An algorithm using the early changes in PINP to predict the future BMD response for patients treated with daily teriparatide

Summary

About two thirds of patients with a procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) increase of >80 μg/l at 1 month after starting teriparatide therapy showed a ≥10 % increase in lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline at 12 months. We recommend this algorithm as an aid in the clinical management of patients treated with daily teriparatide.

Introduction

An algorithm using PINP is provided in osteoporotic patients with teriparatide treatment. The correlations between the early changes in PINP and the subsequent BMD changes after daily teriparatide therapy were studied to develop an algorithm to monitor patients.

Methods

We evaluated whether early changes in PINP correlated with the changes in BMD at 12 months and developed an algorithm using the early changes in PINP to predict the upcoming BMD increases.

Results

The highest correlation coefficient for the relationship between PINP and LS BMD response was determined for the absolute change in PINP at 1 month and the percent change in LS BMD at 12 months (r?=?0.36, p <0.01). Using a receiver operator curve analysis, we determined that an 80 μg/l increase in PINP was the most convenient predictor of a 10 % increase in LS BMD from baseline (area under curve?=?0.72). Using a cut-off value of 80 μg/l, the positive predictive value for predicting a 10 % increase in LS BMD from baseline to 12 months was 65 %.

Conclusion

Greater short-term changes in PINP with teriparatide therapy are associated with greater 12-month increases in LS BMD. About two thirds of patients with a PINP increase of >80 μg/l at 1 month after starting treatment showed a ≥10 % increase in LS BMD from baseline at 12 months. We recommend this algorithm as an aid in the clinical management of patients treated with teriparatide.     

Response rate of bone mineral density to teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

PURPOSE: It is desirable for clinicians to know what bone mineral density (BMD) response they can expect in women treated with osteoporosis therapies. The focus of this analysis was to determine what percentage of women attained a lumbar spine BMD response to teriparatide that equaled or exceeded the least significant change (LSC) value of 3%. METHODS: Data from three clinical trials involving postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were examined. The Fracture Prevention Trial was a double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial examining the safety and efficacy of teriparatide 20 and 40 microg/day. The other two trials were double-blinded, head-to-head comparisons of alendronate 10 mg/day and teriparatide 20 or 40 microg/day, respectively. Only treatment-compliant women who had lumbar spine BMD measurements at all specified time points in these trials were included. For reference, we also examined the percentage of women with lumbar spine BMD responses to alendronate. Hip BMD responses that equaled or exceeded 3% were also examined. RESULTS: According to the LSC criteria, 91% of the teriparatide 20 microg/day group and 94% of the teriparatide 40 microg/day group were lumbar spine BMD responders at 18 months in the Fracture Prevention Trial. In the teriparatide 20 microg/alendronate head-to-head trial, 94% of women receiving teriparatide had a lumbar spine BMD response that equaled or exceeded the 3% criterion at 18 months compared to 75% of those receiving alendronate 10 mg/day (p < 0.01). In the teriparatide 40 microg/day group of the other head-to-head trial, 92% of women achieved the 3% criterion for the lumbar spine at 12 months compared to 69% of those receiving alendronate 10 mg/day (p < 0.01). The median 3-month change in amino-terminal extension peptide of procollagen type 1 [PINP] in women who had a lumbar spine BMD response to teriparatide at 18 months was larger than in women who did not have a lumbar spine BMD response. However, the median 3-month PINP change in lumbar spine BMD nonresponders still exceeded the LSC value of 10 microg/L. Although the percentage of teriparatide-treated women with a hip BMD response that met the 3% criterion was significantly greater than for placebo, there was no significant difference between the percentage of teriparatide 20 microg/day and alendronate 10 mg/day responders in the comparison trial. The baseline characteristics of teriparatide lumbar spine responders and nonresponders were similar. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates that the vast majority of treatment-compliant postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and minimal prior bisphosphonate exposure have a lumbar spine BMD response to teriparatide that meets or exceeds the LSC. The characteristics of teriparatide responders and nonresponders were not significantly different; thus, we were unable to discern any characteristics that could be used to identify potential nonresponders.     

Early changes in biochemical markers of bone formation predict BMD response to teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

The relationship between early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover and the subsequent BMD response to daily teriparatide therapy in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis was studied. Changes in five biochemical markers, obtained from a subset of women enrolled in the Fracture Prevention Trial, were examined. Early increases in the PICP and the PINP were the best predictors of BMD response to teriparatide in this analysis. INTRODUCTION: Early reductions in biochemical markers of bone turnover with antiresorptive therapy negatively correlate with subsequent increases in BMD. We undertook this analysis to determine if early changes in biochemical markers with teriparatide therapy predict subsequent increases in BMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the Fracture Prevention Trial, 1637 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized to receive daily, self-administered, subcutaneous injections of placebo, teriparatide 20 microg/day, or teriparatide 40 microg/day. Serum concentrations of two bone formation markers (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [bone ALP] and the carboxy-terminal extension peptide of procollagen type 1 [PICP]) and urinary concentrations of two bone resorption markers (free deoxypyridinoline [DPD] and N-terminal telopeptide [NTX]) were assessed in a trial population subset (n = 520) at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. We also assessed serum concentrations of another bone formation marker, the amino-terminal extension peptide of procollagen type 1 (PINP), in a subset of 771 women at baseline and 3 months. Lumbar spine (LS) BMD was measured by DXA at baseline and 18 months. Femoral neck BMD was measured at baseline and 12 months. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Baseline bone turnover status correlated positively and significantly with BMD response. The highest correlations occurred for the LS BMD response to teriparatide 20 microg/day. Among all studied biochemical markers, increases in PICP at 1 month and PINP at 3 months correlated best with increases in LS BMD at 18 months (0.65 and 0.61, respectively; p < 0.05). The relationships between these two biochemical markers and the LS BMD response were stronger than the corresponding relationships for the femoral neck BMD response. Using receiver operator curve analysis, we determined that the increases in PICP at 1 month and PINP at 3 months were the most sensitive and accurate predictors of the LS BMD response.     

Assessing the effect of baseline status of serum bone turnover markers and vitamin D levels on efficacy of teriparatide 20 μg/day administered subcutaneously in Japanese patients with osteoporosis

In this previously reported multicenter study, teriparatide 20 μg/day was administered to elderly Japanese subjects (93 % female; median age 70 years) with osteoporosis and at high risk of fracture during a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period, which was followed by a 12 month treatment period in which all subjects received open-label teriparatide. Subjects were randomized 2:1 to teriparatide versus placebo (teriparatide n = 137, placebo-teriparatide n = 70). This was an exploratory analysis to determine whether the baseline status of serum bone turnover markers (BTMs) and vitamin D levels affect the efficacy of teriparatide at 20 μg/day. The BTMs included were type I procollagen N-terminal pro-peptide (P1NP) and type I collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTX). Changes in BMD were analyzed by subgroups: (1) tertile subgroups of BTM; (2) BTM determined by the upper limit of normal; and (3) level of vitamin D. Teriparatide increased lumbar spine BMD in all subgroups by 10 % or more through 24 months. Subgroups with higher baseline BTM levels had greater mean percent changes of lumbar spine BMD through 24 months. The baseline status of vitamin D sufficiency did not impact the mean percent change of lumbar spine BMD through 24 months. Results of this study suggest that clinically significant increases in BMD can be achieved in patients receiving teriparatide regardless of baseline BTM or vitamin D levels. Additionally, when vitamin D is coadministered, vitamin D insufficiency would not be expected to affect the overall efficacy of teriparatide.     

Once-weekly teriparatide reduces serum sclerostin levels in postmenopausal women with osteoprosis

Once-weekly teriparatide treatment is widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan but the mechanisms causing the increase in bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine remain unknown. Methods: This prospective study examined the effects of once-weekly teriparatide treatment on the serum levels of sclerostin, osteocalcin, and bone formation markers as well as BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck in 32 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Results: The mean age of subjects was 76.3 ± 7.0 years old. Teriparatide significantly reduced serum sclerostin levels at 12 and 18 months in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and significantly increased serum osteocalcin levels at 3,12 and 18 months and PINP levels at 1 and 3 months, respectively. Teriparatide treatment significantly increased BMD of the lumbar spine at 6, 12, and 18 months, but did not affect BMD of the femoral neck. Examination of the relationships between percent changes in bone metabolic indices and BMD of the lumbar spine during the teriparatide treatment showed serum sclerostin changes at 3 months were negatively correlated with BMD changes of the lumbar spine at 6, 12, and 18 months. Serum osteocalcin changes were not correlated with BMD changes in the lumbar spine at 12 months. Conclusions: The present study showed that once-weekly teriparatide treatment reduced serum sclerostin levels in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The effects of teriparatide on sclerostin may be associated with the response of the BMD of the lumbar spine.     

PINP as a biological response marker during teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis

Postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis may require treatment with the bone anabolic drug teriparatide. While changes in bone mineral density (BMD) are one measure of response, BMD changes often require a minimum of one year to observe measureable changes. Biochemical markers of bone turnover change within 1 to 3 months of initiating osteoporosis therapy. Monitoring with a marker such as procollagen type I N propeptide (PINP), an osteoblast-derived protein, during teriparatide treatment may provide clinically useful information for managing patients with osteoporosis. Clinical trials have shown consistent increases in PINP within 3 months of initiating teriparatide, increases that are significantly greater than placebo and significantly different from baseline. Increases in PINP concentrations during teriparatide treatment correlate well with increases in skeletal activity assessed by radioisotope bone scans and quantitative bone histomorphometry parameters. Individuals treated with teriparatide in clinical trials usually experienced an increase in PINP > 10 mcg/L from baseline, while those given placebo usually did not. In the clinical setting, patients experiencing a significant increase in PINP > 10 mcg/L after initiating teriparatide therapy may receive an earlier confirmation of anabolic effect, while those who do not may be assessed for adherence, proper injection technique, or undetected secondary conditions that might mitigate an anabolic response. PINP monitoring may provide information supplemental to BMD monitoring and be a useful aid in managing patients receiving anabolic osteoporosis treatment in the same way that biochemical markers of bone resorption are useful in monitoring antiresorptive therapy. This review examines PINP as a biological response marker during teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis.     

Effects of morning vs. evening teriparatide injection on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Summary

A 12-month morning teriparatide (TPTD) administration resulted in a larger increase in the lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) than the evening application. The results indicate that the response of bone cells to teriparatide treatment depends on dosing time.

Introduction

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term effects of the morning vs. the evening teriparatide administration on BMD and bone turnover markers (BTMs) in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Methods

Fifty women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomized to 12-month treatment with 20?μg of TPTD, administered daily in the morning or in the evening. The BMD and serum concentrations of C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRAP 5b) were measured at baseline, after 6 and 12?months. General linear model-repeated measurements were used to analyze the data.

Results

After 12?months, the lumbar spine BMD grew markedly (p?<?0.001) with a significantly greater increase in the morning arm compared to the evening arm (9.1% vs. 4.8%, respectively, p?<?0.05). The BMD at the distal radius significantly decreased (p?<?0.001), with no differences between the arms. The BMD at proximal femur did not change significantly. After 6 months, the BTMs were significantly increased compared with baseline (p?<?0.001). The increases in the evening arm vs. the morning arm, however, were more pronounced in PINP (+358% vs. +215%, respectively) and in TRAP 5b (+70% vs. +37%, respectively) (both p?<?0.05).

Conclusion

12-month morning administration of TPTD resulted in a larger increase in the lumbar spine BMD than the evening application. The timing of TPTD administration may be important for its efficacy.     

Change in lumbar spine BMD and vertebral fracture risk reduction in teriparatide-treated postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Increases in lumbar spine BMD account for 30-41% of the vertebral fracture risk reduction with teriparatide treatment. The remaining fracture risk reduction is caused by improvements in non-BMD determinants of bone strength. INTRODUCTION: Changes in BMD account for a small percentage of the fracture risk reduction seen in patients treated with antiresorptive drugs. The relationship between changes in lumbar spine BMD and vertebral fracture risk reduction with teriparatide treatment has not been assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The relationship between spine BMD and the risk of new vertebral fractures after teriparatide treatment was assessed using data from the Fracture Prevention Trial. Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (n = 1637) were randomized to placebo or teriparatide 20 or 40 microg/day for a median of 19 months. Spine BMD was assessed at baseline and 18 months. Vertebrae whose fracture status changed during the trial were removed from the calculation of BMD. Baseline and endpoint lateral spine radiographs were assessed using a visual semiquantitative technique. RESULTS: Both the baseline and change in spine BMD were contributors to vertebral fracture risk. The mean spine BMD increase in teriparatide-treated patients was 0.09 g/cm(2) across tertiles of baseline spine BMD. Compared with placebo, teriparatide significantly reduced the risk of new vertebral fracture for all endpoint BMD values. Teriparatide-mediated increases in spine BMD accounted for 30% (in the low baseline spine BMD tertile) to 41% (in the high baseline spine BMD tertile) of the reduction in vertebral fracture risk. CONCLUSIONS: Increases in BMD account for approximately one third of the vertebral fracture risk reduction seen with teriparatide. The majority of the risk reduction, however, results from improvements in non-BMD determinants of bone strength.     

Combination teriparatide and raloxifene therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from a 6-month double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

We compared combination treatment with teriparatide plus raloxifene with teriparatide alone in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis in a 6-month double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that measured biochemical markers of bone turnover and BMD. Markers of bone formation and spine BMD increased similarly with teriparatide alone and combination therapy. However, combination therapy induced a significantly smaller increase in bone resorption versus teriparatide alone and significantly increased total hip BMD versus baseline. INTRODUCTION: The effects of combining two approved treatments for osteoporosis with different modes of action were examined by comparing teriparatide [rhPTH(1-34)] monotherapy with combination teriparatide and raloxifene therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 6-month randomized, double-blind trial comparing teriparatide plus raloxifene (n = 69) versus teriparatide plus placebo (n = 68) was conducted in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. RESULTS: Bone formation (N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen [PINP]) increased similarly in both treatment groups. However, the increase in bone resorption (serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen [CTx]) in the combination group was significantly smaller than in the teriparatide-alone group (p = 0.015). Lumbar spine BMD significantly increased 5.19 +/- 0.67% from baseline in the teriparatide-alone group. In the combination group, lumbar spine (6.19 +/- 0.65%), femoral neck (2.23 +/- 0.64%), and total hip (2.31 +/- 0.56%) BMD significantly increased from baseline to study endpoint, and the increase in total hip BMD was significantly greater than in the teriparatide-alone group (p = 0.04). In the teriparatide-alone group, mean serum calcium levels increased from baseline to endpoint (0.30 +/- 0.06 mg/dl, p < 0.001), whereas mean serum phosphate remained unchanged. In the combination group, mean serum calcium was unchanged, and mean serum phosphate decreased (-0.20 +/- 0.06 mg/dl, p < 0.001) from baseline to endpoint. Changes in serum calcium (p < 0.001) and phosphate (p < 0.004) were significantly different between treatment groups. The safety profile of combination therapy was similar to teriparatide alone. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy increased bone formation to a similar degree as teriparatide alone. However, the increase in bone resorption was significantly less and total hip BMD significantly increased for combination therapy compared with teriparatide alone. Combination treatment with raloxifene may thus enhance the bone forming effects of teriparatide. Further studies over longer treatment duration that include fracture endpoints are necessary to fully ascertain the clinical significance of combination raloxifene plus teriparatide therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis.     

Early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover and their relationship with bone mineral density changes after 24?months of treatment with teriparatide

Summary

We report the changes in biochemical markers of bone formation during the first 6?months of teriparatide therapy in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis according to previous antiresorptive treatment. Prior therapy does not adversely affect the response to teriparatide treatment. Similar bone markers levels are reached after 6?months of treatment.

Introduction

The response of biochemical markers of bone turnover with teriparatide therapy in subjects who have previously received osteoporosis drugs is not fully elucidated. We examined biochemical markers of bone formation in women with osteoporosis treated with teriparatide and determined: (1) whether the response is associated with prior osteoporosis therapy, (2) which marker shows the best performance for detecting a response to therapy, and (3) the correlations between early changes in bone markers and subsequent bone mineral density (BMD) changes after 24?months of teriparatide.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, open-label, 24-month study at 95 centers in 10 countries in 758 postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis (n?=?181 treatment-na?ve) who had at least one post-baseline bone marker determination. Teriparatide (20 ??g/day) was administered for up to 24?months. We measured procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (b-ALP), and total alkaline phosphatase (t-ALP) at baseline, 1 and 6?months, and change in BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck from baseline to 24?months.

Results

Significant increases in formation markers occurred after 1?month of teriparatide regardless of prior osteoporosis therapy. The absolute increase at 1?month was lower in previously treated versus treatment-na?ve patients, but after 6?months all groups reached similar levels. PINP showed the best signal-to-noise ratio. Baseline PINP correlated positively and significantly with BMD response at 24?months.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the long-term responsiveness of bone formation markers to teriparatide is not affected in subjects previously treated with antiresorptive drugs.     

Differential effects of teriparatide on BMD after treatment with raloxifene or alendronate.

We investigated the effects of 18 months of treatment with teriparatide in patients previously treated with long-term antiresorptive therapy using bone turnover markers and bone densitometry. Previous raloxifene treatment allowed for teriparatide-induced early bone marker and BMD increases comparable with previously published results for treatment-n?ive patients. Conversely, previous alendronate treatment reduced the bone marker and BMD response. INTRODUCTION: Teriparatide [rhPTH(1-34)] has been shown to increase BMD and reduce the risk of fracture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Our objective was to investigate the skeletal effects of 18 months of treatment with teriparatide in women whose osteoporosis was previously treated with either alendronate or raloxifene. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Daily subcutaneous injections of 20 microg teriparatide were administered for 18 months to 59 postmenopausal women, 60-87 years of age, with BMD T-scores 相似文献   

Effect of Teriparatide on Early Bone Loss After Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplantation is associated with bone loss and a high risk of fractures. Prophylactic treatment of bone is therefore recommended in the early posttransplant period. As a large number of transplant recipients develop adynamic renal osteodystrophy, recombinant parathyroid hormone (rPTH) could be a promising therapeutic option.
In a 6-month double-blind, randomized trial, 26 kidney transplant recipients were treated with daily subcutaneous injections of 20 μg teriparatide (PTH 1–34) or placebo. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral neck, lumbar spine and radial bone was measured at transplantation and after 6 months. Paired bone biopsies for histomorphometric analysis were obtained in six, and for measurement of bone matrix mineralization in five patients of each group. Serologic bone markers were measured at baseline and every 3 months.
A total of 24 out of 26 patients completed the study. Femoral neck BMD was stable in the teriparatide group, but decreased significantly in the placebo group. Lumbar spine and radial BMD, histomorphometric bone volume and bone matrix mineralization status remained unchanged in both groups. Serologic bone markers were similarly reduced in both groups throughout the study.
We conclude that teriparatide does not improve BMD early after kidney transplantation. Neither histological analysis nor bone markers provide evidence of improved bone turnover or mineralization.     

Effects of intravenous zoledronic acid plus subcutaneous teriparatide [rhPTH(1–34)] in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Clinical data suggest concomitant therapy with bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone (PTH) may blunt the anabolic effect of PTH; rodent models suggest that infrequently administered bisphosphonates may interact differently. To evaluate the effects of combination therapy with an intravenous infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg and daily subcutaneous recombinant human (rh)PTH(1–34) (teriparatide) 20 µg versus either agent alone on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers, we conducted a 1‐year multicenter, multinational, randomized, partial double‐blinded, controlled trial. 412 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (mean age 65 ± 9 years) were randomized to a single infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg plus daily subcutaneous teriparatide 20 µg (n = 137), zoledronic acid alone (n = 137), or teriparatide alone (n = 138). The primary endpoint was percentage increase in lumbar spine BMD (assessed by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry [DXA]) at 52 weeks versus baseline. Secondary endpoints included change in BMD at the spine at earlier time points and at the total hip, trochanter, and femoral neck at all time points. At week 52, lumbar spine BMD had increased 7.5%, 7.0%, and 4.4% in the combination, teriparatide, and zoledronic acid groups, respectively (p < .001 for combination and teriparatide versus zoledronic acid). In the combination group, spine BMD increased more rapidly than with either agent alone (p < .001 versus both teriparatide and zoledronic acid at 13 and 26 weeks). Combination therapy increased total‐hip BMD more than teriparatide alone at all times (all p < .01) and more than zoledronic acid at 13 weeks (p < .05), with final 52‐week increments of 2.3%, 1.1%, and 2.2% in the combination, teriparatide, and zoledronic acid groups, respectively. With combination therapy, bone formation (assessed by serum N‐terminal propeptide of type I collagen [PINP]) increased from 0 to 4 weeks, declined minimally from 4 to 8 weeks, and then rose throughout the trial, with levels above baseline from 6 to 12 months. Bone resorption (assessed by serum β‐C‐telopeptide of type I collagen [β‐CTX]) was markedly reduced with combination therapy from 0 to 8 weeks (a reduction of similar magnitude to that seen with zoledronic acid alone), followed by a gradual increase after week 8, with levels remaining above baseline for the latter half of the year. Levels for both markers were significantly lower with combination therapy versus teriparatide alone (p < .002). Limitations of the study included its short duration, lack of endpoints beyond DXA‐based BMD (e.g., quantitative computed tomography and finite‐element modeling for bone strength), lack of teriparatide placebo, and insufficient power for fracture outcomes. We conclude that while teriparatide increases spine BMD more than zoledronic acid and zoledronic acid increases hip BMD more than teriparatide, combination therapy provides the largest, most rapid increments when both spine and hip sites are considered. © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.     

Positive effect of alendronate on bone mineral density and markers of bone turnover in patients with rheumatoid arthritis on chronic treatment with low-dose prednisone: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Introduction Alendronate has been described to have a bone-sparing effect in patients treated with moderate and high dosages of prednisone for heterogeneous diseases, however no data are available on groups of patients with the same underlying diseases who receive chronic low-dose prednisone treatment. The objective of the investigation reported here was, therefore, to study the effect of alendronate on bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and hips in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are on chronic low-dose prednisone treatment. Methods A total of 163 patients with RA, according to the ACR-criteria, were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The patients were treated with low-dose prednisone (≤10 mg/day) for at least 3 months. The patients were randomized to receive daily doses of alendronate or placebo: men and premenopausal women received 5 mg alendronate (or placebo) daily; postmenopausal women received 10 mg alendronate (or placebo) daily. All patients received daily calcium (500 mg, or 1000 mg, depending on baseline dietary calcium intake) and vitamin D₃ (400 IU) supplementation. BMD of the lumbar spine (L1–L4) and the (total) hip was measured at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. The primary endpoint was change in BMD of the lumbar spine after 12 months (ITT). At baseline and after 3 and 12 months, serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and urinary excretion of N-telopeptide (NTX) were measured. Radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine were made at baseline and after 12 months and subsequently scored for vertebral deformities. Results The groups were comparable at baseline in age, gender, daily dosage of prednisone, BMD at the spine and the hip and markers of bone turnover, while the number of patients with prevalent vertebral deformities was slightly higher in the alendronate-treated patients (54% versus 39%, not significant). After 12 months, BMD at the lumbar spine had increased by 3.7% in the alendronate-treated patients and decreased by –1.0% in the placebo-treated patients (p<0.0001); at the hip, the changes were +1.0% and –0.1%, respectively (not significant). After 3 months, serum BAP had decreased by 16.9% in the alendronate group versus 3.3% in the placebo group (p=0.0005), while urinary NTX had decreased by 46.4% in the alendronate group versus 12.1% in the placebo group (p<0.0001). After 12 months, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups with respect to number of patients with incident vertebral or non-vertebral fractures. Adverse effects were relatively common in these patients with severe RA: adverse effects were observed in 68% of the alendronate-treated patients and in 73% of the placebo patients (not significant), while serious adverse events were observed in 13% and 17%, respectively (not significant). Conclusion We observed a favourable effect of alendronate on the BMD of the lumbar spine and on the markers of bone turnover in patients with RA treated with low-dose prednisone. These data support the conclusion that the prescribing of alendronate is not only beneficial in patients treated with high-dose prednisone but also in RA patients chronically treated with low-dose prednisone. This trial was financially supported by a grant from MSD, The Netherlands     

A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in men with idiopathic osteoporosis: effects on bone mineral density and bone markers.

In a 12-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we have studied the effects of intranasal salmon calcitonin (SCT) on bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover. Twenty-eight men with idiopathic osteoporosis aged 27-74 years (mean, 52.4 years) were randomized to receive either nasal SCT (200 IU) or a nasal placebo daily for a period of 1 year. All the men received a daily supplement of 0.5 g of calcium. The men who received SCT had a mean (+/-SEM) increase in BMD of 7.1 +/- 1.7% at the lumbar spine. In contrast, the men who received the placebo had an increase of 2.4 +/- 1.5% (p > 0.05) for the comparison with baseline. The increase in lumbar BMD in the calcitonin group was significantly greater than that in the placebo group (p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in the femoral neck, trochanter, or Ward's triangle relative to both baseline and placebo after 12 months. Treatment with nasal SCT resulted in a significantly pronounced suppression of bone resorption markers (urinary deoxypyridinoline [DPD], type I cross-linked N-telopeptide [NTX], and type I cross-linked C-telopeptide [CTX]) and to a lesser extent in bone formation markers (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [BALP], osteocalcin [OC], serum C-terminal procollagen type I extension peptides [PICP], and serum N-termnal procollagen type I extension peptides [PINP]), whereas the placebo did not. Therapy was tolerated well and there were no treatment-related adverse events. We conclude that intranasal SCT (200 IU daily) is safe and effective in increasing lumbar BMD and reducing bone turnover in men with idiopathic osteoporosis.     

Greater Gains in Spine and Hip Strength for Romosozumab Compared With Teriparatide in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass

Romosozumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits sclerostin and has been shown to reduce the risk of fractures within 12 months. In a phase II, randomized, placebo‐controlled clinical trial of treatment‐naïve postmenopausal women with low bone mass, romosozumab increased bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip and spine by the dual effect of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption. In a substudy of that trial, which included placebo and teriparatide arms, here we investigated whether those observed increases in BMD also resulted in improvements in estimated strength, as assessed by finite element analysis. Participants received blinded romosozumab s.c. (210 mg monthly) or placebo, or open‐label teriparatide (20 μg daily) for 12 months. CT scans, obtained at the lumbar spine (n = 82) and proximal femur (n = 46) at baseline and month 12, were analyzed with finite element software (VirtuOst, O.N. Diagnostics) to estimate strength for a simulated compression overload for the spine (L₁ vertebral body) and a sideways fall for the proximal femur, all blinded to treatment assignment. We found that, at month 12, vertebral strength increased more for romosozumab compared with both teriparatide (27.3% versus 18.5%; p = 0.005) and placebo (27.3% versus –3.9%; p < 0.0001); changes in femoral strength for romosozumab showed similar but smaller changes, increasing more with romosozumab versus teriparatide (3.6% versus –0.7%; p = 0.027), and trending higher versus placebo (3.6% versus ?0.1%; p = 0.059). Compartmental analysis revealed that the bone‐strengthening effects for romosozumab were associated with positive contributions from both the cortical and trabecular bone compartments at both the lumbar spine and hip. Taken together, these findings suggest that romosozumab may offer patients with osteoporosis a new bone‐forming therapeutic option that increases both vertebral and femoral strength within 12 months. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.     

Effects of teriparatide in Japanese and non-Japanese populations: bridging findings on pharmacokinetics and efficacy

Teriparatide is an anabolic therapy for osteoporosis approved in the United States since 2002 and European Union since 2003; however, approval in Japan lagged significantly. This report describes analyses based on International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E-5 guidelines that support bridging between Japanese studies and the large Fracture Prevention Trial (FPT). We analyzed data from single teriparatide doses in healthy Japanese and Caucasian postmenopausal women (J-PK) and from studies of 6 months [Phase 2, dose ranging (J-Ph2)] and 12 months [Phase 3, efficacy and safety (J-Ph3)] of randomized, placebo-controlled, once-daily treatment in Japanese subjects with osteoporosis. In J-PK, apparent teriparatide area-under-the-curve (AUC) and peak concentration (C (max)) were up to 40% higher in Japanese versus Caucasian women; however, body weight-adjusted values were comparable between populations; these findings were supported by population pharmacokinetic analyses. Between the FPT and Japanese studies, baseline demographic characteristics were similar but bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine (L1-L4) and body weight were lower for Japanese subjects. With teriparatide 20 μg/day, significant increases in BMD were observed compared to placebo at 12 months in both the FPT and J-Ph3 study, and percent change and actual change in BMD were comparable between studies. Dose response at 6 months was also comparable across populations. No novel safety signals were identified in Japanese subjects. These analyses show that teriparatide clinical data met ICH E-5 criteria for bridging. Findings from foreign trials such as the FPT can thus be extrapolated to Japanese subjects treated with teriparatide 20 μg/day.     

Effect of denosumab on bone density and turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass after long-term continued, discontinued, and restarting of therapy: a randomized blinded phase 2 clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL), an essential mediator of osteoclast formation, function, and survival that has been shown to decrease bone turnover and increase bone mineral density (BMD) in treated patients. We assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of denosumab, and the effects of discontinuing and restarting denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. METHODS: Postmenopausal women with a lumbar spine T-score of -1.8 to -4.0 or proximal femur T-score of -1.8 to -3.5 were randomized to denosumab every 3 months (Q3M; 6, 14, or 30 mg) or every 6 months (Q6M; 14, 60, 100, or 210 mg); placebo; or open-label oral alendronate weekly. After 24 months, patients receiving denosumab either continued treatment at 60 mg Q6M for an additional 24 months, discontinued therapy, or discontinued treatment for 12 months then re-initiated denosumab (60 mg Q6M) for 12 months. The placebo cohort was maintained. Alendronate-treated patients discontinued alendronate and were followed. Changes in BMD and bone turnover markers (BTM) as well as safety outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 262/412 (64%) patients completed 48 months of study. Continuous, long-term denosumab treatment increased BMD at the lumbar spine (9.4% to 11.8%) and total hip (4.0% to 6.1%). BTM were consistently suppressed over 48 months. Discontinuation of denosumab was associated with a BMD decrease of 6.6% at the lumbar spine and 5.3% at the total hip within the first 12 months of treatment discontinuation. Retreatment with denosumab increased lumbar spine BMD by 9.0% from original baseline values. Levels of BTM increased upon discontinuation and decreased with retreatment. Adverse event rates were similar among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with low BMD, long-term denosumab treatment led to gains in BMD and reduction of BTM throughout the course of the study. The effects on bone turnover were fully reversible with discontinuation and restored with subsequent retreatment.     

Effect of teriparatide on bone mineral density and biochemical markers in Japanese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a 6-month dose-response study

The dose-response efficacy and safety with three doses of teriparatide and placebo was assessed, using oncedaily subcutaneous injections for 24 weeks, in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture for reasons of preexisting fracture(s), advanced age, and/or low bone mineral density (BMD). In this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 159 subjects were randomized and 154 subjects were included for analysis. Teriparatide (10-μg, 20-μg, and 40-μg doses) showed a statistically significant increase with increasing treatment dose as assessed by the percent change of lumbar spine BMD from baseline to endpoint using Williams’ test when compared with placebo (P < 0.001). The mean (±SD) percent change in lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip BMD with the 20-μg dose from baseline to endpoint was 6.40% ± 4.76%, 1.83% ± 7.13%, and 1.91% ± 3.60%, respectively. Rapid and sustained increases in bone formation markers [type I procollagen N-terminal propeptide (PINP), type I procollagen C-terminal propeptide (PICP), and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP)], followed by late increases in a bone resorption marker [type I collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTX)], were observed for the teriparatide treatment groups (20-μg, 40-μg), suggesting a persistent, positive, balanced anabolic effect of teriparatide. Optimal adherence was achieved by this daily self-injection treatment. Regarding safety, most of the adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. No study drug-or study procedure-related serious adverse events were reported during the treatment period. These results observed in Japanese patients may support the observation that teriparatide stimulates bone formation in patients with osteoporosis at a high risk of fracture.     

Impact of bisphosphonate wash-out prior to teriparatide therapy in clinical practice

Concurrent use of bisphosphonate therapy reduces the anabolic effect of teriparatide. Consequently, in clinical practice bisphosphonates are discontinued and teriparatide therapy held for a few months to allow bone turnover to increase. We aimed to evaluate the effect of prior bisphosphonate exposure and the effect of bisphosphonate wash-out on the treatment response to teriparatide. Thirty-nine patients with primary osteoporosis (mean age 63.6 ± 14.0 years), including 26 patients previously treated with oral bisphosphonates (median duration 53 months) and 13 bisphosphonate-naïve patients were started on teriparatide (20 μg daily) and followed prospectively over 12 months. The primary study outcome was change in bone formation markers (PINP, bone ALP, osteocalcin). Secondary outcomes included changes in bone resorption (βCTX) and 12-month changes in BMD. Markers of bone formation increased early during teriparatide therapy and were followed by an increase in βCTX (p < 0.001). The magnitude of the increase in bone markers was comparable in both patient groups irrespective of prior bisphosphonate exposure; similarly, increases in BMD after 12 months were not significantly different between bisphosphonate-pretreated and bisphosphonate-naïve patients (lumbar spine 7.1 vs. 8.9%, p = 0.58; total hip 4.1 vs. 1.1%, p = 0.48). The response of teriparatide was not related to the duration of bisphosphonate wash-out (median duration 4.2 months). This study confirms that beneficial effects of teriparatide on intermediate bone endpoints can be translated into clinical practice with less constringent methodological circumstances than in RCTs. Furthermore, as bisphosphonate wash-out does not appear to influence the treatment effect, teriparatide therapy can be started immediately after ceasing bisphosphonate therapy and wash-out.