplantation. Cytomegalovirus infection has been associated with late graft failure. The aim of this study was to determine whether the development of OB was related to CMV pretransplant serological status and to CMV infections. The study group comprised 36 lung transplant recipients (27 HLT and 9 DLT) who survived more than 4 months, of whom 47% developed OB (defined by the persistence of an unexplained obstructive disease: FEV1/VC < 0,7). OB occurred more frequently: (1) in seronegative recipients with seropositive donors (8/9) than in seropositive recipients (7/19) or seronegative well-matched recipients (2/8); and (2) in patients who experienced CMV pneumonia (11/16) and CMV recurrence (11/16). Since matching seronegative recipients is the best way to prevent CMV infection, we believe that seronegative grafts must be reserved for seronegative recipients.     

Cytomegalovirus infection following renal transplantation in patients administered low-dose rituximab induction therapy

Anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab) is recently being used as a B cell-depleting agent in renal transplantation (RTx). However, the incidence of infectious complications associated with rituximab therapy remains uncertain. We evaluated the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection associated with rituximab therapy in RTx. A total of 83 patients were enrolled. The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of tacrolimus or cyclosporin, mycophenolate mofetil, methylprednisolone and basiliximab. In 54 patients, only one dose of rituximab (200 or 500 mg/kg body weight) was given before RTx. A total of 25 of 43 (58.1%) recipients who were CMV seropositive prior to RTx and who received rituximab induction therapy developed CMV infection, compared to 18 of 24 (75%) CMV seropositive recipients who did not receive rituximab therapy ( P  = 0.1676). A total of 8 of 11 patients who were CMV seronegative prior to RTx and who received rituximab developed CMV infection. However, CMV seroconversion was seen in all 8 of these infected patients. Low-dose rituximab induction therapy in renal transplant recipients appears to have no influence on the incidence of CMV infection and CMV seroconversion. However, we have to consider anti-CMV prophylaxis therapy, because of high incidents of CMV infection, especially for CMV seronegative recipients who received rituximab.     

Primary and reactivated HHV8 infection and disease after liver transplantation: a prospective study

Human herpesvirus 8 (HHV8) is pathogenic in humans, especially in cases of immunosuppression. We evaluated the risk of HHV8 transmission from liver donors, and its clinical impact in southern Italy, where its seroprevalence in the general population is reported to be as high as 18.3%. We tested 179 liver transplant recipients and their donors for HHV8 antibodies at the time of transplantation, and implemented in all recipients a 12-month posttransplant surveillance program for HHV8 infection. Of the 179 liver transplant recipients enrolled, 10.6% were HHV8 seropositive before transplantation, whereas the organ donor's seroprevalence was 4.4%. Eight seronegative patients received a liver from a seropositive donor, and four of them developed primary HHV8 infection. Two of these patients had lethal nonmalignant illness with systemic involvement and multiorgan failure. Among the 19 HHV8 seropositive recipients, two had viral reactivation after liver transplantation. In addition, an HHV8 seronegative recipient of a seronegative donor developed primary HHV8 infection and multicentric Castleman's disease. In conclusion, primary HHV8 infection transmitted from a seropositive donor to a seronegative liver transplant recipient can cause a severe nonmalignant illness associated with high mortality. Donor screening for HHV8 should be considered in geographic areas with a high prevalence of such infection.     

The adverse impact of cytomegalovirus infection on clinical outcome in cyclosporine-prednisone treated renal allograft recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was diagnosed in 28% (n = 144) of 516 renal allograft recipients treated with cyclosporine-prednisone (CsA-Pred) immunosuppressive therapy. The majority of infections produced either asymptomatic (n = 37) or mild-to-moderate (n = 75) clinical disease, while 10% were lethal (n = 14). Transplantation from a seropositive donor to a seronegative recipient was associated with an increased incidence of (CMV) infection but did not predispose to more severe clinical disease. Similarly, donor source (cadaver [CAD] vs. living-related donor [LRD]), age greater than or equal to 45 years, and antecedent pulse steroid therapy for the treatment of acute rejection were not correlated with clinically more severe disease. An increase in serum creatinine to greater than or equal to 25% of preinfection nadir values occurred in association with CMV infection in 106 patients, returning to nadir values or below in 74.5% of these individuals. CMV infection did not impact on actual patient survival among recipients of LRD or CAD allografts or on actual 1-year HLA-haploidentical or HLA-identical LRD graft survival. In contrast, actual 1-year cadaveric graft survival was significantly lower among CMV-infected (n = 95) vs. uninfected (n = 198) patients (75.8% vs. 87.8%, P = .01). In association with the finding of reduced actual 1-year CAD graft survival, CMV-infected patients were found to be more predisposed to develop acute rejection episodes. Of the CMV-infected CAD graft recipients, 48.4% developed greater than or equal to 1 acute rejection episode during the first year following transplantation vs. 25.3% of their uninfected counterparts (P less than .001). The impact of CMV infection in CsA-Pred treated renal transplant recipients does not differ substantially from that reported historically in association with prednisone-azathioprine immunosuppressive therapy.     

Impact of cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin on outcome after cardiothoracic transplantation: a comparative study of combined prophylaxis with CMV hyperimmune globulin plus ganciclovir versus ganciclovir alone.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease was previously shown to be unaltered by a 28-day course of ganciclovir compared with placebo in seronegative recipients of hearts from seropositive donors (D+/R-). This study tests the hypothesis that a combination of ganciclovir plus CMV hyperimmune globulin (CMVIG) is more effective than ganciclovir alone for preventing acute CMV illness and its long-term sequelae. METHODS: The study population receiving CMVIG (n=80) included 27 heart transplant recipients (D+/R-) and 53 heart-lung and lung transplant recipients (R+ and/or D+). Each group was matched with historical controls who underwent transplantation within the preceding 2-3 years. Outcome measures compared were as follows: 3-year incidence of CMV disease; fungal infection; acute rejection; survival; rates and severity of transplant coronary artery disease (in heart patients) defined by intimal thickness (ultrasound) and coronary artery stenosis (angiographic); and incidence and death from obliterative bronchiolitis defined by pathological criteria on endobronchial biopsy specimens (in heart-lung/lung patients). RESULTS: Patients treated with CMVIG had a higher disease-free incidence of CMV, lower rejection incidence, and higher survival rate compared with the patients treated with ganciclovir alone. The coronary artery intimal thickness and the prevalence of intimal thickening were lower in the patients receiving CMVIG. Heart-lung and lung transplant patients treated with CMVIG had lower incidences of obliterative bronchiolitis and death from obliterative bronchiolitis and longer survival compared with the patients treated with ganciclovir alone. CONCLUSIONS: CMVIG plus ganciclovir seems to be more effective that ganciclovir alone for preventing the sequelae of CMV infection. A prospective randomized study is required to confirm these observations.     

Successful prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus disease after primary CMV exposure in liver transplant recipients.

During a 38-month period, we studied 320 liver transplants in 283 recipients (202 adults, 81 children). CMV disease was documented in 85 patients (30.0%) The major risk factor for CMV disease was primary CMV exposure (transplanting a seropositive allograft into a seronegative recipient). A total of 42 patients (14.8%) had primary CMV exposure. Twenty-one patients were historical controls, while the next 21 received prophylaxis for CMV infection in a nonrandomized trial of consecutive study groups. The regimen of prophylaxis consisted of intravenous immune globulin (IgG; 0.5 g/kg) at weekly intervals for 6 weeks and acyclovir for 3 months. CMV prophylaxis resulted in a dramatic reduction in the incidence of CMV disease (71.4% vs. 23.8%, (P less than 0.01). All cases of CMV were treated with intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg b.i.d. for 14 days), with 5 patients in the control group developing recurrent CMV disease (33.3% relapse). In the 16 patients receiving prophylaxis who did not develop CMV disease, all developed positive CMV-IgG titers with the passive administration of IgG. However, none developed any evidence of CMV infection or viral shedding as assessed by IgM titers and surveillance viral cultures. Four deaths occurred (all control patients), but none were related to CMV disease. Overall patient and graft survivals after primary CMV exposure were 90.5% and 82.2%, respectively, after a mean follow-up of 14 months. Conclusion: Primary CMV exposure is a major risk factor for CMV disease in liver transplant recipients. Intravenous IgG plus acyclovir is safe and effective in preventing CMV infection and disease in this setting. Because of the scarcity of donor organs, we do not advocate protective matching to avoid primary CMV exposure but rather recommend prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in this high-risk group.     

Cytomegalovirus serologic status and postoperative infection correlated with risk of developing chronic rejection after pulmonary transplantation

Twenty-seven patients received pulmonary transplants during the period since we began routine use of cytomegalovirus-seronegative blood products for CMV-seronegative recipients. Preoperative serologic status of the recipient and the occurrence of cytomegalovirus infection in the postoperative period were correlated with development of obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) as diagnosed by transbronchial biopsy (TBB). Patients included 20 heart-lung and 7 double-lung recipients. OB occurred in 18 of 27 patients. All 3 CMV seronegative recipients receiving lungs from a seropositive donor and 9 of 10 CMV recipients seropositive at the time of transplantation developed OB compared with only 6 of 14 CMV seronegative patients receiving seronegative grafts (P = 0.018). CMV infection occurred in 10/27 patients, of whom 5 were asymptomatic; 90% of these patients developed OB. Donor-specific alloreactivity, based on primed lymphocyte testing (PLT) of bronchoalveolar lavage cells was found at the time of diagnosis of OB in 23 of 27 patients. A positive PLT was significantly associated with the presence of OB (P = 0.017). We conclude that preoperative seropositive status for CMV, grafting of organs from seropositive donors, and postoperative CMV infection are significant risk factors for developing OB. That OB is, in part, an immunologically mediated form of injury and represents chronic rejection is supported by the presence of donor-specific alloreactivity in BAL lymphocytes from all recipients with OB.     

Risk factors for cytomegalovirus reactivation after CD6+ T-cell-depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Recipients of T-cell-depleted (TCD) transplants may be more susceptible to CMV infection as a result of the reduction in transferred T cell immunity. We sought to determine the effect of prior donor and patient CMV exposure on the incidence of CMV infection after TCD allogeneic HSCT. METHODS: We retrospectively examined CMV antigen testing results in all patients who had undergone CD6+ TCD related and unrelated donor allogeneic HSCT at our institution from 1996 to 1999. All 124 patients who had documented donor and recipient CMV serologies pretransplant and had undergone CMV antigen testing before day +100 posttransplant were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Forty-one percent of seropositive recipients and 1% of seronegative recipients developed evidence of CMV reactivation (odds ratio 54.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.9-424.1, P<0.001). Prior donor CMV exposure did not place seronegative recipients at increased risk of CMV conversion. Multivariable analysis indicated that prior donor CMV exposure significantly reduced the risk of CMV reactivation in seropositive recipients by 81% (odds ratio 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.91, P=0.04). Grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was associated with CMV conversion (P=0.04) when seropositive recipients underwent HSCT from CMV-negative donors, but not when the donor was CMV-seropositive (P=0.54). CONCLUSIONS: The CMV serology status of the recipient, rather than the donor, was the primary determinant of risk for CMV conversion after TCD allogeneic HSCT. Despite CD6+ T-cell depletion, immunity against CMV seemed to be transferred with the donor graft and protected seropositive HSCT recipients from CMV reactivation.     

Late-onset cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplant recipients despite antiviral prophylaxis

BACKGROUND: The incidence and impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease that occurs despite CMV prophylaxis among liver transplant recipients have been incompletely defined. METHODS: The incidence and risk factors for CMV disease during the first posttransplant year in a cohort of liver transplant recipients who received antiviral prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir were retrospectively analyzed using Cox proportional-hazard regression models. RESULTS: CMV disease developed in 19 of 259 recipients (7% [95% confidence interval 0.04-0.11]) at a median of 4.5 months posttransplant, included syndrome (63%) or tissue-invasive disease (37%), and was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality during the first posttransplant year (hazard ratio 14 [95% confidence interval 3.8-54], P=0.0007). The incidence was higher (10/38 [26%] vs. 8/180 [4.5%], P<0.0001) in seronegative recipients (R-) of an organ from a seropositive donor (D+) compared with seropositive (R+) patients, respectively. D+R- status was the only variable significantly associated with CMV disease in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Late CMV disease develops in a substantial proportion of D+R- recipients after prophylaxis is discontinued, is not accurately predicted by patient factors, and is associated with increased mortality. New strategies to identify D+R- patients at risk and to reduce the incidence and impact of late CMV disease in this group are warranted.     

Cytomegalovirus-related disease and risk of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients: a cohort study with case-control analyses

The relationship between a cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and the acute rejection of a renal transplant is not well established. The aim of the study was to document whether the clinical presentation of a CMV infection as a diffuse inflammatory disease or as a clinically asymtomatic illness is a risk factor of acute renal transplant rejection. One hundred and ninety-two consecutive renal transplant recipients were included in a historical cohort study for exposed – non exposed analyses. CMV infection after transplantation was the exposure factor. Before transplantation, 113 patients had antibodies against CMV and 79 were seronegative. The patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 consisted of 64 patients who had neither clinical signs of CMV disease nor CMV serological changes after transplantation, Group 2 consisted of 77 seropositive patients with asymptomatic viremia, and Group 3 consisted of 51 seropositive patients with clinical signs of diffuse inflammation that included fever, neutropenia, and various visceral involvements (CMV disease). Groups 2 and 3, the seropositive patients, were paired with Group 1 patients. Acute rejection was considered as CMV-induced when it occurred within one month following viremia, during the first year after transplantation. Transplant patients with CMV disease, had a significant likelihood of developing acute rejection after CMV infection or reactivation (P < 0.01). The odds ratio for developing rejection was 5.98, 95 % confidence interval: 1.21–29.40. Such a link was not documented for recipients with asymptomatic CMV infection. In conclusion, CMV disease, but not asymptomatic viremia, is a risk factor of acute renal transplant rejection. On epidemiological grounds, these results support the hypothesis that factors controlling both the viral replication and the diffuse inflammatory process are implicated in acute graft rejection. Received: 20 July 1999 Revised: 22 February 2000 Accepted: 9 June 2000     

Acyclovir plus CMV immunoglobulin prophylaxis and early therapy with ganciclovir are effective and safe in CMV high-risk renal transplant pediatric recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is still a major cause of morbidity in high-risk renal transplant recipients. In the present report, we have reviewed our records of renal transplant pediatric recipients (RTPR; mean age 14.1 ± 4.9 years) since 1991, when we started a policy of CMV prophylaxis constituting high-dose oral acyclovir plus CMV hyperimmune immunoglobulins (Hlg) followed by early i. v. ganciclovir therapy in high-risk patients (i. e., CMV donor + / recipient ?). Four patients received a kidney from a living relative (LR), 2 patients had one previous transplant, and 1 had a combined liver – kidney transplant. Thirty-three patients who were negative for CMV antibodies (ab) before transplantation received a kidney from CMV ab positive donors. The immunosuppressive regimen included cyclosporine A and steroids, with the addition of azathioprine in the 4 patients who received an LR kidney. Serial assessments for CMV antigenemia (pp 65) were routinely performed for 6 months after transplantation to define CMV infection. Among the 33 CMV seronegative recipients (R ?) who received the graft from a CMV seropositive donor (D +), 18 (54.5 %) experienced CMV infection, whereas among the 28 CMV R +, who received a graft from a CMV D +, 11 (39.3 %) experienced CMV infection. With regard to CMV ? related symptoms, only 2 patients suffered from a CMV syndrome (fever and leukopenia in 1 patient, fever and arthralgia in the other). In no case did the spectrum of CMV disease occur; only minor symptoms were present in 7 of the remaining CMV-infected patients (fever in 6 and leukopenia in 1). Rejection episodes and renal function did not differ between CMV-infected and non-CMV-infected patients. Our experiences support the use of prophylactic acyclovir plus CMV HIg followed by early therapy with i. v. ganciclovir to combat the risk of increased morbidity in high risk RTPR.     

Comparison of combined prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin plus ganciclovir versus cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin alone in high-risk heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Seronegative heart transplant recipients who receive an allograft from seropositive donors have a higher risk of developing cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and dysfunction. Neither CMV-specific hyperimmune globulin nor ganciclovir as sole CMV prophylaxis is sufficient to prevent CMV disease in high-risk patients. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of CMV-hyperimmune globulin with and without ganciclovir in 207 D+/R- heart transplant recipients. METHODS: The study population was divided into two groups: Group A was composed of 96 patients who received CMV hyperimmune globulin as sole CMV prophylaxis, and group B was composed of 111 patients who received combined CMV prophylaxis. All recipients were subjected to quadruple cytolytic immunosuppression. Primary and secondary end points included prevention of CMV-associated death, CMV disease and productive infection, CAV, and overall infection. RESULTS: There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups. Four patients in the group A died of CMV sepsis, whereas no CMV-associated death was observed in group B (P =0.0326). The actuarial incidence of CMV disease was significantly lower in patients who received double CMV prophylaxis (32.29 vs. 11.71, P =0.0003). Although no difference was observed with regard to productive CMV infection (53.12 vs. 65.77, P =not significant), CAV and overall infection rates were significantly higher in the first group (7.29 vs. 0.9, P =0.0157 and 70.83 vs. 62.16, P =0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Double CMV prophylaxis consisting of CMV hyperimmune globulin and ganciclovir is able to abolish CMV death and prevent CMV disease in high-risk heart transplant recipients. Therefore, the use of a combination regimen is recommended for seronegative recipients with seropositive donors.     

The impact of cytomegalovirus infection on seronegative recipients of seropositive donor kidneys versus seropositive recipients treated with cyclosporine-prednisone immunosuppression

To assess the impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in D+R- patients treated with cyclosporine (CsA)-prednisone immunosuppression, we compared the incidence of CMV infection, severity of disease, and the 1, 2, and 3-year actual graft and patient survival rates of CMV-infected D+R- patients with R+ patients from a group of 516 renal allograft recipients at our center. CMV infection occurred more frequently in 27/56 D+R- patients (48%) versus 111/376 R+ patients (29%) (P less than 0.01). The incidence of CMV was also significantly greater in D+R- versus R- patients receiving CAD grafts (59% vs. 32%, P less than 0.01) and first transplants (47% vs. 30%, P less than 0.05). There were no significant differences in CMV disease severity between the aggregate D+R- and R+ patient groups and when subgroups of these patients receiving cadaveric donor (CAD), living-related donor (LRD), first, or retransplant allografts were compared. The actual 1, 2, and 3-year graft survival rates for D+R- patients (68%, 58%, 68%) were not significantly different from rates in R+ patients (83%, 77%, 63%) with CMV infection. When the 1, 2, and 3-year actual graft survival rates in subgroups of D+R- and R+ patients were compared in CAD, LRD, and first and retransplants, there were no significant differences. The actual 1, 2, and 3-year patient survival rates were not significantly different between D+R- (89%, 92%, 100%) and R+ patients (94%, 91%, 86%) with CMV infection, nor were they different when CMV infected D+R- and R+ patients with CAD, LRD, first or retransplant grafts were compared. These data do not support the policy of denying a seropositive kidney to a seronegative recipient, since the severity of CMV disease and the impact of CMV infection is not significantly different comparing D+R- and R+ patients receiving CsA-prednisone immunosuppression.     

Acyclovir plus CMV immunoglobulin prophylaxis and early therapy with ganciclovir are effective and safe in CMV high-risk renal transplant pediatric recipients

Abstract Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is still a major cause of morbidity in high-risk renal transplant recipients. In the present report, we have reviewed our records of renal transplant pediatric recipients (RTPR; mean age 14.1 ± 4.9 years) since 1991, when we started a policy of CMV prophylaxis constituting high-dose oral acyclovir plus CMV hyperimmune immunoglobulins (Hlg) followed by early i.v. ganciclovir therapy in high-risk patients (i.e., CMV donor +/ recipient -). Four patients received a kidney from a living relative (LR), 2 patients had one previous transplant, and 1 had a combined liver -kidney transplant. Thirty-three patients who were negative for CMV antibodies (ab) before transplantation received a kidney from CMV ab positive donors. The immunosuppressive regimen included cyclosporin A and steroids, with the addition of azathioprine in the 4 patients who received an LR kidney. Serial assessments for CMV antigenemia (pp 65) were routinely performed for 6 months after transplantation to define CMV infection. Among the 33 CMV seronegative recipients (R -) who received the graft from a CMV seropositive donor (D +), 18 (54.5 %) experienced CMV infection, whereas among the 28 CMV R +, who received a graft from a CMV D +, 11 (39.3 %) experienced CMV infection. With regard to CMV - related symptoms, only 2 patients suffered from a CMV syndrome (fever and leukopenia in 1 patient, fever and arthralgia in the other). In no case did the spectrum of CMV disease occur; only minor symptoms were present in 7 of the remaining CMV-infected patients (fever in 6 and leukopenia in 1). Rejection episodes and renal function did not differ between CMV-infected and non-CMV-infected patients. Our experiences support the use of prophylactic acyclovir plus CMV HIg followed by early therapy with i.v. ganciclovir to combat the risk of increased morbidity in high risk RTPR.