Graduate primary care training: a collaborative alternative for family practice, internal medicine, and pediatrics

The Residency Program in Social Medicine at Montefiore Medical Center is a collaborative, integrated training program for primary care pediatricians, internists, and family physicians within one interdisciplinary organization. Since 1970 we have trained more than 200 physicians, prepared them for board certification in their specialty, emphasized the psychosocial aspects and social determinants of health and illness, and shared a faculty, curriculum, and commitment to provide medical care for inner-city, underserved populations. We discuss the program's history and curriculum, administrative and academic structure, shared "cross-track" faculty units (psychosocial; social medicine; and research, education, and evaluation), and graduates' practice outcomes. The interdisciplinary character of the Residency Program in Social Medicine helps physicians successfully serve the underserved and exemplifies that interdisciplinary medical education succeeds when interdisciplinary health care teams are organized for optimal patient care. Only the federal government has the perspective and power to foster more interdisciplinary collaboration and strengthen primary care education in a period of shrinking resources.     

Smoking cessation counseling by resident physicians in internal medicine, family practice, and pediatrics

Residents in primary care specialties care for many patients who smoke cigarettes, but little is known about their smoking cessation counseling (SCC). We surveyed 309 residents (72 family practice, 171 internal medicine, and 66 pediatrics residents) in 13 programs to determine their practices, knowledge, attitudes, and training in SCC. More than 90% thought physicians are responsible for SCC, the majority routinely took smoking histories, and 80% attempted to motivate patients to quit smoking. However, 25% or fewer reported discussing obstacles to quitting, setting a quit date, prescribing nicotine gum, scheduling follow-up visits, or providing self-help materials. Family practice residents used more SCC techniques (1.8) than did internal medicine (0.8) and pediatrics (0.1) residents. Only 54% of residents reported recent SCC training and 13% reported formal SCC training. Recent training correlated with the number of counseling techniques used. Residents in primary care specialties report positive attitudes but inadequate practice and training in SCC.     

The medical interview: a core curriculum for residencies in internal medicine

A core curriculum for teaching medical interviewing is presented that enhances the internist's skills in a broad range of interactions with patients. Learning these skills is now left to chance and is often deficient. Four objectives are developed: patient-centered interviewing and treatment; an integrated (biopsychosocial) approach to clinical reasoning and patient care; personal development of humanistic values; and psychosocial and psychiatric medicine. Teaching options include real and simulated encounters with patients, observation with discussion, and use of groups. A general strategy for implementing the curriculum at the local level requires the intellectual and financial support of the dean and department chairman, and a multidisciplinary faculty committed to developing, implementing, and evaluating the curriculum. At many programs, faculty development will be necessary.     

Ibuprofen-associated renal impairment in a large general internal medicine practice

The authors determined the incidence of ibuprofen-associated renal impairment and risk factors for its development in 1908 patients treated with ibuprofen using data from a computerized medical records system. Renal impairment occurred in 343 patients (18%). Multivariable analysis revealed six independent predictors of renal impairment: age, prior renal insufficiency, coronary artery disease, male gender, elevated systolic blood pressure, and diuretic use. They then tested the degree to which ibuprofen contributed to the development of renal impairment by evaluating a control group of 3933 acetaminophen recipients. Neither ibuprofen nor acetaminophen was among the independent predictors of risk when all patients were considered (adjusted odds ratio, 1.05; 95% Cl, 0.88-1.26). However, two subsets of at risk patients had an ibuprofen effect: patients greater than or equal to 65 years of age who received ibuprofen were at greater risk of renal impairment as compared to acetaminophen recipients (adjusted odds ratio, 1.34; 95% Cl, 1.05 to 1.72) as were patients with coronary artery disease (adjusted odds ratio, 2.54; 95% Cl, 1.38 to 4.68). Their results suggest that elderly patients and patients with coronary artery disease are at risk for ibuprofen-associated renal impairment and therefore should have their renal function monitored when ibuprofen and possibly other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are prescribed.     

Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice

The authors evaluated use of seven cancer screening tests by 52 providers in a university general internal medicine practice, using 1980 American Cancer Society (ACS) recommendations as standards for comparison. Performance rates were determined by retrospective medical record reviews of a stratified random sample of 525 patients. In addition, the 48 physicians and four nurse-practitioners in the practice were interviewed to determine their opinions, knowledge and perceived use of the tests. Performance rates were low, significantly below the ACS quidelines for all tests except Pap smear. Providers used the tests significantly more often to evaluate patients with cancer risk factors or for new patients. They significantly overestimated their own performances of six tests. More than a fourth of the providers disagreed with the use of mammography, sigmoidoscopy, pelvic or rectal examinations for screening asymptomatic adults. Their knowledge about cancer screening and the ACS recommendations was highly variable, and frequently quite limited. Providers offered four major reasons for not performing the screening tests: provider forgetfulness, lack of time, inconvenience and logistical difficulties, and patient discomfort or refusal. Received from the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, and Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Presented in part at the 111th annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, Dallas, Texas, November 1983, and at the 8th annual meeting of the Society for Research and Education in Primary Care Internal Medicine, Washington, D.C., May 1985. Supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and by PHS grant number 5 R01 CA37340, awarded by the National Cancer Institute, DHHS. Steven Schroeder, MD, Bernard Lo, MD, Steven Cummings, MD, Thomas Coates, PhD, Eliseo Perez-Stable, MD, Hal Luft, PhD, and Joyce Bird, PhD, provided helpful comments. The faculty and residents of the Division of General Internal Medicine and the General Internal Medicine Group Practice at the University of California, San Francisco, provided their interest and cooperation. Richard Meltzer, Matthew Boone, MD, and William Cunningham, MD, assisted in obtaining data.     

The content of internal medicine residency training and its relevance to the practice of medicine

Using survey items from Kern et al. (1985), 192 former residents rated their preparation in, and the importance of, three content areas of their residency training ("basic skill and knowledge areas," "allied medical disciplines," and "areas related to the practice of medicine"). Mean ratings replicated those reported by Kern et al. (r = 0.70 to 0.97, p less than 0.004). Using additional data about current practice patterns, ratings by general internists were compared with ratings by subspecialists. Both groups identified basic skill and knowledge areas as most important and felt that many areas related to practice management had been underemphasized. Most allied medical disciplines, however, were more important to generalists. Exposure to non-internal medicine areas seems important for residents considering subspecialization. However, all residents may benefit from increased emphasis on basic clinical skills and practice management. Program directors may want to address these issues, given the recent decline in applications to internal medicine programs.     

The internal medicine subinternship: a curriculum needs assessment

Despite broad acceptance of the internal medicine subinternship rotation by the undergraduate medical education community, only a small fraction of programs provide students with explicit learning objectives. To design a curriculum for the medical subinternship, we surveyed 3 different groups of educational stakeholders--subinternship directors, residency program directors, and housestaff--in order to identify and prioritize the competencies that should be learned during this rotation. This study provides a starting point for the development of a structured curriculum for the fourth-year subinternship rotation.     

The rheumatology knowledge and skills of trainees in internal medicine and family practice

Our study examines the rheumatology knowledge and skills of trainees in internal medicine and family practice residency programs. Site visits were made to 15 programs in the eastern half of the United States. Eighty-one trainees participated in the study, 53 in internal medicine and 28 in family practice. Each completed a 50-item rheumatology quiz and performed a clinical assessment of a trained patient evaluator. Trainees in internal medicine had quiz and clinical assessment scores of 52.4% and 72.9%, respectively, while scores for family practice trainees were 43.4% and 61.6% (p less than 0.004 for both). Regression analysis showed that having had a rheumatology elective had a significant effect on knowledge and skills. Trainees in family practice programs were 3 times less likely than internal medicine trainees to have taken a rheumatology elective. Family practice trainee scores in our study were comparable to scores previously documented in 4th year medical students. These results confirm the importance of a specific rheumatology experience for the development of rheumatology knowledge and skills in internal medicine and family practice trainees, and suggest that the rheumatology content of these training programs needs to be enhanced.     

Rheumatology training at internal medicine and family practice residency programs

The Medical Research Education Subcommittee of the American Rheumatism Association surveyed a random selection of large and small programs in internal medicine and family practice residency programs in order to evaluate their rheumatology training. Formal rheumatology training is offered in 90% of these residency programs, but many available positions are not being filled. A full-time staff rheumatologist was present at 69% of large internal medicine programs, 32% of small internal medicine programs, and 11% of family practice programs. The methods of rheumatology training are similar in most programs, although small internal medicine programs and family practice programs more often utilize physicians' offices or outside medical centers for the rheumatology elective training. A majority of the directors of these residency programs thought that many basic skills and techniques were not taught adequately and that the training of their rheumatology residents was not equal to that of residents in cardiology or gastroenterology.     

The future of general internal medicine

The Society of General Internal Medicine asked a task force to redefine the domain of general internal medicine. The task force believes that the chaos and dysfunction that characterize today's medical care, and the challenges facing general internal medicine, should spur innovation. These are our recommendations: while remaining true to its core values and competencies, general internal medicine should stay both broad and deep—ranging from uncomplicated primary care to continuous care of patients with multiple, complex, chronic diseases. Postgraduate and continuing education should develop mastery. Wherever they practice, general internists should be able to lead teams and be responsible for the care their teams give, embrace changes in information systems, and aim to provide most of the care their patients require. Current financing of physician services, especially fee-for-service, must be changed to recognize the value of services performed outside the traditional face-to-face visit and give practitioners incentives to improve quality and efficiency, and provide comprehensive, ongoing care. General internal medicine residency training should be reformed to provide both broad and deep medical knowledge, as well as mastery of informatics, management, and team leadership. General internal medicine residents should have options to tailor their final 1 to 2 years to fit their practice goals, often earning a certificate of added qualification (CAQ) in special generalist fields. Research will expand to include practice and operations management, developing more effective shared decision making and transparent medical records, and promoting the close personal connection that both doctors and patients want. We believe these changes constitute a paradigm shift that can benefit patients and the public and reenergize general internal medicine.     

A medicolegal curriculum for internal medicine residents

Many residents lack knowledge about medicolegal issues. To assess the ability of 64 primary care residents to learn legal medicine, we studied the impact of a medicolegal curriculum in a randomized, controlled study. We measured residents' medicolegal knowledge using a novel test, the Legal Medicine Evaluation (LME). We found that the mean LME score of residents exposed to the curriculum increased 15.5 points (on a 100-point scale) to 65.9 ( p <.01), while the mean LME score of control residents increased only 3.5 points, to 53.5 ( p =. 05). Clearly, residents can learn basic medicolegal principles. Thus, observed deficiencies in medicolegal knowledge most likely arise from inadequate medicolegal instruction.     

器官医学与内科的综合优势

大约两年前,笔者曾请教中华内科杂志主编王海燕教授有关内科学发展的问题并提出撰写“器官医学与内科的综合优势”的请求。因为工作忙碌,所以直至今日才动笔。     

Geriatrics training in general internal medicine fellowship programs: current practice, barriers, and strategies for improvement

To ensure its growth and prosperity, general internal medicine will need to embrace care of the elderly, research on aging, and geriatrics education as components of its core mission. Experts agree that general internal medicine fellows could benefit from increased opportunities in research on aging and geriatrics education; however, important barriers will hamper efforts to integrate geriatrics training into general internal medicine fellowship programs. This article reviews the barriers to integration and proposes solutions for overcoming those barriers. As a result of interviews and meetings with a broad representation of general internists, geriatricians, funding agencies, and policymakers, we propose 2 interventions: 1) the development of institutional program grants to foster collaboration between general internal medicine and geriatrics faculty in the training of general internal medicine fellows and 2) the creation of a 3-year fellowship program combining general internal medicine and geriatrics. This article discusses the importance of evaluating these and other programs intended to increase the geriatrics experience of general internal medicine fellows, and it describes the potential implications of these changes for a broad array of stakeholder institutions.     

Stroke management in a general internal medicine department: results of a survey regarding practice

PURPOSE: The incidence of strokes in the general population and the insufficient numbers of centers specialized in their management has led to the increased hospitalization of patients in general, internal medicine departments. The prognosis for patients is related to the relevance of the initial diagnostic and therapeutic measures. To optimize management of stroke patients outside of specialized units, a survey concerning practice was conducted in internal medicine departments in western France, and a meeting was held to define guidelines. METHODS: Data sheets were mailed to practitioners in internal medicine departments prior to the survey. The following data were recorded for each patient hospitalized during the two-week study: age, sex, clinical characteristics of stroke, risk factors, investigations performed, and initial and subsequent medical management. On the basis of the results, management guidelines were considered and defined. RESULTS: Patients hospitalized for a stroke in internal medicine departments have a similar profile to those hospitalized in neurology departments. CT-scan and EKG recordings were performed in most patients whereas other investigations (cervical ultrasound, echocardiography, MRI) were used less frequently. The use of rehabilitation and therapeutic strategies for secondary stroke prevention were not always performed according to current guidelines. CONCLUSION: Internal medicine departments are frequently involved in the care of stroke patients. The present study of clinical practice may help to improve stroke management in these non-specialized departments.     

Evaluation of a national curriculum reform effort for the medicine core clerkship

BACKGROUND: In 1995, the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) and the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine (CDIM) developed and disseminated a new model curriculum for the medicine core clerkship that was designed to enhance learning of generalist competencies and increase interest in general internal medicine. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dissemination and use of the resulting SGIM/CDIM Core Medicine Clerkship Curriculum Guide. DESIGN: Survey of internal medicine clerkship directors at the 125 medical schools in the United States. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The questionnaire elicited information about the use and usefulness of the Guide and each of its components, barriers to effective use of the Guide, and outcomes associated with use of the Guide. Responses were received from 95 clerkship directors, representing 88 (70%) of the 125 medical schools. Eighty-seven (92%) of the 95 respondents were familiar with the Guide, and 80 respondents had used it. The 4 components used most frequently were the basic generalist competencies (used by 83% of those familiar with the Guide), learning objectives for these competencies (used by 83%), learning objectives for training problems (used by 70%), and specific training problems (used by 67%); 74% to 85% of those using these components found them moderately or very useful. The most frequently identified barriers to use of the Guide were insufficient faculty time, insufficient number of ambulatory care preceptors and training sites, and need for more faculty development. About 30% or more of those familiar with the Guide reported that use of the Guide was associated with improved ability to meet clerkship accreditation criteria, improved performance of students on the clerkship exam, and increased clerkship time devoted to ambulatory care. CONCLUSION: This federally supported initiative that engaged the collaborative efforts of the SGIM and the CDIM was successful in facilitating significant changes in the medicine core clerkship across the United States. Presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine annual meeting, San Francisco, Calif, April 1999. This work was supported in part by Contract No. 240-930029 from the Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration.