Risk of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection in Elderly Patients on Hemodialysis

Background and objectives

Elderly patients require tunneled central vein dialysis catheters more often than younger patients. Little is known about the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection in this population.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

This study identified 464 patients on hemodialysis with tunneled central vein dialysis catheters between 2005 and 2007 and excluded patients who accrued <21 catheter-days during this period. Outpatient and inpatient catheter-related bloodstream infection data were collected. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusting for sex, ancestry, comorbidites, dialysis vintage, dialysis unit, immunosuppression, initial catheter site, and first antimicrobial catheter lock solution was performed for risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection between nonelderly (18–74 years) and elderly (≥75 years) patients.

Results

In total, 374 nonelderly and 90 elderly patients with mean (SD) ages of 54.8 (12.3) and 81.3 (4.9) years and dialysis vintages of 1.8 (3.3) and 1.5 (2.9) years (P=0.47), respectively, were identified. Mean at-risk catheter-days were 272 (243) in nonelderly and 318 (240) in elderly patients. Between age groups, there were no significant differences in initial catheter site, type of catheter lock solution, or microbiology results. A total of 208 catheter-related bloodstream infection events occurred (190 events in nonelderly and 18 events in elderly patients), with a catheter-related bloodstream infection incidence per 1000 catheter-days of 1.97 (4.6) in nonelderly and 0.55 (1.6) in elderly patients (P<0.001). Relative to nonelderly patients, the hazard ratio for catheter-related bloodstream infection in the elderly was 0.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.55; P<0.001) after multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Elderly patients on hemodialysis using tunneled central vein dialysis catheters are at lower risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection than their younger counterparts. For some elderly patients, tunneled central vein dialysis catheters may represent a suitable dialysis access option in the setting of nonmaturing arteriovenous fistulae or poorly functioning synthetic grafts.     

Effects of a Quality Improvement Program to Reduce Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections in Hemodialysis Patients

BackgroundCentral catheter infections are of concern in patients on hemodialysis because of the high risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections, sepsis, and death. Adequate nursing is critical for the prevention of such infections. This study aimed to use the PDCA (plan-do-check-act) method to reduce the incidence of central venous catheter infection using management in the maintenance of central venous catheter in patients on hemodialysis, compared with routine care.MethodsThis pilot study recruited patients on hemodialysis via central venous catheterization at the Blood Purification Center of Ruijin Hospital between November 2017 and November 2018. The patients were randomized to the routine and PDCA groups. All participants received routine nursing. The PDCA group received central venous catheter management by PDCA. The incidence of central venous catheterization-related infections, nursing satisfaction, and quality of life were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 122 participants were enrolled in each group. The incidence of central catheter-related bloodstream infection, as the primary outcome, was 0.8 and 8.8 cases per 1000 catheter days in the PDCA and routine groups, respectively (P < 0.001). In addition, as the secondary outcomes, the scores of nursing satisfaction (health guidance, nursing technology, and therapeutic effects) score and quality of life (physiological, psychological, social, and environmental status) were better in the PDCA group than in the routine group (all P < 0.01).ConclusionsThis pilot study suggests that the PDCA cycle model can effectively reduce the incidence of central venous catheter-related infections and improve satisfaction and quality of life in patients on hemodialysis.     

Comparative Effectiveness of Two Catheter Locking Solutions to Reduce Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection in Hemodialysis Patients

Background and objectives

Infection is the second leading cause of death in hemodialysis patients. Catheter-related bloodstream infection and infection-related mortality have not improved in this population over the past two decades. This study evaluated the impact of a prophylactic antibiotic lock solution on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection and mortality.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

This prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study compared the effectiveness of two catheter locking solutions (gentamicin/citrate versus heparin) in 555 hemodialysis patients dialyzing with a tunneled cuffed catheter between 2008 and 2011. The groups were not mutually exclusive. Rates of catheter-related bloodstream infection and mortality hazards were compared between groups.

Results

The study population (n=555 and 1350 catheters) had a median age of 62 years (interquartile range=41–83 years), with 50% men and 71% black. There were 427 patients evaluable in the heparin period (84,326 days) and 322 patients evaluable in the antibiotic lock period (71,192 days). Catheter-related bloodstream infection in the antibiotic lock period (0.45/1000 catheter days) was 73% lower than the heparin period (1.68/1000 catheter days; P=0.001). Antibiotic lock use was associated with a decreased risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection compared with heparin (risk ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.13 to 0.38 after multivariate adjustment). Cox proportional hazards modeling found that antibiotic lock was associated with a reduction in mortality (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.58 in unadjusted analyses; hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.75 after multivariate adjustment). The rate of gentamicin-resistant organisms decreased (0.40/1000 person-years to 0.22/1000 person-years) in the antibiotic lock period (P=0.01).

Conclusions

The results of this study show that the use of a prophylactic, gentamicin/citrate lock was associated with a substantial reduction in catheter-related bloodstream infection and is the first to report a survival advantage of antibiotic lock in a population at high risk of infection-related morbidity and mortality.     

Temporary Pancreatic Duct Stenting to Prevent Pancreatitis Induced by Endoscopic Sphincter Dilation

Abstract: To investigate whether prophylactic temporary stenting of the main pancreatic duct would decrease the incidence of pancreatitis after endoscopic sphincter dilation (ESD), we conducted this procedure subsequent to ESD in 13 patients who had common bile duct stones. After ESD and extraction of stones, a stent was placed into the pancreatic duct across the papilla of Vater. The stent was removed endoscopically three days later. Stents were successfully placed in 12 (92.3%) patients. In 11 of the patients, there was no significant elevation of serum amylase values before and after the procedure. The remaining patient, whose stent was identified as occluded, demonstrated elevated serum amylase values. However, there were no other procedure-related complications. Although our report was only limited to 12 cases, our results suggest that temporary pancreatic stenting may help prevent postprocedual pancreatitis. (Dig Endosc 1999; 11:32–36)     

Provider Visit Frequency and Vascular Access Interventions in Hemodialysis

Background and objectives

Medicare reimbursement policy encourages frequent provider visits to patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis. This study sought to determine whether more frequent face-to-face provider (physician and advanced practitioner) visits lead to more procedures and therapeutic interventions aimed at preserving arteriovenous fistulas and grafts, improved vascular access outcomes, and fewer related hospitalizations.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the association between provider (physician and advanced practitioner) visit frequency and interventions aimed at preserving vascular access, vascular access survival, hospitalization for vascular access infection, and outpatient antibiotic use in a cohort of 63,488 Medicare beneficiaries receiving hemodialysis in the United States. Medicare claims were used to identify the type of vascular access used, access-related events, and vascular access failure.

Results

One additional provider (physician and advanced practitioner) visit per month was associated with a 13% higher odds of receiving an intervention to preserve vascular access (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 12% to 14%) but was not associated with vascular access survival (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.03). One additional provider visit was associated with a 9% (95% CI, 5% to 14%) lower odds of hospitalization for vascular access infection and a corresponding 9% (95% CI, 5% to 14%) higher odds of outpatient intravenous antibiotic administration. However, the associated changes in absolute probabilities of hospitalization and antibiotic administration were small.

Conclusions

More frequent face-to-face provider (physician and advanced practitioner) visits were associated with more procedures and therapeutic interventions aimed at preserving vascular accesses, but not with prolonged vascular access survival and only a small decrease in hospitalization for vascular access.     

Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions to Prevent HIV and STDs Among Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Injection drug use is a leading transmission route of HIV and STDs, and disease prevention among drug users is an important public health concern. This study assesses cost-effectiveness of behavioral interventions for reducing HIV and STDs infections among injection drug-using women. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from societal and provider perspectives for randomized trial data and Bernoullian model estimates of infections averted for three increasingly intensive interventions: (1) NIDA’s standard intervention (SI); (2) SI plus a well woman exam (WWE); and (3) SI, WWE, plus four educational sessions (4ES). Trial results indicate that 4ES was cost-effective relative to WWE, which was dominated by SI, for most diseases. Model estimates, however, suggest that WWE was cost-effective relative to SI and dominated 4ES for all diseases. Trial and model results agree that WWE is cost-effective relative to SI per hepatitis C infection averted ($109 308 for in trial, $6 016 in model) and per gonorrhea infection averted ($9 461 in trial, $14 044 in model). In sensitivity analysis, trial results are sensitive to 5 % change in WWE effectiveness relative to SI for hepatitis C and HIV. In the model, WWE remained cost-effective or cost-saving relative to SI for HIV prevention across a range of assumptions. WWE is cost-effective relative to SI for preventing hepatitis C and gonorrhea. WWE may have similar effects as the costlier 4ES.     

Performance of Temporary Hemodialysis Catheter Insertion by Nephrology Fellows and Attending Nephrologists

Background and objectives

Concerns have been raised about nephrology fellows’ skills in inserting temporary hemodialysis catheters. Less is known about temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion skills of attending nephrologists supervising these procedures. The aim of this study was to compare baseline temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion skills of attending nephrologists with the skills of nephrology fellows before and after a simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) intervention.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

This pre- post-intervention study with a pretest-only comparison group was conducted at the University of Toronto in September of 2014. Participants were nephrology fellows and attending nephrologists from three university-affiliated academic hospitals who underwent baseline assessment of internal jugular temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion skills using a central venous catheter simulator. Fellows subsequently completed an SBML intervention, including deliberate practice with the central venous catheter simulator. Fellows were expected to meet or exceed a minimum passing score at post-test. Fellows who did not meet the minimum passing score completed additional deliberate practice. Attending nephrologist and fellow baseline performance on the temporary hemodialysis catheter skills assessment was compared. Fellows’ pre- and post-test temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion performance was compared to assess the effectiveness of SBML. The skills assessment was scored using a previously published 28-item checklist. The minimum passing score was set at 79% of checklist items correct.

Results

In total, 19 attending nephrologists and 20 nephrology fellows participated in the study. Mean attending nephrologist checklist scores (46.1%; SD=29.5%) were similar to baseline scores of fellows (41.1% items correct; SD=21.4%; P=0.55). Only two of 19 attending nephrologists (11%) met the minimum passing score at baseline. After SBML, fellows’ mean post-test score improved to 91.3% (SD=6.9%; P<0.001). Median time between pre- and post-test was 24 hours.

Conclusions

Attending nephrologists’ baseline temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion skills were highly variable and similar to nephrology fellows’ skills, with only a small minority able to competently insert a temporary hemodialysis catheter. SBML was extremely effective for training fellows and should be considered for attending nephrologists who supervise temporary hemodialysis catheter insertions.     

Physical Activity Is Necessary to Prevent Deterioration of the Walking Ability of Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis

Maintenance of the walking ability is very important for smooth continuation of maintenance hemodialysis (HD). The aim of the present study was to clarify the physical activity level in daily living that HD patients should maintain to prevent deterioration of their walking ability. Outpatients undergoing maintenance HD, consisting of 65 males and 88 females with a mean age of 64 ± 11 years, were recruited for the present study. Their physical activity level was recorded over a week with an accelerometer. The physical activity level in daily living was defined as the sum of the lengths of time for which the patients were engaged in physical activity of light or greater intensity during the day, and expressed as the average duration per day. The walking ability was assessed by the normal walking speed and maximum walking speed. Data were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the cut-off point for the physical activity time was determined to predict deterioration of the walking ability. In the prediction of deterioration of the normal and maximum walking speeds, the areas under the ROC curve for the physical activity time were 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.69–0.87, P < 0.001) and 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.63–0.86, P < 0.001), respectively. Moreover, the ROC curve revealed that the cut-off point for the physical activity time to prevent deterioration of the normal and maximum walking speeds was 50 min/day. Thus, HD patients should engage in physical activity for at least 50 min/day to prevent deterioration of their walking ability.     

临时中心静脉插管所致的血液透析并发症

目的 探讨临时中心静脉插管血液透析患者发生的导管相关并发症及其与插管时间、部位的关系.方法 将本院收入的临时插管血液透析患者753例为研究对象,分析血液透析导管相关并发症的危险因素,观察各种并发症与插管时间、部位的关系.结果 透析导管相关感染、导管功能不全、上腔静脉梗阻综合征与中心静脉插管部位、留置时间存在相关性.通过右颈内静脉置管可明显降低患者出现透析导管相关感染、上腔静脉梗阻综合征的机会,同时证明导管功能不全与置管位置无关而与置管时间有关.结论 导管留置部位、留置时间、年龄是透析导管相关感染、导管功能不全、上腔静脉梗阻综合征发生的重要危险因素.     

A Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions to Prevent Sexual Transmission of HIV in the United States

Because resources to fund HIV prevention are limited, public health decision makers—such as health departments and HIV prevention community planning groups—need to know which prevention strategies are the most cost-effective. In the past several years, a number of studies have appeared in the literature that assess the cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV in the United States. Here, we comprehensively review 16 such studies and then outline an agenda for further research to advance the cost-effectiveness literature and to make the findings of these studies more useful for public health decision makers. The research summarized here provides compelling evidence that interventions to prevent sexual transmission of HIV can be highly cost-effective. Small-group, community-level, and outreach-based sexual risk reduction interventions, in particular, appear to be very efficient strategies for preventing the spread of HIV in moderate- to high-risk populations.