Preparing generalist physicians

A combination of financial, regulatory, and professional factors have led to a gradual but pronounced decline in generalist training and practice in the United States. This trend is likely to undergo dramatic reversal, however, as reflected by the diverse range of health care reform proposals incorporating incentives to promote generalist education and primary care practice. Considerable consensus has been reached by a number of professional organizations and public policy groups regarding the broad details of reform of generalist physician training, but key areas of controversy remain with important implications for academic medical centers. In addition, the generalist professional organizations, particularly those of family practice, general internal medicine, and general pediatrics, are being challenged to reconcile historic differences in the definitions and training of generalist competence. In this, the call for “retraining subspecialists” will both offer an opportunity and entail a risk. Finally, academic medical centers will need new organizational structures that can combine the distinctive intellectual traditions and the expertise of the generalist medical disciplines to develop new approaches to the education and practice of primary care.     

Teaching and learning methods for new generalist physicians

This paper describes teaching and learning methods that can be used to build the competencies needed by the generalist physician. Supervised patient care, problem-based learning, and ongoing feedback through standardized patients all have proven efficacy in several domains. Computer-based learning has much to offer as a supplement to clinical teaching. New learning experiences in continuous improvement promise to cover areas that are not often reached by traditional methods, especially those of cost—effectiveness and quality of care. The authors review each method’s principles, relationship to generalist     

A survival guide for generalist physicians in academic fellowships

Summary  Generalist physicians pursuing fellowship training should develop an early strategic plan to guide them through their fellowship years. Though each fellow’s plan must be individualized, fellows should get started on independent projects early, decide how much time to allocate to various activities, strike an individualized balance between course work and independent projects, and learn how to choose and maintain relationships with mentors. Early decision making with regard to these aspects of fellowship will allow trainees to maximize their learning, development, and progress toward career goals. Presented in part as a precourse at the National Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, San Francisco, Calif, April 1999. Dr. Whooley is supported by a Research Career Development Award from the Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development Service. Dr. Saha was a fellow in the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Washington, and Health Services Research and Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System. Drs. Christakis and Saint were fellows in the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Washington, Dr. Whooley was a fellow in the Clinical Epidemiology Fellowship, San Francisco VA Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, Dr. Simon was a fellow in the Harvard General Internal Medicine Fellowship and Faculty Development Program, and the Thomas O. Pyle Fellowship in Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care.     

Training physicians about smoking cessation

Study objective:To test the hypotheses that physicians in private practice who receive a continuing education program (entitled “Quit for Life”) about how to counsel smokers to quit would counsel smokers more effectively and have higher rates of long-term smoking cessation among their patients. Design:Randomized trial with blinded assessment of principal outcomes. Setting:Private practices of internal medicine and family practice. Subjects:Forty-four physicians randomly assigned to receive training (24) or serve as controls (20) and consecutive samples of smokers visiting each physician (19.6 patients per experimental and 22.3 per control physician). Interventions:Physicians received three hours of training about how to help smokers quit. Physicians and their office staffs were also given self-help booklets to distribute to smokers and were urged to use a system of stickers on charts as reminders to counsel smokers about quitting. Measurements and main results:Based on telephone interviews with patients, physicians in the experimental group were more likely to discuss smoking with patients who smoked (64% vs. 44%), spent more time counseling smokers about quitting (7.5 vs. 5.2 minutes), helped more smokers set dates to quit smoking (29% vs. 5% of smokers), gave out more self-help booklets (37% vs. 9%), and were more likely to make a follow-up appointment about quitting smoking (19% vs. 11% of those counseled) than physicians in the control group. One year later, the rates of biochemically confirmed, long-term (≥9 months) abstinence from smoking were similar among patients in the experimental (3.2%) and control (2.5%) groups (95% confidence interval for the 0.7% difference: −1.7 to +3.1%). Conclusions:The authors conclude that this continuing education program substantially changed the way physicians counseled smokers, but had little or no impact on rates of long-term smoking cessation among their patients. There is a need for more effective strategies to help physicians help their patients to quit smoking. Supported by Grant # CA38337 from the National Cancer Institute and by the Henry J. Kaiser Foundation Faculty Fellowship in General Internal Medicine (SRC).     

传染病专科医院消化内镜专业医师的培训方法

传染病医院消化内镜操作对象与综合性医院不同,对专业人员的培训有着自身的特点。我们根据在传染病医院进行消化内镜检查和治疗患者的特点,并从传染病防治的角度制定了一套符合传染病医院要求的消化内镜从业人员的培训方法和制度。     

Differences in generalist and specialist physicians’ knowledge and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for congestive heart failure

Objective  To quantify the extent and determinants of underutilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for patients with congestive heart failure, especially with respect to physician specialty and clinical indication. Design  Survey of a national systematic sample of physicians. Participants  Five hundred family practitioners, 500 general internists, and 500 cardiologists. Measurements and main results  Physicians’ choice of medications were determined for four hypothetical patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: (1) new-onset, symptomatic; (2) asymptomatic; (3) chronic heart failure, on digitalis and diuretic; and (4) asymptomatic, post-myocardial infarction. For each patient, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that ACE inhibitors decrease mortality or the progression of symptoms. Among the 727 eligible physicians returning surveys (adjusted response rate 58%), approximately 90% used ACE inhibitors for patients with chronic heart failure who were already taking digitalis and a diuretic. However, family practitioners and general internists chose ACE inhibitors less frequently (p≤.01) than cardiologists for the other indications. Respective rates of ACE inhibitor use for each simulated patient were new-onset, symptomatic (family practitioners 72%, general internists 76%, cardiologists 86%); asymptomatic (family practitioners 68%, general internists 78%, cardiologists 93%); and asymptomatic, post-myocardial infarction (family practitioners 58%, general internists 70%, cardiologists 94%). Compared with generalists, cardiologists were more likely (p≤.05) to increase ACE inhibitors to a target dosage (45% vs 26%) and to tolerate systolic blood pressures of 90 mm Hg or less (43% vs 15%). Conclusions  Compared with cardiologists, family practitioners and general internists probably underutilize ACE inhibitors, particularly among patients with decreased ejection fraction who are either asymptomatic or post-myocardial infarction. Educational efforts should focus on these indications and emphasize the dosages demonstrated to lower mortality and morbidity in the trials. Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, Washington, DC, May 3, 1996, and American College of Cardiology, Anaheim, Calif., March 18, 1997. Funded by a grant-in-aid from the American Heart Association of Metropolitan Chicago. Dr. Chin is supported by National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging Geriatric Academic Program Award 5-K12-AG-00488.     

Adherence counseling practices of generalist and specialist physicians caring for people living with HIV/AIDS in North Carolina

CONTEXT: National guidelines recommend that practitioners assess and reinforce patient adherence when prescribing antiretroviral (ART) medications, but the extent to which physicians do this routinely is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the adherence counseling practices of physicians caring for patients with HIV/AIDS in North Carolina and to determine characteristics associated with providing routine adherence counseling. DESIGN: A statewide self-administered survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All physicians in North Carolina who prescribed a protease inhibitor (PI) during 1999. Among the 589 surveys sent, 369 were returned for a response rate of 63%. The 190 respondents who reported prescribing a PI in the last year comprised the study sample. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physicians reported how often they carried out each of 16 adherence counseling behaviors as well as demographics, practice characteristics, and attitudes. RESULTS: On average, physicians reported spending 13 minutes counseling patients when starting a new 3-drug ART regimen. The vast majority performed basic but not more extensive adherence counseling; half reported carrying out 7 or fewer of 16 adherence counseling behaviors "most" or "all of the time." Physicians who reported conducting more adherence counseling were more likely to be infectious disease specialists, care for more HIV-positive patients, have more time allocated for an HIV visit, and to perceive that they had enough time, reimbursement, skill, and office space to counsel. After also controlling for the amount of reimbursement and availability of space for counseling, physicians who were significantly more likely to perform a greater number of adherence counseling practices were those who 1). cared for a greater number of HIV/AIDS patients; 2). had more time allocated for an HIV physical; 3). felt more adequately skilled; and 4). had more positive attitudes toward ART. CONCLUSIONS: This first investigation of adherence counseling practices in HIV/AIDS suggests that physicians caring for patients with HIV/AIDS need more training and time allocated to provide antiretroviral adherence counseling services.     

Innovative generalist programs

Academic health care centers increasingly are exploring innovative ways to increase the supply of generalist physicians. The authors review successful innovations at representative academic health centers in the areas of recruitment and admissions, undergraduate medical education, residency training, and practice support. Lessons learned focus on those areas that have demonstrated improvements in the number and quality of physicians trained in family practice, general pediatrics, and general internal medicine. Successful recruitment of generalism-oriented applicants requires identification and tracking of rural, minority, and other special groups of students at the high school and college levels. Academic health care centers that provide early, sustained, community-based, ambulatory experiences for medical students and residents encourage trainees to maintain and choose generalist careers. Finally, academic health care centers that link with community providers and with state government encourage the retention of generalist physicians through continuing education and teaching networks.     

Implementation issues in generalist education

Devising a strategy for the implementation of a generalist medical educational program can be aided by grouping the many issues to be addressed into developmental stages. In this way, problems can be anticipated and resources marshalled. Initially, leadership and institutional support for the program must be developed. Next, detailed financial, curricular, and site planning must be undertaken. Implementation of the program must contend with faculty, site, and trainee concerns while consolidating financial and institutional support. Finally, in institutionalizing the program, financing must be secured and ongoing evaluation should provide information necessary to regularly reassess the program and renew its goals.     

Implementation issues in generalist education

Devising a strategy for the implementation of a generalist medical educational program can be aided by grouping the many issues to be addressed into developmental stages. In this way, problems can be anticipated and resources marshalled. Initially, leadership and institutional support for the program must be developed. Next, detailed financial, curricular, and site planning must be undertaken. Implementation of the program must contend with faculty, site, and trainee concerns while consolidating financial and institutional support. Finally, in institutionalizing the program, financing must be secured and ongoing evaluation should provide information necessary to regularly reassess the program and renew its goals.