D-Tryptophan-6-LH-RH-at Low Doses in the Treatment of Male Subfertility

The aim of this trial was to evaluate the effect of D-TRP-6-LH-RH in patients with idiopathic normogonadotropic oligoasthenozoospermia (I.N.O.). The LH and FSH response to LH-RH before and during treatment was also studied. Seven patients (age 27 to 32 years) with long standing infertility were incorporated. All of them were considered to have I.N.O. on the basis of at least three spermatograms and absence of evidence of other diseases. All patients were treated wtih D-TRP-6-LH-RH (2 microgram i.m. every two days) during 90 days. Control spermatograms were performed at monthly intervals during and after treatment. The responses of LH and FSH to 50 microgram i.v. LH-RH were studied before and after 90 days of treatment. Five of the patients achieved a normalization of the concentration of spermatozoa per ml and of the percentage of forwardly progressive spermatozoa. None of the patients showed inhibition of the response to LH and FSH to LH-RH during treatment. These results differ from others in which larger doses of D-TRP-6-LH-RH determined an inhibition of the pituitary response to LH-RH and an impairment of the spermogram.     

Testicular endocrine function in patients with prostatic cancer receiving medical castration by long-term administration of LH-RH agonists

Six patients with advanced prostatic cancer who had been treated by long-term administration of LH-RH agonistic preparations (Buserelin or Leupron) were tested for their pituitary-testicular endocrine functions. Serum levels of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone (T), prolactin (PRL), estradiol (E2) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) were measured consecutively. In all medically castrated patients, serum levels of LH, FSH, T, DHT and E2 were suppressed and particularly serum T levels were below the castration level of 1.0 ng/ml. On the other hand, serum PRL levels were unchanged after the long-term treatment with the agonists. Serum LH and FSH levels failed to respond to LH-RH stimulation after the treatment, whereas serum T responded to stimulation by human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to various degrees. It was remarkable that, in 4 out of 6 medically castrated patients treated up to more than 3 years, serum T response levels above 1.0 ng/ml were noted. It is suggested that testicular endocrine function to secrete T and DHT in patients under treatment with long-term LH-RH agonist administration are still preserved in response to hCG stimulation.     

Clinical effect of slow release (depot) formulation of the LH-RH analogue ICI 118630 (Zoladex) in patients with prostatic carcinoma

The antitumor effect and safety and endocrinological effect of a depot formulation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) analogue ICI 118630 (Zoladex) were studied. Each depot containing 3.6 mg of ICI 118630 (corresponding to the average daily release of 120 micrograms) was subcutaneously injected 3 times at 4 week intervals to 12 prostate cancer patients in total at 4 centers from August 1984 to March 1985. Of the 12 patients, 7 showed an objective clinical response (1 CR and 6 PR patients), 3 showed no change and the remaining 2 showed PD. Overall subjective improvement was obtained in 8 of 10 patients (80.0%). Serum hormone levels (LH, FSH, and testosterone) increased immediately after injection of depot and then significantly decreased during and after 2 weeks of treatment. These changes seen in 100% of the patients were attributable to the pharmacological action of the drug. Medical castration was attained in 3.1 +/- 0.9 weeks on average. Observed side effects included gynecomastia in 1 and hyperlipidemia in 2 patients which were all mild. The trial was continued in the patients who required no special medical treatment. Changes in blood Zoladex concentrations suggested no accumulation. These findings demonstrate the safety and useful endocrinological and antitumor effects of Zoladex in prostate cancer through its pharmacological action, that is, LH-RH agonistic action.     

Treatment of prostatic cancer with slow-release formulation of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) analog

A slow-release formulation of the luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH)analog(TAP-144-SR) was administered in 6 cases of prostatic cancer. Five were untreated cases, 3 of moderately-differentiated and 2 of poorly-differentiated cancers (four D2 and one C, NX), the other (D2) was under control by another LH-RH analog. The plasma level of luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone fell below normal, and the plasma testosterone was less than 1 ng/ml by four weeks after start of treatment. According to the National Prostatic Cancer Project Criteria, 2 of the untreated cases showed a partial response and 3 of the untreated ones showed a stable response, one of which underwent transurethral resection later. The pretreated case still continued controlled more than 4 months. No side effect was noticed.     

Hormonal pattern and testicular histology in patients with prostatic cancer after long-term treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist analogue

Seven patients suffering from prostatic cancer were treated with a depot form of D-Trp-6-luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH), a LH-RH agonist analogue (3 mg i.m. every 28 days) for a period of 24-32 months. The peptide induced a sharp and long-lasting inhibition of both gonadotropin and testosterone secretion. A sustained suppression of pituitary and testicular function was observed 40 days after the treatment was suspended. Testicular biopsies performed in all patients showed a marked impairment of Leydig cell mass and a complete spermatogenic arrest with a tubular derangement and fibrosis. Results indicate that the long-term continued gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist analogue therapy induces not only a functional inhibition of testicular androgenesis but also anatomical testicular damage whose reversibility does not seem to be probable.     

Treatment of prostatic cancer with an LH-RH agonist: the D Trp6 LH-RH. Preliminary results in 30 cases

Thirty patients with advanced prostatic cancers (8 stage C, and 22 stage D) were treated for at least three months with D Trp6 LH-RH, a powerful LH-RH agonist. In all the cases in which the testosterone levels had been normal before treatment, the treatment led to a decline to the levels observed after castration. In seven cases, the drop was preceded by a rise in the first few days of treatment. Twenty two patients reacted favorably to the "medical castration" resulting from LH-RH agonists (11 improved and 11 remained stable). The improvements were mainly noted in patients who had not undergone previous treatment. Four deaths were registered in patients already at an advanced stage. Two of these patients presented with visceral metastases in circumstances such that a sudden deterioration due to the agonists cannot be excluded.     

Phase II trial with D-Trp-6-LH-RH in prostatic carcinoma: comparison with other hormonal agents

Various approaches to hormonal treatment of prostate carcinoma are discussed. Eighty-one patients with prostatic carcinoma, eight with stage B, nine with stage C, and 64 with stage D disease, were treated subcutaneously daily for 3 months with the LH-RH agonist D-Trp-6-LH-RH (Decapeptyl) in order to evaluate the incidence of remissions according to WHO recommendations for oncologic trials. The findings were compared to those obtained with other hormonal therapies of prostatic carcinoma according to the statistical method of "expected response rate" as adapted by Lee and Wesley for phase II trials. Treatment with D-Trp-6-LH-RH greatly reduced serum LH and testosterone levels without raising serum prolactin. After 1-2 weeks of therapy, there was relief of subjective symptoms and a reversal of the signs of prostatism as well as a marked decrease in bone pain. At 90 days 52 patients had complete relief of prostatism and 21 had only mild signs and symptoms. Seventy patients were experiencing no bone pain and an additional six had only mild pain. Prostatic size, evaluated by rectal examination and transabdominal ultrasonography, reverted to normal in 26.4% of patients (complete remission) and was reduced by more than 50% in an additional 17.6% (partial remission), the overall rate of complete plus partial regression of prostatic enlargement being 44%. Scans showed a major improvement of bone lesions in 14.8% of cases. This response increased to 37% after more than 6 months of follow-up. Prostatic acid phosphatase levels were decreased by more than 50% in 61% of the patients, but this test appears to be a less valid marker than the lipid-associated sialic acid (LASA). The increase in LASA before treatment and a reduction after treatment can frequently be correlated with the objective volume of the neoplasms. No flare-up of the disease was encountered, and there were no side effects except for impotence. Statistical analyses of results by the method of Lee and Wesley indicated that the incidence of complete and partial regression (CR and PR) observed with D-Trp-6-LH-RH was not significantly different from that recorded in previous studies for another LH-RH analog, Buserelin. However, CR and PR obtained with D-Trp-6-LH-RH (44%) were significantly higher than with subcapsular orchiectomy (22%). Hormonal effects and some other actions of D-Trp-6-LH-RH were compared and contrasted with those produced by castration, estrogens, antiandrogens, and progestogens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Endocrine profiles and gonadotropin response to Gn-RH of men with testicular cancer

PURPOSE: To investigate the function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis in testicular germ cell tumors, we evaluated gonadotropin responses to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (Gn-RH), semen quality, and serum levels of sex steroid hormones in patients with testicular cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Basal serum levels of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and human chorionic gonadotropin-beta (hCG-beta) were measured before and after high orchiectomy in 20 patients with germ cell tumors of the testicle (9 with seminoma and 11 with nonseminomatous tumor). Semen quality and basal serum levels of testosterone, free testosterone, and estradiol were measured before orchiectomy. The Gn-RH test was performed before orchiectomy in all patients and after orchiectomy in patients without detectable gonadotropin levels in pre-operative serum samples. Gonadotropin levels were measured at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after intravenous injection of 100 micrograms of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH). RESULTS: Serum gonadotropin concentrations were not detectable in 6 of 8 (75%) men with hCG positive tumors or in 4 of 12 (33.3%) men with hCG negative tumors before orchiectomy. Before surgery, 10 men without detectable gonadotropin levels showed complete suppression of the LH and FSH responses to LH-RH and 10 men with detectable gonadotropin levels showed significant increases in the LH and FSH responses (p < 0.01) at 30 minutes. After surgery, the Gn-RH test was performed in 9 men without detectable gonadotropin levels prior to surgery. Seven of these 9 men exhibited significant increases in the LH and FSH responses (p < 0.01) at 30 minutes while no response to LH-RH before or after surgery was seen in 2 men with detectable serum hCG-beta. We observed a significantly lower sperm density (median 7.5 x 10(6)/ml, range 0.4 to 17.8) in men with hCG positive tumors than in men with hCG negative tumors (median 33 x 10(6)/ml, range 0 to 103) (p < 0.002). Although testosterone levels did not differ significantly in men with hCG positive tumors and men with hCG negative tumors, free testosterone levels were significantly higher in men with hCG positive tumors (median 28.4 ng/ml, range 8.5 to 39.8) compared with men with hCG negative tumors (median 18.7 ng/ml, range 4.9 to 24.1) (p < 0.002). Estradiol levels were significantly increased in men with hCG positive tumors (median 44 pg/ml, range 26 to 110) compared with men with hCG negative tumors (median 33.5 pg/ml, range 10 to 87) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The present findings indicate that serum hCG producing testicular cancers are associated with a complete suppression of the gonadotropin response to Gn-RH at the pituitary level, resulting in an inhibition of LH and FSH secretion, and also that serum hCG secreted by testicular cancers may suppresses spermatogenesis and may stimulate androgen and estradiol production by the testes. Since suppressed serum gonadotoropin levels are found in men with hCG non-producing testicular cancers, other factors derived from the tumor may cause downregulation of the gonadotropin response to Gn-RH.     

Pharmacodynamics of a long acting depot preparation of avorelin in patients with prostate cancer. Avorelin Study Group

PURPOSE: We evaluate the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a sustained release depot formulation of avorelin, a new potent super agonist of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptors, in patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients were randomized to receive a 10 mg. (31) or 15 mg. (29) avorelin subcutaneous depot. Serum testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and plasma avorelin were measured regularly until depot exhaustion. RESULTS: Of the 10 mg. group patients 3 withdrew from the study after 31 to 35 weeks due to disease progression. Of the 15 mg. group patients 1 did not complete the study for logistical reasons. After the expected flare in serum testosterone, LH and FSH during week 1, medical castration (testosterone concentration less than 1.735 nmol./l.) was achieved within 4 weeks of depot injection. Median duration of testosterone suppression was 40 weeks in the 10 mg. (95% confidence interval 35 to 42) and 39 in the 15 mg. (37 to 43) group. The reduction in serum LH was similar to that of testosterone, while that of FSH was less pronounced. Plasma avorelin was proportional to the dose and correlated with serum testosterone. Normalization of serum prostate specific (4 ng./ml. or less) at 6 months was achieved in 80 and 88% of the 10 and 15 mg. groups, respectively. During the (7 to 20-month) observation period 94 and 86% of the 10 and 15 mg. groups, respectively, complained of adverse events mainly related to androgen suppression (hot flushes, decreased libido and impotence) or the nature of the disease (skeletal pain). In each group 3 patients had serious adverse events requiring hospitalization for reasons unrelated to avorelin treatment. The depot was well tolerated locally. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous depot formulations of avorelin were well tolerated and had protracted inhibitory effects on pituitary gonadotropin secretion in patients with prostate cancer. Testosterone suppression was maintained for more than 6 months in all patients. Avorelin depots could be the first luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist formulation to be administered at 6-month intervals.     

The gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist abarelix depot versus luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists leuprolide or goserelin: initial results of endocrinological and biochemical efficacies in patients with prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We contrasted the endocrinological and biochemical efficacies of abarelix depot, a pure gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, with a prospective concurrent control cohort receiving luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonists with or without antiandrogen for treatment of patients with prostate cancer receiving initial hormonal therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this phase 2 open label study 242 patients with prostate cancer requiring initial hormonal treatment received abarelix depot (209) or LH-RH agonists (33) with or without antiandrogen. A total of 100 mg. abarelix depot was delivered intramuscularly every 28 days with an additional injection on day 15. LH-RH agonists with or without antiandrogen were administered according to the depot formulation used. Endocrine efficacy was measured by the absence of testosterone surge and rapidity of castration onset. The rate of prostate specific antigen decrease was assessed. RESULTS: No patient treated with abarelix depot had testosterone surge during week 1 compared with 82% of those treated with LH-RH agonists. The concomitant administration of antiandrogen had no effect. During the first week of drug administration, in 75% of patients treated with abarelix depot and in 0% of those treated with LH-RH agonist medical castration was achieved. Prostate specific antigen decrease was faster, with no flare or surge in patients treated with abarelix depot. Abarelix depot was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Abarelix depot represents a new class of hormonal therapy, gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists, that has rapid medical castration and avoids the testosterone surge characteristic of LH-RH agonists.     

Clinical effects of a 3-month formulation LH-RH agonist (Zoladex LA 10.8 mg depot) in patients with prostate cancer]

Pharmacodynamics (PD), anti-tumor effects, safety and pharmacokinetics of a 3-month formulation of goserelin (Zoladex LA 10.8 mg depot: "10.8 mg depot") were investigated in a collaborative multicenter study. Study participants were 40 Japanese patients with prostate cancer comprising 20 untreated patients and 20 switch patients who had been receiving Zoladex 3.6 mg depot for 3 months or longer. Serum testosterone levels, serum LH levels, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and drug concentrations were measured until 12 weeks after a single subcutaneous dose of 10.8 mg depot. Anti-tumor effects were evaluated by means of changes in the tumor lesions and the PSA levels at 12 weeks. After administration to the untreated patients, 10.8 mg depot reduced serum testosterone to the castrate range within 4 weeks and the reduction was maintained for up to 12 weeks. In the switch patients, serum testosterone suppression that had been produced by previous treatment with Zoladex 3.6 mg depot was maintained for up to 12 weeks following 10.8 mg depot administration. The anti-tumor effect at 12 weeks was 90.0% including partial response cases. The ratio of PSA normalization at 12 weeks was 75.0%. Fifty-seven adverse reactions were observed in 27 of the 40 patients (67.5%), but none were clinically significant. Although a disease flare presented as urinary retention in 1 of the untreated patients, all patients completed the study. Serum goserelin was detected up to 12 weeks after the administration of 10.8 mg depot. In conclusion a single dose of 10.8 mg depot showed a satisfactory PD-effect and brought about clinical efficacy persisting for at least 12 weeks and was well tolerated in patients with prostate cancer.     

Time course of serum testosterone and luteinizing hormone levels after cessation of long-term luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist treatment in patients with prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION: In order to elucidate the influence of hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist therapy cessation on pituitary/testicular function and its clinical implications, we investigated prospectively hormonal (luteinizing hormone: LH; testosterone: T) responses in patients with prostate cancer who received long-term LH-RH 10 agonist therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive 32 patients who had received LH-RH agonist therapy over 24 months were enrolled. As a baseline, T and LH were measured at the time of LH-RH agonist therapy cessation, monthly for 3 months, and subsequently, every 3 months. RESULTS: The median duration of LH-RH agonist therapy was 30 months (24-87 months) with median follow-up duration of 24 months following cessation. All patients had castrated T levels and suppressed LH levels at baseline. Median duration of castrated T levels following cessation was 6 months. Median time to normalization of T levels was 24 months. LH levels returned to normal within 3 months in all cases. Patients who received androgen deprivation therapy for 30 months or longer required a longer time for recovery of T levels. Patients over 65 years of age showed a statistically significant longer time for recovery of T levels (P=0.0167). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term LH-RH agonist therapy has remarkable effects on serum T level that last for a significant time after cessation, a fact that should be applied to the interpretation of both PSA and serum T levels after cessation of androgen deprivation therapy.     

Clinical study of leuprolide depot formulation in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.The Leuprolide Study Group

In a phase III, open, multicenter study we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the depot formulation of leuprolide (7.5 mg. injected intramuscularly every 4 weeks) in patients with stage D2 prostate cancer who had not previously received systemic treatment. Serum testosterone, luteinizing hormone and plasma leuprolide levels were monitored during the 24-week study period. Median interval to onset of castrate testosterone levels was 21 days and mean testosterone levels decreased to within the castrate range by week 3 of treatment. After onset of castrate levels there were no escapes (defined as 2 consecutive values of greater than 50 ng./dl.) of testosterone levels during the 24 weeks. Suppression of testosterone did not differ significantly from that observed in patients receiving the daily subcutaneous injection of leuprolide acetate in the first 24 weeks of another study. Objective response (no progression) to treatment occurred in 81% of 53 evaluable patients and adverse (related and unrelated) events were reported in 45 of the 56 patients. The response rate and incidence of adverse events in this study did not differ significantly from those occurring with the daily formulation. We conclude that the depot formulation of leuprolide is safe and effective in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer, and that the safety and efficacy of this formulation do not differ significantly from those of the daily subcutaneous formulation.     

Effects of LH-RH analogue on pituitary-testicular axis and bladder carcinogenesis of BBN administered male rats

As a first step of investigating male predominance of bladder cancer incidence, we have studied relationships between rat bladder carcinogenesis, induced by BBN, and changes of pituitary-testicular axis, induced by a LH-RH analogue. The rats were divided into the following five groups. The first group (Age matched control group) was given normal drinking water for 30 weeks. The 2nd group (BBN group) was given a drinking water containing 0.05% BBN for 6 weeks. The 3rd group (LH-RH group) was given subcutaneous injections of a LH-RH analogue depot every four weeks. The 4th group (LH-RH + BBN group) was given subcutaneous injections of the LH-RH analogue depot every four weeks and a drinking water containing 0.05% BBN for 6 weeks. The 5th group (castration group) was castrated and given normal drinking water. The results were summarized as follows. 1) Serum LH, FSH and testosterone levels reached their peaks one day after the LH-RH analogue injection and decreased afterwards. Testosterone marked a castration level one week after the LH-RH analogue injection. 2) There was no significant difference between the BBN and non BBN groups in serum LH, FSH and testosterone levels. Thus, BBN did not influence the pituitary-testicular axis and the action of the LH-RH analogues. 3) Incidence of cancer was higher in the group of BBN + LH-RH than in the group of BBN 8 weeks after the start of the experiment. Then, the incidence was reversed between 20 weeks and 26 weeks; finally it became almost the same at 30 weeks. This phenomenon may be explained by the experimented schedule we applied; that is, BBN and LH-RH analogue were administered simultaneously. 4) Thus, changes of the pituitary-testicular axis induced by the LH-RH analogue seemed to have influence on bladder carcinogen.     

Clinical and endocrinological studies of the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy in prostatic cancer patients

A luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) analogue was administered for 3 to 32 months to 15 prostatic cancer patients in stage B-D (B:3, C:8, D:4). Intratesticular, intratubular and prostatic androgen levels were measured by radioimmunoassay before and after LH-RH analogue therapy. The measurement of serum prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and prostatic specific antigen (PA) levels was also conducted. Thereafter, we assessed the effect of the LH-RH analogue on androgen levels and the relation of prostatic tissue 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) level to the clinical response. The results were as follows: 1) Johnsen's mean germinal epithelium count was significantly decreased from 7.7 +/- 2.1 (mean +/- S.D.) to 4.3 +/- 2.3, and the wall thickness of seminiferous tubules was increased from 5.93 +/- 1.31 to 11.9 +/- 3.64 microns. 2) Plasma testosterone (T), intratesticular and intratubular androgen levels were significantly decreased (plasma T: from 4.40 +/- 1.84 to 0.61 +/- 0.32 ng/ml, intratesticular T: from 335.3 +/- 170.3 to 4.6 +/- 3.8 ng/g.t.w., DHT: from 25.3 +/- 11.7 to 3.7 +/- 2.7 ng/g.t.w., intratubular T: from 50.8 +/- 36.6 to 0.10 +/- 0.99 ng/g.t.w. and DHT: 7.54 +/- 3.20 to 0.63 +/- 0.90 ng/g.t.w.). 3) Crude nuclear DHT levels in prostatic tissue fell from 15.3 +/- 9.3 (N = 8) to 0.37 +/- 0.54 pg/mg protein (N = 3) and the level was non-detectable in 5 of 8 cases. 4) Complete remission was achieved in 1 patient, partial response in 5, objective stable in 8, and objective progression in 1 patient, according to Shimazaki's criteria.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Persistent blockade of the pituitary-gonadal axis in patients with prostatic carcinoma during chronic administration of D-Trp-6-LH-RH

Forty patients with stage D2 prostatic carcinoma were treated for up to 30 months with D-Trp-6-LH-RH. The analog was given s.c. once daily at a dose of 1 mg/day for the first 7 days. Subsequently, the dose was reduced to 100 micrograms/day. In follow-up studies, 30 men continued this therapy for up to 24 months. Blood samples were taken before the injection of the analog and 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours later. Serum LH, FSH, and testosterone levels were measured by RIA every month for 2 years. The initial administration of 1 mg D-Trp-6-LH-RH caused a marked elevation of LH and FSH, which lasted more than 24 hours. However, 1 month later and throughout the therapy, the basal values of LH and FSH were below the normal range and no increase in serum gonadotropins levels was obtained after administration of the analog. Initial plasma testosterone was within normal limits, but during treatment with D-Trp-6-LH-RH it fell to castration levels, and no increases were seen during the 6 hours following the injection of the analog. These results show that chronic administration of D-Trp-6-LH-RH, at the doses used, blocks the pituitary-gonadal axis and that the escape phenomenon from the effects of the LH-RH agonists-induced blockade does not occur under our conditions in contrast to observations of Kerle et al with the I.C.I. Analog 118630 (8). The accumulated results reinforce the view that long-term therapy with agonists of LH-RH is the preferred alternative to surgical castration or therapy with estrogens in men with metastatic prostate cancer.     

Treatment of prostatic cancer with LH-RH analogues

Twenty-one of 32 patients with locally advanced prostatic cancer (stage C) were treated with the LH-RH analogue Buserelin for 7-19 months. After an initial sequence of subcutaneous injections, treatment was continued with intranasal spray application (three daily doses of 400 μg each) which ensured maintenance of serum testosterone within the range seen in castrated men. To evaluate the response of the primary tumor to Buserelin, cytological regression was established for all patients by fine-needle aspiration biopsy every 3 months. The cytological results corresponded with those of DNA analyses of single-cell cytophotometry showing a statistically significant drop of the grade of aneuploidy or polyploidy when the prostatic carcinoma responded positively to Buserelin therapy. Seventeen of 21 patients treated with the potent LH-RH analogue showed good therapy response. Four patients with no cytological signs of tumor regression received secondary treatment with estramustin phosphate because of hormone resistence. One patient had to be crossed over to cyclophosphamide, the third drug, for clinical progression after 15 months. Essential side effects have not been observed. Continuous treatment of locally advanced prostatic cancer with Buserelin, combined with close control of the patient, offers not only a real alternative to surgical castration–as the patient is spared the psychical stress of orchiectomy–but also to estrogen therapy with its risk of cardiovascular side effects.     

Quality of life following endocrine therapy for advanced prostate cancer: a comparative study between LH-RH agonist 1-month depot and 3-month depot

PURPOSE: There were few studies which reported the longitudinal quality of life (QOL) for Japanese men who received endocrine therapy for advanced or metastatic prostate cancer. A pilot randomized trial was conducted to assess QOL and the incidence of hot flash following endocrine therapy using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist goserelin acetate 1-month or 3-month depot alone in patients with advanced or metastatic prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 28 patients with advanced or metastatic prostate cancer who received LH-RH analogue goserelin acetate depot alone for 12 months were randomized (1:1) to two different formulations. Fifteen patients received the 1-month depot and thirteen patients received 3-month depot, namely Zoladex 3.6 mg depot and Zoladex LA 10.8 mg depot, respectively. We measured health related QOL using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and EuroQol (EQ-5D) questionnaire and evaluated the incidence of hot flashes between the two groups for one year after diagnosis. Moreover, we evaluated the incidence of hot flashes between the 1M and 3M depot. A baseline interview was conducted before treatment. Follow-up interviews were conducted in person at scheduled study visits of 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: Five (18%) patients dropped out of the study. Thus, we analyzed 23 eligible patients (11 in the 1M arms and 12 in the 3M arms). No significant differences between the two treatment arms were detected in categories of age, average pre- PSA values, Gleason scores and clinical T stage. According to EORTC, each treatment group showed similar QOL scores in all domains before and after treatment. With regard to EQ-5D, the 1M-treatnent arm reported better utility scores than 3M treatment arm, which was no significant statistically. The overall incidence of hot flash was 61% (58% in 1M group and 64% in 3M group). CONCLUSION: There were no differences with regard to general and disease specific HRQOL between the both formulations of goserelin acetate. Hot flashes are the major adverse effects of endocrine therapy for Japanese patients with prostate cancer.     

Comparison of Hormonal Therapy and Chemohormonal Therapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Clinical Stage D Prostatic Cancer

Background: In order to examine the usefulness of chemohormonal therapy, we conducted a multicentered randomized trial comparing hormonal therapy, using a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist, with chemohormonal therapy, hormonal therapy plus cyclophosphamide (CPM), in patients with newly diagnosed clinical stage D prostatic cancer.
Methods: Between January 1991 and March 1995, 41 evaluable patients with stage D prostatic cancer were randomized into 2 groups: group A (hormonal therapy alone), goserelin acetate depot 3.6mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks; group B (chemohormonal therapy), goserelin acetate depot 3.6mg subcutaneously and CPM 1000mg/m² intravenously every 4 weeks. The responses to the therapies were evaluated based on the criteria of The Japanese Urological Association.
Results: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to objective and subjective response rates. No advantage in chemohormonal therapy was observed in the survival rate and progression-free survival rate. However, the survival rate and progression-free survival rate of responders were significantly higher than those of nonresponders in both groups. When the results were categorized by histologic grade patients with poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma had significantly higher response rates, survival rates, and disease-progression-free survival rates in Group B compared to similar patients in Group A.
Conclusions: We conclude that chemohormonal therapy does not definitely improve the clinical response and prognosis of patients with stage D prostatic cancer; however, for patients with poorly-ditferentiated adenocarcinoma, chemohormonal therapy is a useful treatment.     

Response of patients with advanced prostatic cancer to administration of somatostatin analog RC-160 (vapreotide) at the time of relapse

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of administration of the somatostatin analog RC-160 (vapreotide) at the time of relapse in patients with androgen independent prostate cancer. METHODS: Our study included 13 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer, stage D3. Eight patients had been treated with a depot formulation of the agonist D-Trp-6-LH-RH, with a median remission time of 68 (range 48-102 months). Five patients were initially treated by surgical orchiectomy, but relapsed after a median time of 33 months (range 17-91 months). A new remission period with a median duration of 10 months (range 2-29 months) was induced with Ketoconazole in the orchiectomy group. At the relapse time, all the patients received 1 mg of vapreotide t.i.d., by subcutaneous route, in addition to D-Trp-6-LH-RH, or Ketoconazole in the orchiectomy group. RESULTS: Eight of 13 patients demonstrated clinical improvement after 3 months of therapy with vapreotide, six showing a decrease in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) from 234.5 +/- 308.5 to 68.2 +/- 60.5 ng/ml (mean decline 71 +/- 8%; P < 0.05). Two additional patients presented a fall in serum prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP). Responding patients showed a decrease in the bone pain score from 2.62 +/- 0.48 to 0.37 +/- 0.69 and an increase in the Karnofsky performance status from 72.3 +/- 4.21 to 83.6 +/- 23.2 (P < 0.05). In accord with the ECOG criteria, two patients had a complete response; four had partial response, and two had a stable response. Four patients did not respond and one was not evaluable. Two patients died in remission, one at 16 months due to myocardial infarction and the other at 24 months due to pneumonia. Three patients relapsed at 5, 17, and 19 months respectively. Three patients who have been followed-up for more than 3 years continued in remission (79, 45, and 45 months) respectively. Vapreotide was well tolerated, only three patients having transitory mild diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that therapy with the somatostatin analog vapreotide at the time of relapse can induce objective clinical responses in some patients with prostate cancer who are refractory to androgen ablation induced by LH-RH analogs or orchiectomy.