Oral vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus pemetrexed plus cisplatin as first-line treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: cost minimization analysis in 12 European countries

Objective: A combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin is a standard treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer; oral vinorelbine is registered in 45 countries. Pemetrexed and cisplatin are recommended in front-line chemotherapy of non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC). The objective of this study was to conduct a cost minimization analysis from the perspective of the national health service (NHS) in each of 12 European countries, based on a randomized phase II study in NS-NSCLC (NAVoTRIAL01), with 100 oral vinorelbine plus cisplatin patients (arm A) and 51 pemetrexed plus cisplatin patients (arm B).

Research design and methods: Country-specific costs and DRG codes considered included those relating to anticancer drugs, administration settings (out-patient/in-patient/at home), serious adverse events (defined as involving hospitalization and considered due to anticancer drugs) and concomitant medications. Relevant costs were calculated based on country-specific reimbursement procedures and official tariffs.

Main outcome measures: Cost and savings per patient.

Results: Using the NHS perspective, savings per patient treated with oral vinorelbine ranged from €1317 (Denmark) to €35,001 (Germany). Expressed as percentages, savings per patient treated with oral vinorelbine compared with pemetrexed ranged between 5% (France) and 83% (Czech Republic). Pooled average costs for each treatment arm across the 12 countries resulted in cost savings for payers of €12,871, favoring oral vinorelbine plus cisplatin.

Conclusions: Given the reported efficacy with both regimens, this pan-European economic analysis provides compelling evidence supporting oral vinorelbine use over pemetrexed for the treatment of NS-NSCLC. Oral vinorelbine provides similar efficacy and an easily manageable safety profile at lower overall cost per patient treated, combined with an easier/more convenient mode of administration. Sensitivity analysis across varied scenarios demonstrated the robustness of the results. The principle weakness of our study was its reliance upon a single small scale study to provide efficacy data, since this is the only study conducted in this specific population of patients. Further large scale trials are needed to confirm these results.     

Impacto presupuestario de una combinación a dosis fija de efavirenz-emtricitabina-tenofovir para tratamiento de pacientes infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana tipo 1

ObjectiveEstimate the budgetary impact of using a set-dose combination of efavirenzemtricitabine-tenofovir for the Spanish health care system's treatment of patients infected with HIV-1, while evaluating repercussions for each autonomous community in 2008.MethodsWe developed a budgetary impact model with pharmacological costs for the different currently available treatment options, based on GeSida's recommended guidelines for treating HIV-positive patients. The model defines five possible scenarios in which various possibilities for substituting different drug cocktails with the efavirenz-emtricitabine-enofovir combination are contemplated.ResultsThe investment per patient on a national level amounts to €7,989 in the base scenario (without considering the availability of the efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir combination) and to €7,997, €8,424, €7,830, €8,375 and €8,527 for scenario 1 (substitution of recommended drugs with efavirenz, emtricitabine and tenofovir or efavirenz, lamivudine and tenofovir); scenario 2 (substitution of recommended drugs with efavirenz); scenario 3 (substitution of recommended drugs with tenofovir); scenario 4 (substitution of recommended drugs with tenoforvir or zidovudine) and scenario 5 (total substitution), respectively. Compared with the base scenario this means increments of 0.11 %, 5.45 %, —1.99 %, 4.83 % and 6.73 % for scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.ConclusionUse of a set combination of efavirenz, emtricitabine and tenofovir to treat adult patients with the HIV-1 virus would lead to slight surpluses or even budgetary savings by decreasing the number of daily doses, which could increase patients’ quality of life and help them stay on the treatment properly.     

Review of the cost of diabetes complications in Australia,Canada, France,Germany, Italy and Spain

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To provide a comprehensive source document on previously published cost data for diabetic complications in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Spain for use in a peer-reviewed, validated diabetes model.

Methods: A search for published cost of diabetes complications data was performed in peer-reviewed journals listed in PubMed and health economic conference proceedings from 1994 to March 2005. Where country specific data were not available, we referred to government websites and local cost experts. All costs were inflated to 2003 Euros (€). Major complication costs are presented.

Results: First year costs of non-fatal myocardial infarction varied between €19?277 in Spain and €12?292 in Australia. In subsequent years of treatment, this range was €1226 (France) to €203 (Australia). Angina costs were similar across all four countries: €1716 in Australia; €2218 in Canada; €2613 in France; €3342 in Germany; €2297 in Italy; and €2207 in Spain. Event costs of non-fatal stroke were higher in Canada (€23?173) than in other countries (Australia €13?443; France €11?754; Germany €19?399; Italy €6583; Spain €4638). Event costs of end-stage renal disease varied depending on the type of dialysis: in Australia (€17?188–27?552); Canada (€33?811–58?159); France (€24?608–56?487); Germany (€46?296–68?175); Italy (€43?075–56?717); and Spain (€28?370–32?706). Lower extremity amputation costs were: €18?547 (Australia); €17?130 (Canada); €31?998 (France); €22?096 (Germany); €10?177 (Italy); and €14?787 (Spain).

Conclusions: Overall, our search showed costs are well documented in Australia, Canada, France and Germany, but revealed a paucity of data for Spain and Italy. Spanish costs, collected by contacting local experts and from government reports, generally appeared to be lower for treating cardiovascular complications than in other countries. Italian costs reported in the literature were primarily hospitalization costs derived from diagnosis-related groups, and therefore likely to misrepresent the cost of specific complications. Additional research is required to document complication costs in Spain and Italy. Australian and German values were collected primarily by referring to diagnostic related group (DRG) tariffs and, as a result, there may be a need for future economic evaluations measuring the accuracy of the costs and resource utilization in the reported values. These cost data are essential to create models of diabetes that are able to accurately simulate the cumulative costs associated with the progression of the disease and its complications.     

Acute coronary syndromes in Europe: 1-year costs and outcomes

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aims to estimate costs (including medications prescribed, intervention rates and hospital utilization) and health outcomes of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) during the first year following diagnosis.

Research design and methods: Treatment pathways for ACS patients were developed and country-specific resource use was multiplied by unit costs. Countries examined were the United Kingdom (UK), France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Patients with unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction (ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation with/without Q-wave) were considered. The study models the incidence of ACS, 1-year mortality, investigations, revascularisation, pharmaceutical use and medical management. Economic outcomes were direct healthcare costs (in 2004 Euros), including total cost, cost per patient with ACS and cost per capita.

Results: The estimated number of deaths in the first year following ACS diagnosis ranged from around 22?500 in Spain to over 90?000 in Germany. The largest contributors to total costs are hospital stay and revascularisation procedures. Pharmaceuticals were estimated at 14–25% of ACS total cost. The total cost of ACS in the UK is estimated around €1.9 billion, compared with €1.3 billion in France, €3.3 billion in Germany, €3.1 billion in Italy and €1.0 billion in Spain. The cost per ACS patient ranges from €7009 (in the UK) to €12?086 (Italy).

Conclusions: Countries with higher expenditure on ACS patients tended to have lower case-fatality rates, and countries with the lowest incidence of ACS also had the lowest cost per capita. The costs of ACS constitute a large proportion of total healthcare expenditure of Western European economies.     

Modelling the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the United States

Background and objectives: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, debilitating disease affecting an estimated 1.5 million patients in the US. The condition is associated with a substantial health and economic burden. An economic model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib (a novel oral Janus kinase inhibitor) versus biologic therapies commonly prescribed in the US for the treatment of RA.

Methods: A cost–utility model was developed whereby sequences of treatments were evaluated. Response to treatment was modeled by HAQ change, and informed by a network meta-analysis. Mortality, resource use and quality of life were captured in the model using published regression analyses based on HAQ score. Treatment discontinuation was linked to response to treatment and to adverse events. Patients were modeled as having had an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR), or to a first biologic therapy (TNFi-IR).

Results: The tofacitinib strategy was associated with cost savings compared with alternative treatment sequences across all modeled scenarios (i.e. in both the MTX-IR and TNFi-IR scenarios), with lifetime cost savings per patient ranging from $65,205 to $93,959 (2015 costs). Cost savings arose due to improved functioning and the resulting savings in healthcare expenditure, and lower drug and administration costs. The tofacitinib strategies all resulted in an increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), with additional QALYs per patient ranging from 0.01 to 0.22.

Conclusions: Tofacitinib as a second-line therapy following methotrexate failure and as a third-line therapy following a biologic failure produces lower costs and improved quality of life compared with the current pathway of care.     

Comparison of costs of sublingual immunotherapy and drug treatment in grass-pollen induced allergy: results from the SIMAP database study

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This analysis is focused on the comparison of costs of allergic rhinitis (R) alone or with allergic asthma (R?+?A) in grass pollen allergy, for subjects treated with sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) and symptomatic drugs, versus standard care controls.

Methods: The SIMAP (Sublingual IMmunotherapy in Allergic Patients) study is a longitudinal observational database operated by a network of Allergy centers. Patients suffering from grass pollen allergy were included in this analysis and assigned to SLIT (plus drugs as needed) or to treatment with drugs alone. Outcome measures included use of medications, SLIT, visits and tests. Costs were assessed from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service; unit costs were obtained from published sources to produce an average cost/patient for the first year after enrolment.

Results: One hundred and two patients were analyzed. Demographics were comparable in the two groups. Overall per patient yearly cost of treatment was higher in SLIT patients, both in the whole sample (€311 vs. €180/patient), in the R (€288 vs. €116) and R?+?A (€362 vs. €230) subpopulations, with R?+?A patients generating more costs than R patients in both groups. Nevertheless considerable savings were obtained in the cost of symptomatic drugs (?22% for R; ?34% for R?+?A) in SLIT patients.

Conclusions: Other studies have shown that SLIT can reduce the use of drugs for asthma and rhinitis, but this is the first time this outcome has been demonstrated in a routine care population (in the medical practice environment of an observational study) within the first year of treatment.     

Clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients with atherothrombosis: CAPRIE-based calculation of cost-effectiveness for Germany

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To model the 2-year cost-effectiveness of secondary prevention with clopidogrel versus aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) (ASS) in German patients with myocardial infarction (MI), ischaemic stroke (IS) or diagnosed with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), based on CAPRIE trial data and from the perspective of German third party payers (TPP).

Methods: An existing Markov model was adapted to Germany by using German cost data. The model was extended by using different datasets for cardiovascular event survival times (Framingham vs. Saskatchewan health databases) and in two separate scenarios.

Results: The treatment with clopidogrel leads to a reduction of 13.19 vascular events per 1000 patients, of which 2.21 are vascular deaths. The overall incremental costs for the 2-year management of atherothrombotic patients with clopidogrel instead of ASS are calculated to be about €1 241 440 per 1000 patients. The number of life-years saved (LYS) has been calculated as the difference in the number of life-years lost due to vascular death or events with ASS versus clopidogrel: it is 86.35 LYS when analysis is based on Framingham data and 66.07 LYS with Saskatchewan-based survival data. The incremental costs per LYS are €14 380 and €18 790, respectively. Cost-effectiveness is sensitive to changes in survival data, discounting and daily costs of clopidogrel, but stable against substantial (± 25%) changes in all other cost data.

Conclusion: The findings for Germany are in line with published results for Belgium (€13 390 per LYS) and also with results for Italy (€17 500 per LYS), both based on Saskatchewan data, and with a French analysis based on Framingham data (€15 907 per LYS). Even if no officially accepted cost-effectiveness threshold exists for Germany at present, incremental cost-effectiveness results of less than €20 000 per LYS for the treatment with clopidogrel can be assumed to be acceptable for German third party payers.     

Cost-effectiveness in Italy of preventive treatment with ramipril in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events

ABSTRACT

Objectives: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted in Italy of preventive treatment with ramipril (an angiotensin converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor) compared to no treatment in patients at high risk of cardiovascular death. The analysis was based on data extracted from the HOPE trial.

Methods: The current life table method was used in order to model a lifetime time horizon for outcomes and costs. The cohorts used were 1000 subjects on ramipril, and 1000 subjects on placebo enrolled in the HOPE trial. Kaplan–Meier curves at 5 years of the clinical study were fitted using an exponential model over a lifetime horizon, the outcome variables being myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization and death. Total direct medical costs have been considered from a third-party payer's perspective – the Italian National Health Service. Resources involved in each event/activity were estimated using the modified Delphi technique with a panel of six clinicians. Types of resources reported included drug therapies, laboratory and imaging tests, physician visits, outpatient and inpatient rehabilitation, as well as medical and surgical hospital admissions. The incremental cost per life year gained was the main measure of the analysis.

Results: ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) decreases with the length of the treatment period. After the first year the ICER is €55?062 and subsequently decreases to about €12?770 at 5 years, €5945 at 10 years and €3726 at 20 years. The two ways sensitivity analysis showed that at 5 years ICERs range from a saving of €4059 to a cost of €22?929 (at 20 years they are €1814 and €4434), mainly depending on the cost of drug and cost of events. Previous analyses in other countries based on the HOPE study obtained ICER values which are comparable with our results, when taking into account the different cost structure of the health care systems.

Conclusions: On the basis of these results, the use of ramipril is likely to represent an efficient use of public health expenditure in the Italian healthcare system.     

Will insomnia treatments produce overall cost savings to commercial managed-care plans? A predictive analysis in the United States

ABSTRACT

Objective: Research indicates that insomnia may contribute significantly to healthcare costs; however, information on the effects of treatments on costs has not been thoroughly published. This study presents predictive models that forecast, from the perspective of commercial managed care, the effects of insomnia medications in reducing overall medical costs. The main objectives of this study were to predict the level of cost savings associated with insomnia treatments, illustrate the variation in outcomes given underlying model assumptions, and assist managed-care policy-makers with the evaluation of medications routinely administered for insomnia.

Methods: Data on four primary-efficacy measures: wake after sleep onset (WASO), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep onset latency (SOL) and total sleep time (TST) were abstracted from published clinical trial data for eszopiclone, indiplon, low-dose trazodone, ramelteon, zaleplon, zolpidem and zolpidem extended-release. Change in per-patient per-year (PPPY) healthcare costs in a single claims database was calculated for subjects taking zolpidem, zaleplon and low-dose trazodone using generalized linear model (GLM) techniques, controlling for baseline demographics and baseline costs. Change in costs for emerging insomnia medications was forecasted by imputing efficacy values for these drugs into the regressions.

Results: Using the accepted efficacy measure, WASO, zolpidem extended-release had the overall forecasted savings of –$1253 (CI: –$1404 to –$1404) PPPY compared to remaining treatments, whereas ramelteon cost an additional $348 (–$1280 to $584) PPPY. In three out of four cost-efficacy models, zolpidem extended-release had higher mean forecasted PPPY savings.

Conclusion: This study examined cost effects of existing and emerging insomnia medications using models integrating clinical literature and medical claims within a statistical framework. The use of a single database may limit generalizability and models only address a 1?year period. Results suggest treatments can offer health plans direct cost savings, with amounts sensitive to variable and efficacy measures, potentially limited by those variables available in the claims database. Compared to other evaluated treatments, zolpidem extended-release produced consistently higher predicted cost savings.     

Economic impact of gefitinib for refractory non-small-cell lung cancer: a Markov model-based analysis

ABSTRACT

Few data are available on the economics of target therapy for refractory non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Objective: To determine the mean global management costs (MC) per patient treated with gefitinib for NSCLC, and the costs of the different management phases.

Method: A Markov approach was used to model treatment costs in a cohort of 106 patients treated with gefitinib as part of a compassionate-use program (third-line treatment) in six public-sector teaching hospitals. The economic analysis adopted the healthcare payer's perspective, and only direct costs were taken into account.

Results: The mean duration of gefitinib treatment was 4.6 ± 5.8 months (1–29 months); median survival was 4 months, 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 12.3% and 4.7%, respectively. The mean total management cost was €39?979 ± 20?279. The model showed that first- and second-line treatments accounted for respectively 29.5% and 44.1% of this cost, while gefitinib periods represented 10.7%, periods of remission 1.25%, and terminal care 14.5%. A sensitivity analysis showed that the price of gefitinib had little influence on the total cost.

Conclusion: The cost of third-line gefitinib therapy for NSCLC appears acceptable from the healthcare payer's perspective, but this needs to be confirmed in dedicated cost–effectiveness studies.     

Switch strategies in the management of hypertension: a cost minimisation analysis of angiotensin receptor blocker based regimen

ABSTRACT

Background and objective: Budgetary pressures within health care systems have led many health care providers to consider the switching of patients on long term anti­hypertensive medication to agents with the lowest acquisition price. The long term success of this strategy hinges on price differentials remaining stable, an assumption that may not be valid in drug classes where patent expiry times vary. The treatment of hypertension using angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) represents just such a case. The present study, therefore, modelled the 5-year cost consequences of treatment based on losartan, candesartan, valsartan and irbesartan, based on expected patent expiry dates.

Methods: A Markov model was constructed, applying dose-specific blood-pressure lowering and costs to a cohort of uncontrolled mild–moderate hypertensive patients and assessing the anticipated cost of treatment over a 5 year period. A probabilistic approach was adopted to account for between-patient and between-treatment differences.

Results: For both undiscounted and discounted models, a losartan-based regimen represents the least costly option of the four agents tested. Median (IQR) discounted expenditure per patient for each agent was: losartan: £506 (£441–£650), candesartan: £610 (£542–£766), valsartan: £809 (£796–£1078), irbesartan £696 (£694–£934).

Conclusion: Switching hypertensive patients taking ARBs to the agent with the lowest current acquisition cost may yield only transient budgetary savings. Once patent expiry is taken into account, this model suggests that maintaining or switching patients to losartan would yield considerably greater savings over 5 years.     

Análisis de minimización de costes de fludarabina (Beneflur®) oral vs. vía intravenosa en España

IntroductionVarious international studies have shown that fludarabine is effective, safe, and efficient for treating B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL). The purpose of the present study was to carry out a cost-minimization analysis for two alternative forms of fludarabine (oral and intravenous) used to treat B-CLL in Spain.MethodsThe presence of clinical evidence about the treatment equivalence of the two options being compared (oral fludarabine vs. intravenous fludarabine) led us to carry out a cost-minimization analysis. A pharmacoeconomic model was constructed to compile data from the literature and experts’ opinions in order to determine the use of health resources associated with the treatment; unit costs were obtained from Spanish databases. The analysis contemplated two perspectives: that of the national health service, which includes only direct health costs, and the social perspective, which also includes the indirect costs that result from loss of productivity.ResultsAlthough fludarabine in its oral form has a higher purchase price than generic intravenous fludarabine does, increased administration costs for the latter, which is used in hospitals, mean that oral fludarabine use produces total savings of €1,908 and €1,292 for single-drug therapy and combined therapy with cyclophosphamide, respectively. Including indirect costs increased the savings associated with the oral form of the drug.ConclusionsIn B-CLL patients, treatment with oral fludarabine has a lower cost than treatment with intravenous fludarabine, in both single-drug therapy and combined therapy. Various sensitivity analyses confirmed these results and showed that oral fludarabine should be the treatment of choice for B-CLL in Spain, unless contraindicated.     

Telemedicine efficiently improves access to hepatitis C management to achieve HCV elimination in the penitentiary setting

IntroductionLinkage to care for hepatitis C includes a new tool: teleconsultation. Micro-elimination in prison is a recommendation and is feasible. An economic evaluation of telemedicine for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in prisons has not yet been performed. This study aimed to provide a cost-minimization analysis comparing two strategies of HCV treatment in a prison: telemedicine clinical practice (TCP) and the usual clinical practice (UCP).MethodsAn observational cost-minimization study was carried out on a cohort of inmates who received anti-HCV treatment in El Dueso prison (May 2016–November 2017). A decision tree was constructed, incorporating different clinical profiles according to the severity of the disease, the results of diagnostic tests, and treatment outcomes as well as the costs of each profile. Satisfaction with telemedicine was evaluated through an 11-question questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale.ResultsSeventy-five inmates were treated and underwent TCP with a follow-up of one year. The average cost per patient with the TCP strategy was €1,172 (€1,151 direct costs). Had UCP been carried out, the cost would have been €1,687 (€1,630 direct). Telemedicine consultation practice produced savings of €516 (30.6%) per patient, with total savings of €38,677. The transfer costs from prison to hospital represented the most important saving item, accounting for 99.3% of the TCP-related savings. The questionnaire revealed high levels of satisfaction with TCP, with a median score of 5 in each question. Sustained virological response rates were 94.7% after the first treatment and 100% after retreatment of the four relapses.ConclusionTelemedicine consultation practice is a more efficient strategy than UCP, mainly due to the reduction of transfer costs while preserving effectiveness and user satisfaction.     

Economic evaluation of tiotropium and salmeterol in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Greece

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of two therapeutic alternatives for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the Greek National Health Service (NHS) setting.

Methods: A Markov probabilistic model was used to compare tiotropium with salmeterol. A Monte Carlo simulation with 5000 cases was run in the probabilistic analysis. The model was designed to compute the expected time spent in each state, the expected number of exacerbations occurring and the expected treatment cost per patient. Probabilities were extracted from clinical trials, resource utilisation and cost data from a Greek university hospital.

Results: Quality adjusted life years were 0.70 (95% Uncertainty Interval [UI]: 0.63 to 0.77) in the tiotropium arm and 0.68 (95% UI: 0.60 to 0.75) in the salmeterol arm; a difference of 0.02 (95% UI: –0.08 to 0.13). Exacerbations reached 0.85 (95% UI: 0.80 to 0.91) in the tiotropium arm and 1.02 (95% UI: 0.84 to 1.21) in the salmeterol arm, a difference of –0.17 (95% UI: –0.37 to 0.02). Estimates of the mean annual cost per patient were €2504 (€2122 to €2965) in the tiotropium arm and €2655 (€2111 to €3324) in the salmeterol arm, a difference of –€151 (–€926 to €580). Stochastic analysis showed that tiotropium may have an advantage in reducing exacerbations. The probability that tiotropium is cost-effective was 65% at a ceiling value of €0 and reached 77% at a ceiling ratio of €1000. Results stay fairly constant in various sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion: Even though tiotropium is more expensive to buy than salmeterol in the Greek NHS (using Greek costs there was no statistically significant difference in total costs between tiotropium and salmeterol), overall, during the course of a year, it is actually associated with a lower prevalence of exacerbations and lower treatment costs and thus may represent a viable and cost-effective alternative in the Greek NHS setting.     

XELOX versus FOLFOX6 as an adjuvant treatment in colorectal cancer: an economic analysis

ABSTRACT

Objectives: An economic analysis (based on interim data from a long-term, randomised, multi-centre, controlled, clinical trial) to evaluate chemotherapy with XELOX (capecitabine/oxaliplatin) versus FOLFOX6 (5Fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin) as an adjuvant treatment for high risk colorectal cancer patients in Greece.

Methods: As survival rate was the same in the two arms, a cost-minimisation analysis was carried out, from the perspectives of the National Health Service (NHS), Social Insurance Funds (SIF) and patients in Greece. Patient data were combined with 2008 unit prices to estimate the total cost of patient care, the patients’ travelling expenditure and their productivity losses. Raw data were bootstrapped 5000 times in order to allow statistical testing.

Results: From an NHS perspective, the mean chemotherapy cost was €8762 with FOLFOX6 and €9713 with XELOX; costs of administration and hospitalisations were €5154 and €1050, respectively. Total treatment cost with FOLFOX6 reached €17?480 and with XELOX €12?525, a difference of €4955 (p?<?0.001) in favour of the latter therapy. From an SIF perspective, the total cost of treatment was €16?240 with FOLFOX6 and €12?617 with XELOX, a reduction of €3623 (p?<?0.001) with the latter therapy. Mean patient travelling cost was €184 with FOLFOX6 and €80 with XELOX, a difference of €104 (p?<?0.001). Mean productivity loss was €100 with FOLFOX6 and €31 with XELOX, a difference of €69 (p?<?0.001).

Conclusions: Chemotherapy combining oral capecitabine and oxaliplatin reduces total treatment cost for the Greek National Health Service and Social Insurance Funds, mainly through a reduction in the cost of administration. From patients’ perspective, it reduces travelling expenditure and productivity losses. Therefore, this combination may be a cost-effective approach for the management of colorectal cancer patients who have had surgery in Greece. This is an analysis alongside a clinical trial, and should be interpreted in this specific context in which it was undertaken.     

Budget impact of including ribociclib in combination with letrozole on US payer formulary: first-line treatment of post-menopausal women with HR+/HER2− advanced or metastatic breast cancer

Objectives: The combination of a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitor with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole is a safe and effective alternative to letrozole monotherapy for first-line hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2?) breast cancer. This study evaluates the budget impact of using the CDK 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib plus letrozole as a first-line treatment option for postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2? advanced breast cancer, from a United States (US) payer perspective.

Methods: A cohort-based budget impact model was used to calculate the incremental cost of introducing ribociclib plus letrozole over three years for the target population. The analysis compared two scenarios: treatment options excluding or including ribociclib plus letrozole. Market shares were derived from market research and the assumption was the introduction of ribociclib plus letrozole would only displace existing CDK-based therapies. Treatment duration was based on the median time to treatment discontinuation or median progression-free survival for first-line treatment, and on clinical trial data for second- and third-line treatment. Acquisition costs were based on wholesale acquisition costs and considered co-payment. Costs for drug administration and monitoring, subsequent therapy, and relevant adverse events were included.

Results: Of 1 million insured members, 263 were eligible for CDK 4/6 inhibitor treatment. Cumulative total savings with ribociclib plus letrozole were $3.01M over three years, corresponding to a cumulative incremental cost saving of $318.11 per member treated per month.

Conclusions: In the US, ribociclib plus letrozole represents a cost-saving first-line treatment option for postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2? advanced breast cancer.     

Economic implications of using pegfilgrastim rather than conventional G-CSF to prevent neutropenia during small-cell lung cancer chemotherapy

ABSTRACT

Background: For the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile aplasia, a single injection of pegfilgrastim per cycle has the same efficacy as six to ten injections of conventional granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). However, there are few data on the economic impact of pegfilgrastim use, especially in the context of small-cell lung cancer.

Methods: This retrospective study involved 31 patients and 129 treatment cycles (32 with pegfilgrastim and 97 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)). We estimated the direct costs for preventing and managing febrile aplasia from the payer's perspective and also conducted a willingness-to-pay study with 100 healthy subjects, in order to estimate how highly a single-jab strategy was valued relative to multiple injections.

Results: The costs per cycle were respectively €1743?±?837 and €1466?±?836 for the pegfilgrastim and G-CSF strategies (p?<?0.001). The excess cost of the pegfilgrastim strategy was partly compensated for by the perceived value of the single-jab strategy: 88% of interviewees would prefer the pegfilgrastim strategy; 16% would be willing to pay all the excess cost (€277) and 67% would be willing to pay half the excess cost.

Conclusion: In this willingness-to-pay survey, the excess cost associated with pegfilgrastim relative to other G-CSF-based prophylactic strategies is partly offset by the perceived convenience of a single injection.     

Emerging PARP inhibitors for treating breast cancer

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Some breast cancers harbor defects in DNA repair pathways, including BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, leading to a genomic instability. Compromised DNA-damage repair response is found in 11 to 42% of triple negative breast cancers, with a frequency varying according to family history and ethnicity. The oral PARP inhibitors are a promising strategy in breast cancer exploiting Homologous Deficient Recombination deficiency (HRD) by a synthetic lethal approach. Several PARP inhibitors have currently reached early phase trials with studies on going in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant and metastatic setting.

Area covered: Here, we review completed and ongoing trials with PARP inhibitors as well as their mechanisms of activity and acquired resistance.

Expert opinion: PARP inhibitors show promising results in breast cancer. However, several issues are raised including the identification of biomarkers to predict treatment response and strategies to counteract emerging resistance.     

Cost-effectiveness of mass screening for Hepatitis C virus among all inmates in an Irish prison

BackgroundIn Irish prisons, there is a high proportion of people who inject drugs (PWID; 26%) and a high prevalence of HCV (16%), making prison a high priority setting for HCV testing and treatment. We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a mass HCV screening intervention in Mountjoy Prison, Dublin, compared to the standard-of-care of intermittent screening on committal.MethodsPrimary cost data was collected from the intervention using an overall provider perspective. Standard-of-care (SOC) costs were estimated through interview. All costs were inflated to 2020 Euros. An HCV transmission and disease progression model among incarcerated and community PWID and ex-injectors was calibrated to the Dublin HCV epidemic, allowing inclusion of population-level health benefits. The model used intervention data, suggesting 419 individuals were screened, 50 HCV infections diagnosed and 32 individuals initiated treatment, to project the resulting costs and health benefits (quality adjusted life years or QALYs) over 50 years with 5% discounting. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER), cost per QALY gained, was estimated for the screening intervention compared to the standard-of-care. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) determined the probability that the intervention was cost-effective compared to a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000/QALY as used in Ireland. The ICER for 1- or 3-yearly mass screening in all Dublin prisons was also calculated.ResultsThe total direct costs of the intervention (not including treatment drug costs) was €82,392, with most costs being due to staff (43%) and overhead or management costs (38%). Despite having little epidemiological impact due to the small numbers treated, over 50 years the incremental cost of the intervention was €36,592 and 3.8 QALYs were gained, giving a mean ICER of €9,552/QALY. The majority (84%) of PSA runs were below the willingness-to-pay threshold. Yearly mass screening had an ICER of €2,729/QALY compared to SOC and gave a higher net monetary benefit (€7,393,382) than screening every 3 years (€6,252,816).ConclusionPrison mass screening could be a cost-effective initiative for increasing testing and treatment of HCV in Ireland.