Is outcome worse in a small volume Canadian trauma centre?

The minimum number of seriously injured patients required to maintain clinical competence and achieve acceptable clinical competence in a single trauma centre is unknown. It has been suggested that the probability of survival is improved in hospitals treating greater than 200 trauma patients annually. We sought to determine if probability of survival was lower in our small volume centre. Between 1986 and 1989, 752 (522 male, 230 female; average age, 36 years) trauma patients were admitted to our institution. The major mechanism of injury was blunt (89%). All patients underwent trauma severity scoring. Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, and a Revised Trauma Score were used to derived the probability of survival by the TRISS method. The mean Injury Severity Score was 23.3 and the mean Trauma Score was 13.2. The overall mortality rate was 15.8%. The Z statistic demonstrated no significant difference between actual and predicted deaths for the 4-year period or for any individual year (range, -1.05 to 1.26, p greater than 0.05). The M statistic was 0.753. We conclude that, despite fewer trauma patient admissions (less than 200 per year), comparable clinical results can be achieved by surgeons dedicated to trauma management.     

Mortality in adolescent girls vs boys following traumatic shock: an analysis of the National Pediatric Trauma Registry

HYPOTHESIS: Female sex imparts a survival benefit after traumatic injury in children. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Review of patients (aged 0-17 years) included in the National Pediatric Trauma Registry between April 1994 and September 2001. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of sex on mortality, adjusting for age, severity of injury (New Injury Severity Score and Pediatric Trauma Score), severity of head or extremity injury, injury mechanism, intent, and comorbidities. Subset analysis focused on severely injured children (New Injury Severity Score >or= 16) with shock (systolic blood pressure 相似文献   

Early unreamed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures is safe in patients with severe thoracic trauma

BACKGROUND: The timing of fixation of femoral fractures in multiply injured patients with severe thoracic trauma is discussed controversially. Some authors recommend damage control surgery, whereas other authors prefer early definitive treatment. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of early definitive fixation of femoral fractures on outcomes in multiply injured patients with severe thoracic trauma. METHODS: Between May 1, 1998 and December 31, 2004, 578 severely injured patients were admitted to our institution. Forty-five patients met the inclusion criteria for the study cohort (severe thoracic trauma and femoral fracture stabilized with unreamed intramedullary nailing [IMN] within the first 24 hours) and 107 patients were selected for the control cohort (severe thoracic trauma without any lower extremity fracture). Inclusion criteria for both cohorts were age 15 to 55 years with blunt trauma (e.g. motor vehicle collisions, falls) including severe thoracic trauma (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score >or=3) and Injury Severity Score (ISS) >or=18. For comparison between the cohorts data on patients status (Glasgow Coma Scale score at arrival, Revised Trauma Score, Trauma and Injury Severity Score survival prognosis, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score), treatment (intubation rate, thoracic drainage, surgery), and outcomes (duration of intensive care unit stay and ventilation, rate of adult respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS], multiple organ failure syndrome [MOFS], and mortality) were selected from hospital databases. Dichotomous data were analyzed by chi test; continuous data were analyzed by Student's t test. Any values of p < 0.05 were considered significant for any test. RESULTS: Both cohorts were comparable with regard to demographic data, ISS, AIS score in the thoracic region, and incidence and severity of brain injury. There was no difference in dependent parameters in both cohorts. Rates of ARDS, MOFS, and mortality were not negatively influenced by early unreamed IMN. CONCLUSION: Early unreamed IMN of femoral fractures in multiply injured patients with severe thoracic trauma is a safe procedure and seems to be justified to achieve early definitive care.     

Major trauma with multiple injuries in German children: a retrospective review

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the demographics, mechanisms, pattern, injury severity, and the outcome (ie, length of intensive care unit [ICU] stay, length of mechanical ventilation, total length of stay, mortality) in multiple-injured children based on a review from the German trauma registry study ("Traumaregister") of the German Society of Trauma Surgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie e.V.). METHODS: One hundred three German trauma centers took part in the German trauma registry study from January 1997 to December 2003. Five hundred seventeen children (aged 0-15 years) with multiple injuries and an Injury Severity Score of more than 15 in comparison to 11,025 adults were included. Sex, age, and mechanisms and pattern of injury were assessed. The mechanisms of trauma and the anatomical distribution of severe injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale of 3 or more) were analyzed. The Injury Severity Score, the Revised Trauma Score, and the Trauma Score Injury Severity Score were calculated to estimate the severity of injury and mortality. RESULTS: The predominant sex was male. Most cases were caused by traffic-related accidents. Head injuries were most common in children, and severe thoracic injuries increased with age. Mean length of ICU treatment, mechanical ventilation, and total length of stay were shorter in children than in adults. A total of 22.6% of the children aged 0 to 5 years died in the hospital in comparison with in-hospital mortality rate of 13.7% in the 6- to 10-, 20.3% in the 11- to 15-, and 17.0% in the 16- to 55-year-old patients. CONCLUSIONS: There were differences between multiple-injured children and adults concerning injury mechanisms and pattern of injuries. Adults needed a longer mechanical ventilation and a longer ICU therapy. Most deaths could be seen in the youngest patients aged 0 to 5 years.     

Prehospital endotracheal intubation for trauma does not improve survival over bag-valve-mask ventilation

BACKGROUND: Few data exist supporting a survival benefit to prehospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) over bag-valve-mask ventilation (BVM) in trauma patients. METHODS: Data were reviewed from all trauma patients transported to our Level I trauma center receiving prehospital ETI or BVM. Mortality was adjusted by age, Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, and mechanism of injury (penetrating vs. blunt). RESULTS: Of 5,773 patients, 316 (5.5%) had ETI and 217 (3.8%) had BVM. Patients receiving ETI were significantly more like to die (88.9% vs. 30.9%, p < 0.0001). When corrected for Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, and mechanism of injury, ETI was associated with similar or greater mortality than BVM. ETI patients had longer prehospital times (22.0 vs. 20.1 minutes, p = 0.0241). CONCLUSION: In our trauma system, when corrected for mechanism and severity of anatomic and physiologic injury, ETI confers no survival advantage over BVM and slightly increases prehospital time.     

Beta-blocker exposure is associated with improved survival after severe traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND: Beta-blocker use in elective noncardiac surgery has been associated with a reduction in mortality and cardiovascular complications. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often associated with a hyperadrenergic state. We hypothesized that adrenergic blockade would confer improved survival among TBI patients. METHODS: Retrospective review of the Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons database at a Level I trauma center was conducted. All trauma patients admitted from January 2004 to March 2005 with head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 or greater were evaluated. Patients with length of stay <4 or >30 days were excluded. Beta-blocker exposure was defined as receiving beta-blockers for 2 or more consecutive days. RESULTS: In all, 420 patients met inclusion criteria: 174 patients exposed to beta-blockers [BB(+)] and 246 not exposed [BB(-)]. Mean age in BB(+) group was 50 years and 36 years in BB(-) group (p < 0.001). Mean Injury Severity Score was 33.6 for BB(+) group and 30.8 for BB(-) group (p = 0.01). Predicted survival (by Trauma and Injury Severity Score) for BB(+) group was 59.1% compared with 70.3% for BB(-) group (p < 0.001). Observed mortality for BB(+) group was 5.1%, 10.8% for BB(-) group (p = 0.036). Adjusted incidence rate ratio of mortality among those exposed to beta-blockers compared with those not exposed was 0.29 (95% confidence interval). CONCLUSIONS: Beta-blocker exposure was associated with a significant reduction in mortality in patients with severe TBI. This reduction in mortality is even more impressive, considering that the BB(+) group was older, more severely injured, and had lower predicted survival.     

Geriatric trauma: injury patterns and outcome

Over a 2-year period, 100 consecutive patients more than 70 years of age with multiple injuries were evaluated at a metropolitan trauma center for injury patterns and factors that affected survival. The analysis incorporated mechanism of injury, body region affected, Injury Severity Score, shock, change from level of prehospital function, and mortality. The mortality for the group was 15%. It was found that the Injury Severity Score was not predictive of survival in the elderly injured. However, central nervous system injury (p less than 0.01) and hypovolemic shock (p less than 0.001) were predictive of survival. While 85% of the injured patients survived, 88% of these did not return to their previous level of independence.     

Prediction of outcomes in trauma: anatomic or physiologic parameters?

BACKGROUND: Prediction of outcomes after injury has traditionally incorporated measures of injury severity, but recent studies suggest that including physiologic and shock measures can improve accuracy of anatomic-based models. A recent single-institution study described a mortality predictive equation [f(x) = 3.48 - .22 (GCS) - .08 (BE) + .08 (Tx) + .05 (ISS) + .04 (Age)], where GSC is Glasgow Coma Score, BE is base excess, Tx is transfusion requirement, and ISS is Injury Severity Score, which had 63% sensitivity, 94% specificity, (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] 0.96), but did not provide comparative data for other models. We have previously documented that the Physiologic Trauma Score, including only physiologic variables (systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Glasgow Coma Score, age) also accurately predicts mortality in trauma. The objective of this study was to compare the predictive abilities of these statistical models in trauma outcomes. METHODS: Area under the ROC curve of sensitivity versus 1-specificity was used to assess predictive ability and measured discrimination of the models. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 15,534 trauma patients (80% blunt mechanism) admitted to a Level I trauma center over a 3-year period (mean age 37 +/- 18 years; mean Injury Severity Score 10 +/- 10; mortality 4%). Sensitivity of the new predictive model was 45%, specificity was 96%, ROC was 0.91, validating this new trauma outcomes model in our institution. This was comparable with area under the ROC for Revised Trauma Score (ROC 0.88), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (ROC 0.97), and Physiologic Trauma Score (ROC 0.95), but superior compared with admission Glasgow Coma Score (ROC 0.79), Injury Severity Score (ROC 0.79), and age (ROC 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: The predictive ability of this new model is superior to anatomic-based models such as Injury Severity Score, but comparable with other physiologic-based models such as Revised Trauma Score, Physiologic Trauma Score and Trauma, and Injury Severity Score.     

Trauma management in the end-stage renal disease patient

More than 230,000 patients in the United States are being treated for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This group of patients has not been evaluated for trauma resource use. When these patients are involved in trauma the need for dialysis and awareness of chronic disease processes must be considered in addition to their injuries. There were 4,894 patients admitted to a Level II trauma center over a 4-year period. Fifty-nine of these patients were considered to have ESRD before admission. The charts of these patients were reviewed and compared with those in the general trauma population. The average age of the ESRD patients was 58 years with an average Injury Severity Score of 8 as compared with 31 years of age and Injury Severity Score of 10.9 for the general trauma population. Thirty-four patients required hemodialysis within 48 hours of admission. Ten patients required mechanical ventilation. Eight patients in this study died. The complication and mortality rates among the ESRD patients were 50.8 per cent and 13.5 per cent respectively as compared with 16.3 and 4.7 per cent among the general trauma population. The trauma complication and mortality rates among ESRD patients are approximately three times greater than those in the general trauma population. Because of their coexisting medical problems and the need for dialysis trauma patients with ESRD should be cared for in trauma centers with dialysis capability and access to multidisciplinary services.     

Use of injury severity variables in determining disability and community integration after traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcome is important in managing traumatic brain injury (TBI), an epidemic in the United States. Many injury severity variables have been shown to predict major morbidity and mortality. Less is known about their relationship with specific long-term outcomes. METHODS: Glasgow Coma Scale, Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score, along with other demographic and premorbid values, were obtained for 378 consecutive patients hospitalized after TBI at a Level I trauma center between September 1997 and May 1998. Of this cohort, 120 patients were contacted for 1-year follow-up assessment with the Disability Rating Scale, Community Integration Questionnaire, and employment data. RESULTS: Univariate analyses showed these to be significant single predictors of 1-year outcome. Multivariate analyses revealed that the Revised Trauma Score and Glasgow Coma Scale had significant additive value in predicting injury variables Disability Rating Scale scores when combined with other demographic and premorbid variables studied. Predictive models of 1-year outcome were developed. CONCLUSION: Injury severity variables are significant single outcome predictors and, in combination with premorbid and demographic variables, help predict long-term disability and community integration for individuals hospitalized with TBI.     

Children in Sweden admitted to intensive care after trauma

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to describe the demographics, injuries, mechanisms and severity of injury, prehospital and hospital care during the first 24h, and patient outcome, in the most severely injured children cared for following trauma at a paediatric intensive care unit in Sweden. METHODS: The medical records of 131 traumatised children (0-16 years of age), admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit in Gothenburg from January 1990 to October 2000, were retrospectively examined. Nine internationally recognised scoring systems were used to calculate severity of injury, in order to predict the chances of patient survival. RESULTS: Paediatric trauma was more common in boys (68%). The mean age at injury was 7.9 years (S.D. 4.7 years). Traffic-related accidents (40%) and falls (34%) were the leading causes of injury. Injuries to the head were the most frequent, forming 24% of all injuries. Severity of injury was recorded as an Injury Severity Score median of 14, Trauma Score Injury Severity Score median of 99% and Paediatric Risk of Mortality Score median of 0.69%. The mortality rate was 3%. CONCLUSION: Trauma with admission to a paediatric intensive care unit is rare in a Swedish paediatric population. When cared for at a centre with the necessary facilities and trained personnel, these children have a good chance of survival.     

Prediction of mortality in pediatric trauma patients: new injury severity score outperforms injury severity score in the severely injured

BACKGROUND: The Injury Severity Score (ISS) is a widely accepted method of measuring severity of traumatic injury. A modification has been proposed--the New Injury Severity Score (NISS). This has been shown to predict mortality better in adult trauma patients, but it had no predictive benefit in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether the NISS outperforms the ISS in a large pediatric trauma population. METHODS: Admissions in the National Pediatric Trauma Registry between April 1996 and September 1999 were included. The ISS and NISS were calculated for each patient. The study endpoints were mortality at hospital discharge, functional outcome in three domains (expression, locomotion, and feeding), and discharge disposition for the survivors. Predictive ability of each score was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: The NISS and ISS performed equally well at predicting mortality in patients with lower injury severity (ISS < 25), but the NISS was significantly better at predicting mortality in the more severely injured patients. Both scores performed equally well at predicting expression and feeding ability. The NISS was superior to the ISS in predicting locomotion ability at discharge. Thirty-seven percent of patients had an NISS that was higher than their ISS. These patients had a significantly higher mortality and suffered worse functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: The NISS performs as well as the ISS in pediatric patients with lower injury severity and outperforms the ISS in those with higher injury severity.     

Is preoperative period associated with severity and unexpected death of injured patients needing emergency trauma surgery?

Purpose

Early operative control of hemorrhage is the key to saving the lives of severe trauma patients. We investigated whether emergency room (ER) stay time [time from the ER to the operating room (OR)] is associated with trauma severity and unexpected trauma death [Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) method-based probability of survival (Ps) ≥0.5 but died] of injured patients needing emergency trauma surgery.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of all trauma patients requiring emergency surgery and all patients with pelvic fractures requiring transcatheter arterial embolization at our hospital from January 2002 to December 2012. We analyzed the relationships among injury severity on ER admission [Injury Severity Score (ISS); Revised Trauma Score (RTS); Ps; Shock Index (SI); American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS)]; mortality rate; unexpected trauma death rate; and ER stay time.

Results

ER stay times were significantly shorter for patients with life-threatening conditions [RTS <6.0 (p < 0.01), Ps <0.5 (p < 0.001), SI ≥1.0 (p < 0.01), and ASA-PS ≥4E (p < 0.001)]. In particular, ER stay time was inversely related to injury severity up to 120 min. The risk of unexpected trauma death significantly increased as ER stay time increased over 90 min (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that all medical staff should work together effectively on high-risk patients in the ER, bringing them immediately to the OR according to their level of risk. If injured patients need emergency trauma surgery, ER stay times should be kept as short as possible to reduce unexpected trauma death.     

Long-term fetal outcomes in pregnant trauma patients

BACKGROUND: Trauma during pregnancy is associated with significant maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality, typically occurring during the hospital admission. Less is known about the delayed effects of trauma on pregnancy outcome once the patient has been discharged from the hospital with a viable fetus. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of pregnant trauma patients who were discharged from the trauma center with a viable fetus. Risk of preterm delivery (PTD) and low birth weight (LBW) were compared between injured patients (Injury Severity Score > 0) and those without identified injury (Injury Severity Score = 0), for the remainder of pregnancy. RESULTS: Even after trauma center discharge, injured patients had a nearly 2-fold higher risk of PTD (relative risk, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.3) and LBW (relative risk, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-3.2) for the remainder of the pregnancy. The risk was higher with increasing injury severity and among those injured early in gestation. CONCLUSION: The risk of PTD and LBW in pregnant trauma patients who were discharged from trauma centers with a viable fetus remains increased throughout the remainder of the pregnancy. A history of trauma during gestation is a risk factor for poor pregnancy outcome.     

Early fracture fixation may be "just fine" after head injury: no difference in central nervous system outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest that early fracture fixation worsens central nervous system (CNS) outcomes. We compared discharge Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, CNS complications, and mortality of severely injured adults with head injuries and pelvic/lower extremity fractures treated with early versus delayed fixation. METHODS: Using trauma registry data, records meeting preselected inclusion criteria from the years 1991 to 1995 were examined. We identified 171 patients aged 14 to 65 years (mean age, 32.7 years) with head injuries and fractures who underwent early fixation (< or = 24 hours after admission) (n = 147) versus delayed fixation (> 24 hours after admission) (n = 24). RESULTS: Patients were severely injured, with a mean admission GCS score of 9.1, Revised Trauma Score of 6.2, Injury Severity Score of 38, median intensive care unit length of stay of 16.5 days, and hospital length of stay of 23 days. No differences between groups were found by age, admission GCS score, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, intensive care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, shock, vasopressors, major nonorthopedic operative procedures, total intravenous fluids or blood products, or mortality rates. In survivors, no differences in discharge GCS scores or CNS complications were found. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence to suggest that early fracture fixation negatively influences CNS outcomes or mortality.     

Relationship between American College of Surgeons trauma center designation and mortality in patients with severe trauma (injury severity score > 15)

BACKGROUND: We studied the association of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma center designation and mortality in adult patients with severe trauma (Injury Severity Score > 15). ACS designation of trauma centers into different levels requires substantial financial and human resources commitments. There is very little work published on the association of ACS trauma center designation and outcomes in severe trauma. STUDY DESIGN: National Trauma Data Bank study including all adult trauma admissions (older than 14 years of age) with Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15. The relationship between ACS level of trauma designation and survival outcomes was evaluated after adjusting for age, mechanism of injury, ISS, hypotension on admission, severe liver trauma, aortic, vena cava, iliac vascular, and penetrating cardiac injuries. RESULTS: A total of 130,154 patients from 256 trauma centers met the inclusion criteria. Adjusted mortality in ACS-designated Level II centers and undesignated centers was notably higher than in Level I centers (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09-120; p < 0.0001 and adjusted odds ratio, 1.09; CI, 1.05-1.13; p < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Severely injured patients with ISS > 15 treated in ACS Level I trauma centers have considerably better survival outcomes than those treated in ACS Level II centers.     

Do pediatric trauma centers have better survival rates than adult trauma centers? An examination of the National Pediatric Trauma Registry

BACKGROUND: Pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) were developed to improve the survival of injured children, but it is currently unknown if children admitted to PTCs are more likely to survive than those admitted to adult trauma centers (ATCs). METHODS: Fifty-three thousand one hundred thirteen pediatric trauma cases from 22 PTCs and 31 ATCs included in the National Pediatric Trauma Registry were reviewed to evaluate survival rates at PTCs and ATCs. RESULTS: Overall, 1,259 children died. The raw mortality rate was lower at PTCs (1.81% of 32,554 children) than at ATCs (3.88% of 18,368 children). However, patients admitted to ATCs were more severely injured. When Injury Severity Score, Pediatric Trauma Score, mechanism (blunt or penetrating), gender, age, clustering, and American College of Surgeons (ACS) verification status were controlled for using a single logistic regression model, there was no statistically significant difference in survival between PTCs and ATCs (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.26; p = 0.587). A similar comparison of the 12 ACS-verified trauma centers with the 41 nonverified centers showed verification to be associated with improved survival (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.97; p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Although PTCs have higher overall survival rates than ATCs, this difference disappears when the analysis controls for Injury Severity Score, Pediatric Trauma Score, age, mechanism, and ACS verification status. ACS-verified centers have significantly higher survival rates than do unverified centers.     

Impact of cirrhosis on outcomes in trauma

BACKGROUND: Cirrhosis as an independent predictor of poor outcomes in trauma patients was identified in 1990. We hypothesized that the degree of preinjury hepatic dysfunction is, by itself, an independent predictor of mortality. STUDY DESIGN: The trauma registry at our Level I trauma center was queried for all ICD-9 codes for liver disease from 1999 to 2003, and patients were categorized as having Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class A, B, or C cirrhosis. Data analyzed included age, mechanism of injury, Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), hospital length of stay, ventilator days, procedures performed, transfusion of blood products, admission lactate, base deficit, and mortality. Trauma Related Injury Severity Score (TRISS) methodology was used to calculate the probability of survival. Outcomes data were analyzed, and statistical comparison was performed using group t-test. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients meeting study criteria, 31 had alcohol-related cirrhosis, 18 had a history of hepatitis C, and 1 had cryptogenic cirrhosis. Twenty (40%) met CTP A classification, 16 (32%) met CTP B criteria, and 14 (28%) had CTP class C cirrhosis. One death occurred in the CTP A and B groups. Comparison between the five survivors and nine nonsurvivors from CTP class C showed no statistical significance in terms of age, ISS, TRISS, or GCS. CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rate for class C cirrhotic patients posttrauma continues to be higher than that predicted by TRISS, although patients with less severe hepatic dysfunction do not appear to have significantly lower than predicted survival. The degree of hepatic dysfunction remains an independent predictor of mortality and CTP C criteria must be considered when determining outcomes for patients posttrauma.     

Is the Kampala Trauma Score an Effective Predictor of Mortality in Low-Resource Settings? A Comparison of Multiple Trauma Severity Scores

Background

In the developed world, multiple injury severity scores have been used for trauma patient evaluation and study. However, few studies have supported the effectiveness of different trauma scoring methods in the developing world. The Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) was developed for use in resource-limited settings and has been shown to be a robust predictor of death. This study evaluates the ability of KTS to predict the mortality of trauma patients compared to other trauma scoring systems.

Methods

Data were collected on injured patients presenting to Central Hospital of Yaoundé, Cameroon from April 15 to October 15, 2009. The KTS, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, Glasgow Coma Scale, and Trauma Injury Severity Score were calculated for each patient. Scores were evaluated as predictors of mortality using logistic regression models. Areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were compared.

Results

Altogether, 2855 patients were evaluated with a mortality rate of 6 per 1000. Each score analyzed was a statistically significant predictor of mortality. The area under the ROC for KTS as a predictor of mortality was 0.7748 (95 % CI 0.6285–0.9212). There were no statistically significant pairwise differences between ROC areas of KTS and other scores. Similar results were found when the analysis was limited to severe injuries.

Conclusions

This comparison of KTS to other trauma scores supports the adoption of KTS for injury surveillance and triage in resource-limited settings. We show that the KTS is as effective as other scoring systems for predicting patient mortality.     

Impact of preinjury warfarin use in elderly trauma patients

BACKGROUND: This study examined the hypothesis that elderly trauma patients on warfarin before injury will have increased morbidity and mortality compared with elderly trauma patients not on warfarin. METHODS: From 1993 to 1995, trauma patients were grouped by age and presence or absence of warfarin use before injury. Groups were analyzed with respect to Injury Severity Score, Trauma Registry and Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Intensive Care Unit days, hospital days, units of blood transfused, and mortality rates. Statistical analysis was completed by using the Student's t test. RESULTS: Records of 61 patients administered warfarin and 800 patients not administered warfarin were available for analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between patients on prehospital warfarin and those not on prehospital warfarin. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that elderly trauma patients on warfarin before injury do not have increased morbidity and mortality compared with elderly trauma patients not on warfarin.