Clinical geropsychology training in generalist doctoral programs

While a relatively small number of clinical psychology graduate programs offer specialized tracks in clinical geropsychology, the need for psychologists trained to work with older adults is increasing. This paper presents a model of training that could be adopted by generalist training programs to better prepare their students to work with older adults without creating a specialty program in geropsychology. The model identifies key domains of knowledge that should be covered, emphasizes service learning as a key element of training, provides a list of resources for faculty desiring to develop a geropsychology course, and suggests ways to overcome barriers that may prevent the implementation of the model.     

Innovative generalist programs Academic health care centers respond to the shortage of generalist physicians

Academic health care centers increasingly are exploring innovative ways to increase the supply of generalist physicians. The authors review successful innovations at representative academic health centers in the areas of recruitment and admissions, undergraduate medical education, residency training, and practice support. Lessons learned focus on those areas that have demonstrated improvements in the number and quality of physicians trained in family practice, general pediatrics, and general internal medicine. Successful recruitment of generalism-oriented applicants requires identification and tracking of rural, minority, and other special groups of students at the high school and college levels. Academic health care centers that provide early, sustained, community-based, ambulatory experiences for medical students and residents encourage trainees to maintain and choose generalist careers. Finally, academic health care centers that link with community providers and with state government encourage the retention of generalist physicians through continuing education and teaching networks.     

Preparing generalist physicians

A combination of financial, regulatory, and professional factors have led to a gradual but pronounced decline in generalist training and practice in the United States. This trend is likely to undergo dramatic reversal, however, as reflected by the diverse range of health care reform proposals incorporating incentives to promote generalist education and primary care practice. Considerable consensus has been reached by a number of professional organizations and public policy groups regarding the broad details of reform of generalist physician training, but key areas of controversy remain with important implications for academic medical centers. In addition, the generalist professional organizations, particularly those of family practice, general internal medicine, and general pediatrics, are being challenged to reconcile historic differences in the definitions and training of generalist competence. In this, the call for “retraining subspecialists” will both offer an opportunity and entail a risk. Finally, academic medical centers will need new organizational structures that can combine the distinctive intellectual traditions and the expertise of the generalist medical disciplines to develop new approaches to the education and practice of primary care.     

Training generalist physicians

To train more generalist physicians, structural changes must be made along the continuum of medical education. Future generalists require in-depth exposure to primary care practice, with substantive experience in the longitudinal management of patient panels and the opportunity to work with successful generalist role models. Clinical training and course work must incorporate a wide range of skills and disciplines, including areas now under-emphasized, such as epidemiology, health services, and psychosocial medicine. Recommendations for structural changes to increase the generalist focus of medical education include: 1) the development within institutions of central authorities, involving departments of internal medicine, family medicine, and pediatrics, in joint efforts to foster all aspects of generalist training, including recruitment, curriculum development, community linkages, innovative approaches to training, and recognition and support for successful generalist teachers; 2) commitment of a minimum of 50% of clinical training to ambulatory care settings at both medical school and residency levels; 3) required longitudinal care experiences for all medical students and a 20% or greater time commitment to longitudinal care for internal medicine, pediatrics, and family medicine residents; and 4) increased numbers of generalist faculty and enhanced teaching skills among faculty in the outpatient environment, to guarantee increased exposure of medical students and residents to generalist role models.     

Implementation issues in generalist education

Devising a strategy for the implementation of a generalist medical educational program can be aided by grouping the many issues to be addressed into developmental stages. In this way, problems can be anticipated and resources marshalled. Initially, leadership and institutional support for the program must be developed. Next, detailed financial, curricular, and site planning must be undertaken. Implementation of the program must contend with faculty, site, and trainee concerns while consolidating financial and institutional support. Finally, in institutionalizing the program, financing must be secured and ongoing evaluation should provide information necessary to regularly reassess the program and renew its goals.     

The generalist health care workforce

The generalist health care workforce in the United States is best characterized as those practitioners who deliver primary care services. These include most family physicians, general internists, general pediatricians, nurse practitioners, osteopathic family physicians, and physician assistants. Based on a variety of factors, including health care needs, managed care/HMO hiring practices, international comparisons, and health care costs, the case for increasing the amount and proportion of generalist providers is compelling. Projections strongly suggest a worsening shortfall of generalists if no change is made. Changing the career choices of medical students to promote generalism, even significantly, will take 20 years or more to have a meaningful impact. Therefore, retraining specialist physicians in oversupply to practice as generalists is an important option to consider. To best meet the nation’s health care needs, three issues need to be addressed in the context of health care reform: the creation of a “system” of generalist care that integrates into a coherent and collaborative framework the scopes of practice of the various generalist disciplines; the pursuit of a workable short-term model to convert specialist physicians into generalist physicians, led jointly by family medicine, general internal medicine, and general pediatrics; and a significant change in the medical education process to produce an ample supply of well-trained generalists.     

Implementation issues in generalist education

Devising a strategy for the implementation of a generalist medical educational program can be aided by grouping the many issues to be addressed into developmental stages. In this way, problems can be anticipated and resources marshalled. Initially, leadership and institutional support for the program must be developed. Next, detailed financial, curricular, and site planning must be undertaken. Implementation of the program must contend with faculty, site, and trainee concerns while consolidating financial and institutional support. Finally, in institutionalizing the program, financing must be secured and ongoing evaluation should provide information necessary to regularly reassess the program and renew its goals.     

Rekindling student interest in generalist careers

Despite changes in the structure of the U.S. health care system, patients continue to need and seek out generalist physicians. However, the proportion of U.S. graduates of medical schools who choose to enter generalist residency training decreased from 50% in 1998 to less than 40% in the 2004 match. Unless we act now to reverse this trend, we may face a shortage of primary care physicians to care for the complex medical needs of an aging population. This article reviews the history of and trends in career choice and proposes 4 evidence-based recommendations to rekindle student interest in generalist careers: 1) We must improve satisfaction and enthusiasm among generalist physician role models. 2) Schools of medicine should redouble their efforts to produce primary care physicians. 3) We must facilitate the pathway from medical school to generalist residency. 4) The U.S. government should increase funding for primary care research and research training. In the absence of a major overhaul of economic incentives in favor of generalist careers, we will need to work at these multiple levels to restore balance to the generalist physician workforce and align with the desires and expectations of patients for continuing healing relationships with generalist physicians.