Colectomy rate in acute severe ulcerative colitis in the infliximab era

BACKGROUND: Severe ulcerative colitis is a potentially life-threatening condition. Due to advances in medical therapy, the mortality rate has dropped to <2% over the past 30 years, but the colectomy rate reaches 30%. Recently, infliximab has been shown to be effective as rescue therapy but little is known about long-term benefits. AIM: To evaluate short-and long-term colectomy rates for severe ulcerative colitis in the era of biological treatment and to identify predictive factors of long-term colectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2001 to 2006 all in-patients with severe ulcerative colitis, according to Truelove and Witts criteria, were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had received intravenous steroid treatment; infliximab (5 mg/kg at 0, 2 and 6 weeks) was used as rescue therapy in steroid-refractory patients; colectomy was performed in patients who deteriorated whilst on steroid treatment or failed to respond to infliximab. RESULTS: Of the 314 ulcerative colitis patients hospitalized during the study period, 52 (16.5%) met the criteria of severe ulcerative colitis. After median 7 days (range 4-15) on intravenous steroids, 37/52 (71%) patients showed a clinical response, while 15/52 (29%) were steroid-refractory. Of these, four underwent urgent colectomy and 11 received infliximab. A clinical response was observed in all infliximab-treated patients. In the long-term, another six patients underwent elective colectomy. The overall colectomy rate, following the acute attack, was 19%; the cumulative probability of a course without colectomy was 90%, 86%, 84%, 81%, after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, respectively. No deaths occurred. The long-term colectomy risk was comparable in patients treated with infliximab and in steroid-responsive patients (18% vs. 11% respectively; OR 1.9; 95% CI 0.26-14.5). No predictive factors of colectomy, in the long-term, were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery continues to play an important role in acute severe ulcerative colitis. Infliximab can avoid urgent colectomy in steroid-refractory patients but the risk of elective colectomy, in the long-term, is not modified.     

Acute severe attacks of ulcerative colitis in a population-based cohort: epidemiology,treatment and outcome

Abstract

Background: Although the criteria for acute severe ulcerative colitis have been stable for decades, the epidemiology for this condition has rarely been described in a population-based setting.

Aim: To describe the appearance, treatment and outcome of acute severe ulcerative colitis in a population-based cohort of ulcerative colitis diagnosed between 2005 and 2009.

Methods: Between 2005 and 2009, all patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis in the County of Uppsala, a geographical area consisting of an average 318,000 individuals, were included in a cohort that was followed until the end of 2019. Three hundred and thirty patients covering an age interval of 3–86 years, were included. The medical records of the patients were scrutinized with regard to clinical course, drugs prescribed for IBD, hospitalization and surgical interventions. Patients that had left the health care area were contacted through letters except in case of emigration outside the country.

Results: Forty-nine patients experienced a first severe attack (14.8%), and six of these were operated (12.2%). Fifteen patients suffered a second or third attack, and one more was operated. One elderly lady died postoperatively from sepsis.

Conclusions: Acute severe attacks of ulcerative colitis appeared early after diagnosis and if surgery was escaped, there was no increased need for surgery in case of a new severe attack later.     

Predicting outcomes in acute severe ulcerative colitis

Response to corticosteroid treatment in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) has changed very little in the past 50 years. Predicting those at risk at an early stage helps stratify patients into those who may require second line therapy or early surgical treatment. Traditionally, risk scores have used a combination of clinical, radiological and biochemical parameters; established indices include the ‘Travis’ and ‘Ho’ scores. Recently, inflammatory bowel disease genetic risk alleles have been built into models to predict outcome in ASUC. Given the multifactorial nature of inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis, in the future, composite scores integrating clinical, biochemical, serological, genetic and other ‘-omic’ data will be increasingly investigated. Although these new genetic prediction models are promising, they have yet to supplant traditional scores, which remain the best practice. In this modern era of rescue therapies in ASUC, robust scoring systems to predict failure of ciclosporine and infliximab must be devised.     

Management of acute severe ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic relapsing and remitting inflammatory disorder that can generally be managed successfully with maintenance oral medications. However, approximately 15% of patients with ulcerative colitis will develop a severe exacerbation and require hospitalization. While many patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis will respond to a short course of intravenous corticosteroids, up to a third will fail to improve. In these patients with steroid-refractory colitis, the choice is between rescue medical therapy with ciclosporin or infliximab, or surgery. Well-timed rescue medical therapy is generally safe when administered by experienced physicians, and is effective in the majority of cases. Surgery is unavoidable in some cases, but is the treatment of choice in others. While ileal pouch–anal anastomosis offers the prospect of life without a permanent ileostomy, there are issues with its long-term functional outcome.     

Fecal calprotectin as an alternative to ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity to predict the response to corticosteroids of acute severe ulcerative colitis: A prospective observational study

BackgroundFecal calprotectin (FC) might be an alternative to ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS) to predict the response to corticosteroids (CS) in acute severe colitis (ASC).MethodsOne hundred and seventeen ASC patients were prospectively enrolled. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and sigmoidoscopic data were documented. Multivariate and ROC analyses were performed to identify risk factors for non-response to CS, and the predictive accuracy of possible predictors was assessed.ResultsTotally, 39 (33.33%) patients failed intravenous CS therapy. CS responders among mild (UCEIS 3–4), moderate (UCEIS 5–6) and severe (UCEIS 7–8) groups were 40/44 (90.91%) vs. 36/55 (65.45%) vs. 2/18 (11.11%) (p < 0.001). UCEIS (OR = 5.08; 95% CI, 1.93–8.66; p < 0.001) and FC (OR = 2.56; 95% CI, 1.17–3.55; p = 0.022) were found to be independent risk factors for CS non-responders. Compared with C-reactive protein, platelet, hemoglobin and albumin, baseline FC had the strongest correlation with UCEIS (r = 0.701, p < 0.001). ROC analysis of UCEIS and baseline FC in predicting CS non-response showed an AUC of 0.85 and 0.76 respectively.ConclusionsBaseline FC levels correlated significantly with UCEIS in ASC, and both were useful in predicting short-term outcome of CS treatment. Baseline FC levels could be used as an alternative of UCEIS to guide the decision of early salvage therapy or colectomy and reduce the adverse effects of long-term futile CS usage.     

Management of acute, severe ulcerative colitis

When a patient is hospitalized with acute, severe ulcerative colitis, the primary decision is whether or not to proceed directly to surgery. Absolute indications for an immediate colectomy include exsanguinating hemorrhage, perforation and cancer. If medical therapy is undertaken, however, the decision for urgent surgery or non-operative salvage therapy will still be required in 15-50% of the patients in which there is a failure to respond within 3-5 days to a standard regimen of i.v. steroids, antibiotics, decompressive maneuvers, fluid and electrolyte replacement and other supportive measures. The options for medical salvage therapy are usually cyclosporine or infliximab. There are theoretical and practical arguments on each side; the current GETAID and CONSTRUCT trials will probably provide support for either. The choice between colectomy or medical salvage therapy, however, must not be delayed under any circumstances. Before choosing salvage therapy, one must first be certain that there is the luxury of time, that there is a post-hospital strategy for the maintenance of remission and that the colon is worth saving. The priority is not so much saving colons as it is saving lives.     

溃疡性结肠炎的分期治疗

溃疡性结肠炎(ulcerative colitis,UC)是临床上常见的消化系统疑难病,治愈率低,易复发。研究证实,UC患者患结直肠癌、强迫症、恐慌症、抑郁症和焦虑症的概率较高,给生活带来了较大的困扰[1-2]。以往该病在北美和欧洲多见,近年来,我国UC的发病率呈上升趋势[3],但目前为止其确切的发病原因及机制尚不明确,因此治疗上只能控制急性发作,减缓疾病进程,减少并发症,使患者长期维持在缓解期,以提高生活质量,避免再次住院[4]。     

The beneficial effect of azathioprine on maintenance of remission in severe ulcerative colitis

Background. The search is on to find more effective drug regimens for patients with severe ulcerative colitis, as conventional drugs such as sulfasalazine and its congeners fail to prevent relapse in a significant number of patients. Azathioprine has also been reported to be useful as a steroid-sparing drug in patients who suffer from frequent relapses. As these drugs when used individually fail to sustain remission in a significant number of patients, we evaluated the combination of these two drugs. Methods. Thirty-five newly diagnosed patients with severe ulcerative colitis were randomized into two groups; group A (combination therapy) received sulfasalazine and azathioprine, while group B (sulfasalazine monotherapy) received sulfasalazine and placebo. In addition, all the patients received steroids initially to achieve clinical remission. The patients were followed-up for a period of 1 year. The therapeutic outcome was measured by the number of patients who suffered relapse in each group. Results. All the patients completed the 1-year study period. While 4 patients (23.5%) in group A suffered relapse of disease, 10 (55.6%) in group B suffered relapse, the difference being statistically significant. The relapse-free period was also significantly longer in group A. Conclusions. Combination therapy (sulfasalazine and azathioprine) is more effective than sulfasalazine and placebo in the maintenance of remission in patients with severe ulcerative colitis. Received: November 20, 2000 / Accepted: September 14, 2001     

Steroid-refractory severe ulcerative colitis responding to cyclosporine and long-term follow-up

We report a case of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis, treated with cyclosporine, in a 38-year-old woman with a 13-year history of ulcerative colitis. No remission was achieved with treatments that included intravenous hyperalimentation, sulfasalazine, and intensive parenteral prednisolone therapy for 4 weeks. Intravenous infusion of cyclosporine was performed because the patient refused to undergo surgery. Her condition improved dramatically and colectomy was avoided. She has been maintained on oral cyclosporine and azathioprine since steroids were discontinued, and she has remained in clinical and endoscopic remission for 2 years. The side effects were not significant, but mild paresthesia in both hands and mild hypertension, which was controlled by anti-hypertensives. Cyclosporine seems to be an effective treatment for patients with steroid-refractory severe active ulcerative colitis in whom colectomy seems inevitable. We believe further clinical trials of the treatment are warranted. (Received July 25, 1997; accepted Nov. 28, 1997)     

Surgical and medical treatment in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the mucosa of the colorectum. The treatment of UC depends on the severity of symptoms and the extent of the disease. Acute severe colitis (ASC) occurs in 12–25% of patients with UC. Patients with ASC must be managed by a multidisciplinary team. Medically or surgically aggressive treatment is carried out with the final aim of reducing mortality. Intravenous administration of corticosteroids is the mainstay of the therapy. Medical rescue therapy based on cyclosporine or infliximab should be considered if there is no response to corticosteroids for 3 days. If there has been no response to medical rescue therapy after 4–7 days, the patient must undergo colectomy in emergency surgery. Prolonged observation is counterproductive, as over time it increases the risk of toxic megacolon and perforation, with a very high mortality rate. The best potential treatment is subtotal colectomy with ileostomy and preservation of the rectum. Emergency surgery in UC should not be seen as a last chance, but can be considered as a life‐saving procedure. Colectomies in emergency setting are characterized by high morbidity rates but the mortality is low.     

Prognosis of severe attacks in ulcerative colitis: effect of intensive medical treatment

BACKGROUND: Severe attacks of ulcerative colitis have a high risk of colectomy. AIMS: To evaluate the effects of standard medical management and to identify the clinical and laboratory variables capable of predicting the clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective study monitoring the clinical and laboratory variables in 67 patients with severe colitis. Therapy consisted of prednisone, cyclosporin if no response, and azathioprine for maintenance. End-points were colectomy or remission. Logistic regression analysis was applied for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: Fourteen (20%) patients required colectomy, 34 (50%) patients achieved remission with steroids, 25 (37%) patients received cyclosporin, 19 (76%) with benefit. Increased body temperature, pulse rate, sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels on admission were significantly associated with colectomy. Sedimentation rate greater than 75 mm/h and body temperature exceeding 38 degrees C at admission had 4.6- and 8.8-fold increased risk of colectomy. Less than 40% reduction in the bowel movements within 5 days predicted no response to steroids. Azathioprine maintained remission in 70% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated sedimentation rate and fever at day 1 best predict colectomy in severe colitis. Less than 40% reduction in the bowel movements at day 5 predicts no response to steroids. Cyclosporin has a high rate of success in acute attacks and azathioprine in maintaining remission.     

Therapeutic options in acute severe ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis is a relapsing–remitting inflammatory disease affecting the colon and is associated with considerable morbidity. In acute severe attacks, there continues to be an associated mortality rate of 1–2%, even in specialist units. During an acute severe exacerbation, approximately two-thirds of patients will respond to intravenous corticosteroid therapy, the accepted first-line therapy in such cases. For steroid-refractory patients, options are limited to surgery (colectomy) or second-line agents, such as ciclosporin or infliximab, used in an attempt to salvage the colon. Considerable debate exists over the optimal management of such patients. During the last decade, an increased understanding of the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease has led to the rapid development of other biological agents, such as basiliximab and visilizumab. Novel methods, such as leucopheresis, have been studied and other established immunomodulatory agents, such as tacrolimus, have also been suggested. The purpose of this review is to highlight some of the areas of recent development in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis and review important safety data, with a particular emphasis on biological agents.     

Long-term maintenance treatment in ulcerative colitis: a 10-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: With the extensive use of mesalamine, the natural history of ulcerative colitis is probably changed. AIM: To evaluate the relapse rate and the duration of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis on maintenance treatment with mesalamine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enrolled in the study were 95 patients divided into 4 groups according to macroscopic location of the disease and treated with the same therapy starting from the date of enrolment. Patients in all 4 groups were followed-up until relapse occurred. The disease activity was evaluated by the Clinical Activity Index and Endoscopic Index. Patients suitable for recruitment showed a Clinical Activity Index and Endoscopic Index lower than 6 and 4, respectively. The patients with ulcerative pancolitis or left-sided colitis were treated with 1.6 g/day while the cases with proctosigmoiditis or proctitis were treated with 5-acetylsalicylic acid enemas 4 g/day Each patient was evaluated with clinical and endoscopic assessment at a 6-month interval. Relapse was defined as an increase in Clinical Activity Index and Endoscopic Index, of more than 6 and 4, respectively. RESULTS: Five patients dropped-out. All enrolled patients showed a clinical and/or endoscopic relapse within 10 years, the majority 2 or 3 years after diagnosis: pancolitis and left-sided colitis within 2-3 years and patients with distal colitis within 9-10 years. CONCLUSIONS: A relapse was observed in most cases within 3 years, and in all recruited patients within a space of ten years. The extent of the disease in the colon is an important prognostic factor, as patients with distal colitis showed a lesser tendency to relapse.     

Right-sided ulcerative colitis

This report describes a case of right-sided ulcerative colitis in which multiple shallow ulcers and erosion with symmetric luminal stenosis were distributed segmentally from the ascending colon to the cecum, with a skip lesion composed of superficial erosions in the right half of the transverse colon. Both the rectum and the left colon were spared at the time of onset. Biopsies taken from the lesions showed non-specific inflammation, while those from the rectum and sigmoid colon showed no abnormal findings. A 5-year follow-up study was made based on radiography and endoscopy. Other inflammatory bowel diseases, such as Crohn's disease, tuberculosis, Yersinosis, Behçet's disease, and ischemic colitis were all ruled out, based on the macroscopic and microscopic findings as well as the clinical course. To our knowledge, this is the first report of right-sided ulcerative colitis that has been followed for a long period.     

Infliximab or cyclosporine for acute severe ulcerative colitis: a retrospective analysis

Background and Aim: Medical treatment of steroid‐refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) is limited to either cyclosporine or infliximab. Studies comparing cyclosporine with either placebo or intravenous methylprednisone showed promise for cyclosporine, but associated it with significant toxicity. There is conflicting, but increasingly positive evidence for using infliximab. There are no studies directly comparing these two treatments. Our aim was to compare the outcomes of patients with steroid‐refractory UC treated with either intravenous cyclosporine or infliximab. Methods: We carried out a retrospective review of inpatients with steroid‐refractory UC, treated with either intravenous cyclosporine or infliximab, at Waitemata District Health Board, between January 2001 and February 2010. The primary end‐points were time to colectomy, and colectomy rates at 3 and 12 months. Secondary end‐points were time to discharge from initiation of treatment, steroid dependence at 12 months, and reported adverse events. Results: The total study population was 38, with 19 in the infliximab group. Follow up to 12 months was complete in all patients. At 3 months, the colectomy rate was 63% for cyclosporine, compared to 21% (P = 0.0094). By 12 months the rate was 68% and 37% for cyclosporine and infliximab, respectively (P = 0.06). Patients in the cyclosporine group required an additional 5 days in hospital (P = 0.0086). Steroid dependence at 12 months was 50% for cyclosporine versus 25% for infliximab (P = 0.36). Cyclosporine caused more adverse events (P = 0.17). Conclusions: Infliximab improved clinical outcomes compared to the previous use of intravenous cyclosporine in patients admitted with steroid‐refractory acute severe UC.     

Colonic substance P levels are increased in ulcerative colitis and decreased in chronic severe constipation

Substance P content was determined by radioimmunoassay in colonic mucosa from 24 patients with chronic severe constipation, 16 with active ulcerative colitis, and 28 normal controls. In patients with chronic severe constipation, the mean concentration of substance P (19.9±8.2 pg/mg) was significantly lower than in normal subjects (71±18 pg/mg). In patients with ulcerative colitis, colonic substance P concentration in inflamed mucosa (170±46 pg/mg) was significantly higher than its levels in normal subjects. Substance P may therefore have a role in the pathogenesis of clinical conditions associated with diarrhea and constipation.     

Cytomegalovirus infection in ulcerative colitis

Objective. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection has been reported as an exacerbating factor in inflammatory bowel disease but the relationship between CMV infection and ulcerative colitis (UC) remains unclear. There has been no detailed research to elucidate the clinicopathologic features of CMV infection in UC using surgical specimens. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic features of CMV infection in UC patients who had undergone colectomy.

Material and methods. Surgical specimens taken from UC patients were examined for CMV infection. The patients were divided into three groups: severe, refractory, and UC-associated dysplasia or cancer according to the operative indications. CMV infection rates were evaluated and a comparison of clinical parameters was made between CMV-positive and CMV-negative patients, and the risk factors for CMV infection were analyzed using multivariate analyses.

Results. It was found that 25% of 32 patients were positive for CMV in the severe UC group; 8.3% of 72 patients were positive for CMV in the refractory UC group. None of the 22 patients was positive for CMV in the UC-associated dysplasia or cancer group. The CMV-positive rate in the severe UC group was significantly higher than that in the other groups (p<0.05). Patients’ age at the time of operation was higher in the CMV-positive group than in the CMV-negative group among the patients with severe UC (p<0.01), and age at operation was an independent risk factor for CMV infection.

Conclusions. CMV is found more frequently in severe UC than refractory UC and UC-associated cancer or dysplasia. Higher age can be a risk factor for CMV infection in patients with severe UC. However, a high steroid dose may not always be a risk factor for CMV infection.     

Bacterial invasion into the colonic mucosa in ulcerative colitis

Abstract This study investigated interactions between mucosal lesions and bacterial invasion in ulcerative colitis using the acridine-orange staining method. In all 16 cases of ulcerative colitis, the mucosa was found to be invaded by small rods and cocci. In five of 10 controls, bacteria were seen only adhering to the mucosa and no bacteria were detected in the five remaining cases. It is suggested that the presence of bacteria in the colonic mucosa may be a factor responsible for the persistence or aggravation of ulcerative colitis.